2018 (5) TMI 368 – KERLA HIGH COURT – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 404 (Ker.) , [2018] 2 GSTL 128 (Ker) – Detention of vehicle – consignment was not supported by e-way bill – Held that: – the vehicle can be released on the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the entire amount as shown in Ext.P2 as well as after executing a bond under the Rule 140(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules – petition disposed off. – W.P.(C) No. 14566 of 2018 Dated:- 27-4-2018 – MR. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN J BY ADV.SRI.C.K.SREEJITH R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. RAVI KRISHNAN JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges the detention of his vehicle ordered through Ext.P2. He says that the primary reason shown in Ext.P2 is that the consignment was not supported by e-way
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =