Dura Line India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Customs Goa

Dura Line India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Customs Goa
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 767 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 22-5-2018
Appeal No. E/85637/18 – A/86806/2018
Central Excise
Mr. Sanjiv Srivastava, Member (Technical)
Ms. Anjali Hirawat, Advocate for appellant
Shri A.B. Kulgod, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent
ORDER
Per: Sanjiv Srivastava
The issue in the appeal is in respect of admissibility of CENVAT credit availed in respect of services provided by the over-seas commission agent including the services of sales promotion by the appellant.
2. The matter was represented by Ms Anajali Hirawat, Advocate on behalf of the appellant and Shri A.B. Kulgod, Authorised Representative on behalf of Revenue.
3. Heard both sides and perused the records.
4. Relying on following decisions, learned Counsel argued that in respect of the same services provided by the overseas commission agents, CENVAT Credit have continuously been allowed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(b) Essar Steel India Ltd. v. CCE & ST – 2016 (335) ELT 660 (Tri. – Ahmd)
(c) CCE ST v. Shivalik Rasayan Ltd. – 2016 -TIOL-3412- CESTAT-Del
(d) Beloorbayir Biotech Ltd. v. CCE – 2018 (5) TMI 24 – CESTAT Bangalore
(e) CCE v Shree Rathi Steel (Dakshin) Ltd – 2018 (5) TMI CESTAT New Delhi.
4.2 Lastly, on limitation, she submitted that since there was contradicting views on the issue, larger period of limitation should not be invoked in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court as follows:-
(a) Blue Star Ltd. v. Union of India – 2015 (322) ELT 820 (SC)
(b) Continental Foundation Jt. Venture v. CCE – 2007 (216) ELT 177 (SC).
5. On the contrary learned A.R. reiterated the finding of the Commissioner.
6. I have considered the matter along with the sample agreement with the commission agents. From the agreement produced by the appellant which has been made between M/s. MAZER-the foreign commission agents and the appellant clearly placed the responsibility to undertake activ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

otherwise agreed by both the parties.
(e) MASER will be responsible for (i) developing marketing plans to generate salesof products; (ii) identifying the key decision makers and contacts for the purchase of Products; (iii) aggressively promoting the sale of products and other business objectives of DURALINE; (iv) providing guidance to DURALINE concerning the customs and practices of public agencies and private business and liaison between DURALINE and such agencies and businesses; (v) occasionally providing translation, interpretation, administrative support and other similar services as requested, (vi) Jointly preparing tenders and compliance statements and other submission and compliances. As an independent contractor, MASER shall be responsible for the manner in which and the time during which the above-described services are performed; however, in so doing MASER agrees to use its best efforts to promote the sale of the said products.
(f) MASER represents and warrants to DURALI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er form of communication received from any Governmental agency in regard to the activities contemplated herein under. MASER shall b liable for any representations that DURALINE has not specifically authorized in writing.
(i) MASER shall perform its business activities in compliance with all the State laws, rules and regulations concerning marketing and sale of DURALINE products while performing its duties pursuant to this agreement and shall not violate such laws, rules or regulations.
“6. Sales Target:
a. MASER shall endeavor to secure maximum sale for DURALINE in the said TERRITORY.
b. MASER will submit sector-wise regular market potential of the said TERRITORY on a quarterly basis as per the attached BBC format.
7. Payment:
On specific orders/requirement of MASER, DURALINE shall supply its products agreed by both parties. The payment for each shall be made by MASER as per the terms and conditions laid down in the relative Purchase Order for the procurement of the products.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ote or sell any other similar product of any other company, which is directly competitive in nature to DURALINE, subject to the provisions in clause 4 c.
11. Confidentiality:
Except as expressly agreed to in writing by DURALINE, MASER shall not at any time or in any manner, directly or indirectly, use of disclose to any party and trade secrets of DURALINE. During the term hereof and, for a period of 1 year thereafter MASER will treat as proprietary the information belonging to DURALINE disclosed to MASER under this Agreement. MASER agrees that within 72 hours following effective date of termination or non-renewal hereof MASER will return to DURALINE all information and materials in its possession concerning the trade secrets, customer information and lists, proprietary information and research of DURALINE.
12. Termination: Non-Renewal:
a) All obligations arising out of the commitments made during the tenure of the Agreement shall be fulfilled by both parties even after the termina

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

terminate this Agreement on sixty (60) days prior written notice to MASER.
I. If either party in its own judgment feels that the agreement with other party is either detrimental to or not beneficial to its business in Thailand or any other market.
II. If MASER fails to meet any of its annual revenue goals for the year; or
III. If MASER liquidates or discontinues its business or terminates the majority of its sales force in the Territory; or
IV. If DURALINE discontinues manufacturing/marketing of the Said Products. Under this provision MASER will be given as option of a last time buy.
V. If MASER starts its own manufacturing of the said products.
13. Jurisdiction:
In the event of any dispute or difference or any other incidental matter relating to this agreement the courts of competent jurisdiction in India only to the exclusion of all other courts shall have jurisdiction and would be competent to adjudicate all the matters arising out of, related to and/or connected with this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

usa to india

usa to india
Query (Issue) Started By: – kalathur narasimhan Dated:- 21-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 22-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
When I ship commercial goods form USA to Indian Firm do I need to register for GST
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
In terms of Section 7(2) of IGST Act, 2017, which reads as follows:-
“(2) Supply of goods imported into the territory of India, till they cross the customs frontiers of India, shall be treated to be a supply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Manufacturing export and merchant export

Manufacturing export and merchant export
Query (Issue) Started By: – Abhay Inamdar Dated:- 21-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 22-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
Pls guide whether a manufacturing exporter can do MERCHANT EXPORT with same GSTIN.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
The GST regime is supply based, export is considered as zero-rated supply. As a manufacturing exporter, a person receives input(s) in order to make finished goods. For example, ingredients a, b and c are received and final product X is made out of it and same is exported. On other than a person receives product X and exports it. Every person can export the goods and/or services. In GST even unregistered person can export goods and/o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Employee Transfer to Related Party company – Gratuity

Employee Transfer to Related Party company – Gratuity
Query (Issue) Started By: – SARAVANAN RENGACHARY Dated:- 21-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 22-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
Two companies are related. i.e. ABC Private Limited and XYZ Private Limited.
An employee of the company (ABC) is permanently transferred to another company (XYZ). Subsequently, accrued Gratuity liability of the employee is also transferred from ABC to XYZ. Money is transferr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council asks Centre, states to quickly set up appellate authorities

GST Council asks Centre, states to quickly set up appellate authorities
GST
Dated:- 21-5-2018

New Delhi, May 20 (PTI) The GST Council has asked the Centre and states to expedite setting up of appellate authorities for aggrieved entities to appeal against orders of the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR).
With AARs in different states started giving rulings since March, it has become imperative for the Centre as well as states to set up the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR), an official said.
"The Secretariat of the GST Council has shot off letters to the states as well as the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) to nominate members to the AAAR on an urgent basis so that they can start functioni

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tates are required to set up at least one AAR for seeking advance ruling over GST levy and one appellate authority to hear appeals against the AAR order.
According to experts, the business entities, which are aggrieved by the decision of AAR, currently do not have any remedy in the absence of an appellate authority.
Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP Partner (Indirect Tax) M S Mani said businesses will not be able to file appeals against advance rulings unless the appellate authority is set up in every state.
"The recent increase in AAR decisions needs to be matched by a quick constitution of the appellate authority in all states. The constitution of the AAAR should also be on the lines of the CESTAT (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GIST OF RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS ON GST (PART-XI)

GIST OF RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS ON GST (PART-XI)
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 21-5-2018

Goods and Services Tax (GST), introduced from July 1, 2017 is more than ten months old now but has resulted in operational and implementation disruptions affecting all stakeholders. GST law, as drafted and legislated, is not free from the interpretational hassles. GST Council his however, making regular changes to fix the anomalies and hardships faced by taxpayers.
Taxpayers have already started challenging various provisions of GST laws and rules framed thereunder with more than 180 writs being filed in different courts. High courts and Supreme court have taken a liberal stand so far in view of the fact that law is new and is yet evolving. However, CBIC may move to Supreme court where the verdict is against the Government. This has also been indicated in Circular No. 39 dated 03.04.2018 wherein it is has been hinted in relation to resolution of struc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

inistrative charges as well as GST on same activity.
Molasses is an important raw material for chemical industries and industrial alcohol. Administrative charges were claimed to be in the nature of tax. Since both charges / tax shall tantamount to double taxation, petitioners filed this writ who were willing to pay GST. Further, in view of fact that a similar matter is pending before Apex Court in relation to trade tax vis-à-vis administrative charges, court granted interim stay from collection of administrative charges till final decision in the matter subject to the petitioners paying GST.
It was also directed that separate accounts be maintained for sale / supply / purchase of molasses till final disposal.
* In Tara Chand Saluja v. Union of India 2018 (5) TMI 275 – DELHI HIGH COURT ; where the assessee could not file TRAN-1 / TRAN-2 forms in due time due to technical errors in the GSTN system. On a question for claiming input tax credit when it could not be availed due to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Indirect Taxes and Customs.
* In L.G. Electronic India Pvt. Ltd. v. State of UP 2018 (3) TMI 1318 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT , where the competent authority had caused inspection of goods in movement and seized goods alongwith the vehicle for want of e-way bill. The court directed that the seized goods of the assessee as well as vehicle be released by the authorities forthwith on the assessee's furnishing security other than cash and bank guarantee of the proposed tax and penalty and indemnity bond of the value of the seized goods. The revenue was allowed to file counter affidavit within a month after which petitioner could file the rejoinder.
* In Level 10 Retail Venture v. State Tax Officer 2018 (4) TMI 346 (Kerala); where the state tax officer had detained the textile goods under transport as well as the vehicle on the plea that the goods were not accompanied by the valid documents as contemplated under the CGST Act and SGST Act and Rules. He also insisted the assessee to pay the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ner submitted that as admittedly the seized goods were in transit for outside the state the transaction would be covered by the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST) read with Central GST and that the provisions of the UPGST or its Rulesor the notifications issued therein would not apply.
Rule 138 of the Rules framed under the Central GST provides that till such time e-way bill system is developed and approved by the Council, the Government by notification may specify the documents which are to be carried with the consignment of goods. In exercise of the said power a notification has been issued which provides for the carrying of e-way bill with the goods in transit but the same is applicable has been enforced w.e.f. 01.02.2018. Court observed that the soled ground of seizure of goods is non-production of e-way bill whereas there is no dispute with regard to issuance of invoice and charge of tax by the petitioner.
It was held that there was no error on the part of petiti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Golden Tobacco Ltd., M/s Chinar Cigarettes (P) Ltd. Versus CGST, Delhi

M/s Golden Tobacco Ltd., M/s Chinar Cigarettes (P) Ltd. Versus CGST, Delhi
Central Excise
2018 (5) TMI 1300 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – 2019 (370) E.L.T. 1036 (Tri. – Del.)
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 21-5-2018
Excise Appeal Nos. 3396, 3935 & 3965 of 2010 – Final Order No. 51920-51922/2018
Central Excise
Satish Chandra, President And Bijay Kumar, Member ( Technical )
For the Petitioner : Sh. V.K. Bindal, CA
For the Respondent : Sh. R. K. Mishra, DR
ORDER
Per Bijay Kumar
All the present appeals are filed by the assessee-Appellants against the Order-in-Appeal No. 16-21/CE/PKJ/CCE/ADJ/2010 dated 09.07.2010 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Delhi.
2. This is the second round of litigation before the Tribunal. Earlier the Tribunal vide Final Order dated 10.04.2002 had remanded the matter to the original authority for deciding the issue afresh. In compliance with the directions, the impugned order has been passed where duty has been demanded and penal

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

However, on verification of the said records, it was found that there were duplicate invoices and somewhere duplicate entries were also made in the books. In some cases, for the invoices bearing same serial number, the bill amounts were different. In the case of two invoices of the identical serial number, first original invoice was supported by the original gate pass and the other original invoice of the identical serial number was supported by the photocopy of the same Central Excise gate pass and both these invoices were discounted by the franchise units from their respective banks.
5. According to the assessee-Appellants, this exercise was done intentionally to obtain the bank loans from the different banks. But the Department has refused the plea and demanded the duty on all duplicate bills also and entries made. The Department has also imposed penalties. Being aggrieved, the assessee-Appellants have filed the present appeals.
6. With this background, we have heard Shri V.K. Bin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he cigarettes factories, no irregularity was noticed pertaining to the assessee-Appellants even on their surprise visits.
8. It is the submission of the learned Chartered Accountant that some additional evidence came to the notice of the Department in the searches conducted in the year 1995 subsequent to the issuance of the show cause notice in the instant case. The original search was conducted in the year 1993. The adjudicating authority has accepted the additional evidence holding that the allegation of unaccounted receipt of material and clandestine removal of cigarettes were already levelled against the noticees in the show cause notices and no new allegations are sought to be added by additional evidences nor any additional liability is demanded. It is the further submission of the learned Chartered Accountant that the records seized from the premises of the assessee-Appellants or its franchise units did not show iota of evidence to prove clandestine removal of the cigarettes. N

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GTC as a financing arrangement, which, on the due date i.e. three months from the date of discounting were paid by GTC to the discounting bank of the franchisee units by honouring its Hundis of the accommodation bills. Thus, in this manner, three months were availed by GTC from the banks of the franchisee units on the basis of its Hundis/accommodation bills/bills of exchanges etc. without giving any guarantee or assets as security to the banks of the franchisee units.
9. The learned Chartered Accountant further submits that the assessee-Appellants and franchisee units were, during the period under dispute i.e. February, 1989 to March, 1992, under the strict physical control and supervision of the Excise Officer who supervised the manufacturing activities very closely. For this purpose, records were maintained by the Excise Officers posted there in the diary XT-1 for movement of the goods. The Departmental Officers having been constantly present and closely supervising all the activit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

v) Leather Chemicals & Industries Ltd., Calcutta vs CCE, Calcutta, 1984 (15) ELT 451 (T);
(vi) Kale Khan Mohd. Hanif vs CCE, Nagpur, 2001 (132) ELT 374 (T-Mum);
(vii) Norton Intec Rubbers (P) Ltd. vs CCE, Madras, 2004 (164) ELT 5 (Mad); and
(viii) New Tobacco Ltd. vs CCE, Visakhapatnam-II, 2007 (208) ELT 257 (T-Bang.).
11. The learned Chartered Accountant further submits that no action of any nature whatsoever has been taken against the Excise Officers in all the cigarettes supplying manufacturing units located all over the country, so allegation of clandestine removal cannot be sustained. He also submits that duplicate bills were merely an accommodation bills and there was no actual physical movement of the goods. All the transactions were duly recorded in the books of accounts of both the parties. He also informed that ITAT has deleted the additions made on this ground under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1992-93, so similar treatment may be given in the present ca

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s not physically dealt with the goods liable for confiscation. For the purpose, he relied upon the following case laws :
(i) Rakesh Kumar Garg vs CCE, 2016 (331) ELT 321 (Del-HC);
(ii) CCE vs Bansal Steel Corporation & Ors. (HC-Mum), dated 12.09.2017 www. taxscan.in
(iii) MEK Slotted Angles (I) Ltd. vs CCE, Belapur, (2009) 247 ELT 364 (Mumbai-CESTAT);
(iv) Broadway Textiles Ltd. vs CCE, Kanpur, (1999) taxmann.com 385 (CESTAT-New Delhi); and
(v) Sujana Metal Products Ltd., 2016 (335) ELT 218 (Madras)
13. Lastly, he made a request that the impugned order may kindly be set aside.
14. On the other hand, the learned DR for the Department, heavily relied upon the impugned order as also the show cause notice. It is his submission that the goods were discounted by the Bank only when the receipt of the goods were duly acknowledged by the GTC on the duplicate bills. This shows that there was actual movement of goods on duplicate bills without payment of excise duty. According to the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ce of the show cause notice and is contrary to the evidence of the officers of the Bank who were concerned with discounting of bills. It is also seen that the statements of the Bank Officers that they were not concerned with physical verification of movement of goods have been mis-interpreted by the noticees to give the impression that discounting could be done without the movement of goods in spite of endorsement on the documents by GTC of receipt of cigarettes. During the course of arguments, the learned DR read out para 97 of the impugned order wherein it is stated that manufacture of cigarettes is subject to physical control and the Department has also prescribed a detailed Cigarette Manual which regulates every activity in connection with the manufacture of cigarettes. It was also contended that demands on the basis of clandestine removal cannot be made and established in cases where there is physical control except through unimpeachable evidence of clandestine clearance. Accordin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ture of cigarettes is subject to physical control and the Department has also prescribed a detailed Cigarette Manual which regulates every activity in connection with the manufacture of cigarettes. It was also contended that demands on the basis of clandestine removal cannot be made and established in cases where there is physical control except through unimpeachable evidence of clandestine clearance without knowledge of the departmental officers and in violation of the guidelines issued.
18. As per the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Audh Sugar Mills, 1978 (2) ELT J172, it was held that in the case of physical control units, cannot be held that there was suppression of facts and the assessee clandestinely manufactured and removed the goods so as to invoke the extended period of limitation.
19. Undoubtedly, in the instant case, during the period February, 1989 to March, 1992, all the franchisee units were under the strict physical control and supervision o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e duty is paid thereupon and original excise gate pass, is self-supporting evidence for despatch of the goods. The buyer acknowledges the receipt of the goods on the bill confirming that the goods have been received. But in case of duplicate/accommodation bills, the goods were not received but only for the purpose of discounting, the receipt is acknowledge with no corresponding evidence of actual movement of the goods. These documents in original along with a Hundi accepted by buyer and were presented to their bank by the franchisee units for bill discounting. The amount of the bill after deducting charges and interest for the period of bill (normal 90 days) is credited in the bank account of the franchisee units at the time of discounting the bill by the bank. The same is paid by the buyer on the due date of bill. In this manner, the buyer avails a credit facility of 90 days to make the payment of his purchases whereas the seller gets the sale proceeds immediately on presentation of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed on the basis of physical verification of goods, but the bank would go by the document representing the title of the goods. Another bank official, Mr. Venkatraman Iyer, in cross-examination has stated that the bank was dealing in the documents of title of the goods and physical movement of the goods was not within their purview. Similarly, Mr. Pramod Kumar, another official of the Bank, also confirmed during cross-examination that the banks were not physically verifying the transactions and that bill discounting may have been done on the basis of Xerox copies of the invoices.
23. From the record it appears that, all the transactions of the bill discounting were duly recorded in the books of account of both the parties.
24. In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the assessee-Appellants has committed a fraud with the Banks by raising the duplicate bills. For this financial irregularity, Department will be at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings under the relevant law

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Andaman and Nicobar Islands – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government, rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 315(E), dated the 31st March, 2018

Andaman and Nicobar Islands – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government, rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 315(E), dated the 31st March, 2018
10/2018 Dated:- 21-5-2018 Union Territory GST (UTGST)
GST
UTGST
UTGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION No. 10/2018-Union Territory Tax
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
G.S.R. 470(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of section 22 of the Union Territory Goods and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Lakshadweep – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government, rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 319(E), dated the 31st March, 2018

Lakshadweep – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government, rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 319(E), dated the 31st March, 2018
11/2018 Dated:- 21-5-2018 Union Territory GST (UTGST)
GST
UTGST
UTGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION No. 11/2018-Union Territory Tax
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
G.S.R. 471(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of section 22 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Ac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s VARDH PAPER PRODUCTS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX/GST & ANR.

M/s VARDH PAPER PRODUCTS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX/GST & ANR.
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1392 – SC Order – TMI
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA – SC
Dated:- 21-5-2018
Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13483/2018
GST
Mr. A.M. Khanwilkar And Mr. Navin Sinha JJ.
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Bhatia, Adv., Mr. Brijesh Jauhari, Adv., Dr. Brij Bhushan K. Jauhari, Adv., Ms. Purnima, Adv., Mr. Harsh Mahan, Adv. And Mr. Deepak Anand, AOR
For the Respondent(s) : None
ORDER

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

KOCHURANI BABY, PROPRIETRIX, M/s. BEVERLY IMPEX Versus STATE TAX OFFICER, FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KOTTAYAM

KOCHURANI BABY, PROPRIETRIX, M/s. BEVERLY IMPEX Versus STATE TAX OFFICER, FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KOTTAYAM
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (5) TMI 1493 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-5-2018
W.P. (C).No.16304 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. Tomson T. Emmanuel
For The Respondent : Smt. M. M. Jasmine
JUDGMENT
Challenging Ext.P3 appellate order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the petitioner preferred Ext.P4 appeal before the Kerala Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal. Ext.P5 is the application preferred by the petitioner

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

shall be done within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. If the delay in filing the appeal is condoned and if the petitioner does not produce materials indicating remittance of 30% of the disputed tax in the meanwhile, the Tribunal shall pass orders on the application for stay preferred by the petitioner also, within the aforesaid time limit. On the other hand, if the delay in filing the appeal is condoned and if the petitioner produces materials indicating remittance of 30% of the disputed tax in the meanwhile, the Tribunal shall dispose of the appeal itself, within three months thereafter. Needless to say that till orders are passed on the application for condoning the delay or the application for stay or the ap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendments in Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017

Amendments in Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017
F-A 3-15-2018-I-V (47) Dated:- 21-5-2018 Madhya Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Madhya Pradesh SGST
Madhya Pradesh SGST
Commercial Tax Department
Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal
Bhopal, the 21st May 2018
No. F-A 3-15-2018-I-V (47). -In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 164 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the State Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely :-
AMENDMENTS
1. Amendment in rule 89. -After sub-rule 4B in rule 89 of Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2018, herein after referred to as said rules, the following shall be substituted, for sub-rule (5), namely :-
"(5). In the case of refund on account of inverted duty structure, refund of input tax credit shall be granted as per the following formula :-
Maximum Refund Amount = { (Turnover of inverted rated su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, read with Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, shall be deposited in the Fund.
(2) Where any amount, having been credited to the Fund, is ordered or directed to be paid to any claimant by the proper officer, appellate authority or court, the same shall be paid from the Fund.
(3) Accounts of the Fund maintained by the Central Government shall be subject to audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
(4) The Government shall, by an order, constitute a Standing Committee (hereinafter referred to as the 'Committee) with a Chairman, a Vice-Chairman, a Member Secretary and such other members as it may deem fit and the Committee shall make recommendations for proper utilization of the money credited to the Fund for welfare of the consumers.
(5) (a) The Committee shall meet as and when necessary, generally four times in a year;
(b) the Committee shall meet at such time and place as the Chai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ontrol of the applicant, as may be necessary for proper evaluation of the application;
(c) to required any applicant to allow entry and inspection of any premises, from which activities claimed to be for the welfare of consumers are stated to be carried on, to a duly authorized officer of the State Government, as the case may be;
(d) to get the accounts of the applicants audited, for ensuring proper utilization of the grant;
(e) to require any applicant, in case of any default, or suppression of material information on his part, to refund in lump-sum along with accrued interest, the sanctioned grant to the Committee, and to be subject to prosecution under the Act;
(f) to recover any sum due from any applicant in accordance with the provisions of the Act;
(g) to require any applicant, or class of applicants to submit a periodical report, indicating proper utilization of the grant;
(h) to reject an application placed before it on account of factual inconsistency, or inaccurac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ective basis) for reimbursing legal expenses incurred by a complainant, or class of complainants in a consumer dispute, after its final adjudication;
(d) for making available grants for any other purpose recommended by the Central Consumer Protection Council (as may be considered appropriate by the Committee);
(e) for making available up to 50% of the funds credited to the Fund each year, for publicity/consumer awareness on GST, provided the availability of funds for consumer welfare activities of the Department of Consumer Affairs is not less than twenty-five crore rupees per annum.
Explanation – For the purposes of this rule.
(a) 'applicant' means, –
(i). the Central Government or State Government;
(ii) regulatory authorities or autonomous bodies constituted under an Act of Parliament or the Legislature of a State or Union Territory;
(iii) any agency or organization engaged in consumer welfare activities for a minimum period of three years, registered under the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the form as specified by the Standing Committee from time to time;
(c) 'Central Consumer Protection Council' means the Central Consumer Protection Council, established under sub-section (l) of section 4 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Central Act No. 68 of 1986), for promotion and protection of rights of consumers;
(d) 'Committee' means the Committee constituted under sub-rule (4);
(e) 'consumer' has the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (d) of sub-section (l) of section 2 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Central Act No. 68 of 1986), and includes consumer of goods on which central tax has been paid;
(f) Fund' means the Fund established by the State Government under section 57 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (No. 19 of 2017);
(g) 'proper officer' means the officer having the power under the Act to make an order that the whole or any part of the state tax is refundable;
3. Amendment in FORM GST ITC-0

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Entry
Description of inputs held in stock, inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock and capital goods /plant and machinery
Unit Quantity
Code (UQC)
Qty
Value (As adjusted by debit / credit note)
Input tax credit/
Tax payable (whichever is higher) (Rs.)
No.
Date
Central tax
State/
Union territory tax
Integrated tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
8 (a) Inputs held in stock (where invoice is available)
8 (b) Inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock (where invoice is available)
8 (c) Capital goods/plant and machinery held in stock
8 (d) Inputs held in stock or inputs as contained in semi-finished /finished goods held in stock ( where invoice is not available)
9. Amount of tax payable and paid (based on Table 8)
Sr.
No
.
Description
ITC reversible/T ax payable
Tax paid along with application for cancellation of registration (GST REG-16)
Balance tax payable (3-4)
Amount paid through d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

who are registered as :-
(i) Input Service Distributors;
(ii) Persons paying tax under section 10;
(iii) Non-resident taxable person;
(iv) Persons required to deduct tax at source under section 51; and
(v) Persons required to collect tax at source under section 52.
2. Details of stock of inputs, inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods and stock of capital goods/plant and machinery on which input tax credit has been availed.
3. Following points need to be taken care of while providing details of stock at Sl. No.8:
(i) where the tax invoices related to the inputs held in stock or inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock are not available, the registered person shall estimate the amount under sub-rule (3) of rule 44 based on prevailing market price of the goods;
(ii) in case of capital goods/ plant and machinery, the value should be the invoice value reduced by 1/60th per month or part thereof from the date of invoice/purchase taking useful l

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Waives the late fee payable under section 47 of the said Act for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B

Waives the late fee payable under section 47 of the said Act for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B
31 Dated:- 21-5-2018 Puducherry SGST
GST – States
Puducherry SGST
Puducherry SGST
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
COMMERCIAL TAXES SECRETARIAT
G.O. Ms. No. 31
Puducherry, the 21st May, 2018
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Puducherry Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No.6 of 2017), the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, on the recom

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Surinder Arora Enterprises Versus State of Punjab And others

M/s Surinder Arora Enterprises Versus State of Punjab And others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 172 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 423 (P & H)
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-5-2018
CWP-4180-2018 (O&M)
GST
MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND MR. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, JJ.
For The Petitioners : Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate, Mr. J.S. Bedi, Advocate,  Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
For The Respondents : Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate, Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate,  Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Arun Gosain, Advocate & Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate
ORDER
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.ACJ (Oral)
This order shall dispose of CWP Nos.4180, 4361, 4362,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, the petitioners have migrated to GST Act and due to which certain difficulties are being faced by them as well as by other assessees. In such circumstances, they have approached this Court for redressal of the grievances.
4. On 25.4.2018, it was brought to the notice of the Court that Delhi High Court had dealt with similar matters by a common order dated 09.04.2018 passed in W.P.(C) 1300/2018 titled as Sare Realty Projects Private Limited Vs. Union of India & others and other connected petitions.
5. Accordingly, while adjourning these matters for today, petitioners were granted liberty to approach the Nodal Officer or the Redressal Committee concerned for redressal of their grievances in accordance with the Circular No.39/13/2018-GST d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the order. It is directed that in the event of representations being filed by the petitioners within the aforesaid period of five days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order, such representations as well as the representations already filed, shall be forwarded to the I.T. Redressal Committee concerned within next fifteen days after verification by the G.S.T.N and the Committee shall thereafter decide the same in terms of clause 5.4 of Circular No.39/13/2018-GST dated 3.4.2018 by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representations. The petitioners shall be entitled to lead any evidence to substantiate t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Mane India Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Excise & Service Tax, Medchal – GST

Mane India Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Excise & Service Tax, Medchal – GST
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 185 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 21-5-2018
Appeal No. E/31329/2017 – Final Order No. A/30602/2018
Central Excise
Hon'ble Mr. M. V. Ravindran, Member ( Judicial )
Shri K. Chandra Sekhar, Consultant for the Appellant
Shri Dass Thavanam, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
[ Order Per : M. V. Ravindran ]
This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. HYDEXCUS- MD-AP2-041-17-18 dated 30.08.2017.
2. Relevant facts that arise for consideration are the appellants are the manufacturers of Fragrances and Flavoring Essences. They registered with the Central Excise Department vide CER No. AACCM1243JXM001. They are availing credit of duty paid on inputs and input services under the provisions of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and utilizing the same for payment of duty on final products. Their accounts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e ineligible CENVAT credit of service tax on the services received at R& D unit and utilized the same for payment of excise duties with intent to evade payment of excise duty in contravention of CENVAT Credit Rules. It was also viewed that the contravention of provisions and evasion of duty is unearthed only on the departmental intervention, meriting recovery of duty for the extended period under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1994. The notice was adjudicated in the impugned order, culminating in the instant appeal, wherein the proposals were confirmed as follows:
a) Confirmed the demand of Rs. 28,75,157/- being the irregular CENVAT credit availed under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules read with Section 11A(10) of Central Excise Act, 1944.
b) Appropriated Rs. 11,26,813/- already paid by them against above demand.
c) Confirmed the interest applicable under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules read with Section 11AA of Central Excise Act.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and also R&D wing activity which are manufacturing activity of the appellant. It is his submission for both the lower authorities recorded that the research conducted in the appellant's premises at Mumbai office has not resulted in any commercial activity and ineligible to avail CENVAT credit. It is his submission, as a specimen case in one item they were research was conducted and commercial production was undertaken. As regards the Central Excise duty paid on works contract service, it is his submission that the work contracts service which is awarded for modernization of the office premises. He is draws my attention, works order nothing but modernization and the CENVAT credit of service tax is correctly availed as the modernization of the office is not excluded eligibility to avail CENVAT credit. He relied upon the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Ahmednagar Forgings Ltd., [2017 (6) G.S.T.L. 54] and Heidelberg, Cement India Ltd., [2017 (6) G.S.T.L. (473)] for the proposition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petrochemicals [2013 (30) STR 475] for the proposition that the Mumbai office having not been registered as input service distributor, appellant factory at Hyderabad unit cannot be availed the CENVAT credit of the service tax paid on renting of immovable property service, security services, cleaning service, internet service and business auxiliary services and relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Maruthi Suzuki India Ltd., [2016 (336) ELT 266] for the proposition that nothing used in R&D activity, CENVAT credit cannot be availed as R&D activity it is excluded itself.
5. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides and perused the records. On perusal of records, as correctly put forth by both sides, the issue is regarding eligibility to avail CENVAT credit of the service tax paid on renting of immovable property service, security services, cleaning service, internet service and business auxiliary service has also works contra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he service tax credit of other services availed, I find that these services are rendered by the service providers at the Mumbai premises which was used by the appellant for the sales related activity, marketing and research of the few products. I find that the lower authorities are denying the CENVAT credit to the appellant on the ground that the products which were researched at Mumbai, nevertheless, were not in relation to manufacturing activity, were not commercially produced. In my view these findings are acceptance of fact that seems R & D activity was undertaken at Mumbai as there cannot be any dispute that it is in interest of the business, research and development is a primary requirement. I find that the lower authorities have stated in the orders that if the appellant should have obtained registration under input service distributor, which would indicate that services rendered at Mumbai, were in relation to the activity of manufacturing done at Hyderabad. In my view, the plea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s ALP Nishikawa Company Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India And others

M/s ALP Nishikawa Company Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India And others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 230 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 356 (P & H)
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-5-2018
CWP-10194-2018 (O&M)
GST
MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ AND MR. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, JJ.
For The Petitioner : Mr. Amar Pratap Singh, Advocate
For The Respondents : Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate
ORDER
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.ACJ (Oral)
Petitioner-firms is registered as a private limited company and is primarily engaged in carrying out research and development, designing and producing EPDM and Rubber polymer based products for automative sector. Instant petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constituti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Inox Air Products Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Visakhapatnam – GST

M/s Inox Air Products Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Visakhapatnam – GST
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 1408 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 21-5-2018
Appeals No. E/30361 & 30363/2018 – A/30589-30590/2018
Central Excise
Mr. M.V. RAVINDRAN, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri A. Vamsi Rajesh, Chartered Accountant, for the Appellant.
Shri Dass Thavanam, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent.
[Order per: M.V. Ravindran]
These two appeals are directed against Orders-in-Appeal No. VIZ-EXCUS-001-APP-177 & 178-17-18, dated 22.12.2017. Since both these appeals raised a common question of law, hence they are being disposed of by a common order.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records.
3.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ame up before this Bench and Final Order dated A/31276/2017 dated 17.08.2017, the Bench recorded and reproduced the findings of the other case laws held in favour of the appellant and submits that subsequently also, in Final Order No. A/31455-31460/2017 dated 07.09.2017 and Final Order No. A/30405/2018 dated 08.02.2018, the appeals are allowed.
5. Learned Departmental Representative submits that Division Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s I.B.P. Company Ltd., Vs. CCE & ST, Raipur [2016 (1) TMI 1313-CESTATNew Delhi] has taken a different view and following the decision in the case of Navbharat Explosive Co. Ltd., in an identical set of facts held that recovery of Modvat credit has to be undertaken under Rule 57(I) and the sam

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Dhuleva Industries Versus CCE &GST, Udaipur

M/s Dhuleva Industries Versus CCE &GST, Udaipur
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 5 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 21-5-2018
Ex. Appeal No. 51022 of 2018 – A/52010/2018-EX[DB]
Central Excise
Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) And Ms. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial)
Sh. B. L. Yadav, Advocate for the appellant
Sh. U. Sengraj, AR for the Respondent
ORDER
Per: V. Padmanabhan:
The present appeal has been filed against the Order-in-Appeal JAI-EXCUS-001-APP-073-2018 dated 02.02.2018.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants has established their factory in the State of Rajasthan and were operating under Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme which was notified by the Government of Rajasthan with the objective of facilitating investment in the establishment of new enterprises under the various schemes of Rajasthan Government. The appellants (assessees) were eligible for subsidies as per the various schemes applicable to the assess

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the identical issue has come up before the Tribunal in the case of Shree Cements Ltd. V/s CCE, Alwar 2018-TIOL-748-CESTAT-DEL where it was observed that:-
7. We have heard both sides at length and perused the appeal record. As out lined above, the appellants are covered by the Investment Promotion Schemes of the Rajasthan Government. In terms of the various schemes of the Rajasthan Government, the appellants are required to discharge their VAT liability by making payment of the same. Out of such VAT credited to the Government, a certain portion is disbursed back to them in the form of subsidies. Such disbursement happens in the form of VAT 37 B, challan which can be utilized in subsequent periods to discharge VAT liability. The crux of the dispute in the present case is whether such subsidy amounts are required to be included in the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the appellants, in terms of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. As per the concept of transaction value out

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

saction value.
9. In the present case we know that for the initial period the assessees are required to remit the VAT recovered by them at the time of sale of the goods manufactured. A part of such VAT is given back to them in the form of subsidy in Challan 37 B. Such Challans are as good as cash but can be used only for payment of VAT in the subsequent period. In terms of the scheme of the Government of Rajasthan payment of VAT using such Challan are considered legal payments of tax. In view of the above, Revenue is not correct in taking the view that VAT liability discharged by utilizing such subsidy challans cannot be taken as VAT actually paid.
10. It is pertinent to reproduce the observations of the Tribunal in the Welspun Corporation Ltd. case
“5.1 The Respondent company opted for “Remission of Tax Scheme” and was thus eligible for the Capital subsidy in the form of remission of Sales Tax subject to the conditions to be fulfilled…. The subsidy in the form of remission of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Daido India Pvt. Limited Versus CCE &CGST, Alwar

M/s Daido India Pvt. Limited Versus CCE &CGST, Alwar
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 6 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 21-5-2018
Ex. Appeal No. 50993 of 2018 – A/52009/2018-EX[DB]
Central Excise
Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) And Ms. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial)
Sh. B. L. Yadav, Advocate for the appellant
Sh. U. Sengraj, AR for the Respondent
ORDER
Per: V. Padmanabhan:
The present appeal has been filed against the Order-in-Appeal 34(SM)CE/JPR/2018 dated 02.02.2018.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant has established their factory in the State of Rajasthan and were operating under Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme which was notified by the Government of Rajasthan with the objective of facilitating investment in the establishment of new enterprises under the various schemes of Rajasthan Government. The appellants (assessees) were eligible for subsidies as per the various schemes applicable to the assesses a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

identical issue has come up before the Tribunal in the case of Shree Cements Ltd. V/s CCE, Alwar 2018-TIOL-748-CESTAT-DEL where it was observed that:-
7. We have heard both sides at length and perused the appeal record. As out lined above, the appellants are covered by the Investment Promotion Schemes of the Rajasthan Government. In terms of the various schemes of the Rajasthan Government, the appellants are required to discharge their VAT liability by making payment of the same. Out of such VAT credited to the Government, a certain portion is disbursed back to them in the form of subsidies. Such disbursement happens in the form of VAT 37 B, challan which can be utilized in subsequent periods to discharge VAT liability. The crux of the dispute in the present case is whether such subsidy amounts are required to be included in the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the appellants, in terms of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. As per the concept of transaction value outlin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ction value.
9. In the present case we know that for the initial period the assessees are required to remit the VAT recovered by them at the time of sale of the goods manufactured. A part of such VAT is given back to them in the form of subsidy in Challan 37 B. Such Challans are as good as cash but can be used only for payment of VAT in the subsequent period. In terms of the scheme of the Government of Rajasthan payment of VAT using such Challan are considered legal payments of tax. In view of the above, Revenue is not correct in taking the view that VAT liability discharged by utilizing such subsidy challans cannot be taken as VAT actually paid.
10. It is pertinent to reproduce the observations of the Tribunal in the Welspun Corporation Ltd. case
“5.1 The Respondent company opted for “Remission of Tax Scheme” and was thus eligible for the Capital subsidy in the form of remission of Sales Tax subject to the conditions to be fulfilled…. The subsidy in the form of remission of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : BASF India Limited

In Re : BASF India Limited
GST
2018 (7) TMI 53 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 396 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 21-5-2018
GST-ARA- 27/2017-18/B-36
GST
B.V. Borhade Joint Commissioner of State Tax  and Pankaj Kumar Joint Commissioner of Central Tax
 
PROCEEDINGS
(under clause (xviii) of section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods with section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under clause (xviii) of section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the IGST Act” ] read with section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the same except for certain provisons. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisons, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provison under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provison under the CGST Act / MGST Act would be mentioned as being under the “GST Act”.
02.  FACTS AND CONTENTION – AS PER THE APPLICANT
The submissions, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
  “STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS HAVING A BEARING ON THE OUESTION(S) ON WHICH ADVANCE RULING IS REQURED.
1. BASF India Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Applicant) having its corporate head office at, 3rd Floor, Shree Sawan Knowledge Park, Plot No D 507, MIDC, Turbhe, Navi Mumbai, India-400 705, is a subsidiary of BASF Germany and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of, inter alia, chemicals and allied products.
2. The Applicant was regi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s. The export documents such as the Bill of Lading will show the Applicant as the buyer of the goods.
e)  Before the goods cross the customs frontier of India and is entered for customs clearance, the goods in question will be sold by the Applicant to its customer who are known to them;
f) The sale will be effected by executing an agreement of sale (known as high sea sale agreement) and by endorsing the bill of lading in the name of the end customer Sale invoice indicating the price at which goods are sold by the Applicant to the end customer will also be issued;
g)  Therefore, the sale of goods will be by the Applicant to their customers who were identified at the time of placing order on the overseas related party.
h)  The Import General Manifest ('IGM') will be filed in the name of the end customer (final buyer) by the shipping line.
i)  Thereafter, the Bill of Entry will be tiled by the end customer who will discharge the applicable duties of custom

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oms becomes payable in terms of Section 12 of the Customs Act and the said IGST would be levied in terms of Section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (Customs Tariff Act)
8. However, the sale transaction by the Applicant to the customer also qualifies as an inter-state supply of goods in terms of section 7 of the IGST Act. Therefore, as as this sale is concerned, a question is arising as to whether the said sale of goods will amount to a supply subject to levy of IGST under the IGST Act, when the same goods will once again be subject to a levy of IGST under Section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act at the time of importation into India
STATMENT CONTAINING APPLICANT'S INTERPRETATION OF LAW AND/OR FACTS, AS THE CASE MAY BE  IN RESPECT OF QUESTION(S) ON WHICH ADVANCE RULING IS REQUIRED.
A. APPLICANT'S ELIGIBILITY TO FILE PRESENT ADVANCE RULING APPLICATION.
A.1 Sub-section (c) of Section 95 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) classification of any goods or services or both;
(b) applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act;
(c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both;
(d) admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid;
(e) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both;
(f) whether applicant is required to be registered;
(g) whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of that term.”
 …Emphasis Supplied
Thus, as per the said section, advance ruling may be sought by the Applicant on the questions concerning determination of the liability to pay tax on goods or services or both and on the eligibility to avail input tax credit. The Applicant submits that the questions for determination in the instant advance ruling application concern (a) admissibilit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

visions of sub-section (2), there shall be levied a tax called the integrated goods and services tax on all inter-State supplies of goods or services or both, except on the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption, on the value determined under section 15 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and at such rates, not exceeding forty per cent., as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council and collected in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be paid by the taxable person:
Provided that the integrated tax on goods imported into India shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975.) on the value as determined under the said Act at the point when duties of customs are levied on the said goods under section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962. (52 of 1962.)
7. Inter-State supply. – (1) Subject to the provisions of section 10, supply of goods, where the location of the supplier a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act.
C.5  In the instant scenario, the imported goods will be sold by the Applicant to its end-customer before the goods are entered for customs clearance. This leg of the transaction will also qualify as an inter-state supply in terms of Section 7 of the IGST Act. Therefore, the essential question is whether this sale of goods happening before the goods are entered for customs clearance will be subject to a levy of IGST in terms of the provisons of the IGST Act.
C.6  It is submitted by the Applicant that from a combined reading of Section 5(1) and the proviso to Section 5(1) of the IGST Act, it is evident that IGST on imported goods will be leviable only at the time of importation and at the point when duty of customs under Customs Act is leviable. Therefore, it is submitted that levying IGST once again on sale transactions which have happened prior to the importation of the same goods, does not arise.
C. 7 This view of the Applicant has als

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er-state transactions are subject to IGST. High sea sales of imported goods are akin to inter-state transactions. Owing to this, it was presented to the Board as to whether the high sea sales of imported goods would be chargeable to IGST twice i.e. at the time of Customs clearance under sub-section (7) of section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and also separately under Section 5 of The Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
4. GST council has deliberated the levy of Integrated Goods and Services Tax on high sea sales in the case of imported goods. The council has decided that IGST on high sea sale (s) transactions of imported goods, whether one or multiple, shall be levied and collected only at the time of importation i.e. when the import declarations are filed before the Customs authorities for the customs clearance purposes for the first time. Further, value addition accruing in each such high sea sale shall form part of the value on which IGST is collected at the time of clear

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Difficulties, in the implementation of this circular may be brought to the knowledge of the Board.
….Emphasis Supplied
C.8 Thus, the above circular also affirms the view that high sea sale of goods in the course of import into India will not qualify as a supply subject to a levy of IGST Only at the time of importation, at the point where the goods are entered for customs clearance will IGST be levied. Therefore, the question of levying IGST on high sea sale of goods before they are entered for customs clearance does not arise, In other words, IGST will be leviable only at the point of importation of goods into India and therefore only once.
C.9  In view of the above, it is submitted that no IGST will be leviable on the sale of goods made by the Applicant to its end customer. IGST will be payable only at the time of import and the same will be discharged by the customer at the point when duties of customs will be levied.
D.  INPUT TAX CREDIT OF THE INPUTS INPUT SERVICE

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

id taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies.
Section 2(47) of the CGST Act, defines the term “exempt supply” as under:
“2(47) exempt supply” means supply of any goods or services or both which attracts nil rate of tax or which may be wholly exempt from tax under section 11, or under section 6 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, and includes non-taxable supply;”
D3. Section 17 of the CGST, Act states that credit shall be restricted only to so much of input tax as is attributable to taxable supplies including zero-rates supplies. In other words, input tax credit as is attributable to exempt supplies will have to be reversed.
D.4  As per Section 2(47) of the CGST Act, an exempt supply is that –
(i)  which attracts nil rate of tax; or
(ii) which may be wholly exempt from under Section 11; or
(iii) wholly exempt from Tax under Section 6 of the IGST Act; or
(iv) a non -taxable supply
D.5 In terms of Section 2(79) of the CGST Act, a 'non-taxable suppl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lained in the above para D, the said supply will not qualify as an exempt supply falling within the purview of the  provisons of the IGST Act/CGST Act and thus, ITC reversal will not be required under the provisons of the same.”
03.  CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
“Question – 1 
As Per Proviso to Section 5 of IGST Act regarding levy and collection of-tax which reads as
“Provided that the integrated tax on goods imported into India shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975.) on the value as determined under the said Act at the point when duties of customs are levied on the said goods under section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962. (52 of 1962.)”.
The same issue was deliberated by GST council vide circular no.33/2017-cus vide Para-4 which reads as
“The council has decided that IGST on high sea sale (s) transactions of impo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rtly for effecting exempt supplies under the said Acts, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the said taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies.
Section 2(47) of the CGST Act, defines the term “exempt supply” as under:
*2(47) exempt supply” means supply of any goods or services or both which attracts nil rate of tax or which may be wholly exempt from tax under section 11, or under section 6 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, and includes non-taxable supply;”
If the above transaction is not subjected to the levy of [GST then the same will be treated as an exempt supply for the purpose of  Section 17 of the CGST Act and input tax credit will have to be reversed, to the extent of inputs, Input services and common input services used by the Applicant.”
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for preliminary hearing on dt.27.03.2018 with respect to admission or rejection of the application when Sh. R. Nambirajan (Advo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d from the applicant's customers in India. It will be a back to back purchase order.
* As against the purchase order, the overseas party will export the products. The export documents such as the Bill of Lading will show the applicant as the buyer of the goods.
* Before the goods cross the customs frontier of India and is entered for customs clearance, the goods in question will be sold by the applicant to its customer who are known to them.
* The sale will be effected by executing a high sea sale agreement and by endorsing the bill of lading in the name of the end customer Sale invoice indicating the price at which goods are sold by the Applicant to the end customer will also be issued;
* The sale of goods will be by the applicant to their customers who were identified at the time of placing order on the overseas related party,
* The Import General Manifest will be filed in the name of the end customer (final buyer) by the shipping line
* The Bill of Entry will be fil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ll the said goods to M/s. XYZ Lid. on high sea sales.
Details
2. Payment
The buyer agrees to make payment for the goods by the seller on High Sea through advance cheque.
3. Delivery
The seller will transfer the rights Title of the goods to the buyer by endorsing the Bill of Lading in favour the buyer after realization of the cheque.
4. Freight & Insurance
a) Freight
Considering the fact, that current shipment is on Ex-works terms, the seller shall be responsible for the payment of insurance with respect to this High Sea Sales.
b) Insurance
Considering the fact. that current shipment is on Ex-works terms, the seller shall be responsible for the payment of freight other related expenses with respect to this high sea sales.
5. Customs Clearance
In view of disposal of goods on high sea sales basis and transfer of title by the seller in favour of the buyer, the buyer shall arrange clearance of goods from Customs at its sole risk and responsibilities. The buyer shall be responsib

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Freight
 
3.
Insurance
 
4.
Consideration
 
This amount shall present the entire amount payable by the buyer to the seller and shall include all cost of the seller.
 
The Bill of Lading and draft invoices raised in the transactions have details thus –
* Bill of Lading
Consignor – BASF (Malaysia), Sdn. Bhd.
Consignee (not negotiable unless consigned to order) – BASF India Limited, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra
Notify address (Carrier not responsible for failure to notify, see clause 20(1 ) hereof): XYZ Ltd.
Port of lading – Hamburg
Port of Discharge – Nhava Sheva
One original Bill of Lading, duly endorsed must be surrendered by the Merchant to the Carrier in exchange for the Good or delivery order in accepting this Bill of Lading the Merchant expressly accepts and agrees to all its terms and conditions whether printed, stamped or written, or otherwise Incorporated notwithstanding the non-signing of this Bill of Lading by the Merchant.
* Draft bill rai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IV DETERMINATION OF NATURE OF SUPPLY
Inter-State supply
7. (1) Subject to the provisions of section 10, supply of goods, where the location of the supplier and the place of supply are in
(a) two different States;
(b) two different Union territories; or
(c) a State and a Union territory,
shall be treated as a supply of goods in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.
(2) Supply of goods imported into the territory of India, till they cross the customs frontiers of India, shall be treated to be a supply of goods in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.
Intra-State supply.
8. (1) Subject to the provisions of section 10, supply of goods where the location of the supplier and the place of supply of goods are in the same State or same Union territory shall be treated as intra-State supply:
Provided that the following supply of goods shall not be treated as intra-State supply, namely:
(i) supply of goods to or by a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r Section 7(2) of the IGST Act
Now when we are clear that the sale on high seas of these goods are in the nature of inter-state sales, the liability to tax in respect of these goods would be as per Section 5 of the IGST Act which reads as under:-
CHAPTER III LEVY AND COLLECTION OF TAX
Levy and collection.
5. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), there shall be levied a tax called the integrated goods and services tax on all inter-State supplies of goods or services or both, except on the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption, on the value determined under section 15 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and at such rates, not exceeding forty per cent., as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council and collected in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be paid by the taxable person:
Provided that the integrated tax on goods imported into India shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

upplier, who is not registered, to a registered person shall be paid by such person on reverse charge basis as the recipient and all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such recipient as if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such goods or services or both.
(5) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, specify categories of services, the tax on inter-State supplies of which shall be paid by the electronic commerce operator if such services are supplied through it, and all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such electronic commerce operator as if he is the supplier liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such services:
Provided that where an electronic commerce operator does not have a physical presence in the taxable territory, any person representing such electronic commerce operator for any purpose in the taxable territory shall be liable to pay tax:
Provided further that where an ele

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onsidered to be imported into India only after they clear the customs frontier after compliance of applicable procedures and payment of duty as applicable.
Thus as per Section 7(2) of the IGST Act and proviso to Section 5(1) of the IGST Act it is very clear that in respect of import goods there is no levy and collection except in accordance with the provisons of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 provides that custom duties which includes integrated tax in respect of imported goods would be levied only at the time of import or export of goods.
Thus in case of goods sold on high seas sale basis there is no levy till the time of their customs clearance in compliance with Section 12 of the Customs Act and Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act. In view of this the import goods sold on high seas sale basis, though they are clearly in the nature of inter-state supply would come in the category of “exempt supp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

till the time of customs clearance in accordance with and compliance of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 3 of the Customs Tariff act, 1975.
We find that the above legal position is further reiterated and confirmed by Circular No. 3/1/2018 – IGST dated 25.05.2018 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, GST Policy Wing.
Question 2
Whether input tax credit will have to be reversed, to the extent of inputs, input services and common input services used by the Applicant, in case the above transaction is not subjected to the levy of IGST by treating the same as an exempt supply for the purpose of Section 17 of the CGST Act?
Yes. In view of the detailed discussions and observations in respect of Question I above, the goods sold on High Seas sale basis being non-taxable supply as per Section 2(78) of the CGST Act and being exempt supply as per Section 2(47) of the CGST Act, the input tax credit to the extent of inputs, input services and common input servi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
G.S.R.29/P.A.5/2017/S.164/Amd.(12)/2018 Dated:- 21-5-2018 Punjab SGST
GST – States
Punjab SGST
Punjab SGST
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE AND TAXATION
(EXCISE AND TAXATION-II BRANCH)
NOTIFICATION
The 21st May, 2018
No. G.S.R.29/P.A.5/2017/S.164/Amd.(12)/2018.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Punjab Act No.5 of 2017), and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Governor of Punjab, on the recommendations of the Council, is pleased to make the following rules further to amend the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
RULES
1. (1) These rules may be called t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

quantity and description of goods where the goods are sent by one job worker to another or are returned to the principal:
Provided further that the challan endorsed by the job worker may be further endorsed by another job worker, indicating therein the quantity and description of goods where the goods are sent by one job worker to another or are returned to the principal.”.
3. In the said rules, in rule 127, in clause (iv), after the words “to furnish a performance report to the Council by the tenth”, the word “day” shall be inserted.
4. In the said rules, in rule 129, in sub-rule (6), for the words “as allowed by the Standing Committee”, the words “as may be allowed by the Authority” shall be substituted.
5. In the said rules, in rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

members of the Authority shall constitute quorum at its meetings.
(2) If the Members of the Authority differ in their opinion on any point, the point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the members present and voting, and in the event of equality of votes, the Chairman shall have the second or casting vote.”
7. In the said rules, after rule 137, in the Explanation, in clause (c), after sub-clause (b), the following sub-clause shall be inserted, namely: –
“c. any other person alleging, under sub-rule (1) of rule 128, that a registered person has not passed on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax on any supply of goods or services or the benefit of input tax credit to the recipient by way of commensurate red

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appoint the 1st day of April, 2018, as the date from which the provisions of rule 138, 138-A, 138-B, 138-C, 138-D and forms GST EWB-01, GST EWB-02, GST EWB-03, GST EWB-04 and GST INV-1.

Appoint the 1st day of April, 2018, as the date from which the provisions of rule 138, 138-A, 138-B, 138-C, 138-D and forms GST EWB-01, GST EWB-02, GST EWB-03, GST EWB-04 and GST INV-1.
S.O.73/P.A.5/2017/S.164/2018 Dated:- 21-5-2018 Punjab SGST
GST – States
Punjab SGST
Punjab SGST
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE AND TAXATION
(EXCISE AND TAXATION-II BRANCH)
NOTIFICATION
The 21st May, 2018
No. S.O.73/P.A.5/2017/S.164/2018.- In exercise of the powers conferred by secti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE : BHARAT AGRO

IN RE : BHARAT AGRO
GST
2018 (10) TMI 305 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – UTTAR PRADESH – 2018 (17) G.S.T.L. 55 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – UTTAR PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 21-5-2018
Order No. 5
GST
Shri Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Member (State Tax) and Dinesh Kumar, Member (Central Tax)

ORDER

=============
Document 1
[Order per : Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Member (State Tax)]. – à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¦Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¯

à¤Å“à¥â‚¬.एस.टà¥â‚¬. à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â®, 2017 तथा à¤â€°. प्र. à¤Å“à¥â‚¬.एस.टà¥â‚¬. à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â®, 2017 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬ धारा-98 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡

à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤â€”त à¤â€¦Ã Â¤â€”्रिम विनिर्णय हà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥Â दाà¤â€“िल प्रश्à

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¤ प्रतिनिधि à¤â€°Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¥Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¤ हुए,

à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ द्वारा à¤â€¦Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤â€”त à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤â€”या à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿ à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬ à¤â€¡Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Ë† द्वारा Pineapple à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬ à¤â€“रà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¦ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¸Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬

सफाà¤Ë† à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€°Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤â€šà¤¤ à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¸Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€”à¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â²Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â° Slices तà¥Ë†à¤¯à¤¾à¤° à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â à¤Å“ातà¥â€¡ हà¥Ë†à¤â€š, à¤Å“िन्हà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š पà¤â€šà¤š à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ 80°-85° C

तापमान पर Sugar Syrup मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š रà¤â€“ा à¤Å“ाता हà¥Ë† à¤

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â¾ हà¥Ë†à¥¤ à¤â€°Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¥Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¤ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥Æâ€™Ã Â¤Â¤ प्रतिनिधि द्वारा बताया à¤â€”या à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿

à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¸ प्रà¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š Pineapple à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾ मà¥â€šà¤² स्वरà¥â€šà¤ª परिवर्तित न हà¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â£ यह Fresh Pineap

ple à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬ भाँति हà¥â‚¬ प्रयà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€” à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤Å“ाता हà¥Ë†à¥¤ à¤â€°Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¥Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¤ प्रतिनिधि द्वारा यह भà¥â‚¬ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤â€”त à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ Ã

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-6-2017 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ तहत à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤ हà¥Ë†à¥¤ à¤â€°Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¥Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¤
Document 2
à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥Æâ€™Ã Â¤Â¤ द्वारा à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬ à¤â€¡Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Ë† मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š हà¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥â€¡ वालà¥â‚¬ प्रà¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ वà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¡Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¥â€¹ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ माध्यम सà¥â€¡ प्रदर्शित à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾

à¤â€”या। Pineapple à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ Sugar Syrup मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š पà¥Ë†à¤â€¢ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â à¤Å“ानà¥â€¡ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬ प्रà¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ निम्न प्रà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â° हà¥Ë†

Pineapple slices in syrup

Process flowchart

Ingredients : Pi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¿Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿ द्वारा Deputy Commis-

sioner, Sales Tax v. Pio Food Packers on 9 May, 1980 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ वाद मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š माननà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¯ सर्वà¥â€¹Ã Â¤Å¡Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¡

न्यायालय द्वारा पारित निर्णय एवà¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¦Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¯ à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¦ शुल्à¤â€¢ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â£ द्वारा à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Ë† à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¯ मामलà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š

पारित निर्णयà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ सà¤â€šà¤¦à¤°à¥à¤­à¤¿à¤¤ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤â€”या ।

4. à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¦Ã

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ªÃ Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â·Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸Ã Â¤Â¿ सà¥â€¡ स्पष्ट हà¥Ë† à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â¿ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤Â² fresh Pineapple à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ सà¤â€šà¤¬à¤â€šà¤§ मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š

लाà¤â€”à¥â€š हà¥Ë†à¥¤ à¤â€ Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¦Ã Â¤â€¢ द्वारा à¤â€¦Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¥â‚¬ à¤Å“ा रहà¥â‚¬ प्रà¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š Fresh Pineapppe à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ Peeling, Cut-

ting, Washing, Steaming/Cooking e Cooling 3d Airtight Container #

Sugar Syrup à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ साथ पà¥Ë†à¤â€¢ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤Å“ाता हà¥Ë†à¥¤ à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¸ प्रà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â° à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¸ पà¥â€šà¤°à¥â‚¬ प्रà¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ सà¥â€¡ प्रा

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

other parts of Plants

Tariff

Description of goods

Item

(1)

2008

(2)

2008 11 00

Fruit, nuts and other edible parts of plants, otherwise pre-

pared or preserved, whether or not containing added sugar or

other sweetening matter or spirit, not elsewhere specified or

included

– Nuts, ground-nuts other seeds, whether or not mixed together:

Ground-nuts…

–

2008 19

–

2008 19 10

–

Other, including mixtures:

Cashew nut, roasted, salted or roasted and salted.

2008 19 20 – Other roasted nuts and seeds…

noites 2008 19 30 – Other nuts, otherwise prepared [or] preserved.

2008 19 40 – Other roasted and fried vegetable products

2008 19 90 – Other…

2008 20 00 – Pineapples.

7.

à¤â€°Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤ तालिà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾ सà¥â€¡ स्पष्ट हà¥Ë† à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿ “Canned Pineapple Slices, dipped in

sugar syrup” Tariff Item No. 2008 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€¦Ã Â

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

:-

S.

Chap-

Description of Goods

8.

No. ter/Heading/

Sub-heading/

Tariff item

40. 2008

abood

|Fruit, nuts and other edible parts of plants, other

wise prepared or preserved, whether or not contain-

ing added sugar or other sweetening matter or spir-

it, not elsewhere specified or included; such as

|ground-nuts, cashew nut, roasted, salted or roasted

and salted, other roasted nuts and seeds, squash of

| mango, lemon, orange, pineapple or other fruits

à¤â€°Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤ समस्त तथ्यà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š सà¥â€¡ यह स्पष्ट हà¥Ë† à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿ à¤â€ Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¦Ã Â¤â€¢ द्वारा सà¤â€šà¤¦à¤°à¥à¤­à¤¿à¤¤ न्यायिà¤â€¢

निर्णयà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ तथ्य प्रश्नà¤â€”à¤

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

 Â¤Â¯

9. “Canned Pineapple Slices, dipped in sugar syrup” Tariff Item No.

2008 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤â€”त à¤â€ Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥â€¡ हà¥Ë†à¤â€š तथा à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨ पर à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¦Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â° सरà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â° द्वारा à¤Å“ारà¥â‚¬ विà¤Å“्ञप्ति सà¤â€š. 01/2017-C.T.

(Rate) दिनाà¤â€šà¤â€¢ 28-6-2017 (यथा सà¤â€šà¤¶à¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¤) तथा à¤â€°Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥Â¦ राà¤Å“्य सरà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â° द्वारा à¤Å“ारà¥â‚¬ विà¤Å“्ञप्ति सà¤â€š.

KANI-2-836/XI-9(47)/17-U.P. Act-1-2017-Order – (06)-2017 दिनाà¤â€šà¤â€¢ 30-6-2017 (यथा

सà¤â€šà¤¶à¥â€¹Ã Â

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Multiwyn Foams Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commr. of CGST & C. Ex., Howrah

M/s Multiwyn Foams Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commr. of CGST & C. Ex., Howrah
Central Excise
2018 (12) TMI 847 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 21-5-2018
Ex. Appeal No.76045/18 – FO/76576/2018
Central Excise
SHRI P. K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Shri S.P. Siddhanta, Consultant for the Appellant (s)
Shri S. S. Chattopadhyay, Supdt. (A.R.) for the Revenue
ORDER
Per Shri P.K. Choudhary:
This appeal is filed by the appellant against the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.422/HWH/CE/2017-18 dated 18.12.2017 passed by Commr. of CGST & C.Ex. (Appeals), Kolkata.
2. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records.
3. I find that the only dispute in the present appeal is regarding Cenvat credit availed on the service tax paid by the appellants in respect of the services received by them from the various transporters towards outward transportation of excisable goods from the appellant's factory to the buyer's premises (carriage outwards) during the period 2006-200

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7. Having regard to the definition of 'input service' that was prevailing at the relevant time i.e. prior to April 1, 2008, the aforesaid contention of the Department cannot be accepted. As per the said definition, service used by the manufacturer of clearance of final products 'from the place of removal' to the warehouse or customer's place etc., was exigible for Cenvat credit. This stands finally decided in Civil Appeal No. 11710 of 2016 (Commissioner of Central Excise Belgaum v. M/s. Vasavadatta Cements Ltd.) vide judgment dated January 17, 2018. The matter is squarely covered by the Board's Circular dated August 23, 2007, relevant portion whereof is as under:
“ISSUE: Up to what stage a manufacturer/consignor can take credit on the service tax paid on goods transport by road?
COMMENTS: This issue has been examined in great detail by the CESTAT in the case of M/s. Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. v. CCE, Ludhiana [2007 (6) S.T.R. 249 Tri-D]. In this case, CESTAT has made the follow

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of M/s. Ultratech Cements Ltd. v. CCE, Bhavnagar – 2007-TIOL-429-CESTAT-AHM, it was held that after the final products are cleared from the place of removal, there will be no scope of subsequent use of service to be treated as input. The above observations and views explain the scope of the relevant provisions clearly, correctly and in accordance with the legal provisions. In conclusion, a manufacturer/consignor can take credit on the service tax paid on outward transport of goods up to the place of removal and not beyond that.
In this connection, the 8.2 phrase 'place of removal' needs determination taking into account the facts of an individual case and the applicable provisions. The phrase 'place of removal' has not been defined in Cenvat Credit Rules. In terms of sub-rule (t) of Rule 2 of the said rules, if any words or expressions are used in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and are not defined therein but are defined in the Central Excise Act, 1944 or the Finance Act, 1994, they

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rom where the excisable goods are sold, after their clearance from the factory), the determination of the 'place of removal' does not pose much problem. However, there may be situations where the manufacturer/consignor may claim that the sale has taken place at the destination point because in terms of the sale contract/agreement (i) the ownership of goods and the property in the goods remained with the seller of the goods till the delivery of the goods in acceptable condition to the purchaser at his door step; (ii) the seller bore the risk of loss of or damage to the goods during transit to the destination; and (iii) the freight charges were an integral part of the price of goods. In such cases, the credit of the service tax paid on the transportation up to such place of sale would be admissible if it can be established by the claimant of such credit that the sale and the transfer of property in goods (in terms of the definition as under section 2 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as al

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST -Provisional User Id -Deactivation/Cancellation

GST -Provisional User Id -Deactivation/Cancellation
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kanhu Padhy Dated:- 20-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 21-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
This is an issue of User Id Cancellation/de-activation from accessing of GST Common Portal.
It has been seen that some of the companies/traders/vendors/enterprises might not in a position to submit the REG-26 Form for the migration purpose.
In the consequence, those owners/representatives of the firms are not in a position to submit further monthly returns like, GSTR-1, 2,, & 3, 3B,. etc. due to the None-availability of access to the GST portal for submission of taxes which were/are due .
In this context, I would like to draw the attention of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =