SAHEER P.M. Versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (TAXES) , GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE GST, KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA, ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SURVEILLANCE, WAYANAD, THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY (REVENUE) , NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NET WORK, NEW DELHI AND CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES, KERALA. – 2018 (12) TMI 140 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI – Detention of goods with vehicle – detention on the ground that E-way bill did not contain the details of the vehicle used for the transport – Held that:- The learned Division Bench of this Court in Renji Lal Damodaran v. St
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ndent : SMT. M. M. JASMINE, GP. SRI SREELAL N WARRIER, SC. AND SRI P. R. SREEJITH, SC JUDGMENT The petitioner, a proprietory firm, purchased LED TVs from Mysore, as seen from Ext.P2 invoice. Ext.P3 E-way bill, however, did not contain the details of the vehicle used for the transport. The vehicle and the goods detained, the petitioner filed this writ petition. 2. In the writ petition, the petitioner sought the following reliefs: (i) Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or writs or an order or a direction to quash Ext.P7 detention order and Ext.P8 notice and to issue necessary directions to the 3rd respondent to release the goods detained under Exts.P7 and P8, forthwith to the petitioner (ii) Issue writ of mandamus or any o
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =