Padmavati Enterprise, Abicor & Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Union of India & Anr.

Padmavati Enterprise, Abicor & Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Union of India & Anr.
GST
2018 (3) TMI 480 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – 2018 (11) G. S. T. L. 124 (Bom.)
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-3-2018
Writ Petitoin (L) No. 424 of 2018, Writ Petition (ST. ) No. 2230 of 2018
GST
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
Mr. Vinayak Patkar a/w. Ishan Patkar, L.Y. Patwardhan, Mr. Shahikant Dhond i/b. Ms. Roshni Naik, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Anil C. Singh, ASG a/w. Mr. V.A. Sonpal, Special Counsel, Mr. M. Dwivedi and Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Milind Gawai, Commissioner, GST, Pune, present.  
P.C. :
The petitioner's counsel Shri. Patkar appearing for the petition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

jection. He submits that these are not agreed Minutes, but, they are drawn up by the association and they could be at best treated as a representation of the association.  
4. Be that as it may, since the learned Additional Solicitor General has filed a one page note which we have taken record about part compliance, at least we have no doubt in our mind that the remaining grievances of the petitioners in this petition and the association would be redressed. Thereafter, the systems would operate strictly in terms of the act and rules. We, therefore, place these matters on 24th April, 2018. We hope and trust that by this time all the outstanding and pending issues would be resolved so as to make the system fully operational and function

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Wheels Tourists Operator Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise

M/s. Wheels Tourists Operator Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
Service Tax
2018 (3) TMI 418 – CESTAT CHENNAI – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 86 (Tri. – Chennai)
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 6-3-2018
Appeal Nos. ST/32 and 162/2008 – Final Order Nos. 40579-40580 / 2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri S.Venkatachalam, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The issue in both the appeals being identical, they are heard together and are disposed by this common order.
2. Brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in the business of providing Tourist Transport Service. They render services mainly to travel agency service and corporate entities. Apart from this, they also render services to the individual clients directly. Based on intelligence that the appellant had not been discharging service tax on the actual value of taxabl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in the business of rent-a-cab service. To fall under the said definition, the control of cab/vehicle should be handed over to the person who hired the cab. In the appellant s case, the vehicle was always under the appellant s control and at no point of time the control has been handed over to other travel agents for their use. The vehicles / cabs were engaged by the other travels agents mostly for the journey of the foreign tourists and also to some extent for domestic clients. The said travel agents send the vehicles to places of visit arranged by them. The vehicles were engaged for the said trip as agreed on kilometer basis and the vehicle was always under the control of the appellant and driven by the appellant s driver and therefore the appellant have only provided transport services. The activity therefore does not fall under the category of rent-a-cab operator service. Accordingly, no service tax can be fixed on the appellant. He relied upon the following case laws:-
a. Commis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

en held in favour of the department. That the decision rendered by the Hon'ble High Court of Uttarkhand in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Sachin Malhotra (supra) has been rendered without taking note of the earlier decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Vijay Travels (supra). He submitted that the said decision may be applied to the present case as the facts being the same.
6. Heard both sides.
7. The issue that arises for consideration is whether the activity of providing cab to other travel agents for rendering services to foreign tourist would fall under the definition of rent-a-cab service. The definition of rent-a-cab scheme operator as under section 65(91) is any person engaged in the business of renting of cabs. The Hon'ble High Court in the case of Sachin Malhotra (supra) has analyzed the meaning of Renting . It was held that renting is different from hiring.
8. In para 15.4, the Commissioner has noted that the appellant provided their v

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CGST, New Delhi Versus M/s SMCC Construction India Pvt. Ltd.

CGST, New Delhi Versus M/s SMCC Construction India Pvt. Ltd.
Service Tax
2018 (3) TMI 274 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 6-3-2018
Appeal No. ST/50286/2018-SM – Final Order No. 50861/2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial)
Shri G.R. Singh, D.R. – for the appellant
Shri Varun Gaba, Advocate – for the respondent
ORDER
Per Ashok Jindal
Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order.
2. The facts of the case are that for the period 2004-2008, certain audit objections were raised for availment of inadmissible Cenvat credit by the respondent along with interest and proceedings against the respondent were closed. Later on, the respondent filed an application under Voluntarily Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013, on 25.9.2013 for the period 2008-2012 for reversal of inadmissible Cenvat credit taken by them. The said declaration was rejected in terms of Section 106(1) of Finance Act, 2013. On appeal, the ld. Commissioner

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e in a writ petition filed by the petitioner. Therefore, the same is not applicable to the facts of this case.
4. On the other hand, the ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent reiterated the findings of the impugned order.
5. Heard both sides. Considered the submissions.
6. The short issue involved in the matter is that whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the provisions of Section 106(1) of Finance Act, 2013 debars the respondent not to take benefit of the scheme or not. Admittedly, for the earlier period, during the course of audit an objection was raised and respondent immediately reversed the Cenvat credit along with interest proceedings against the respondent were closed. The issue raised by the Revenue is that as the order of determination of their service tax liability, therefore, the respondent are not entitled to avail the benefit of Section 106(1) of the Finance Act, 2013. The said issue has been examined by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in the i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under Section 73' can be issued only pursuant to the issuance of a Show Cause Notice. The Adjudicating Authority is misconstrued to hold that the audit para of IAR No. 95/08 is an 'order of determination' whereas subsections (3) & (4A) of Section 73 of Finance Act 1994 speak of waiver of Show Cause Notice and without issuance of SCN, no order of determination can be made under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994. Further, there is no allegation that pursuant to audit para, proviso to these sub-sections has been invoked against the appellant in respect of the issue of VCES declaration. What is important to note is the admittance of Adjudicating Authority that ' the audit para similar to the issue of VCES declaration stands closed upon payment of entire dues by the appellant along with interest'. Thus, it is an admitted position that no Show Cause Notice has been issued to the appellant in respect of the relevant audit para. When no Show Cause Notice has been issued to the appellant, th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

urt that “we are of the view that the payment which has been made and for a past audit objection, for an earlier period cannot be utilised to reject the application as is now made by the present writ petitioner. The application invoking VCES has to be considered and if at all rejected, it must be on the touchstone of the paragraphs of the VCES, 2013 and the wording thereof. The scheme itself cannot be defeated by holding that on the earlier occasion parties like the petitioners have accepted their liability….we allow the writ petition.” The ratio of this judgement is squarely applicable to the instant case. Further, as discussed above, there is no other objection barring the similarity of the issue of VCES declaration to an earlier audit para, which according to the aforecited judgement, is not sustainable. To sum up, I hold that (a) the audit para is not an 'order of determination' under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 (b) Section 106(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 is not invocable

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Regulations on Taxable Services in Joint Ventures: Key Guidelines and Compliance Updates for Members.

GST Regulations on Taxable Services in Joint Ventures: Key Guidelines and Compliance Updates for Members.
Circulars
GST
Joint Venture – taxable services provided by the members of the Joint V

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ISD to SEZ units

ISD to SEZ units
Query (Issue) Started By: – LAKSHMINARAYANAN TR Dated:- 5-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 6-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Hi,
Can Input services Distributor distributes credit to one of their units in SEZ? if so, how to distribute when both of them in same state? IGST or not?
Thanks in Advance.
Durai
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
According to Section 16 of IGST Act, 2017
Therefore when you supply goods or service or both to SEZ Unit or SEZ Developer you can do so as per above provisions. Therefore in my opinion you cannot distribute credit to SEZ unit or Developer.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Also read these FAQs
Q14. How to distribute common credit amo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ear, in reality, certainly suppliers insist SEZ units to pay the GST as they initially Had a struggle with LUT, now with refunds. We also observe that unregistered Suppliers do supply to SEZ units without GST, though technically law doesn't allow them without registration. These are the practical issues we have for SEZ units. How about supplies u/s 9(3), if the SEZ unit being the recepient, are they suppose to pay the tax, if so, can they take ITC and go for refund? Please share your thoughts.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
In my view, ISD can distribute IGST to SEZ . Regarding the remaining second query, SEZ as receiver will pay GST and get refund.
Reply By LAKSHMINARAYANAN TR:
The Reply:
Many thanks again for shedding some lig

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amount Recovered From Employees

Amount Recovered From Employees
Query (Issue) Started By: – tasvir sharma Dated:- 5-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 8-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
Hi Experts,
we are manufacturer,
No GST charged by the company on account of telephone recovery made from employees
GST Applicable on it or Not.
Regards
Tasvir Sharma
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
The telephone Service Supplier would have charged gst on the supply of the service. Therefore you will collect the entire amount including gst charged by the service supplier. Therefore if you charge gst again you have to deposit the same into Government Account which will amount charging gst for the second time on the same service supplied whi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

reated neither a supply of goods or supply of services.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Please clarify your query further.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Yesterday I posted extract of FAQ as additional knowledge. I agree with the views of Sh.Ranganathan, Sir.
There cannot be double taxation.
Reply By CS SANJAY MALHOTRA:
The Reply:
Amount recovered from Employees for Mobile use signifies the usage of Mobile by employee for his personal purposes. Company is not eligible for ITC as per Section 17(5) of CGST Act, as these services are for personal consumption and not to be used in furtherance of business.
If ITC is availed and afterwards GST is collected from Employees, the same is to be deposited as is treated as Supply.
Rep

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st March 2018)

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st March 2018)
GST
Dated:- 5-3-2018

INTRODUCTION:
The introduction of Goods and Services Tax on 1st of July 2017 was a very significant step in the field of indirect tax reforms in India. By amalgamating a large number of Central and State taxes into a single tax, the aim was to mitigate cascading or double taxation in a major way and pave the way for a common national market. From the consumer point of view, the biggest advantage would be in terms of a reduction in the overall tax burden on goods, which was estimated to be around 25%-30%. Introduction of GST would also make Indian products competitive in the domestic and international markets. Studies show that this would have a positive impact on economic growth. Last but not the least, this tax, because of its transparent and self-policing character, would be easier to administer.
GENESIS:
2. The idea of moving towards the GST was first mooted by the then Union Finance Minis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tes were clearly demarcated in the Constitution with almost no overlap between the respective domains. The Centre had powers to levy tax on the manufacture of goods (except alcoholic liquor for human consumption, opium, narcotics etc.) while the States had powers to levy tax on sale of goods. In case of inter-State sales, the Centre had power to levy a tax (Central Sales Tax) but the tax was collected and retained entirely by the originating States. As for services, it was the Centre alone that was empowered to levy service tax. Since the States were not empowered to levy any tax on the sale or purchase of goods in the course of their importation into or exportation from India, the Centre levied and collected this tax as additional duties of customs, which was in addition to the Basic Customs Duty. This additional duty of customs (commonly known as CVD and SAD) counter balanced excise duties, sales tax, State VAT and other taxes levied on the like domestic products. Introduction of GST

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST). The Parliament would have exclusive power to levy GST (integrated tax – IGST) on inter-State trade or commerce (including imports) in goods or services. The Central Government will have the power to levy excise duty in addition to the GST on tobacco and tobacco products. The tax on supply of five specified petroleum products namely crude, high speed diesel, petrol, ATF and natural gas would be levied from a later date on the recommendation of GST Council.
5. A Goods and Services Tax Council (GSTC) was constituted comprising the Union Finance Minister, the Minister of State (Revenue) and the State Finance Ministers to recommend on the GST rate, exemption and thresholds, taxes to be subsumed and other features. This mechanism would ensure some degree of harmonization on different aspects of GST between the Centre and the States as well as across States. One half of the total number of members of GSTC would form quorum in meetings of GSTC. Decision in GSTC would be taken by a major

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ive meetings of the GSTC have been held so far. The following major decisions have been taken by the GSTC:
(i) The threshold exemption limit would be ₹ 20 lakh. For special category States (except J&K) enumerated in article 279A of the Constitution, threshold exemption limit has been fixed at ₹ 10 lakh.
(ii) Composition threshold shall be ₹ 1 crore. As decided in the 23rd meeting of the GSTC, this limit shall be raised to ₹ 1.5 crore after necessary amendments in the Act. Composition scheme shall not be available to inter-State suppliers, service providers (except restaurant service) and specified category of manufacturers. For special category States (except J&K and Uttarakhand) enumerated in article 279A of the Constitution, threshold exemption limit has been fixed at ₹ 75 lakh.
(iii) Existing tax incentive schemes of Central or State governments may be continued by respective government by way of reimbursement through budgetary route. The schemes, in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e States for any revenue loss on account of implementation of GST. The list of goods and services in case of which reverse charge would be applicable has also been finalized.
(v) The five laws namely CGST Law, UTGST Law, IGST Law, SGST Law and GST Compensation Law have been recommended.
(vi) In order to ensure single interface, all administrative control over 90% of taxpayers having turnover below ₹ 1.5 crore would vest with State tax administration and over 10% with the Central tax administration. Further all administrative control over taxpayers having turnover above ₹ 1.5 crore shall be divided equally in the ratio of 50% each for the Central and State tax administration.
(vii) Powers under the IGST Act shall also be cross-empowered on the same basis as under CGST and SGST Acts with few exceptions.
(viii) Power to collect GST in territorial waters shall be delegated by Central Government to the States.
(ix) Formula and mechanism for GST Compensation Cess has been fi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s from GTA to unregistered persons has been exempted from tax.
(xv) Registration and operationalization of TDS/TCS provisions has been postponed till 31.03.2018.
(xvi) The e-way bill system shall be introduced nation-wide for all inter-State supplies with effect from 01.02.2018. As regards intra-State supplies, option has been given to States to choose any date on or before 01.06.2018.
(xvii) www.ewaybillgst.gov.in, managed by NIC, shall be the Common Goods and Services Tax Electronic Portal for generation of e-way bill.
(xviii) E-Wallet Scheme shall be introduced for exporters from 01.04.2018 and till then relief for exporters shall be given in form of broadly existing practice.
(xix) All taxpayers are required to file return FORM GSTR-3B & pay tax on monthly basis.
(xx) Taxpayers with turnover upto ₹ 1.5 Cr are required to file information in FORM GSTR-1 on a quarterly basis. Other taxpayers would have to file FORM GSTR-1 on a monthly basis.
(xxi) Time period for filing

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n if payment has not been received in foreign convertible currency – such suppliers shall be eligible for input tax credit.
(xxvii) Centralized UIN shall be issued to every Foreign Diplomatic Mission / UN Organization by the Central Government.
(xxviii) www.gst.gov.in, managed by GSTN, shall be the Common Goods and Services Tax Electronic Portal.
(xxix) Rate of interest on delayed payments and delayed refund has been recommended.
(xxx) Rules for National Anti-Profiteering Authority have been recommended. The National Anti-Profiteering Authority has been constituted having Chairman and four technical Members. Further Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering and State level Screening Committee have also been set up.
SALIENT FEATURES OF GST:
8. The salient features of GST are as under:
(i) GST would be applicable on “supply” of goods or services as against the present concept of tax on manufacture of goods or on sale of goods or on provision of services.
(ii) GST would be based on

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST & IGST would be levied at rates to be mutually agreed upon by the Centre and the States under the aegis of the GSTC.
(viii) GST would replace the following taxes currently levied and collected by the Centre:
a) Central Excise Duty;
b) Duties of Excise (Medicinal and Toilet Preparations);
c) Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance);
d) Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Products);
e) Additional Duties of Customs (commonly known as CVD);
f) Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD);
g) Service Tax;
h) Cesses and surcharges insofar as they relate to supply of goods or services.
(ix) State taxes that would be subsumed within the GST are:
a) State VAT;
b) Central Sales Tax;
c) Purchase Tax;
d) Luxury Tax;
e) Entry Tax (All forms);
f) Entertainment Tax (except those levied by the local bodies);
g) Taxes on advertisements;
h) Taxes on lotteries, betting and gambling;
i) State cesses and surcharges insofar as they relate to supply of goods

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

K and Uttarakhand) enumerated in article 279A of the Constitution). As decided in the 23rd meeting of the GSTC, this limit shall be raised to ₹ 1.5 crore after necessary amendments in the Act. The threshold exemption and compounding scheme would be optional.
(xiv) The list of exempted goods and services would be kept to a minimum and it would be harmonized for the Centre and the States as well as across States as far as possible.
(xv) All Exports and supplies to SEZs and SEZ units would be zero-rated.
(xvi) Credit of CGST paid on inputs may be used only for paying CGST on the output and the credit of SGST/UTGST paid on inputs may be used only for paying SGST/UTGST. In other words, the two streams of input tax credit (ITC) cannot be cross utilized, except in specified circumstances of inter-State supplies for payment of IGST. The credit would be permitted to be utilized in the following manner:
a) ITC of CGST allowed for payment of CGST & IGST in that order;
b) ITC of SGST al

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

business.
(xix) Electronic filing of returns by different class of persons at different cut-off dates.
(xx) Various modes of payment of tax available to the taxpayer including internet banking, debit/ credit card and National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) / Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS).
(xxi) Obligation on certain persons including government departments, local authorities and government agencies, who are recipients of supply, to deduct tax at the rate of 1% from the payment made or credited to the supplier where total value of supply, under a contract, exceeds two lakh and fifty thousand rupees. The provision for TDS has not been operationalized yet.
(xxii) Refund of tax to be sought by taxpayer or by any other person who has borne the incidence of tax within two years from the relevant date.
(xxiii) Obligation on electronic commerce operators to collect 'tax at source', at such rate not exceeding two per cent. (2%) of net value of taxable supplies, out of payments to su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of defaulting taxable person.
(xxix) Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal would be constituted by the Central Government for hearing appeals against the orders passed by the Appellate Authority or the Revisional Authority. States would adopt the provisions relating to Tribunal in respective SGST Act.
(xxx) Provision for penalties for contravention of the provision of the proposed legislation has been made.
(xxxi) Advance Ruling Authority would be constituted by States in order to enable the taxpayer to seek a binding clarity on taxation matters from the department. Centre would adopt such authority under CGST Act.
(xxxii) An anti-profiteering clause has been provided in order to ensure that business passes on the benefit of reduced tax incidence on goods or services or both to the consumers.
(xxxiii) Elaborate transitional provisions have been provided for smooth transition of existing taxpayers to GST regime.
BENEFITS OF GST:
(A) Make in India:
(i) Will help to create a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s and that between intra and inter-State sales;
(ix) Average tax burden on companies is likely to come down which is expected to reduce prices and lower prices mean more consumption, which in turn means more production thereby helping in the growth of the industries. This will create India as a “Manufacturing hub”.
(B) Ease of Doing Business:
(i) Simpler tax regime with fewer exemptions;
(ii) Reduction in multiplicity of taxes that are at present governing our indirect tax system leading to simplification and uniformity;
(iii) Reduction in compliance costs – No multiple record keeping for a variety of taxes- so lesser investment of resources and manpower in maintaining records;
(iv) Simplified and automated procedures for various processes such as registration, returns, refunds, tax payments, etc;
(v) All interaction to be through the common GSTN portal- so less public interface between the taxpayer and the tax administration;
(vi) Will improve environment of compliance as all

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

S TAX NETWORK:
9. Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has been set up by the Government as a private company under erstwhile Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. GSTN would provide three front end services to the taxpayers namely registration, payment and return. Besides providing these services to the taxpayers, GSTN would be developing back-end IT modules for 28 States who have opted for the same. The migration of existing taxpayers has already started from November, 2016. The Revenue department of both Centre and States are pursuing the presently registered taxpayers to complete the necessary formalities on the IT system operated by GSTN for successful migration.
10. GSTN has selected 73 IT, ITeS and financial technology companies and 1 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (CCT, Karnataka), to be called GST Suvidha Providers (GSPs). GSPs would develop applications to be used by taxpayers for interacting with the GSTN.
OTHER LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS:
11. Four Laws namely CGST Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Similar notifications have been issued by all the States under the respective SGST Act.
13. Apart from the notifications, 37 circulars and 12 orders have also been issued by CBEC on various subjects like proper officers, ease of exports, and extension of last dates for filling up various forms, etc.
ROLE OF CBEC:
14. CBEC is playing an active role in the drafting of GST law and procedures, particularly the CGST and IGST law, which will be exclusive domain of the Centre. This apart, the CBEC has prepared itself for meeting the implementation challenges, which are quite formidable. The number of taxpayers has gone up significantly. The existing IT infrastructure of CBEC has been suitably scaled up to handle such large volumes of data. Based on the legal provisions and procedure for GST, the content of work-flow software such as ACES (Automated Central Excise & Service Tax) would require reengineering. The name of IT project of CBEC under GST is 'SAKSHAM' involving a total project val

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e than 52000 officers (including around 20000 officers from States) have already been trained. Out of these 7000 officers have attended refresher-training course also.
17. It is expected that a momentous reform like GST is popularized and familiarized to the trade and industry who are the vital stakeholders in successful implementation of this reform.
18. CBEC would be responsible for administration of the CGST and IGST law. In addition, excise duty regime would continue to be administered by the CBEC for levy and collection of central excise duty on five specified petroleum products as well as on tobacco products. CBEC would also continue to handle the work relating to levy and collection of customs duties.
19. Director General of Safeguards, CBEC has been mandated to conduct detailed enquiry on anti-profiteering cases and should give his recommendation for consideration of the National Anti-profiteering Authority.
20. CBEC has been instrumental in handholding the implementation o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

September, 2017
69,42,388
13
No. of 3(B) returns filed for October, 2017
65,55,313
14
No. of 3(B) returns filed for November, 2017
65,09,157
15
No. of 3(B) returns filed for December, 2017
64,04,210
16
No. of 3(B) returns filed for January, 2018
60,01,547
17
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for July, 2017
55,99,544
18
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for August, 2017
21,62,757
19
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for September, 2017
58,34,110
20
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for October, 2017
21,46,467
21
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for November, 2017
21,19,436
22
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for December, 2017
52,61,546
23
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for January, 2018
6,57,261
24
No. of GSTR 2 returns filed for July, 2017
25,72,552
25
No. of GSTR 4 return filed for quarter Jul-Sep, 2017
8,84,462
26
No. of GSTR 4 return filed for quarter Oct-Dec, 2017
12,22,359
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS RELEASED BY CBEC:
22. To guide taxpayers in relation to GST matters, CBEC

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. JSW Energy Ltd.

In Re: M/s. JSW Energy Ltd.
GST
2018 (5) TMI 763 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 92 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 5-3-2018
GST-ARA-05/2017/B-08
GST
B.V. BORHADE AND PANKAJ KUMAR (MEMBER)
MAHARASHTRA AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING
(constituted under section 96 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-05/2017/B-04
Mumbai, dt.05/03/2018
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Ms. JSW Energy Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the applicability of GST on:
1. Supply of coal or any other inputs on a job work basis by JSL to JEL
2. Su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CJ8109N1Z8 is engaged in the business of generation of power. The Applicant's power plant is divided into four units.
2. JSW Steel Limited (“JSL”), having GST Registration No. 27AAACJ4323N1ZG is engaged in manufacture and supply of steel. JSL requires power on a continuous and dedicated basis, for manufacturing steel at its steel plant. For the said purpose, JSL and the Applicant proposed to enter into an arrangement (herein after referred to as 'Job Work Agreement') pertaining to Unit Ill and Unit IV of the power plant which are in the nature of a captive power plant.
3. In terms of the proposed arrangement, JSL would supply coal or any other inputs (herein after collectively referred to as 'inputs') to the Applicant on a free-of-cost basis. On receipt of the same, JEL would undertake certain processes to convert the said inputs into power. In accordance with the Job Work Agreement, the title to the coal or any other inputs along with the power generated from the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ination before the Authority for Advance Ruling ('AAR') is the applicability of GST on:
I. Supply of coal or any other inputs on a job work basis by JSL to JEL
II. Supply of power by JEL to JSL
III. Job work charges payable to JEL by JSL
ANNEXURE II – STATEMENT CONTAINING THE APPLICANT'S INTERPRETATION OF LAW AND/OR FACTS, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN RESPECT OF THE QUESTION(S) ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS REQUIRED
1. ISSUE FOR DETERMINATION
1.1, The questions/ issues before Your Honor for determination are applicability of GST on:
a. Supply of coal or any other inputs on a job work basis by JSL to JEL
b. Supply of power by JEL to JSL
c. Job work charges payable to JEL by JSL
1.2. The questions / issues placed for determination before Your Honor have to be appreciated in light of the following position of law and its applicability to the proposed activity by the Applicant, discussed hereunder.
2. POSITION OF LAW
PROVISIONS REGARDING 'JOB WORK' UNDER THE GST REGI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of Job Work or otherwise, within one year of their being sent out, to any place of business of the Principal. Fulfilment of such a condition would allow movement of inputs between the said entities without payment of taxes. For the said purpose, inputs include intermediate goods arising from any treatment or processes carried out on the inputs by the Principal or the Job Worker.
Relevant extracts of the said Section are reproduced as follows:
143. (1) registered person (hereafter in this section referred us the “principal”) may under intonation and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, send any inputs or capital goods without payment of tax, to a job worker for job work and from there subsequently send to another Job worker and likewise, and shall. –
(a) bring back inputs, after completion of job work or otherwise, or capital goods, other than moulds and dies, Jigs and fixture, or tools, within one year and three years, respectively, of their being sent out, to any of his

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the CGST Act pertains to valuation of taxable supplies, which would be the transaction value, i.e. the price actually paid or payable for the said supply of goods or services or both where the supplier and the recipient of the supply are not related and the price is the sole consideration for the supply. For the said purpose, the term 'related person' shall cover:
(i) officers or directors of one another 's businesses:
(ii) legally recognized partners in business;
(iii) employer and employee.
(iv) persons (including legal persons) who directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds twenty-five per cent or more of the outstanding voting slack or shares of both of them;
(v) one of them directly or indirectly controls the other:
(vi) bath of them are directly or indirectly controlled by a third person:
(vii) together they directly or indirectly control a third person: or they are members of the same family;
JSL and JEL would be treated as related persons on account o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

edit of the GST payable on charges paid to JEL (subject to the underlying provisions of the GST legislation). Accordingly, the value attributable to the Job Work charges could be construed as the transaction value for levy of GST.
3. RELEVANT CLAUSES OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN JEL AND JSL
Illustrative clauses, which would be a part of the contractual agreement are given below:
3.1. Key Definitions
Inputs – inputs means Coal, or any other supplies that are required by JEL, for provision of Job Work services in terms hereto, the agreed grade, characteristics and specifications of Inputs to he delivered by JSL, under this Agreement are at Annexure
Job Work Services- means the activity of processing Inputs supplied by JSL produce Products], being more particularly described in Annexure, pursuant to this Agreement and the relevant Instructions.
Power – Power shall mean electrical output generated in MW terms.
Product- Product includes power – in addition to the fly ash and other result

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l Inputs delivered to JEL its transfer is lawful, and at the time of delivery such Inputs will be free and clear of any lien, claim. demand, security Interest or other encumbrance.
JSL Shall retain title to and risk of loss with respect la the Inputs supplied to JEL.
3.5. Loading and Delivery
JSL shall supply the Inputs, as may he agreed between the Parties at such time as would enable JEL to comply with the Instructions Delivery Procedures and detailed operational procedures to ensure smooth delivery to and loading of Inputs shall be agreed in writing between the authorised representatives of the parties.
3.6. Measurement of Quantity
The quantity of Inputs supplied shall be as weighed on JSL's 's [electronic weighbridges]. A representative of JEL may be present to witness the weighment. If the [weighbridges] fail, weight will he determined on mutually agreed volume to weight conversion basis.
JEL at its expense, shall procure, install, own and maintain two sets of Metering

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he above are only relevant extracts from the underlying Job Work Agreement which have been reproduced to substantiate the arrangement of the Principal and the Job Worker.
4. SUBMISSIONS OF THE APPLICANT
4.1. At the outset, it is submitted that traditionally the concept of job work, which has evolved over the period clearly signifies that the same involves undertaking certain processing activities in respect of the goods supplied by the Principal, resulting in intermediate/ finished product. A Job Worker typically works on behalf of and for the owner of goods on which the Job Work is being undertaken who is also termed as Principal.
THE ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY THE APPLICANT FALL WITHIN THE AMBIT OF THE TERM 'JOB WORK' AS DEFINED UNDER THE CGST ACT
4.2. As per the provisions of the CGST Act mentioned above in paragraph 2.1, for treatment or process undertaken by a person to be termed as a 'Job Work', the said treatment or process should be undertaken on the goods belon

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

efined under the GST laws, reliance is placed on various dictionary meanings and judicial precedents in this regard:
* GST v. Samodar Padmanath Rao [1968 (22) STC 187 (Bom)]: = 1968 (2) TMI 102 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT “One of the meanings that can be given to the word 'process' is subject to a particular method or technique of preparation handling, or other treatment designed to affect a particular result”
* Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.Ex., Haldia [2006 (197) E.L.T. 97 (Tri.. Del.)] = 2005 (1) TMI 306 – CESTAT, NEW DELHI: In this case, it has been held that the term 'processing' a much wider term
“ln the expressions “further processing” and “any other purpose” mentioned in Rule 4(5)(a) are fairly wide and would take their colour from the processes mentioned in the definition of 'input'. As such the generation of power or steam as intermediate products would fall the scope of these expression, and would amount to the Job Work”
* S.B. Sarkar's Wor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

9; as under:
“(52) “goods” means every kind of movable properly other than money and securities but includes actionable growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply”
4.6. As mentioned above, in the present case, the inputs used by the Applicant for generating power are coal or any other inputs which are supplied by JSL and consumed for the generation of power. Coal or any other inputs used by the Applicant for generation of power are movable property. Therefore, in the present case these inputs i.e. coal or any other inputs can be considered as a 'goods'.
GOODS USED FOR GENERATION OF POWER BY run APPLICANT BELONG TO JSL
4.7. In terms of the third condition, the goods should belong to JSL and should be provided to the Applicant for undertaking the activity of generation of power. Reference is also sought to the agreement between JEL and JSL, the relevant clauses of which have been s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rdingly, the activity undertaken by JEL on behalf of JSL would be classifiable as a Job Work activity.
4.9 The Applicant submits that there is no iota of doubt that the coal and the other inputs belongs to JSL and the ownership of the same always remain with JSL only.
BRINGING BACK THE INPUTS
Under the GST regime, the condition pertaining to return of inputs to the Principal is mentioned in paragraph 4.2. The same is in the line with the erstwhile CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. For a better understanding of the scope of this condition, reference Gg to the judgment Of the Apex Court in the matter of Prestige Engineering (India) Limited vs Collector of Central Excise, [1994 (73) ELT 497 (S.C.)] = 1994 (9) TMI 66 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA where the Supreme Court observed that initiating upon the same articles being returned to the customer after undergoing the manufacturing process at the hands of the Job Worker may rob the notification of any substance whatsoever'. The above principle was

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

put services used by Wind mills to generate energy which is made available to the manufacturer through power board under the barter system, has been allowed. The Tribunal at Chennai in the matter of DCW Ltd vs. Commissioner of C.Ex, Triunelveli [2016 (332) ELT 142(Tri-Chennai) = 2015 (10) TMI 1929 – CESTAT CHENNAI land in the matter of The India Cements Ltd and Others vs CCE , Salem and Others [2015-TIOL-(982-CESTAT-MAD] = 2015 (6) TMI 580 – CESTAT CHENNAI also followed the above principle. Relevant extract of the India Cement Ltd case is reproduced as follows:
Our view above is fortified from the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Central excise appeal No. 14/012 in the case of CCE, Aurangahad Endurance Technology disposed 02.12.2014. The Hon'ble Court examining the meaning of 'input' under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and admissibility of credit of tax on such input held that there should not be inadmissibility of input credit on input or input services used by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

humbly submits that a job work arrangement would be in the nature of a supply of service. Entry 3 of the said schedule is reproduced as follows:
'Any Treatment or process which is applied to another person's goods is a supply of services.'
4.14. On the basis of the above, it is respectfully submitted that for the generation of power from coal, the following processes are undertaken by the Applicant:
* A machine called a pulverizer grinds the coal into a fine powder.
* The coal powder mixes with hot air, which helps the coal burn more efficiently, and the mixture moves to the furnace.
* The burning coal heats water in a boiler, creating steam.
* Steam released from the boiler powers an engine called a turbine, transforming heat energy from burning coal into mechanical energy that spins the turbine engine
* The spinning turbine is used to power a generator, a machine that turns mechanical energy into electric energy. This happens when magnets inside a copper coil in the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

quired to bring back inputs after completion of job work or otherwise, within a period of one year of they being sent out without payment of tax. In the said context, the Applicant has submitted under paragraphs 4. 10 to 4.12 of this Application that the subject transaction is in accordance with the prescribed conditions of the job worker arrangement whereby inputs (i.e. coal) is being returned to the Principal.
4.17. For determining the applicability of GST on Job Work charges, reference is sought paragraphs 4.13 and 4.14 of this document. In the said context, it is humbly submitted that a job worker is engaged in supplying a service specified under Schedule II of the CGST Act and accordingly GST would be applicable on the said job worker charges.
4.18 In addition to the above, for the purpose of determining the value of job work charges subject to GST, reference is sought to Rule 28 of the CGST Rules mentioned under paragraphs 2.9 and 2.10 of this application, which pertains to val

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

trued accordingly
Basis the aforesaid definition, any 'treatment' or 'process' undertaken on goods belonging to another person Shall be construed as a job work activity.
1.2 Since the terms 'treatment' or 'process' have not been defined under the GST legislation, reference is sought to the dictionary mining which explain the said terms and are reproduced as follows:
Process:
* a natural or involuntary operation or series of changes; handle or deal with by a particular process'
* a systematic series of actions directed to some end;
Treatment:
* Submission to the action of a chemical, physical or biological agent”
* subjection to some agent or action”
1.3 In addition to the above, reference is also sought to judicial precedents wherein the aforesaid terms have been explained. In the matter of Collector of Central Excise vs Rajasthan State Chemicals Works – 1991 (55) E.LT. 444 (SC), = 1991 (9) TMI 73 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA the Supreme Court exam

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ndling and there may be a process which involves no handling or not merely handling but use or also use. It may be a process Involving the handling of the malarial and it need not be a process involving the use of material…
1.4 In light of the above cited meanings and judicial interpretation, it is submitted that the term process is wide enough to cover even a mere handling of materials. Considering the scope of the said term, the Company humbly submits that the activities proposed to be carried out by the Company would fall within the ambit of the term 'process' or treatment'.
1.5. In addition to the above, the other pre-requisite for categorizing the proposed activity as a 'job work' would be the said treatment or process is required to be undertaken on goods belonging to another person. As per the proposed arrangement, coal would be supplied by the Principal (i.e. JSW Steel Ltd) to the Company for the purpose of carrying out the specified processes for genera

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s called 'principal'.
This definition is much wider than the one given in Notification No. 214/86-CE dated 23rd March, 1986. In the said notification, job work has been defined in such a manner so as to ensure That the activity of Job work must amount to manufacture. Thus the definition of job work itself reflects the change in basic scheme of taxation relating to job work in the proposed GST regime.
2.2. Based on the above, the Company humbly submits that the tax authorities have sought to differentiate the ambit of the term job work as existing under the GST regime, when compared to the pre-GST era. Under the GST regime, the definition seeks to cover a wider scope of services provided by the job worker, However, the Company humbly submits that its proposed activities would squarely be covered under the definitions of the term job work as existing under the pre-GST regime and accordingly the same should not be interpreted in a restrictive manner under the GST legislation.
3. P

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

se of a job work activity would be governed by Section 143 and subjected to the conditions mentioned therein. Further the Company humbly submits that the legislature does not exclude related parties from entering into a job work arrangement,
4. APPLICABLE JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS
4.1. Without prejudice to the above submissions, the Company humbly submits before Your Honor certain judicial precedents wherein the facts arc squarely applicable to the present application. These can be cited as follows:
* Commissioner Central Excise vs Indorama Textiles Ltd. [2010 (260) ELT 382 (Bom HC)] = 2009 (10) TMI 571 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT
* Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. vs. CCE, Haldia [2006 (197) ELT 97 (Tri-Delhi) = 2005 (1) TMI 306 – CESTAT, NEW DELHI
* Sanghi Industries Limited vs CCE, Rajkot [2006(206) ELT 575 (Tri-Delhi)] = 2006 (4) TMI 422 – CESTAT, NEW DELHI
* Sanghi Industries Limited vs CCE, Rajkot [2014 (302) ELT 564 (Tri.-Ahmd.)] = 2014 (2) TMI 278 – CESTAT AHMEDABAD
A copy of the aforesaid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

payable only on the Job Work charges charged by the Company.”
03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
SUPPLY OF COAL OR ANY OTHER INPUTS ON A JOB WORK BASIS BY JSL TO JEL
JSL intend to supply the inputs 'coal' to JEL on job work basis to convert coal into electrical energy and pay job-work charges to receive electricity from JEL
The term 'job work' has been defined under Section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017 as
“job work means any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person and the expression jab-worker shall be construed accordingly.
And the provisions governing job work procedure are set out in Section 143 of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore the scope and meaning of the term 'job work' has to be decided by taking into account provisions governing the job work procedure.
Job work procedure.
143. (1) A registered person (hereafter in this section re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ccordance with the provisions of this clause unless the said principal declares the place of business of the job worker as his additional place of business except in a case-
(i) where the job worker is registered under section 25; or
(ii) where the principal is engaged in the supply of such goods as may be notified by the Commissioner.
(2) The responsibility for keeping proper accounts for the inputs or capital goods shall lie with the principal.
(3) Where the inputs sent for job work are not received back by the principal after completion of job work or otherwise in accordance with the provisions of clause (a) of sub-section (1) or are not supplied from the place of business of the job worker in accordance with the provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (1) within a period of one year of their being sent out, it shall be deemed that such inputs had been supplied by the principal to the job worker on the day when the said inputs were sent out.
(4) Where the capital goods, other

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

above legal provisions read together, it implies that in job work the job worker can undertake any treatment or process on goods belonging to another registered person and after job work such goods must necessarily be returned to the principal. In another words the goods supplied by the principal to be treated and processed upon by the job worker and processed goods to be returned to the principal- Though in the definition of job work it is specified that the job worker can undertake any process or treatment, the provisions governing the job work procedure are the deciding factor to qualify whether any process or treatment amount to job work. And the basic underlying principal of job work is that the goods sent for job work may be subjected to any process or treatment but said goods after such treatment/process must be returned to the principal. Both the definition of Job Work given in Section 2(68) of CGST Act, 2017 and the procedure in Section 143(a) of the CGST Act, 2017 should be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be returned back to the principal coal ash/residue can not be deemed as processed goods.
One illustrative example of job work on coal is conversion of coal into Coke. Coal can be subjected to destructive distillation to be converted into Coke. This process satisfies the definition of 'job-work' as well as the governing provisions stipulated u/s 143 are followed. Unlike the instant case where Coal is consumed in the boiler to generate steam which in turn is used in the generation/manufacture of a new commodity 'electricity' falling under CSH No 2716 0000. And the new commodity 'electricity' is supplied back to the principal. It is expected in job work that goods supplied by the principal undergo 'treatment/process' at job worker's end and after such treatment/job work they are returned to the principal. The process undertaken by JEL traverse well beyond the scope of the term 'job work'. It is more than job work.
This office is of the view t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e transaction which would be on the lines thus-
* JSW Steel Limited (JSL) and JSW Energy Limited (JEL), as the applicant informs, are related persons on account of direct or indirect control over each other.
* JEL, the applicant, is engaged in the business of generation of power. The applicant's power plant is divided into four units.
* JSL is engaged in the manufacture and supply of steel. JSL requires power on a continuous and dedicated basis, for manufacturing steel at its steel plant. For the said purpose, JSL and JEL proposed to enter into a Job Work Agreement pertaining to Unit III and Unit IV of the power plant which are in the nature of a captive power plant.
* In terms of the proposed agreement, JSL would supply coal or any other inputs to JEL on a free-of-cost basis. On receipt of the same, JEL would undertake certain processes to convert the said inputs into power. In accordance with the Job Work Agreement, the title to the coal or any other inputs along with the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pply of power by JEL to JSL
3. Job work charges payable to JEL by JSL
We proceed with the issue thus –
The applicant before us is JEL. We refer to the GST Act to understand the mechanism of an Advance Ruling wherein clause (a) of section 95 says that –
“95. In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a) “advance ruling” means a decision provided by the Authority or the Appellate Authority to an applicant on matters or on questions specified in sub-section (2) of section 97 or sub-section (1) of section 100, in relation to the supply of goods or services or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant;
As can be seen the ruling is in respect of the supply undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. If this is the case then we see that the question no.1 as posed before us pertains to supply by JSL and not JEL, the applicant. In view thereof, the same cannot be entertained by us. Further, during hearing, the applicant has also acce

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al or any other inputs and after processing these, the output is electricity which is supplied to JSL. As an immediate observation, we have to say that the goods sent for job work are coal and after the so claimed process of 'job work' by JEL, the new product 'electricity' comes into existence. It is very apparent that the goods which are received after job work are in no way identifiable with the goods which were sent for job work. Electricity is a totally new commodity which will be delivered to JSL. To ascertain whether conversion of coal into electricity would tantamount to being 'job work', we need to examine the relevant provisions under the GST. We find that the definition of job work under GST Act is as under –
“(68) “job work” means any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person and the expression “job worker” shall be construed accordingly:
As can be seen the definition calls for application of a treat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to unacceptable consequences. It is not the intend to treat and regard manufacturing activities as processing. Manufacturing, as is understood, means a series of processes through different stages in which the raw material is subjected to change by different operations, (For difference between process and manufacturing see CIT v. Tara Agencies [CIT v. Tara Agencies, (2007) 6 SCC 429], = 2007 (7) TMI 4 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. v. State of M.P. [Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. v. State of M.P., (2006) 12 SCC 468] = 2006 (11) TMI 320 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA and Aspinwall Co. Ltd. v CIT [Aspinwall & co. Ltd. v. CIT, (2001) 7 SCC 525].) = 2001 (9) TMI 3 – SUPREME Court
21. The words “crushing”, “treating” and “transporting” are words of narrower significance and the word “processing” used between these words should not be given a very wide meaning, for the legislative intent, according to us, is narrower. The word 'processing' would take its meaning

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t is liable to pay electricity tariff at a lower rate. The intent and purpose is certainly not to compel and force a manufacturing unit being set up at an acceptable distance from the mine, for the manufacturing unit adjacent to the mine would have to pay electricity tariff at a higher rate. Pertinently, a manufacturing unit set up by another entity, whether adjacent to the mine or not, would pay a lower tariff Such absurdity and irrationality has to be avoided. In the present context, we would, therefore, hold “processing” would mean activities in order to make the mineral mined marketable, saleable and transportable, without substantially changing the identity of the mineral, as mined When there is a substantial change at the mineral mined and the process results in a different commodity being produced or transforming and completely changing the mineral, it would fall outside the scope of the word “processing”. The restricted construction will also be acceptable in view of the use of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

processing of raw material or inputs in any manner that results in emergence of a new product having a distinct name, character and use and the term “manufacturer” shall be construed accordingly;”
As can be seen the definition itself says that the emergence of a new product from the processing of the inputs would be a manufactured product. In the instant case the end product i.e., “electricity” has a distinct name, character and use than the inputs i.e., “coal”. Thus, when the Legislature has provided for the definition of 'job work' as well as 'manufacture', the meaning as understood by the definition of 'manufacture' cannot be read into the words 'treatment or process' as found in the definition of 'job work'. 'Treatment', *Process' and 'Manufacture' are three different activities recognized by the Legislature. The intent of the Legislature is to restrict the scope of 'job work' to 'treatment' or 'proces

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

irit, commonly known as petrol, used in or in relation to the manufacture of final product whether directly or indirectly and whether contained in the final product or not, and includes accessories of the final products the final products cleared along with final products goods used as paint, or as packing material, or as fuel or for generation of electricity or steam used for manufacture of final products or for any other purpose within the factory of production and also includes lubricating oils, greases. cutting oils and coolants.”
As can be seen, the processes involved in the above cases required that the inputs used may or may not have been found in the final product. The facts before us and the applicable provisions are different than those found in the case laws relied upon by the applicant. Further, we observe that the facts and applicable provisions being unambiguous, we do not feel the need to comment or discuss the other case laws and provisions as relied upon by the applic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1),-
(a) activities or transactions specified in Schedule III; or
(b) such activities or transactions undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities, as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council, shall be treated neither as a supply of goods nor supply of services.
(3) Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2), the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, specify, by notification, the transactions that are to be treated as-
(a) a supply of goods and not as a supply of services; or
(b) a supply of services and not as a supply of goods.
It can be seen that sub-section (2) begins with the word “notwithstanding” and sub-section (3) begins with the words “Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2)”. The way the sub-sectio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods on behalf of the principal; or
(b) by an agent to his principal where the agent undertakes to receive such goods on behalf of the principal.
4. Import of services by a taxable person from a related person or from any of his other establishments outside India, in the course or furtherance of business.”
Para 2 of the Schedule I is about supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between distinct persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or furtherance of business. Further, the Explanation to section 15 explains 'related persons' thus –
“Explanation.-For the purposes of this Act,-
(a) persons shall be deemed to be “related persons” if-
(i) such persons are officers or directors of one another 's businesses;
(ii) such persons are legally recognised partners in business;
(iii) such persons are employer and employee;
(iv) any person directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds twenty-five percent. or more of the outst

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods and not a 'job work'. And hence, the question does not survive.
In view of all above deliberations, the questions can be answered thus –
05. In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows :
ORDER
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-05/2017/B-08
Mumbai, dt. 05/03/2018
For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are answered thus –
Q.1 Applicability of GST on supply of coal or any other inputs on a job work basis by JSL to JEL
A. This question pertains to supply JSL and not JEL, the applicant. In view thereof, the same is not entertained.
Q.2 Applicability of GST on supply of power by JEL to JSL.
A. This question is answered in the affirmative.
Q.3 Applicability of GST on job work charges payable to JEL by JSL.
A. The transaction between JEL and JSL is a transaction of supply of goods and not a 'job wo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Oriental Metals India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant State Tax Officer And State Tax Officer State Goods And Service Tax Department, Kochi

Oriental Metals India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant State Tax Officer And State Tax Officer State Goods And Service Tax Department, Kochi
GST
2018 (3) TMI 1018 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-3-2018
W. P. (C. ) No. 5955 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. K.N. Sreekumaran, Smt.V.P.Seena Devi And Sri.P.J.Anilkumar
For The Respondent : Sri. V. K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is aggrieved by the conduct of the first

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Plymark India (P) Limited Versus The Assistant State Tax Officer, Karukutty, The Commissioner of State Tax, Thiruvananthapuram And The Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, New Delhi

M/s. Plymark India (P) Limited Versus The Assistant State Tax Officer, Karukutty, The Commissioner of State Tax, Thiruvananthapuram And The Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, New Delhi
GST
2018 (3) TMI 901 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-3-2018
W. P. (C) No. 7424 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. Aji v. Dev
For The Respondent : Sri. Rajesh B., Sri.V.K. Shamsudheen And Sreelal N. Warrier, SC
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the first respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act.
2. It is seen that an identical matter has been disposed of by a Divi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Hindalco Industries Limited Versus The Union of India & Others

Hindalco Industries Limited Versus The Union of India & Others
GST
2018 (3) TMI 538 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – TMI
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-3-2018
WRIT PETITION NO. 11403 OF 2016, CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 534 OF 2017
GST
S. C. Dharmadhikari And Prakash D. Naik, JJ.
Mr. V. Sridharan, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/by PDS Legal for the Petitioner
Mr. Swapnil Bangur a/w Shalaka A. Gujar Karande for Respondent
ORDER
P. C.
We have heard on earlier occasion Mr. Prakash Shah and today Mr. Sridharan, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Bangur appearing for the Respondents.
2 There is an affidavit-in-reply filed in terms of our earlier directions. Mr. Sridharan, on instructions, states t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

evision Authority. If the petitioner succeeds then amount of Rs. 5,07,59,409/included in eight Rebate orders sanctioned by Deputy Commissioner (Rebate) that is already with the Petitioner gets approval of Revision Authority and no further action will be taken by the department for recovery of said amount. However, if the Petitioner fails then the Petitioner is required to pay Rs. 5,07,59,409/to the department and claim equivalent amount as credit. But in view of Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017, this amount is to be paid in cash. Thus, even if Petitioner fails no action will be taken by the department for recovery of said amount in view of enactment of transitional provisions under the CGST Act. Hence there is no gain to either the petition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Subject: Refund of IGST on Export– Invoice mis-match cases –Alternative Mechanism with Officer Interface – reg.

Subject: Refund of IGST on Export– Invoice mis-match cases –Alternative Mechanism with Officer Interface – reg.
08 /2018 Dated:- 5-3-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, PANAMBUR, MANGALURU – 575 010
customsmangalore.gov.in
Phone No: 0824-2408164
E-Mail ID: commr-cusmnglr@nic.in
Fax No: 0824-2407100
F.NO.S-26/04/2016 Cus Tech
Date: 05.03.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 08 /2018
Subject: Refund of IGST on Export- Invoice mis-match cases -Alternative Mechanism with Officer Interface – reg.
Attention of the Importers, Exporter, Customs Brokers, Steamer Agents, Liners and the members of Trade is invited to the Board's Circular No. 05/2018- Customs dated 23.02.2018, on the above mentioned subject.
2. Numerous representations have been received from exporters / trade associations seeking resolution of various problems which have hindered the sanction of refund of IGST paid on exports. CBEC has issued Circular No. 42 / 2017 dated 0

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tober 2017 indicates that while the quantum of errors is decreasing significantly, exporters are still committing mistakes in the information furnished to (i) GSTN while filing GSTR 1 / Table 6A or GSTR 3B and (ii) Customs EDI system while filing Shipping Bill. The pre-requisites and precautions that need to be taken for successful processing of refund claims are as follows:
(i) Exporters have to file GSTR 3B with taxable value for export and IGST paid against exports indicated in appropriate fields.
(ii) Exporters have to file GSTR 1 or Table 6A for the exports made with correct details such as Invoice number, Taxable value, IGST paid, Shipping Bill number, shipping date and Port code. Large number of exporters have filed incomplete GSTR 1 or Table 6A where shipping bill number or date or port code are missing. These records are not processed / forwarded to Customs by GSTN. E- mails have been sent to exporters asking them to correct their records through amendment process of GSTR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

exporter while filing GST returns.
(v) Exporters may be advised to use Table 9 of GSTR 1 of the following month to amend the records of previous month so as to take care of issues mentioned in paras (ii) and (iii) above. In cases where exporters have already filed information through Table 9 of GSTR 1, the said information is being validated by GSTN. The validated information is expected to be forwarded by GSTN to Customs by mid- March 2018 for further processing.
(vi) The records (i.e GSTR 1 or Table 6A) which have been forwarded by GSTN to Customs after validations mentioned at (ii) and (iii) above are processed by the Customs EDI system. In cases where the information forwarded by GSTN tallies with the information furnished in shipping bills, refunds are automatically sanctioned by Customs EDI system. As mentioned earlier, till date about ₹ 4000 Crore has been sanctioned as refund of IGST paid.
(vii) However, there are many instances where refunds are held up on Customs

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gate.gov.in/Download/New_Registration_Demo_Updated_APP ROV ED.pdf
Registration Advisory link:
https://www.icegate.gov.in/Download/v1.2_Advisory_Registration_APPROVE D.pdf
Java set up for the DSC upload:
https://www.icegate.gov.in/Download/JavaSetupForDSC.pdf
Once the registration is obtained, the exporters can check the status of IGST refunds associated with their exports and the corresponding error message, if any. This enquiry takes GSTIN Number, Port-code and Return Month as inputs and based on the input, Shipping Bill number, Shipping Bill date, return month, invoice number, invoice date, response code and Processed date is displayed as a result of the enquiry. The records displayed are those that have been received from GSTN and processed by the Customs Automated System.
(ix) The analysis of Customs data indicates that while most of the errors mentioned in para (vi) above are decreasing, the error mentioned at (c) in para (vii) is most prevalent. The error mentioned at

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and sanction refund in those cases where invoice details provided in GSTR 1/ Table 6A are correct though the said details provided in the shipping bill were at variance. It is pertinent to note that refund claims would be processed in only those cases where the error code is mentioned as SB005. Further, it may also be noted that all refunds shall continue to be credited electronically through the PFMS system, and no manual payment / cheque should be issued. The procedure for processing of IGST refund claims in these cases would be as follows:
a. The exporter shall provide a concordance table indicating mapping between GST invoices and corresponding Shipping Bill invoices, as annexed in support of the refund claim to the designated officer in the Custom house. A scanned copy of concordance table may also be sent to dedicated email address of Customs location from where exports took place.
b. Customs EDI system shall display list of all the invoices pertaining to such SBs vis-a-vis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amount to the officer for approval.
e. Invoices in any particular GSTR 1 where refund is sanctioned shall be disabled in the system to prevent refund against same invoice in future.
f. Once refund is sanctioned by the officer, the shipping bills would be available for generating scroll as per normal process.
6. In order to ensure smooth operation of the prescribed procedure, this Custom House has opened a dedicated cell for the purpose of IGST refund, as under:
Name of the Officers: Shri Avezeb D'souza, Assistant Commissioner (Drawback) and Shri Mahalinga Naik, Superintendent (Drawback)
E-mail id: commr-cusmnglr@nic.in
7. This procedure is available only for Shipping Bills filed till 31st December 2017.
8. Difficulties, if any, may be brought to the notice of this office. It is again emphasized that Board is taking all possible steps to alleviate the difficulties associated with IGST refunds. However, ultimately it is the responsibility of the exporters to ensure careful and c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Joint Venture – taxable services provided by the members of the Joint Venture (JV) to the JV and vice versa and inter se between the members of the JV-reg.

Joint Venture – taxable services provided by the members of the Joint Venture (JV) to the JV and vice versa and inter se between the members of the JV-reg.
35/9/2018 Dated:- 5-3-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
Circular No. 35/9/2018-GST
F. No. B-1/20/2016-TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Tax research Unit
****
Room No. 146G, North Block,
New Delhi, 5th March 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/ Principal Commissioners/ Commissioner of Central Tax (All) /
The Principal Director Generals/ Director Generals (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Joint Venture taxable services provided by the members of the Joint Venture (JV) to the JV and vice versa and inter se between the members of the JV-reg
I am directed to say that in the Service Tax regime, CBEC vide Circular No. 179/5/2014 – ST issued from F.No. 179/5/2014-ST dated 24 September 2014 had clarified that if cash calls are merely transaction in money, then they ar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

standing of the taxation of transactions involving taxable services between the JV and its members or inter-se between the members of a JV. Therefore, officers in the field formations were advised to carefully examine the leviability of service tax with reference to the specific terms/clauses of each JV agreement.
2. In the Service Tax Law, service was defined as an activity carried out by a person for another for consideration [Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act 1994]. Explanation 3 to the said definition stated than an unincorporated association or a body of persons as the case may be, and a member thereof shall be treated as distinct persons.
3. GST is levied on intra-State and inter-State supply of goods and services. According to section 7 of CGST Act, 2017, the expression “supply” includes all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dy of persons (AOP) to a member thereof for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration shall be treated as supply of services. The above entry in Schedule II is analogous to and draws strength from the provision in Article 366(29A)(e) of the Constitution according to which a tax on the sale or purchase of goods includes a tax on the supply of goods by any unincorporated association or body of persons to a member thereof for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration.
4. Therefore, the law with regard to levy of GST on service supplied by member of an unincorporated joint venture (JV) to the JV or to other members of the JV, or by JV to the members, essentially remains the same as it was under service tax law. Thus, it is clarified that the clarification given vide Board Circular No. 179/5/2014 – ST dated 24.09.2014 ibid in the context of service tax is applicable for the purpose of levy of GST also. It is reiterated that the question whether cash calls are taxa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

New Circular Clarifies GST Rules for Specific Services Under CGST to Streamline Compliance and Improve Stakeholder Understanding.

New Circular Clarifies GST Rules for Specific Services Under CGST to Streamline Compliance and Improve Stakeholder Understanding.
Circulars
GST
Clarifications regarding GST in respect of cert

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rate of GST on works contract

Rate of GST on works contract
Query (Issue) Started By: – SRIKANTA MOHAPATRA Dated:- 3-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 4-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
The following query may be replied.
1) whether the reduced rate of GST from 18% to 12 % is applicable for all works contract , job contract AMC of machines , awarded by public sector undertaking like HAL.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Reduced rate is for Govt.constructions.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Rep

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Fermi solar Farms Private ltd

In Re : Fermi solar Farms Private ltd
GST
2018 (5) TMI 963 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 35 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 66 G S.T.R. 337 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 3-3-2018
No. GST-ARA-03/2017/B- 03
GST
Shri B.V. Borhade, joint Commissioner of state tax And Shri Pankaj Kumar joint Commissioner of  central tax
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
No. GST-ARA-03/2017/B- 03     Mumbai, dt. 03/03/2018s
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Fermi Solar Farms Private Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :
* Whether in case of separate contracts for supply of goods and servic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ENTION – AS PER THE APPLICANT
The submissions, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
[A] AS SUBMITTED ALONGWITH APPLICATION
“Statement of the relevant facts having a bearing on the aforesaid clarification(s)/transaction(s)
1. M/s. Fermi Solar Farms Private Ltd. (hereinafter called as “Fermi”) is engaged in operation of renewable energy power plant projects. These typically include operation of solar power plants set up across India for generation and distribution of electricity generated. Fermi is emerging as a leading builder of renewable energy projects.
2. Fermi is established under Independent Power Producer ('IPP') category for setting up and sale of power produced from Fermi's power plant to third party.
3. In setting up of a solar power generation plant, the following steps are involved:-
* Soil and Topo Survey
* Plant coordinate fixing. Boundary fencing and Plant layout
* T/L Survey, Piling, Building Construction
* Structure erection, inverter er

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ply
* Transmission Line Supply
* AC/DC Cables
* Chain Link Fencing
* Battery Charger '
* Power Transformer
* LD Switchgear and complete switchyard
* Inverter transformers and auxiliary transformers
* Battery and battery charger
* SCADA system
* Module cleaning system
* Illumination and ventilation system
* Earthing system
* Site enabling facilities
* Mandatory spares
6. As part of the services contract, various services are provided including the following:
* Construction of complete buildings including control rooms and inverter rooms, roads and drainage system, boundary walls/fencing, bore walls
* All civil and foundation works for switchyard, solar plant and all other equipment
* Site enabling facilities
* Leveling and grading
* Erection, commissioning and testing for solar modules, mounting structures, power transformers, inverters, SCADA, complete switchyard, inverter transformers, connectors, earthing lines etc.
7. Please note that the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te) (The notification is attached herewith as Annexure -A), dated 28th Jun 2017, Solar power, generating systems and parts for their manufacture are taxable at 5%. The relevant entry read as follows:
Chapter Heading
Description
84 Or 85 Or 94
Following renewable energy devices and parts for their manufacture
 
a)
Bio-gas plant
 
b)
Solar power based devices
 
c)
Solar power generating system
 
d)
Wind mills and wind operated electricity generator
 
e)
Waste to energy plants/devices
 
f)
Solar lantern/solar lamp
 
g)
Ocean waves/tidal waves energy devices/plants
 
h)
Photo voltaic cells, whether or not assembled in modules or made up into panels
 
Per the above, concessional rate of 5% has been provided to the following (when covered under heading 84, 85 or 94):
* PV modules
* Solar power generating system – This term has not been defined
* Parts for manufacture of solar power generating system and PV modul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lain reading of the definition of composite supply, it emerges that the following conditions must be satisfied for a supply to qualify as a “composite supply”:-
* the supplies being made must be taxable supplies
* the supplies should be naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business
* there must be a principal supply
1.4 Our understanding in present context
Per the above legal provisions, we understand that in present case, since there are separate contracts for supply of goods and services, the taxability should be as under:
* Contract for goods wherein solar PV modules are also supplied- Entire contract should qualify as supply of solar power generating system and should be taxable at 5%
* Contract for goods wherein solar PV modules are not supplied – In such case, the goods which qualify as parts of solar power generating system and are covered under heading 84,85 or 94 should be eligible to concessional rate of 5%
* C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he system is defined in Chambers 20th Century Dictionary as “anything formed of parts placed together or adjusted into a regular and connected whole”. Hence, system typically includes various components/ parts which are manufactured/assembled together for performing a function.
2.4 Further, under erstwhile law also, solar power generating systems have not been defined. However, under erstwhile excise law, various exemptions were extended to non-conventional energy devices which included solar power generating systems – List 8 of Notification no. 12/2012-Central Excise, Dated 17th March 2012.
2.5 Since 'Solar Power Generating System' has not been defined in the present law, in order to understand the ambit of the said system, judicial pronouncement under the Excise law can be examined.
2.6 Reference is made to the judgment of Delhi Tribunal in the case of Rajasthan Electronics & instruments Ltd. vs. Commr. Of C. Ex., Jaipur wherein it was held that '7. The adjudicating author

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

constitutes solar power generating system as it performs the function of generating the required high frequency AC power from Sun-light with, the help of SPV module and supplying it to the compact fluorescent lamp of a solar lantern. In view of the above, expert opinion, we hold that the impugned item can be considered as solar power generating system and is entitled for the benefit of the exemption Notification. Therefore, we allow the appeal with consequential relief.”
2.8 In M/s Phenix Construction Technology vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ahmedabad-II [2017-TIOL-3281-CESTAT-AHM] the question under consideration was whether the structures and parts of structures cleared for initial setting up of solar power plant are eligible for the benefit of Notification 15/2010-CE. The point of dispute in the said case law was that whether the aforesaid goods would qualify as components of the solar power plant. Hon'ble CESTAT has decided that the items required for in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

so supported by the concept of 'composite supply' in which case the taxability is as per the principal supply.
2.12 Composite Supply has been defined as 'composite supply means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply;
2.13 Further, Principal Supply has been defined in Section 2(90) of the CGST Act as 'Principal supply means the supply of goods or services which constitutes the predominant element of a composite supply and to which any other supply forming part of that composite supply is ancillary'. Thus, principal supply refers to the supply which is the predominant element in a composite supply.
2.14 In terms of Section 8 of the CGST Act, it has been clarified that a composite supply comprising two or more suppli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

NRE as well.
3. Taxability of parts of solar power generating system
3.1 In certain cases, not all parts of solar power generating system are supplied by EPC contractors (as some parts may be procured separately). For example, PV modules may be procured by the Project Developer directly and only balance contract is awarded to EPC contractor for supply of remaining goods .
In such case, even though the entire contract may not qualify as solar power supplied should be eligible to concessional rate of 5% as the entry covers 'Renewable energy device and parts for their manufacture'.
3.2 A 'part' is essentially a section, which, when combined with other sections, make up a whole system/product.'
In the case of equipment, various parts would combine to make up the whole equipment, which has a specific function.
3.3 Compared to a 'part', an accessory is essentially a piece which enhances the functionality of equipment and adds to the function of the equipmen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eld that specific goods supplied for such generators would also be eligible for the exemptions extended to the generators as 'wind operated electricity generator.'
* In Gemini Instratech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik [2014 (300) ELT 446 (Tri. -Mum)] the issue involved was whether doors specifically designed to be used with tower on which wind operated electricity generators are installed be eligible for benefit of notification which provides exemption form payment of excise duty to wind operated electricity generators and its components and parts thereof. It was held that such doors would also be eligible for the exemption. This was also ratified by the Supreme Court [2015 (315) ELT A82 (SC)]
* In Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs [1998 (103) ELT 395 (Tri)] the issue was whether power cables, earthing cables, wind farmer computer will be eligible for benefit of exemption under Notification No. 64/94 – Cus. The Tribunal held that

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ectricity generators and will be eligible for exemption.
In regard to the above, though there has not been any judgment with respect to components of solar power plants, on similar lines of the precedents discussed above for wind power, the components of solar power generating system should also be covered under concessional rate of taxes under GST.
3.7 It is submitted that generation of power by way of solar energy is one of the key promoters for the Government's aspiration of 'Make in India'. The Government has set target of 175 GW of renewable power by 2022 which includes 100 GW of solar power. Per “Make in India” website set up by the Government of India, india's annual solar installations would grow four times by 2017. If the goods supplied under the contract for construction of solar plants is taxed at separate rates applicable on the individual goods, it would lead to higher tax burden on the developer of the solar power plants. Please note that since electrici

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

does not specify the persons who would be eligible for concessional rate of 5% i. e. developer, EPC contractor or manufacturer/ supplier/ sun-contractor.
4.3 Since the concessional rate of 5% is provided to renewable energy products and parts thereof, the same should be applicable to all suppliers providing such products as long as it can be established (through certification or otherwise) that these are to be used in solar power generation system. This would also be in line with practice under erstwhile excise law wherein benefit was extended to sub-contractors also through MNRE certification.
5. Taxability of contract for services
5.1 A separate contract is awarded to the EPC contractor for provision of services which consists of the following:-
* Construction of complete buildings including control rooms and inverter rooms, roads and drainage system, boundary walls/ fencing, bore walls
* All civil and foundation works for switchyard, solar plant and all other equipment
*

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as been deemed to be a service under GST and is taxable at 18% typically. In the present case, the above contract on a stand-alone basis should qualify as a works contract service, liable to GST at 18%.
6. Conclusion
6.1 Where there are two separate contracts – one for supply of goods to be used in solar power plant and one for services, both would be taxed separately
6.2 Contract for goods should qualify as 'solar power generating system' taxable at 5% and contract for services should qualify as works contract services taxable at 18%. For the contract of goods (where PV modules are also provided as part of the contract), the same should qualify as composite supply and all goods supplied should get covered as part of principal supply of 'solar power generating system' and taxable at 5% GST.
6.3 Even where contract of goods do not include all products (such as where PV modules are not supplied and are procured by developer on its own) and only balance products are su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erating system.
1) Solar panel consisting of solar cells, i.e. solar photovoltaic cells-
2) Inverter to convert DC power to AC power-
3) HT Switchgear, isolator, circuit breaker. Auxiliary transformer, main transformer-
4) Transmission line-
(II) Fermi solar farms Pvt. Ltd supplies following engineering and construction services to the buyer for setting up solar power generating system.
1. Earthing
2. Inverter Room
3. Cable routing
4. Solar panel foundation arrangement.
5. Arrangement of roads and drains.
(III) As per Notification dates 15.11.2017 chapter heading 84,85, or 94 following renewable energy device & Parts for their manufacture are taxed@ 5%
a. Bio-gas plant
b. solar power based devices
c. solar power generating system
d. wind mills, wind operated Electricity Generator
e. Waste to energy plants-
f. solar lantern/lamp
g. Ocean wave/tidal waves energy devices
h. Photo voltaic cells, whether or not assembled in modules or made up into panels.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

such situation supplier has to raise to separate invoices i.e. one for supply of goods and other for supply of services. The supplier is expecting separate consideration for each agreement. Again on page No.35 of the agreement. The condition will elaborate the same facts. It says “All the major equipment /material/items shall be procured by owner &will be handed over to contractor for erection & commission for works.
Thus as per definition of composite supply as per section 2(30)” though the supply of goods and services are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other as per agreement both are different supply made under different agreements. Hence it will not constitute composite supply. The supplier has to make to separate invoice for each of the agreement as per the terms & conditions mentioned there in.
(VI) Therefore, after going through the submission of the dealer, I am of the opinion that-
(1) The applicable GST rate for supply of equipment's for solar p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ement is customarily the way in which transactions of the nature as before us are effected. There are two sets of agreements which have been stated to be for –
1. Contract for supply of equipments
2. Contract for supply of services
Question no.1 has been framed in respect of these contracts. To answer the question, we look at each of the above agreements thus –
CONTRACT CONTENDED TO BE FOR SUPPLY OF EQUIPMENTS
The title of the agreement says “AGREEMENT FOR SUPPLY OF SOLAR POWER GENERATING SYSTEM”. A Solar Power Generating System (SPGS) is not available as a system as such. It consists of various components which are to be assembled, synchronized and, subject to the fulfillment of the attending requirements, to be tested so as to be made operative. Despite being so, we would look at the clauses of the agreement to understand the exact nature of the agreement.
* –
(A) The Buyer desires to set-up and operate solar photovoltaic plants with a total capacity of 60 MW (AC)/81 MW (

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

5 (five) years.
* “Applicable Permits” means all permits, clearances, authorizations, consents, licenses, lease, ruling, exemption, filing, agreements, or approvals, any valid waiver, variance, franchise, order of or from any Governmental Instrumentality, court or other body having jurisdiction over the subject matter in question, and in connection with the Scope of Supplies to be performed hereunder as may be effect form time to time and as listed in Schedule N herein;
* “Certificate of Commissioning” shall mean plant commissioning certificate issued from competent Government Authority for complete capacity.
* “Equipment, Spare Parts and Materials” shall mean the equipment and materials and Spare Parts to be delivered by the supplier under this Agreement and as specified in Schedule A and Schedule E;
* “Final Acceptance” means, the date of commencement of commercial operations of the Plant, provided that if at any point with respect to the supply items are pending as on the da

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

which shall in no event be later than ___________ or such other extended date as notified by the Buyer in writing for 60 MW (AC).
* “Scope of Supplies” shall have the meaning set forth in Clause 2.1.1 hereof;
* “Spare Parts” shall mean the spare parts listed in Schedule E;
* “Specification” shall mean the specifications prescribed by the Buyer for the Equipment, Spare Parts and Materials as more specifically set-out in Schedule J;
* shall have the meaning set forth in Clause 3.1 hereof;
* “Sub-vendors” shall have the meaning set forth in Clause 3.1 hereof;
* “Supply Commencement Date” shall have the meaning set forth in relevant Clause hereof;
* “Supply Schedule” means the schedule set forth in Schedule C hereto as such schedule may be adjusted from time to time in accordance with this Agreement;
* “Terms of Payment” means the terms set forth in Schedule B hereto for payments to be made by the Buyer to the supplier;
* “Variation” means any addition, deletion from, or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

part of the Plant, at the Plant Site (for onshore supplies)/destination port in India for off shore supply items (ICD, Airport, Seaport) as set out in detail in Schedule A and Schedule E as per the Specifications (the “Scope of supplies”) in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Equipment, Spare Parts and Materials shall be suitable and fit for its intended purpose as provided in this Agreement. All Equipments, Spare Parts and Materials supplied shall be new and without defects. Separate prices are specified for different equipments which are supplied under the agreement for commercial convenience. However, as a general trade practice all the equipments which are being are supplied under the agreement are supplied together for setting up a solar power generating system.
Further, the document in title of the equipment imported and supplied is directly transferred to the owner by way of High Seas Sale for commercial convenience and in order to avail benefit of concessional c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) If at any time, the Supplier becomes aware that it or suppliers or manufacturers of Spare Parts has discontinued the manufacture of certain Spare Parts, or is for any reason unable to manufacture or supply such Spare Parts, the supplier shall:
(i) immediately provide written notice of such facts to the Buyer and such notice shall be of sufficient detail to enable the Buyer to order a final batch of the relevant Spare Parts from the Supplier; and         
(ii) if requested by the Buyer to do so, deliver and obtain for the Buyer (at no expense to the Buyer), all drawings, patterns and other technical information relating to the Spare Parts.
(c) The Supplier warrants that all Spare Parts supplied under this agreement will be free from defects or deficiencies.
2.2 Commencement of Supplier's Performance
The Supplier shall commence performance of the Supplier's obligations hereunder on the date that the Buyer specifies (the “Supply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tly on shore supplies as detailed in Schedule A. The Supplier shall be obligated to adhere to the supply Schedule thereby agreed and any variation there from shall require the prior written consent of the Buyer. Provided that the Buyer may vary the Supply Schedule on account of occurrence of a Force Majeure Event or with prior written notice of 30 (thirty) days to the Supplier. In the event of such variation of such Supply Schedule by the Buyer, the Buyer shall be liable for and shall compensate the Supplier for additional costs agreed in writing by the Buyer on account of such change.
2.4.3 Inspection Not A Release
Neither the inspection at the port of entry in India or following delivery at the Plant Site, no matter whether the Buyer's personnel have been present, shall release the Supplier from any of the obligations or Warranties stipulated in this Agreement.
3. SUB-VENDORS
3.1 Subvendors and Equipment Suppliers
3.1.1 All consultants and Sub-vendors providing Equipment,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ions under this Agreement. The Supplier shall be liable to the Buyer for the acts and omissions of Subvendors and those of employees and agents of the Subvendor as if they were acts and omissions of the Supplier.
4.1 Contract Price
As full consideration to the Supplier for the complete solar power system and parts thereof to be provided hereunder including Spare Parts and for performance of all its obligations under the Agreement in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, the Buyer shall pay, and the Supplier shall accept, the contract price as specified in Schedule B as such sum may be adjusted in accordance with the terms of this Agreement (the “Contract Price”). The Contract Price shall be deemed to be inclusive of all Taxes including GST and duties payable under Applicable Laws with respect to the obligations to be performed by the Supplier under this Agreement.
4.2 Terms of Payment
…………………………………………….
In the event that the Supplier has

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

deemed to be agents, representatives, employees or servants of the Buyer in the performance of the Supplier's obligations hereunder, or any part thereof, or in any manner dealt with herein. Similarly, neither the Buyer nor its Sub-vendors nor the employees of either shall be deemed to be agents, representatives, employees or servants of the Supplier in the performance of the Buyer's obligations hereunder, or any part thereof, or in any manner dealt with herein. The Buyer shall not have the right to control or any actual, potential or other control over the methods and means by which Supplier or any of its agents, representatives, the Sub-vendors or employees conducts its independent business operations. The Parties covenant and agree that in the performance hereunder, they shall not perform any act or make any representation to any person to the effect that it is or any of its agents, representatives or Sub-vendors, is the agent of the other Party.
19.14 Title to the Equipmen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ope of Supplies covered under this Agreement is described herein below. The scope for providing the solar project generating system shall include design, engineer, manufacture, inspection; shop testing, packing and shipment of Equipments, Spare parts and Materials forming part of solar power generating system. These are integral parts of the solar power generating system being provided and would not be used separately.
1.2. In respect of equipment and systems listed below, all items required to make the equipment and/or system complete in all respects are deemed to be included whether or not these items are specifically mentioned in the Agreement.
1.3. The Supplier shall provide the erection procedures/manuals for the equipment being supplied. The “preliminary” erection procedure / manuals document shall be submitted within 15 (fifteen) days of signing this agreement.
2. MAJOR EQUIPMENT, SPARE PARTS AND MATERIALS LIST.
The list of equipment and material to be supplied under the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

icable)
* Power Transformers
* Complete Switchyard, Bay extension and remote end works as applicable.
* Inverter Transformers
* Auxiliary Transformers
* 110 kV Transmission line as per connectivity approval
* SCB, PV Connectors
* HT & LT Switchgears, HT & LT power and control Cables (AC as well as DC and communication cables)
* Illumination and ventilation system
* Supply required for AC BoS and DC BoS
* Earthing system (maintenance free)
* Scada system along with SLDC telemetry arrangements.
* Lightening Protection through ESE.
* Battery and battery charger.
* Module cleaning system
* Site enabling facilities including porta cabin, security cabin etc.
* Supply items required if any for civil works for the entire plant.
* Mandatory Spares for all electrical items as per list to be agreed later.
The list of Spare Parts to be supplied under the terms of the Agreement shall be as detailed in Schedule E hereto and shall be deemed to form a part of the Sc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ortionately on Submission and approval of LI Schedule & BBU
2
On receipt of material at site
70%
Proportionately on dispatch of material at site as per agreed BBU against MDCC
3
on successful Plant Completion
5%
on successful Plant Completion
 
SCHEDULE- J
SPECIFICATIONS
Specifications/ Design Basis for various equipments shall be mutually agreed between Supplier and Buyer during the early engineering period. However, Supplier agrees and confirms that all equipment shall be as per latest engineering/industry practice and shall conform to relevant IEC/IS.
SCHEDULE -N
LIST OF APPLICABLE PERMITS
The parties having the primary responsibility to obtain permits / approvals from appropriate authorities are listed below.
Part A: Buyer Permits
1. Import Export Certificate (IEC)
2. KPTCL approval for power evacuation
3. GST Registration
Part B: permits to be obtained by the Supplier
1. Local transportation approvals
2. Permission for movement of capital goods

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er, we see that there is Schedule J which says that Specifications/Design Basis for various equipments shall be mutually agreed between Supplier and Buyer during the early engineering period. Thus, the Supplier's involvement in the project is from the engineering and Design stage and not merely for supplying the equipments.
4. We find the definition of “Other Contractors” which is defined to mean other contractors engaged by the Supplier to implement, operate and maintain the Plant. This clause shows that the Supplier would implement, operate and maintain the Plant. 'Plant' is defined as “Plant/s” shall have 60 MW (AC) Solar PV Power Project at ____, Karnataka. Thus, the agreement does not stop at supply of equipments but extends to implementation, operation and maintenance, as well. When the Supplier is to implement, operate and maintain the Plant, on what basis could such a contract be termed as a contract merely for 'supply of goods'.
5. There is a clause whi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ract was for supply of 'goods' only.
We are convinced that the impugned contract is for supply of a solar power generating system, as a whole, and in addition, further responsibility in respect of execution and implementation of the Project/Plant is also proposed to be undertaken by the Supplier as per terms and conditions of the contract submitted before us. Having certain clauses in the agreement that the Supplier would supply only the equipments or goods would not change the nature of the contract. We need not even go beyond the agreement to look at the actual intention. We say so as clauses in the very agreement present a situation contrary to the claim being laid forth. As is commanded by the Hon. Courts, an agreement has to be read as a whole. Herein we could refer to the decision of the Hon. Bombay High Court in National Organic Chemicals Industries Ltd, v. State of Maharashtra, 2012 SCC OnLine Bom 2128: (2012) 54 VST 271 =  2012 (8) TMI 407 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT &n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on line fittings, cleaning/clearing of ROW, hauling and stringing of pipes, trenching (minimum depth will be 0.9 mtr. From the top of the pipe to ground surface), welding, laying testing of pipeline as per specifications, road crossings and restoration of the surface of the road to its original condition, Nullah crossing, river crossing etc., Supply and installation of marker posts, constructions of valves chambers including supply of all materials, constructions of PRS including supply of brick, cement, M.S. rod, MS. door, safety valve, control valves, AUDCO valves, M.S. piping and other small items, testing of lines at 6 kg/sq.cm. and commissioning of the whole system as per specifications. All equipments involved for execution including testing and commissioning of the above job shall have to be supplied by the contractor and the company will be liable for clearance of R.O. Supply of all on line non-HDPE materials, MS line from trunk line Tee point to PRS station with a value, flan

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

set out in clause 3 “scope of work” ultimately to see that the HDPE pipes are laid for transportation of natural gas. In our view, the acts to be committed by the applicants could not be divided into two parts, namely, supply of pipes and laying down the pipes. The payment terms set out in the clause 9 clearly indicates that the applicants were entitled to get money from Assam Gas depending upon the performance of various acts required to be done for the successful fulfilment of terms of the contract. The applicants were entitled to have mobilization of advance to the extent of 10 per cent of the contract value on furnishing of bank guarantee from a nationalized bank for equal amount with the work order. Clause 9 refers to the term “contract value” and in our view use of this term contract value clearly indicates that the consideration payable to the applicants was to be calculated as a whole and not in parts as suggested by the respondents. If at all the contract was intended to be d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct.
27. We have considered the argument advanced by learned advocates on both sides with reference to the contents of annexure I. By said annexure l, parties had arrived at an understanding as to at what rate the job done by the applicants would be charged. The arguments advanced by learned advocate Mr. Sonpal that the cost of the pipe was separately shown cannot be accepted to hold that the pipes were merely sold to Assam Gas. If that would have been the understanding between the parties, the terms of the annexure I would have been different inasmuch as the installation rate rupees per meter would not have been quoted to form a part of the total amount payable in respect of a particular description of a pipe. Annexure I also indicates the expected quantity of pipes which would be required for the purposes of laying down the pipeline as per the terms of the agreement. The amount of money payable was dependant upon total quantity of pipes which would be used to create the pipeline. Sa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

accepted. The said invoice at page 47, specifically mentions that the articles mentioned in the invoice are for home consumption. This would mean that the said articles were not to be sold in the market but the said articles were to be used in performance of an obligation cast upon the applicants to comply with the said agreement. The fact that the said invoice was raised in the name of Assam Gas clearly indicates that pipes mentioned in the said invoice were to be used in performing the contract. It is pertinent to note that the applicants have specifically passed an endorsement” no tax being works contract”. In our view, this endorsement would support the stand of the applicants that the invoices were not raised to show that goods covered by the invoices were sold to Assam Gas. The said invoices appear to have been raised to show that that the particular quantity of pipes will be used while performing the works contract with Assam Gas. The applicants have raised commercial invoices a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ver, the intended purpose to present the agreement as a contract for supply of goods ONLY has not achieved the desired purpose. The agreement is for supply of an effectively running solar power plant. The agreement clauses reveal that the Supplier is involved in the process right from the early engineering period to procurement and implementation stage. We have seen that the payment for this agreement is also linked to the successful Plant completion. If the agreement was for supply of materials ONLY, there should have arisen no occasion to link the payment to the completion of the Project. What more do we need to prove that the impugned agreement contended to be for supply of goods is actually a works contract involving engineering, design, procurement and commissioning of the solar power plant.
Having satisfied ourselves that the impugned agreement is actually a works contract agreement, we look at the definition of 'works contract' under the provisions of the GST Act,
&#3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

repair or commissioning of any movable or immovable property. Thus, activities in relation to movable and immovable property were covered earlier whereas the GST regime requires it to be restricted to immovable property only. In contracts of such a nature, the liability of the contractor doesn't end with the procuring of materials but it extends till the successful testing and commissioning of the system. The transaction is a 'works contract' but it is for us to decide whether it is a 'works contract' in terms of the GST Act. The term 'immovable property' has not been defined under the GST Act. However, there are a plethora of judgements of the Hon. Supreme court and the Hon. High Courts which have helped understand the term 'immovable property'. One such decision is T.T.G. Industries Ltd. v. CCE, (2004) 4 SCC 751 = 2004 (5) TMI 77 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA . We shall first look at the facts of the case.
“2.       The facts o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ved, the manner in which the equipments were assembled and erected as also their specifications in terms of volume and weight. It was explained that the function of the drilling machine is to drill hole in the blast furnace to enable the molten steel to flow out of the blast furnace for collection in ladles for further processing. After the molten material is taken out of the blast furnace, the hole in the wall of the furnace has to be closed by spraying special clay. This function is performed by the mudgun which is brought to its position and locked against the wall for exerting a force of 240-300 tons to fill up the hole in the furnace. The blast furnace in which the inputs are loaded is a massive vessel of 1719-cubic-metre capacity and the size of its outer diameter is 10.6 metres, and the height 31.25 metres. Hot air at 1200 degrees centigrade is fed into the blast furnace at various levels to melt the raw materials. With a view to protect the shell against heat, the blast furnace

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ete platform. This is achieved by getting up a trolley way with high beams in an inclined posture so that base plate could be moved to the concrete platform and secured. The same trolley helps in the movement of various components to their determined position. The various components of the mudgun and drilling machine are mounted piece by piece on a metal frame, which is welded to the base plate. The components are stored in a storehouse away from the blast furnace and are brought to site and physically lifted by a crane and landed on the cast house floor 25-feet high near the concrete platform where drilling machine and mudgun have to be erected. The weight of the mudgun is approximately 19 tons and the weight of the drilling machine approximately 11 tons. The volume of the mudgun is 1.5 x 4.5 x 1 metre and that of the drilling machine 1 x 6.5 x 1 metre. Having regard to the volume and weight of these machines is nothing like assembling them at ground level and then lifting them to a h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sembled condition due to their volume and weight. She considered the authorities on the subject and came to the conclusion that erection of mudgun and tap hole-drilling machine results in erection of immovable property. She noticed the judgment of this Court in Name Tulaman Manufacturers (P) Ltd. [(1989) 1 SCC172: 1989 SCC(Tax) 64: (1988) 38 ELT 566: 1988 Supp (5) SCR 1 =  1988 (9) TMI 51 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ] and also noticed the judgment of the Tribunal in Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co. Ltd. v. CCE [(1993) 65 ELT 121 (cegat) = 1992 (10) TMI 188 – CEGAT, NEW DELHI ] which held that the issue of immovable property was never raised before the Manufacturers (P) Ltd. [(1989) 1 SCC 172 : 1989 SCC (Tax) 64 : (1988) 38 ELT 566 : 1988 Supp (3) SCR 1 = 1988 (9) TMI 51 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] she found support for her conclusion in the decision of this Court in Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd.[1991 supp. (2) SCC 18 = 1990 (11) TMI 407 – SUPREME COURT

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nd tap hole-drilling machines do not admit of the definition of goods and, therefore, excise duty is not leviable thereon.”
18. The core question that still survives for consideration is whether the processes undertaken by the appellant at Bhilai for the erection of mudguns and drilling machines resulted in the emergence of goods leviable to excise duty or whether it resulted in erection of immovable property and not “goods”.
21. The appellant has placed considerable reliance on the principles enunciated and the test laid down by this Court in Muncipal corpn. of Greater Bombay [1991supp (2) SCC 18 = 1990 (11) TMI 407 – SUPREME COURT ] to determine what is immovable property. In that case the facts were that the respondent had taken on lease land over which it had put up, apart from other structures and buildings, six oil tanks for storage of petrol and petroleum products. Each tank rested on a foundation of sand having a height of 2 feet 6 inches. with four inches thick asphalt layer

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

place to place. Permanency is the test. The chattel whether is movable to another place of use in the same position or liable to be dismantled and re-erected at the latter place? If the answer is yes to the former it must be a movable Property and thereby it must be held that it is not attached to the earth. If the answer is yes to the latter it is attached to the earth.”
22. Applying the permanency test laid down in the aforesaid decision, counsel for the appellant contended that having regard to the facts of this case which are not in dispute, it must be held that what emerged as a result of the processes undertaken by the appellant was an immovable property. It cannot be moved from the place where it is erected as it is, and if it becomes necessary to move it,  it has first to be dismantled and then re-erected at another place. This factual position was also accepted by the adjudicating authority.
23. The technical member, however, held that the aforesaid decision was of no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sition further.
24. In Quality Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. v. CCE [(1995) 2 SCC 372 : (1995) 75 ELT 17 = 1994 (12) TMI 75 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ] the facts were that a tube mill and welding head were erected and installed by the appellant, a manufacturer of steel pipes and tubes, by purchasing certain items of plant and machinery in market and embedding them to earth and installing them to form a part of the tube mill and purchasing certain components from the market and assembling and installing them on the site to form part of the tube mill which was also covered in the process of welding facility. After noticing several decisions of this Court, the Court observed that the twin tests of exigibility of an article to duty under the Excise Act are that it must be a goods mentioned either in the Schedule or under Item 68 and must be marketable. The word “goods ” applied to those which can be brought to market for being bought and sold and therefore, it implied that it applied to such goods

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

duty of mono vertical crystallisers which are used in sugar factories to exhaust molasses of sugar. The material on record described the functions and manufacturing process. A mono vertical crystalliser is fixed on a solid RCC slab having a load-bearing capacity of about 30 tons per square metre. It is assembled at site in different sections and consists of bottom plates, tanks, coils, drive, frames, supports, plates, etc. The aforesaid parts were cleared from the premises of the appellants and the mono vertical, crystalliser was assembled and erected at site. The process involved welding and gas-cutting. The mono vertical crystalliser is a tall structure, rather like a tower with a platform at its summit. This Court noticed that marketability was a decisive test for dutiability. It meant that the goods were saleable or suitable for sale, that is to say, they should be capable of being sold to consumers in the market, as it is, without anything more. The Court then referred to the dec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

garding excisability of turbo alternator. In the facts of that case, it was held that installation or erection of turbo alternator on a concrete base specially constructed on the land cannot be treated as a common base and. therefore, it follows that installation or erection of turbo alternator on the platform constructed on the land would be immovable property, as such it cannot be an excisable goods falling within the meaning of Heading 85.02. In reaching this conclusion this Court considered the earlier judgments of this Court in Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay [1991 Supp (2) SCC 18], Quality Steel Tubes [(1995) 2 SCC372: (1995) 75 ELT 17] and Mittal Engg. Works (P) Ltd. [(1997) I SCC 203: (1996) 88 ELT 622] as also the earlier judgment of this court in Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. v. CCE [(1998) 1 SCC 400: (1998) 97 ELT 3] . This Court observed: (SCC pp. 35-36, para 14)
“14. There can be no doubt that if an article is an immovable property, it cannot be termed as 'excisable good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the machinery assembled and erected by the appellant at its factory site was immovable property as something attached to the earth like a building or a tree.
27. Keeping in view the principles laid down in the judgments noticed above, and having regard to the facts of this case, we have no doubt in our mind that the mudguns and the drilling machines erected at site by the appellant on a specially made concrete platform at a level of 25 feet above the ground on a base plate secured to the concrete platform , brought into existence not excisable goods but immovable property which could not be shifted without first dismantling it and then re-erecting it at another site. We have earlier noticed the processes involved and the manner in which the equipments were assembled and erected. we have also noticed the volume of the machines concerned and their weight. Taking all these facts into consideration and having regard to the nature of structure erected for basing these machines, we are sa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e without their aid a blast furnace cannot operate. It is not necessary for us to express any opinion as to whether the mudguns and the drilling machines are really a component of the plant and machinery of the steel plant, but we are satisfied that having regard to the manner in which these machine are erected and installed upon concrete structures, they do not answer the description of “goods” within the meaning of the term in the excise Act.”
Thus, it can be seen that the Hon. Supreme Court while holding the machines as immovable property took into account facts such that the machines could not be shifted without first dismantling it and then re-erecting it at another site. It was also sought to distinguish as to how a concrete base meant just to prevent wobbling of the machine would not place the machine in the category of 'immovable property' as something attached to the earth.
We will also look at the decision of the Hon. Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the present appeals is a marketing company engaged in the manufacture of asphalt drum/hot mix plants at the sites provided by the purchasers of such plants. It is common ground that Solidmec advertises its products and undertakes contracts for supplying. erection, commissioning and after-sale services relating thereto. It is also admitted that all the five concerns referred to above are closely held by Shri Hasmukhbhai, his brothers and the members of their families.
5. An inspection of the factories of the respondents by a team of officers from the Central Excise, preventing Wing, Headquarters. Ahmedabad, led to the issue of a notice dated 30-11-1999 to the four manufacturing units as well as to Solidmec calling upon them to show cause why the amounts mentioned in the said notice be not recovered from them towards Central excise duty. The notice accused the four manufacturing units of having wrongly declared and classified parts and components being manufactured by them as complete

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to manufacture of such plants as a distinct product with a new name, quality, usage and character emerged out of the said process. Resultantly, the end product, namely, asphalt drum/hot mix plants became exigible to Central excise duty, which duty Solidmec had successfully avoided The notice also proposed to levy penalties upon all the five concerns under appropriate provisions of the Central Excise Act.”
The Hon. Court has very elaborately dealt with the issue as can be seen thus –
22. Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 does not spell out an exhaustive definition of the expression “immovable property”. It simply provides that unless there is something repugnant in the subject or context, “immovable property” under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 does not include standing timber, growing crops or grass. Section 3(26) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, similarly, does not provide as exhaustive definition of the said expression. It reads:
(26) 'immovable property&#3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the earth, as in the case of walls and buildings;
(c) attached to what is so imbedded for the permanent beneficial enjoyment of that to which it is attached. ”
25. It is evident from the above that the expression “attached to the earth ” has three distinct dimensions, viz. (a) rooted in the earth as in the case of trees and shrubs (b) imbedded in the earth as in the case of walls and buildings, or (c) attached to what is so imbedded for the permanent beneficial enjoyment of that to which it is attached. Attachment of the plant in question with the help of nuts and bolts to a foundation not more than 1= feet deep intended to provide stability to the working of the plant and prevent vibration/wobble free operation does not qualify for being described as attached to the earth under any one of the three clauses extracted above. That is because attachment of the plant to the foundation is not comparable or synonymous to trees and shrubs rooted in earth. It is also not synonymous to imbe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d plantatur solo, solo cedit. This maxim, however, has no application in India. Even so, the question whether a chattel is imbedded in the earth so as to become immovable property is decided on the same principles as those which determine what constitutes an annexation to the land in English law. The English law has evolved the twin tests of degree or mode of annexation and the object of annexation.
27. In Wake V. Halt (1883) 8 App Cas 195 Lord Blackburn speaking for the Court of Appeal observed:
“The degree and nature of annexation is an important element for consideration; for where a chattel is so annexed that it cannot be removed without great damage to the land, it affords a strong ground for thinking that it was intended to be annexed in perpetuity to the land.”
28. The English law attaches greater importance to the object of annexation which is determined by the circumstances of each case. One of the important considerations is founded on the interest in the land wherein the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ressed to be exclusive of the land beneath, creates an interest in immovable property, for it is permanently attached to the ground on which it is built.
30. The courts in this country have applied the test whether the annexation is with the object of permanent beneficial enjoyment of the land or building. Machinery for metal-shaping and electro-plating which was attached by bolts to special concrete bases and could not be easily removed, was not treated to be a part of structure or the soil beneath it, as the attachment was not for more beneficial enjoyment of either the soil or concrete. Attachment in order to qualify the expression attached to the earth must be for the beneficial attachment of that to which it is attached. Doors, windows and shutters of a house are attached to the house, which is imbedded in the earth. They are attached to the house which is imbedded in the earth for the beneficial enjoyment of the houses. They have no separate existence from the house. Articles at

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Supreme Court has reiterated the same principles as were seen in the earlier decision of T.T.G. Industries Ltd. v. CCE (cited supra). The Hon. Court observed that the expression “attached to the earth” has three distinct dimensions – (a) rooted in the earth as in the case of trees and shrubs (b) imbedded in the earth, as in the case of walls and buildings; (c) attached to what is imbedded for the permanent beneficial enjoyment of that to which it is attached. It has been categorically observed that the attachment of the plant to the foundation at which it rests does not fall in the third category [attached to what is imbedded for the permanent beneficial enjoyment of that to which it is attached], for the reason that an attachment to fall in the third category it must be for permanent beneficial enjoyment of that to which the plant is attached. The Hon. Court even went on to distinguish and record with approval earlier decisions issue of 'immovable property'. We may have a lo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ovable property is basically not sound. For example, a factory owner or a householder may purchase a water pump and fix it on a cement base for operational efficiency and also for security. That will not make the water pump an item of immovable property. Some of the components of the water pump may even be assembled on site. That too will not make any difference to the principle. The test is whether the paper-making machine can be sold in the market. The Tribunal has found as a fact that it can be sold. In view of that finding, we are unable to uphold the contention of the appellant that the machine must be treated as a part of the immovable property of the company. Just because a plant and machinery are fixed in the earth for better functioning, it does not automatically become an immovable property.”
38. Reliance was placed by Mr Bagaria upon the decision of this Court in Quality Steel Tubes (p) Ltd. v. CCE [(1995) 2 SCC 372: (1995) 75 ELT17] and Mittal Engg. Works (P) Ltd. v. CCE [

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

: (1995) 75 ELT 17] with the setting up of a hot mix plant as in this case. As observed by this Court in Triveni Engg. & Industries Ltd. case [(2000) 7 SCC 29 : (2000) 120 ELT 273], the facts and circumstances of each case shall have to be examined for determining not only the factum of fastening/attachment to the earth but also the intention behind the same.
40. In Mittal Engg. Works (P) Ltd. case [(1997) 1 SCC 203 : (1996) 88 ELT 622] this Court was examining whether the mono vertical crystallisers erected and attached by a foundation to the earth at the site of the sugar factory could be treated as goods within the meaning of the Central Excise Act, 1944. This Court on facts noted that mono vertical crystallisers are fixed on a solid RCC slab having a load bearing capacity of about 30 tonnes per square metre and are assembled at site with bottom plates, tanks, coils drive frames, supports, plates, distance places, cutters, cutter supports, tank ribs, distance plate angles, water ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oundations to the earth and, therefore, were not, in any event, marketable as they were. ”
This decision also, in our opinion, does not lend any support to the case of the assessee in these appeals as we are not dealing with the case of a machine like mono vertical crystallisers which is permanently embedded in the structure of a sugar factory as was the position in Mittal Engg. Works (P) Ltd. case [(1997) 1 SCC 203 : (1996) 88 ELT 622]. The plants with which we are dealing are entirely over ground and are not assimilated in any structure. They are simply fixed to the foundation with the help of nuts and bolts in order to provide stability from vibrations during the operation.
42. So also in T.T.G. Industries Ltd. v. CCE [(2004) 4SCC 751 : (2004) 167 ELT 501], the machinery was erected at the site, by the assessee on a specially made concrete platform at a level of 25 ft height. Considering the weight and volume of the machine and the processes involved in its erection and installati

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in a permanent structure, the movable character of the machine becomes extinct, The same cannot thereafter be treated as Movable so as to be dutiable under the Excise Act. But cases in which there is no assimilation of the machine with the structure permanently, would stand on a different footing.
44. In the instant case all that has been said by the assessee is that the machine is fixed by nuts and bolts to a foundation not because the intention was to permanently attach it to the earth but because a foundation was necessary to provide a wobble free operation to the machine. An attachment of this kind without the necessary intent of making the same permanent cannot, in our opinion, constitute permanent fixing, embedding or attachment in the sense that would make the machine a part and parcel of the earth permanently. In that view of the matter we see no difficulty in holding that the plants in question were not immovable property so as to be immune from the levy of excise duty. Our a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re as the towers being a new product with a distinct name, characteristics and use and is distinct from the components used in the manufacture as contended on behalf of the Revenue. The Division Bench after making the following observations in paragraphs 7 to 9 held that the towers being not moveable, saleable and marketable, they would not be subject to excise duty. Paragraphs 7 to 9 reads as under:-   
“7. It is, therefore, clear that the goods must be excisable or that the goods covered having the attributes of excisable goods as understood in Excise Law which includes marketability. The real question, therefore, that arises is whether, the Transmission Apparatus is goods and secondly if even so whether they are marketable. The Commissioner noting the various equipments held that the transmission apparatus meets the test of manufacture. The Commissioner further noted the various equipments installed at the BTS site room.
The following equipments/apparatus were foun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

equipments installed at site were individual machine was rejected. The Commissioner further held that with the assembly of various equipment installed what emerges is a commodity with a distinct name, identity, character and use: distinct from inputs and classifiable under chapter 8525 of Central Excise Tariff and the same is distinct and separate from the various equipments which have gone into manufacture of the above transmission apparatus. The argument that after installation of BTS of cell site it becomes immovable properly was rejected. The statement of Narayan in his statement dated 28/1/2004 was partly relied upon to hold it was not immovable property.
8. The Learned Tribunal re-examining the various aspects of what is described as determination of levy of duty of base station, noted that the appellant is engaged in providing Mobile Telecommunication Service (MTS) and is based on global system for mobile communication (GSM). The infrastructure for GSM is similar to other netw

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

S/BSC site are not marketable. It also held that the test of marketability would also not be satisfied for another reason being, that for the installation of every BTS/BSC, licence from WPC/SACFA a wing of Department of Telecommunications, Government of India has to be obtained which invariably is user specific and site specific, meaning thereby if one wishes to sell the site to another user, it is not permissible under law, as the 'approval granted by the aforesaid authority for the frequency allocation and the site is for the user only and the purchaser would have to reapply for the license for that site. It cannot be sold/purchased marketed unattended and be equated to marketable goods. BTS/BSC site, therefore, are neither marketable nor capable of being marketed. The learned Tribunal also held that the appellants are not manufacturers and they are engaged in providing cellular mobile services by virtue of a license granted by the Government of India under the provisions of sect

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rketability recorded by the Tribunal namely that BTS/BSC is not marketable as licence is required from the Department of Telecommunication, Government of India. The facts on record would indicate that the equipments erected are embedded in the earth or on a building. The Tribunal noted that revenue does not contest or dispute the fact that Whenever BTS/BSC site has to be relocated, all the equipments like BTS/BSC, Microwave Equipment, batteries, control panels, air conditioners, UPS, tower antennae are required to be dismantled into individual components, then they are to be moved from the existing site and reassembled at new site. This involves damages to certain parts like cable trays, etc. which tire embedded/fixed to the Civil structure as also the BTS microwave equipment itself. All the components of the new product cannot be shifted as an illustration the room housing the equipment. This act of dismantling from the permanent site would render such goods not marketable. Apart from

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

annot be dismantled without substantial damage to their components and thus, cannot be reassembled, as non excisable. The new product would not be considered as movable and, therefore, will not be an excisable good. Para 6 of the said circular will not apply to the facts of this case. In our opinion, therefore, though a new product comes into existence, yet as it is not movable, saleable and marketable, it would not be subject to excise duty. ''
The principles laid down in the judgments discussed above stand good under all statutes unless any specific definition is available under the statute. What we want to say is that these principles cannot be circumscribed to any particular statute. In the facts before us, we are convinced that the transaction of supply of the Solar Power Plant does result into transfer of an 'immovable property' for reasons that the solar power plant could not be shifted without first dismantling it and then re-erecting it at another site.
An

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

defined) for the Plant and the Contractor has agreed to provide same to the Owner in accordance with the terms and conditions herein specified.
(C) The Parties are entering into this Agreement to define their respective mutual rights and obligations and to lay down the terms and conditions of their understanding with respect to execution of the Work by the Contractor.
1.1 Definitions
* “Addenda” shall mean changes to the Work before the commencement of the Works;
* shall mean all plant, machinery, tools, vessels, material, vehicles including but not limited to solar photovoltaic modules and inverters necessary for the completion of the Work to be provided by the Owner;
* are all supplies, including consumables, used by the Contractor for performance of the Work of Plant;
* shall mean 60 MW (AC) Solar PV Power Project at Village – ___________ Karnataka;
* “Work Completion Deadline” shall have the meaning set forth in Schedule I of this Agreement;
* “Work Completion Certi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ordance with which the Contractor is required to complete the Work in Plant;
* shall mean every Person (other than employees of the Contractor) employed or engaged by the Contractor or any person directly or indirectly in privity with the Contractor (including every sub-subcontractor), in accordance with Clause 3.1, to perform any portion of the Work, whether the furnishing of labor, materials, equipment, services or otherwise;
* “Work/s” shall mean the entire engineering civil and construction work set out in Schedule III which is to be supervised and facilitated by the Contractor, including the supply of construction material required for construction work.
2. APPOINTMENT
The Owner hereby appoints and the Contractor hereby accepts its appointment to carry out and facilitate the Works for the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Owner shall give in writing Notice to Proceed for commencement of work.
3. SCOPE OF WORK
3.1 The Contractor agrees

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

executed by the Contractor with such Affiliate(s) or the Subcontractors, the terms whereof shall be in conjunction and not in contravention to any of the term(s) or provisions of this Agreement.
3.3 In addition to the Work, the Contractor agrees and undertakes that it shall execute and perform all such acts, deeds, works and services as may be conducive, incidental, necessary and requisite for performance of its obligations under this Agreement and for the successful completion and commissioning of Plant on or before the agreed Work Completion Deadline respectively. The equipments shall be arranged by Owner and handed over to the Contractor for performing work as per defined scope.
3.4 The Contractor agrees that it shall at all times execute the Work in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and with Good Industry Practice. The Work shall be performed such that the same shall be suitable and fit for its intended purpose as provided in this Agreement and shall comply with the pro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ctor for performing work as defined scope.
7.4 Prime subcontractors
Contractor shall retain the major construction Subcontractors (the “Prime Subcontractors”) for the Work and due performance of this Agreement. The Contractor, will select the Prime Subcontractors by an evaluation process that evaluates potential candidates based upon relevant criteria, including experience, reputation, and demonstrated success in relevant construction projects.
10. INSURANCE
The Contractor (by itself or through its sub-contractor) /Owner (to be mutually decided) shall effect and maintain all insurance covers as per best industry practices and as advised by Lender's insurance advisor at its own cost, such insurances for such maximum sums as may be required under the financing agreements, and the Applicable Laws and such insurances as may be necessary or prudent in accordance with good industry practice.
Further, all insurances need to be endorsed in favor of Lender / Security Trustee of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mercial operations and that it shall continue to be liable to rectify any Defect in the Plant and be liable and responsible for the Works done and Plant till the expiry of the Defects Liability Period. Upon identification of a Defect, the Contractor agrees and covenants that it shall undertake, at its own costs and expenses, all such acts as may be necessary and requisite to cause and ensure that the Owner is satisfied with the Work and that such Defect has been rectified.
21. DESIGN DOCUMENTS
21.1 Owner's Review
It is expressly understood and agreed that the Design Documents and other related design information and any other documentation or drawings reasonably requested by the Owner (other than any such documents or drawings pertaining exclusively to Contractor's machinery, equipment and other proprietary processes) and Results of any supporting design calculations, that are prepared in connection with the performance of obligations under this Agreement shall, upon thei

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

with the Equipment and Materials, including without limitation the as-built drawings/documents and all such information and documents listed in Annexure A to Schedule III hereto (collectively, the “Design Documents”).
21.4 Ownership
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained elsewhere or in this Agreement, the Contractor agrees that all Design Documents and other documents prepared by Contractor with respect to performance of its obligations under this Agreement (other than any documents/information pertaining exclusively to the Contractors proprietary processes) shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Owner subject to the Contractor having received payments for the Work performed and the designs contained in them shall not be reproduced or used by Contractor in connection with any other project. The Contractor agrees that all such documents, as well as any drawings, tracings, specifications, calculations, memoranda, data, notes and other materials that are supplie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ign, Engineering and studies, transportation, unloading, storage and site handling, installation and commissioning of all equipments and material , services as per scope, complete project management as well as supply and construction related to various other packages for complete PV plants within specified terminal points) including but not limited to the following:
* All documentation requirements, obtain necessary clearances and liaison with applicable customs/other authorities and/or destination port / authorities in India for clearance of Owner supplied off shore items like Solar modules, PV connectors, Y connectors, DC Cables. Solar Inverter. All payment towards taxes and obtaining of all clearances as may be required at the destination port to import the above mentioned Equipments shall be in scope of Contractor. However, Custom Duty shall be arranged by Owner
* Transportation of the above off shore Equipments, Spare Parts and Materials from Indian Port to the Plant Site and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

control Cables (AC as well as DC and communication cables).
18. Illumination and ventilation system
19. AC BOS and DC BOS
20. Earthing system (maintenance free)
21. Lightening Protection.
22. Battery and battery charger.
23. AC/DC trench work and cabling
24. Module cleaning arrangement as applicable
25. Any other items required for the completion of the agreed scope
Handing over of entirely completed 60 MW-AC solar power project as per agreed scope
Arranging the land for the complete project, free from all encumbrances shall be the scope of Owner
All the major equipments / materials / items shall be procured by Owner and will be handed over to Contractor for erection and commissioning works. However, all the construction material shall be in scope of Contractor
TERMINAL POINT: Remote end substation of Karnataka Power Transmission Company Limited (KPTCL) 110kV Switchyard
DESIGN BASIS FOR 60 MW AC SOLAR PV POWER PLANT
Contractor shall submit the design basis meeting the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing and intersecting electric lines and poles, telephone lines and poles, highways, bridges, waterways, railroads, sewer lines, natural gas pipelines, drainage ditches, culverts, fences, walls, and any and all physical property of others from damage as a result of its performance of the Works. In the event that any such physical property is damaged or destroyed in the course of the performance of the Works due to reasons attributable to Contractor or any Subcontractor, Contractor shall rebuild, restore or replace such damaged or destroyed physical property.
ANNEXURE A
LIST OF DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED BY CONTRACTOR FOR THE OWNER'S APPROVAL
1 Site Map showing the following areas : Solar Equipment, Switchyard, Site Office and Access
2 Solar Plant Layout showing module and string layout, Inverters, major Cables, switchyard equipment evacuation point and transmission line
3 Earthing layout
4 ELECTRICAL DIAGRAMS, DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS
1. Single line diagram
2.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n, and other terms and conditions.
d. Solar Radiation and other weather data measurement methodology, automation, calibration procedures
e. Equipment DIAGRAMS AND DRAWINGS
SCHEDULE IV: PAYMENT OF CONSIDERATION
Contract Price
Item No
Description
Contract Price
1
Engineering, Procurement, Construction and associated works for 60-MW AC Solar PV Project including all tax and GST
 
 
Total contract price
 
 
SCHEDULE XI: ACCEPTANCE TESTS
Prior to commissioning the Plant, tests shall be conducted on the AC side to ensure trouble-free operation of all components, including but not limited to. Modules, Inverters, transformers, switchyard, switchgear, relays, sensors and monitoring systems. All equipment shall comply with all applicable IEC and IS standards and acceptance reports should be submitted in standard formats. All tests shall be conducted in mutual conjunction with the supplier, Contractor and the Owner as per relevant IEC and IS specifications

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

etting up of a solar power plant results into immovable property. In view thereof, we are of the view that this agreement, too, is a “works contract” in terms of clause (119) of section 2 of the GST Act.
In fact, we have to categorically observe that the applicant has tried to bifurcate the works contract of setting up of a solar power plant into contract for supply of goods and supply of services. We see that both the agreements tendered are for setting up of a Plant, a 60 MW (AC) Solar PV Power Project in Karnataka. Thus, it is for the contract of setting up of the same Power Plant. However, for some obvious reasons, sometimes, the contract of setting up of a Power Plant is executed by devising two agreements in terms of supply of goods and supply of services.
However, we have seen earlier that this arrangement fails. In the first agreement purported to be for 'supply of goods', there were clauses such as – other contractors engaged by the Supplier to implement, operate a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

etting up of a solar power generation plant is a “works contract” in terms of clause (119) of section 2 of the GST Act. In view thereof, we would not enter into any discussion as to the transactions involving a 'composite supply'. Since the transaction is treated as a “works contract” and not as a “composite supply”, there would be no relevance of “principal supply”
All the submission of the applicant was on the point that where there are two separate contracts – one for supply of goods to be used in solar power plant and one for services, both would be taxed separately. However, we have seen above that such are not the facts of the instant case. The interpretation and ascertainment of tax implications is to be had in respect of the facts and the documents. There cannot be any straight jacket formula in respect of agreements where there is any ambiguity or an artificial bifurcation. We reiterate that it is only the actual facts and agreements that would determine the nature o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of this question, the applicant has tendered the two agreements which have been discussed above. Through various clauses in the agreement, we have seen that the first agreement as claimed to be for supply of goods was in fact a “works contract” in terms of clause (119) of section 2 of the GST Act. As regards the second agreement claimed to be for supply of services, we have seen that the same involved supply of goods and services, as well and has been inferred by us to be a “works contract” in terms of clause (119) of section 2 of the GST Act.
Having seen so, we observe that depending upon the nature of supply, intra-State or inter-State, the rate of tax would be governed by the entry no.3(ii) of the Notification No.8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act) or the Notification no. 11/2017 – Central Tax / State Tax (Rate) under the CGST Act and MGST Acts, as reproduced below. The rate of tax would be 18% under the IGST Act and 9% each

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct, 2017 (IGST Act) which states thus –
234
84 Or 85 Or 94
Following renewable energy devices and parts for their manufacture
* Bio-gas plant
* Solar power based devices
* Solar power generating system
* Wind mills and wind operated electricity generator (WOEG)
* Waste to energy plants/devices
* Solar lantern/solar lamp
* Ocean waves/tidal waves energy devices/plants
* Photo voltaic cells, whether or not assembled in modules or made up into panels
 
As can be the seen, the above entry is under the notification prescribing the tax rate on 'goods'. We have to observe that the facts of the transactions have to be seen in terms of what the sub-contracting agreement says, what has been supplied, whether the item supplied is a part. Such and many other questions have to be answered. No details have been brought before us. If the transaction is a supply of “goods” then the applicable Schedules (exempt or taxable) would have to be seen. In the absence of any d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the questions are answered thus –
Q.1 Whether in case of separate contracts for supply of goods and services for a solar power plant, there would be separate taxability of goods as 'solar power generating system' at 5% and services at 18% ?
A.1 The agreements tendered in support of this question reveal that the impugned transaction of setting up and operation of a solar photovoltaic plant is in the nature of a “works contract” in terms of clause (119) of section 2 of the GST Act. Schedule II [Activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services] treats “works contracts” u/s 2(119) as supply of 'services'. Depending upon the nature of supply, intra-State or inter-State, the rate of tax would be governed by the entry no.3(ii) of the Notification No.8/2017-lntegrated Tax (Rate) under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act) or the Notification no.11/2017 -Central Tax/State Tax (Rate) under the CGST Act and MGST Acts. The rate of tax would

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exemption / applicable rates

Exemption / applicable rates
Query (Issue) Started By: – SHRIDHAR MOHOLKAR Dated:- 2-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 5-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
An PSU engaged in creating infrastructure works, is in the process of engaging an agency on contract basis for supply of Skilled / unskilled staff. Is this activity exempted from GST, if yes which clause and if not what is the rate of GST. Also please confirm whether Service receiver will pay the tax by deducting it fro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai South Versus M/s. Sutherland Global Services Pvt Ltd.

Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai South Versus M/s. Sutherland Global Services Pvt Ltd.
Service Tax
2018 (6) TMI 658 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 2-3-2018
Appeal No. ST/593/2010 – 40562/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR) for the Appellant
Shri Joseph Prabhakar, Advocate for the Respondent
Per Bench
The respondents are subsidiary company of M/s. Sutherland Global Services Inc. USA dealing with customer management service. They offer IT enabled service, technical help service, call centre service on behalf of clients viz. Microsoft, HP etc, whose customers are located outside I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

/- thereby disallowing credit to the tune of Rs. 11,85,544/- in respect of credit availed group medical insurance premium and insurance paid by the respondent. Aggrieved by allowing the credit, department has filed the present appeal.
2. On behalf of the Department, ld. AR Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy reiterated the grounds of appeal.
3. The ld. counsel Shri Joseph Prabhakar appeared for the respondent and argued the matter. He submitted that the Commissioner has allowed the credit in respect of various services which have been used by the respondent for providing output services. The period involved is prior to 1.4.2011 when the definition of input services had a very wide ambit as it included the words “activities relating to business”. Th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC Reversal as per Rule 42

ITC Reversal as per Rule 42
Query (Issue) Started By: – LAKSHMINARAYANAN TR Dated:- 1-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 3-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
If more than one business vertical are under same GSTIN itself, while applying Rule 42 for ITC Reversal- Total Turnover of entire GSTIN to be taken or same can be split into segment wise also ?
For ex:- Say, under one GSTIN there exists three Business Vertical – Hotel, Courier & Plastic. Hotel vertical has taxable and exempt supplies to calculate ITC Reversal for common input credit can we use the following
Common ITC (of Hotel Vertical) * Exempted Supply in Hotel Vertical

Total Supply of Hotel Vertical
Or We have to consider the Total supply of all vertica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on ₹ 10000/- which formula is correct ?
10000 * 3L/10L = ₹ 3000/- + 500 (5% of 10000) OR
10000*13L/30L = ₹ 4333/- + 500
Experts advice please.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
turnover of plastic, hotel and courier division put together is ₹ 30 lacs.
total common input tax credit is ₹ 10 thoudand.
formula
10,000 x 10 lacs ÷ 30 lacs = ₹ 3,333/- ( it means out of common credit of ₹ 10 thousand , ₹ 3,333/- is attributable to each division say, plastic, hotel and courier
₹ 3,333/- of plastic division is ineligible credit.
₹ 3,333/- of courier division is fully creditable .
₹ 3,333/- of hotel division need further birfucate into tax attributable to taxabl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pure service

Pure service
Query (Issue) Started By: – Pallav Thakkar Dated:- 1-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 5-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
What is the meaning of pure service given by central,stat Government or by local authority?
Is there any difference between Pure service and pure labour contract?
Reply By Praveen Nair:
The Reply:
Hi Pallav
Supply of services without involving any supply of goods would be treated as supply of 'pure services'.
For example, supply of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Two arrested for alleged GST fraud

Two arrested for alleged GST fraud
GST
Dated:- 1-3-2018

Mumbai, Feb 28 (PTI) Directors of two companies were today arrested by the Goods and Services Tax authorities here for alleged tax evasion to the tune of over ₹ 7 crore, in what could be the first arrests under the new indirect taxation regime.
CGST Mumbai Central Commissionerate arrested Sanjiv Pravin Mehta, director of Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt Ltd, and Vinaykumar D Arya, director of V N Industries, for availing of &quo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Can we convert Taxpaye type from Regular to SEZ?

Can we convert Taxpaye type from Regular to SEZ?
Query (Issue) Started By: – LAKSHMINARAYANAN TR Dated:- 1-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 2-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
Good day! Can someone help with my question, is there a way to convert taxpayer type as SEZ? When I search for the GSTIN, it shows as Regular taxpayer on the GSTN portal, should that show as SEZ? In part B of registration form, we have mentioned nature of business activity as SEZ, would that not good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Struggle for Refund of IGST paid for the goods exported out of India

Struggle for Refund of IGST paid for the goods exported out of India
By: – Alkesh Jani
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 1-3-2018

Struggle for Refund of IGST paid for the goods exported out of India.
The exporter plays a vital role in the country's economy. The Government encourages exporters by various schemes and incentives. The GST regime has also made an efforts in this direction by granting refund of IGST paid on goods and /or services exported out of India. After passing of 8 months, it is not wise to compare or discuss the erstwhile rules and procedures. Here we shall discuss the issues pertaining to refunds pertaining to goods exported out of India.
2. The refund of tax paid for the goods exported out of India is governed by Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017 and Rule 96 of CGST Rules, 2017. Moreover, Circular No.17/17/2017-GST dated 15th November, 2017, was issued. The para 2.2 deals with the refund of IGST paid on goods exported out of India the same is reprodu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ortal.”
From above, it is clear that after furnishing of valid return in form GSTR-3 or GSTR-3B the refund is to be sanctioned. The most surprising is, although GST being online, if there is any error or mistake in shipping bill or GSTR-3B, no communication is made to exporter and the exporter runs here and there for refund even after the expiry of sixty days as stipulated under the law. There are refunds pending for the month of July, 2017, the exporter came to know about the errors or mistakes only after visiting the Customs port. Now, the errors and/or mistakes done by exporter, being new to GST regime such as issuance of commercial Invoice, IGST paid in GSTR-3(1)(a) or (c) instead of (b), they are being penalized for this error/mistakes by non sanctioning of refund.
The most interesting and eye catching scenario is, the Circular No. 42/2017-Cus dated 17th November, 2017, Circular No.05/2018-Cus dated 23rd Feb., 2018 and some advisory videos were made available on the portal, they

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r rate of Drawback has been claimed for that SB, thus making the SB ineligible for IGST refund”.
For the above, Para 3 (d) of the Circular No. 05/2018-Cus dated 23rd Feb., 2018 states that ” Once all the invoices pertaining to Shipping Bill are verified by the officer, the system shall calculate the scroll amount against a shipping bill, after subtracting the drawback amount for each invoice where applicable, and display the refund amount to the officer for approval.” While till 15th of Feb., 2018 vide Letter F.No. 450/119/2017-Cus-IV of Director of Customs, enclosing FAQ and at Question No. 19 which states that if the Shipping is with no error is transmitted to Customs but still no refund is sanctioned and the answer to this is that, (iii) at the composite rate of drawback is claimed for that shipping bill during the transitional period between 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2017, thus making the shipping bill ineligible for refund of IGST paid. How far it is just that by granting of 2% of FOB

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n be said that the exporters are being penalized for exporting the goods out of India. The authority washes their hand vide Circular No. 5/2018-Cus that “However, ultimately it is the responsibility of the exporters to ensure careful and correct filing of returns for hassle free sanction of IGST refunds”
Concluding, it can be said that proper authority shall demonstrate by creating a dummy GSTIN that how to rectify the error and mistakes it in order to help the exporters and other tax payers also, to smoothen the GST regime.
The other experts are invited to en-light with their valuable views.
Reply By Avinash Gopalakrishnan as =
I have heard that receipt of refund of CGST and SGST is a two part affair , wherein one submits the relevant refund form to the GST ( Central excise dept )who upon passing the order for refund ,only refunds 50% ( CGST component) and then one has to go to the sales tax department to get the balance 50% paid as SGST , is this the process .. could anyone plea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IS LICENSE LEASING A PROPERTY

IS LICENSE LEASING A PROPERTY
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 1-3-2018

Liquor manufacture in India is very complicated with very few cases where brand owner, distiller and bottler are the same entity. Since license for distilleries are highly regulated by the State, brand owners get the liquor manufactured / bottled through on license lease basis which could be either by leasing of the distillery or factory (immovable property) itself or leasing of liquor license. Such liquor licensing is regulated by state excise laws and liquor manufacturing rules as made applicable to the State.
When we talk of renting or leasing services, we find that renting of immovable property is a taxable event and su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d, i.e. factory premises as well as license of potable liquor and rectified spirits, revenue department wanted that factory leasing and license leasing should not be delinked and sought to tax both as renting of immovable property service, the tribunal (Cestat, Mumbai) ruled in favour of the assessee and against the department.
The appellants were engaged in the business of manufacturing and bottling of alcoholic beverages. The appellants held Potable Liquor License (PLL) and Rectified Sprit License (RSII). The appellants entered into an agreement under which the appellants leased their licenses. The appellants thereafter entered into an agreement for bottling at their plant and recovered bottling charges for the same.
Revenue's argum

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

been put on the factory, which had been licensed and no charges in the license premises could be made by the licensor without the permission.
It was further held that though license is granted in respect of manufactory but the same is granted to the person. The license given to a person in respect of a manufactory can be transferred to another manufactory on another site in the name of same person. License can be granted even before the manufactory comes into existence. From the Rules it was apparent that license by itself is not a immovable property and therefore leasing of license could not be treated as renting of immovable property service.
It thus concluded that license by itself is not immovable property and therefore, leasing of li

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Transition of Customs functions hitherto performed by the Central Excise/ GST officers, including the export procedure and sealing of Containerized export cargo, to the Customs formations, under the Commissioner of Customs, Pune

Transition of Customs functions hitherto performed by the Central Excise/ GST officers, including the export procedure and sealing of Containerized export cargo, to the Customs formations, under the Commissioner of Customs, Pune
CORRIGENDUM TO TRADE NOTICE NO. 01/2018 Dated:- 1-3-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
GST BHAVAN, 41/A, SASSON ROAD, PUNE-411001
F. No. VIII/Cus/Tech/Gst-Reorg/ 48-16/2017
Pune Dated: – 01.03.2018
CORRIGENDUM TO TRADE NOTICE NO. 01/2018
Sub : Transition of Customs functions hitherto performed by the Central Excise/ GST officers, including the export procedure and sealing of Containerized export cargo, to the Customs formations, under the Commissioner of Customs, Pune.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =