Export of Goods and Services

FEMA – 036/2001 – Dated:- 27-2-2001 – Export of Goods and Services RESERVE BANK OF INDIA(EXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENT)CENTRAL OFFICEMUMBAI 400 001 Notification No. FEMA 36 /2001-RB. Dated February 27, 2001 Published in the Official Gazette of Government of India – Extraordinary – Part-II, Section 3, Sub-Section (i) dated 21.03.2001 – G.S.R. No.199(E) In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (3) of Section, 7, sub-section (2) of Section 47 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and in partial modification of its Notification No. FEMA 23/2000-RB dated 3rd May 2000, Reserve Bank of India makes the following amendments in the Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods and Services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Zones, under intimation to the Development Commissioner of Special Economic Zones / concerned Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner of Customs, (c) after clause (j), the following clauses shall be inserted, namely:- (k) goods sent outside India for testing subject to re-import into India; (l) defective goods sent outside India for repair and re-import provided the foods are accompanied by a certificate from an authorised dealer in India that the export is for repair and re-import and that the export does not involve any transaction in foreign exchange. (m) exports permitted by the Reserve Bank, on application made to it, subject to the terms and conditions, if any, as stipulated in the permission. (ii) in Regulation 6 of the said Re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

been made by a unit situated in a Special Economic Zone, then notwithstanding anything contained in sub-regulation (I), the amount representing the full export value of goods or software shall be realised and repatriated to India within twelve months from the date of export. Provided that the Reserve Bank may for a sufficient and reasonable cause shown, extend the said period of twelve months. (b) The Reserve Bank may for reasonable and sufficient cause direct that the unit shall cease to be governed by sub-regulation (2); Provided that no such direction shall be given unless the unit has been given a reasonable opportunity to make a representation in the matter. (c) On such direction, the unit shall be governed by the provisions of sub-reg

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 – Export of Goods and Services

FEMA – 012 – Dated:- 9-9-2000 – Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 – Export of Goods and Services RESERVE BANK OF INDIAEXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENTCENTRAL OFFICEMUMBAI-400 001 A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.12 September 9, 2000 To All Authorised Dealers in Foreign Exchange Dear Sirs, Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 – Export of Goods and Services Attention of authorised dealers is invited to the Notification No. FEMA 23/ 2000-RB dated 3rd May, 2000, issued by Reserve Bank in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1), sub-section (3) of Section 7 and sub-section (2) of Section 47 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999), under which the Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods and Services) Regulations, 2000 have been made. Synopsis of these Regulations have already been advised vide Annexure III to A.D. (M.A. Series) Circular No 11 dated May 16, 2000. The Annexure attached to this circular contains detailed directions relating to dealin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ted to issue guarantees on behalf of exporter clients on account of exports out of India. 5. Export of goods and services against repayment of state credits granted by erstwhile Soviet Union will continue to be governed by the extant directions issued by Reserve Bank, as amended from time to time. Further, Reserve Bank will continue to consider as hitherto, counter trade proposals from Indian exporters with Romania involving adjustment of value of exports from India against value of imports made into India in terms of a voluntarily entered arrangement between the concerned parties. 6. It is further clarified that the Directions contained in the Annexureshould be read with the Regulations notified by the Reserve Bank vide its Notification No. FEMA 23/2000 -RB dated 3rd May 2000, referred to above. 7. Authorised dealers may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents, concerned. 8. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under Section 10(4)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or functions unless otherwise indicated. If for any particular reason, a firm or company desires to deal with a different office of the Exchange Control Department, it may approach the office within whose jurisdiction it functions for necessary approval. A.2 Exemptions from Declarations (i) The requirement of declaration of export of goods and software in the prescribed form will not apply to the cases indicated in Regulation No. 4 ibid. The requirement of declaration also shall not apply to goods sent for testing abroad, subject to re-import. (ii) Gift of goods exceeding rupees one lakh in value require approval of the Reserve Bank. (iii) Export of goods not involving any foreign exchange transaction directly or indirectly, requires the waiver of GR/PP procedure from Reserve Bank. A.3 Numbering of forms GR, PP and SOFTEX forms will bear specific identification numbers. In all applications/ correspondence with the Reserve Bank, this identification number should invariably be cited. In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of funds in their Nostro account or on production of a certificate by the exporter from the Credit Card servicing bank in India to the effect that it has received the equivalent amount in foreign exchange, if the authorised dealer concerned is not the Credit Card servicing bank. A.5 Guarantees against Exports Prior approval of Reserve Bank should be obtained by authorised dealers for issue of guarantees in respect of caution-listed exporters. A.6 (i) Foreign Currency Accounts Reserve Bank may consider applications in form EFC from exporters having good track record for opening foreign currency accounts with banks subject to certain terms and conditions. Applications for opening such an account with a branch of an authorised dealer in India may be submitted through the branch at which the foreign currency account is to be maintained. If the foreign currency account is to be maintained abroad the application should be made by the exporter giving details of the bank with which the account

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s party through an Escrow Account opened in India in U.S. dollar will be considered by the Reserve Bank. All imports and exports under the arrangement should be at international prices in conformity with the Exim Policy and Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder. No interest will be payable on balances standing to the credit of the Escrow Account but the funds temporarily rendered surplus may be held in a short-term deposit up to a total period of three months in a year (i.e. in a block of 12 months) and the banks may pay interest at the applicable rate. No fund based / or non-fund based facilities would be permitted against the balances in the Escrow Account. (ii) Application for permission for opening an Escrow Account may be made by the overseas exporter/organisation through the authorised dealer with whom the account is proposed to be opened, to the office of Reserve Bank under whose jurisdiction the authorised dealer is functioning. A.8

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ndia provided that the balance in the account is repatriated to India within a period of one month from the date of closure of the exhibition/trade fair and full details are submitted to the concerned authorised dealer. (ii) Firms/Companies and other organisations participating in Trade Fair/ Exhibition abroad should obtain approval on GR Form from the concerned office of Reserve Bank for export of exhibits and other items for display-cum-sale in the trade fair/exhibition. On closure of the fair/exhibition, they should re-import the exhibits or repatriate the value of goods sold within one month of the closure of the fair/ exhibition and submit necessary documentary evidence to the concerned Regional office of Reserve Bank in support of the re-import or repatriation. A.10 Project Exports and Service Exports (i) Export of engineering goods on deferred payment terms and execution of turnkey projects and civil construction contracts abroad are collectively referred to as Project Exports .

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

posals giving full particulars through their banks to the concerned Regional Office of Reserve Bank for consideration. A.12 Forfaiting Export-Import Bank of India (Exim Bank) and authorised dealers have been permitted to undertake forfaiting, for financing of export receivables. It would be in order for authorised dealers to allow remittance of commitment fee/ service charges, etc. payable by the exporter as approved by the Exim Bank/ the concerned authorised dealer. Such remittance may be permitted in advance in one lumpsum or at monthly intervals as approved by the concerned agency. PART B – GR/PP/SOFTEX PROCEDURE B.1 Disposal of Copies of Export Declaration Forms (i) Copies of export declaration forms should be disposed of as under: (a) GR forms should be completed by the exporter in duplicate and both the copies submitted to the Customs at the port of shipment along with the shipping bill. Customs will give their running serial number on both the copies after admitting the correspo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the GR form. After the documents have been negotiated/sent for collection, the authorised dealer should report the transaction to Reserve Bank in statement ENC under cover of appropriate R-Supplementary Return. The duplicate copy of the form together with a copy of invoice will be retained by the authorised dealer till full export proceeds have been realised and thereafter submitted to Reserve Bank duly certified under cover of appropriate R-Supplementary Return. NOTE: (i) In the case of exports made under deferred credit arrangement or to joint ventures abroad against equity participation or under rupee credit agreement, the number and date of Reserve Bank approval and/or number and date of the relative RBI circular should be recorded at the appropriate place on the GR form. (ii) Where Duplicate copy of GR form is misplaced or lost, authorised dealer may accept another copy of duplicate GR form duly certified by Customs. (c) On account of introduction of Electronic Data Interchange (

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

exporters in respect of exports insured with them and subsequently receives the export proceeds from the buyer/buyer s country through the efforts made by them, the share of exporters in the amount so received is disbursed through the bank which had handled the shipping documents. In such cases, ECGC will issue a certificate to the bank which had handled the relevant shipping documents after full proceeds have been received. The certificate will indicate the number of declaration form, name of the exporter, name of the authorised dealer, date of negotiation, bill number, invoice value and the amount actually received by ECGC. It will be in order for authorised dealers to certify the duplicate GR form/ EC copy of shipping bill on the basis of the certificate issued by ECGC and submit them to Reserve Bank. The certificate issued by ECGC may also be attached to the duplicate GR/SDF/PP form while forwarding them to Reserve Bank. (e) Where a part of export proceeds are credited to EEFC acco

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ure on PP forms PP forms will be presented by the exporter to an authorised dealer for countersignature. Authorised dealers should countersign the PP forms after ensuring that the parcel is being addressed to their branch or correspondent bank in the country of import. The concerned overseas branch or correspondent should be instructed to deliver the parcel to consignee against payment or acceptance of relative bill. Authorised dealers may, however, countersign PP forms covering parcels addressed direct to the consignees, provided (a) an irrevocable letter of credit for the full value of the export has been opened in favour of exporter and has been advised through authorised dealer concerned; or (b) the full value of the shipment has been received in advance by the exporter through an authorised dealer; or (c) the authorised dealer is satisfied, on the basis of the standing and track record of the exporter and the arrangements made for realisation of the export proceeds, that he could

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ne shot operation , the invoice/bill should be raised within 15 days from the date of transmission. (iii) The exporter should submit SOFTEX form to the concerned official of Government of India at STPI/EPZ for valuation/certification not later than 30 days from the date of invoice/the date of last invoice raised in a month, as indicated above. (iv) The invoices raised on overseas clients as at (i) to (iii) above will be subject to valuation of export declared on SOFTEX form by the designated official of Government of India and consequent amendment made in the invoice value, if necessary. B.3.B. Disposal of SOFTEX forms As for disposal of SOFTEX forms the procedure indicated in Regulation 6 of Export Regulations is to be observed. The authorised dealers on receipt of the duplicate copy of the SOFTEX form from the exporter will after full realisation of value declared on the form or as certified by the designated officials (whichever is higher) submit it to Reserve Bank duly certified, u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

shut out, certify copy of the notice as correct and forward it to Reserve Bank together with unused duplicate copy of the GR form. In this case, the original GR form received earlier from Customs will be cancelled. If the shipment is made subsequently, a fresh set of GR form should be completed. B.5 Consolidation of Air Cargo Where air cargo is shipped under consolidation, the airline company s Master Airway Bill will be issued to the Consolidating Cargo Agent who will in turn issue his own House Airway Bills (HAWBs) to individual shippers. Authorised dealers may negotiate HAWBs only if the relative letter of credit specifically provides for negotiation of these documents in lieu of Airway Bills issued by the airline company. B.6 Exports by Barges/Country Craft/Road Transport Following procedure should be adopted by exporters for filing original copies of GR/SDF forms where exports are made to neighbouring countries by road, rail or river transport : a. In case of exports by barges/co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

completed. c. In terms of an agreement on Border Trade between India and Myanmar, exchange of certain specified locally produced commodities, by people living along the India-Myanmar border on both sides under barter trade arrangement as also trade in freely convertible currency, has been permitted as per guidelines issued by Reserve Bank to authorised dealers from time to time. Authorised dealers should follow strictly the guidelines. PART C – Authorised Dealer s Obligation C.1 Delay in Submission of Shipping Documents by Exporters In cases where exporters present documents pertaining to exports after the prescribed period of twenty one days from date of export, authorised dealers may handle them without prior approval of Reserve Bank, provided they are satisfied with the reasons for the delay. C.2 Check-list for Scrutiny of Forms Authorised dealer/exporter should verify the following : i. Authorised dealer should ensure that the number on the duplicate copy of a GR form presented to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rough invoice and the bill. iii. The documents submitted do not reveal any material inter se discrepancies in regard to description of goods exported, export value or country of destination. NOTE: A. The export realisable value may be more than what was originally declared to/accepted by Customs on the GR/SDF form in certain circumstances such as where in c.i.f. or c.&f. contracts, part or whole of any freight increase taking place after the contract was concluded is agreed to be borne by buyers or where as a result of subsequent devaluation of the currency of the contract, buyers have agreed to an increase in price. B. In cases where the documents are being negotiated by a person other than the exporter who has signed GR/PP/SDF/SOFTEX Form in respect of the concerned consignment of export, authorised dealers may negotiate the documents after ensuring compliance with Regulation 12 of Export Regulations . C. In certain lines of export trade, final settlement of price may be dependen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on account of trade discount may be accepted for negotiation or collection only if the discount has been declared by exporter on relative GR/SDF form at the time of shipment and accepted by Customs. C.4 Advance Payments against Exports Exporters may receive advance payments (with or without interest) from their overseas buyers. It should however, be ensured that the shipments made against the advance payments are monitored by the authorised dealer through whom the advance payment is received. The appropriations made against every shipment must be endorsed on the original copy of the inward remittance certificate issued for advance remittance. NOTE : Purchase of foreign exchange from the market for refunding advance payment credited to EEFC account may be allowed only after utilising the entire balances held in the exporter s EEFC accounts maintained at different branches/banks. C.5 Part Drawings In certain lines of export trade, it is the practice to leave a small part of the invoice v

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he bill was initially drawn (excluding undrawn balances) or 90% of the value declared on GR/PP/SDF form, whichever is more and a period of one year has elapsed from the date of shipment. C.6 Consignment Exports i. When goods have been exported on consignment basis, authorised dealer, while forwarding shipping documents to his overseas branch/ correspondent, should instruct the latter to deliver them only against trust receipt/undertaking to deliver sale proceeds by a specified date within the period prescribed for realisation of proceeds of the export. This procedure should be followed even if, according to the practice in certain trades, a bill for part of the estimated value is drawn in advance against the exports. ii. The agents/consignees may deduct from sale proceeds of the goods expenses normally incurred towards receipt, storage and sale of the goods, such as landing charges, warehouse rent, handling charges, etc. and remit the net proceeds to the exporter. iii. The Account Sale

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hes/ correspondents expeditiously, they may despatch shipping documents direct to the consignees or their agents resident in the country of final destination of goods in cases where advance payment or an irrevocable letter of credit has been received for the full value of the export shipment and the underlying sale contract/letter of credit provides for despatch of documents direct to the consignee or his agent resident in the country of final destination of goods. ii. In cases not covered by (i) above also, authorised dealers may accede to the request of the exporter, for despatch of documents for whatever reason, direct to the consignee/agent provided the exporter is a regular customer and the authorised dealer is satisfied, on the basis of standing and track record of the exporter and the arrangements made for realisation of export proceeds, that the request can be acceded to. iii. Documents in respect of goods or software which are accompanied with a declaration by the exporter tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

od of R Supplementary Return with which ENC statement covering the transaction was sent to Reserve Bank and the period of R Supplementary Return with which the duplicate copy of GR/SDF/PP form is submitted to Reserve Bank should be available. ii. Authorised dealers should ensure that all types of export transactions are entered in the Export Bills Register and are given bill numbers on calendar year basis (i.e. January to December). The bill numbers should be recorded in ENC statement and other relevant returns submitted to Reserve Bank. C.10 Follow-up of Overdue Bills i. Authorised dealers should closely watch realisation of bills and in cases where bills remain outstanding, beyond the due date for payment or 6 months from the date of export, the matter should be promptly taken up with concerned exporter. If the exporter fails to arrange for delivery of the proceeds, within six months or seek extension of time beyond six months the matter should be reported to Reserve Bank stating, wh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on in Invoice Value on account ofPrepayment of Usance Bills Occasionally, exporters may approach authorised dealers for reduction in invoice value on account of cash discount to overseas buyers for prepayment of the usance bills. In such cases authorised dealers may allow cash discount to the extent of amount of proportionate interest on the unexpired period of usance, calculated at the rate of interest stipulated in the export contract or at the prime rate/LIBOR of the currency of invoice where rate of interest is not stipulated in the contract. C.12 Reduction in Value If, after a bill has been negotiated or sent for collection, the amount thereof is desired to be reduced for any reason, authorised dealer may approve such reduction, if satisfied about genuineness of the request, provided; a. the reduction does not exceed 10% of invoice value b. it does not relate to an export of i. gold or silver jewellery or articles made out of cut and polished diamonds, ii. commodities subject to f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ceeds have already been realised and repatriated to India and the exporter is not on the caution list of Reserve Bank. In all such cases of remittances, the exporter should be advised to surrender proportionate export incentive, if any, received by him. C.14 Change of Buyer/Consignee Prior approval of Reserve Bank is not required if, after goods have been shipped, they are to be transferred to a buyer other than the original buyer in the event of default by the latter, provided the reduction in value, if any, involved does not exceed 10% and the realisation of export proceeds is not delayed beyond the period of six months from the date of export. Where the reduction in value exceeds 10%, all other relevant conditions stipulated in paragraph C.12 should also be satisfied. C.15 Extension of Time Limit In cases where an exporter has not been able to realise proceeds of a shipment made within the period prescribed (i.e within six months from the date of export), for reasons beyond his cont

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e company c. Place where claim is payable. In cases where claim is payable abroad, authorised dealer must arrange to collect the full amount of claim due on the lost shipment, through the medium of his overseas branch/correspondent and forward the duplicate copy of GR/SDF/PP form to Reserve Bank only after the amount has been collected. A certificate for the amount of claim received should be furnished on the reverse of the duplicate copy. NOTE : Sometimes claims on shipments lost in transit are also partially settled directly by shipping companies/airlines under carriers liability. Authorised dealers should ensure that amounts of such claims if settled abroad are also repatriated to India by exporters. C.17 Payment of Claims by ECGC Where export has been covered by a policy issued by ECGC, settlement of a claim by the Corporation does not absolve the exporter of the statutory obligation undertaken on the GR/SDF/PP form to realise proceeds of the export within prescribed period. In suc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ar; c. Satisfactory documentary evidence is furnished in support of the exporter having made all efforts to realise the dues; d. The case falls under any of the undernoted categories: i. The overseas buyer has been declared insolvent and a certificate from the official liquidator indicating that there is no possibility of recovery of export proceeds produced. ii. The overseas buyer is not traceable over a reasonably long period of time. iii. The goods exported have been auctioned or destroyed by the Port/Customs/Health authorities in the importing country. iv.The unrealised amount represents the balance due in a case settled through the intervention of the Indian Embassy, Foreign Chamber of Commerce or similar Organisation; v. The unrealised amount represents the undrawn balance of an export bill (not exceeding 10% of the invoice value) remained outstanding and turned out to be unrealisable despite all efforts made by the exporter; vi. The cost of resorting to legal action would be dis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uld submit the duplicate thereof to Reserve Bank along with R return, duly certified, as under: Write off of …………………………………………… (Amount in words and figures) permitted in terms of paragraph C.18 of Directions to Authorised Dealers. Date Stamp & Signature of Authorised Dealer C.19 Return of Documents to Exporters The duplicate copies of GR/SDF/PP forms and shipping documents, once submitted to authorised dealers for negotiation, collection, etc, should not ordinarily be returned to exporters, except for rectification of errors and resubmission. C.20 Exporters Caution List Authorised dealers will also be advised whenever exporters are cautioned in terms of provisions contained in Regulation 17 of Export Regulations . Authorised dealers should not accept for negotiation/collection shipping documents covering exports declared on GR/SDF/PP forms completed by such exporters nor countersign PP forms completed by them unless the GR/SDF/PP forms bear approva

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rters, in respect of their exports covered under counter trade arrangement through Escrow Accounts designated in U.S. dollar, subject to the following conditions;- a. The payment of commission satisfies the conditions as at (a) and (b) stipulated in paragraph above. b. The commission is not payable to Escrow Account holders themselves. c. The commission should not be allowed by deduction from the invoice value. NOTE : Payment of commission is prohibited on exports made by Indian partners towards equity participation in an overseas joint venture/wholly owned subsidiary as also exports under Rupee Credit Route. D.2 Refund of Export Proceeds Refund of export proceeds may be allowed by authorised dealers through whom the proceeds were originally received, provided such goods are re-imported into India on account of poor quality etc. and evidence of re-import has been submitted. In all such cases, exporters should be advised to surrender the proportionate incentives availed of, if any, agai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service Tax — Payment by cheque — Delay in encashment beyond due date — No interest/penalty charged

V/DGST/30-Misc-46/2000 Dated:- 23-8-2000 Order-Instruction – Circulars – Service Tax – Service Tax Payment by cheque Delay in encashment beyond due date No interest/penalty charged F. No. V/DGST/30-Misc-46/2000, dated 23-8-2000 of the Mumbai Directorate of Service Tax The Rule 7 of the Central Government Account (Receipts and Payments) Rules, 1983 inter alia provides that Government dues including taxes can be credited by the taxpayers directly into any branch of an authorised Bank. As per Rule 79 of the Treasury Rules of the Central Government, such payments/credits can be made by cheques also. Accordingly, a large number of tax payers including the Service tax assessees discharge their tax liabilities by depositing a cheq

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tice has developed presumably because the Rule 79(1)(a) of the Treasury Rules inter alia states that “, until the cheque is cleared, the Government cannot admit that payment has been received; ” 4. A number of representations have been received in this Directorate stating that recovery of interest and imposition of penalty in the cases where cheques have been deposited before due date and the amount is credited to the Government account in due course, but after the due date, is not fair since the assessee has no control over the time taken by the Bankers of the Government in clearing the cheque. 5. The matter has been examined. 6. It is observed that the identical issue had arisen in case of payment of Inland Air Travel Tax (IATT) by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eemed to have been made on the date when the cheque was handed over to the Government's bankers. Accordingly, the Government set aside the imposition of penalty / interest etc. in the said case. 7. The ratio of above cited decision of the Government would apply mutatis – mutandis to the payment of service tax also. Therefore, it is clarified that in the cases where the service tax amount has been deposited by an assessee in the authorized Bank, by cheque, before the due date and such cheque is not dishonored later, the Department need not initiate proceedings for recovery of interest/penalty etc. However, if the cheque is not honored in due course or the clearance is abnormally delayed for any lapse on the part of the assessees, the Depar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Payment of Service Tax by cheque in authorized Banks-Consequences of delay in encashment beyond due date

V/DGST/ 30-Misc-46/2000 Dated:- 23-8-2000 Order-Instruction – Circulars – Service Tax – DIRECTORATE OF SERVICE TAX, Mumbai F.NO. V/DGST/ 30-Misc-46/2000, Dated 23rd August, 2000 . Payment of Service Tax by cheque in authorized Banks-Consequences of delay in encashment beyond due date The Rule 7 of the Central Government Account (Receipts and Payments) Rules ,1983 interalia provides that Government dues including taxes can be credited by the taxpayers directly into any branch of an authorised Bank. As per Rule 79 of the Treasury Rules of the Central Government, such payments / credits can be mad by cheques also. Accordingly, a large number of tax payers including the Service tax assessees discharge their tax li

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

interest and penalty. This practice has developed presumably because the Rule 79(1) (a) of the Treasury Rules interalia states that “, until the cheque is cleared, the Government cannot admit that payment has been received; ” 4. A number of representations have been received in this Directorate stating that recovery of interest and imposition of penalty in the cases where cheques have been deposited before due date and the amount is credited to the Government account in due course, but after the due date, is 5. The matter has been examined. 6. It is observed that the identical issue had arisen in case of payment of Inland Air Travel Tax (IATT) by Sahara Airlines Ltd. The concerned authorities had imposed penalty and ordered recovery o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bankers. Accordingly, the Government set aside the imposition of penalty / interest etc. in the said case. 7. The ratio of above cited decision of the Government would apply mutatis – mutandis to the payment of service tax also. Therefore, it is clarified that in the cases where the service tax amount has been deposited by an assessee in the authorized Bank, by cheque, before the due date and such cheque is not dishonored later, the Department need not initiate proceedings for recovery of interest /penalty etc. However, if the cheque is not honored in due course or the clearance is abnormally delayed for any lapse on the part of the assessees, the Department would be free to take penal action etc., as deemed fit. 8. The contents of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Export of goods and services against repayment of State Credits granted by erstwhile Soviet Union

FEMA – 004 – Dated:- 15-7-2000 – Export of goods and services against repayment of State Credits granted by erstwhile Soviet Union RESERVE BANK OF INDIAEXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENTCENTRAL OFFICEMUMBAI 400 001 A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.4 July 15, 2000. To All Authorised Dealers in Foreign Exchange Dear Sirs, Export of goods and services against repayment of State Credits granted by erstwhile Soviet Union Attention of authorised dealers is drawn to Annexure I to A.D. (G.P. Series) Circular No.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service tax — Clearing & Forwarding Agents — Certain clarification

V/DGST/21(9)/C&F/2/ 99/10683 Dated:- 6-6-2000 Order-Instruction – Circulars – Service Tax – Service tax Clearing Forwarding Agents Certain clarification F.No. V/DGST/21(9)/C F/2/ 99/10683, dated 6-6-2000 of the Mumbai Directorate of Service Tax The office of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax Cell, Chennai-II Commissionerate, has sought for a clarification, on the applica- bility of Service Tax, for the services rendered by a company/assessee which are as follows :- “The company/assessee owns storage tanks made of mild steel in different parts of India. These tanks are used for storing liquids/ chemicals for which customers pay rents based on the tanks capacity. In addition there are pipelines, valves, pumps

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service tax — Clearing & Forwarding Agents — Certain clarification

V/DGST……./2/99/10683 Dated:- 6-6-2000 Order-Instruction – Circulars – Service Tax – Service tax Clearing Forwarding Agents Certain clarification F.No. V/DGST/21(9)/C F/2/ 99/10683, dated 6-6-2000 of the Mumbai Directorate of Service Tax The office of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax Cell, Chennai-II Commissionerate, has sought for a clarification, on the applica- bility of Service Tax, for the services rendered by a company/assessee which are as follows :- “The company/assessee owns storage tanks made of mild steel in different parts of India. These tanks are used for storing liquids/ chemicals for which customers pay rents based on the tanks capacity. In addition there are pipelines, valves, pumps e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Foreign Exchange Management (Export of goods and services) Regulations, 2000

Foreign Exchange Management (Export of goods and services) Regulations, 2000 – FEMA – 023/2000 – Dated:- 3-5-2000 – Foreign Exchange Management (Export of goods and services) Regulations, 2000 Notification No. FEMA 23 /2000-RB dated 3rd May 2000 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (EXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENT) CENTRAL OFFICE MUMBAI 400 001 Published in the Official Gazette of Government of India – Extraordinary – Part-II, Section 3, Sub-Section (i) dated 08.05.2000 – G.S.R. No. 409(E) In exercise of the power

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service Tax — Union Budget for the Financial Year 2000-2001 — Changes in respect of Service Tax

V/DGST/30-Misc-06/2000/8975 Dated:- 3-3-2000 Order-Instruction – Circulars – Service Tax – Service Tax Union Budget for the Financial Year 2000-2001 Changes in respect of Service Tax F.No. V/DGST/30-Misc-06/2000/8975, dated 3-3-2000 of the Directorate of Service Tax Please refer to the provisions made in the Finance Bill 2000 and the explanatory notes issued by the Ministry alongwith the d.o. letter F.No. 334/1/2000-TRU, dated 29-2-2000 of Joint Secretary (TRU), on the above subject. 2. The Hon'ble Finance Minister, while presenting the budget, indicated that no substantive changes are being made in respect of the administration of Service Tax, and the Government has decided to constitute an Experts Committee to go into the entire gamut of issues pertaining to this tax. Nevertheless, a few changes have been brought about which would require necessary action by all Commissionerates. 3.1. Notification No. 2/2000-S.T., dated 1-3-2000 has been issued providing full exempt

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

have got such service providers registered with them. However, in the meantime, the definitions of Tour Operators and Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operators were amended by virtue of provisions made in the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998. 3.2.2 The definition of term “Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operator” is contained in Section 65(38) of the Finance Act, 1994. Prior to the amendment, scope of said term was limited to a person who was holding a licence under the Rent-a-Cab Scheme, 1989, framed by the Central Government under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, as a Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operator. Under the said scheme, a licence is granted only in the case where a person has a minimum of 50 cabs. However, in the revised definition, the requirement of operators being registered under the Rent-a-Cab Scheme has been dispensed with. Consequently, any person who is engaged in the business of renting of cabs would be required to pay Service Tax, irrespective of number of vehicles engaged by him in providing this service. 3.2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ors and Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operators may be forwarded to this Directorate by 15-5-2000 indicating separately the number of new assessees who have been registered as a consequence of the revised definitions. 3.3.1 Clauses 112 113 of the Finance Bill, 2000 relate to retrospective amendments in the Finance Act, 1994 with reference to the services rendered by the Goods Transport Operators and the Clearing Forwarding Agents. The intention of these amendments is to validate the Rule 2 (1) (d) (xii) (xvii) of the Service Tax Rules,1994 which shifted the burden of levy on the service receivers in the case of services rendered by GTOs and C F Agents. As you are aware, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgement in the case of M/s. Laghu Udyog Bharati Others v. Union of India – 1999 (89) E.L.T. 247 held the above rules to be ultra vires the provisions of Finance Act, 1994. Accordingly, these rules were struck down. However, the Clause 112 seeks to incorporate new definitions for terms “A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified for Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U.P. of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Uttar Pradesh, as an eligible project or scheme

Income Tax – S. O. 318(E) – Dated:- 11-5-1999 – Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified for Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U.P. of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Uttar Pradesh, as an eligible project or scheme NOTIFICATION NO. S. O. 318(E) DATED 11-5-1999 Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance No. S.O. 822(E), dated 6th November, 19922, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had specified at serial number 1Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U.P. of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), P.O. Box No. 10,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U.P., of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Uttar Pradesh, as an eligible project or scheme

Deleted……

Service Tax — Interest in case of delayed payment of Service Tax to the Government — Clarification

3/DGST/98 Dated:- 16-11-1998 Order-Instruction – Circulars – Service Tax – Service Tax — Interest in case of delayed payment of Service Tax to the Government — Clarification Service Tax, Circular No. 3/DGST/98, dated 16-11-1998 Trade Notice No. 50/CE/98(Service Tax), dated 27-11-1998 of the Chandigarh Commissionerate Attention of the Trade and all other concerned is invited to the practice being followed in relation to charging of the interest in case of delayed payment o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U. P. by Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Dehra Dun as an eligible project or scheme

Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U. P. by Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Dehra Dun as an eligible project or scheme – Income Tax – S.O.977(E) – Dated:- 14-12-1995 – Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U. P. by Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Dehra Dun as an eligible project or scheme NOTIFICATION NO. S.O.977(E) DATED 14-12-1995 Whereas by Notification, vide S.O. No. 822(E), dated 6th November, 1992, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had specified

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Central Excise – Tungsten Halogen Bulbs – Applicability of Notification No. 67/83-C.E., dated 1-3-1983 – Clarification regarding

Central Excise – 4/94-CX.4 – Dated:- 17-1-1994 – Central Excise – Tungsten Halogen Bulbs – Applicability of Notification No. 67/83-C.E., dated 1-3-1983 – Clarification regarding Circular No. 4/94-CX.4 Dated 17-1-1994 [From F. No. 167/2/92-CX.4] Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi Subject : Central Excise – Tungsten Halogen Bulbs – Applicability of Notification No. 67/83-C.E., dated 1-3-1983 – Clarification regarding. Representations have been received relating to application of Notification No. 67/83-C.E., dated 1-3-1983 (as amended) to Tungsten Halogen Bulbs. Tungsten Halogen Bulbs are classifiable under Tariff Item No. 85.39 of the Schedule to the Central Excise

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sification and nomenclature of bulbs or lamps, or as the case may be, the wattage, length or diameter of bulbs or lamps, the definition as well as the procedure for testing including allowances for tolerances as prescribed in the Indian Standard Specifications shall be adopted. The relevant Tariff of Indian Standard Specifications dealing with lamps are IS : 1885 (Par XVI / Section 3)-1969. Under the category of incandescent lamps, three relevant sub heads are as follows : 2.1.7      Vacuum Lamp – Incandescent lamp in which the luminous element operates in an evacuated bulb. 2.1.8      Gas Filled Lamp – Incandescent lamp in which the luminous elements operate in a bulb filled with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Somany Pilkingstons Limited Versus Income-Tax Officer

1989 (9) TMI 156 – ITAT DELHI-A – [1989] 31 ITD 287 – Application For Rectification, Assessment Year, Retrospective Effect – Misc. Application No. 39 (Delhi) of 1989, Misc. Application No. 20 (Delhi) of 1981, IT Appeal No. 361(Chd.) of 1978-79, IT Appeal No. 362 of 1978-79, IT Appeal No. 363 (Chd.) of 1978-79, IT Appeal No. 364 (Chd.) of 1978-79 Dated:- 4-9-1989 – Member(s) : CH. G. KRISHNAMURTHY., F. C. RUSTAGI. ORDER Per Krishnamurthy, President-This is a misc. application filed by the assessee on 14-10-1988 bringing to the notice of the Tribunal that the allowance of an earlier misc. application filed by the I.T.O. Co. Cir., Rohtak on 28-1-1981, in his favour was out of time and was barred by limitation, was therefore wrong and should be cancelled. 2. The assessee claimed, inter alia, relief u/s 80J of the Income-tax Act, stating that in computing the capital employed for the purpose of the business, the borrowed capital also should be included as capital. The Tribunal by its ord

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t did exist in the order of the Tribunal and, therefore, it should be rectified. The operative portion of the order of the Tribunal was relevant and, we therefore, reproduce it below :- At the time of hearing of this application, the learned counsel for the assessee Sh. C.S. Agarwal did not oppose this petition and concede the point because as on today the decision of the Supreme Court on Sec. 80J and the effect of retrospective amendment were all decided against the assessee. The order of the Tribunal, therefore, stands modified to this extent, namely, that the relief u/s 80J will now have to be worked out excluding the loans taken by the assessee. The ITO will work out the capital accordingly. This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order passed by the Tribunal in I.T.A. Nos. 361 to 364 of 1978-79 dated 27-8-1980. 3. In this present misc. application, filed by the assessee, it is now pointed out that u/s. 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f time. The earlier misc. application was filed by the Department on 25-1-1981 though it was disposed of on 6-4-1985. The order of the Tribunal was dated 27th August, 1980. Reckoning the period of limitation of four years from the date of the order of the Tribunal namely 27th August, 1980, the order passed by the Tribunal on 6-4-1985 was clearly out of time, though the application for rectification was filed by the department on 27-1-1981 which was well within time. When an application was filed well within time, the time taken by the authority to rectify the mistake will not render the petition as time barred, even if the order was passed after the period of four years, because the crucial date is not the date of passing the order by the authority empowered to rectify the mistake but the date of filing of the petition, as otherwise the delay taken by the authority to rectify the mistake either voluntarily or involuntarily, may frustrate the very right given to an assessee to get his o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Old Act (to make the rectification) and if he had failed to do so, the High Court had power to issue a writ directing the ITO to make a rectification even though the period of four years fixed u/s 35 had expired. By relying upon this principle, the learned Advocate for the assessee very seriously contended that the time limit fixed to make a rectification could thus be lifted by the authority concerned if the application had been filed in time and since his application was filed in time, the Tribunal could pass an order now on his application holding that its earlier order of 6-4-1985 was barred by limitation even though the application for rectification for that order was filed by the Department. The period of four years from the date of the order of the Tribunal. We fail to see how the decision of the Allahabad High Court helped the assessee in any manner nor how the law could be one for the assessee and another for the Department because the power given to the Tribunal to rectify

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the Department did not act on those applications. It filed a writ in the High Court in 1967 for a writ to compel the I.T.O. to rectify the assessment. It was pleaded on behalf of the Revenue that as the period of four years prescribed for rectification by Sec. 35(1) had expired in 1960, no writ to enforce rectification could be issued. It was in that context that the High Court observed that it was the duty of the I.T.O. u/s 35 to make the rectification and as he had failed to do so, the High Court had power to issue a writ and directing the I.T.O. to make a rectification even though the period of four years fixed u/s 35 had expired. The High Court in this case, after reviewing the relevant Law on the subject, including the Halsbury s Laws of England came to the conclusion that the period prescribed u/s 35 could only be said to be the period within which proceedings and other section should be commenced and not that the power given on that section should be exercised within the perio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uage of sec. 254(2) and sec. 35 being on pari materia the law as made applicable to sec. 35 would also apply to Sec. 255(4) and, therefore, if an application has been made at any time within four years from the date of the order, with a view to rectify any mistake apparent from the record, the Tribunal may amend any order passed by it and in doing so, all that it has to see is whether the application was made in time. The limit of time provided in sec. 254(2) applies only to the commencement of the proceedings namely, filing of the application, bringing the mistake to the notice of the Tribunal and not to the orders to be passed by the Tribunal. Once the mistake has been brought to the notice of the Tribunal in time, that mistake can be rectified at any time even after the lapse of the period of four years otherwise it will lead to miscarriage of justice which is not the object of the Legislature, even though the Tribunal has to be careful enough to pass the orders as quickly as possib

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssed by the I.T.O. and the C.I.T. could have cancelled the order only if the earlier order had been passed by a Commissioner u/s 263 or sec. 264 and not otherwise. There were some other issues involved in this case which were decided by the High Court against the revenue but we are not concerned with any one of them in this matter. This decision, does not turn upon an issue even closer to the issue before us. 6. The learned counsel for the assessee also placed reliance upon a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Kapurchand Shrimal v. CIT [1981] 131 ITR 451. The Supreme Court laid down in this case the ruling that it is well known that an appellate authority has the jurisdiction as well as the duty to correct all errors in the proceedings under appeal and to issue, if necessary, appropriate directions to the authority against whose decision the appeal is preferred to dispose of the whole or any part of the matter afresh, unless forbidden from doing so by the statute. We fail to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the statutory time limit on merits and in accordance with law. This circular helps the cause of both the assessee as well as that of the Department. It applies with equal force to both the parties before us. We cannot say that the force of the Circular is applicable only to the applications filed on behalf of the assessee but not to the applications filed on behalf of the department. Before the law every one is equal, it cannot be slanted in favour of the assessee at the cost of the revenue or vice versa. The Law of Limitation vests a right in a party and if the limitation expires, a vested right accrues to the other party and that right cannot be easily tampered with by mere technicalities. Therefore, none of the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the assessee advance the cause of the assessee. To the petition filed by the assessee in time now but sought to be disposed of after the expiry of the four years, is in time we fail to see how on the same logic and reasoning

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Powers exercised by IACs u/s 144A-Coordination amongst assessing officers.

Income Tax – 1585/CBDT – Dated:- 29-10-1984 – INSTRUCTION NO. 1585/CBDT Dated: October 29, 1984 The Public Accounts Committee in their 26th Report has adversely commented upon the lack of proper coordination between different assessing officers and has further stated that this is a serious weakness in the set up of the direct taxes administration. 2. Sec.144 A provides for giving directions to the ITO by the Assistant Commissioners on (a) his own motion or (b) on a reference to his by the ITO or (c) on an application by the assessee. In these situations the IAC can call for and examine the records of any proceedings in which an assessment is pending and issue directions for the guidance of the ITO to enable him to complete the assessment.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Direct reference to Supreme court u/s 257 in case of divergence of opinion amongst High court.

Direct reference to Supreme court u/s 257 in case of divergence of opinion amongst High court. – Income Tax – 1408/CBDT – Dated:- 21-7-1981 – INSTRUCTION NO. 1408/CBDT Dated: July 21, 1981 Attention is invited to the Boards instruction No.1020 (F.No.277/15/75- ITJ) dated 5th November, 1976 whereby the Commissioners were directed that while scrutinising the orders of the appellate Tribunal for filing reference application u/s.256(1) they should instruct the Departmental Representatives to request the Tribunal to make a direct reference to the supreme court u/s.257 if there are conflicting decisions of two or more High Courts on any particular question of law. Further even in a reference sought by the assessee the Departmental Representatives

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1922 Act the ITO cannot bring to charge an item of income falling under clause b in such reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the period of four years under clause(a). According to the court a notice of reassessment cannot be issued after the period of 4 years in respect of items of income falling under clause(b) and the ITO cannot assume jurisdiction indirectly by issuing a notice purporting to be under clause(a). As against this view, Andhra Pradesh High court in the case of Pulavarthi Visvanadham and recently in the case of subakaran Gangabhishan dissented from Madras and Bombay view and held that once the assessment was reopened validly no distinction could be made between items falling under clause(a) and those falling under clau

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pierce, Leslie And Co. Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax,

1958 (9) TMI 99 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – AIR 1960 Mad 137, (1960) IIMLJ 1 – Dated:- 3-9-1958 – Rajagopalan And B Ayyar, JJ. JUDGMENT Rajagopalan, (1) Both the assessee and the Department were aggrieved, each with a part of the order of the Appellate Tribunal. On applications presented by them the Tribunal made a consolidated reference under S. 66(1) of the Income-tax Act and submitted three questions for the determination of this court. (2) The questions arose out of the assessment proceedings for the assessment years 1949-50 and 1950-51. (3) The second of the question, which is easiest answered, ran: "Whether the dividends of ₹ 36,820 and ₹ 32,603 received in the previous years for assessment years 1949-50 and 1950-51 from Plantation Companies whose main business was agriculture can be said to include any agricultural income exempt under S. 4(3) of the Income-tax Act." The issue is no longer res integra and it is concluded by the decision of the Supreme Court in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

agreement. In 1945-1946 the assessee company held such managing agencies for sixteen Plantation Companies. Tallier Estate Ltd. was one of such Plantation Companies, and the agreement between that company and the assessee was in 1937 (Annexure A). In 1945 Tallier Estate sold its plantation, which was in India, and, the company subsequently went into liquidation. On 24-7-1945 Tallier Estates passed a special resolution which ran: "That the Liquidator be authorised to pay the Secretaries and Agents, Pierce Leslie and Co., Ltd., London, 4500 by way of compensation for loss of office." In accordance with that resolution the assessee received ₹ 60,000, in the year of account which ended on 30-6-1946. That was treated as a trading receipt by the department for the purpose of assessment to income-tax, excess profits tax and business profits tax. When the assessee appealed to the Tribunal it purported to apply the principles laid down by this court in Commr. of Income-tax and Ex

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h v. Commr. of Income-tax, B. and O., 1943-11 ITR 513: (AIR 1943 PC 153), is a word of the broadest connotation and difficult and perhaps impossible to define in any precise general formula. Lord Macmillan said in Van Dan Berghs Ltd. v. Clark, (1935) 19 Tax Cas 390, that though in general the distinction between an income and a capital receipt was well recognised and easily applied, cases did arise where the item lay on the border line and the problem had to be solved on the particular facts of each case. No infallible criterion or test can be or has been laid down and the decided cases are only helpful in that they indicate the kind of consideration which may relevantly be borne in mind in approaching the problem." The learned Chief Justice observed further at p. 915 (of ITR): (at p. 495 of AIR): "The assessee before us is a company carrying on a business and it received the sum in question in connection with that business. We have, therefore, to ask ourselves as to what is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of its apparent capital assets. (7b) The relevant facts in as set out in the headnote were as follows: "The assessee (South India Pictures Ltd.) which carried on the business of distribution of films entered into three agreements for advancing monies to certain motion picture producers towards the production of three films and acquiring the rights of distribution thereof. The agreements, inter alia, provided that the assessee would advance certain sums of money in instalments for the production of the firms, the assessee acquiring the sole right to distribute the films for a period of five years from the date of release of each film. The assessee was to pay itself from the money realised by the distribution of the films its commission and the amount advanced to the producers and to pay the balance to the producers. The assessee had a charge by way of security on the negative and positive copies of the films for amounts due on account of advance. If the producers failed to deliver

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ertainly be regarded as having been so paid or received in the ordinary course of its business and therefore a trading disbursement or trading receipt… In fact in the accounting year the assessee had distribution rights in respect of eleven films including these three. These three agreements would have come to an end on the expiration of the period of five years from the respective dates of release of the films and had only a part of the period to run, a fact which may also be relevantly borne in mind. The cancellation of these agreements must have left the assessee free, if it so chose, to secure other films which could be distributed in the place of these films and which might have brought in better box office collections. In the language of Lord Hanworth M. R. in Short Bros. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue, (1927) 12 Tax Cas 955, the sum paid to the assessee was not truly compensation for not carrying on its business but was a sum paid in the ordinary course of business to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sessee's business of distribution of films proceeded apace notwithstanding the cancellation of these three agreements." (9) After pointing out that what the South India Pictures Ltd. entered into were composite agreements, and that even under the financing part of the agreements the South India Pictures Ltd. did not acquire any capital assets, the learned Chief Justice proceeded to observe at pp. 918-9 (of ITR): (at p. 497 of AIR): "Assuming that to start with the films constituted capital assets the entire capital outlay had been recovered and the security had been extinguished and that part of the agreements which constituted financing agreements had been fully worked out and had come to an end and the three films ceased to be capital assets and the assessee was holding the films only under that part of the agreements which constituted the distributing agency agreements which only were subsisting. In the premises the amount received by the assessee was only so received

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he assessee, taking up managing agency along with secretaryship to the Plantation company and other trading rights was part of the assessee's normal trading activities. The assessee dealt with among other things, the export of tea produced in India, and obtaining managing agencies and other rights from the Plantation companies certainly facilitated that trade in tea. The managing agencies the assessee obtained were liable to termination, in which event the assessee received the compensation it was entitled to by agreement. We should point out that the agreement (Annexure A) was not a contract for securing simpliciter the managing agency, for Tallier estates. It was a composite agreement securing other rights as well to the assessee, which helped it in its trading activities in tea. The assessee was in a position to obtain such contracts with Plantation companies because of its large experience in handling tea for export and also in managing plantations in India. Even confining ours

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

it was a trading receipt. (11) Mr. Rama Rao Sahib, learned counsel for the department, referred us also to Anglo French Exploration Co. Ltd. v. Clayson, 1956-30 ITR 309, Lord Evershed M. R. said at page 316: "If the matter were res integra, I think that there is much to be said for the simple view that a sum of money received in consideration for the giving up or destruction of an agreement under which you look to earn an annual sum if capital and not income; for in such case the sum received might be described fairly as the capitalised equivalent at the present time of income prospects." (12) After pointing out that the real question for determination was whether it was a profit or gain arising from the trade of the recipient within the terms of Sch. D. the learned Master of the Rolls proceeded. "And the matter is not in any case res integra. The line of cases to which we have had our attention directed starting from the well known trilogy: Inland Revenue Commrs. v. Ne

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ract in no sense affected the 'profit making apparatus' of the company which retained its offices and staff, in Johannesburg exactly as before." The case of the assessee before us was certainly analogous to that the Court of Appeal had to consider in 1956-30 ITR (Sup.) 309. (13) In our opinion, in the circumstances in which the assessee company carried on its trading operations the amount of ₹ 60,000 constituted a trading receipt received in the usual course of its business activities. (14) We answer the first question in the affirmative and against the assessee. (15) The third question ran: "Whether the credit balances in the capital profits accounts, profit and loss account and business profits tax post war refund suspense account form part of the 'reserve' of the assessee within the meaning of rule 2(1) of Sch. II of the Business Profits Tax Act ?" The relevant chargeable accounting periods for the assessment to business profits tax were: (1) 1-4

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

econd question which we have set out above. (17) The sums in question apparently represented the undistributed profits and were shown in the balance sheet partly as capital and partly as revenue receipts. During the arguments before us the learned counsel for the assessee limited the claim for abatement to the following amounts: .27857 (capital profits account) and .219 (profit and loss account) for the chargeable accounting periods 1 and 2 we have mentioned above; .9812-0-5 (capital profits account) and .30-7-4 (profit and loss account) for the chargeable accounting periods 3 and 4. In addition the assessee claimed abatement with reference to the chargeable accounting periods 2, 3 and 4 of another sum of .19236, which amount was shown in the balance sheets under the head excess profits tax post war Refund suspense account. (18) Did these amounts constitute reserves within the meaning of rule 2(1) for the relevant chargeable accounting periods is the question, which, as we have said, h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lying unutilised and not specially set apart for any purpose on the crucial date did not constitute reserves within the meaning of Sch. II, rule 2(1)" on this basis of what was pointed out by this court at page 245 (of ITR): (at p. 327 of AIR) in 1957-32 ITR 237: (AIR 1958 Mad 326), what the Tribunal will have to decide in this case is whether, with reference to each of the sums we have mentioned above, any one possessed of the requisite authority indicated on or before the crucial dates, with reference to each of the chargeable accounting periods, the manner of disposal or the destination of the funds of the company which constituted its profits. Was any portion of the profits specifically set apart for any purpose on or before the crucial date and was it so set apart by one having the requisite authority? It was on an erroneous view of the law that the Tribunal upheld the claim of the assessee, and as we said there was no occasion at that stage to investigate the question at is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HART (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) Versus SANGSTER

1957 (3) TMI 59 – THE COURT OF APPEAL – [1958] 34 ITR 303 (CA) – – Dated:- 19-3-1957 – LORD GODDARD C.J., JENKINS and L. SELLERS JJ. JUDGMENT APPEAL from Vaisey J. [1956] 1 W.L.R. 1105; [1956] 3 All E.R. 52; 31 I.T.R. 624 This was an appeal by the taxpayer, John Young Sangster, from the decision of Vaisey J., who reversed the decision of the Commissioners for the Special Purposes of the Income Tax Acts, who had substantially reduced assessments made upon the taxpayer to income tax, Schedule D, for the years 1951-1952, 1952-1953, in respect of interest on a deposit account which he kept with the Colmore Row, Birmingham, branch of Barclays Bank. The case stated by the Commissioners for the Special Purposes of the Income Tax Acts, so far as relevant, provided: 1. At a meeting of the commissioners held on January 28, 1955, John Young Sangster (hereinafter called "the taxpayer") appealed against assessments made upon him to income-tax, Schedule D, for the years and in the amou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

they applied to the 1952-1953 assessment in the same manner as they applied to the 1951-1952 assessment. (2) The assessments under appeal were made upon the basis that the income in question had to be computed in accordance with the Finance Act, 1951, s. 21, which deals with cases where a person acquires a new source or an addition to any source of income chargeable under Case III of Schedule D. The provisions apply in relation to new sources or additions to sources of income acquired before April 6, 1951, only where income first arose therefrom on or after that date. (3) Cases where a person has acquired a new source or an addition to any source of such income and income first arose therefrom before that date are governed by the Finance Act, 1926, s. 30. (4) If the matter were governed by the Finance Act, 1951, s. 21, then subparagraph (a) of and the proviso to paragraph 2(1) of the Rules applicable to Case III of Schedule D to the Income Tax Act, 1918, would apply to interest upon t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the taxpayer and the bank. Interest on deposit accounts was calculated on the principal on a day-to-day basis and was credited on half-yearly rest dates, June 20 and December 20 in each year. When it was so credited, the interest became principal and then (and not before) began itself to earn interest. It was not the practice to allow accruing interest to be withdrawn between the half-yearly rest dates, save that if an account was closed at any time interest was calculated up to the date of closure, credited and withdrawn as principal. The rate of interest varied from time to time. In 1951 the bank required 14 days' notice of withdrawals from deposit account; a depositor who wished to make a withdrawal without this notice could do so, but would lose 14 days' interest on the sum withdrawn. The taxpayer withdrew ? 253,000 on March 30, 1951, without giving the 14 days' notice, and 14 days' interest on this sum was deducted in calculating the interest credited on the follow

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s to which the appeal related should be computed in accordance with section 30 of the Finance Act, 1926. 7. It was contended on behalf of the Crown:- (1) That the taxpayer acquired a new source, or an addition to a source, of income chargeable under Case III of Schedule D on March 17, 1951. (2) That income first arose therefrom after April 6, 1951; that is to say, on June 20, 1951 when the interest was placed at the credit and disposal of the taxpayer. (3) That income tax for the years to which the appeal related was properly computed by reference to the provisions of section 21 of the Finance Act, 1951. The commissioners were referred, inter alia, to the following authorities: Cull v. Cowcher [1934] 18 T.C. 449; Simpson v. Executors of Bonner Maurcie [1929] 14 T.C. 580; 45 T.L.R. 581; St. Lucia Usines and Estates Co. v. St. Lucia (Colonial Treasurers) [1924] A.C. 508; Dewar v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue [1935] 2 K.B. 351; 19 T.C. 561; 51 T.L.R. 536; Apportionment Act, 1870. The c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n March 17, 1951, income first arose therefrom on June 20, 1951. On April 26, 1955, we determined the appeal by adjusting the assessments to the following figures, which had been agreed between the parties to be correct upon the basis of our decision in principle: the 1951-1952 assessment we reduced to ? 53; the 1952-1953 assessment we reduced to ? 7,032." The inspector of taxes appealed to the court. On July 3, 1956, the appeal was allowed by Vaisey J. who held that the source or origin of the interest on the ? 2,000,000 was the deposit of the money coupled with the contract between the taxpayer and the bank; that it was not to be found in an existing contract but that a new contractual relationship resulted from and was brought into existence by the tender of that sum by the taxpayer and its acceptance by the bank on the date in question; that, accordingly, the taxpayer acquired a new source, or an addition to a source, of income chargeable under Case III of Schedule D on March

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t a contract is made with the bank under which, so long as the account continues in existence, interest will be paid on whatever balance there is to the credit of that account. In other words, there is one contract which continues to run throughout the existence of the deposit account. Contrary to the contention of the Crown, a new contrast is not entered into on every occasion on which the depositor pays a sum into that account. It is conceded that if the lodgment of the sum in question did constitute a new source, or an addition to a source, then the income therefrom first arose after April 5, 1951, and that for tax purposes it is to be computed in accordance with the provisions of section 21 of the Finance Act, 1951. The relationship between banker and customer is that of debtor and creditor: per Atkin L.J. in Joachimson v. Swiss Bank Corporation [1921] 3 K.B. 110, 126; 37 T.L.R. 534. That case concerned a current account, but the only differences between a current and a deposit acc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

new and separate source. That would cause very great practical difficulties. Roy Borneman Q.C. and Sir Reginald Hills for the Crown. There is a new contract every time a sum is accepted on deposit. Even if it be held that there is a single continuing contract throughout the existence of a deposit account, that of itself produces no income. It is the operation of that contract on the particular sums of money deposited that produces the income, where there is a contractual right to receive interest, and accordingly new deposits of money in a deposit account are new sources or additions to sources of income within Case III of Schedule D. Heyworth Talbot Q.C. replied. LORD GODDARD C.J. This is an appeal from a judgment of Vaisey J., who reversed the decision of the special commissioners, who adjusted certain assessments for the years 1951-1952 and 1952-1953 made upon Sangster in respect of certain interest which he received on a deposit account which he kept at Barclays Bank. Sangster, who

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ncipal. The rate of interest allowed varied from time to time." It happened that in 1951 a very large sum of money amounting to ?2,000,000 was paid into the deposit account, which even then had a substantial sum of money in it, and it is in respect of interest earned by this very largely increased amount of money paid in that this appeal arises. The point which the court has to decide is one which is exceedingly simple in statement. It is, what was the source of the income? The special commissioners held that the contract was the source of the income. Vaisey J. took a different view, and I think held that the source of income was the deposit of the money coupled with the contract I say at once that I cannot agree that where a deposit account is kept between a customer and a banker there is a new contract every time money is paid in; I think that it is one continuing contract, but the contract itself yields no income at all. The deposit of money would yield no income at all unless

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rms to repay it. As a general rule he does not pay interest on a current account, although bankers do at times agree to allow interest on a current account if a certain credit balance is maintained. We need not consider current amounts in this case at all. We are only concerned with deposit accounts under which money is paid in at 14 days' notice; that is to say, that the customer cannot withdraw the money without giving 14 days' notice, though he may be allowed to do so if he gives up interest. Interest at the current rate is allowed by the banker, and the current rate generally is regulated by the Bank rate. Sangster had been assessed under Case III of Schedule D in respect of this interest which he had been receiving, and I think that it is necessary in considering this matter to refer to section 21 of the Finance Act, 1951. [His Lordship read part of subsection (i) and continued:] It was argued in the present case that the source of income was the contract. I cannot agree w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =