2018 (5) TMI 375 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI – Stay of Recovery proceedings – petitioner prays that the recovery against him be interdicted at least until such time as the stay petition is considered by the Appellate Tribunal – Held that: – the petitioner can be given some respite from the rigor of recovery, at least until such time as his stay petition is considered by the Appellate Tribunal – Until such time as the Appellate Tribunal passes an order on the stay petition, and communicates the same to the petitioner, all steps for recovery of amounts against the petitioner, confirmed through Ext.P1 assessment order, shall be kept in abeyance – petition allowed. – W. P. (C) No. 14720 of 2018 Dated:- 27-4-2018 – MR. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J. For
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
essed tax from him through Ext.P3 demand notice. The petitioner prays that the recovery against him be interdicted at least until such time as the rectification application is considered by the 1st respondent. 2. The learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that, it is true that the petitioner has preferred rectification application before the 1st respondent, but he says that since the amount involved is substantial, no order of stay may be granted, except on terms. 3. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader. 4. Taking note of similar orders passed by this Court in analogous situations, I am of the view that the petitioner can
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =