M/s. Chennai Ferrous Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & CCE (Chennai Outer Commissionerate)

M/s. Chennai Ferrous Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & CCE (Chennai Outer Commissionerate)
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 325 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 5-6-2018
Appeal No. E/42590/2017 – Final Order No. 41727 / 2018
Central Excise
Hon'ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Shri S. Venkatachalam, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyam, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
1. Brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in manufacture of sponge iron and are registered to the Central Excise Department. They filed a refund claim on 01.05.2015 of Rs. 17,44,041/- on the ground that they made double payment during the month of June, 2014. The appellant-company came into exist

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence, this appeal.
2. On behalf of the appellant, the learned Counsel Shri S. Venkatachalam, submitted that the appellant has produced the bank statement to show that on 07.07.2014 the amount was wrongly paid into the Central Excise Account of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries Ltd. On realizing the mistake on the very same day, the appellant had paid the amount to their own Central Excise Account/ECC. The refund has been denied stating that the amount so paid is lying in the PLA account of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries and, therefore, the appellant is not eligible for refund. He adverted to para 2 of the order, in original, and argued that along with the refund claim apart from the copy of invoices,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s proof of excess payment;
iii. Signed Bank Statement for the month of July 2014.
iv. Disclaimer Certificate of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries Ltd., (Sponge Iron Division)
6. The only ground on which the refund has been rejected is that the amount is lying in the PLA account of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries and, therefore, without proper No Objection Certificate from the said company the appellant cannot be granted refund. The Hon'ble High Court of Madras, in the case of M/s. Sundaram Industries Ltd. Vs. CCE Madurai 2015 (321) ELT 37 (Madras), had considered a similar issue, and on production of No Objection letter from the company concerned, it was held by the High Court that refund has to be granted. In the present case also, the disc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on Commercial Pilot License Training Fees

GST on Commercial Pilot License Training Fees
Query (Issue) Started By: – RAVINDRA SANCHETI Dated:- 4-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 7 Replies
GST
Hello
One of the client is a company registered as Non Profit Organisation and providing services of Commercial Pilot License Training to students.
Query – Whether the company is liable for GST on Training Fees collected from their students on Training for Commercial Pilot License ? Please give reference of circular or notification if exempt.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, In my point of view GST is applicable.
Our experts may correct me if mistaken.
Thanks
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
The training of commercial pilot can be classified under HSN 99929. No Exemption is available. Therefore, GST is applicable.
Our experts may correct me if mistaken.
Thanks,
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
We endorse the view of Mr. Jani.
Reply By RAVINDRA SANCHETI:
The Reply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ards to GST Law. For better understanding, the Section 17(5)(a) is given below:-
“(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;”
From above, it is clear that you are eligible to take ITC of motor vehicles and other conveyances (in your case air-craft, gliders etc.) and you can take ITC only if you are to make taxable supplies, i.e. imparting training on flying.
The exemption by an educational institute to its student and staff is limited to services mentioned and is not applicable in your case, moreover, in your case, if skill development corporation has declared any such scheme then you can avail that exemption, but as far as my knowledge permits no such scheme is declared, therefore, you are not eligible for this exemption also

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e code (Tariff)
Description of Service
Rate (per cent.)
condition
66
Heading 9992
Services provided-
by an educational institution to its students, faculty and staff;
Nil
Nil
Term educational institute has been defined under Clause (y) of Para 2 of the Notification No. 12/2017 Central tax and Notification No. 12/2017State Tax (Rate) as
“educational institution means an institution providing services by way of-
* pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent;
* education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognised by law for the time being in force;
* education as a pat of an approved vocational education course;”
A perusal of the entry 66 of the exemption notifications make is very clear that the exemption provided therein is very broad in scope and a blanket exemption from levy of CGST and TGST has been provided on any intra-state supply of services by an educational institution to its student, faculty and s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ind and soul of ignorance. It enhances an individual's personality and provides him confidence to reach out to the world. In literal terms, 'Education' according to Chambers Dictionary is "bringing up or training; strengthening of the powers of body or mind; culture." In Advanced Law Lexicon (P. Ramanatha Aiyar, 3rd Edition, 2005, Vol.2) 'education' is defined in very wide terms. It is stated: "Education is the bringing up; the process of developing and training the powers and capabilities of human beings. In its broadest sense the word comprehends not merely the instruction received at school, or college but the whole course of training moral, intellectual and physical; is not limited to the ordinary instruction of the child in the pursuits of literature. It also comprehends a proper attention to the moral and religious sentiments of the child. And it is sometimes used as synonymous with 'learning'.
Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of P.A. Inamdar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oes not cease to be a service to the society. And even though an occupation, it cannot be equated to a trade or a business
Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Schooling, Sole Trustee, Lok Shikshana Trust v. C.I.T (1976) 1 SCC 254 wherein while dealing with the conception of education their Lordships have observed thus:
“Education means the systematic instruction, schooling or training given to the young in preparation for the work of life. It also connotes the whole course of scholastic instruction which a person has received…what education connotes is the process of training and developing the knowledge, skill, mind and character of students by formal schooling.”
D.4 From the above it is very clear that the term 'education' as in literal sense and as defined by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, is much wider. Term education encompasses every learning, experience and knowledge gained consciously or unconsciously. Education is a process by which latent capabilities and qualities of a pers

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntral Excise, Customs & Service tax, vs M/s Garg Aviations Ltd. Central Excise Appeal No. 97 of 2014. The relevant part of the judgment is reproduced asunder:
“The following questions of law have been framed:
(i.) Whether, the respondent is liable to service Tax on Flying Training Institute and Aircraft Engineering Institutes under Commercial Training or Coaching Services?
(ii.) Whether, the course Completion Certificate offered by such Institutes, to successful students, qualifies as any certificate of diploma or degree or any educational qualification recognized by law for the time being in force or not?
The assessee, namely M/s Garg Aviations Limited is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is running a Flying Training Institute and Aircraft Maintenance Engineering Institute at Kanpur. It is engaged in providing training and coaching to individuals in the field of flying of aircraft for obtaining Commercial Pilot License from the Director Civil Aviation (DG

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

excluded from the domain of commercial training or coaching centres, 'training centres or establishments issuing any certificate or diploma or degree or any educational qualification recognized by law'. Even after 30th April, 2011, though the part of Section 65(27) making such exclusion has been deleted but the Notification dated 25th April, 2011 supra issued in exercise of powers under Section 93 of the Finance Act has exempted "coaching or training leading to grant of a certificate or diploma or degree or any educational qualification which is recognized by any law from the whole of Service Tax leviable under Section 66 of the Finance Act".
14. We have wondered, what could be the reason for exempting from payment of service tax those training or coaching centres, even though commercial, whose certificate/degree/diploma/ qualification is "recognized by law." The only plausible reason, according to us, can be to exclude from ambit of service tax those tra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on offered by Institutes which are without approval of DGCA would not confer the benefit of such relaxation. Thus, the certificate/training/qualification offered by approved Institutes, has by the Act, Rules and the CAR been conferred some value in the eyes of law, even if it be only for the purpose of eligibility for obtaining ultimate licence/approval for certifying repair/maintenance/airworthiness of aircrafts. The Act, Rules and CAR distinguish an approved Institute from an unapproved one and a successful candidate from an approved institute would be entitled to enforce the right, conferred on him by the Act, Rules and CAR, to one year relaxation against the DGCA in a Court of law. The inference can only be one, that the Course Completion Certificate/training offered by such Institutes is recognized by law.
26………..
27………..
28. We are therefore of the view that the Instruction aforesaid holding the petitioner to be assessable to Service Tax is contrary to Section 6

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aining which is, considering the wide scope of terms education as explained by Hon'ble Supreme court, qualifies as education, as such education is for obtaining a qualification recognised by law i..e commercial pilot license given by DGCA after passing their exam and other test.
I am of the view that training and coaching provided by flight training institutes are exempted from GST.
it may be noted that words commercial training or coaching has not been used in GST. Hence there is no point in discussing whether any activity of imparting knowledge would qualify as coaching or training or education. any service provided by an educational institution shall be exempted and to qualify as an educational institution, such institution must provide education (which could be either pure theoretical knowledge or practical knowledge ore even training in some sport) which is part of the curriculam for obtainining a qualification recognised by law for the time being in force. it may gains be n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Frequently Asked Questions on Banking, Insurance and Stock Brokers Sector – GST

Frequently Asked Questions on Banking, Insurance and Stock Brokers Sector – GST
GST
Dated:- 4-6-2018

Q.1 Whether Banks are required to capture the details of ATMs in registration certificate as a 'place of business'?
Ans. No. Banks are not required to provide the details of ATMs while applying for registration. For the purposes of registration, ATM on its own does not constitute a place of business, as defined in the CGST Act, 2017.
Q.2 As per RBI guidelines, Banks can use third party ATMs, Business Correspondents (BC), Customer Service Points (CSP) or third party warehouses. Are Banks required to include these third party places also in their GST registration?
Ans- No. Third party places are neither places of business nor fixed establishments from where Banks ordinarily carry on their business. These are independent service providers to the Bank which are subject to GST. Thus, these places are not required to be declared as place of business by the Bank.
Q.3 What wil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ge GST in this case. However, where the payment for such supplies has been made (prior to issuance of invoice) as advance before the 1st of July, 2017, the tax would be payable under the law prevalent prior to 1st July, 2017, as the point of taxation had arisen before this date to the extent of advance.
Q5. Is it necessary for Banks / insurers to report the details of exempt and non-GST supplies in Table 8 of GSTR-1?
Ans. Yes. In the absence of any specific exemption to the Banks / insurers, the information is required to be provided in the said table.
Q6. Is it necessary for Banks / insurers to report the details of invoices in Table 13 of GSTR-1?
Ans. Rule 54(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017 provides that in case of an insurer or a banking company or a financial institution, including a non-banking financial company, the tax invoice or any other document in lieu thereof, may not be serially numbered. But this does not mean that such document will not have any identification number whic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to be distributed, during which turnover for all recipients is available in cases where the turnover in States/Union Territories for the previous financial year is not available. Therefore, in such cases, for the quarters after July 2017 to September 2017, the State/UT-wise turnover for the purposes of ISD can be determined based on the turnovers for the quarter of July 2017 to September 2017. For the months of July, August and September, 2017, the turnover for the month of July, 2017 may be considered for the purposes of distribution of credit.
Q9- Is the condition to make payment for the value of supply plus the GST thereon required to be complied with by the recipient to claim the input tax credit where supplies for services are made between distinct persons?
Ans. No, this condition is not required to be complied with by the recipient. As per the proviso to sub rule (1) of Rule 37 of the CGST Rules, 2017 the value of supplies made without consideration as specified in paragraph 2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hereon.
Q11. When a banking company is not required to serially number its invoices / document for supply of its services, how will the service recipient get credit for GST on the services provided by the bank?
Ans. Under Rule 54(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017 a banking company or a financial institution including a NBFC or an insurer can issue an invoice or any other document in lieu thereof whether or not serially numbered and whether or not containing the address of the recipient but containing other information as mentioned under Rule 46. There is no restriction on the invoice/document being a consolidated invoice/document but it must bear an identification number, which need not necessarily be serially numbered. The recipient of service will get the credit for GST so long as the bank, etc. uploads the details of the invoice / document under that number with GSTIN of the recipient in its statement if FORM GSTR-1.
Q12. Is the registered person procuring goods or services from a suppl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ice, debit note or credit note for each such supply. This invoice, debit note or credit note for each such supply should be reported in the GST return of the month in which the supply takes place as per the provisions of section 12(3) or 13(3) of the CGST Act, 2017. As the import of goods would be under the cover of a bill of entry, there is no need to raise a self-invoice.
It may, however, be noted that section 9(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 / section 5(4) of the IGST Act, 2017 has been suspended vide notification No. 38/2017-Central Tax, as amended from time to time.
Q 13. For supply of taxable services, can a digitally signed invoice be issued in duplicate, with the original being marked as “Original” and the duplicate copy being marked as “Duplicate”?
Ans. In the context of digitally signed documents, the requirement of issuing original and duplicate invoices does not arise. A digitally signed invoice can be retained by the supplier and also be made available to the recipient.
Q 14

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rpose of repairs, etc. does not constitute a supply. The equipment may be moved by the Banks to the location of the third party service providers and after repairs, the equipment may be moved to a central / regional location for the purpose of programming, encryption, reconfiguration, etc. and thereafter to that place of business from where the equipment had been sent earlier. The equipment can be moved between such locations on the basis of a `delivery challan'.
Q 16. Is a “Bill of Supply” to be issued by a bank for exempt services like interest on loans and advances, inter-se sale or purchase of foreign currency amongst banks?
Ans. As per clause (c) of sub-section (3) of section 31 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 49 of the CGST Rules, 2017, there is a requirement for issuance of bill of supply for supply of exempt services by Banks. It may be noted, however, that there is no need to issue a separate bill of supply in case any invoice or document has already been issued in acco

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a separate registration for a separate business vertical, say for Bullion business, whether the requirement for reversal of 5o percent will also apply to bullion purchased by the Bank?
Ans. In terms of Section 2(94) read with Section 25(4)&(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, a person required to obtain more than one registration within a State or more than one State shall be treated as a distinct person for each such registration. Section 17(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 is applicable qua each registration and not for the Bank as a whole, provided each of the business verticals is separately registered. Therefore, a bank engaged in trading in bullion may not opt for 5o percent reversal in respect of its purchases of bullion, where it is separately registered as a business vertical.
Q 19. Where there is a supply of goods or services between registered branches of a banking company on which GST is paid, will the recipient branch/office be eligible for i00% credit of the GST charged on such supply w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d on services received from a related person / distinct person located outside India would be liable to 5o% reversal.
Q 21. Whether the provision of section 18(6) for reversal of input tax credit availed on capital goods be applicable to banks only to the extent of the input tax credit availed?
Ans. Yes. The provisions of section 18(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 for reversal of input tax credit availed on capital goods would be applicable to banks only to the extent of the input tax credit availed by it. In case the Bank opts to avail input tax credit to the extent of 5o% in terms of the second proviso to Section 17(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, reversal of credit would be in proportion to the actual credit availed by the Bank i.e. only with reference to 50% of the input tax credit availed by it on capital goods.
Q 22. Can a Bank / insurer defer the availment of input tax credit for a month or quarter and avail of the same in subsequent months?
Ans. Yes. As per section 16(4) of the CGST Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

stered person if services are provided to a registered person and the location of the recipient of services on the records of the supplier of services if services are provided to an unregistered person. Address available on records of the insurance company, which is ordinarily used for communication with the customer, may be considered as the 'Place of Supply'.
Q 24. With respect to registered customers, whether the Bank / insurance company is required to ascertain the place of consumption of service or whether the Bank can rely upon the GSTIN provided by the Customer?
Ans. The Bank / insurance company can rely upon the GSTIN provided by the customer.
Q 25. Would intermediary services provided to an offshore client and services provided by a banking company to its offshore account holders be treated as an intra-State supply or an inter-State supply for payment of GST?
Ans. Under clause (b) of section 13(8) of the IGST Act, 2017 the place of supply of such services is the location o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ied international organization or, services provided for official use of a foreign diplomatic mission or consular post in India or for personal use or for the use of the family members of diplomatic agents or career consular officers posted therein?
Ans. Yes, the bank / insurer is required to charge GST in such cases. However, as per section 55 of the CGST Act, 2017, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed, such service recipients would be entitled to claim a refund of taxes paid on the notified supplies of services received by them.
Q 29. Who is liable to comply with GST on charges levied by Overseas Correspondent Banks facilitating trade and other cross border transactions?
Ans. In this case, there are two supplies namely, from bank in India to the importer/exporter and one from the overseas correspondent banks to the bank in India. So the liability to discharge GST on such supplies will be required to be determined accordingly.
Q 30. Will the second prov

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by bank from a related person or from any of its establishments outside India in the course or furtherance of business will be supply even if imported without consideration. Therefore, where the services are supplied by a supplier without consideration to an unrelated recipient or a person other than a related or distinct person, the same would not amount to supply and not liable to GST.
Q 32. Can value of services be enhanced by invoking the CGST Rules in case of services provided by banks at a concessional / differential rate to a recipient other than 'related party' / `distinct person'?
Ans. Banks provide various services to customers for a charge. However, at times, account holders / customers are provided services free or at a concessional / differential rate. The free or concessional / differential rate is offered considering factors such as credit rating and stability of the customer, size of relationship, expected future business or the opportunity presented in the market el

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hether derivatives are liable to GST?
Ans. Section 2(101) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that 'securities' shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (h) of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA). 'Derivatives' are included in the definition of 'securities' under section 2(h)(ia) of the SCRA. In terms of section 2(ac) of SCRA, “derivative” includes
(A) a security derived from a debt instrument, share, loan, whether secured or unsecured, risk instrument or contract for differences or any other form of security;
(B) a contract which derives its value from the prices, or index of prices, of underlying securities.
The definition of 'derivatives' in SCRA is an inclusive definition. As 'derivatives' fall in the definition of securities, they are not liable to GST. However, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for provision of se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

contracts are in the nature of derivatives these qualify as `securities' as defined in Section 2(101) of the CGST Act, 2017. As securities are neither 'goods' nor 'services' as defined in the CGST Act, 2017, future contracts are not chargeable to GST. But where the future contracts have a delivery option and the settlement of contract takes place by way of actual delivery of underlying commodity/currency, then such forward contracts would be treated as normal supply of goods and liable to GST.
Further, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for supply of service and chargeable to GST.
Q 37. Would forward contracts in commodities or currencies be within the ambit of definition of `supply'?
Ans. A forward contract is an agreement, executed, to purchase or sell a pre­determined amount of a commodity or currency at a pre-determined future date at a pre-determined pri

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

What is the nature of income earned / expended in instruments like repos and reverse repos and is such income taxable under GST?
Ans. Section 45U(c) of the RBI Act, 1934 defines 'repos' as an instrument for borrowing funds by selling securities with an agreement to repurchase the securities on a mutually agreed future date at an agreed price which includes interest for the funds borrowed. Section 45U (d) of the RBI Act, 1934 defines `reverse repos' as an instrument for lending funds by buying securities with an agreement to re-sell the securities on a mutually agreed future date at an agreed price which includes interest for the funds lent. Repos and reverse repos are financial instruments of short term call money market that are normally used by banks to borrow from or lend money to RBI.
The margins, called the repo rate or reverse repo rate, in such transactions are nothing but interest charged for lending or borrowing of money. Thus they have the characteristics of loans and depos

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ting to 'services by way of extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as consideration is represented by way of interest or discount' and is not liable to GST [serial no. 27 of the table of notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017, as amended].
Further, promissory note is included in the definition of 'money' as given in clause (75) of Section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017 and hence not liable to GST.
However, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for supply of services and chargeable to GST.
Q 40. Whether assignment or sale of secured or unsecured debts is liable to GST?
Ans. Section 2(52) of the CGST Act, 2017 defines 'goods' to mean every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim. Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017 lists activities or transactions which shall be treated neither as a supply of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

emption?
Ans. No. The services of loans, advances or deposits are exempt in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount. Any charges or amounts collected over and above the interest or discount would represent taxable consideration and hence liable to GST.
Q 43. To what extent is invoice discounting or cheque discounting or any other similar form of discounting exempt under GST?
Ans. Discounting of invoices or cheques falls within the meaning of “services by way of extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount”. Such discounting is exempt from payment of GST, as such discounting is nothing but a manner of extending a credit facility or a loan.
However, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for supply of service and chargeable to GST.
Q 44. Is interest on debt instrum

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

finance lease transaction is taxable under GST?
Ans. A finance lease is a method of borrowing against the asset. The interest represents the time value of the money expended by the Bank in financing the asset. Services by way of extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount (other than interest involved in credit card services) is exempt. But, in a financial lease the ownership of the asset is with the bank. In essence, it is a 'purchase the asset and lend it further' transaction for bank. Therefore, neither the services are purely in the nature of extending loans nor the consideration for a financial lease is purely in the nature of interest. Thus, interest on finance lease transactions will be taxable under GST.
Q 48. Where GST is charged on a supply of service and the amounts due from the customer become irrecoverable as a bad debt in commercial practice, would such GST paid on accrual basis be refundable to the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

constitute a supply of service.
Q 50. Which services will qualify as services provided to 'account holder' as per Section 13(8) of the IGST Act, 2017?
Ans. The place of supply of services supplied by a banking company located in India to account holders located outside India is the location of the service provider i.e. banking company.
“Account” has been defined in Explanation (a) to section 13(8) of the IGST Act, 2017 to mean an account which bears interest to the depositor, and includes a non-resident external (NRE) account and a non-resident ordinary (NRO) account.
Services provided to holders of demand deposits, term deposits, NRE account and NRO account outside India will be covered by the definition of account referred to above. Examples of such services are:
(i) services linked to or requiring opening and operation of bank accounts, such as, lending and deposits;
(ii) transfer of money including telegraphic transfer, mail transfer, electronic transfer etc.
Q 51. Which se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

advice on corporate restructuring and strategy;
(vi) banker to an issue service.
In case of any service which does not qualify as service provided to an account holder, the place of supply for such services shall be the location of the recipient of services.
Q 52. What is the location of the supplier in case of banking and other financial services where multiple locations are involved in providing the services to a customer?
Ans. Banking services emanate from the bank account opened by a customer with the branch of a bank or through a contractual relationship between the branch of a bank and the customer. The branch holding the customer's account is referred to as the 'Account Branch' or the 'Home Branch'. An account would include all types of accounts – viz. interest bearing, non- interest bearing, loan account, deposit account, etc. In the present day of “anywhere banking”, the customer avails banking services through mobile/ internet banking or by visiting any branch of the bank

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n determining the taxability of such transactions.
The definition of 'goods' and 'services' in Section 2(52) and Section 2(102) of the CGST Act, 2017 specifically excludes money and securities respectively. `Money' has been defined in Section 2(75) of the CGST Act, 2017 to include instruments like cheques, drafts, pay orders, promissory notes, letters of credit, etc.
Therefore, activities that are only transactions in such instruments would be outside the definition of service. This would include transactions in Commercial Paper (`CP') and Certificate of Deposit (`CD') (as they are in the nature of promissory notes), issuance of drafts or letters of credit, etc.
While these transactions would be outside the ambit of supply, the related activity, for which a separate consideration is charged, would be chargeable to GST if other elements of taxability are present. Therefore, GST would be levied on service charges normally charged for various transactions in money including charges for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er-State supply of services between distinct establishments (as per section 7(5)(a) read with Explanation to section 8 of the IGST Act, 2017), and will be taxable in India, as the location of the supplier is in India and the place of supply is outside India. Such services will not be treated as exports in view of the sub-clause (v) of section 2(6) of the IGST Act, 2017 read with Explanation 1 to section 8 of the IGST Act, 2017.
Q 55. Will the management oversight or stewardship activities performed in relation to business operations by the Head Office of a Bank to a Branch in India be considered as a supply of services by the Head Office even when there is no consideration charged by the Head Office, nor any expenditure recorded in the books of account of the Branches?
Ans. As per Schedule – I to the CGST Act, 2017, supply of services between distinct entities will be a taxable supply even in absence of a consideration.
Q 56. If tax is payable on provision of management oversight or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of gold from the overseas supplier?
Ans. The dispatch of gold by the principal from a place outside India to the Bank in India is deemed to be a supply in terms of para 3 of Schedule I to the CGST Act, 2017. Accordingly, IGST will be payable on such import of gold by the Nominated Bank at the time of clearance of gold by the Customs.
Q 58. Will there be another liability for payment of GST when the gold (metal) is appropriated or drawn from the consignment stock by the Nominated Bank?
Ans. The supply of gold (metal) is already deemed to have taken place in terms of para 3 of Schedule I of the CGST Act, 2017 when the same was despatched by the overseas supplier to the Nominated Bank. Since the supply has already taken place, there will not be another supply when the gold is drawn or appropriated by the Nominated Bank from the stock. There will, therefore, not be another levy of GST.
Q 59. In the case of gold (metal) loan, whether the supply of gold (metal) to the jeweller will be d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ould issue debit or credit notes for the difference in the price as per the original invoice and the price finally fixed, along with applicable GST.
Q 60. Whether tax is payable on interest charged by the Banks on the outstanding amount of gold (metal) loan?
Ans. The Gold (Metal) Loan Scheme is a means of financing. The jewellers can purchase gold (metal) from the Banks on outright basis on payment of the price. The gold (metal) loan only provides an option to the jeweller to avail a loan and pay for gold (metal) at a future date. For this facility, the jeweller pays interest to the Bank. The grant of loan and levy of interest is dependent on the purchase of gold, and therefore, part of the same transaction or facility; therefore the interest, which is the consideration, will not be exempt as per provisions of section 15(2)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Q 61. What will be the place of supply in cases where the account is held in a bank in one State but some services are availed in a dif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

action processing fees levied for such takeover of loans, but not on the interest component (as interest is exempted).
Q 63. Whether GST will be levied on sale of re-possessed asset?
Ans. Sale of repossessed asset falls within the scope of supply and will be chargeable to GST.
Q 64. Whether GST will be levied on interchange fees on card settlement fees paid/shared by banks?
Ans. Fees charged for card settlement is a consideration which is part of a separate transaction between the banks which are parties to this transaction and shall be liable to GST. This is a B2B supply and credit of this transaction is available.
Q 65. What is the leviability of GST on securitization transactions undertaken by banks?
Ans. Securitized assets are in the nature of securities and hence not liable to GST. However, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for provision of services rela

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the end of the month for the supply of services received during the month.
Q. 68. Whether insurance policies issued to Non-Resident Indians, where the premium is paid through the Non- Resident External Bank account, will be 'export of services'? Would the insurance premiums be taxable in cases where the same is not received in convertible foreign exchange or from the NRE Accounts?
Ans. No. The amounts paid from the Non-Resident External Accounts are paid in Indian Rupees and are not received in convertible foreign exchange. Therefore, the conditions for export of services as provided under section 2(6) of IGST Act, 2017 are not satisfied. Life Insurance services in such cases would be treated as inter-State supplies and subject to GST.
Q. 69. Will the requirements of Letter of Undertaking or Bond be required to be complied with in the case of Life Insurance Premium where the conditions of export of services are satisfied before or at the time of supply of the Life Insurance Service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

emium;
(c) Other charges including ULIP charges – At the time of levy or recovery of the charges from the policyholder.
Q. 71. When service tax was paid on or before 30th June, 2017 for the services to be provided, but subsequently not provided, whether refund claim can be made under Section 142(5) of the CGST Act?
Ans. Section 142(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 specifically provides for refund of tax paid under the Finance Act, 1994 in respect of services not provided. The same shall be disposed off in accordance with the provisions of the Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994.
Q. 72. Can the input tax credit of Krishi Kalyan Cess be carried forward?
Ans. No. It is not permitted in terms of section 140(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 117(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Q. 73. In the case of group insurance policies, a Master Policy is issued; the beneficiaries of the Master Policy may be located in more than one State. In such cases, what will be the place of supply of services?
Ans

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lement?
Ans. Yes, ITC will be allowed on services of motor garage used by an insurance company for claim settlement.
Q. 76. Whether the service provided by the re-insurance company to an insurer will be treated as a supply?
Ans. The service of re-insurance falls within the scope of supply, and is chargeable to GST.
STOCK BROKING SERVICES
Q. 77. In the case of stock broking, whether stamp duty or securities transaction tax or other Central or State taxes would be considered as a part of the value of supply as prescribed under Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017, for levy of GST?
Ans. GST is not payable by the stock brokers on these recoveries as long as the conditions of pure agent as provided in Rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017 are met. If not, then valuation will be done as per section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 27 of CGST Rules, 2017.
Q. 78. Is brokerage earned in stock broking service liable to Goods and Services Tax?
Ans. Yes. Since the stock brokers are engaged in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ired to be updated with the Stock Exchange as part of the “Unique Client Code” details. Therefore, in case of domestic supplies of such services, address on record with the stock brokers shall be the “location of the recipient of services” in terms of section 12(12) of the IGST Act, 2017. However, in cases where the the location of the recipient is outside India, the place of supply shall be determined as per section 13(8) of the IGST Act, 2017 i.e. as an intermediary.
Q.82. Do stock brokers fall in the definition of “intermediary” under section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017?
Ans. Yes. Since stock brokers arrange the supply of securities between two or more persons, stock brokers would be covered by the definition of “intermediary”
Q.83. Would sub-brokers/ Authorized Persons fall in the definition of “agent” under Section 2(5) of the CGST Act, 2017? What would be the registration requirement for subbrokers/ Authorized Persons in the context of the Goods and Services Tax Regime?
Ans.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the definition of “agent” under the CGST Act, 2017.
Q.84. What is the “place of business” for a stock broker?
Ans. Section 2(85) of the CGST Act, 2017 defines “place of business” to include:
(i) a place from where the business is ordinarily carried on, and includes a warehouse, a godown or any other place where a taxable person stores his goods, supplies or receives goods or services or both; or
(ii) a place where a taxable person maintains his books of account; or
(iii) a place where a taxable person is engaged in business through an agent, by whatever name called.
In case of operations of a stock broker, it is required by law that all transactions would be via screen based trading on the Stock Exchanges. Therefore, the following would be the “place of business” in case of stock brokers:
(i) All the branches of the stock broker where the Stock Exchange Trading terminals are located and where trade is carried out on behalf of clients;
(ii) Main office/ Head office/ Registered

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

services. Thus such a supply will be treated as an intra-State supply and would be subject to Central tax and State tax / Union territory tax, as the case may be.
Q.86. What will be the effect if we have paid
(i) Integrated tax instead of Central tax and State tax / Union territory tax?
(ii) Central tax and State tax / Union territory tax instead of Integrated tax?
Ans. Under section 19(1) of the IGST Act, 2017 “a registered person who has paid integrated tax on a supply considered by him to be an inter-State supply, but which is subsequently held to be an intra-State supply, shall be granted refund of the amount of integrated tax so paid in such manner and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed”.
Under section 19(2) of the IGST Act, 2017 “a registered person who has paid Central tax and State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, on a transaction considered by him to be an intra-State supply, but which is subsequently held to be an inter-State supply, shall no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed by the clients to the stock brokers in advance of the potential orders/ trades that would lead to margin/ settlement obligations. All such advances will fall in the category of deposit under the proviso to section 2(31) of the CGST Act, 2017 and thus will not be considered as payment made for such supply unless the stock broker applies such deposit as consideration for the said supply in his books of accounts.
Q.88. Can the stock broker continue to issue bills and contracts under the normal Stock Exchange mechanism and issue a monthly tax invoice for the purpose of Goods and Services Tax?
Ans. The stock broker can issue bills and contracts under the normal Stock Exchange mechanism mentioning the GST amount but will have to issue a tax invoice as envisaged under Section 31(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 47 of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Q.89. What is considered as 'securities' under the Goods and Services Tax Act? Are they taxable under GST?
Ans. Section 2(101) of the CGST Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rvices, they fall in the definition of “non-taxable supply” under section 2(78) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Q.90. Stock brokers provide many other services like Depository Participant Services / Portfolio Management Services, etc. Do they require registration as separate Business Verticals?
Ans. Section 2(18) of the CGST Act, 2017 defines “business vertical” to mean “a distinguishable component of an enterprise that is engaged in the supply of individual goods or services or a group of related goods or services which is subject to risks and returns that are different from those of the other business verticals.
Explanation.For the purposes of this clause, factors that should be considered in determining whether goods or services are related include
(i) the nature of the goods or services;
(ii) the nature of the production processes;
(iii) the type or class of customers for the goods or services;
(iv) the methods used to distribute the goods or supply of services; and
(v) the nature o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TRANS-2 Details

TRANS-2 Details
Query (Issue) Started By: – SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR Dated:- 4-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 7-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
To file Trans-2 due date is 30th June-18
Who is eligible to file trans-2
We have file Trans-1 for traders stock details.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
The TRAN-2 is to be filed under Rule 117 (4) (b) (iii), same is given below:-
“(iii) The registered person availing of this scheme and having furnished the details of stock held by him in accordance with the provisions of clause (b) of sub-rule (2), submits a statement in FORM GST TRAN 2 by 31st March 2018, or within such period as extended by the Commissioner, on the recommendations of the Council, for each of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Power Lines and Transformers Work Classed as Indivisible Contract, Subject to 12% IGST, Says AAR.

Power Lines and Transformers Work Classed as Indivisible Contract, Subject to 12% IGST, Says AAR.
Case-Laws
GST
Nature of supply – divisible contract [Supply of goods & Supply of Services] or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Waiver the late fee payable under section 47 of the said Act for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B.

Waiver the late fee payable under section 47 of the said Act for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B.
S.O.75/P.A.5/2017/S.128/2018 Dated:- 4-6-2018 Punjab SGST
GST – States
Punjab SGST
Punjab SGST
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE AND TAXATION
(EXCISE AND TAXATION-II BRANCH)
NOTIFICATION
The 4th June, 2018
No. S.O.75/P.A.5/2017/S.128/2018.-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Punjab Act No.5 of 20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
G.S.R.38/P.A.5/2017/S.164/Amd.(14)/2018 Dated:- 4-6-2018 Punjab SGST
GST – States
Punjab SGST
Punjab SGST
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE AND TAXATION
(EXCISE AND TAXATION-II BRANCH)
NOTIFICATION
The 4th June, 2018
No. G.S.R.38/P.A.5/2017/S.164/Amd.(14)/2018.-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Punjab Act No.5 of 2017), and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Governor of Punjab, on the recommendations of the Council, is pleased to make the following rules further to amend the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
RULES
1. (1) These rules may be called the Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) They shall be deemed to have come into force on and with effect from the 18th April, 2018.
2. In the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said rul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall be credited to the Fund:
Provided that an amount equivalent to fifty per cent. of the amount of integrated tax determined under sub-section (5) of section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, read with section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, shall be deposited in the Fund.
(2) Where any amount, having been credited to the Fund, is ordered or directed to be paid to any claimant by the proper officer, appellate authority or court, the same shall be paid from the Fund.
(3) Accounts of the Fund maintained by the Central Government shall be subject to audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
(4) The Government shall, by an order, constitute a Standing Committee (hereinafter referred to as the 'Committee') with a Chairman, a Vice-Chairman, a Member Secretary and such other members as it may deem fit and the Committee shall make recommendations for proper utilization of the money cred

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re any applicant to produce before it, or before a duly authorised officer of the State Government, as the case may be, such books, accounts, documents, instruments, or commodities in custody and control of the applicant, as may be necessary for proper evaluation of the application;
(c) to require any applicant to allow entry and inspection of any premises, from which activities claimed to be for the welfare of consumers are stated to be carried on, to a duly authorised officer of the State Government, as the case may be;
(d) to get the accounts of the applicants audited, for ensuring proper utilisation of the grant;
(e) to require any applicant, in case of any default, or suppression of material information on his part, to refund in lump-sum along with accrued interest, the sanctioned grant to the Committee, and to be subject to prosecution under the Act;
(f) to recover any sum due from any applicant in accordance with the provisions of the Act;
(g) to require any applicant,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he Committee shall make recommendations-
(a) for making available grants to any applicant;
(b) for investment of the money available in the Fund;
(c) for making available grants (on selective basis) for reimbursing legal expenses incurred by a complainant, or class of complainants in a consumer dispute, after its final adjudication;
(d) for making available grants for any other purpose recommended by the Central Consumer Protection Council (as may be considered appropriate by the Committee);
(e) for making available up to 50% of the funds credited to the Fund each year, for publicity/ consumer awareness on GST, provided the availability of funds for consumer welfare activities of the Department of Consumer Affairs is not less than twenty five crore rupees per annum.
Explanation.- For the purposes of this rule,
(a) 'applicant' means,
(i) the Central Government or State Government;
(ii) regulatory authorities or autonomous bodies constituted under an Act of Parliament

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

enses incurred by him in a case instituted by him in a consumer dispute redressal agency;
(b) 'application' means an application in the form as specified by the Standing Committee from time to time;
(c) 'Central Consumer Protection Council' means the Central Consumer Protection Council, established under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986), for promotion and protection of rights of consumers;
(d) 'Committee' means the Committee constituted under sub-rule (4);
(e) 'consumer' has the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986), and includes consumer of goods on which central tax has been paid;
(f) 'Fund' means the Fund established by the State Government under section 57 of the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017;
(g) 'proper officer' means the officer having the power under the Act to make an order that the whole

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nvoice/Bill of Entry
Description of inputs held in stock, inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock and capital goods/plant and machinery
Unit Quantity Code (UQC)
Qty
Value (As adjusted by debit/credit note)
Input tax credit/Tax payable (whichever is higher) (Rs.)
Central tax
State Union territory tax
Integrated tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
8 (a) Inputs held in stock (where invoice is available)
8 (b) Inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock (where invoice is available)
8 (c) Capital goods/plant and machinery held in stock
8 (d) Inputs held in stock or inputs as contained in semi-finished /finished goods held in stock (where invoice not available)
9. Amount of tax payable and paid (based on Table 8)
Sr. No.
Description
ITC reversible/ Tax payable
Tax paid along with application cancellation of registration (GST REG-16)
Balance payable (3-4)
Amount paid through debit to electronic cash ledger
Amount

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g tax under section 10;
(iii) Non-resident taxable person;
(iv) Persons required to deduct tax at source under section 51; and
(v) Persons required to collect tax at source under section 52.
2. Details of stock of inputs, inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods and stock of capital goods/plant and machiner on which input tax credit has been availed.
3. Following points need to be taken care of while providing details of stock at Sl. No.8:
(i) where the tax invoices related to the inputs held in stock or inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock are not available, the registered person shall estimate the amount under sub-rule (3) of rule 44 based on prevailing market price of the goods;
(ii) in case of capital goods/ plant and machinery, the value should be the invoice value reduced by 1/60th per month or part thereof from the date of invoice/purchase taking useful life as five years.
4. The details furnished in accordance with sub-rule (3)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Qmax Assay And Hallmarks Versus The Intelligence Officer (IB) Commercial Taxes, The State Tax Officer,

Qmax Assay And Hallmarks Versus The Intelligence Officer (IB) Commercial Taxes, The State Tax Officer,
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1823 – KERLA HIGH COURT – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 792 (Ker.)
KERLA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 4-6-2018
W. P. (C). No. 15710 of 2018
GST
SHRI P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
Petitioner By: Advs. Sri. S. Anil Kumar (Trivandrum) Sri. Saju. K. Perutty
Respondent By: R8 BY Adv. Sri. Harisankar V. Menon R8 BY Adv. Smt. Meera V. Menon R8 By Adv. Smt. K. Krishna Raddl.6, R7 & 9 -R 12 BY Adv. Sri. R. Muralidharan (Aroor) R140 By Adv. K R4, R5 BY Adv. Sri. A. Kumar R4, R5 By Adv. SMTG. Mini(1748) By Sri. V.K. Shamsudeen (SR.GP) By Sr. Government Pleader: Sri. V.K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
In terms of Exts.P9 and P9(a) orders,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

payment of applicable tax, interest and penalty payable, as the case may be. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 140 of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Rules (the Rules) provides that the seized articles may be released on a provisional basis upon execution of a bond for the value of the goods in FORM GST INS-04 and furnishing of a security in the form of bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of applicable tax, interest and penalty payable. In the light of the aforesaid provisions, the petitioner is entitled to claim release of the seized articles.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is unable to furnish bank guarantee in terms of sub-rule (1) of Rule 140 of the Rules. It was, however, pointed out that the seized articles

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Dinesh Kumar Agrawal

In Re: Dinesh Kumar Agrawal
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1691 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. 404 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 4-6-2018
GST-ARA-36/2017-18/B-43
GST
Shri B.V. Borhade and Shri Pankaj Kumar, Member
No. GST-ARA-36/2017-18/B-43
Mumbai, dt. 04/06/2018
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017)
1. The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Dinesh Kumar Agrawal, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :
Question No. 1 Whether Standalone Contract of transportation merits classification under Service code 9965 and whether same is exempt under Entry No. 18 of Notification No. 12/2017-CentraI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

same is exempt under Entry No. 18 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017?
Question No. 5 Whether supply of services namely 'loading of goods at the premises of the supplier, transportation in own/hired trucks to the project site, unloading and handling of goods at project site and in-transit insurance' under EPC Contract merits classification under Service code 9965 and whether same is exempt under Entry No. 18 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017?
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST Act/MGST Act would be m

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er appropriate HSN heading and priced separately and billed to the customer as per supply schedule (itemized billing). In case an item is not supplied, same is not billed to the customer.
Split Contract: Many a times, parties enter two separate contract, one for the supply of goods and materials (Supply Contract) and another for services (Service Contract). Under the Supply Contract, each line item is classified under appropriate HSN heading is priced separately and contractor do itemized billing to the customer. Similarly, for each component of the Service Contract, contractor do itemized billing to the customer. Supply Contract and Service Contract have separate consideration but also contains cross-fall breach clause in the contracts which ensure that the performance of both contracts are treated as a single-point responsibility and non-performance of any portion of any contract is treated as a breach of the other contract also.
Typically, the scope of works under the EPC Contract

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods and insurance services from the insurance companies for in-transit insurance of goods.
The case was taken up for preliminary hearing on 03/04/2018 with respect admissibility of the present application. Shri. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal an individual and applicant appeared and argued the matter with respect to facts having bearing on the questions on which Advance Ruling is required as above. On hearing the applicant it was specifically informed to Shri. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal that his queries were very general and not having any specific details in respect to his proposed transaction and that there was not proposed draft contract. Shri. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal agreed to submit copies of draft contract at the earliest. When the matter was called for Final hearing Shri. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal submitted draft contract which is the nature of EPC contract. Applicant was also informed to submit written say within a week else the final plant as proposed in the EPC contract should not be treated as i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ract for Solar Power Plant
B. Nature and scope of works under PGCIL Bid.
Bid document comprises of the following section:
(i) Section – INB (Instruction to bidders) – 20 pages (Page 35 to 54)
(ii) Section – GCC (General Terms and Conditions of Contract) – (page 55 to 90)
(iii) Clarification on GST – 2 pages (page 91-92).
Following are the relevant clauses in the bid documents:
1.8 of GCC – Works – 'Works' shall mean and include the furnishing of equipment/materials at site and if required, supervision of unloading, storage, handling at site, erection, testing & commissioning and putting into satisfactory operation as defined in the Contract.
1.11 of GCC – Contract Price – The term 'Contract Price' shall mean the lump sum price quoted by the Contractor in his bid with additions and/or deletions as may be agreed and incorporated in the Letter of Award, for the entire scope of the works.
24.1 of GCC – Change of Quantity – During the execution of the Contract, the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

prepare and submit to the Engineer for approval, a break-up of the Contract Price. This Contract Price break-up shall be interlinked with the agreed detailed PERT network of the Contractor setting forth his starting and completion dates for the various key phases of Works prepared as per condition in Clause 12.0 of this Section GCC of Volume-I. Any payment under the Contract shall be made only after the Contractor's price break-up is approved by the Engineer. The aggregate sum of the Contractor's price break-up shall be equal to the lump-sum Contract Price. A Price Breakup over valuing those items of supply which will be shipped first will not be accepted.
34.7.3 of GCC – Inland transportation & Insurance – Inland transportation (including port handing) and inland insurance shall be paid to the Contractor on pro-rata to the value of the equipment received at site and on production of the invoices by the Contractor. However, wherever equipment wise inland transportation charge

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

conservation of equipment at the site;
f. pre-assembly, if any, erection, testing and commissioning of all the equipment;
g. reliability tests and performance and guarantee tests on completion of commissioning; and
h. furnishing of spares.
12.2 of INB – Bid Price – The Bidder shall also furnish the price break-down in the appropriate schedules of Bid Form to indicate the following:
i. Ex-works price of the equipment/materials (including tools and tackles etc.)
ii. Charges for inland transportation (including port handling) and insurance for delivery of the equipment/materials up to their final destinations.
iii. Lump-sum charges towards unloading, storage, insurance, erection, testing & commissioning.
iv. Price break-up for spares in line with Clause 23.0 of this Section.
v. Sales Tax and any other levies legally payable on the transactions between the Owner and the Bidder,
vi. Any other charges as per the requirement of Special Conditions of Contract/Technical Specifications

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

heavy blocks prevent hobbling of mounting structures against winds, rains and storms.
Step 3: Module Mounting Structure Installation: In the third step, the execution team mounts the module mounting structures on the civil foundations. The mounting structure is made of galvanized steel which interwove various blocks horizontally and also provide vertical support to the panels.
Step 4: Module Installation: Once the module mounting structures are in place, solar modules (panels) are bolted onto the structures.
Step 5: Cabling: Solar modules are connected in series with DC cables to the inverter, and with AC cables from the inverter to the evacuation point (customer's LT panel).
Step 6: Inverter Connection and Grid Synchronization: Once the installation is ready, the inverter is charged, and begins synchronizing the solar power with the customer's existing electrical grid.
Step 7: Seamless Power Distribution: Lastly, seamless power distribution begins as soon as the electrica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e contract: Transportation -The Contractor shall at its own risk and expense, be fully responsible for loading, transportation, delivery to the Project Site and unloading of the Equipment. The cost of transit insurance, if any, should be borne by the Contractor.
14.1 of the contract: Contract Price – Payment shall made at the unit rate stated in the Bill of Quantities at net actual quantity of each item delivered at Project Site. Such payment shall constitute full compensation for furnishing all Equipment and labour including testing and all other incidentals necessary to complete the Project. Any quantities which is set out in the Bill of Quantities are estimated quantities and are not to be taken as the actual and correct quantities.
The Bill of Quantities list out name of the equipment, specifications, estimated quantity, price per unit and total price. It also lists out installation cost for each activity and transportation charges payable separately.
Issues for consideration:

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;land' and 'building' from being taxed. However, this exemption is not extended 'plant and machinery' which was under the current regime at par with 'land' and 'building' and all together constituting 'immovable property'. The specific listing under the Schedules, reflects on a plausible legislative intent to make a distinction between land and building on one hand and plant and machinery on another.
The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) vide 37B Order 58/1/2002 – CX dated 15 January 2002 has clarified that if the items assembled or erected at site and attached by foundation to earth cannot be dismantled without substantial damage to its components and thus cannot be reassembled, then the items would be considered as immoveable.
In the case of EPC contract for supply of roof top solar power plant, as explained above, solar panels are mounted on steel mounting structures which are mounted on the concrete blocks. Each and every item

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

contract, this ruling will not be applicable.
E. Composite supply
As per Section 2(30) of the Act, “composite supply” means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply.
Illustration.- Where goods are packed and transported with insurance, the supply of goods, packing materials, transport and insurance is a composite supply and supply of goods is a principal supply.
Applicant understand that where a single price is charged for supply of goods, packing materials, transport and insurance, it would be considered as composite supply and tax will be payable at the rate applicable to principal supply.
However, there is ambiguity on taxability when the Applicant charges separate price for transport and insurance. The customer is at liberty to t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the classification of the goods. However, in as much as transportation charges are concerned, the Applicant submits that:
(i) Tax is payable on transportation of goods only if Goods Transport Agency (GTA) is involve in the transportation;
(ii) In the present case, the Applicant don't issue any consignment note and therefore, he cannot be treated as GTA;
(iii) Service by way of transportation of goods by road except by GTA is exempt
(iv) Thus, as the Applicant is not a GTA, no tax should be payable on the transportation charge received from the customer,
In light of the above, the Applicant prays the authority to issue rulings.
Thus having regards to written submission dt. 08/05/2018 and the draft contract the question raised before this is reframed for consideration as below –
“Whether transportation charges received by the applicant are liable to GST, specially when the applicant is not a goods transport agency (GTA)”.
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for Preliminary hea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

en up by the authority for any decision or order. It was specifically pointed out to Sh. Dinesh Kumar Agrawal that this authority will be taking up the case for decision only in respect of EPC contracts only, copies of draft/proposed sub-contracts which the applicant has provided. Further it was requested to applicant to give a written up within one week of today, as to why the final plant of proposed in EPC contracts should not be treated as immovable property. Jurisdictional Officer, Sh. R.T. Nikam, Sales Tax Officer appeared and made written submission also which is considered for the fair decision.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We have heard Shri. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal on the issue and have carefully gone through the written submission, and the proposed activity represented by draft agreement for “Engineering, procurement and Solar Power Plant” i.e. roof top photovoltaic (PV). In short, applicants submission is that he is not a goods transport agency (GTA) as he is not issuing any consignment

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ansportation of equipment from vendors site to the project site including transit insurance;
1.1.4 Loading, unloading and storage of the equipment;
1.1.5 Assembly and erection of equipment inc1uding civil works required for such erection;
1.1.6 Test and commissioning of the project
1.1.7 Maintenance
12 Transfer of Title:
12.1 Notwithstanding the manner of issuance of invoices as stipulated in this Agreement, the Developer will obtain the title in goods only upon successful installation and commissioning of the Solar Power Project.
14 Contract Price and Payment:
14.1 Contract Price
Payment shall be made at the unit rate stated in the Bill of Quantities at net actual quantity of each item delivered at Project Site. Such payment shall constitute full compensation for furnishing all Equipment and labour including testing and all other incidentals necessary to complete the Project. Any quantities which is set out in the Bill of Quantities are estimated and are not to be taken as th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tract as a whole to ascertain the true/correct nature of transaction.
From the co-joint reading of the clauses of the agreement as mentioned above especially clause No.10 it can be safely concluded that the contract is a single contract. As such this agreement for Engineering Procurement and construction of Solar Power plant constitute composite supply in the nature of Works Contract. Thus impugned Supplies constitute Works Contract.
The next issue to be decided is whether this composite supplies constitute Works Contract as defined U/s 2(119) of the GST Act. On this issue applicant submits that the contract is for supply of roof top Solar Plant which involves solar panels which are mounted on steel structures fixed on the roof of building. The steps involved in this regard are already mentioned above in the written submission dated 08/05/2018. He lastly submits that every item can be dismantled and disassembled without any damage and relocated to another site and as such supply of R

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l data and geotechnical data and other background information provided by the developer.
All the above clauses suggest that the project is the ground mounted Solar Power Plant and not exclusively the Roof Top Mounted Solar Power Plant as claimed by the applicant. Even in a case where it is Roof Top Mounted Solar Power Plant, we find that the intent in operationalising Solar Power Plant, on a Roof Top is to set even it up as an immovable property which involves civil work which would be very clear from plethora of judgments of Hon. Supreme Court' and Hon. High Courts which help in understanding the term immovable property. One such decision is of the T.T.G. Industries Ltd. v, CCE, (2004) 4 SCC 751. In this case Court has observed as below:-
18. The core question that still survives for consideration is whether (he processes undertaken by the appellant at Bhilai for the erection of mudguns and drilling machines resulted in the emergence of goods leviable to excise duty or whether i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tanks were connected with pump house with pipes for pumping petroleum products into the tank and sending them back to the pump house. The question arose in the context of ascertaining the rateable value of the structures under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. The High Court held that the tanks are neither structure nor a building nor land under the Act. While allowing the appeal this Court observed: (SCC p. 33, para 32)
“32. The tanks, though, are resting on earth on their own weight without being fixed with nuts and bolts, they have permanently been erected without being shifted from place to place. Permanency is the test. The chattel whether is movable to another place of use in the same position or liable to be dismantled and re-erected at the latter place? If the answer is yes to tile former it must be a movable property and thereby it must be held that it is not attached to the earth. If the answer is yes to the latter it is attached to the earth.”
22. Applying the permane

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nctions. We are not impressed by this reasoning, because it ignores the evidence brought on record as to the nature of processes employed in the erection of the machine, the manner in which it is installed and rendered functional, and other relevant facts which may lead one to conclude that what emerged as a result was not merely a machine hut something which is in the nature of being immovable, and if required to be moved, cannot be moved without first dismantling it, and then re-erecting it at some other place. Some of the other decisions which we shall hereafter notice clarify the position further.
24. In Quality Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. v. CCE [(1995) 2 SCC 372 : (1995) 75 ELT 17] the facts were that a tube mill and welding head were erected and installed by the appellant, a manufacturer of steel pipes and tubes, by purchasing certain items of plant and machinery in market and embedding them to earth and installing them to form a part of the tube mill and purchasing certain components

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eaning of the Act nor u can be said to be capable of being brought to the market for being bought and sold. Therefore, both the tests, as explained by this Court, were not satisfied in the case of appellant as the tube mill or welding head having been erected and installed in the premises and embedded lo earth ceased to be goods within meaning of Section 3 of the Act.”
25. In Mittal Engg. Works (P) Ltd. v. CCE [(1997) 1 SCC 203 : (1996) 88 ELT 622] this Court was concerned with the exigibility to duly of mono vertical crystallisers which are used in sugar factories to exhaust molasses of sugar. The material on record described the functions and manufacturing process. A mono vertical ctystalliser is fixed on a solid RCC slab having a load-bearing capacity of about 30 tons per square metre. It is assembled at site in different sections and consists of bottom plates, tanks, coils, drive frames, supports, plates, etc. The aforesaid pails were cleared from the premises of the appellants an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on at the site of the sugar factory. It is not capable of being sold as it is, without anything more. This Court. therefore, concluded that mono vertical ctystallisers are not “goods” within the meaning of the Act and. Therefore, not exigible to excise duty. In Triveni Engg. & Industries Ltd. v. CCE [(2000) 7 SCC 29 (2000) 120 ELT 273] a question arose regarding excitability of turbo alternator, in the facts of that case, it was held that installation or erection of turbo alternator on a concrete base specially constructed on the land cannot be treated as a common base and, therefore, it follows that installation or erection of turbo alternator on the platform constructed on the land would be immovable property, as such it cannot be an excisable goods falling within the meaning of Heading 85 02. In reaching this conclusion this Court considered the earlier judgments of this Court in Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay (1991 Supp (2) SCC 18]. Quality Steel Tubes 1(1995) 2 SCC 372: (1995)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Paper Mills Ltd. (1998) 1 SCC 400 (1998) 97 ELT 3] must be viewed in the light of the findings recorded by CEGAT therein, that the whole purpose behind attaching the machine to a concrete base was to prevent wobbling of the machine and to secure maximum operational efficiency and also safety. In view of those findings it was not possible to hold that the machinery assembled and erected by the appellant at its factory site was immovable property as something attached to the earth like a building or a tree.
27. Keeping in view the principles laid down in the judgments noticed above, and having regard to the facts of this case, we have no doubt in our mind that the mudguns and the drilling machines erected at site by the appellant on a specially made concrete platform at a level of 25 feet above the ground on a base plate secured to the concrete platform, brought into existence not excisable goods but immovable property which could not be shifted without first dismantling it and then re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

from one place to another, nor is it practicable to shift them frequently. Counsel for the appellant submitted before us that once they are erected and assembled they continue to operate from where they are positioned till such time as they are worn out or discarded. According to him they really become a component of the plant and machinery because without their aid a blast furnace cannot operate. It is not necessary for us to express any opinion as to whether the mudguns and the drilling machines are really a component of the plant and machinery of the steel plant, but we are satisfied that having regard to the manner in which these machines are erected and installed upon concrete structures, they do not answer the description of “goods” within the meaning of the term in the Excise Act.
Thus, it can be seen that the Hon. Supreme Court while holding the machines as immovable property took into account facts such that the machines could not be shifted without first dismantling it and t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gistered with the Central Excise Department nor is it disputed that the proprietary concern is a small-scale industrial unit that is availing exemption from payment of duty in terms of the relevant exemption notification.
4. M/s Solidmec Equipments Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Solidmec”. for short), the fifth unit with which we are concerned in the present appeals is a marketing company engaged in the manufacture of asphalt drum/hot mix plants at the sites provided by the purchasers of such plants. It is common ground that Solidmec advertises its products and undertakes contracts for supplying, erection, commissioning and after-sale services relating thereto. It is also admitted that all the five concerns referred to above are closely held by Shri Hasmukhbhai, his brothers and the members of their families.
5. An inspection of the factories of the respondents by a team of officers from the Central Excise. Preventing Wing, Headquarters, Ahmedabad, led to the issue of a notice dat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed that Solidmec was engaged in the manufacturing of asphalt hatch mix and drum mix/hot mix plants by assembling and installing the parts and components manufactured by the manufacturing units of the group. According to the notice the process of assembly of the parts and components at the site provided by the purchasers of such plants was tantamount to manufacture of such plants as a distinct product with a new name, quality, usage and character emerged out of the said process. Resultantly. the end product, namely, asphalt drum/hot mix plants became exigible to Central excise duty, which duty Solidmec had successfully avoided. The notice also proposed to levy penalties upon all the five concerns under appropriate provisions of the Central Excise Act.”
The Hon. Court has very elaborately dealt with the issue and it would be useful to go through the observations –
“22. Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 does not spell out an exhaustive definition of the expression “immovab

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ovable property” things attached to the earth or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth. The term “attached to the earth”. has not been defined in the General Clauses Act. 1897. Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act. however, gives the following meaning to the expression attached to the earth
“(a) rooted in the earth, as m the vase of trees and shrubs.
(b) imbedded in the earth, as in the case of walls and buildings;
(c) attached to what is so imbedded for the permanent beneficial enjoyment of that to which it is attached.”
25. It is evident from the above that the expression “attached to the earth” has three distinct dimensions, viz. (a) rooted in the earth as in the case of trees and shrubs (b) imbedded in the earth as in the case of walls or buildings or (c) attached lo what is imbedded for the permanent beneficial enjoyment of that to which it is attached. Attachment of the plant in question with the help of nuts and bolts to a foundation not more than 1=

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r permanent beneficial enjoyment of that to which the plant is attached.
It is nobody's case that the attachment of the plant to the foundation is meant for permanent beneficial enjoyment of either the foundation or the land in which the same is imbedded.
26. In English law the general rule is that what is annexed to the freehold becomes part of the realty under the maxim quidcquid plantatur solo, solo cedit. This maxim, however, has no application in India. Even so, the question whether a chattel is imbedded in the earth so as to become immovable property is decided on the same principles as those which determine what constitutes an annexation to the land in English law. The English law has evolved the twin tests of degree or mode of annexation and the object of annexation
27. In Wake V. Halt (1883) 8 App Cas 195 Lord Blackburn speaking for the Court of Appeal observed:
“The degree and nature of annexation is an important element for consideration: for where a chattel is so an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ancy The mode of annexation has been similarly given considerable significance by the courts in this country in order to be treated as fixture. Attachment to the earth must be as defined in Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act for instance a hut is an immovable property, even if it is sold with the option to pull it down. A mortgage of the super structure of a house though expressed to be exclusive of the land beneath, creates an interest in immovable property, for it is permanently attached to the ground on which it is built.
30. The courts in this country have applied the test whether the annexation is with the object of permanent beneficial enjoyment of the land or building Machinery for metal-shaping and electro-plating which was attached by bolls to special concrete bases and could not be easily removed, was not treated to be a part of structure or the soil beneath it. as the attachment was not for more beneficial enjoyment of either the soil or concrete. Attachment in order

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct.
(iii) The fixing of the plants to a foundation is meant only to give stability to the plant and keep its operation vibration free.
(iv) The setting up of the plant itself is not intended to be permanent at a given place. The plant can be moved and is indeed moved after the road construction or repair project for which it is set up is completed.”
It can be seen that the Hon. Supreme Court has reiterated the same principles as were seen in the earlier decision of T.T.G. Industries Ltd. v. CCE (cited supra). The Hon. Court observed that the expression “attached to the earth” has three distinct dimensions –
(a) rooted in the earth as in the case of trees and shrubs
(b) imbedded in the earth as in the case of walls or buildings or
(c) attached to what is imbedded for the permanent beneficial enjoyment of that to which is attached
It has been categorically observed that the attachment of the plant to the foundation at which it rests does not fall in the third category attache

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ause the machine was attached to earth for a more efficient working and operation the same did not per se become immovable properly.
34. The Court observed: (Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. case 1(1998) 1 SCC 400], SCC p 402, para 5)
“5. Apart front this finding of fact made by the Tribunal, the point advanced on behalf of the appellant, that whatever is embedded in earth must be treated as immovable property is basically not sound. For example, a factory owner or a householder may purchase a water pump and fix on cement base for operational efficiency and also fur sec win Thai will not make the water pump an item of immovable property. Some of the components of the water pump may even be assembled on site. That too will not make any difference to the principle. The lest is whether the paper-making machine can be sold m the market The Tribunal has found as a fact that it can be sold, in view of that finding, we are unable to uphold the contention of the appellant that the machine must be tre

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods that could be brought to market for being bought and sold.
39. We do not see any comparison between the erection and installation of a tube mill which involved a comprehensive process of installing slitting line, tube rolling plant, welding plant, testing equipment and galvanising, etc. referred to in the decision of this Court in Quality Steel Tubes case [(1995) 2 SCC 372: (1995) 75 ELT 17] with the setting up of a hot mix plant as in this case. As observed by this Court in Triveni Engg. A Industries Ltd. case [(2000) 7 SCC 29 (2000) 120 ELT 273]. the facts and circumstances of each case shall have to be examined for determining not only the factum of fastening/attachment to the earth but also the intention behind the same.
40. In Mittal Engg. Works (P) Ltd. case [(1997) 1 SCC 203 : (1996) 88 ELT 622] this Court was examining whether the mono vertical crystallisers erected and attached by a foundation to the earth at the site of the sugar factory could be treated as goods with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) 75 ELT 17]. the erection and installation of mono vertical crystallisers was held not dutiable under the Excise Act. This Court observed that: [Mittal Engg. Works (P) Ltd. Case [1997) 1 SCC 203: (1996) 88 ELT 622]. SCC p. 208. para 10]
“10. … The Tribunal ought to have remembered… that mono vertical crystallisers had, apart from assembly, to be erected and attached by foundations to the earth and, therefore, were not, in any event, marketable as they were.”
This decision also, in our opinion, does not lend any support to the case of the assessee in these appeals as we are not dealing with the case of a machine like mono vertical crystallisers which is permanently embedded in the structure of a sugar factory as was the position in Mittal Engg. Works (P) Ltd. case [(1997) 1 SCC 203 : (1996) 88 ELT 622].
The plants with which we are dealing are entirely over ground and are not assimilated in any structure. They are simply fixed to the foundation with the help of nuts and bolts i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and parcel of the structures in which they were fitted were no longer movable goods. It was in those peculiar circumstances that the installation and erection of machines at the sites were held to be by this Court to be immovable property that ceased to remain movable or marketable as they were at the time of their purchase. Once such a machine is fixed, embedded or assimilated in a permanent structure, the movable character of the machine becomes extinct. The same cannot thereafter be treated as movable so as to be dutiable under the Excise Act Hut cases in which there is no assimilation of the machine with the structure permanently, would stand on a different footing.
44. In the instant case all that has been said by the assessee is that the machine is fixed by nuts and bolts to a foundation not because (he intention was to permanently attach it to the earth but because a foundation was necessary to provide a wobble free operation to the machine. An attachment of this kind without t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Hetero Labs. Limited Versus CCT, Hyderabad GST

Hetero Labs. Limited Versus CCT, Hyderabad GST
Service Tax
2018 (7) TMI 1531 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 4-6-2018
Appeal No. ST/31175-31177/2016 – A/30677-30679/2018
Service Tax
Mr. M.V. RAVINDRAN, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) And Mr. P.V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri Y. Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri Arun Kumar, Dy. Commissioner/AR for the Respondent.
[Order per: P. VENKATA SUBBA RAO]
1. These appeals are filed by the appellant against the Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Hyderabad.
2. The appellants are manufacturers of pharmaceutical drugs with manufacturing units located across India and also outside India. They have branches and associate companies in countries such as Mexico, Russia, Dubai and Vietnam. These Branches and the Associate companies are located in their own premises and maintain their infrastructure with manpower and are registered as permanent establishments in the juris

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eable to service tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism and the appellant had not discharged the service tax on these services for which he had paid. As they have not disclosed these amounts in their Service Tax Returns, extended period of demand was invoked and interest under section 75 and penalties under sections 76 & 77 were also proposed to be imposed on the appellant. After following due process of law, Ld. Commissioner confirmed the demand and imposed penalties and interest upon them. The current appeals are against these orders of Ld. Commissioner. Earlier, vide Miscellaneous Order No. M/30081-30084/2018, dated 25.04.2018, the appellant's request for an early hearing was allowed as the amount of service tax liability confirmed is substantial. Accordingly, the matter was listed for hearing today.
3. Heard both sides and perused the records.
4. The appellants have submitted a list of 91 expenses incurred by them on various items on which the service tax is proposed to be charged.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rough their branch offices. The appellant argues that these are not IPR charges and no IPR service is received in India. In fact, these are the amounts which they have paid to the Governments of those countries to register their intellectual proprietary rights in those countries. Since registration is a statutory function done by the Governments, these services are covered by the negative list of services under Section 66 D of chapter-V of the Finance Act, 1994. It is his further submission that during the relevant period, all services rendered by the government or local authority excluding some specified in that section were exempted. It is only w.e.f. 14.05.2015, the statutory definition for 'Government' has been introduced through Section 65 B(26A) restricting the scope of government to the departments of Central Government, State Governments and Union Territories. Therefore, these services rendered by the respective governments and for which they have aid, appropriate fees can not

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uch amount on these charges and no claim for relief is made out by the appellant. The appellants argument is that salaries and other office expenditure are not liable to tax and at any rate without specifying the authority of law, no demand of service tax can be made on these amounts.
(f) Sl.No. 35 to 45: These expenses pertain to Clinical Test Charges, Consultancy Charges, Consumption of innovatory samples and testing charges. The department sought to classify the clinical test charges as technical testing and analysis service and Scientific Consultancy Service and had not made any specific classification of the remaining services. Appellant argues that these services were received and consumed outside India and hence no service tax needs to be paid on them.
(g) Sl.No. 46 to 91: These are pertain to variety of charges such as Factory Audit Expense, Translation Charges, Audit Expenses, Bank Interest, Factory Maintenance, Repair and Maintenance of computers, Membership and subscriptio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

le service has been provided is not correct. In respect of the demand under the category of Business Auxiliary Service, it is alleged by the appellant that the amounts taken by the department for some orders were wrong in the first notice. In respect of one entry head under the head “audit expenses”, demand was made on an amount of Rs. 31,97,77,299/- whereas the actual amount was only Rs. 3,19,77,299/- thus inflating the amount by Rs. 28.00 crores. They further argued that the department found a difference between the ledger amounts and the ST-3 returns because the ledger amounts reflected the provision made whereas the liability to pay service tax in the case of reverse charge mechanism is on making the payment. The amounts mentioned in the Ledger would include the amounts paid, amounts for which provision was made, amounts relating to past period and amounts which are written off. Therefore, the demand of service tax simply based on the Ledger amount is incorrect.
6. The service tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y them. The department's proposal to charge these as business promotion expenses and charge them under reverse charge mechanism is not correct. The appellant relied on the following case laws:
(a) Milind Kulkarni and others vs. CCE, Pune [2016-TIOL-709-CESTATMumbai]
(b) Genym biotech vs. CCE,Nasik [2016(42)STR 918 (Tri.-Mum.]
(c) KPIT Cummins Info System Ltd. CCE Pune [2013-TIOL-1568- CESTAT-Mumbai]
(d) CCE Bangalore vs. Pragati Concrete Products Pvt. Ltd [2015(322)ELT 818 (SC)]
(e) Sunil Forging & Steel Industries vs. CCE, Belapur [20176(332)ELT 341 (Tri.-Mum.)]
(f) CCE Bangalore vs. MTR Foods Ltd [2012(282) ELT 196 (Kar.)]
(g) Trans Engineers India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Pune [2015(40)STR 490 (Tri.-Mum.)]
8. Ld. DR reiterated the arguments made in the Orders-in-Original and vehemently opposed the appeal. It is his submission that the appellant was bound to have filed the returns reflecting the actual amount of services and the service tax liability thereon and paid the service ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es.
9. We have considered the arguments on both sides and perused the records. The demand is sought to be made on the ground that there is a difference between the ledger amounts and the amounts reflected in the Service Tax returns filed by the appellant. The amounts in the Ledger reflects the amounts transferred by the appellant to their branch offices or associate companies in foreign currency. The Department viewed these as payments made for services rendered by the overseas service provider and consumed by the appellant in India. The appellant argues that the expenses included several expenses which are the office expenses including salaries incurred by their branch offices which are being supported by the appellant. It is also their argument that there were several services for which no classification was made by the department, hence it is impossible to understand and show why the service tax under reverse charge mechanism is not payable on such expenses.
10. As has been held b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

liable to charge to service tax under reverse charge mechanism. It has been held in the case of DHL Express India Pvt. Ltd. (supra) that consideration received from a recipient of service for the services rendered by the provider alone is taxable and the demand for alleged short paid tax must be based on a finding that a specific taxable service has been provided as agreed to be provided and on the consideration that was paid or payable by the recipient of the service to the provider of the service. Similarly, in the present case, where the appellant is supposed to have received the services and is liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism, it is essential that the department say what services were received by the appellant and how they were unclassifiable and how they were liable to be charged under reverse charge mechanism and compute their tax liability accordingly. This is an original work to be done with respect to each of the specific items of expenditure on which

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of Time limit for filing FORM GSTR-6

Extension of Time limit for filing FORM GSTR-6
11/2018 Dated:- 4-6-2018 Telangana SGST
GST – States
Telangana SGST
Telangana SGST
GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
TGST Notification No. 11/2018
CCT's Ref No. A(1)/115/2017,
Dt. 04-06-2018
Sub:- Extension of Time limit for filing FORM GSTR-6.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of Section 39 read with Section 168 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (23 of 2017) (hereinafter r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai Versus BNP Paribas Sundaram Global Securities Operations Pvt Ltd.

The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai Versus BNP Paribas Sundaram Global Securities Operations Pvt Ltd.
Service Tax
2018 (6) TMI 676 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 4-6-2018
C.M.A. No. 1052 of 2018
Service Tax
S. Manikumar And V. Bhavani Subbaroyan, JJ.
For the Appellant : Mrs. Aparna Nandakumar
JUDGMENT
( Judgment of this Court was delivered by S. Manikumar, J. )
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai (CESTAT) dated 31.07.2017 in Final Order No.41584 of 2017.
2. It is the case of the appellant that M/s.BNP Paribas Sundaram Global Securities Operations Private Limited, Chennai, respondent is an 100% EOU, engaged in providing Business Auxiliary Service and Business Support Service. Respondent filed refund claim with Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax, Division III, for Rs. 71,39,495/- for the service tax paid on input s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h Floor of Menon Eternity, New Door No.165, St.Mary's Road, Alwarpet, Chennai-18
1486920
The premises were not registered at the time of export but subsequently obtained Registration.
07
Services received at International Tech Park Unit No.1 to 4, 11th Floor, Taramani Chennai.
1144872
 
3. Aggrieved by the above orders, the respondent filed an appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). The first appellate authority, Commissioner (Appeals) vide combined Order-in-Appeal No.24/2016 dated 18.02.2016 set aside a portion of the order of the original authority, and allowed refund as detailed above:
S. No.
Services
Sanctioned by Commissioner (Appeals)
Sl.No. As in table at para 2 above.
01
Car Parking charges
111240
2
02
Services received at 4th and 5th Floor of Menon Eternity, New Door No.165, St.Mary;s Road, Alwarpet, Chennai – 18
1486920
6
03
Services received at International Tech Park Unit No.1 to 4, 11th Floor Taramani Chennai
1144872
7
 
4. In so far as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the premises occupied by the respondent. He also held that the service tax paid on the rental charges is eligible for CENVAT credit, then service tax paid on the car parking charges is equally eligible for CENVAT credit and set aside the disallowance of CENVAT credit and upheld the disallowance of CENVAT credit in respect of Event Management service.
6. While the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) allowing the credit in respect of Car Parking Charges was found acceptable, the decision in respect of credit availed on the inputs received in the premises which was not registered prior to export, but subsequently obtained Registration was found to be not legally correct and hence the Department filed an appeal before CESTAT.
7. Contentions of the appellant herein were not accepted by CESTAT, Madras and vide FO No.40778 dated 22/05/2017 dismissed the appeal, as hereunder:
“2. On 21.07.2017, when the matter came up for hearing, on behalf of the department Ld.AR, Shri K.P.Muralidh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Commissioner (Appeals) has not appreciated the judgment of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore Vs. Sutham Nylocots as reported in 2014(306) ELT 255 (Mad.). No doubt, the Hon'ble High Court in the said judgment had ruled that credit accrued can take effect only after the date of registration, however, the Hon'ble High Court in the subsequent judgment passed on 10.4.2017 in the case of Scioinspire Consulting Services, referred to supra, have distinguished the facts contained in Sutham Nylocots observing that the said case was dealing with the provisions of Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and that the only ground rejection of the refund therefor was that the additional building was not registered with the concerned authority. The Hon'ble High Court agreeing with the views on identical issue of law taken by the Hon'ble High Courts of Karnataka and Allahabad in mPortal India Wireless Solutions Pvt. Ltd

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and dismiss the appeal of the department.”
8. Aggrieved over the same, instant Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed on the following substantial questions of law.
1. Whether the decision of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai (CESTAT for short) in allowing refund of CENVAT credit even without registration is correct?
2. Whether CESTAT, i.e. 1st respondent is erred in not considering the safeguards, conditions and limitations as stipulated in the Appendix to the Notification No.27/2012-CE(NT), dated 18.06.2016 .
9. Supporting the prayer sought for, Ms.Aparna Nandakumar, learned counsel for the revenue submitted that:
(i) Registration is an act by which every manufacturer / assessee / service provider comes under the ambit of Central Excise Act, 1944 / Finance Act, 1994. In order to avail any substantive benefit, like, CENVAT Credit given under the statute, registration of premises from which the taxable service is rendered is a pre-requisi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ly in respect of the registered premises of the service provider from where the output services are exported.
(iv) It has been held that registration was not a pre-requisite to claim refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. However, the Larger Bench of CESTAT, New Delhi in the case of Steel Strips Vs. CCE, Ludhiana 2011 (269) ELT (Tri-Del) vide para 5.16 has categorically stated that Modvat law has codified procedure for adjustment of duty liablity against Modvat Account. That is required to be carried out in accordance with law and unadjusted amount is not expressly permitted to be refunded. In absence of express provision to grant refund, that is difficult to entertain except in the case of export. There cannot be presumption that in the absence of debarment to make refund, in other cases that is permissible. Refund results in outflow from treasury, which needs sanction of law and an order of refund for such purpose is sine qua non. Law has only recognized the event of expo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eason that Rule 4 of Export of Service Rules, 2005 permitted a service provider to export services without payment of service tax, and thus, there is liability to pay service tax on export of service, but for this rule. Hence, for export of service by a service provider, registration is a sine qua non for procedural and substantive compliance.
(vi)The judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai-III Vs. M/s.Scionispire Consulting Services (India) P Ltd., applied by CESTAT for deciding the appeal in favour of the respondent was accepted by the department due to monetary limit and not on merits, and therefore, it is humbly submitted that the ratio of the said judgment should not have been taken as a binding precedent in view of Section 35R (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1944.
(vii)The subsequent decision of CESTAT issued vide FO No.42500/2016 dated 20/12/2016 in the case of the same pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ilized input CENVAT credit taken towards rendering the input services availed and used in providing the taxable output services exported, would not arise prior to the date of registration.
10. Heard Ms.Aparna Nandakumar, learned senior counsel for the revenue and perused the materials available on record.
11. Going through the material on record, and adverting to the submissions duly supported by the grounds of challenge, we are of the view that the issue is no longer res integra and is covered by a decision of this Court in Commissioner of Services Tax-III, Chennai Vs. M/s. Scioinspire Consulting Services India Private Limited, Chennai and another, in C.M.A.No.860 of 2017, wherein the following substantial questions of law were framed:-
“1. Whether the decision of CESTAT i.e. Respondent No.1 in allowing refund of Cenvat credit even without registration is correct?
2. Whether CESTAT i.e. Respondent No.1 is correct in not considering the safe guards, conditions and limitations as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed input service credit. The only clause of the notification, which, perhaps, the Department could have relied upon, is Clause 3, which, to our minds, has no bearing on the issue arising in the instant case. For the sake of convenience, the relevant part of the said notification is extracted hereafter :
“Notification No.05/2006-Central Excise (N.T.) 14th March 2006 G.S.R. (E) In exercise of the powers conferred by rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), and in supercession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.11/2002 – Central Excise (NT), dated 1st March, 2002, published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R.No.150(E), dated 1st March 2002, the Central Government hereby directs that refund of CENVAT credit shall be allowed in respect of :
(a) input or input service used in the manufacture of final product which is cleared for export under bond or letter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

proceeds.”
7.2. A bare perusal of the clause would show that in so far as the provider of output services is concerned, for making an application for refund of CENVAT Credit, he is required to file an application in the prescribed form, i.e., Form A, which is annexed to the notification, and the said application is required to be made to the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, or, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be. In so far as the jurisdiction of the concerned Officer is concerned, the same is fixed, in consonance with the location of the registered premises of the service provider, from which, the output service are exported. Furthermore, the application is required to be accompanied with a copy of the relevant invoices and a certificate from the bank, indicating therein, the realization of export proceeds.
7.3. Apart from the aforesaid, there is no limitation. Clearly, the notification does not prohibit the grant of CENVAT credit, even, if, the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

X export turnover / Total turnover ………”
7.5. Therefore, there is no merit in the submission advanced on behalf of the Revenue that the said notification would disentitle the claim of the Assessee qua refund of CENVAT credit.”
13. On Questions of Law 1 and 3, the Hon'ble Division Bench, at paragraph Nos.8.4 to 8.7, considered thus
“8.4.What is relevant to note is that Rule 5 of the 2004 Rules does not stipulate registration of premises as a necessary prerequisite for claiming a refund.
8.5.In so far as the Assessee in this case, is concerned, it had obtained registration of its premises way back on 23.01.2009. The record shows that allegation of non-registration of premises relates to another building, which was taken on lease by the Assessee and is located in Alwarpet, Chennai. Concededly, services were exported to a overseas Company, from this building which was not registered. Similarly, Rule 4 of the 1994 Rules, inter alia, provides that in case where a person is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. HCL Infosystems Ltd. Unit – III Versus Commissioner of GST & CCE, Pondicherry

M/s. HCL Infosystems Ltd. Unit – III Versus Commissioner of GST & CCE, Pondicherry
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 247 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 4-6-2018
Appeal Nos. E/42620 & 42621/2017 – Final Order No. 41725-41726 / 2018
Central Excise
Hon'ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member ( Judicial )
Ms. S. Yogalakshmi, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri K. P. Muralidharan, AC (AR) for the Respondent.
ORDER
The issue involved in both these appeals being the same, they were heard together and are disposed of by this common order.
2. Brief facts are that the appellants are manufacturers of computer systems and were availing the facility of Cenvat Credit of duty paid on inputs, capital goods and services tax paid on input services. On verification of records, it was noticed that during the period from April 2012 to September 2012, as well as October 2012 to March 2013, the appellants had availed Cenvat Credit on outward transportation of goods up to the bu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ctual credit availed by the appellant pertains to service tax paid on 25% of the gross amount of the freight charge incurred, whereas the appellant had paid the excise duty at the rate of 10% on the assessable value of the final goods, which is inclusive of the entire freight charge incurred. Thus, the credit availed in respect of the freight incurred is very meagre when compared to the excise duty paid on the assessable value. The department had insisted to add the freight value to the assessable value for the payment of excise duty treating the place of the client as the place of removal. Whereas, thereafter, the department has not accepted the customer's place, as the place of removal in order to deny the Cenvat Credit availed on the outward freight incurred. She submitted that as the excise duty paid on the assessable value, being at a relatively high rate, the denial of Cenvat Credit availed on service tax paid on 25% of the gross amount on reverse charge mechanism is a clear case

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e of removal, read with outward transportation up to the place of removal, would lead to the meaning of the term “place of removal”, as stated in respect of transportation services availed up to such “place of removal”. She adverted to the definition of “place of removal” contained in Section 4 (3) (c) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and also referred to Master Circular No. 97/8/2007 dated 23.08.2007. Relying on the decision in the case of M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Vs. CCE 007 (6) STR 364 (Tribunal), the learned Counsel argued that the crux of the clarification given by the Board is as to the scope of the term “place of removal”. Once, the term “place of removal” is thus understood, Cenvat Credit is eligible for transportation up to the place of removal. If buyer's premises can be considered as place of removal, then credit for GTA services up to buyer's place is also eligible. Further, that since the clarification as per the decisions as well as the Master Circular has not overcome the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent. The Circular only clarifies that the buyer's place can become place of removal if the three conditions are satisfied. If these three conditions are satisfied, the place of removal would be the buyer's place up to 31.03.2008 and credit would be eligible. After 01.04.2008, credit is not eligible for clearance of final products up to the place of removal and the GTA services availed for transporting the goods from the factory or depot to the buyer's place could be covered within the expression for clearance of final products up to the place of removal, if otherwise, the buyer's place can be considered as the place of removal. That, therefore, the conclusion of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the said clarification is not relevant after 01.04.2008, as it appears to be incorrect. That the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court does not deal with these issues and, therefore, does not cover the issue under consideration. She prayed that the credit on the service tax, paid on outward transportatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds (Second Amendment) Rules, 2018.

Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds (Second Amendment) Rules, 2018.
F. No. 31013/16/2017-ST-I-DoR – G.S.R. 524(E) Dated:- 4-6-2018 Central GST (CGST)
GST
CGST
CGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 4th June, 2018
G.S.R. 524(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 53 read with section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), sections 17 and 18 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (13 of 2017) and section 21 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (14 of 2017), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds Rules, 2017, namely:-
1. (1) These ru

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

E WAY BILL

E WAY BILL
Query (Issue) Started By: – YUWRAJ KOTHARI Dated:- 2-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 7-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
My Client has a business of Cement (Reseller). Whereas Company send Cement bags via rail to a particular destination. After that Company provide Transport facility to send cement bags to client but during the transit client request transporter to send Cement bags directly to the 3 customer situated at three different places. My queries is whether we have to generate e way bill and if yes then HOW or Transporter will take care of such transaction.
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
One can transport goods through different modes of transportation – Road, Rail, Air, Shi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fted from railway siding to buyer plant by around 200 trucks(16 km distance). In that case how to update part-B of e-Way bill.
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
Where the goods are transported by railways or by air or vessel, the Part B of the e-way bill can be updated either before or after the commencement of movement. But, where the goods are transported by railways, the railways shall not deliver the goods, unless the e-way bill as required under these rules is produced to them, at the time of delivery.
One e-way bill can go through multiple modes of transportation before reaching destination. As per the mode of transportation, the EWB can be updated with new mode of transportation by using 'Update Vehicle Number'.
Let us assume t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods to Other State Branches Under GST Can Use Invoice Value as Open Market Value with Full Input Tax Credit.

Goods to Other State Branches Under GST Can Use Invoice Value as Open Market Value with Full Input Tax Credit.
Case-Laws
GST
GST – Valuation of a supply – Goods transferred to branches in ano

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RECORDS IN GST REGIME_ELECTRONIC Vs PHYSICAL

RECORDS IN GST REGIME_ELECTRONIC Vs PHYSICAL
By: – Ram Akshya
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 2-6-2018

1. Introduction
Maintenance of books of account and documentation is one of the important compliance requirement under any tax law. The tax payer or the assessee is required to record all transactions in his books of account and keep all the documents entered into for any transaction in safe custody up to a particular period of time. Different tax law specifies different period for which records, documents etc. should be preserved. Further, the correct assessment, audit, verification of compliances are based on proper maintenance of books of accounts and records keeping. Goods and Service Tax (GST) is mainly self-assessment based system where the registered person is required to assess his liability and pay it by filing applicable returns. Off course, the basis for this is underlying records for a particular transaction. The GST law has also prescribed documents

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iche.”
* As per Section 2(12) of Companies Act 2013, “book and paper' and 'book or paper' include books of account, deeds, vouchers, writings, documents, minutes and registers maintained on paper or in electronic form.”
* As per Section 2(13) of Companies Act 2013, “books of account' includes records maintained in respect of-
(i) all sums of money received and expended by a company and matters in relation to which the receipts and expenditure take place;
(ii) all sales and purchases of goods and services by the company;
(iii) the assets and liabilities of the company; and
(iv) the items of cost as may be prescribed under section 148 in the case of a company which belongs to any class of companies specified under that section.”
* As per Section 2(36) of Companies Act 2013, “document includes summons, notice, requisition, order, declaration, form and register, whether issued, sent or kept in pursuance of this Act or under any other law for the time being in force or otherwi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

form of data stored on any electronic device. In case, there is any change in the registers and other documents maintained electronically, a log of every entry edited or deleted is required to be maintained. Further, proper electronic back up of all the records is required to be maintained and preserved so that in case of destruction of such records due to any reason, it may be restored within a reasonable period of time. The person maintaining electronic records is to submit the relevant records, documents in hard copy or in electronic readable format, duly authenticated by him to the appropriate authority if demanded. Further, the details of files stored electronically, password of such files and explanation for codes used etc. is also required to be provided on demand.
4. Location of maintenance of books of accounts
The GST law requires every registered person to maintain the books of accounts at his places of business respectively. In case, there is multiple business locations

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e of business shall be kept at such place of business. Accordingly, every registered person is to keep and maintain the account of:
* Manufacture of goods
* To maintain monthly production accounts showing quantitative details of raw material or services used in the manufacture and quantitative details of goods so manufactured including waste and by-products
Inward & outward supply of goods or services
* Stock of goods
* Input tax credit availed
* Output tax payable and paid
* It should contain the details of tax payable including payable as per Section 9(3) & Section 9(4), tax collected and paid, input tax, input ta credit claimed together with a register of tax invoice, credit notes, debit notes, delivery challan issued or received during any tax period
Import or export
* Supplies attracting payment of tax on reverse charge basis
* Relevant documents including invoices, bills of supply, delivery challans, credit notes, debit notes, receipt vouchers, payment voucher

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d therein.
6. Period of preservation of accounts
Every registered person who is required to keep and maintain books of accounts or other records as per GST law shall preserve the same till the expiry of seventy two months (six years) from the due date of furnishing the annual return. The due date of filing of annual return is 31st December from the end of the relevant financial year. Thus, the books of accounts or other records must be preserved at least seventy nine months from the end of the relevant financial year.
In case, there is any appeal or revision or investigation or any other proceeding/case going on, the books of accounts and other records pertaining to such proceeding is required to be preserved for a period of one year after final disposal of such proceeding/case or till the expiry of seventy two months from 31st December of relevant financial year, whichever is later.
7. Conclusion
From the above, it is derived that the GST law has extensive accounting and record k

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund in case of Inverted Duty Structure

Refund in case of Inverted Duty Structure
Query (Issue) Started By: – Riya Jain Dated:- 2-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 2-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Sir
In Gst refund form of inverted duty structure ,where output tax is 12% and 18% and input tax 18% and 28% , it asks for turnover of inverted supply of goods, in that will only be 12 percent will be taken or 12% and 18‰ both turnover.Also if only 12% turnover is to be taken, then it becomes contradictory

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST revenue collection for May 2018

GST revenue collection for May 2018
GST
Dated:- 1-6-2018

GST revenue collection for May 2018
Rs 94,016 Crore of total gross GST revenue collected in May2018
Gross revenue collection in may is much higher than the monthly average of GST collection in the last financial year
The total gross GST revenue collected in the month of May2018 is Rs. 94,016 crore of which CGST is ₹ 15,866 crore, SGST is ₹ 21,691 crore, IGST is ₹ 49,120 crore (including ₹ 24,447 crore collected on imports) and Cess is ₹ 7,339 crore (including ₹ 854 crore collected on imports).The total number of GSTR 3B Returns filed for the month of April up to 31st May, 2018 is 62.47 lakh.
The total revenue earned by Central Gove

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Printing Customer Content on Photographic Paper Classified as Service Under SAC 9989, 12% GST Applies.

Printing Customer Content on Photographic Paper Classified as Service Under SAC 9989, 12% GST Applies.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of supply – Activity of Printing content supplied by the cu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Late payment of GST amount

Late payment of GST amount
Query (Issue) Started By: – Yugank Goel Dated:- 1-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 8-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear All,
Suppose we have not depsited tax on time then what is the interest rate that we will be liable to pay.
Is it 18% or 24%??
If 18%, then when we got liable for 24%.
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
Interest on Late GST Payment
An interest of 18 percent is levied on the late payment of taxes under the GST regime.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Gst paid but return not submitted

Gst paid but return not submitted
Query (Issue) Started By: – Yugank Goel Dated:- 1-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 7-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Dear All,
There is a issue which I had discussed with many consultants but I found that this is debatable as every consultant comes with their own view which is different from others. Please help me to solve this.
We have not submitted the GSTR 3B returns for past 3-4 months but we have deposited the tax amount timely. We just want to know that when we will file the return, shall we have to pay interest also on amount which we have already paid in advance as we have not setoff our GST liability or there will be only penalty for late filing.
Reply By YAGAY and SUN

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reply By Yugank Goel:
The Reply:
Regarding late fee this is true but is there any provision that tax paid in advance without being setoff the liability in GSTR3B still be liable for interest for the output liability?????
Reply By Praveen Nair:
The Reply:
Dear Yugank
If there are no change in the Output liability and the amount paid advance (credit / cash) is unutilized as on the date of filing the GSTR3B return, which you desire to file with the late payment fees, it is a matter of representation to the right authority. No interest is leviable.
Regards
Pravin Nair
Reply By Mahadev R:
The Reply:
In GST law, tax amounts are deemed to be paid only when they are adjusted with the liability in liability register which can happen only on

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems
15/2018 Dated:- 1-6-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CITY CUSTOMS COMMISSIONERATE, P.B. NO. 5400, C.R. BUILDING QUEEN'S ROAD, BENGALURU 001560.
C.NO.VIII/09/ 09/2018 City Cus. Tech
Dated: 01.06.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 15/2018
Subject: Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Sys

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. BC Examinations and English Services India Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: M/s. BC Examinations and English Services India Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1495 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS HARYANA – 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. 107 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS HARYANA – AAR
Dated:- 1-6-2018
AAR No. HAR/HAAR/R/2017-18/11
GST
SANGEETA KARMAKAR AND VIJAY KUMAR SINGH, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Sh. Amar Pratap Singh, Advocate and Sh. Ankit Awal, C.A.
Present for the department: –
Factual Background
1. As per the statement of facts submitted by the Applicant, it is a subsidiary of the British Council which is the U.K.'s International Organisation for cultural relations and educational opportunities. International English Language Testing System (hereinafter referred as 'IELTS') is a highly regarded English Language proficiency test developed, managed and owned by the British Council, U.K. (hereinafter referred to as 'BCUK').
2. BCUK furthers its charitable, educational and cultural relations by offering

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ervices would cover the following:
(i) To source and manage the running of suitable test centre venues in India for the examination:
(ii) To receive registration information from BCUK and its registration agents for IELTS;
(iii) To maintain supplies of Test Materials for administration and comply with security requirement set by BCUK and relevant external exam boards in relation to logging in and out. To distribute test materials to candidates on the test day and collect them after test administration for processing; 
(iv) To manage test administration and logistics for test days, including scheduling of the Applicant's staff and liaison with the test centres;
(v) To provide back office support in relation to financial controls and accounting processes in respect of examinations held at test centres managed by the Applicant;
(vi) To print IELTS result in paper form from BCUK's global system and distribute certificates on BCUK's behalf to successful candidates i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r alt the activities involved in the exam support services constitute a mixed supply or a composite supply?
2. What will be rate of GST applicable on these exam support services?
3. What is the place of supply of these exam support services rendered by the Applicant BCKU?
Comment of the Officer under section 98 (1) of the CGST, HGST Act 2017
The Assistant Commissioner, Division East-II, Central GST, Gurugrum vide his comments dated 17.05.2018 has stated as follows:
1. Regarding question no. 1
“The impugned services proposed to be provided by the Applicant constitute a composite supply of conduction of examination and other back end support Services.”
2. Regarding question no. 2
“The principal supply is of the conducting exams which is taxable @ 18%.”
3. Regarding question no. 3
“The place of supply the impugned service shall be the location of the recipient of the service.”
Record of Personal Hearing
The applicant was afforded a personal bearing for 24.05.2018 and on 31.05.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rts. As per schedule-I appended to the copy of agreement submitted on record part-A is for responsibilities of service recipient, part-B specifies 8 types of exam support services and pan-C specifies to services pertaining to student facilitation services.
The Ld. Counsel for the applicant had argued that the proposed services as per part-B in schedule -I appended to the copy of agreement are exam support services and constitute a composite supply of conduction of examination and the services mentioned in part-C of said agreement are other back end support services which are so bundled together that such back end support services cannot be said to have an independent existence. These are only ancillary to conduction of examination. The bundle of these  services is classifiable as other educational support services under service code 999299 group code 99929 and beading 9992 as per scheme of classification of services appended to notification no. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to several case laws and particularly to section 2 (6) of the IGST Act.
After hearing these present in detail the decision on admissibility of the application was pronounced and as regard decision on question 1 & 2, on which the application was admitted, was reserved which is being released today.
Discussion and finding of authority
Since the ruling is restricted only to the question of nature of supply and rate of tax applicable, it is relevant to understand the provisions of law on these issues.
1. Section 2(30) of the CGST/HGST Act 2017 defines a “composite supply” to mean a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the course of business, one of which is a principal supply.
2. Further Section 2(90) Of CGST/HGST Act 2017 defines a “principal supply” to mean the supply of goods or services which const

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nistration and comply with security requirement set by BCUK and relevant external exam boards in relation to logging in and out. To distribute test materials to candidates on the test day and collect them after test administration for processing;
(iv) To manage test administration and logistics for test days, including scheduling of the Applicant's staff and liaison with the test centres;
 (v) To provide back office support in relation to financial controls and accounting processes in respect of examinations held at test centre; managed by the Applicant;
(vi) To print IELTS result in paper from from the BCUK's global system and distribute certificates on BCUK' s behalf to successful candidates in India;
(vii) To recruit, train and monitor invigilators, examiners and test paper markers for the IELTS tests, in accordance with the standards set by BCUK and their own administrative and management staff;
(viii) To periodically inspect the quality of test centres and pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Gitwako Farms (India) Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: M/s. Gitwako Farms (India) Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1494 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS HARYANA – 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. 127 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS HARYANA – AAR
Dated:- 1-6-2018
HAR/HAAR/R/2017-18/10
GST
Sangeeta Karmakar Member CGST and Vijay Kumar Singh Member SGST
ADVANCE RULING NO.HAR/HAAR/R/2017-18/10
(In Application No.: 10, dated 06.03.2018)
Present for the Applicant: Sh. Gourav Gupta C.A. and Sh. Neeraj
Present for the department: Sh. Rakesh Dahiya, ETO, Mewat.
Factual Background
M/s. Gitwako Farms (India) Pvt. Ltd supplies to Army and Para Military Forces sheep/goat meat in carcasses of different weight and size in frozen State. Each frozen carcass is put in LDPE bag (primary packing) which is sealed with a tie and no weight is mentioned on such LDPE bags. Thereafter, one or two of such LDPE bags are put in dust and moisture proof food grade HDPE bags (secondary packing). On such HDPE bags, contents including produc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Hearing
The applicant was afforded a personal hearing for 24.05.2018. The issue raised by the applicant for advance ruling, whether their product can be said to be packed in a unit container to fall under the scope of notification no. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and 1/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 or notification no. 2/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. is covered under the scope of section 97 of CGST/HGST Act 2017 and therefore, the application was admitted.
As regard the classification of their product, the departmental representative had stated that the applicant firm is packing the animal carcasses in bags for supplying to their customers, i.e. Army, in unit containers and therefore it attracts GST @ 12%.
The applicant had strongly argued that the packing done by them cannot be said to be unit containers as it is defined in the explanation to mean a package designed to hold a pre-determined quantity or number which is indicated on such package. The applican

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ut up in a 'unit container, it would be exigible to tax @12%.
Correspondingly, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, the Central Government vide notification no. 2/2017-lntegrated Tax (rate) New Delhi dated 28.06.2017 has exempted, Inter-State supplies of goods, from the whole of the Integrated Tax leviable thereon. Relevant extract is reproduced below:
Schedule-
Sr. No.
Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff item
Description of Goods
10.
0204
Meat of sheep or goats, [other than frozen and put up in unit containers]
W.e.f. from 15th November 2017 onwards.
Schedule I of the Notification no. 43/2017-Integrated Tax (rate) dated 14th November, 2017 deals with the products which are subject to 5% GST and entry No. 1 which pertain to sheep meat and poultry meat are provided below:-
Schedule-I
Sr.No.
Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff item
Description of Goods
1.
0204, 0207
All goods (other than

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 the Central Government via notification no. 44/2017 Integrated Tax (rate) New Delhi dated 14.11.2017 has exempted, Inter-State supplies of goods, from the whole of the integrated tax leviable thereon. Relevant extract is reproduced below:
Schedule-
Sr.No.
Chapter/Heading/Sub- heading/Tariff item
Description of Goods
8
0204
0207
All goods, fresh or chilled
7.
0204
0207
All goods (other than fresh or chilled) other than those put up in unit container and,-
(a) bearing a registered brand name; or
(b) bearing a brand name on which actionable claim or enforceable right in court of law is available [other than those where any actionable claim or enforceable right in respect of such brand name has been foregone voluntarily], subject to conditions as in the annexure I]”,
A conjoint reading of the extracts of the above mentioned notifications reveal that on products of Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff item 0204 and 0207 GST is ch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

packing) which is sealed with a tie and no weight is mentioned on such LDPE bags. Thereafter, generally two of such LDPE bags are put in HDPE bags (secondary packing) and the weight of both the packed carcasses is mentioned on the secondary packing. Thus, the packing of the frozen carcasses done by them is only a medium of delivery and since these are not in pre-determined units, these packing cannot be termed as 'Unit Containers'.
To substantiate their view regarding unit container the applicant had cited several case laws. Reliance is placed on the case of CCE Vs Shalimar Super Foods [2007 (210) ELT 695 (Tri.-Mumbai] and Surya Agro Oils Ltd. vs CCE, Indore, 2000 (116) ELT 514.
In of CCE Vs Shalimar Super Foods [2007 (210) ELT 695 (Tri.-Mumbai] the Hon'ble bench had considered the question of 'Unit Container' and observed in para 3:
“3. . . .However, unit container, as per the definitions contained in several dictionaries, is a container containing pre-determine

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

one by the applicant cannot be regarded as 'Unit Container' since it is not standardised to hold a uniform predetermined quantity. Also in the explanation appended to the Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 a unit container means a package, whether large or small (for example tin, can, jar, box, bottle, bag, carton, drum, barrel or canister) designed to hold a pre-determined quantity or number, which is indicated on such package. The explanation itself suggests that the make of the container should be such which can hold a predetermined quantity or number. It should be such that when packed it holds the predetermined quantity or the number for which it is designed. As shown to us the packaging by the applicant can weigh 10 Kgs or 11 Kgs or for that matter 10.5 or 10.25 Kgs depending upon the weight of two frozen carcasses, packed in secondary packaging. Neither the packaging is uniform or standardised nor the packages are designed to hold a predet

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =