IN RE : YAMUNA EXPRESSWAY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

IN RE : YAMUNA EXPRESSWAY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
GST
2018 (10) TMI 341 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – UTTAR PRADESH – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 50 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – UTTAR PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 6-6-2018
Order No. 9
GST
Shri Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Member (State Tax) and Dinesh Kumar, Member (Central Tax)
ORDER
M/s. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority, 1st Floor, Commercial Complex, P-2, Omega 1, Greater Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar, Utter Pradesh – 201308 (hereinafter called the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN : 09AAALT0341DIZC.
2.  The applicant, in their application dated 9-3-2018, raised the following question to be determined by the auth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Notification No. 12/2017, dated 28-6-2017.
4.  The applicant was granted a personal hearing on 2-5-2018. Shri Mukul Mittal, Chartered Accountant appeared on behalf of the applicant. The authorized representative of the applicant was heard in the matter and the contentions raised were examined.
5.  As per Sl. No. 41 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 as amended by Notification No. 32/2017-CentraI Tax (Rate), dated 13-10-2017 –
“Upfront amount (called as premium, salami, cost, price, development charges or by any other name) payable in respect of service by way of granting of long-term lease of thirty years, or more) of industrial plots or plots for development of infrastructure for financial busi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Sasan Power Ltd.

In Re : Sasan Power Ltd.
GST
2018 (9) TMI 433 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MADHYA PRADESH – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 645 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MADHYA PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 6-6-2018
Advance Ruling No. 1 of 2018
GST
Shri Rajeev Agrawal, Joint Commissioner, And Commissioner CGST And Central Excies And Shri Manoj Kumar Choubey, Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Commircial Tax Division
For The Applicant : Gopal Mundra, Ravi Ghiyani and Mrs. Laxmi Vyas
ORDER
1. Brief facts of the case
1.1 M/s. Sasan Power Ltd., Sasan (hereinafter referred to as “the Applicant”), are engaged in the business of generation and sale of electricity, having Registration No. 23AAKCS072M1ZB. The applicants have been allocated captive coal mines in the State of M.P. with a condition that the coal extracted would be exclusively used in the power generation plant of the applicant. The applicant have been granted one single registration under CGST Act, 2017 for the ca

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

zed as on 30.6.2017.
1.3 Further, the applicant had been using such coal in their power plant for generation of Electricity, which was exempted from Central Excise duty. During the process of manufacture/generation of electricity in the thermal power plant, Fly ash emerges as an inevitable by-product/waste which is further sold by the applicant against monetary consideration.
1.4 Consequent upon introduction and roll out of GST with effect from 1.7.2017, the 'supply' has become the taxable event and shifting of coal from coal mines of the applicant to their power plant for self use or captive consumption shall be out of ambit of 'supply'. In such circumstances, the applicant has sought Advance Ruling on following two questions :
(i) Whether the applicant is entitled to carry forward the accumulated cenvat credit as reflected in its Excise returns for the month of June- 2017 to GST regime in terms of provisions under the CGST Act, 2017, more particularly Section 140 o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

same has been under scrutiny of the jurisdictional officers. It was also pointed out in the letter that the applicant company has also been audited by cost audit and certain objections have been raised through memos issued to applicant. To sum up in a nutshell, the question raised before the AAR, have already been under consideration and scrutiny of the department.
4. Discussions and findings :
4.1 We have carefully considered the facts put up before the Authority by way of written submission and also those placed during the course of personal hearing. We find that the short point involved in the matter before us is regarding admissibility of Cenvat credit lying unutilized as balance as per the last ER-1 filed by the applicant for the month of June, 2017, in light of the provisions of Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017 which specifically deals with the subject of Transitional Credit.
4.2 We have taken a note of the letter F.No. GST/PartyIssue/HQR JBP/2017-18 dated 10.5.2018 of the Jo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iability to pay tax on any goods or services or both;
(f) whether applicant is required to be registered;
(g) whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of that term.
4.5 A plain reading of Section 97(2) clearly implies that the any question relating to CENVAT credit, which falls under transitional provision, shall be out of purview of Advance Ruling. Admissibility of input tax credit, as given in Section 97(2), relates to 'input tax credit' as defined in Section 2(63) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 2(62) ibid and not the CENVAT carried forward in TRAN-1, which categorically pertains to pre-GST regime. Thus, we find that the question placed before us does not fall within the four corners of issues defined for seeking Advance Ruling under Section 97(2) ibid. Hence the application does not hold ground to be admitted on this count.
4.6

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Esab India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Chennai Outer)

M/s. Esab India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Chennai Outer)
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 1495 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 6-6-2018
Appeal No. E/42624-42631/2017 – Final Order No. 41735-41742/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Shri P. Ravindran, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Respondent.
ORDER
The issue involved in all these appeals being the same, they were heard together and disposed of by this common order.
2. The appellants are engaged in manufacture of Welding Electrodes and Welding Fluxes and are availing the facility of Cenvat Credit of duty paid on inputs, capital goods and service tax paid on input ser

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

yees of the appellant-factory. That these services are essentially necessary for the manufacturing activity of the appellant-factory. It is also pointed out by him that the period is prior to 01.04.2011, when the definition of “input services” had a wide ambit, as it included the words 'activities relating to business'. The learned Counsel also relied upon the judgement of the jurisdictional High Court judgement of the Madras High Court in the case of Comstar Automotive Technologies Pvt. Ltd., [2017 (6) TMI 910] and M/s. Visteon Automotive Systems India Ltd.[ 2016 (12) TMI 1383].
4. The learned AR, R. Subramaniam, supported the findings in the impugned order.
5. Heard both sides.
6. The short issue for consideration is whether the servi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Tide Water Oil Company (India) Limited) Versus Goods & Services Tax Council

M/s. Tide Water Oil Company (India) Limited) Versus Goods & Services Tax Council
GST
2018 (8) TMI 390 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – TMI
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-6-2018
WRIT PETITION No. 23558/2018 (T-RES)
GST
MR. B. VEERAPPA J.
Petitioner (BY Smt. Rukmini Nair, Advocate)
Respondents (By Sri K M Shivayogiswamy, Advocate for R1, Sri Vikram Huigol, HCGP for R2 & R3)
ORDER
After arguing the matter for sometime, Smt. Rukmini Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Gulf Oil Lubricants India Limited Versus Goods & Services Tax Council and Others

M/s. Gulf Oil Lubricants India Limited Versus Goods & Services Tax Council and Others
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1688 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – TMI
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-6-2018
WRIT PETITION No.23557/2018 (T–RES)
GST
MR. B. VEERAPPA J.
Petitioner (BY Smt.Rukmini Nair, Advocate)  
Respondents: (By Sri K M Shivayogiswamy, Advocate for R1, Sri Vikram Huigol, HCGP for R2 & R3)  
ORDER
After arguing the matter for sometime, Smt. Rukmini Nair, learned counsel f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Summit Online Trade Solutions Pvt. Ltd., M/s Future Gaming & Hotel Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., Pan India Network Ltd. & Anr., Versus Union of India & Ors.

M/s. Summit Online Trade Solutions Pvt. Ltd., M/s Future Gaming & Hotel Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., Pan India Network Ltd. & Anr., Versus Union of India & Ors.
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1635 – SIKKIM HIGH COURT – [2018] 59 G S.T.R. 56 (Sik), 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 18 (Sikkim)
SIKKIM HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-6-2018
IA No. 05/2018 in WP (C) No. 38/2017, IA No. 07/2018 in WP (C) No. 36/2017, IA No. 01/2018 in WP (C) No. 59/2017,
GST
MR. BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN J.
For Petitioner (s) : Mr. A.R. Madhav Rao, Ms. Laxmi Chakraborty and Ms. Manju Rai, Advocates., Mr. Karma Sonam Lhendup, Advocate
For Respondent (s) For R-1 & R-2 : Mr. B.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For R-3 & R-4 : Mr. J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Karma Thinlay, Sr. Govt. Advocate, Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Govt. Advocate, Mr. S.K. Chettri, Ms. Pollin Rai, Assistant Government Advocates. For R-3 : Ms. Prarthana Ghataney, Advocate
For R-5 & R-6 : None. For R-7 : Mr. Salvador Santosh Rebello and Mr. Ugang Lepch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ices Tax Act both Central as well as State. The Applicant submits that the notification or order or action of one State cannot be subjected to judicial scrutiny within the jurisdiction of a High Court beyond the territorial jurisdiction of that State more so when no cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of that High Court. It is the Applicant's case that as far as challenge to the notification issued by the State of Goa is concerned and charging of the Tax thereunder, the cause of action, if any, has arisen in Goa and thus, the appropriate Court where the notification and the consequential actions if at all can be challenged is the High Court of Bombay at Goa. Consequently, the Applicant submits that this Court would not entertain such a challenge to the notification of the Government of Goa is concerned.
4. The Applicant further states that an identical Writ Petition No. 759/2017 has already been filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa by one Serenity Trades Private

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

se territories directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibitions, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part III and for any other purpose
(2) The power conferred by clause (1) to issue directions, orders or writs to any Government, authority or person may also be exercised by any High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to the territories within which the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises for the exercise of such power, notwithstanding that the seat of such Government or authority or the residence of such person is not within those territories
(3) Where any party against whom an interim order, whether by way of injunction or stay or in any other manner, is made on, or in any proceedings relating to, a petition under clause (1), without
(a) furnishing to such party copies of such petition and all documents in support of the plea for such interim order; and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ndia the power conferred by clause (1) to issue directions, orders or Writs to any Government Authority or person may also be exercised by this Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to the territories within which the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises for the exercise of such powers, nothwithstanding that the seat of such Government or Authority or the residence of such person is not within those territories.
8. Article 246 A of Constitution of India provides:-
“(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in articles 246 and
254, Parliament, and, subject to clause (2), the Legislature of every State, have power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax imposed by the Union or by such State.
(2) Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax where the supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.
Explanation.-
The provisions of this article, shall, in respect of goods and s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ikkim” within the State of Sikkim as well as its lottery tickets in the State of Goa.
12. The Petitioner in WP(C) No.59/2017 is the marketing Agent/distributor of State organized online lotteries organized, promoted and conducted by the State of Sikkim and is marketing the State organized online lotteries of the State of Sikkim in the State of Goa.
13. It is the case of the Petitioner in the aforesaid Writ Petitions that the State of Goa having issued the impugned notification under the GGST Act, 2017 to impose tax on the lotteries organized, run and conducted by the State of Sikkim is unconstitutional and illegal.
14. In WP(C) No.36/2017 the State of Goa is Respondent No.9. In the said Writ Petition the following prayers are sought :-
“(a) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or certiorari or any other writ order or direction to hold and declare that the provisions of Serial No.6 of Schedule III read with Section 7(2) of the Central Goods and Service Act, 2017 and also serial No

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rit in the nature of mandamus or certiorari or any other writ order or direction quashing and setting aside Serial No.228 in Schedule-IV of the impugned Central Notification, impugned IGST Notification and the impugned State Notifications providing for taxation of “Lottery authorized by State Governments” and to further quash, set aside and/or read down S.No.242 in Schedule-II of the impugned Central Notification, impugned IGST Notification and the impugned State Notifications of Respondent Nos.2 to 12 providing for taxation of “Lottery run by State Governments”;
(d) in the further alternative, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ order or direction to hold and declare that even if State lotteries are subject to tax, the prize money in a lottery ticket or under the lottery scheme of the State Government cannot be taxed at all and the tax i.e. Central tax and the State tax imposed on State Organized lotteries under the CGST Act, 2017 IGST Act, 2017 and the SGST Act,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notification;
(f) in the further alternative, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ order or direction to hold and declare that the Respondents shall give credit of Central tax, integrated tax and/or the State tax to the Petitioners in respect of the “unsold lottery tickets” under Section 34 of the CGST Act of 2017, IGST and Section 34 of the SGST Acts, 2017;
(g) in the further alternative, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ order or direction to quash and set aside the “impugned GST Notification- Reverse Charge”, impugned IGST Notification – Reverse Charge, and the impugned State Notification – Reverse Charge providing that in case of Lottery supply the Lottery Distributor or selling agent shall be liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis;
(h) pass any other directions/s, relief/s, order/s that may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of this case.
(i) all the costs of Writ Petition”
15. In WP(C) No.38/2017 the State of Goa is a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2017 and the State rate Notifications of the States of Sikkim, Goa, Punjab and Maharashtra to the extent it levies tax on the face value of the lottery ticket without abating the prize money component of the lottery ticket when the said amount never forms part of the income of the Petitioner the lottery trade.
(iv) Pass such other orders that his Hon'ble Court may consider proper in the above case.”
16. In WP(C) No.59/2017 the State of Goa has been arrayed as Respondent No.5 and the Petitioner has sought for the following prayers:-
“(a) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or certiorari or any other writ order or direction to hold and declare that “lottery” are not “actionable claims” for the purpose of Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act and assumption and treatment of lotteries as “actionable claims” for the purpose of subjecting lotteries to tax under the GST Act, 2017, IGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 is illegal and unconstitutional and beyond the scope and powers of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

zed Lotteries” as “Lotteries run by State Governments” and/or “Lotteries authorized by State Governments” and recommend and/or levy two different and varying rates on the State Lotteries based on such non-existent classification i.e. 12% and 28% respectively;
(d) in the further alternative, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or certiorari or any other writ order or direction quashing and setting aside S.No.228 in Schedule-IV of the impugned Central Notification, impugned IGST Notification and the impugned State Notifications providing for taxation of “Lottery authorized by State Governments” and to further quash, set aside and/or read down S.No.242 in Schedule-II of the impugned Central Notification, impugned IGST Notification and the impugned State Notifications of Respondent Nos.2 to 12 providing for taxation of “Lottery run by State Governments”; (e) in the further alternative, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ order or direction to hold and declare that

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tickets supplied on the basis of 100/112 in respect of S.No.242 of Schedule II and 100/128 in respect of S.No.228 of Schedule IV of the face value of the lottery ticket and to hold the said fixation under the impugned Central Notification, impugned IGST Notification and impugned State Notification;
(g) in the further alternative, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ order or direction to quash and set aside the “impugned GST Notification – Reverse Charge”, impugned IGST Notification -Reverse Charge, and the Impugned State Notification – Reverse Charge providing that in case of Lottery supply the Lottery Distributor or selling agent shall be liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis;
(h) pass any other direction/s, relief/s, order/s that may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of this case.
(i) all the costs of Writ Petition.”
17. It is the case of the Petitioners in the Writ Petitions that the State of Goa is also engaged in the business of State organ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ioners that if the distinction between lotteries run by the State Government and the lotteries authorized by the State Government is made as has been done by the impugned notifications the same would be ex-facie illegal and would be mis-used by the States in order to monopolize the business of lottery by selling its lottery within its own State by classifying and certifying its own lotteries as lotteries run by State Governments whereas on one or several ground stating that the lotteries of the other State as “lotteries authorized by the State Governments” which would wipe out the competition apart from the fact that it would be in violation of the Section 5 of the Lotteries Regulation Act, 1998.
19. Thus it is seen that the Petitioners are aggrieved by not only impugned notification issued by State of Goa under the GGST Act, 2017 but also by the act of the Centre of issuing the impugned notifications under the CGST Act, 2017 as well as the IGST Act, 2017 which seeks to levy Goods and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

notices had been issued by this Court in WP(C) No.36/2017 and WP(C) No.38/2017 on 17.07.2017.
23. The aforesaid I.A (s) were all filed on 27.02.2018.
24. A part of the cause of action for the present Writ Petition having arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court coupled with the fact that the said Writ Petitions WP(C) No. 36/2017 and WP(C) No.38/2017 having been filed prior in time before this Court to the Writ Petition filed by Serenity Trades Private Limited in WP(C) No.759/2017 in the High Court of Bombay at Goa and WP(C) No.59/2017 is being heard together with the said two Writ Petitions this Court is of the view that the aforesaid applications filed in the aforesaid Writ Petitions for deletion of State of Goa from the array of Respondents in the said Writ Petitions are liable to be dismissed.
25. All the aforesaid I.A (s) stands dismissed. Ordered accordingly.
26. The State of Goa may file the counter affidavit, if they desire to do so.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: VNR Seeds (P.) Ltd.,

In Re: VNR Seeds (P.) Ltd.,
GST
2018 (7) TMI 881 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, CHHATTISGARH – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 559 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, CHHATTISGARH – AAR
Dated:- 6-6-2018
NO. STC/AAR/01/2018
GST
S.K. BUXY AND RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, MEMBER
Ruling
1. The Applicant M/s VNR Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Raipur, GSTIN 22AACCV0174D1ZW has filed the application U/s 97 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 requesting advance ruling to keep Input Tax Credit (ITC) of the packaging material till they are into their stock and regarding ITC while transferring goods between their 'own branches. This ruling has been sought by the applicant in the light of section 17 of CGGST Act, 2017 stipulating therein non accumulation of ITC in case of units dealing in non-tax/exempted goods. The aforesaid Advance ruling has also been requested by the applicant as for each such transfer they have to pay GST merely for internal transfer of goods from one b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s India and are required to pay GST merely for these inter-branch transfers. It was thus their contention that they are liable for multiple tax which is against the core principles of GST.
4. Personal Hearing: -In keeping with the established principles of natural justice, personal hearing in the matter was extended to the applicant. Shri Manish Karkun, Assistant General Manager (Accounts) of the applicant, M/s VNR Seeds Pvt. Ltd., Raipur, appeared before us for hearing on 24.5.2018 and reiterated their contention. He also furnished a written submission dated 24/5/2018, which has been taken on record.
5. The legal position, Analysis and Discussion:-
The provisions for implementing the CGST Act and CGGST Act, 2017 are similar.
Now we sequentially discuss the provisions that are applicable in the present case -The Applicant is involved in –
a. The supply of seeds (exempted item) in packaged form using packaging material (taxable under GST) and also in
b. Supply of such packaging ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pal supply;
ii U/s. 8 of CGGST Act, 2017:- Tax liability on composite and mixed supplies. The Tax Liability on a composite or a mixed supply shall be determined in the following manner, namely:-
(a) a composite supply comprising two or more supplies, one of which is a principal supply, shall be treated as a supply of such principal supply.
(b) a mixed supply………..
Iii U/s. 16(1) of CGGST Act, 2017:- Every registered person shall, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed and in the manner specified in Section 49, be entitled to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both to him which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business and the said amount shall be credited to the electronic credit ledger of such person.
iv U/s. 49(1) of CGGST Act, 2017:- Every deposit made towards tax, interest, penalty, fee or any other amount by a person by internet banking or by using credit or debit cards or Na

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fecting exempt supplies under the said Acts, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the said taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies.
5.2 As per the above stipulated provisions of section 17(2) of CGGST Act, 2017 any registered recipient can claim ITC to the extent of taxable stock or taxable outward supply shown in their returns. The registered recipient cannot claim ITC on the amount of taxable supply component included in the total amount of exempted supply. The amount of unclaimed ITC shall also be reversed in the electronic ledger of the same month.
Thus it is clear from the above legal provisions that if the applicant supplies seeds (exempted item) in packaged form using such packing materials (taxable item), to its own branches in other States, then no ITC could be claimed on the packaging material used for the said exempted supply of seeds. Whereas, if the applicant supplies only packing material to own branches in ot

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of CGST, Pune-I Versus Trimurti Plast Containers Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of CGST, Pune-I Versus Trimurti Plast Containers Pvt. Ltd.
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 989 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 6-6-2018
APPLICATION No. E/ROM/85360/2018 APPEAL No. E/87246/2017 – M/85567/2018
Central Excise
Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (Judicial)
Shri A.B. Kulgod, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for appellant
Ms. Ankita Vashishtha, Advocate, for respondent
ORDER
Heard both sides.
2. This miscellaneous application is filed seeking rectifi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Gupta Traders Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others

M/s Gupta Traders Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 619 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 40 (All), 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. J74 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-6-2018
Writ Tax No. 906 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal And Hon'ble Jayant Banerji, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Udai Chandani
For the Respondent : C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.
ORDER
The goods under inter-state transportation were seized due to non-payment of U.P.G.S.T. and a sum of Rs. 1,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

New Shiva Transport Service And Another Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others

New Shiva Transport Service And Another Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 425 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 43 (All), 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 176 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-6-2018
Writ Tax No. 905 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal And Hon'ble Jayant Banerji, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Vishwjit,A.S.G.I.
For the Respondent : C.S.C.
ORDER
Heard Sri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rajesh Tripathi, appearing for the respondent no. 2.
The goods under transportation along with vehicle were seized vide seizure memo order dated 25.05.2018, under Section 129(1) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
The submission of Sri Vishwjit, learned couns

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. SEYADU BEEDI COMPANY Versus THE ASSISTANT TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE), THE STATE TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE) AND THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

M/s. SEYADU BEEDI COMPANY Versus THE ASSISTANT TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE), THE STATE TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE) AND THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
GST
2018 (6) TMI 424 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-6-2018
W. P. (C). No. 18490 of 2018
GST
MR. P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : SRI.AJI V.DEV And SMT.O.A.NURIYA
For The Respondent : SRI. V.K. SHAMSUDEEN
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the first respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act.
2. It is seen that an identical matter has been disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Shanti Gears Ltd. Versus Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Coimbatore)

M/s. Shanti Gears Ltd. Versus Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Coimbatore)
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 378 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 6-6-2018
Appeal No. E/42615/2017 – Final Order No. 41747 / 2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member ( Judicial )
Shri Sai Prasanth, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC ( AR ) for the Respondent
ORDER
Brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in manufacturing gears, gear boxes and accessories. During the course of verification of their accounts, it was noticed that they are also doing trading activity from their factory premises by way of selling inputs/raw materials purchased from other units and cleared the same to their customers after reversing the duty of the credit availed on the same. According to the department, such activity tantamounts to trading and the assessee is liable to pay an amount of 5% or 6% on the value of trading (“exempted service”) in te

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

added to the definition of exempted service, clarifying that exempted service includes trading. Thus, when the appellants have removed the inputs as such, the same amounts to trading and, therefore, they are liable to pay an amount of 5%/6% of the value of traded goods. That the impugned order does not call for interference.
4. Heard both sides.
5. It is seen from the submission made by both sides as well as the records that the appellants have reversed the credit, as under Rule 3(5), when they have cleared the goods as such. In a normal trading activity, the goods which are procured, are sold and there is no question of availing the credit of such goods or clearing them on the payment of duty. In the present case, the appellant has availed credit on the inputs and, in some circumstances, they were not able to use the goods in the manufacture of final products. They have opted to clear the goods as such, under the provision of Rule 3(5) by reversing the credit. The Tribunal, in the c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tes the finding of the impugned order. He emphasizes on para 6 of the impugned order. He further submits that all the judgements relied upon by the appellant have been dealt with by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) and the same have been distinguished.
4. I have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides and perused the records. The Revenue has demanded the amount under Rule 6 equal to 5%/6% of the value of the traded goods i.e. steel sheets sold to their vendor. There is no dispute that the said removal is governed by Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It is admitted fact that the appellant has cleared the said steel sheets on payment of duty. The department is considering the said clearances as exempted service being a trading activity. I find that though this removal of steel sheets is indeed a trading activity, but the said clearances were made on payment of excise duty. Therefore, it cannot be considered as an exempted service. Rule 6 applies on the t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on export of Goods-Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and Clarification in other cases -reg.

Refund of IGST on export of Goods-Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and Clarification in other cases -reg.
15/2018 Dated:- 6-6-2018 Circular
Customs
Circular No.15/2018-Customs
F. No: 450/119/2017-CusIV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs)
*****
Room No.227-B, North Block,
New Delhi dated 6th June, 2018
To,
All Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of Customs/ Customs & Central Tax / Customs (Preventive)
All Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs/ Customs & Central Tax / Customs (Preventive)
All Director Generals under CBIC.
Subject: Refund of IGST on export of Goods-Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

filed up to 30.04.2018. However, the exporters are advised to align their export invoices submitted to Customs and GST authorities for smooth processing of refund claims.
2. Apart fromSB005 errors, IGST refunds are also stuck on account of SB003 error on the customs side. This error occurs when there is a mismatch between GSTIN entity mentioned in the Shipping bill and the one filing GSTR-1/GSTR-3B. Board has examined the issue and it has been decided to provide a correction facility in cases where although GSTIN of both the entities are different but PAN is same. This happens mostly in cases where an entity filing Shipping bill is a registered office and the entity which has paid the IGST is manufacturing unit/other office or vice versa.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Applicable GST rate on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLCs), Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and other similar scrips –regarding

Applicable GST rate on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLCs), Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and other similar scrips –regarding
46/20/2018 Dated:- 6-6-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
Circular No. 46/20/2018-GST
F. No. 354/149/2017 -TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Tax Research Unit
******
North Block, New Delhi
Dated the 6th June, 2018
To
The Principal Chief Commissioner/ Principal Directors General/Chief Commissioner/ Directors General/Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of Central Excise and Central Tax (All) / Director General of Systems
Madam / Sir,
Subject: Applicable GST rate on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLCs), Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ater on, Circular No. 34/8/2018- GST dated 01.03.2018 (S.No.3) was issued clarifying that PSLCs are taxable as goods at a standard rate of 18 % under the residual entry S. No. 453 of Schedule III of notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
4. As a result, there is lack of clarity on the applicable rate of GST on various scrips/ certificates like RECs, PSLCs etc.
5. The matter has been re-examined. GST rate of 18 % under the residual entry at S.No. 453 of Schedule III of notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) applies only to those goods which are not covered under any other entries of Schedule I, II, IV, V, or VI of the notification. In other words, if any goods are covered under any of the entries of Schedule I, II, IV, V, or VI,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC wrongly availed

ITC wrongly availed
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ankit TMI Dated:- 5-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 8-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 8 Replies
GST
What are the interest and penal liability in case a supplier has wrongly availed CGST / SGST credit against IGST. However, the same has been reversed before utilisation. Kindly quote specific section that affects the said scenario.
Thanks
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
If interest @24% is paid along with reversal of ITC which was wrongly availed before issuance of SCN then there would be no penal actions initiated by the Department.
Reply By Ankit TMI:
The Reply:
Thanks you sir for your response. Can you please help me out with exact provision which levy interest in such a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

PORT CODE for GSTR 1 EXPORT Sheet

PORT CODE for GSTR 1 EXPORT Sheet
Query (Issue) Started By: – VIRAL SHAH Dated:- 5-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 6-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
What is the port code for following transaction
I am doing retail export from Indian Post ( i.e. sending parcels out of India through Indian Speed Post)
Indian Post not giving me any Shipping Bill.
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
Please check the following links for the details
http://accmumbai.gov.in/aircargo/import/faq.html
Further, vide Customs Notification No. 48/2018 dtd. 04th June 2018 Exports by Post Regulations, 2018 has been notified by the Hon'ble under Secretary to the Government of India. These Regulations shall apply to export of goods by any pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: IMS Proschool Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: IMS Proschool Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 681 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 241 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 5-6-2018
GST-ARA-37/2017-18/B-44
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by IMS PROSCHOOL PVT LTD., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions:
Q.1. – “Whether educational courses offered by the Applicant which have been approved by National Skill Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “NSDC”) would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Q.3 are Yes, then whether the benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the Applicant?”
Q.5.- “If answer to Q.4 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational courses are offered to corporates and business institutions?”
Q.6.- “Whether the NSDC approved educational courses which are actually imparted by the business partners of the Applicant, on behalf of the Applicant as sub-contractor of Applicant, at various centres located across the country, will be considered as offered by the Applicant?”
Q.7. – “If answer to Q.6 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 172017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the Applicant?”
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the sa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CCA, Fitter – Mechanical Assembly, Basic Electrical, Sales Person Retail etc. across many cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Hyderabad, Gurgaon, Kochi and several districts of Gujarat.
II.3 The Applicant is engaged, in the business of skilling the youth with the objective of helping them find decent job, make them employable and to help them earn better living. This includes preparing graduates and working professionals to appear for various National and International certifications for career development needs, including NCFM Financial Modelling, Financial Analysis, Management Accounting, Business Analytics and Various other post graduate programs. in areas of finance, business analytics and marketing as well as technical programs such as Fitter, Basic Electrical and Sales Person Retail.
II.4 For imparting the aforesaid training, the Applicant has developed its own proprietary training formats, materials and methodology, which are conducted at its cen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

anagement, Lovely Professional University, Chartered Financial Institute, Chartered Institute of Management Accountant.
II.8 Applicant has obtained registration under Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred to as 'GST') regime in states of Maharashtra, Haryana, New Delhi, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Gujarat.
STATEMENT CONTAINING APPLICANT'S INTERPRETATION OF LAW AND OR FACTS AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN RESPECT OF QUESTION(S) ON WHICH ADVANCE RULING IS REQUIRED.
Question of law
Question of law: (1) “Whether educational courses offered by the Applicant which have been approved by National Skill Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “NSDC”) would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC?”
IV.1. The Applicant submits that in the present case, the Advance Ruling sought by the Applicant relates to the matter as to:
“Whether educational courses offered by the Applicant which have been approved by National Skill

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erewith as Exhibit 2.
IV.4. The following educational courses (hereinafter referred to as 'approved educational courses') till date, have been already approved by NSDC:
(1) Financial modelling
(2) Financial analyst
(3) Management accounting
(4) Strategic management accounting
(5) Business accounting
(6) Financial planning
(7) Business analytics
(8) Sales person retail
(9) Basic electrical training
(10 CGSC Fitter Mechanical Assembly
(11) Data Science
(12) IFRS
Copy of the approval received from NSDC in relation to all the aforesaid educational courses have been enclosed herewith as ''Exhibit 3.”
GST provisions
IV.4. Entry 69 to the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 ('the Notification') exempts from GST levy:
Education services (specified under HSN 9992) provided by:
(a) the National Skill Development Corporation set up by the Government of India;
(b) a Sector Skill Council approved by the National Skill Development Corporation;
(c) an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Scheme; or
(iii) any other Scheme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation
IV.6. The Applicant would like to submit that the Scheme mentioned above under Sr. No. (ii) and (iii), has been specifically implemented by the respective Govt. department /organisation. For example, NSDC has implemented various Schemes such as PMKK, PMKVY, Udaan, International Skill Training, etc., which would get covered under Sr. No. (iii) mentioned above. Further, various courses have been announced under National Skill Certification and Monetary Reward Scheme which will get covered as vocational skill development courses at Sr. No. (ii) above. Therefore, any educational course which are in connection to such specified schemes or vocational courses, will be liable to GST exemption under the Notification.
IV-7. The Applicant would like to further submit that, till date, NSDC has not announced explicitly any course / programme which would be considered as part of National Skill Development

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

such stakeholders, rather than undertaking initiatives directly and duplicating efforts.
IV.10. It is evident from the above that, NSDC to achieve its objectives, does not undertake / implement any schemes, programmes on its own, rather, it has partnered with various training institutions imparting training courses /programmes related to skill development.
IV-11. Basis the information available on NSDC portal (hereinafter referred to as 'SDMS'), we understand that the educational courses offered by NSDC training partners, should contain pre-defined qualification standards / knowledge parameters. In this regard, Ministry of Human Resource Development has designed and notified qualification assurance framework i.e. National Vocational Education Qualifications Framework (hereinafter referred to as 'NVEQF'), which outlines qualifications / levels / competencies of knowledge and skills that a learner must possess, for the purpose of getting any given job role. Within such NVEQF framework,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ired to align their education courses with defined QP / NOS within identified skill sector. Accordingly, at time of seeking approval for educational courses, each NSDC training partner is required to give an affidavit / declaration to NSDC, giving reference of pre-defined QP / NOS to demonstrate alignment of such course with that is contained in such educational courses.
IV.14. Having said that, the Applicant would like to submit that keeping in mind the objective of NSDC of focusing on employability through placement in industry or self – employment, the approved educational courses offered by the Applicant is linked with different sector or industry. Also, the curriculum of each of the educational courses offered by the Applicant, is aligned to pre-defined QP/ NOS.
Syllabus, training delivery plan and QP / NOS reference in relation to 12 NSDC approved educational courses which are offered by the Applicant have been enclosed herewith as 'Exhibit-6'
IV.15. The Applicant would like t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ements of the Applicant;
* Details of each and every student who was enrolled with the Applicant such as personal details, date of enrolment, date of passing out, batch start and end date, training status, etc.;
* Status of active and inactive educational centres of the Applicant;
* Details of corporate training programs;
* Details of any other skilling schemes
The documentary evidence of sharing the aforesaid information by the Applicant with NSDC has been enclosed herewith as 'Exhibit-8'.
IV.18. Further, NSDC conducts candidate data validation exercise every year, in which details of each candidate reported by the Applicant on SDMS (NSDC portal) is validated and verified. Furthermore, NSDC in their emails sent to the Applicant for sharing information related to target achievement of the Applicant, has specified that annual performance review of the Applicant will be done by MSDE and hence, the training and placements details will be shared with MSDE.
IV.19. The Applicant w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ement of approved training partners would be counted as accomplishment of the said objectives of NSDC. Accordingly, all the approved educational courses conducted by the Applicant should be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC.
I. Question Of law: (2) “The Applicant offers certain educational courses for which qualification standards / framework i.e. QP/ NOS has not been defined by NSDC and will be approved by NSDC as and when the relevant QP/ NOS would be defined by NSDC. In the interim period, NSDC has given exceptional approval on such courses. Till the time QP/ NOS are defined for such educational courses and are eventually approved by NSDC, whether such courses will be treated as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC?”
V.1. The Applicant submits that in the present case, the Advance Ruling sought by the Applicant relates to the matter as to:
“The Applicant offers certain educational courses for wh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tline QP / NOS for other job roles.
NSDC's educational course approval process
V.3. In connection to job role / educational course for which NOS / QPs has been already defined by NSDC, for the purpose of obtaining approval from NSDC, the approved training partner of NSDC is required to align their educational courses as per the listed QPs / NOS.
V.4. At present, the step-by-step NSDC course approval process is explained by way of below flow chart:
Identify QP on NSDC website for which course needs to be aligned
 
Prepare affidavit cum declaration in prescribed format
 
Upload declaration on NSDC website (SDMS)
 
Obtain approval online on SDMS
V.4. In connection to job role for which NOS / QPs has not been outlined yet by NSDC, NSDC is providing conditional approval to such courses, by earmarking status of approval of such course on SDMS ('NSDC portal') as 'exception'. Later, as and when QP/ NOS would be defined by NSDC, the approved training partner would be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ption, have been enclosed herewith as 'Exhibit-9'.
V.7. The Applicant would like to submit that such exceptional approved educational courses are aimed to develop the skills of the candidates and help them to find a job or better job role. Further, the Company while reporting its achievement of skill developments targets to NSDC includes details of such courses as well.
V.8. Given this, the Applicant is of the opinion that such courses are directed towards the objectives of NSDC of skill development and reducing unemployment in India and accordingly, should be equated as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by the NSDC.
II. Question of law: (3) “In certain situations, NSDC approved educational courses are subsequently, upgraded by the Applicant within pre-defined QP/ NOS framework, by way of adding more topics/ content /modules. However, such modified version of NSDC approved educational courses have not been approved by NSDC yet. Whether such modified ve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s are not deleted from it, only, supplementary modules / programs are added to it and aligned with corresponding pre-defined QP/ NOS, in order to make the same, lucrative to the candidates, educational institutions, corporates, etc.
VI.3. The Applicant has obtained approval from NSDC at inception however, subsequent to up- gradation, in connection with such modified versions of already existing approved educational courses, the Applicant is yet to receive approval from NSDC.
VI.4. The Applicant would like to submit that the aforesaid modifications to the already approved educational courses does not change the primary structure of such courses. Such modified versions are aligned to QP / NOS and are more beneficial for students, to enhance their skill.
VI.5. The Applicant would like to further, submit that the modified versions of approved educational courses are included and reported by the Applicant to NSDC, as part of its performance review towards achievements of its skill develo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June provides that:
Education services (specified under HSN 9992) provided by:
(a) the National Skill Development Corporation set up by the Government of India;
(b) a Sector Skill Council approved by the National Skill Development Corporation;
(c) an assessment agency approved by the Sector Skill Council or the National Skill Development Corporation;
(d) a training partner approved by the National Skill Development Corporation or the Sector Skill Council in relation to-
(i) the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation; or
(ii) a vocational skill development course under the National Skill Certification and Monetary Reward Scheme; or
(iii) any Other Scheme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation transaction
Co-relation of the Notification with the facts of Applicant
VII.3. The Applicant is training partner approved by NSDC.
VII.4. As men

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

such educational courses, in terms of the Notification.
Question of law: (5) “If answer to Q.4 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per notification No. 14/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational courses are offered to corporates and business institutions?”
VIII.1. The Applicant submits that in the present case, the Advance Ruling sought by the Applicant relates to the matter as to:
“If answer to Q.4 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational courses are offered to corporates and business institutions”
VIII.2. The Applicant would like to mention that it renders education services to individuals, Govt. institutions and corporates. Certain educational courses such as management accounting, financial modelling, financial analyst, business accounting which are already approved by NSDC, are conducted by t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

triction it is evident that as long as the educational courses offered by the approved training partner are in relation to the National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC, GST exemption would be available, irrespective of constitution of the recipient.
VIII.6. The Applicant would like to submit that the educational courses which have been approved by NSDC and are reported to NSDC towards achievements of skill development targets of the Applicant and are in relation to the National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC, regardless of being offered to business corporates or colleges or individuals and GST exemption should be available on the same.
IV. Question of law: (6) “Whether the NSDC approved educational courses which are actually imparted by the business partners of the Applicant, on behalf of the Applicant as sub-contractor of Applicant, at various centres located across the country, will be considered as offered by the Applicant?”
IX.1. The Applicant s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iness partners namely, Business Partner Agreement, wherein the scope of services rendered by business partners, responsibility and obligations of both namely, the business partners and the Applicant and other terms and conditions have been listed.
Sample copy of the Business Partner Agreement and corresponding invoices raised by such business partners upon the Applicant have been enclosed herewith as 'Exhibit-10'.
IX.4. The key features of the Business Agreement are elucidated below:
* business partner to conduct educational courses and training services for specified courses, under the instructions of the Applicant, in the designated area, for definite period.
* for facilitating provision of such services under the Business Partner Agreement, the Applicant has permitted the business partner to use 'PROSCHOOL' training materials, training formats, know-how and expertise.
* the Applicant has granted non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-assignable, royalty free, limited term, to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he business partner who in turn will give the same to the students.
* Business partner is required to maintain financial and Other records in the specified format, as required by the Applicant.
* The premises that will be used by business partner under the said agreement would be acquired by the Applicant, under a lease arrangement. In other words, the centre will be taken on lease basis for which lease agreement is in the name of the Applicant and the lease rentals will be paid by the Applicant.
* Business partner is required to make available requisite infrastructure such as office, classroom library, furniture, electricity, other amenities in the specified area as approved by the Applicant, which is mandatory for business partner to effectively render services for training students.
* Consideration payable to business partner is computed as specified percentage of net realised fee from student, depending upon nature of educational course offered;
* Business partner and the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed into between faculty and the Applicant,
* sample copy of invoice issued by such faculty upon the Applicant,
* lease agreement between landlord and the Applicant,
* sample copy of rent receipt issued by such landlord upon the Applicant.
IX.6. On simple reading of the aforesaid, it is clearly evident that by and large, all the activities related to the centres run by business partners such as managing faculty, marketing, leasing of centres' premises, providing educational materials, etc. are the responsibilities of the Applicant. Applicant has partnered with the business partner to share few of its obligations such as to provide educational courses to students using the materials, curriculum provided by the Applicant and under the direction of the Applicant, raise invoice upon students in the name and on behalf of the Applicant, collect fees from students on behalf of the Applicant.
IX.7. It is also, clearly visible that the business partner is required to use 'the Company i.e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that the education courses which are conducted at centres managed and run by the business partner on behalf of the Applicant, are the same courses which have either been approved or conditionally approved by NSDC or the upgraded versions of such courses. Therefore, every year the Applicant has included such courses while reporting achievement of its skill development targets to NSDC and NSDC has not raised any objection to such inclusion.
IX.12. Therefore, education courses imparted at centres by business partners on behalf of the Applicant should be construed as in relation to the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the NSDC and GST exemption should be available on the same.
V. Question of law: (7) “'If answer to Q.6 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the Applicant?”
X.1. The Applicant submits that in the present case, the Advance Ruling sought by the Applicant

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onal Skill Development Corporation or the Sector Skill Council in relation to-
(i) the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation; or
(ii) a vocational skill development course under the National Skill Certification and Monetary Reward Scheme; or
(iii) any other Scheme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation transaction
X.4. Since, the educational courses by the Applicant through business partners, are in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC therefore, the Applicant is eligible for GST exemption in connection with such educational courses, in terms of the Notification.
PRAYER IN ADVANCE RULING
Given the facts and circumstances, the Applicant prays before the Hon'ble Authority that:
* The educational courses approved by NSDC and conducted by the Applicant should be treated as is in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC.
* The educational c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
IMS Proschool Pvt Ltd the applicant is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Mumbai, Maharashtra.
The Applicant is an initiative of IMS Learning Resources and offers educational training and skilling courses through classroom training and virtual coaching, in many areas such as data science. Digital marketing, IFRS, ACCA, Fitter-Mechanical Assembly, Basic Electrical, Sales Person Retail etc. across many cities in India Including Mumbai, Pune, Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Hyderabad, Gurgaon, Kochi and several districts of Gujarat.
The Applicant is engaged, in the business of skilling the youth with the objective of helping them find decent job, make them employable and to help them earn better living. This includes preparing graduates and working professionals to appear for various National and international certifications for career development needs, including NCFM Financial Mod

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hich QP/NOS have not been defined by NSDC yet, have been conditionally approved by NSDC. All such courses offered by the Applicant are directed for skill development and to increase employability in India.
The Applicant has tie-ups with various educational institutes/Govt. organizations, including NSDC.. National Stock Exchange Academy, Symbiosis International University, Indira Institute of Management, Lovely Professional University, Chartered Financial Institute, Chartered Institute of Management Accountant.
The applicant has raised following query:-
Qs.No.
Questions raised by the applicant
Submission as per ACT & RULE
1.
Whether educational courses offered by the applicant which have been approved by National Skill Development Corporation would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC?
Yes. As the applicant is engaged, in the business of skilling the youth with the objective of helping them find decent job, make them employable

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be available for every job role in each industry sector. These drive both the creation of curriculum, and assessments. These job roles would be at various proficiency levels, and aligned to the NSQF. Example would be Qualification Pack of a Sales Associate Sector Skill Councils are responsible for the creation of QPs and NOSs. These Occupational Standards are open for public viewing for a month on http://www.nsdcindia.org/nos. All those who have participated in development and validation of standards as well as the industry are informed by the SSC that the Occupational Standards have been published for comments. All comments/ feedback received during the period will be responded to by respective Sector Skill Council under intimation to NSDC. After one month of public viewing, these standards Will be promulgated as National Standards.
As of 31st March 2015, across 28 Sectors, standards for 1319 Job Roles pegged at NSQF levels 1 to 8 have been defined by the Sector Skill Councils. 14 S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

?
No.
6.
Whether the NSDC approved educational courses which are actually imparted by the business partners of the Applicant, on behalf of the Applicant as sub-contractor of Applicant, at various centers located across the country, will be considered as offered by the Applicants?
Should be approved by the NSDC not for sub-contract of the applicant.
7.
If answer to Q.6 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the applicant?
Should be approved by the NSDC not for sub-contract of the applicant.
NSDC (BACKGROUND) : Skill India is an initiative of the Government of India which has been launched to empower the youth of the country with skill sets which make them more employable and more productive in their work environment. Our National Skill Mission is chaired by the Hon'ble Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi himself. India is a country today with 65% of its youth in the working age gro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e. 1.04 Crore Indians were trained through Central Government Programs and NSDC associated training partners in the private sector.
For the first time in 68 years of India's independence, a Ministry for Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (MSDE) has been formed to focus on enhancing employability of the youth through skill development. The skill ecosystem in India, is seeing some great reforms and policy interventions which is reinvigorating and re-energising the country's workforce today; and is preparing the youth for job and growth opportunities in the international market. The Hon'ble Prime Minister's flagship scheme, Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) alone, has till date seen close to 20 lakh people get skilled and prepared for a new successful India.
Skill India harbours responsibility for ensuring implementation of Common norms across all skill development programs in the country so that they are all standardized and aligned to one object. The ITI ecosystem has also

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

x Officer appeared and made written submissions.
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 24.04.2018, Sh. Santosh Dalvi, Advocate alongwith Ms. Shradha Didwania, Sh. Sanjay Choudhary CEO, Sh. Ajay Nayak, C.A., Sh. Tanveer Bhagat, C.A. and Ms. Aarti Shetty appeared and made oral contentions as per their written submissions which were taken on record, Jurisdictional Officer, Ms. R. S. lyer Sales Tax Officer appeared and stated that they have already made their written submissions.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We have perused the records on file and have gone through the facts of the case and oral and written submissions made by the applicant as well as the department.
We find that M/s. IMS Proschool Private Limited, the applicant is a company under the Companies Act.
The applicant is claiming that they are in the business of skilling the youth with the objective of helping them find decent jobs, make them employable and to help them earn a better living. The applicant claim

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

“) would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC?
And in continuation of the same their further query is that whether they are eligible for exemption from GST as per Serial No. 69 of Notification No. 12/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 and if so, in respect of which services being provided by them would they be eligible for exemption under Sr.No. 69 of the above said Notification.
We find that rest of their queries in the present application would rest on their above two main queries. In view of this we would first be required to ascertain if the educational courses that are being offered by the applicant and approved by NSDC can be taken to be in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC.
We find that at the time of the preliminary hearing they were orally requested to confirm and obtain in writing from NSDC as to what are the programmes that are being undertaken by NSDC under National Skill Deve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ection (I) of section 9 of the said Act, as is in excess of the said tax calculated at the rate as specified in the corresponding entry in column (4) of the said Table, unless specified otherwise, subject to the relevant conditions as specified in the corresponding entry in column (5) of the said Table.
From the details of the relevant Notification we find that the applicant is claiming that they are eligible for exemption as given in Sr. No. 69 of the above said Notification. We find that the specific exemption that the applicant is claiming is as under:-
Any services provided by, _
(a) …………………
(b) …………………
(c) …………………
(d) a training partner approved by the National Skill Development Corporation or the Sector Skill Council, in relation to-
(i) the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation; or
(ii) a vocational skill development course under the National Skill Certification a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r.
Secondly we are required to examine if the applicant who is an approved training partner of M/s. NSDC is providing any services in relation to National Skill Development Program implemented by M/s. NSDC.
With regard to the above we are required to ascertain as to what is the National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC. We find that M/s. NSDC is a non-profit company set up by the Ministry of Finance which aims to promote skill development by catalysing creation of large, quality and for profit vocational institutions. For this purpose it –
1. provides funding to build scalable and profitable vocational training initiatives
2. to enable support system which focuses on quality assurance, information systems and train the trainer academies either directly or through partnerships.
3. It acts as a catalysing skill development by providing funding to enterprises, companies and organizations that provides skill training.
4. It also develops appropriate modules t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n system that offers a unique platform for the industries to partner on various such initiatives. NSDC works with diverse set of stakeholders such as Corporates, Foundations, Government and Community based Organisations in structuring high impact collaborative skill development projects.
We find that the benefit of exemption as given at Sr. NO. 69 of Notification 12/2017-CT (Rate) as claimed to be applicable by the applicant in the present case is in respect of any services provided by a training partner approved by the NSDC or the Sector Skill Council in relation to the National Skill Development Program implemented by the NSDC or any other scheme implemented by the NSDC.
Thus we find that the matter rests on the fact as to what is National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC.
We find that Skill India is an initiative of the Government of India which has been launched to empower the youth of the country with skill sets which make them more employable and more producti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Prime Minister on 15 July 2015, has gathered tremendous steam under the guidance of Shri Rajiv Pratap Rudy, Union Minister of State for Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, during the last one year. The target to train more than a crore fresh entrants into the Indian workforce has been substantially achieved for the first time. 1.04 Crore Indians were trained through Central Government Programs and NSDC associated training partners in the private sector.
For the first time in 68 years of India's independence, a Ministry for Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (MSDE) has been formed to focus on enhancing employability of the youth through skill development. The skill ecosystem in India, is seeing some great reforms and policy interventions which is reinvigorating and re-energising the country's workforce today; and is preparing the youth for job and growth opportunities in the international market. The Hon'ble Prime Minister's flagship scheme, Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s population in the coming years. Developing a comprehensive and holistic policy document is an integral part of the process. This requires a fresh look at the already existing National Policy on Skill Development (NPSD), 2009.
The objective of the National Policy on Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, 2015 will be to meet the challenge of skilling at scale with speed and standard (quality). It will aim to provide an umbrella framework to all skilling activities being carried out within the country, to align them to common standards and link the skilling with demand centres. In addition to laying down the objectives and expected outcomes, the effort will also be to identify the various institutional frameworks which can act as the vehicle to reach the expected outcomes. The national policy will also provide clarity and coherence on how skill development efforts across the country can be aligned within the existing institutional arrangements. This policy will link skills developme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ill Certification and Monetary Reward Scheme
(iii) Any other scheme implemented by the NSDC.
Thus it is clearly stated by them that they are not covered and are not eligible for exemption under Sr No (ii) and (iii) as mentioned in Sr. No. 69 of Notification 12/2017-CentraI Tax.
We find that the applicant is further claiming in their application that NSDC has not announced explicitly any course programme which would be considered as part of National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC, It is reiterated that at the time of hearing they were requested to confirm and obtain in writing from NSDC as to what are the programmes that are being undertaken by NSDC under National Skill Development Programme and submit the same. However nothing in this regard had been submitted by the applicant from NSDC. Therefore in absence of any explicit National Skill Development Programme which can be considered as implemented by NSDC, we need to examine and determine under what circumstanc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

espect to implementation of its programme related to National Skill Development Programme.
But from the facts of the case as put up by the applicant before this authority, we find that some of the courses of vocational training that have been designed by the applicant are approved and certified by  NSDC and thus we find that the services in this respect being in the nature of approval and certification of course being provided by NSDC to the applicant and not by the applicant to NSDC and thus there is no question of the applicant being eligible for any exemption in this respect as they are a services recipient and not service provider in relation to NSDC.
In addition to this we also find secondly that, the claim of the applicant with respect to GST is also made by the applicant basing their contentions on the premise that there is no explicit National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC.
Here in view of the above we are required to examine National Policy on Skil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

kill Development Policy
a) Institution based skill development including ITIs/ITCs/vocational schools/ technical schools/ polytechnics/ professional colleges, etc.
b) Learning initiatives of sectoral skill development organized by different ministries/departments.
c) Formal and informal apprenticeships and other types of training by enterprises.
d) Training for self-employment/ entrepreneurial development.
e) Adult learning, retraining of retired or retiring employees and lifelong learning.
f) Non-formal training including training by civil society organisations.
g) E- web-based learning and distance learning.
The objective of the National Policy on Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, 2015 will be to meet the challenges of skilling at scale with speed and standard (quality). It would aim to provide an umbrella framework to all skilling activities being carried out within the country, to align them to common standards and link the skilling with demand centres.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ordinate skilling efforts, but also expedite decision making across sectors to achieve skilling at scale with speed and standards. It will be implemented through a streamlined institutional mechanism driven by Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE). Key institutional mechanisms for achieving the objectives of the Mission have been divided into three tiers, which will consist of a Governing Council for policy guidance at apex level, a Steering Committee and a Mission Directorate (along with an Executive Committee) as the executive arm of the Mission. Mission Directorate will be supported by three other institutions:
1. National Skill Development Agency (NSDA).
2. National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) and
3. Directorate General of Training (DGT) –
all of which will have horizontal linkages with Mission Directorate to facilitate smooth functioning of the national institutional mechanism. Seven sub-missions have been proposed initially to act as buildi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Training Institutes – play a vital role in the economy by providing skilled manpower in different sectors with varying levels of expertise. IT Is are affiliated by National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT). DGT also operationalises the amended Apprentices Act, 1961.
2. National Skill Development Agency (NSDA)
The National Skill Development Agency (NSDA), an autonomous body, (registered as a Society under the Society's Registration Act 1860) was created with the mandate to co-ordinate and harmonise the skill development activities in the country, is part of the Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (MSDE).
Functions : Gazette Notification of NSDA
* Take all possible steps to meet skilling targets as envisaged in the 12th Five Year Plan and beyond.
* Coordinate and harmonize the approach to skill development among various Central Ministries/ Department. State Governments, the NSDC and the Private sector.
* Anchor and operationalize the NSQF to ensure that

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ther actions taken by the NSDA are as under:
1. Rationalization of the Skill Development Schemes of the Government of India
2. Creation of an integrated Labour Market Information System
3. Engagement with States
4. Skills Innovation Initiative
3. National Skill Development Corporation
The National Skill Development Corporation India (NSDC) was setup as a one of its kind, Public Private Partnership Company with the primary mandate of catalysing the skills landscape in India. NSDC is a unique model created with a well thought through underlying philosophy based on the following pillars:
* 1. Create: Proactively catalyse creation of large, quality vocational training institutions.
* 2. Fund: Reduce risk by providing patient capital. Including grants and equity.
* 3. Enable: the creation and sustainability of support systems required for skill development. This includes the Industry led Sector Skill Councils.
The main objectives of the NSDC are to:
* Upgrade sk

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

kills competitions and participation in Special Initiatives like Udaan focused on J&K.
* International Engagement – Investments, technical assistance, transnational standards, overseas jobs and other areas.
* Central Ministries – Participation in flagship programmes like Make in India, Swachh Bharat, Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, Smart City, Digital India and Namami Ganga, among many others.
* State Governments – Development of programs and schemes, alignment to NSQF and capacity building, operationalization Of program, capacity building efforts among others.
* University/SchooI systems – Vocationalisation of education through specific training programs, evolution of credit framework, entrepreneur development, etc.
* Non-profit organizations – Capacity building of marginalized and special groups, development of livelihood, self-employment and entrepreneurship programs.
* Innovation – Support to early-stage social entrepreneurs working on innovative business models to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mentation agency for the largest voucher-based skill development program, Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana.
Skill Development Management System (SDMS) with 1400 training partners, 28179 training centres, 16479 trainers, 20 Job portals, 77 assessment agencies and 4983 empanelled assessors. Hosting infrastructure certified by ISO 20000/27000 supported by dedicated personnel.
4. National Skill Development Fund
The National Skill Development Fund was set up in 2009 by the Government of India for raising funds both from Government and Non Government sectors for skill development in the country. The Fund is contributed by various Government sources, and other donors/ contributors to enhance, stimulate and develop the skills of Indian youth by various sector specific programs. A public Trust set up by the Government of India is the custodian of the Fund. The Trust accepts donation, contribution in cash or kind from the Contributors for furtherance of objectives of the Fund. The Fund

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

set up as autonomous industry-led bodies by NSDC. They create Occupational Standards and Qualification bodies, develop competency framework, conduct Train the Trainer Programs, conduct skill gap studies and Assess and Certify trainees on the curriculum aligned to National Occupational Standards developed by them.
As on date 37 Sector Skill Councils are operational. There are over 600 Corporate Representatives in the Governing Councils of these SSCs.
In view of the above we clearly find that in broader terms there is National Policy on Skill Development which is very broad and has a very broad vision as well. It envisions the establishment of a National Skill Development initiatives with the following mission:-
“National Skill Development initiative will empower all individuals through improved skills, knowledge, nationally and internationally recognized qualifications to gain access to decent employment and ensure India's competiveness in the global markets.
Within this broad p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t before the phrase 'Skill Development Programme' it becomes National Skill development Programme and it limits its scope and restricts it only to the activities/ efforts that are undertaken through Government funding, Government Schemes and specifically designed Government Programmes.
We find that National Skill Development Programme would consist of the schemes, actions and deeds that are actually done or are mandated to be done by various ministries, Government departments or their attached offices, Directorates or other institutions as per their instructions and for which expenses in that regard are to be incurred by the Central or State Governments through budgetary provisions. The intent of the Notification No. 12/2017-CT as discussed above provides that exemption would be available only in respect of “Any services provided by a Training partner approved by National Skill Development Corporation in relation to the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the NSDC.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion will be done across six sets of criteria:
* Employer view of demand for the specific skills
* Alignment with the NSDC's mission
* Robustness Of overall plan and operating model
* Ability to leverage partnerships
* Ability to leverage financial requirements
* Ability to leverage management capability
Thus we find that the above functions of NSDC are in the nature of encouraging and supporting private sector in skill development which is also one of its mandate and functions. Apart from this it is also the implementing agency for various schemes such as Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana , Sankalp, Udaan, etc.
Thus it can be easily seen that if the intent of the Legislature had been to extend the benefit of exemption of present Notification in respect of all activities in relation to skill development done by NSDC, in that case the wordings Of the Notification would not have been restrictive, which is very clear when we see that in the Notification, exemption b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n view of this we find that the National Skill Development Programme would cover only the actual schemes and programmes of skill development that are undertaken by the Government through its various ministries, departments, directorates, attached offices and organizations and cannot in any way be construed to be including each and every activity under the sun which enhances skills in one way or other.
06. In view of the deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass the order as under :
ORDER
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-37/2017-18/B-44
Mumbai, dt. 05.06.2018
For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the question is answered thus –
Q.1. – “Whether educational courses offered by the Applicant which have been approved by National Skill Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “NSDC”) would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme impleme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Development Programme implemented by NSDC?”
Answer :- Answered in the negative.
Q.4.- “If the answer to Q.1, Q.2 and Q.3 are Yes, then whether the benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 14/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the Applicant?”
Answer :- No, in view of answers to Q.No. 1, 2 and 3 above.
Q.5. – “If answer to Q.4 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 17/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational courses are offered to corporates and business institutions?”
Answer:- No, in view of answers to Questions above.
Q.6.- “Whether the NSDC approved educational courses which are actually imparted by the business partners of the Applicant, on behalf of the Applicant as sub-contractor of Applicant, at various centres located across the country, will be considered as offered by the Applicant?”
Answer:- Not relevant and not being answered in view of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Krishna Enterprises Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others

M/s Krishna Enterprises Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others
GST
2018 (9) TMI 367 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 42 (All)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-6-2018
WRIT TAX No. 904 of 2018
GST
Mr. Pankaj Mithal and Mr. Jayant Banerji, JJ.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
ORDER
Heard Shri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the State-respondents.
The goods of the petitioner under transportation along with the vehicle have been seized vide order dated 08.05.2018 passed under Section 129(1) of U.P.G.S.T Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as the 'Act, 2017').
The argument advanced by the learned counsel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Unimech Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Coimbatore

M/s. Unimech Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Coimbatore
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 1573 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 5-6-2018
Appeal No. E/42488/2017 – Final Order No. 41719/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Shri K. Subash Chandiran, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniam, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Brief facts are that the appellants are manufacturers of 'Tractor parts' and are registered under the category of 'Goods Transport Agency' service. During the audit of their accounts, it was noticed that they have wrongly availed CENVAT credit of Rs. 3,38,108/- being the service tax paid on GTA service for the period Apri

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax Vs. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. – 2018 (9) GSTL 33 (SC). He submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that prior to 1.4.2008, an assessee would be eligible for credit of GTA service upto the buyer's premises whereas after 1.4.2008, the same would not be eligible pursuant to the amendment. It was also argued by him that the department has raised the demand disallowing the credit on inward transportation also. The definition of input service is very much clear that all the services which are used in or in relation to manufacture are eligible for credit. The inward transportation was used for bringing the inputs into the factory and therefore such activities being directly related to the act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

igible for credit on inward transportation, I am of the view that this being for procuring inputs into factory is eligible for credit as these have direct nexus to the manufacturing activity. The appellant has also argued on the ground of limitation. He submitted that during the period of dispute, the decision laid down in the case of ABB Ltd. as well as Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. was in force and therefore the appellant had availed the credit on the bonafide belief that they are eligible for credit. Only after the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (supra), the same has been held to be not eligible. The argument of the ld. Counsel is not without substance. The issue was in litigation and being an interpretation

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CGST & CCE, Trichy Versus M/s. EID Parry India Limited

CGST & CCE, Trichy Versus M/s. EID Parry India Limited
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 1494 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 5-6-2018
E/713/2010 & E/CO/71/2010 – FINAL ORDER No. 41754/2018
Central Excise
Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical) And Shri P. Dinesha, Member (Judicial)
Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC (AR) for the Appellant
Ms. Cynduja Crishnan, Advocate, for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: Madhu Mohan Damodhar
The respondents were a 100 % EOU manufacturing neem based pesticides and organic fertilizers out of raw materials procured indigenously. They applied for exit from 100% EOU scheme for which the Development Commissioner issued a “No objection in principle letter” dated 16.06.2008 and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gned order dated 16.08.2010 allowed the duty exemption on in-process materials amounting to Rs. 10,25,986/-, while upholding the remaining duty liability confirmed by the original authority. The Revenue has come in appeal against the setting aside of the demand in respect of the in-process materials. Respondents have also filed cross-objection against upholding of the remaining demand amounting to Rs. 88,97,261/-.
2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, the Ld. AR Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC, reiterated the grounds of appeal. He drew our attention to Chapter 22 of the Central Excise & Customs Manual as per which, apart from the finished goods, raw materials and semi-finished goods, which were lying at the time of debonding had to be c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

P).
4. Heard both sides and have gone through the facts.
5. We find that the ratio laid down by the Tribunal in Tirumala Seung Han Textiles Ltd. (supra) relied upon by the lower appellate authority and by the Ld. Advocate will apply on all fours to the appeal on hand. The relevant portion of that decision is reproduced as under:-
“5.1 In respect of in-process goods, the appellants have argued that there is no authority for demanding duty. As per Para 6.18 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09, an EOU may opt out of the scheme with the approval of the Development Commissioner subject to the payment of Excise Duty. In the policy, only imported and indigenous capital goods, raw materials, components, consumables, spares and finished goods in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendments in the Order No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 dated the 10th October 2017

Amendments in the Order No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 dated the 10th October 2017
D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 Dated:- 5-6-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, MAHARASHTRA STATE,
GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai 400 010,
dated the 5th June 2018.
Order
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendments in the Order No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 dated the 10th October 2017

Amendments in the Order No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 dated the 10th October 2017
D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 Dated:- 5-6-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, MAHARASHTRA STATE
GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai 400 010,
dated the 5th June 2018.
Order
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 5 read with clause (91) of section 2 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Commissioner of State Tax, Maharashtra State, hereby with effect from 1st July 2017, makes the following am

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendments in the Order No. D.C.(A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8, dated the 10th October 2017.

Amendments in the Order No. D.C.(A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8, dated the 10th October 2017.
D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 Dated:- 5-6-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, MAHARASHTRA STATE,
GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai 400 010,
dated the 5th June 2018.
Order
No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 5 read with claus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Mukesh Mulji Shah, Retired Partner of M/s. Mukesh Dye Works Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Central GST and ors.

Mukesh Mulji Shah, Retired Partner of M/s. Mukesh Dye Works Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Central GST and ors.
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 328 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – 2018 (362) E.L.T. 993 (Bom.)
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-6-2018
Writ Petition No. 12216 of 2017
Central Excise
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H.DANGRE, JJ.
Mr. Hemant G. Dharmadhikari for the petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the respondents.
P.C:
1. The petitioner has approached this Court requesting that the attachment levied on his bank account, more particularly described in the prayer in the petition, be raised.
2. The petitioner has made a categorical statement on facts and that he was a partner earlier in a partnership firm. Howev

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ontinues to be liable, still, the firm challenged the order of adjudication in appeal. That order in original was set aside by the Tribunal. Thereafter, the demand of tax did not survive. If the demand of tax or the liability or debt in that behalf did not survive, there was no question of imposition of any penalty.
Hence, the penalty also does not survive.  
4. As far as the past dues of the department is concerned from two bank accounts, a sum of Rs. 4,74,000/has already been appropriated or adjusted by the Revenue and the balance sum is of Rs. 7,76,708/which the petitioner will pay in a period of six months, but on payment, the attachment be raised.
5. On all these factual matters and aspects, we do not find that in the affidavit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

March 2006. A total amount of Rs. 10,84,614/has been recovered an there is a balance outstanding of Rs. 11,50,708/and Rs. 1,00,000/penalty. Now, this is not an amount or sum disputed by the petitioner at all.
The matter pertains to another case which was booked against the firm and thereafter, the demand in pursuance thereof raised by the order in original was set aside by the Tribunal.
6. Once that order is set aside and in which it included a personal penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs, we do not see how the Department can pursue that demand by attaching the bank account of the petitioner. More so, the petitioner's retirement from the firm with effect from 27th April 1990 is undisputed. Therefore, the request to the petitioner to pay a sum whi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Waiver Of Late Fee For Failure To Furnish Return In Form Gstr-3b

Waiver Of Late Fee For Failure To Furnish Return In Form Gstr-3b
G.O.Ms.No. 290 Dated:- 5-6-2018 Andhra Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Andhra Pradesh SGST
Andhra Pradesh SGST
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
REVENUE (COMMERCIAL TAXES-II) DEPARTMENT
G.O.Ms.No.290, Dated: 05-06-2018
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No.16 of 2017), the Government, on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =