In order to clarify the Special drive “GST refunds fortnight” from 31st May to 14th June, 2018-reg.

In order to clarify the Special drive “GST refunds fortnight” from 31st May to 14th June, 2018-reg.
No. 01/GST/2018-19 Dated:- 8-6-2018 Delhi SGST
GST – States
GOVTERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI
DEPARTMENT OF TRADEAND TAXES
(HUMAN RESOURCE BRANCH)
VYAPAR BHAWAN, I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.
ORDER
No. F.3(174)/Policy-GST/2018/262-74
Dated: 08-06-2018
Trade Notice No. 01/GST/2018-19
Subject: Special drive "GST refunds fortnight" from 31st May to 14th June, 2018-reg.
All the exporters/dealers & Trade Associations are informed that DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & TAXES Govt. of NCT of Delhi is observing a special drive-GST refunds fortnight from 31st May to 14th June, 2018 to intensify the efforts to liquidat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

need to file claims separately with Central and State for refund of CGST and SGST respectively.
• It is not enough to file FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal. Your refund Claim will not be processed until you submit a printout of the form to the jurisdictional tax office.
3. All the officers concerned in the DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & TAXES will deal with cases of GST related refund claims and process them on utmost priority basis. The taxpayers are advised to contact respective ward officers in connection with the refund claims or for any help in this regard.
4. In case any difficulty is faced with regard to the sanction of the refund claims, Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari. Additional Commissioner, 5th Floor, Vyapar Bhawan, IP Estate, New

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Gati-Kintetsu Express Private Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Kharagpur Range & Others

Gati-Kintetsu Express Private Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Kharagpur Range & Others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 558 – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 18 (Cal.) , [2018] 2 GSTL 132 (Cal)
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 8-6-2018
W. P. 6633 (W) of 2018
GST
Debangsu Basak, J.
Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee …for the petitioner
Mr. Abhrotosh Majumder, Ld. A.A.G. Mr. P. Dudhoria Mr. Debasish Ghosh …for the State
ORDER
An order of seizure passed under Section 129(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is under challenge in the present writ petition. The order is appealable under Section 107 of the Act of 2017.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that, the order comes within the purview of Section 121 of the Act of 2017. He submits that, Section 121 of the Act of 2017 carves out an exception of non-appealable decisions and orders and that the impugned order comes within the purview of such Section. Therefore, the writ petition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

provision for filing an appeal.
In response, learned Additional Advocate General submits that, Rule 109 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 allows an appeal to be filed either electronically or otherwise. He submits that, the petitioner may file the appeal either electronically or otherwise.
The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of seizure of vehicle passed by the authorities exercising jurisdiction under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Such an order is appealable under Section 107 of the Act of 2017. Section 107 of the Act of 2017 is as follows :-
“107. Appeals to Appellate Authority.
(1) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under this Act or the Central Goods and Services Tax Act by an adjudicating authority may appeal to such Appellate Authority as may be prescribed within three months from the date on which the said decision or order is communicated to such person.
………………………………….

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on of books of account register and other documents; or
(c) an order sanctioning prosecution under this Act; or
(d) an order passed under section 80.”
Section 121 is an exception to Section 107 of the Act of 2017. While Section 107 of the Act of 2017 makes every decision or order passed under the Act of 2017 to be appealable, Section 121 makes an exception thereto and states that, few which are recognized in Sub-section (a) to (d) would not be appealable.
In the facts of the present case, the petitioner relies upon Section 121(b) and submits that, an order of seizure is not appealable. With respect, Sub-section (b) relates to an order of seizure of books of account, register and other documents. Any other reading of the Sub-section would do violence to the Sub-section itself. If the contention of the petitioner is upheld, any order of seizure, irrespective of the fact as to whether the seizure relates to an immovable property or any other object, apart from books of account, r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD. Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM, STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE GOOD & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE OF K

M/s. BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD. Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM, STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE GOOD & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE OF KERALA TAXES DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT AND GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI
GST
2018 (6) TMI 557 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 8-6-2018
W. P. (C). No. 18855 of 2018
GST
MR. P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. Tomson T. Emmanuel
For The Respondent : Sri. V. K. Shamsudheen And Sreelal N. Warrier
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the first respondent under Sect

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarifications of certain issues under GST– regarding

Clarifications of certain issues under GST– regarding
47/21/2018 Dated:- 8-6-2018 CGST – Circulars
GST
Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST
F. No. CBEC- 20/16/03/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
New Delhi, Dated the 08th June, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All)/
The Principal Directors General/ Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Clarifications of certain issues under GST- regarding
Representations have been received seeking clarification on certain issues under the GST laws. The same have been examined and the clarifications on the same are as below:
Sl. No.
Issue
Clarification
1
Whether moulds and dies owned by Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) that are sent free of cost (FOC) to a component manufacturer is leviable to tax and whether OEMs are required to reverse i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2017 (CGST Act for short).
1.3 However, if the contract between OEM and component manufacturer was for supply of components made by using the moulds/dies belonging to the component manufacturer, but the same have been supplied by the OEM to the component manufacturer on FOC basis, the amortised cost of such moulds/dies shall be added to the value of the components. In such cases, the OEM will be required to reverse the credit availed on such moulds/ dies, as the same will not be considered to be provided by OEM to the component manufacturer in the course or furtherance of the former's business.
2
How is servicing of cars involving both supply of goods (spare parts) and services (labour), where the value of goods and services are shown separately, to be treated under GST?
2.1 The taxability of supply would have to be determined on a case to case basis looking at the facts and circumstances of each case.
2.2 Where a supply involves supply of both goods and services and the value of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r may also comply with the said provisions.
(b) The principal and the auctioneer for the purpose of auction of tea, coffee, rubber etc., or the principal and the auctioneer for the purpose of supply of tea through a private treaty, are required to maintain the books of accounts relating to each and every place of business in that place itself in terms of the first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 35 of the CGST Act. However, in case difficulties are faced in maintaining the books of accounts, it is clarified that they may maintain the books of accounts relating to the additional place(s) of business at their principal place of business instead of such additional place(s).
(c) The principal and the auctioneer for the purpose of auction of tea, coffee, rubber etc., or the principal and the auctioneer for the purpose of supply of tea through a private treaty, shall intimate their jurisdictional officer in writing about the maintenance of books of accounts relating to the addition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gst rate and credit eligibility

gst rate and credit eligibility
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ramakrishnan Seshadri Dated:- 7-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 7 Replies
GST
Dear Sir,
We kindly request the experts to answer my query.
Our Directors went to hyderabad and stayed in hotel for business purpose. The hotel has charged 18% igst in their bill by mentioning our GSTIN. in tamilnadu.Whether credit is eligible or not and it is correct or not.
Another question is our directors stayed in telengana and do work in andhra pradesh. The telengana hotel has charged 9% cgst and 9% sgst in their invoice. whether it is correct .
Pleae confirm the experts our query
Thanks & Regards,
S.Ramakrishnan
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not correct . CGST and SGST charged by Telegana hotel is correct. However credit of the same is not available to you located in Tamilnadu since such credit can be utilised within the state in which the service provider has gst registration.
Reply By Ramaswamy S:
The Reply:
Endorse the views.
Regards
S.Ramaswamy
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
In case you have branch over there then you may get ITC if you get such bills at your branch offices.
Reply By Praveen Nair:
The Reply:
Dear Experts
As per the Section 12(3), all billing by Hotel (within the taxable territory) is subject to CGST & SGST. What are the cases where hotel can charge IGST?
In view of the above query, from the Hyderabad hotel point of view, will they be asked to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR-1. B2B invoice addition

GSTR-1. B2B invoice addition
Query (Issue) Started By: – Nikhil Oltikar Dated:- 7-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 8-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Can the Total invoice value of the B2B invoice in GSTR-1 be lesser than the taxable value of the invoice?
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
In our view it cannot be.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
I concur with the views of M/s.YAGAY and SUN, Sirs. Total invoice value includes the element of tax also. Moreover, in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RCM on registered GTA

RCM on registered GTA
Query (Issue) Started By: – kaushal jaishwal Dated:- 7-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 8-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear sir/mam
we are a pvt ltd. co. , if a registered GTA providing GTA service and no GST have been charged in bill but it is already registered in GST.
please advise whether the company is still liable under RCM to pay GST on registered GTA' bill if they are not charging GST on thier bill.
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
As per Sl. No. 1 of Notification No. 13/2017=Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 as amended "
Supply of Services by a goods transport agency (GTA) who has not paid central tax at the rate of 6% in respect of transportation

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

LIQUOR LICENSE LEASING AS IMMOVABLE PROPERTY?

LIQUOR LICENSE LEASING AS IMMOVABLE PROPERTY?
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 7-6-2018

Liquor manufacture in India is very complicated with very few cases where brand owner, distiller and bottler are the same entity. Since license for distilleries are highly regulated by the State, brand owners get the liquor manufactured / bottled through on license lease basis which could be either by leasing of the distillery or factory (immovable property) itself or leasing of liquor license. Such liquor licensing is regulated by state excise laws and liquor manufacturing rules as made applicable to the State.
When we talk of renting or leasing services, we find that renting of immovable property is a taxa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

both were leased, i.e. factory premises as well as license of potable liquor and rectified spirits, revenue department wanted that factory leasing and license leasing should not be delinked and sought to tax both as renting of immovable property service, the tribunal (Cestat, Mumbai) ruled in favour of the assessee and against the department.
The appellants were engaged in the business of manufacturing and bottling of alcoholic beverages. The appellants held Potable Liquor License (PLL) and Rectified Sprit License (RSII). The appellants entered into an agreement under which the appellants leased their licenses. The appellants thereafter entered into an agreement for bottling at their plant and recovered bottling charges for the same.
Rev

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

estrictions had been put on the factory, which had been licensed and no charges in the license premises could be made by the licensor without the permission.
It was further held that though license is granted in respect of manufactory but the same is granted to the person. The license given to a person in respect of a manufactory can be transferred to another manufactory on another site in the name of same person. License can be granted even before the manufactory comes into existence. From the Rules it was apparent that license by itself is not a immovable property and therefore leasing of license could not be treated as renting of immovable property service.
It thus concluded that license by itself is not immovable property and therefor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on export of Goods – Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and Clarification in other cases

Refund of IGST on export of Goods – Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and Clarification in other cases
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 24/2018 Dated:- 7-6-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CUSTOM HOUSE: PORT AREA: VISAKHAPATNAM – 530 035
F. No. P3/06/2017-Stats (AM)
Date: 07.06.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 24/2018
Sub : Reg.
Attention of all exporters, customs brokers, members of general trade, and all other stakeholders is invited to refer this office's Public Notice Nos. 09/2018 dated 26.02.2018 and 15/2018 dated 25.03.2018 wherein an alternative mechanism with officer interface to resolve invoice mismatches was provided for the shipping bills filed till 28.02.2018. [Board's Circular

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s.
3. Apart from SB005 errors, IGST refunds are also stuck on account of SB003 error on the customs side. This error occurs when there is a mismatch between GSTIN entity mentioned in the Shipping bill and the one filing GSTR-1/GSTR-3B. Board has examined the issue and it has been decided to provide a correction facility in cases where although GSTIN of both the entities are different but PAN is same. This happens mostly in cases where an entity filing Shipping bill is a registered office and the entity which has paid the IGST is manufacturing unit/other office or vice versa. However, in all such cases, entity claiming refund (one which has filed the Shipping bill) will give an undertaking to the effect that its other office (one which has

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on export of Goods-Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and clarification in other cases

Refund of IGST on export of Goods-Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and clarification in other cases
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 88/2018 Dated:- 7-6-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT)
NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, BALLARD ESTATE,
MUMBAI – 400 001.
F. No. S/26-Misc-05/2018 IGST
Date: 07.06.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 88/2018
Subject: reg.
Attention of the Exporter, Customs Broker and Traders is invited to board's Circular no. 15/2018-Customs issued vide F. No. 450/119/2017-Cus IV dated 6th June 2018.
2. CBIC has issued Circular No's 05/2018-Customs dated 23.02.2018 and 08/2018-Customs dated 23.03.2018 wherein an alternative mechanism with officer interface to resolve invoice mismatches was pro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r on the customs side. This error occurs when there is a mismatch between GSTIN entity mentioned in the Shipping bill and the one filing GSTR-1/GSTR-3B. Board has examined the issue and it has been decided to provide a correction facility in cases where although GSTIN of both the entities are different but PAN is same. This happens mostly in cases where an entity filing Shipping bill is a registered office and the entity which has paid the IGST is manufacturing unit/other office or vice versa. However, in all such cases, entity claiming refund (one which has filed the Shipping bill) will give an undertaking to the effect that its other office (one which has paid IGST) shall not claim any refund or any benefit of the amount of IGST so paid.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Neeraj Jain Versus Union of India

Neeraj Jain Versus Union of India
GST
2018 (11) TMI 707 – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 131 (Cal)
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 7-6-2018
CRM 3328 of 2018
GST
Shivakant Prasad, J.
Mr. Debasish Roy, Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar, Mr. Danish Haque, Mr. Arindam Dey, Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Ms. Aroshi Rathore, Ms. Kriti Mehorotra, for the Petitioner.
Mr. K.K.Maity, for the opposite party.
JUDGMENT
This is an application for bail under Section 439 of CrPC praying for enlarging the accused on bail, who is in jail custody in connection with case under Section 132(1)(a),(b) and (c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sealdah.
Learned Magistrate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Accent Pharma Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Pondicherry

M/s. Accent Pharma Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Pondicherry
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 1498 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 7-6-2018
Appeal No. E/42331/2017 – Final Order No. 41743/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Ms. Yogalakshmi, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Brief facts are that the appellants had availed credit of various input services and Show Cause Notice was issued, proposing to deny the credit availed in respect of certain services. The authorities below have denied credit on a few services and confirmed the demand thereon against which the appellant has filed the present appeal.
2. On beh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r.
4. Heard both sides.
5. The learned Counsel has submitted that though various services have been denied credit, as per the impugned order, they are confining their contest only on the credit only in respect of business development services. The period involved is prior to 01.04.2011 when the definition of input service included the words 'activities relating to business'. The decision relied by the learned Counsel also covers the issue. Hence, I am of the view that the denial of credit on the impugned service is unjustified. It is seen that a consolidated penalty of Rs. 10,000/- has been imposed under Rule 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Since the major credit of business development service, to the tune of Rs. 92,700/-, has be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Indian Additives Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai North

M/s. Indian Additives Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai North
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 1497 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 7-6-2018
Appeal No. E/42301/2017 – Final Order No. 41744/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Shri V.S. Manoj, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Brief facts are that appellants were issued Show Cause Notice, proposing to recover the wrongly availed credit to the tune of Rs. 09,52,385/- for the period 2010-11 to 2014-15. After due process of law, the original authority dropped the demand in respect of certain services and an amount of Rs. 1,76,586/- along with interest was co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t there is no interest liability or penalties. He relied upon the decision in the case of Strategic Engineering Pvt. Ltd., (2014) 310 ELT 509 Madras, as well as the decision passed by the Tribunal in the case of Easun Rerolle Ltd. vide final order No. 42202/2016 dated 04.11.2016.
3. The learned AR, Shri R. Subramaniyan, supported the findings in the impugned order.
4. Heard both sides.
5. It is brought out from the records that the appellant has reversed a substantial portion of the irregularly availed credit to the tune of Rs. 1,70,290/- along with interest before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice. A small differential amount of Rs. 6,296/- was also reversed by them after passing of the order in original. It is also brought out that

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Southern Agro Implements Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai North

M/s. Southern Agro Implements Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai North
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 1496 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 7-6-2018
Appeal No. E/42636/2017 – Final Order No. 41745/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Shri G. Mani, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Brief facts are that the appellants are manufacturers of Condenser and Vacuum System and are availing the facility of service tax paid on input services. It was noticed by the Department that for the period February, 2011 to October, 2015, they had filed Cenvat Credit on cleaning/housekeeping services which, according to t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

well cover the said services and that these services are related to the manufacturing activity. He relied upon the decision of Tribunal in the case of Sai life Sciences Ltd. Vs. CCE, Cus. & S.T., Hyderabad-IV, 2017 (51) S.T.R. 55 (Tri. – Hyd.) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. CCE Visakhapatnam-I, 2017 (47) S.T.R. 33 (Tri.- Hyd.).
3. The learned AR, Shri R. Subramaniyan, supported the findings in the impugned order. He relied upon the decision in the case of M/s. Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. CCE, Delhi [2009 (240) E.L.T. 641 (SC)]
4. Heard both sides
5. It is brought out from the records that the appellant has availed the impugned services for the purpose of cleaning the equipment/machinery used in the manufacturing activity. Furthe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST- REFUND- Constitution of Refund facilitation Cell in GST Facilitation Centers at District and State Head Quarters

GST- REFUND- Constitution of Refund facilitation Cell in GST Facilitation Centers at District and State Head Quarters
26-CT-2697/2018 C1 Dated:- 7-6-2018 Kerala SGST
GST – States
PROCEEDINGS OF THE Prl SECRETARY & COMMISSIONER,
STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
(Present: Dr. Rajan N Khobragade IAS)
Sub:- GST- REFUND- Constitution of Refund facilitation Cell in GST Facilitation Centers at District and State Head Quarters- reg:-
Goods and Service Tax is launched on 1st July 2017. The law envisaged prompt refund mechanism. GSTN is developing online processing of refund application mechanism. Till complete online system is operational, manual system is operationalized.
GST being a major tax reform in indirect taxation syste

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under District Deputy Commissioner.
II. The district Deputy Commissioner shall identify officers in the rank of State Tax Officer / State Tax Inspector to function in the Cell. (Ensure adequate number of officers in major districts where refund cases are more)
III. It shall be embedded in the district GST Facilitation Centres (Tax Corners).
2. As a corollary, a State Refund Facilitation Cell shall be formed at the State head quarters to assist the District Refund Cell and for clarification on any matter which are required from the Commissionerate.
3. Sri. Mansur M I Asst. Commissioner (Internal Audit) and Sri.B.S. Haridas, Asst. Commissioner, O/o CST are nominated in the State Refund Cell.
4. The functions of the District Refund Facil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

direction of Deputy Commissioner, facilitate meetings with exporters and other trade organizations.
VII. State RFC will coordinate with District RFCs and collate all the data in Form I, II and III properly.
VIII. State RFC shall put up a monthly report for reviewing and taking various actions.
5. The Deputy Commissioners shall give wide publicity to this arrangement to the trade organizations and officers.
The detailed guidelines in the form of Standard Operation Procedures (SOP) are uploaded in the website www.keralataxes.gov.in for reference and follow up.
A schematic process flow for the dealer seeking refund is attached for information.
Rajan
Prl Secretary & Commissioner
Circular, Trade Notice, Public Notice, Instructionsor O

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reena Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Versus Kerala Water Authoirty

Reena Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Versus Kerala Water Authoirty
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1824 – KERLA HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 16 (Ker.)
KERLA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 7-6-2018
WP(C). No. 13630 of 2018
GST
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.
Petitioner: BY ADVS.SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.ARUN THOMAS SRI.JENNIS STEPHEN SRI.ALPHIN ANTONY SRI.VIJAY V. PAUL SMT.KARTHIKA MARIA SMT.MARIA ROY
RESPONDENT: R1 TO R3 BY SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
JUDGMENT
These two writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner, which is stated to be a Private Limited Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner says that they are registered Class-A contractor who have been undertaking various works at the requisition of the Kerala Water Authority and such other Public and Private Limited undertakings.
2. The controversy in these cases relates to certain specified works already undertaken by the petitioner and the work orders have b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

me Tax at the rate of 2.266% and Labour Workers' Welfare Fund of 1%. According to them, when the work was being executed by them, the GST regime was implemented, as per which, the contractors were obligated to pay tax at the rate of 18% instead of 4.04% VAT. The petitioner asserts that, as per clause 8.15 of the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT), the Water Authority had agreed that any excess in taxes and duties within contract period will be borne by the said Authority.
4. The pleadings and the materials available on record show that, in fact, these assertions are virtually admitted by the Kerala Water Authority and as is clear from a circular issued by the Water Authority, dated 10.08.2017, a copy of which has been placed on record as Ext.P5 in both these writ petitions, the Water Authority clarified that “the difference between GST paid and the sum of all the taxes subsumed under GST applicable at the time of bidding shall be absorbed by Kerala Water Authority on production of payme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ying with the stipulations in Ext.P5 circular, is that the concerned officer is awaiting directions from the Head Office. He points out that there is no other reason stated in the counter affidavit and according to him, this stand of the respondents, that they are awaiting permission from the Head Office, is completely untenable, since Ext.P5 circular has been issued by the Head Office, which is to say, the Managing Director of the Kerala Water Authority.
8. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents answers the submission of the petitioner by saying that though the payments are to be made by the Deputy Chief Engineer, Central Region of the Kerala Water Authority, he is not authorised to do so without the sanction and permission of the Head office, with respect to the amounts relating to the GST.
According to him, this is the reason why the bills of the petitioner were forwarded to the Head Office and that until and unless directions are received from the said office,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not completed the works in question satisfactorily, it would not be reasonable on their part to keep these claims pending ad infinitum. I am certainly of the view that a decision on this regard has to be taken by the competent Authority imperatively and without any further delay.
11. In the result, I order these writ petitions directing the first respondent – Managing Director of the Kerala Water Authority to immediately take up Exts.P6 to P8 representations of the petitioner produced in W.P.(C) No.13676 of 2018 and Exts.P6 to P9 produced in W.P.(C) No.13630 of 2018 and to issue orders on the same, adverting specifically to the terms of circular No.GST/002/17, dated 10.08.2018, issued by the said Authority, as expeditiously as possible but not later than one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
If the first respondent finds that the amounts are due to the petitioner, in terms of the directions in the afore-mentioned circular, then the said Authority shall ensur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Capita India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West

Capita India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West
Service Tax
2018 (6) TMI 667 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 7-6-2018
Appeal Nos. ST/85468, 85531, 85746, 85747, 85749/2018 – Order No. A/86708-86712/2018
Service Tax
 Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member ( Judicial )
Shri Prasad Paranjape, Advocate, for appellant
Shri Dilip Shinde, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for respondent
ORDER
These appeals are directed against Orders in appeal passed by the Commissioner(Appeals) whereby Ld. Commissioner(Appeals) upheld the rejection of refund claim amounting to Rs. 43,45,951/- for the period from April, 2013 to September, 2015. The said refund claim was filed by the appellant under Rule 5 read with Notification No. 27/12- CE(N.T.) dated 18-06-2012, the grounds for rejection of refund claim are as under:
Sr No
Particulars/reasons for disallowance
Amount(Rs.)
1
Service do not qualify as “input service”- absence of these services will have no adve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

en held that the apartment/ premises in respect of which consulting services have been aid to Urban Link Consulting Pvt Ltd is not incorporated ST/85468,85531,85746,85747,85749/2 3 018 in the ST 2 certificate of the appellant. Accordingly, the appellant is not entitled to refund of credit on the same(Rs. 1,100).
(iv) The learned Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the contention of the appellant that while computation of refund under Rule 5 of the CCR read with Notification No. 27/2012, refund should be computed by applying the export ratio on 'total cenvat credit availed” for the period instead of “unutilised cenvat credit” remaining at the end of the period(Rs. 33,887)
(v) It is inter alia held on scrutiny of the invoices it is clear that customs house agent service is availed for debonding and not procurement of imported goods as claimed by the appellant used in providing output service(Rs. 22,857).
2. Being aggrieved by the said order, appellant filed present appeal.
3. Shri

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ale of diesel, he submits that vendor is providing power back up service to the appellant by means of diesel Generator set in the premises of the appellant. These services are for uninterrupted power supply. The charges of the same was cost of such operating expenses including the cost of diesel reimbursed by the appellant therefore even though the cost of diesel is reimbursed services provided is operating diesel set for uninterrupted supply of power, it cannot be said that appellant made payment against sale of the goods.
4. As regard the charge of sale of text article, he submits that service have been availed for preparation of various study material used for purpose of training, needs for the employee, appellant has not purchased any goods. In this regard, he placed reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble Delhi High court in case of VPSSR Facilities Vs Commissioner of Value added &Anr reported in [2017 99 VST 1].
5. As regard the objection on erection, commission and installation se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ts:
(a) Commissioner of C. Ex. &ST NoidaVs Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd [2017(52) S.T.R. 497 (Tri. All)] ST/85468,85531,85746,85747,85749/2 6 018 affirmed in Commissioner Vs. Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd [2017(52) S.T.R. J 253(All)]
(b) Deepak Fertilizer & Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd Vs CCE[2013(32) S.TR. 532(Bom)]
(c) M portal India Wireless Solutions P. Ltd Vs. C.S.T. [2012(27)S.T.R. 134(Kar)]
7. As regard the dispute on the formula provided under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 he submits that Ld. Commissioner has failed to correctly apply the formula for computation of refund for the period April, 2013 to September, 2013 inasmuch as he contended that unutilised Cenvat credit remaining at the end of the period should be taken as total Cenvat credit availed. He submits that as per Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 “net cenvat credit” defined, according to which total Cenvat credit availed during the period should be taken as net cenvat credit and not unutilised cenvat credi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tes the findings of the impugned order.
9. I find that major amount of refund was rejected on the ground that services do not qualify as input service or same falls under exclusion category. In this regard, I would like to go through nature of service and use thereof which are reproduced below as submitted by appellant;
(i) Works Contract Services- Disputed amount Rs. 25,24,004
These services are procured in relation to the modernisation, renovation and repairs of the premises/office equipment of the appellant. Accordingly, these services are used in relation to the output services provided by the Company. The said services are not covered under the exclusion clause of the definition of “input service” as provided under Rule 2(l) of the Credit Rules. The detailed submission in regard is made in subsequent paragraphs
(ii) Renting of Immovableproperty service.
These services are availed in relation to the renting of the business premises from where the company operates its bu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed with respect to the installation/ re-erection of office units of the Appellant and other office equipment used at the business premises from where the output services are provided. These units/ equipment are used on a day-to-day basis in provision of output services. Accordingly, these services are essential to keep the assets in good condition without which the output services cannot be rendered. Therefore, maintenance and repair, installation and re-erectioning services are essential in provision of output services by the Appellant. The specimen copies of the invoices are attached at page no. 30-31 of the compilation.
(iv) Management maintenance and re * air services – The Appellant requires these services for regular various maintenance of electrical equipment/ computers/ servers, Air Conditioners, DG Sets and other asset s used in the business premises. These services are essential to keep the assets in good condition without which the outputs be rendered. Therefore, maintena

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

credit is sought to be denied have been incurred during the provision of services provided by the vendor. Further, as per Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, all the expenditure or costs incurred by the service provider in the course of providing taxable service shall be treated as consideration for the taxable service and included in the value for the purpose of charging service tax.
Given the same, it is pertinent to note that the said expenses are part of the provision of the main service provide by the vendor and tax is charged on the same as per the above rule. Accordingly, these services are used only in relation to the output services provided by the Appellant and hence the credit cannot be denied on the same.
(vi) Outdoor catering services –
These services have been availed by the Appellant in relation to catering facility provided to its employees. Further, it is pertinent to note that the Appellant being a business process outsourcing unit,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion to official work. Accordingly, these services are used in relation to the output services provided by the Appellant.
(viii) Sponsorship Services –
The said service is availed by the Appellant towards participation of specific employees in certain business conventions/ conferences to represent the Appellant. As per the prescribed procedure, the Appellant has discharged the service tax on the same under reverse charge basis and availed credit of the same. Accordingly, the said services are towards the business of the Appellant and the credit cannot be denied on the same. architect Services – These services have been availed in relation to sketching, specification and drawing plans of different modernisation and renovation works done at the business premises of the Appellant. Accordingly, these services are required for provision of output services provided by the company. The specimen invoice copies are attached at page no. 50 of the compilation.
(x) Business Support Service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s.
(xi)Public relations management services
The said services have been availed by the Appellant in relation to various strategic counselling for the industry, media and perception research etc. The Appellant requires the said services for the purpose of analysing the market position and financial public relation. Accordingly, the said services are essential requirement of the Appellant to maintain its market value and used for the provision of services rendered.
(xii) Customs House Agent Services – disputed amount Rs. 22,857
The said services have been availed in relation to procurement of imported equipment which are used for provision of output services exported. The said equipment are primarily the I. T. equipment which is used in the provision of the output services by the Appellant. Accordingly, custom house agent's services are essential for procurement of I.T. equipment used in providing output services.
(xiii) Commercial training and coaching services – disp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

an organized and systematic manner which are necessary for smooth running of the business of the Appellant. As prescribed, the Appellant has discharged the service tax on such legal consultancy service as a recipient of service under reverse charge mechanism and hence is entitled to avail t same he credit of the
(xvi) Banking and Other Financial Services- disputed amount Rs. 8 738
The Appellant has availed these services in relation to purchase of foreign currency to be used by its employees during their official overseas visits for providing the output services. Accordingly, these services are used in relation to the provision of output services of the Appellant and hence have a direct nexus to the services exported by the Appellant. The specimen invoice copies are attached at page no. 37 to 46 of the compilation.
(xvii) Business Auxiliary Services- disputed amount Rs. 8,737
These service are availed in relation to renting charges for DG Sets in the business premises of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(xviii) Video Tape Production Agency Services-
The said services have been availed by the company in relation to video recording of certain events during the business meetings, seminars etc. of the company. Accordingly, these services are used in relation to the output services provided by the Appellant.
(xix) Technical Inspection and Certification Services
These services have been procured for inspection and testing of earthing wiring of the business premises. The said services are essential to maintain the proper working condition of various equipments used by the employees. Accordingly, these services are essentially required and used in relation to the output services provided by the Appellant.
(xx) Photography services-
The said services have been rendered by the vendor during the business events organised by the company in relation to photography services so that the important moments of the events can be captured for further reference and business promotion. Accor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

inting of the same. The said posters are displayed in various events for the purpose of business promotion and advertisement of the appellant's business. Promotion of business is an important requirement of the appellant. Accordingly, the said services are essential and used in relation to the out put services provided by the appellant.
10. From the nature of the services and use thereof as reproduced above, I find that all the services are essential services used for providing output service therefore refund in respect of cenvat credit on aforesaid services cannot be denied on the ground of nexus.
11. As regard the charge of exclusion of the service from the definition of input service under Rule 2(l), I find that except 'works contract service' all other services are falling under inclusion category. As regard the works contract service, it is in the nature of repair, maintenance and renovation of existing building of the service provider therefore same is not excluded from the am

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vice tax on such charges. In case of transaction alleged to have made as sale of text article, I find that this payment is towards preparation of various study material used for purpose of training needs of the employee which are required to provide out put service of the appellant. Therefore credit in respect of services or preparation of study material is admissible.
14. As regard erection, commission and installation, Ld. Commissioner denied the refund on the ground that service cannot be identified form the invoices, I find that appellant had explained to the ld. Commissioner(Appeals) that these services were availed in relation to installation/re-erection of the office unit of the appellant and other office equipment used at the business premises. Description mentioned in the invoice i.e. labour charges per spot service is related to labour work done for installation /re-erection of office. In this fact it is clear that service is input service and clearly identifiable hence ther

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendments to Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 – Extension to Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) and compensation Cess exemption under EOU scheme till 01.10.2018 — regd.

Amendments to Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 – Extension to Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) and compensation Cess exemption under EOU scheme till 01.10.2018 — regd.
10/2015-2020 Dated:- 7-6-2018 Foreign Trade Policy
DGFT
Foreign Trade Policy
FTP
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NOTIFICATION No. 10/2015-2020
NEW DELHI, DATED THE 7th June, 2018
Subject: Amendments to Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 Extension to Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) and compensation Cess exemption under EOU scheme till 01.10.2018 – regd.
S.O(E) – In exercise of powers conferred by Section 5 of FT(D&R) Act, 1992, read with Paragraph 1.02 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20, as amended from

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Rate Clarified for Priority Sector Lending and Renewable Energy Certificates; Ensures Compliance and Uniform Taxation.

GST Rate Clarified for Priority Sector Lending and Renewable Energy Certificates; Ensures Compliance and Uniform Taxation.
Circulars
GST
Applicable GST rate on Priority Sector Lending Certifi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Deadline Extended for IGST Refund Claims on Exported Goods via SB005 Alternate Mechanism: New Procedures Clarified for Exporters.

Deadline Extended for IGST Refund Claims on Exported Goods via SB005 Alternate Mechanism: New Procedures Clarified for Exporters.
Circulars
Customs
Refund of IGST on export of Goods-Extension

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exposition on E-way Bill Rules (Question-Answer format)

Exposition on E-way Bill Rules (Question-Answer format)
By: – Amrit Mohanty
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 6-6-2018

With the advent of the E-Way Bill Rules and provisions under the GST laws, the following article has been prepared to provide a substantive understanding of the law surrounding E-way Bills.
Firstly we would discuss in a point-wise manner the law surrounding e-way bills and its requirements. The following may please be noted:
* E-way Bill is not fundamentally a GST document. Applicability of GST law is in no way based upon the practice of E-way bills and neither is the charge of GST in any manner linked to e-way bill rules and provisions. Therefore beginning from the very precipice down to the intricate details, we must refrain from drawing any inferences from the general laws and principles of GST while interpreting the provisions of E-way Bills or while carrying out the practice of e-way bills no matter how so logically intuitive they may seem.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the said person in charge shall be liable to produce the documents and devices and also allow the inspection of the goods.
* Under section 68 of the CGST Act, 2017 the E-way Rules have been notified under Chapter-XVI of the CGST Rules, 2017.
* Under the said rules, there are two broad based directions:
* Rule 138 : Furnish the specified Information in the online portal about the movement of goods and generate an e-way bill.
* Rule 138A : Person in charge of the conveyance shall carry the above generated e-way bill/ e-way bill number in electronic form/ e-way bill number mapped to a RFID embedded unto the conveyance.
* First we shall go into the specifics of the first direction i.e furnishing of specified information in the online portal about the movement of goods and generate an e-way bill. The specifics are furnished below in a question answer format (along with the exceptions) for easy understanding of the reader. Also for better understanding we would suggest the reader t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

clauses (i) and (ii) of section 24 i.e person making inter-state supply and person liable to pay tax under reverse charge respectively.
Who is required to furnish the information about the movement of the goods?
Every registered person who causes the movement of goods
in relation to supply
for reasons other than supply
due to inward supply from unregistered person.
Therefore the supplier or the recipient of goods, who so ever is registered and causes the movement of goods shall furnish the information. Further if neither of them do so, the transporter may also (also see Q.9 and Q.10) on authorization received from the registered person furnish the information.
Furthermore e-commerce operator (amazon, flipkart etc) may also furnish information if goods are supplied through it.
Where and in what form does this aforesaid information need to be furnished?
The information is needed to be furnished in Part A of Form GST EWB-01 electronically on the common portal.
What ar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ice is issued in respect of both exempt and taxable supply of goods.
Is E-way bill required in case a consignor/consignee is transporting goods other than through a transporter?
Yes, Where the goods are transported by the registered person as a consignor or the recipient of supply as the consignee, whether in his own conveyance or a hired one or a public conveyance, by road, the said person shall be required to generate the e-way bill by the standard usual process.
With reference to Q.8, what shall be the case where the goods are handed over to the transporter for transportation by road?
The registered person shall furnish the information relating to the transporter on the common portal.
Moreover as mentioned in Q.3 the transporter (on authorization received from the registered person) may also furnish the information on the common portal in Part A of form GST EWB-01 and continue with the process of generation of e-way bill.
10. With reference to Q.3 and Q.8 and Q.9, what

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f them who is causing the movement of goods or the transporter, may at their option, furnish information and generate e-way bill.
What follows after the information is furnished in Part-A of form GST EWB-01 and the unique number is generated?
With reference to Q. 6, After the information is furnished in Part-A of form GST EWB-01 and the unique number is generated, the registered supplier or recipient or the transporter, as the case may be, shall furnish the details of Vehicle (i.e Vehicle number for road) using the unique number in Part-B of form GST EWB-01 after which an E-way bill shall be generated in the portal itself and only after generation of the E-way bill with the furnishing of info in Part-B of form GST EWB-01, will it be valid for movement of goods by road.
Further upon generation of e-way bill on the common portal, a unique e-way bill number (EBN) shall be made available to the supplier, the recipient and the transporter on the common portal.
Is there any exemption

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST EWB-01.
Are there any exceptions to the above rules in case where the goods are transported by railways, or by air or vessel?
Where the goods are transported by railways or by air or vessel, the e-way bill shall be generated by the registered person, being the supplier or the recipient, who shall, either before or after the commencement of movement, furnish, on the common portal, the information in Part-B of Form GST EWB-01.
Further where the goods are transported by railways, the railways shall not deliver the goods unless the e-way bill required under these rules is produced at the time of delivery.
What procedure is required to be followed wherein multiple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance?
In such cases, multiple e-way bills are required to be generated for each such consignment. The transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

can be cancelled electronically on the common portal within twenty four hours of generation of e-way bill. However if it has been verified in transit, it cannot be cancelled.
What shall be the validity period of an E-way bill or a consolidate E-way bill?
The E-way bill's validity period is determined based on the distance it is required to travel. The following table shows the distance upto which the conveyance needs to travel within the respective time from the relevant date so as to keep the E-way bill validated and on failure of which the e-way bill shall be invalidated and a fresh e-way bill will then have to be generated:
Sl. No.
*
Validity Period
*
*
Upto 100 km
One day in cases other than over dimensional cargo
For every 100 km. Or part thereof thereafter
One additional day in cases other than over dimensional cargo
Upto 20km
One day in case of over dimensional cargo
For every 20 km. Or part thereof thereafter
One additional day in cases of over dimension

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

here the goods being transported are specified in Annexure-1;
(b) where the goods are being transported by a non-motorised conveyance;
(c) where the goods are being transported from the customs port, airport, air cargo complex and land customs station to an inland container depot or a container freight station for clearance by Customs;
(d) in respect of movement of goods within such areas as are notified under clause (d) of sub-rule (14) of rule 138 of the State or Union territory Goods and Services Tax Rules in that particular State or Union territory;
(e) where the goods, other than de-oiled cake, being transported, are specified in the Schedule appended to notification No. 2/2017- Central tax (Rate)
(f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel;
(g) where the supply of goods being transported is treated as no supply under S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onsignor to a weighbridge for weighment or from the weighbridge back to the place of the business of the said consignor subject to the condition that the movement of goods is accompanied by a delivery challan issued in accordance with rule 55.
Annexure-1
The list of goods for (a) under Q.20
Sl. No.
Description of goods
*
*
Liquefied petroleum gas for supply to household and non domestic exempted category (NDEC) customers
Kerosene oil sold under PDS
Postal baggage transported by Department of Posts
Natural or cultured pearls and precious or semi-precious stones; precious metals and metals clad with precious metal
(Chapter 71)
Jewellery, goldsmiths' and silversmiths' wares and other
articles (Chapter 71)
Currency
Used personal and household effects
Coral, unworked (0508) and worked coral (9601)
* The above 20 Question were relating to the first direction as mentioned in page 2 last para. Moving to second broad direction the following questions have been answered:

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ploaded in Form GST INV-1, the information in Part-A of form GST EWB-01 shall be auto populated by the common portal on the basis information furnished in Form GST INV-1.
What is the portal web address for the above purposes of generating E way bills?
www.ewaybillgst.gov.in
The above are the central provisions surrounding the law and practice of E-way Bills.
Given the standard practice prevalent in varied industries which are not homogenous, the processes and procedures of each organisation need to be optimized around the above provisions so as to result in most efficient compliance of E-way bill provisions.
Further we must acknowledge the fact thatcertain ambiguities and apprehensions still persists which may be due to varied interpretations and insufficienciesof the statute which may lead the reader into resorting to best possible assumptions in the given scenario and the material provided above may not be free from the same. All ambiguities and doubts would eventually be remo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: R. VIDYASAGAR RAO CONSTRUCTIONS

IN RE: R. VIDYASAGAR RAO CONSTRUCTIONS
GST
2019 (1) TMI 1367 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, HYDERABAD TELANGANA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 482 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, HYDERABAD TELANGANA – AAR
Dated:- 6-6-2018
A. R. Com/9/2018
GST
S/Shri V. Srinivas, Member (Central Tax) And J. Lakshminarayana, Member (State Tax)
ORDER
M/s. R. Vidyasagar Rao Constructions, Plot No. 98 & 99, Lumbini layout, near Euro School, Gachibowli, Hyderabad-36 (GSTIN No. 36AAGFR6627L12Q) has filed an application in Form GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 103 of CGST/TGST Rules, 2017 and sought advance ruling on the following issues:
* The combination of services of excavation of sand including loading with machinery at reach, formation of Ramps and maintenance of Roads, transportation charges for the tractors/ tippers of sand from reach to stockyard and loading cost of sand from stockyard to lorries, is whether “Works Contract” or “Comp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e
* formation of ramps, roads and their maintenance
(b) The place where the above contract is being executed in all its respects is in fact related to the Kaleshwaram project when it comes into existence, the sand existing there would hit the flow/ storage of water when the object of the project is sought to be achieved and therefore it is the reason for removal of sand there from. The State of Telangana sought to remove the sand and it is to be done through contractors. Such sand being a mineral when removed, the role of TSMDC came into existence and hence the contractual obligation between TSMDC and the applicant originated.
(c) The important feature of above contract is formation of ramps and roads in which there is supply of goods involved which owned by the applicant at the time of their supply which are bought by the applicant in the local market by paying required royalty, taxes etc. by theory of accretion. When the said goods like, morrum, metal and pipes etc. are incorpora

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ties they are rendering to the contractee amounts to composite services in which the transportation part is predominant and therefore also the rate would be 5% GST (2.5% CGST+2.5% SGST).
4. The applicant submitted copy of the Contract Agreement No. 08-TSMDC/Damerakunta-III/Annaram.Sand/Legal/2017, dated 18th March, 2017 entered between Telangana State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd., a Company registered under Companies Act, 2013 and M/s. VidyaSagar Rao Constructions (i.e. the applicant).
I. Opinion expressed by the member representing Central Tax:
1. A perusal of the said Agreement dated 18-3-2017 entered between Telangana State Mineral Development Corporation Limited, a Registered Company under the Companies Act, 2013 (TSMDC for brevity) and M/s. R. VidyaSagar Rao Construction, a registered partnership firm dealing with mining business and having its place of business at Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad (contractor/applicant for brevity), we find that TSMDC had accepted the tender

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ation of sand;
(ii) transportation of the excavated sand from the submergence area to the identified stockyard and
(iii) loading of the sand into lorries at the stockyard.
(b) The contractor receives an amount of Rs. 74.36 per CBM of sand for the above said three activities mentioned at (i) to (in) above. It is the look out of the contractor to transport the excavated sand by laying the roads/ ramps wherever it is required from the submergence area to the identified stockyard and laying of road/ramps is out of the scope of the contract as specified in the subject agreement. Hence the service rendered by the applicant do not encumber the works related to roads/ramps as claimed by the applicant.
(c) The contractor should have under their possession through ownership or lease, equipment such as Excavators, Mobile water tanks, Tractors/ Tippers throughout the contract period.
(d) The contractor shall obtain all necessary licences, permits, approvals, etc., before commencement of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

enable.
3. The service supplied by the applicant is a 'composite supply'. As per Clause (30) of Section 2 of the CGST Act, 'Composite supply' is defined as:
“composite supply” means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply”;
The three components of the services:
(i) excavation of sand;
(ii) transportation of the excavated sand from the submergence area to the identified stockyard and
(iii) loading of the sand into lorries at the stockyard,
as mentioned above are naturally bundled and the principal supply is 'excavation of sand'. Without excavation of sand, transportation and loading of sand to the lorries doesn't arise. The services of transportation of sand and loading of sand to the lorries are ancilla

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-Centra1 Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 is extracted hereunder for ready reference:
Sl. No.
Chapter, Section or Heading
Description of Service
Rate (per cent.)
Condition
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
9
Heading 9965 (Goods Transport services)
(i) Transport of goods by rail [other than services specified at item no. (iv)]
2.5
Provided that credit of input tax charged in respect of goods in supplying the service is not utilised for paying central tax or integrated tax on the supply of the service
(ii) Transport of goods in a vessel.
2.5
Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods (other than on ships, vessels including bulk carriers and tankers) used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)]
(iii) Services of goods transport agency (GTA) in relation to transportation of goods (including used household goods for personal use).
Explanation. – “goods transport agency” means any person who provides service in relation to transport of good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

med by the applicant. The word 'vessel' has been defined under clause (z) of Section 2 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 and the same is extracted here under:
“(z) “vessel” includes anything made for the conveyance, mainly by water, of human beings or of goods and a caisson”
As per Section 2(34) of the CGST Act, 2017 “Conveyance” includes a vessel, an aircraft and a vehicle. Hence the words “Transport of goods in a vessel” as Specified at (ii) under column (3) against Sl. No. 9 of the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 mainly refers to the mode of transport, and the word “vessel” cannot be considered as a “container” as argued by the applicant.
7. In terms of the above statutory provision, vessel includes all types of transport conveyances by water like ships, barges, boats, tankers, etc. But the case on hand is distinguishable as the vehicles used for transportation of the sand is by road and therefore the same are not covered under 'vessel'

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

plicant:
Tender Document Reference: TSMDC/SAND/EXC/Damerakunta-III/Annaram/2016, dated 29-12-2016
Excavation of Sand 560000CBM of Block III, Damerakunta-III over an extent of 52.0 Ha from Submergence area of Annaram Barrege, Kaleswaram Project and transport the same to the nearby Stockyard and again loading of the same into the Lorries at Stockyard…………. Page 1.
The Corporation upset price is Rs. 100/per CBM (Rs.30 for loading charges for machinery at Reach, Rs. 7.50 for formation of Ramps and maintenance of Roads, Rs. 32.50 for transportation charges for the tractors/ tippers of sand from reach to stockyard and Rs. 30 for loading cost of sand from Stockyard to lorries…… Page 8.
At the cost of repetition, the upset price ratios are drawn hereunder as per the above tender document:
Loading charges for machinery at reach: 30%
Formation of ramps, formation and maintenance of roads: 7.50%
Charges for transportation of sand through tractors/tippers from reach to stockyard

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mmunicated by the contractee.
In view of the above terms of tender called for which was fructified into an agreement between TSNMDC and the applicant since the applicant quoted the lowest bid and hence was successful in the bid and need to execute this contract.
Understanding by the applicant: about the nature of contract and rate of tax there on :
1. Firstly as per the information/ details provided along the application for ruling and also written submissions filed at the time of hearing the case, the applicant opines this contract is a works contract falling under Section 2(119) and hence when it is being done to Government connected to Kalaeswaam Projected and hence liable to CST @ 2.5% CGST and 2.5% SGST as per the Notification No. 31/2017, dated 13-10-2017, vide G.O.Ms No. 253, Revenue (CT-II) Department, dated 23-11-2017 the portion of which is as under:
Heading
Description of Service
Rate (percent.)
Condition
9954
(vii) Composite supply of works contract as defined in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

port of goods by rail [other than services specified at item no. (iv)].
2.5
Provided that credit of input tax charged in respect of goods in supplying the service is not utilised for paying central tax or integrated tax on the supply of the service
(ii) Transport of goods in a vessel.
2.5
Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods (other than on ships, vessels including bulk carriers and tankers) used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)]
(iii) Services of goods transport agency (GTA) in relation to transportation of goods (including used household goods for personal use).
Explanation. – “goods transport agency” means any person who provides service in relation to transport of goods by road and issues consignment note, by whatever name called.
2.5
Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)]
(iv) Transport of goods in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ervices joined together' in the event of which the transaction between the provider and the receiver is in the nature of a 'Composite supply' under the scheme of the Act.
4. Though in the letter of intent and in the Agreement it is referred that the price is for one CBM of work done such work is not just simple as 'excavation' i.e. culling out sand form the nature and placing the excavated movable goods viz. sand nearby the source wherefrom it is excavated. The pre and post excavation activities joined among them in fact could be gathered from the tender document/agreement as per which the following are they:
1. Rs. 30 for loading charges for machinery at Reach,
2. Rs. 7.50 for formation of Ramps and maintenance of Roads,
3. Rs. 32.50 for transportation charges for the tractors/ tippers of sand from reach to stockyard
4. Rs. 30 for loading cost of sand from Stockyard to lorries = Summed up to Rs. 100/- CBM of work done.
5. As a matter of fact out of Rs. 100/-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(119) of the Act. Such WCT is antecedent to the work of excavation and loading. Therefore, formations of ramps, roads i.e. internal roads before excavating the sand and loading can be said to be a Works contract in which certain goods are embedded to earth permanently amounting to immovable property. Therefore, the so formed roads and ramps in the submergible area after the Kaleswaram project comes into existence to facilitate the transportation of sand.
8. In the above activity, the construction of ramps and roads and their maintenance falls under WCT.
9. The next one is supply of transportation service i.e. from reach i.e. source wherefrom the sand culled out and loaded and to the place of stockyard.
10. Then the service of loading the sand from stockyard to lorries of 3rd parties starts.
11. Last service is formation of the road from the stockyard to the nearest village road and its maintenance till the entire contract is over. To form these roads, the provider needs to use good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ysis, the request of the applicant in his written statement and as per his argument at the time of hearing the case that the entire contract is WCT is not tenable since the intention between the recipient and the provider is not to see the emergence of an immovable property i.e. ramps and roads either internal or external whatsoever but the intention is to see that the sand stagnated at one place be shifted to other place by means of transportation of the sand. So that laying the ramps and roads came into picture but not shifting the sand from one place to other brought such ramps and roads into picture, if the entire contractual obligations are overviewed.
15. In view of the above factual matrix, the above contract is a composite contract but not exclusively works contract service as defined under Section 2(119) and as per paragraph No. 6(a) of Schedule II to the Act.
16. Since the above contract is held to be composite contract, the request of the applicant what is the rate of tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

en above is one for the same amongst the worldly.
20. Whether supplies more than one in the ordinary course of business a matter to be gathered from the facts and circumstances of each case depend on the business line of activity and for that matter there is no and can't be a thumb rule/no straight jacket formula. Same as the case in the case of 'naturally bundled together'. Thus each case is to be examined in the back drop of several factors.
21. In the instant case the recipient for whatever may be the reasons, instead of engaging different providers for different supplies engaged one supplier for all the supplies referred to above in detail. This fact only making the instant contract a composite one. In the facts of this case, laying internal ramps and roads excavation of sand, loading to containers, transportation of sand, unloading, stacking, loading to 3rd party containers, making ready the external roads and their maintenance for free flow of transportation of integrally c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the above Section and keeping in view of the above facts and circumstances of the case of the appellant the principle supply in this composite supply is identified as 'transportation of goods'.
26. As per Notification No. 11/2017, dated 28-06-2017 the following are the tax rates for rendering the above service.
27. The Sl. No. 9 of the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 is extracted hereunder for ready reference:
Sl. No.
Chapter, Section or Heading
Description of Service
Rate (percent.)
Condition
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
9
Heading 9965 (Goods transport services)
(i) Transport of goods by rail [other than services specified at item no. (iv)].
2.5
Provided that credit of input tax charged in respect of goods in supplying the service is not utilised for paying central tax or integrated tax on the supply of the service
(ii) Transport of goods in a vessel.
2.5
Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods (other than on ships, vessels

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or 18% under residuary entry.
30. The applicant stated in the application for ruling and also in his written submissions his contract is not works contract, it is transportation of goods by vessel.
31. The meaning of 'vessel' is not defined under the Act.
32. As per the condition in column 5 in respect of 'Transportation of goods by vessel' the position of input tax credit is as under:
'Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods (other than on ships, vessels including bulk carriers and tankers) used in supplying the service has not been taken.
33. Therefore, the meaning of 'vessel' can be ascertained from the above proviso to the enumeration of 'Transportation of goods by vessel' and when it is done so, vessel include bulk carriers and tankers any goods used for transportation of other goods. Thus the meaning of vessel for the purpose of this entry stands as container which contains other goods which carries the goods from one place to othe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Customs – Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems – certain guidelines

Customs – Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems – certain guidelines
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs Dated:- 6-6-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTNIVE)
55-17-3, C-14, 2nd Floor, Road No.2 Industrial Estate, Autonagar, Vijayawada – 520007
Phone: 0866-2551261 Fax: 0866-2551156
C. No. VIII/09/01/2017-Cus.Tech (PF-I)
Date: 06.06.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs
Subject : Regarding.
*****
Attention of all the Importers, Exporters, Customs Brokers, Steamer Agents, Custodians/Customs Cargo Service Providers, Trade Associations/Chamber of Commerce, Members of the RAC/PGC and the Public is invited to the Circular No. 12/2018-Customs dated 29.05.2018 issued from F. No.450/119/2017 by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs communicating procedure / guidelines for sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from GSTN

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

It has been observed that the exporters have inadvertently mis-declared IGST paid on export supplies as IGST paid on interstate domestic outward supplies while filing GSTR-3B. The exporters have also in certain cases short paid IGST vis-a-vis their liability declared in GSTR1. As a result of these mismatches in the amount of IGST paid on export goods between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, the transmission of records from GSTN to Customs EDI system has not happened and consequently IGST refunds could not be processed. The problem is compounded by the fact that the facility to adjust GSTR-3B in subsequent months is not available in all cases.
3. In view of the above following procedure is being prescribed to overcome the problem of refund blockage. This would be an interim solution subject to undertakings/ submission of CA certificates by the exporters as given below and post refund audit scrutiny. The proposed procedure is as under:
A. Cases where there is no short payment:
(i) The Customs p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aid certificate.
(iv) A copy of the certificate shall also be submitted to the jurisdictional GST office (Central/ State). The concerned Customs zone shall provide the list of GSTINs who have not submitted the CA certificate to the Board by the 15th November 2018.
(v) Non submission of CA certificate shall affect the future IGST refunds of the exporter.
(v) The list of exporters whose refunds have been processed as above shall be sent to DG (Audit)/ DG (GST) by the Board.
B. Cases where there is short payment:
(i) In cases where there is a short payment of IGST i.e. cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies together, for the period of July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is less than the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GSTR-1 for the same period, the Customs policy wing would send the list of such exporters to the GSTN and all the Chief Commissioner of Customs.
(ii) e-mails shall be sent by GSTN to each expor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

an ₹ 10 lacs, the exporter shall submit proof of payment (self-certified copy of challans) of IGST to the concerned Customs office at the port of export along with a certificate from chartered Account that the shortfall amount has been liquidated.
(v) The exporter would give an undertaking they would return the refund amount in case it is found to be not due to them at a later date.
(vi) The Customs zones shall compile the list of exporters (GSTIN only), who have come forward to claim refund after making requisite payment of IGST towards short paid amount and complied with other prescribed requirements.
(vii)The compiled list may be forwarded to Customs policy wing, DG (Audit) and DG (GST). Customs policy wing shall forward the said list of GSTINs to GSTN. On receipt of the list of exporters from Customs policy wing, GSTN shall transmit the records of those exporters to Customs EDI system.
(viii) The exporters whose refunds are processed / sanctioned as above would be req

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to the exporters under this procedure, the details of such detections may be communicated to the concerned GST formations for appropriate action.
5 DG (GST) shall send the list of exporters to jurisdictional GST officers (both Centre / State) informing that these exporters have taken benefit of the procedure prescribed in this circular. The jurisdictional GST formations shall also verify the payment particulars at their end.
6 This Circular deals only with the cases where the records have not been transmitted by GSTN to Customs EDI system. Once the records are transmitted by GSTN to Customs System based upon the above mentioned procedure, the usual procedure adopted in case of sanction of IGST refunds would have to be followed. In cases where the errors like SB005, SB002, SB006 etc are encountered with the records so transmitted, the provisions of Circulars issued by Board earlier shall apply to them.
7. The officers of Kakinada & Krishnapatnam Custom Houses and ICD, Marripalem, Gun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Customs – Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems – certain guidelines

Customs – Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems – certain guidelines
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs Dated:- 6-6-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTNIVE)
55-17-3, C-14, 2nd Floor, Road No.2, Industrial Estate, Autonagar, Vijayawada – 520007
Phone: 0866-2551261 Fax: 0866-2551156
C. No. VIII/09/01/2017-Cus.Tech.(PF-I)
Date: 06.06.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs
Subject : Regarding.
*****
Attention of all the Importers, Exporters, Customs Brokers, Steamer Agents, Custodians/Customs Cargo Service Providers, Trade Associations/Chamber of Commerce, Members of the RAC/PGC and the Public is invited to the Circular No. 12/2018-Customs dated 29.05.2018 issued from F. No.450/119/2017 by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs communicating procedure / guidelines for sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from GSTN

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

It has been observed that the exporters have inadvertently mis-declared IGST paid on export supplies as IGST paid on interstate domestic outward supplies while filing GSTR-3B. The exporters have also in certain cases short paid IGST vis-a-vis their liability declared in GSTRI. As a result of these mismatches in the amount of IGST paid on export goods between GSTR-I and GSTR-3B, the transmission of records from GSTN to Customs EDI system has not happened and consequently IGST refunds could not be processed. The problem is compounded by the fact that the facility to adjust GSTR-3B in subsequent months is not available in all cases.
3. In view of the above following procedure is being prescribed to overcome the problem of refund blockage. This would be an interim solution subject to undertakings/ submission of CA certificates by the exporters as given below and post refund audit scrutiny. The proposed procedure is as under:
A. Cases where there is no short payment:
(i) The Customs p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aid certificate.
(iv) A copy of the certificate shall also be submitted to the jurisdictional GST office (Central/ State). The concerned Customs zone shall provide the list of GSTINs who have not submitted the CA certificate to the Board by the 15th November 2018.
(v) Non submission of CA certificate shall affect the future IGST refunds of the exporter.
(vi) The list of exporters whose refunds have been processed as above shall be sent to DG (Audit)/ DG (GST) by the Board.
B. Cases where there is short payment:
(i) In cases where there is a short payment of IGST i.e. cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies together, for the period of July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is less than the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GSTR-I for the same period, the Customs policy wing would send the list of such exporters to the GSTN and all the Chief Commissioner of Customs.
(ii) e-mails shall be sent by GSTN to each expor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

an ₹ 10 lacs, the exporter shall submit proof of payment (self-certified copy of challans) of IGST to the concerned Customs office at the port of export along with a certificate from chartered Account that the shortfall amount has been liquidated.
(v) The exporter would give an undertaking they would return the refund amount in case it is found to be not due to them at a later date.
(vi) The Customs zones shall compile the list of exporters (GSTIN only), who have come forward to claim refund after making requisite payment of IGST towards short paid amount and complied with other prescribed requirements.
(vii) The compiled list may be forwarded to Customs policy wing, DG (Audit) and DG (GST). Customs policy wing shall forward the said list of GSTINs to GSTN. On receipt of the list of exporters from Customs policy wing, GSTN shall transmit the records of those exporters to Customs EDI system.
(viii) The exporters whose refunds are processed / sanctioned as above would be re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to the exporters under this procedure, the details of such detections may be communicated to the concerned GST formations for appropriate action.
5 DG (GST) shall send the list of exporters to jurisdictional GST officers (both Centre / State) informing that these exporters have taken benefit of the procedure prescribed in this circular. The jurisdictional GST formations shall also verify the payment particulars at their end.
6 This Circular deals only with the cases where the records have not been transmitted by GSTN to Customs EDI system. Once the records are transmitted by GSTN to Customs System based upon the above mentioned procedure, the usual procedure adopted in case of sanction of IGST refunds would have to be followed. In cases where the errors like SB005, SB002, SB006 etc are encountered with the records so transmitted, the provisions of Circulars issued by Board earlier shall apply to them.
7. The officers of Kakinada & Krishnapatnam Custom Houses and ICD, Marripalem, Gu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IGST Refund Simplification of Process – Elimination of Errors

IGST Refund Simplification of Process – Elimination of Errors
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 72/2018 Dated:- 6-6-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS – IV
EXPORTS ACC, SAHAR, ANDHERI (EAST), MUMBAI-400099.
F.No.-S/3-Misc-254/2017-18 DBK(EDI)/ACC
Date: 06.06.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 72/2018
Sub: IGST Refund Simplification of Process – Elimination of Errors-reg.
Attention of Exporters/ Customs Brokers and General Public is invited to the Board's Circular no. 12/2018 dated 29.05.2018 and 08/2018 dt. 23.03.2018 and ICES advisories 05/2018, 20/2018, 21/2018, 22/2018 and 23/2018 on the above subject. These Circulars/DG(System)'s advisories address the various issues being faced by the Exporters in getting the IGST refund expeditiously. Based on these Circulars/Advisories, this Public Notice is issued for the knowledge and utility of all the stake holders concerned.
2. In terms of Para 2(ii) Board's Circular 08/2018 dt. 23.03.2018 , an option has been

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he corresponding returns have been filed through another GSTIN with the same PAN, will also be sanctioned through the Officer Interface. In such cases, the Exporters are required to submit to the Officer an undertaking obtained from the GST registered unit which has filed the returns that they have no objection to the refund being granted to the exporter who has filed the Shipping Bill and they will not claim any IGST Refund for under that SB separately. once satisfied, the officer will sanction the applicable IGST Refund through the Officer Interface.
4. Further. it has been noticed that despite the efforts to update the bank accounts with PFMS before generation of IGST Refund scrolls, some scrolls are still getting rejected at PFMS end and in some cases, the scrolls get accepted successfully but the crediting of amount fails for one or more exporters due to invalidation by the concerned bank to PFMS. An automated system of reversal/return of such 'Failed-after-Success' trans

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is icegate email id. The System Manager shall then ask the sanctioning authority (AC/DC of Refunds)to obtain the correct Bank Account details of the beneficiary and update the same in ICES in CLK role. The correct account details shall then be sentback the duly verified/signed document to the Central DDO by email to cddo.customs@icegate.gov.in in the following format:
Transaction ID:
Name of the Beneficiary:
IEC:
Bank Account Details
Already provided
Corrected/Revised
Account No:
Account No:
IFSC Code:
LFSC Code:
c. The DDO shall forward the scanned copy of the duly verified corrected Bank Account details to the PAO/e-PAO through email. The PAO/e-PAO shall, based on verified Bank account details, correct the account details and reprocess the failed bill for payments.
5. The above procedure is in line with the 0M dated 26.04.2018 issued by the O/o Pr CCA, CBIC on the above subject. It will be ensured that the verified account details are emailed to the above ID by the syste

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =