Extension of due date of filing of GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018

Extension of due date of filing of GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018
09/2018–C.T./GST Dated:- 18-5-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
West Bengal SGST
West Bengal SGST
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
NOTIFICATION BY THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
Notification No. 09/2018-C.T./GST
Dated: 18.05.2018
Notification No. 23/2018 – State Tax
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the West Bengal Good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Daman and Diu – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 318(E), dated the 31st March, 2018

Daman and Diu – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 318(E), dated the 31st March, 2018
9/2018 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Union Territory GST (UTGST)
GST
UTGST
UTGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION No. 9/2018-Union Territory Tax
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
G.S.R. 465(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section 22 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Dadra and Nagar Haveli – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 317(E) dated the 31st March, 2018

Dadra and Nagar Haveli – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 317(E) dated the 31st March, 2018
8/2018 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Union Territory GST (UTGST)
GST
UTGST
UTGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION No. 8/2018-Union Territory Tax
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
G.S.R. 464(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section 22 of the Union Territory Goods and Services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Chandigarh – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government, rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 316(E) dated the 31st March, 2018

Chandigarh – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government, rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 316(E) dated the 31st March, 2018
7/2018 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Union Territory GST (UTGST)
GST
UTGST
UTGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION No. 7/2018-Union Territory Tax
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
G.S.R. 463(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section 22 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018
23/2018 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Central GST (CGST)
GST
CGST
CGST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Notification No. 23/2018 – Central Tax
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
G.S.R. 462 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rectification in GST3B

Rectification in GST3B
Query (Issue) Started By: – Amlan Mohanty Dated:- 17-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 22-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Sir,
I am a civil contractor.I work with Police Housing corporation. I receive bill almost in every month and 12 % GST for construction work is allocated for GST purpose and which is given ro me. I file my GST return every month till March 18 GSTR 3B has also been filed, but by mistakenly during filing i filed it B2C instead of B2B by putting the GSTIN NO OF POLICE HOUSING corporation . Now the corporation is telling me as i had filed in B2C so the GST AMMOUNT is not visible in their GST NO and they will not be able to get input tax credit for the GST I filed. For this re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Issue related to taxability. of 'tenancy rights' under GST.

Issue related to taxability. of 'tenancy rights' under GST.
12-28/2017-18-EXN-GST-(528)-15710-727 Dated:- 17-5-2018 Himachal Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Circular No. 12-28/2017-18-EXN-GST-(528)-15710-727
Government of Himachal Pradesh,
Excise and Taxation Department
To
1. The Additional Excise and Taxation Commissioner, South Zone. Shimla-9, H.P.
2. The Jt. Commissioner of State Taxes and Excise Central zone, North zone, Flying squad NZ/ SZ/ CZ.
3. The Director (Directorate Treasuries, Accounts and Lotteries) Block No-23 SDA Complex, Kasumpati, Shimla- 171009.
4. The Dy. Commissioner of State Taxes and Excise, Shimla, Solan, BBN Baddi, Sirimour, Bilaspur, Hamirpur, Mandi, Kullu, Chamba, Kangra, Revenue Distt Nurpur and Una,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of tenancy rights against tenancy premium which is also known as “pagadi system” the tenant acquires, tenancy rights in the property against payment of tenancy premium (Pagdi). The landlord be owner of the property but the possession of the same lies with the tenant. The tenant pays periodic rent to the landlord as long as he occupies the property. The tenant also usually has the option to sell the tenancy right of the said property and in such a case has to share a percentage of the proceed with owner of land. as laid down in their tenancy agreement. Alternatively, the landlord pays to tenant the prevailing tenancy premium to get the property vacated.
3. As per section 9(1) of the HPGST Act there shall be levied state tax on the intra-St

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is levied on such transfers of tenancy rights and such transaction thus should not be subjected to GST. is not relevant. Merely because a transaction or a supply involves execution of documents which may require registration and payment of registration fee and stamp duty would not preclude them from the scope of supply of goods and services and from payment of GST. The transfer of tenancy rights cannot be treated as sale of land or building declared as neither a supply of goods nor of services in para 5 of Schedule III to HPGST Act. 2017. Thus a consideration for the said activity shall attract levy of GST.
5. To sum up, the activity of transfer of 'tenancy rights' is squarely covered under the scope of supply and taxable per-se. Trans

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Swastik Township Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST, Kolkata North

M/s Swastik Township Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST, Kolkata North
Service Tax
2018 (8) TMI 485 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
S.T. Appeal No.75355/2018 – FO/76431/2018
Service Tax
SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER And SHRI BIJAY KUMAR, TECHNICAL MEMBER
Shri Saurabh Bhutra, Adv. for the Appellant (s)
Shri S. S. Chattopadhyay, Supdt. (A.R.) for the Revenue
ORDER
Per Shri Bijay Kumar :
The present appeal has been filed the Appellant against the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.219/ST-I/KOL/2017 dt.-26.09.2017 passed by Commissioner of CGST & Ex. (Appeals), Kolkata, vide which the ld.Commissioner (Appeals) has modified the order passed by the adjudicating authority to the extent that he set aside the demand of Rs. 46,814/- under Rule 14 and penalty under Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. He has also ordered the appellant to pay interest for intervening period under Section 75 of the Act and imposed penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 77

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules and for such wrong availment of Cenvat Credit, the appellants were made liable to penal action under Rule 15 thereof. It is alleged that the aforesaid liability arose on the appellant on account of not including the additional sale price of the flat sold by the appellant pertaining to (i) Association formation deposit, (ii) Common meter security deposit, (iii) Deposit for common maintenance for six months, (iv) Deposit for electricity charges for common areas of six months. The appellant-assessee discharged the service tax liability on the total sale price, but did not discharge the service tax liability on the amount received on account of different head as mentioned above. It was felt by the Department that the services provided under the aforesaid head is to be categorized under “Builders Special Service” and such deposit is to be added in the gross amount in the service tax. The Department relied upon the audited balance sheet.
3. The ld.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

zu) of the Act. He is of the view that the Revenue has proceeded against the baseless allegations because the amount collected by them from the residence of the flat owners, has been taken towards the services mentioned above and has been subsequently returned to them after making adjustment towards various fees. The ld.Advocate also submitted that the impugned order classifying the services under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) under Manpower Recruitment Services is not sustainable on the ground that the appellant has availed various services from vendors as plumbing services, pipe laying and fittings, tap box fitting etc. and the payment has been late against the plumbing bill. In providing of services discharging service tax on this service, the appellant is not in receipt of manpower recruitment services. The ld.Advocate also stated that the impugned demand is barred by limitation as the extended period of limitation is not invokable in this case. As there is no malafide intention,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lt of any conscious and deliberate wrong doing and in the order passed under Section 11A(2) there is a legally tenable finding to that effect then the provision of Section 11AC would also get attracted. The converse of this, equally true, is that in the absence of such an allegation in the notice the period for which the escaped duty may be reclaimed would be confined to one year and in the absence of such a finding in the order passed under Section 11A(2) there would be no application of the penalty provision in Section 11AC of the Act.”
He has also relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Saboo Coating Ltd. Vs. CCEx, Chandigarh : 2016 (36) STR 447 (Tri.- Del.), wherein the Tribunal has held as under :
“4. As regards limitation, I find that there is no dispute by the lower authorities that the credit was availed and duly reflected in the returns. If there is no column in the returns to show the nature of the input services, the assessee cannot be blamed for not provi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

classify under the Builders Special Services classifiable under Chapter Heading 65(105)(zzzu) of the Finance Act,1994. On going through the various documents enclosed in the appeal memorandum, as such, agreement of sale, bank statement, bills provided by the various vendors, we find that the appellant has returned excess amount to the flat owners after collection of various fees, as such, Association formation deposit, Common meter deposit, common maintenance deposit, common electricity charges etc. The same has been rendered after collection of actual amount spent for payment of this deposit/fees/base area on behalf of 120 flat owners.
7. In view of the above, we are of the view that this payments are only actual charges paid to the various statutory bodies and for electricity maintenance in common area and the same is therefore, not liable to service tax and if so, abatement is available to them under the Service Tax Law.
8. Further, we find that the adjudicating authority has pass

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rain Cements Limited Unit-II Versus CCT, Tirupathi GST

Rain Cements Limited Unit-II Versus CCT, Tirupathi GST
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 1407 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
Appeal No. E/31224/2017 – IO/27/2018
Central Excise
Mr. P.V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri Y. Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri Das Thavanam, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent.
[Order per: P.VENKATA SUBBA RAO]
1. Heard both sides and perused the records. This is a case of credit of the service tax paid on the food provided to the workers outsourced by the appellant. The definition of input service specifically excludes outdoor catering provided to the employees. The appellant argues that they have outsourced manpower to work in the factory

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rvice provider for the subsidised food although it is not evident from the records. In turn, the man power service provider bills the appellant for the food subsidy including the service tax thereon. The issue in dispute is the credit of the service tax element on this food subsidy. It is the case of the Revenue that this food subsidy amounts to outdoor catering services for employees and the credit of the service tax thereon is inadmissible in view of the specific exclusion in the Rules. The appellant argued that although it is called food subsidy, in fact, it is manpower outsourcing service and it is also a component of the charges paid to the manpower supplier. The department, on the other hand, argues that the bill is raised specificall

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

case of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. [2017(49) S.T.R 88 (Tri.-Hyd), Tribunal had specifically allowed credit of input service on outdoor catering services provided to the employees, considering this is a statutory requirement. Ld. DR points out that there have been conflicting orders regarding the availability of credit on outdoor catering service and hence in the case of Wipro Limited [2018(9)G.S.T.L. 285 (Tri.-Bang.)], the matter was referred to Hon'ble President for constituting Larger Bench to resolve the conflict between the decisions of different Benches. Hence, this case should also be referred to Larger Bench.
3. I have gone through the records of the case and I find one of the elements to be decided is whether or no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Western Refrigeration Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Thane Rural

Western Refrigeration Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Thane Rural
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 235 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
Appeal No. E/85245/2018 – Order No. A/86433/2018
Central Excise
Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member ( Judicial )
Shri Rajesh Ostwal, Advocate, for appellant
Shri M. R. Melvin, Superintendent (AR), for respondent
ORDER
The present appeal is filed by the appellant only for waiver of penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
2. The facts of the case are that the appellant has availed cenvat credit in respect of common input service. Apart from the sale of their manufactured goods, they are also doing the trading activity of boughtout items. The case of the department is that the appellant was supposed to reverse the cenvat credit under Rule (3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 attributed to the trading activity being an exempted service. The demand of cenvat credit was confirmed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he case of wrong availment of credit. As per Rule 6(3A), the appellant is required to pay the proportionate cenvat credit attributed to the exempted service along with interest @ 24%. Since this interest rate is very exorbitant, it is in the form of penalty. Therefore, the legislators very consciously did not make the provision for penalty in such cases. He submits that Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 meant for penalty was not invoked and also not invokable. Therefore, penalty under Section 11AC cannot be imposed. He placed reliance on the following judgments:-
(i) CCE vs. Sangrur Agro Ltd. – 2010 (254) ELT 25 (P&H);
(ii) Eastern Medikit Ltd. vs. CCE – 2009 (242) ELT 51 (Tri.-Del.);
(iii) Sandoz Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE – 2018 (4) TMI-CESTAT Mumbai;
(iv) Man Structural Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE&ST – 2015 (11) TMI 664-CESTAT New Delhi.
He further submits that the appellant has recorded the trading activity and availment of cenvat credit in their books. Therefore, the case was als

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oods or the provider of output service shall intimate in writing to the Superintendent of Central Excise giving the following particulars, namely :-
(i) name, address and registration number of the manufacturer of goods or provider of output service;
(ii) date from which the option under this clause is exercised or proposed to be exercised;
(iii) description of inputs and input services used exclusively in or in relation to the manufacture of exempted goods removed or for provision of exempted services and description of such exempted goods removed and such exempted services provided;
(iv) description of inputs and input services used exclusively in or in relation to the manufacture of non-exempted goods removed or for the provision of non-exempted services and description of such non-exempted goods removed and non-exempted services provided;
(v) CENVAT credit of inputs and input services lying in balance as on the date of exercising the option under this condition;
(

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mmon credit, denoted as C and calculated as,-
C = T – (A + B);
Explanation. – Where the entire credit has been attributed under sub-clauses (i) and (ii), namely ineligible credit or eligible credit, there shall be left no common credit for further attribution.
(iv) the amount of common credit attributable towards exempted goods removed or for provision of exempted services shall be called ineligible common credit, denoted as D and calculated as follows and shall be paid, –
D = (E/F) x C;
where E is the sum total of –
(a) value of exempted services provided; and
(b) value of exempted goods removed, during the preceding financial year; where F is the sum total of –
(a) value of non-exempted services provided,
(b) value of exempted services provided,
(c) value of non-exempted goods removed, and
(d) value of exempted goods removed, during the preceding financial year :
Provided that where no final products were manufactured or no output service was provi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(c) the manufacturer or the provider of output service shall determine the amount of CENVAT credit attributable to exempted goods removed and provision of exempted services for the whole of financial year, out of the total credit denoted as T (Annual) taken during the whole of financial year in the following manner, namely :-
(i) the CENVAT credit attributable to inputs and input services used exclusively in or in relation to the manufacture of exempted goods removed or for provision of exempted services on the basis of inputs and input services actually so used during the financial year, shall be called Annual ineligible credit and denoted as A(Annual);
(ii) the CENVAT credit attributable to inputs and input services used exclusively in or in relation to the manufacture of non-exempted goods removed or for the provision of non-exempted services on the basis of inputs and input services actually so used shall be called Annual eligible credit and denoted as B(Annual);
(iii) com

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ble common credit and the aggregate amount of ineligible credit and ineligible common credit for the period of whole year, namely, [{A(Annual) + D(Annual)} – {(A+D) aggregated for the whole year)}], where the former of the two amounts is greater than the later;
(e) where the amount under clause (d) is not paid by the 30th June of the succeeding financial year, the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service, shall, in addition to the amount of credit so paid under clause (d), be liable to pay on such amount an interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum, from the 30th June of the succeeding financial year till the date of payment of such amount;
(f) the manufacturer or the provider of output service, shall at the end of the financial year, take credit of amount equal to difference between the total of the amount of the aggregate of ineligible credit and ineligible common credit paid during the whole year and the total of the amount of annual ineligible credit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h the date of payment of the amount;
(iv) interest payable and paid, if any, determined as per the provisions of clause (e); and
(v) credit determined and taken as per the provisions of clause (f), if any, with the date of taking the credit”.
5.1 As per above Rule 6(3A), it can be seen that the only requirement is to pay the proportionate cenvat credit along with interest @ 24%. There is no provision for imposition of penalty. The penalty provisions under the Cenvat Credit Rules are provided under Rule 14 which reads as under:-
“Recovery of CENVAT credit wrongly taken or erroneously refunded. – Where the CENVAT credit has been taken and utilized wrongly or has been erroneously refunded, the same along with interest shall be recovered from the manufacturer or the provider of the output service and the provisions of sections 11A and 11AA of the Excise Act or sections 73 and 75 of the Finance Act, shall apply mutatis mutandis for effecting such recoveries.”
5.2 From the above

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Naveep Sharma and others Versus The Union of India and others

Naveep Sharma and others Versus The Union of India and others
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1650 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – TMI
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 17-5-2018
CWP No. 12490 of 2018 (O&M)
GST
MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ. AND MR. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.
For The Petitioners : Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate
ORDER
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ.(ORAL)
The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226 /227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a wr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CCT, Visakhapatnam GST Versus Sri Sitarama Lakshmi Jute Mills Pvt. Ltd

CCT, Visakhapatnam GST Versus Sri Sitarama Lakshmi Jute Mills Pvt. Ltd
Customs
2018 (5) TMI 1246 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – 2019 (370) E.L.T. 939 (Tri. – Hyd.)
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
Appeal No. E/31339/2017 – FINAL ORDER No. A/30566/2018
Customs
Hon'ble Mr. P. V. Subba Rao, Member ( Technical )
Shri P.S. Reddy, Asst. Commissioner/AR for the Appellant
None for the Respondent
ORDER
[ Order Per : P. Venkata Subba Rao ]
1. When this matter was called, nobody appeared on behalf of the respondents. The Ld. Departmental Representative explained the case as follows.
2. The assessee imported jute yarn from Bangladesh which was exempted from Basic Customs Duty and CVD. However, they paid Special Additional Duty (SAD) @ 4% as applicable and applied for refund of SAD under Notification No. 102/97-Cus. Their application for refund was rejected by the lower authority on the following grounds:
a) Para 2 (a) of the notification 102/97-Cus requires the importer t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the notification is concerned, where goods are sold on a commercial invoice, no such endorsement is required and merely not mentioning the SAD on the invoice would suffice as laid down by the Principal Bench of the Tribunal in the case of RKG International Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of C.Ex. &Cus. Noida [2013 (290)ELT 253 (Tri-Del)] and remanded it back to the Assistant Commissioner to decide the refund. The appeal of the Commissioner (Appeals) was not contested by the Department on grounds of monetary limits and therefore, has become final. Based on the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), the Assistant Commissioner sanctioned the refund. The Department appealed against this to the Commissioner (Appeals) who rejected it vide OIA No. 7/2016 [VSP]CE [D] dated 28.9.2017. This is an appeal against this OIA of the Commissioner (Appeals).
4. Condition No. 3 of the notification 102/97 says that the application for refund must be filed with the jurisdictional officer. In this case, the goods

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sioner, Vizianagaram. He could have returned the application directing it to be filed before the jurisdictional officer. Instead, he considered it on merits and passed an order rejecting it. The department appealed to Commissioner (Appeals) and it does not emerge from the OIA that the department raised this issue of jurisdiction before the Commissioner (Appeals) either. When the Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter back to the to the lower authority for sanction of refund, this order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was also not contested by the Department. The Deputy Commissioner sanctioned the refund and the department appealed against it before the Commissioner (Appeals) citing the issue of jurisdiction. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the department's appeal and hence this appeal.
6. Special Additional Duty (SAD) @ 4% was introduced to provide a level playing field to the domestic manufacturers who suffer VAT (which is not leviable on the imports). If the imported goods are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Voith Turbo Private Limited Versus CCT, Secunderabad GST

Voith Turbo Private Limited Versus CCT, Secunderabad GST
Central Excise
2018 (5) TMI 1205 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
Appeal No. E/31289/2017 – Final Order No. A/30567/2018
Central Excise
Hon'ble Mr. P.V. Subba Rao, Member (Technical)
Shri V.S. Sridhar & Shri P. Venkata Prasad, CAs for the Appellant
Shri B. Guna Ranjan, Superintendent /AR for the Respondent
ORDER
[ Order Per : P. Venkata Subba Rao ]
1. Appellant assessee are manufacturers of hydraulic/fluid couplings and they availed credit of duty paid on inputs/tax paid on input services under CENVAT Credit Rules (CCR), 2004. Their final goods are cleared both on payment of duty and without payment of duty to M/s NTPC Limited under an exemption notification. During audit by Central Excise authorities, it was found that the appellant had not reversed the CENVAT credit under Rule 6(3) on the exempted goods. It was pointed out and the appellant reversed an amount of Rs. 24,1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

edit under Rule 6(3) is not required in view of Rule 6(6)(vii), they have already reversed the same and also paid interest well before the show cause notice dated 29.09.2015 was issued. As per Section 11A(2) as they have reversed the credit and paid the interest, no show cause notice should have been issued against them. Hence, the SCN is not valid.
ii) Rule 6(6) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 reads as follows:
“(6) The provisions of sub rules (1), (2), (3), and (4) shall not be applicable in case the excisable goods removed without payment of duty are either –
(i) …………………; or
(ii) ………………..; or
(iii) ………………..; or
(iv) ……………….;or
(v) ………………..; or
(vi) ………………..; or
(vii) ………………..; or
(viii) All goods which are exempt from the duties of customs leviable under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) and the additional duty leviable under sub-section (1) of S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

defined in CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 and hence the definition of Customs Act should be relied upon. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jacsons Thevara vs. CCCE [1992(61)ELT 343 (S.C.)] held that exemption shall be read to include partial exemption.
4. The extended period of limitation is not invokable as the appellant have not wilfully contravened any Rule with intent to avoid payment of duty and had, in fact, provided all relevant information in their returns for the relevant period. Hence, wilful suppression of facts and violation of any Act or Rules with the intent to avoid payment of duty cannot be invoked.
5. The appellants are under bonafide belief that they are eligible to the impugned credit in terms of Rule 6(6)(vii) and hence extended period of limitation cannot be invoked. Interest and penalty are not payable or imposable as CENVAT Credit itself is not liable to be reversed.
6. During the hearing, Ld. Consultant appeared on behalf of the appellant and strongly reiterate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ms” under rule 6(6)(vii) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 – does it include only goods which are fully exempted or it also includes the goods which are partially exempted from the customs duty? Consequently, is the appellant required to reverse the credit as per Rule 6(3) of CENVAT credit Rules?
(ii) Has appellant resorted to fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts or violated any provisions of the Act of the Rules with an intention to avoid payment of duty resulting in extended period of limitation?
(iii) Is the appellant liable to pay interest and penalty?
9. I proceed to decide these issues. The words “goods which are exempted” are not defined in CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. However, the words “exempted goods” and “exempted services” are defined in the Rules. Both these expressions would mean that they are exempted on the whole of the duty or tax or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The expression “exempted goods” is used at several places in CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and in Rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

context of the scheme of CENVAT credit. The CENVAT Credit scheme has been designed to set off the duty paid on the inputs against the duty to be paid on the final products or services. Wherever no duty is payable on the final products, either because they are exempted or are chargeable nil rate of duty, no CENVAT credit is admissible. This principle has been well established and the rates of duty on the inputs and final products are immaterial. Even if the rate of duty of final products is merely 1% the credit of duty paid on inputs is available. However, if the final products are exempted or chargeable to nil rate of duty, no credit is admissible. This has been made clear in Rule 6(1) of CENVAT credit Rules 2004. Provisions have been made under sub rules 2, 3 & 4 of Rule 6, to ensure that where some inputs are used for exempted goods while others are used for goods on which duty has been paid, credit is available only to the extent the imports are used in dutiable goods. The harmonio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

I, therefore, find that the appellant is not exempted from reversing the credit as per Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules. The second question is whether the assessee has resorted to fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts or violation of any condition of the Act or Rules, with an intent to avoid payment of duty. I find from the records presented during hearing that the assessee in fact had filed returns in ER-I in which under the head “duty payable for clearance”, they have declared that they have availed the benefit of notification No. 12/2012. Under the head details of CENVAT credit taken and utilised, they have shown the credit utilised for payment of amount in terms of Rule 6 of CENVAT credit Rules as zero. Thus, it is evident that the assessee had declared both the fact that they have availed the exemption notification and also that they have not reversed any CENVAT credit, in their ER-I returns filed with the department. I do not find that they have suppressed any facts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Works Contract Services: Composite Supply Includes Freight and Transportation, Subject to 18% GST Rate.

Works Contract Services: Composite Supply Includes Freight and Transportation, Subject to 18% GST Rate.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – composite contracts – The applicant supplies works contract service, of which freight and transportation is merely a component and not a separate and independent identity, and GST is to be paid at 18% on the entire value of the composite supply, including supply of materials, freight and transportation, erection, commissioning etc. – AAR
TMI Updates – H

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Solar Plant Setup Deemed 'Works Contract'; Single GST Rate Applies: 5% Goods, 18% Services Not Allowed.

Solar Plant Setup Deemed 'Works Contract'; Single GST Rate Applies: 5% Goods, 18% Services Not Allowed.
Case-Laws
GST
Works Contract – transaction of setting up and operation of a solar photo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE : GE DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.

IN RE : GE DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 257 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – UTTAR PRADESH – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 45 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – UTTAR PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 16-5-2018
Order No. 4
GST
Shri Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Member (State Tax) and Dinesh Kumar, Member (Central Tax)
ORDER
M/s. GE Diesel Locomotive Private Limited, Locomotive Shed Roza, Post Roza RS, Shahjanpur, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter called the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN : 09AAGCG1589HIZA.
2.  The applicant is engaged in the business of import and manufacture of rail locomotive engines for supply to Indian Railways. The applicant had made a bid for a tender floated by the Indian Railways for supply of locomotive engines and their comprehensive maintenance. In pursuance to the bid, the applicant has been awarded a contract by President of India represented by Director, Mechanical Engineering (Works), Ministry of Railway

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

i.  There is no fixed value ascribed for goods in the contract considering these goods would be supplied depending upon condition of the locomotive at the time of maintenance.
(d)  In case services are considered as principal supply, what tax rate should be applicable?
(e)  In case of the said contract, what is the relevant place of supply and type of tax which needs to be discharged (i.e. CGST & SGST or IGST)?
4.  The applicant was granted a personal hearing on 20-4-2018. Shri Ankush Goel, Tax Head, M/s. GE Diesel Locomotive Private Ltd., and Rjeev Dewan, Consultant, M/s. GE Diesel Locomotive Private Ltd. appeared on behalf of the applicant. In the written submission, the applicant has submitted that they are engaged for supplying 1000 locomotives as well as ensuring comprehensive annual maintenance for first 500 locomotives for an agreed period at its two locomotive maintenance sheds. The first locomotive maintenance shed is being setup in the State of Uttar Pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d transported with insurance, the supply of goods, packing materials, transport and insurance is a composite supply and supply of goods is a principal supply.
And as per Section 2(74) of the CGST Act, 2017/SGST Act, 2017 has defined the term 'mixed supply' to mean –
“two or more individual supplies of goods or services, or any combination thereof, made in conjunction with each other by a taxable person for a single price where such supply does not constitute a composite supply”
Illustration – A supply of a package consisting of canned foods, sweets, chocolates, cakes, dry fruits, aerated drinks and fruit juices when supplied for a single price is a mixed supply. Each of these items can be supplied separately and is not dependent on any other. It shall not be a mixed supply if these items are supplied separately.
Further, Section 2(90) of the CGST Act, 2017 /SGST Act, 2017 has defined the term 'principal supply' to mean –
“the supply of goods or services which const

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

itions for a supply to qualify as composite supply can be highlighted as under :
a.  Two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both;
b.  The taxable supplies should be naturally bundled;
c.  The taxable supplies should be supplied in conjunction with each other; and
d.  One taxable supply should be a principal supply.
In such case, the supply which is the principal supply is treated as the main supply and the entire transaction should be eligible to GST as per the principal supply.
8.  Section 10(1)(a) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the IGST Act”) provides for determination of the place of supply of goods. In case of supply involving movement of goods, the place of supply would be the place where the goods are handed over to the recipient. The relevant extract has been given below :
“10. (1)(a) where the supply involves movement of goods, whether by the supplier or the recipient or by any other person, the place of supply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ated in India, the provisions of Section 12 of the of IGST Act, 2017 determine the place of supply of services. Sub-section (10) of Sec. 12 ibid enjoins that place of supply if service on-board a train shall be the first scheduled points of departure of the convenience. If the location of the supplier and place of are not in the same State or Union territory, it shall be treated as inter-State supply of Services and IGST shall be levied, otherwise CGST & SGST shall be levied.
If the supply of services is not made on-board a train, the location of a registered service recipient shall be the place of supply of service as per Section 12(2) ibid.
11.  The jurisdictional Commissioner, CGST i.e. the Commissioner, CGST & CX, Lucknow has also submitted views on the above said Advance Ruling application which are as under –
The activity of the party is a supply of service and principal supply of service inasmuch as the supply of goods is merely incidental to the maintenance contract. Si

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pply of service and goods is made in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course as per maintenance contracts, this maintenance service to the extent of presence of all the necessary ingredients cited in the legal provisions quoted supra, is naturally bundled with the incidental supply of goods., it is case of composite supply of service,
(b)  In case the said contract is considered as composite supply, what is the principal supply between goods or services ?
Ans. – The said contract merits to be considered to be a composite supply of service, and principal supply is service inasmuch as the supply of goods is merely incidential to the maintenance contract in the given facts and circumstances.
(c)  In case goods are considered as principal supply, how the taxability should be determined considering the following :
i.  The contract would entail supply of various goods falling under different tax brackets.
ii.  These goods would be supplied on a need basi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Essel Propack Ltd Versus CGST & CX, Thane

Essel Propack Ltd Versus CGST & CX, Thane
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 78 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 16-5-2018
Appeal No. E/85320/2018 – A/86920/2018
Central Excise
Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial)
Shri Prasad Paranjape, Advocate for appellant
Shri S.J. Sahu, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent
ORDER
Per: S.K. Mohanty
Denial of CENVAT Credit of service tax paid on the taxable services namely, pest control, telephone, repair and maintenance of air conditioner and export related services is the subject matter of the present dispute. The authorities below have denied CENVAT Credit to the appellant on the ground that the disputed services, by nature of their use/participation for the intended pur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

regard to telephone services, the contentions of the appellant were that such services were availed by the appellant for effective communication and negotiation between company employees with the suppliers/ customers, and thus, such service has been used/utilised in relation to the manufacturing activity of the appellant.
3.3 As regards the repair and maintenance of air conditioners, the appellant contended that the air conditioners were installed in the factory for ensuring smooth functioning of the machines installed therein. Thus, the same should be considered as input service. In support of said contentions, the appellant has relied on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise v. Hollister Medical Indi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or consumption of its employees. Since the disputed services were used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product and having nexus with the ultimate final product manufactured by the appellant, CENVAT Credit on the disputed services cannot be denied by the department. I find that in identical situation, this Tribunal in the above referred decisions has allowed CENVAT benefit on the pest control services and telephone charges for the employees, holding that the same merits consideration as input service.
5. In view of the above, I do not find any merits in the impugned order. Accordingly, after setting aside the same, I allow the appeal in favour of the appellant.
(Order dictated in Court)
Case laws, Decisions, Judgemen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Waives the late fee payable FORM GSTR-3B by the due date for each of the months from October, 2017 to April, 2018

Waives the late fee payable FORM GSTR-3B by the due date for each of the months from October, 2017 to April, 2018
F-A-3-16-2018-1-V-(44) Dated:- 16-5-2018 Madhya Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Madhya Pradesh SGST
Madhya Pradesh SGST
Commercial Tax Department
Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal
Bhopal, the 16th May, 2018
F-A-3-16-2018-1-V-(44).-In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 128 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the State Government,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rescind the notification no. F.17(131)ACCT/GST/2017/3199 dated 26 March 2018

Rescind the notification no. F.17(131)ACCT/GST/2017/3199 dated 26 March 2018
F.17(131)ACCT/GST/2017 Dated:- 16-5-2018 Rajasthan SGST
GST – States
Rajasthan SGST
Rajasthan SGST
GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Jaipur, dated 16th May, 2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub rule (14) of Rule 138 of Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. I, Alok Gupta, Commissioner, State Tax, on the recommendation of the council, hereb

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC on Transportation Charges

ITC on Transportation Charges
Query (Issue) Started By: – Sunil Udgave Dated:- 15-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 16-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Could we get ITC on transportation charges paid for employee pickup and droop.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Sir, in my view input tax credit is eligible.
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
If the said activity is for in the course of business it is eligible.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
I agree with both experts.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
This issue has been discussed at large, wherein, I expressed different point and ground which which may arise resulting to litigation matter. Few more point are as follows:-
1. The p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Cleaning Services for Northern Railways Subject to GST, Not Exempt Under Notification No. 09/2017, S. No. 3.

Cleaning Services for Northern Railways Subject to GST, Not Exempt Under Notification No. 09/2017, S. No. 3.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST on Service contract with railways – The cleaning service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on Railway Service Contract Using Minimal Consumables Deemed “Pure Service,” Not a Works Contract.

GST on Railway Service Contract Using Minimal Consumables Deemed “Pure Service,” Not a Works Contract.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST on Service contract with railways – the activity involve use o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

EXPORT OF SERVICE

EXPORT OF SERVICE
Query (Issue) Started By: – SAFETAB LIFESCIENCE Dated:- 15-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 16-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Friends/Experts,
We a Chennai based Pharma company have done consultancy to foreign company.
Now, we have to raise Invoice. The receiver has no GST registration in India/Tamilnadu.
Payment will be received by USD only. Hope this is GST exempted Supply (i.e) Export
of Service/Supply.
Shall we raise Invoice without charging GST ? Or shall we have to raise Invoice with GST and collect GST from party and pay to Government and to get refund from Government ???
Experts please guide us immediately please. It is urgent at our end.
Reply By Harshal Fifadra:
The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

E-way Bill – Quick review

E-way Bill – Quick review
By: – Ashwarya Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 15-5-2018

* What is an e-Way Bill?
e-way bill is a document required to be carried by a person in charge of the conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding ₹ 50,000 as mandated by the Government in terms of Section 68 of the CGST Act read with Rule 138 of the rules framed thereunder. It is generated from the GST Common Portal for e-Way bill system (www.ewaybill.nic.in) by the registered persons or transporters who cause movement of goods of consignment before commencement of such movement.
Exception:
* Principal to Job-worker and vice-versa;
* Handicraft goods by dealer exempted from GST registration.
When an eway bill is generated a unique eway bill number (EBN) is allocated and is available to the supplier, recipient, and the transporter.
When is E-way bill required?
Every registered person who causes movement of goods through a Transporter or by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8377; 50,000
The consignment value shall be determined in accordance to provisions of section 15 and shall include / exclude the following:
+ Value declared in an invoice, a bill of supply or a delivery challan,
+ Central tax, State or Union territory tax, integrated tax and cess charged, if any, in the document and
– the value of exempt supply of goods where the invoice is issued in respect of both exempt and taxable supply of goods.
– Value of any service included in the invoice (eg. Commission / Delivery Charges, etc)
Details required to generate e-Way Bill
Part A of Form GST EWB-01
On a quick perusal of the information required in Part A, it can be noticed that very limited information is required, namely:
* identity of the parties
* identity of the goods with value
* identity of the place of delivery (not place of supply)
* identity of occasion for transportation
* identity of document for transportation
Part B of Form GST EWB-01
* identity of vehicle

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nt, State Governments or a local authority.
* Goods specified as exempt from E-Way bill requirements in the respective State/Union territory GST Rules.
* Transport of certain specified goods- Includes the list of exempt supply of goods, goods treated as no supply as per Schedule III, Certain schedule to Central tax Rate notifications 7/2017-CT(R) & 26/2017-CT(R).
Any exemption for transport upto 50 Km??
* If Consignor to Transporter distance < 50 Km (Intra-state), * detail in Part B of Form GST EWB 01 may not be filled; * If Transporter to Consignee distance < 50Km (Intra-state), * detail of conveyance in Part B may not be updated Validity of e-Way Bill Type of conveyance Distance Validity of EWB (Calculated from time of generation of way bill) Other than Over dimensional cargo Less Than 100 Kms 1 Day For every additional 100 Kms or part thereof additional 1 Day For Over dimensional cargo Less Than 20 Kms 1 Day For every additional 20 Kms or part the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ill and generate consolidated e-way bill in Form GST EWB 02;
* Validity can be extended in exceptional circumstances by updating Part B;
* Way bill can be accepted / rejected by counter-part within 72 hrs of details made available or delivery of goods, earlier;
* Proper officer shall prepare Form GST EWB 03 containing detail of inspection of conveyance;
* Grievance in Form GST EWB 04 can be filed when conveyance detained for more than 30 minutes.
Timeline of implementation of GST Intra-state
Date of implementation
States
01.04.2018
Inter State across India and Karnataka
15.04.2018
Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Kerala, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh
20.04.2018
Bihar, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Tripura and Uttarakhand
25.04.2018
Arunachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, Puducherry and Sikkim
01.05.2018
Nagaland
01.06.2018
Last date for rest of the states
Reply By Abhijeet Mane as =
Dear Ashwarya,
Very Good article on e-waybill.
Dated: 15-5-2018

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Formation of “Brand Rate Cell” in ICD Mulund for fixation of Brand Rate of Drawback under the Customs, Central Excise Duties & Service Tax Drawback Rules, 2017 in the GST scenario

Formation of “Brand Rate Cell” in ICD Mulund for fixation of Brand Rate of Drawback under the Customs, Central Excise Duties & Service Tax Drawback Rules, 2017 in the GST scenario
PUBLIC NOTICE No. -73/2018 Dated:- 15-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (G) NEW CUSTOM HOUSE, ZONE-I, BALLARD ESTATE MUMBAI – 400001
F. No. S/6-B-Misc-245/2018 ICD(M)(X)
Date: 15.05.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE No. -73/2018
Subject: Formation of "Brand Rate Cell" in ICD Mulund for fixation of Brand Rate of Drawback under the Customs, Central Excise Duties & Service Tax Drawback Rules, 2017 in the GST scenario.
Attention of the Trade is invited to Board's Circular No. 38/2017- Customs dated 22.09.2017 issu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

prior to 01.07.2017 would be transferred along with all relevant documents to the Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of Customs having jurisdiction over the place of export. In case an already filed application relates to exports from multiple places, the application should be transferred to the Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of Customs having jurisdiction over any one of the places of export as per choice of the exporter. The exporter concerned may be requested to indicate his choice in this regard before the transfer of his application
4. Further, w.e.f. 01.07.2017, the work pertaining to fixation of Brand rate is to be handled by the Customs Commissionerate having jurisdiction over the place of export from where the export of g

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =