M/s. NVIS Technology Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Indore

M/s. NVIS Technology Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Indore
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 877 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Excise Appeal No. 50946 of 2018 SM – A/52085/2018-SM[BR]
Central Excise
Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial)
Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocate for the Appellants
Shri P Juneja, AR for the Respondent
Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa :
The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods and also trading activity. They were availing the benefit of cenvat credit of service tax paid on various services which are common in both the activities.
2. Revenue by entertaining a view that trading activity is an exempted service and as such the asses

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that they have not exercised an option of maintaining separate accounts, in terms of Rule 6(3). As such, they are not under legal obligation to pay such percentage of the value of the goods.
4. I find issue is no more res integra and stand decided in the following Tribunal's decisions:
1) M/s. Zim Laboratories Ltd. vs. CCE & ST, Nagpur [2018 (1) TMI 254 – CESTAT Mumbai];
2) CCE, Ghaziabad vs. Avon International Pvt. Ltd. [2017 (5) TMI 1289 -CESTAT Allahabad];
3) M/s. Orient Bell Ltd. & others vs. CCE & ST, NOIDA [2018 (3) TMI 7 – CESTAT Allahabad];
4) M/s. Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. vs. CCE & ST, Raipur [2016 (12) TMI 841-CESTAT, New Delhi]; and
5) JSW Jaigarh Port Ltd. vs. CCE, Kolhapur [2018 (2) TMI 137 -CESTAT, Mumbai]
5. It

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. A One Nuts and Edibles Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jaipur I

M/s. A One Nuts and Edibles Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jaipur I
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 775 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Excise Appeal No. 51006 of 2018 SM – A/52113/2018-SM[BR]
Central Excise
Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial)
Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocate for the Appellants
Shri H C Saini, AR for the Respondent
Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa:
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in manufacture of Processed Food (Amla Candy) falling under Chapter Heading No. 20 of the First Schedule of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It was alleged that the appellant had cleared the finished goods in bulk quantity for storage and preservation to various cold storages and the same was not processed by the cold storages except storage and preservation for time being on rental basis without obtaining permission under Rule 4(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 resulting in clearance of good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y for storage and preservation to various cold storages and the same was not processed by the cold storages except storage and preservation for time being on rental basis without obtaining permission under Rule 4(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. I have seen the copies of declarations filed by the appellant on 12.03.2012 with the Jurisdictional Divisional Officer and I find that the appellant has declared that they have appointed the cold storage to undertake job work/ preservation/ processing of their inputs namely Amla candy falling under tariff heading No. 20060000 into intermediate product namely Amla candy falling under tariff heading No. 20060000. The appellant further given the undertaking that the intermediate product which will be manufactured by the job worker will be used for manufacture of final product in their factory and shall be removed on payment of duty. It is an admitted fact in this case that the goods in question were sent to the cold storages for keeping under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Act, 1944 or of the Rules made thereunder with intent to evade payment of duty. Hence, the charges of clandestine removal of goods are not sustainable. Thus, the provisions of Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 are not applicable in this case. Accordingly, penalty in this case is imposable under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. In this regard, I place reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Tribunal in the case of Weldon Cello Plast Ltd. vs CCE Delhi-IV [2013(287)ELT0141] and Shivam Pressings vs CCE Pune-I [2015(326)ELT 351 (Tri. Mum.)] wherein it has been held that penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 can be imposed without any mens rea or wilful intention.”
4. As is seen from the above, the appellate authority has arrived at a finding that there was no malafide on the part of the assessee in the entire procedure so adopted after intimating the Revenue.
5. In such a scenario, imposition of penalty on the sole ground of non-observing of procedur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Shri Gopal Gireesh, Veena Chemicals

In Re : Shri Gopal Gireesh, Veena Chemicals
GST
2018 (6) TMI 705 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 469 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 53 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – AAR
Dated:- 29-5-2018
ORDER No. CT/4683/2018-C3
GST
Mr. Senthil Nathan S, IRS, Joint Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Central Tax & Cental Excise, Thiruvananthapuram And Mr. N. Thulaseedharan Pillai, Joint Commissioner (General), Office of the Commissioner of State Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram
RULING
1. Shri. Gopal Gireesh, Veena Chemicals, Thiruvananthapuram a retail dealer of implants for joint replacements (hereinafter called the applicant) is a registered person having GSTIN 32ADXPG4961E1ZF. The applicant has preferred an application for Advance Ruling on the rate of tax in respect of the commodities listed in the Annexure to the Application.
2. The applicant has stated in the application that all the commodities listed in the Annex

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

enclosed as Annexure are implants for joint replacements falling under HSN Code 90213100. The question to be decided is whether the products get covered under Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I of Notification No. 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting GST at the rate of 5% or Serial No. 221 of Schedule II of the Notification No.' 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting GST at the rate of 12%. The products listed in Annexure are falling under Customs Tariff Head 90213100 – Artificial Joints. Such implants for joint replacement are specifically covered under Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I of Notification No. 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Sl. No.
Chapter/Heading/Sub -Heading/Tariff Item
Description of goods
(1)
(2)
(3)
257
90 or any other Chapter
Assistive devices, rehabilitation aids and other goods for disabled, specified in List 3 appended to this Schedule
List 3:
E(9): I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s and Chapter Notes under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 has been adopted by Notification No. 01/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The Explanation appended to the Notification No. 01/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 reads as follows;
“Explanation: –
(1) In this Schedule, tariff item, heading, sub-heading and Chapter shall mean respectively a tariff item, heading, sub-heading and Chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).
(2) The rules for the interpretation of the first Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act, 1975, including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of above table.”
Accordingly, the appropriate classification as determined under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 including on an application of the Chapter Notes and General Explanatory Notes, would apply for the purpose of levy of GST.
6. As per Rule 3 of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

90 or any other Chapter
Assistive devices, rehabilitation aids and other goods for disabled, specified in List 30
List 30:
E(9): Instruments and implants for severely physically handicapped patients and joints replacement and spinal instruments and implants including bone cement.
The industry dealing in joint replacement products also avails benefit of Nil BCD on import of implants for joint replacement under the above entry.There needs to be harmonization in the interpretation I applicability I coverage of entries under the Customs Tariff and GST. Shri. Lalji Vijayan, Chartered Accountant representing the applicant further reiterated and confirmed that all the commodities as listed in the Annexure to the application by their technical I trade names are nothing but implants for joint replacement falling under Customs Tariff Heading 90213100 – Artificial Joints. In support of the above, the applicant produced sample copies of the invoices issued by M/s Johnson and Johnson Pvt Ltd

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

evident that joint replacements are specifically covered under the entry at Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I whereas the entry at Sl. No. 221 of Schedule II is a general entry that covers artificial parts of body. Therefore, applying the principle under Rule 3 of the General Rules of Interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975; that the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to headings providing a more general description we hold that the joint replacements falling under HSN Code 90213100 are covered under Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I of Notification No. 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting GSTat the rate of 5%.
RULING
The implants for joint replacements falling under HSN Code 90213100 are covered under Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I of Notification No. 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting GST at the rate of 5%.
Case

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : M/s. JJ Fabrics

In Re : M/s. JJ Fabrics
GST
2018 (6) TMI 560 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 444 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 51 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – AAR
Dated:- 29-5-2018
ORDER No. CT 15492/18-C3
GST
Senthil Nathan S IRS, Member, CGST And N. Thulaseedharan Pillai, Member, SGST
RULING
1. M/s. JJ Fabrics, Ernakulam, manufacturer of carry bags made of poly propylene non-woven fabrics, has preferred an application for Advance Ruling on the rate of tax of the same.
2. The applicant has submitted that the primary raw materials for polypropylene sheets are polypropylene granules, color master batches and filter content (calcium carbonate). These raw materials are sucked th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

abrics.
4. The applicant has submitted a copy of the test report from Centre for Biopolymer Science & Technology wherein it is certified that non woven carry bags made by the applicant is a polypropylene product with filler content 42.29%.
5. The applicant further asserted that as per the clarification issued by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Madurai the said non-woven bags comes under HSN 6305 90 00 with 2.5% CGST & 2.5% SGST if sale value does not exceed Rs. 1,000/- per piece.
6. The applicant has also referred to the clarification order C3/17556/09 dated 29.09.2009, wherein it was clarified that packing bags, textile bags, and carry bags made out of non-woven fabrics of polypropylene is covered by the HSN code 6305.33.00

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, of polyethylene or polypropylene strip or the like
9. The above HSN code appears both in Schedule I and Schedule II of Notification No. 01/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and State Notification 360/2017 dated 30.06.2017 based on the sale value of the product. The entry reads as under:
SCHEDULE 1
224
63 [other than 6309]
other made up textile articles, sets, of sale value not exceeding Rs. 1000/- per piece
SCHEDULE 2
171
63 [Other than 6309]
Other made up textile articles, sets of sale value exceeding Rs. 1,000/- per piece [other than Worn clothing and other worn articles; rags]
10. In the present case, since the sale value of non-woven carry bags made of polypropylene is less than Rs. 1,000/- per piece, it will attract

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Silicon Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Manimajra, Chandigarh Versus Union of India and others

Silicon Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Manimajra, Chandigarh Versus Union of India and others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 71 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 164 (P&H)
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 29-5-2018
CWP-13927-2018
GST
MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ AND MR TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.
For The Petitioner : Mr. Amit Jhanji, Advocate
ORDER
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ.
1. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to reopen the online portal enabling the petitioner to file its Trans-1 return on the portal and credit the Input Tax Credit (ITC) being the transitional

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

P-2) which was processed with error. The petitioner contacted the jurisdictional officer who informed the petitioner to sent a mail. Accordingly, the petitioner sent a mail dated 23.12.2017 (Annexure P-3) at helpdesk@gst.gov.in. In response thereto, the petitioner had received e-mail dated 23.12.2017 acknowledging the mail and allotted the request ID. It was mentioned in the said e-mail that they were working on the issue and would update the same to the petitioner. Further, vide e-mail dated 25.1.2018 (Annexure P-4), the petitioner was informed that since the last date of filing the Trans-1 Return was 27.12.2017 and, therefore, the same had been disabled. Accordingly, the petitioner sent a letter dated 8.3.2018 (Annexure P-5) to responden

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Pixstone Images Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai

M/s. Pixstone Images Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (6) TMI 45 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Appeal No. ST/42460 & 42461/2017 – Final Order Nos. 41644-41645 / 2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member ( Judicial )
Ms. S. Yogalakshmi, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniam, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
The issue involved in both the appeals being the same, they were heard together and are disposed by this common order.
2. The appellant had filed Rule 5 refund claim and part of the claim was rejected on the ground of being time-barred. Hence this appeal.
3. The ld. counsel Ms. S. Yogalakshmi submitted that the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e date of invoice in the case of export of services. That the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Span Infotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. – 2018 (2) TMI 946 has held that the relevant date for the purposes of deciding the time limit for consideration of refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules has to be taken the end of the quarter in which the FIRC is received and not the date of invoice. She also relied upon the decision in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai Vs. CESTAT, Chennai – 2017 (3)GSTL 45 (Mad.). wherein the jurisdictional High Court had held the issue in favour of the assessee holding that the relevant date could be the date of receipt of FIRCs.
4. The ld. AR Shri R. Subra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eived since the refund claim is filed for the quarter.
13. Revenue has expressed the view that relevant date in the case of export of services may be adopted on the same lines as the amendment carried out in the Notification No. 27/2012 w.e.f 1.3.2016. Essentially after this amendment the relevant date is to be considered as the date of receipt of foreign exchange. While this proposition appears attractive, we are also persuaded to keep in view the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vatika Township (supra), in which the Constitutional Bench has laid down the guidelines that any beneficial amendment to the statute may be given benefit retrospectively but any provision imposing burden or liability on the public can be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax, Alwar Versus Shre Nath Life Science P Ltd

Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax, Alwar Versus Shre Nath Life Science P Ltd
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 6 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Excise Appeal No. 50982 of 2018 SM – Final Order No. 52064 /2018-(SM)
Central Excise
Hon'ble Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member ( Judicial )
Shri H C Saini, AR for the Appellants
None for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa
Being aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed the present appeals. Nobody appeared for the respondent. Accordingly, I heard learned AR appearing for the Revenue and have gone through the impugned order.
2. The sole issue required to be decided in the present appeal is as to whether the services of 'Sales Commission Agents' can be held to be cenvatable and the Service Tax paid on the same is available as a credit to the assessee.
3. The appellate authority has held in favour of the respondent by observing as under:
6

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of dutiable goods on commission basis.” From this clarification itself it is understood that if a commission agent is paid commission on account of sales of goods, his services qualify to be input service and cenvat credit of service tax paid on such services is admissible to the recipient of service. I find that the issue stand settled after the said clarification itself. I find that the Hon'ble Tribunal in the case of CCE, Jallandhar vs. Ambika Overseas reported in [2010 (20) STR 514 (Tri-Del)] held that the subject activity of Commission Agent is a service used in relation to sales promotion and is covered under the definition of input services. This order of the Hon'ble Tribunal was affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana as reported in 2012 (25) STR 348 (P&H). Regarding the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Cadila Healthcare Ltd. reported in [2013 (30) STR 3 (Guj)] relied upon by the adjudicating authority, I find that in that case the Hon'b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Courts – Explanation inserted in Rule 2(l) ibid is declaratory in nature, hence, effective retrospectively. Since at this point of time, statutory provisions / grounds are available to deal with the issue in the form of clarification and Notification as discussed above, conclusion can be drawn beyond the findings of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, that the services of commission agent for sales of goods can also be considered as services used in relation to sales promotion that too when the above said notification clearly provides that „…sales promotion includes services by way of sale of dutiable goods on commission basis.” In view of the findings narrated in foregoing para, I am of the view that the cenvat credit of service tax paid on the amount of commission paid to the commission agents is available to the appellants. I do not find force in the plea of the Revenue that the subject explanation would have only prospective effect because, as recorded in the findings abo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems -reg.

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems -reg.
12/2018 Dated:- 29-5-2018 Circular
Customs
Circular No. 12/2018-Customs
F. No. 450/119/2017-Cus IV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs)
Room No. 227-B, North Block,
New Delhi dated 29th May, 2018
To,
All Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of Customs/ Customs & Central Tax / Customs (Preventive)
All Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs/ Customs & Central Tax / Customs (Preventive)
All Director Generals under CBIC.
Subject: Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems -reg.
Sir/ Madam,
A number of representations have been received from the exporters / trade associations seeking resolution of problems which have hindered sanction of refund of IGST paid on exports. From time to time, Board has

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in GSTR-1. As a result of these mismatches in the amount of IGST paid on export goods between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, the transmission of records from GSTN to Customs EDI system has not happened and consequently IGST refunds could not be processed. The problem is compounded by the fact that the facility to adjust GSTR-3B in subsequent months is not available in all cases.
3. In view of the above following procedure is being prescribed to overcome the problem of refund blockage. This would be an interim solution subject to undertakings/ submission of CA certificates by the exporters as given below and post refund audit scrutiny. The proposed procedure is as under:
A. Cases where there is no short payment:
(i) The Customs policy wing would prepare a list of exporters whose cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies, for the period July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is greater than or equal to the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of CA certificate shall affect the future IGST refunds of the exporter.
(vi) The list of exporters whose refunds have been processed as above shall be sent to DG (Audit)/ DG (GST) by the Board.
B. Cases where there is short payment:
(i) In cases where there is a short payment of IGST i.e. cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies together, for the period of July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is less than the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GSTR-1 for the same period, the Customs policy wing would send the list of such exporters to the GSTN and all the Chief Commissioner of Customs.
(ii) e-mails shall be sent by GSTN to each exporter referred in para (i) above so as to inform the exporter that their records are held up due to short payment of IGST. The email shall also advise the exporters to observe the procedure under this circular.
(iii) The exporters would have to make the payment of IGST equal to the short payment in G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

would return the refund amount in case it is found to be not due to them at a later date.
(vi) The Customs zones shall compile the list of exporters (GSTIN only), who have come forward to claim refund after making requisite payment of IGST towards short paid amount and complied with other prescribed requirements.
(vii) The compiled list may be forwarded to Customs policy wing, DG (Audit) and DG (GST). Customs policy wing shall forward the said list of GSTINs to GSTN. On receipt of the list of exporters from Customs policy wing, GSTN shall transmit the records of those exporters to Customs EDI system.
(viii) The exporters whose refunds are processed/ sanctioned as above would be required to submit another certificate from Chartered Accountant before 31st October, 2018 to the same Customs office at the port of export to the effect that there is no discrepancy between the IGST amount refunded on exports and the actual IGST amount paid on exports of goods for the period July' 2017 to Ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Proportinate itc concept in gst on sale on used car

Proportinate itc concept in gst on sale on used car
Query (Issue) Started By: – Shubham Porwal Dated:- 28-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 1-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 8 Replies
GST
Hello everyone… I am new user here …please help me …! If one purchased furniture for rs 1lac and gst 28,000 total 1,28,000 and sold it just after 2years… what shall be the impact on itc …will it be claimable upto rs 28,000 or any proportionate reduction should be made …..?
Please reply….!
Thanks
Shubham
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
If purchased furniture is booked as capital goods in your books of Account, than 5 point per quarter is to be reduced.
If not booked as capital goods, then it is normal supply.
Our e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input Credit on Flight Tickets

Input Credit on Flight Tickets
Query (Issue) Started By: – mvs kumar Dated:- 28-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 28-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
Please share your views on input credit to be taken on flight tickets. Because I heard that all the sectors are not possible. Only the sector from where the travel origin starts. Also the sectors which we need to take only when we do take ISD registration.
What is the correct practice industry is following?
Reply By YAGAY a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

No change in the GST law and taxation relating to farmers since July, 2017; Support Services to agriculture, forestry, fishing or animal husbandry are exempt from GST; Agriculturists are also exempted from taking GST Registration

No change in the GST law and taxation relating to farmers since July, 2017; Support Services to agriculture, forestry, fishing or animal husbandry are exempt from GST; Agriculturists are also exempted from taking GST Registration
GST
Dated:- 28-5-2018

It has been reported in certain section of the Press that certain changes have been made in GST law relating to farmers, which will come into force with effect from 1st June, 2018 according to which farmers would be required to take registration and pay GST of 18% when they lease out their land.
This news is factually incorrect and misleading. There has been No Change in the GST law and taxation relating to farmers since July, 2017, when GST was implemented. Support services to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SAC FOR INTEREST ON LOANS

SAC FOR INTEREST ON LOANS
Query (Issue) Started By: – S.C. WADHWA Dated:- 28-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 28-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
What is SAC for interest on loans exmpted under GST.
Reply By Nitika Aggarwal:
The Reply:
Dear Sir,
SAC for Services by way of extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount (other than interest involved in credit card services); is covered under heading 99

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST ISSUES REQUIRING ADDRESS BY GST

GST ISSUES REQUIRING ADDRESS BY GST
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 28-5-2018

Even after close to eleven months since GST was launched in India w.e.f. 1st July, 2017, trade & industry and taxpayers / professionals are confronted with various issues which are required to be sorted out, clarified by CBIC or redressed. Moreover, we have now Authority for Advance Ruling which is also contributing to the confusions.
Here are few issues and concerns identified to be addressed/ redressed by appropriate forum, sooner the better.
* The last date for filing of TRAN 1 was 27.12.2017, but many of the taxpayers failed to file TRAN-1 due to genuine reasons other than IT glitches. Though for IT related compliance, additional window has since been opened vide Circular No. 39/2018 dated 03.04.2018, there are large number of cases wherein TRAN-1 could not be filed due to ignorance or other reasons. One more option may be provided to the assessees, as it

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

anually by the taxpayer which involves a huge risk of wrong calculation therefore, such penalty/ interest / debits may be generated by GSTN System only instead of doing manually.
Currently the benefit of composition scheme is available to limited taxpayers, therefore, the composition scheme should be extended to service providers and for Inter-state supplies also.
There are certain wherein Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) have ruled on taxability of those transactions, for e.g.:
* Supply of motor vehicles as scrap after its usage is considered as an activity of 'supply' in course or furtherance of business and such transaction would attract GST (AAR). This should not be treated as supply or be exempted from GST.
* Recovery of food expenses by employer from the employees for the canteen services/working lunch provided by business entity is considered as 'Outward Supply' and hence taxable (AAR). It may be considered as part of CTC or as a perquisite & should not be taxed.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to SEZ employees may not be treated as supply to SEZ (AAR). Supplies related to SEZ are zero rated and since SEZ/SEZ units are artificial judicial persons, they will always be acting through natural persons and as such, keeping in mind the legislative intention of zero rating in case of SEZ's. A suitable clarification is immediately required.
Query: Since there is no appellate mechanisms against AAR ruling at the moment assessee are stuck up for proper legal guidance & clarity
Suggestion: GST Council should setup a review mechanism for review of such rulings and avoiding different rulings by different States AAR.
The time life for pronouncement of advance ruling may be shortened.
Credit of motor vehicle used for business purposes should be allowed to all business entities. Purchase of vehicle for business purposes is a capital asset and forms part of gross block. Like any other capital good, motor vehicles are also crucial as a huge amount of ITC lapses even when assets are us

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of GST, if not fully exempting it. Coaching is an important revenue earner for many States in many ways.
To promote tourism in the State, GST Council may be approached to reduce the GST rates on admission tickets.
Presently medical implants (e.g. Jaipur foot) are taxed @ 5%. Keeping in view noble services provided in the State; it deserves a better tax treatment by exempting the same.
E-way Bill System
* Training in relation to e-way bill should be provided for smooth implementation. Majority of pending litigation is an account of seizure and detention of goods. In almost all cases, courts have ordered for release of goods / vehicle.
Most of the transporters (GTA / GTO) are in unorganized sector and also not adequately educated. To ensure successful implementation of e-way bill system necessary training need to be imparted to transporters and drivers in Hindi / Regional Language.
Since the implantation is new it should be ensured that atleast in this initial period :
* Pen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Unjustenrichment – Issue of Credit Note

Unjustenrichment – Issue of Credit Note
Query (Issue) Started By: – CA.LALIT MUNOYAT Dated:- 28-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 30-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
Can a supplier issue a Credit Not to its recipient for GST collected in excess, on downward revision of the price after the supply was made. The original invoice to which the CN is mapped shows GST collected on the Full value calculated at the original rate. This will reduce the output liability of the Supplier. IS such a CN equal to to the Refund as envisaged in the ACT.
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
In our view if your customer reverse the ITC then you will be able to get the refund otherwise not.
Reply By Nitika Aggarwal:
The Reply:
Dear si

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

JAY MALHOTRA:
The Reply:
Very concise and brief reply by Yagay and Sun. Agreed.
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
Thanks Sanjay Sir.
Reply By CA.LALIT MUNOYAT:
The Reply:
The issue has different connotations under different circumstances. However the rule that has been determined by the SC is being consistently followed by the lower authorities. The decision depends upon whether the discount given was known at the time of Sale or not. The following judgment clears the situation:
2018 (2) TMI 1105 – CESTAT MUMBAI
MAHANAGAR GAS LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI
Refund claim – trade discount – price variation clause – Held that: – the trade discount was not known to prior to the clearance and thus at the time of cle

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and understood at the time of removal in form of price circulars, price lists, discount policy, circulated among the dealers their deduction from the assessable value would have to be allowed in view the Apex Courts judgment in the Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. M/s. Madras Rubber Factory [ 1986 (12) TMI 35 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ] (supra) even if the same were quantified, subsequently, subject to the conditions that the same had actually been passed on to the buyers. If the discounts, in question, are deductible from the assessable value, the respondent would be eligible for refund subject to the provisions of Section 11b of the Central Excise Act, 1944 i.e. and being not hit by the principle of unjust enrichment.
March 28

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

LATEST MESSAGE REGARDING REFUND OF IGST AGST REBATE EXPORT DUE TO RETURN MISMATCH AND LATEST SOLUTION AT GST ICEGATE SITE

LATEST MESSAGE REGARDING REFUND OF IGST AGST REBATE EXPORT DUE TO RETURN MISMATCH AND LATEST SOLUTION AT GST ICEGATE SITE
Query (Issue) Started By: – nandankumar roy Dated:- 28-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 28-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
DEAR SIR,
ISGT REFUND OVERDUE AMOUNT AGAINST EXPORT SALES OF REBATE CLAIM , WHERE GOING TO CHECK AT ICE GATE AS PER LATEST POSITION OF GST SITE, WHERE 3.1(B) AND GSTR1 RETURN MISMATCH DUE TO EXPORT FIGURE SHOWN IN 3.1(A) INSTEAD

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. IAC Electricals (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & C. EX (Appeal-I) Kolkata

M/s. IAC Electricals (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & C. EX (Appeal-I) Kolkata
Central Excise
2019 (1) TMI 699 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 28-5-2018
E/75895/2018 – FO/76593/2018
Central Excise
Shri P.K.Choudhary, Member (Judicial)
For the Appellant(s) : Shri Amitabha Lahiri, Advocate
For the Revenue : Shri A. K. Biswas, Suptd. (A. R.)
ORDER
PER SHRI P.K.CHOUDHARY
Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Transmission Hardware fittings used in High Tension Power Transmission lines classifiable under Chapter 73 & 76 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Appellant sells its products to various State Electricity

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

3A, Part-II, Entry Serial No. 11 dated 26/02/2013 and also paid Rs. 30,000/- in cash on account of interest vide GAR-7 Challan No. 50473 dated 26/02/2013.
3. Being aggrieved, by the O.I.O. dt. 13/03/2014, the Revenue filed the appeal before the First Appellate Authority against the Order-in- Original No. R/01/C.Ex./Refund/Behala/Kol-V/13-14.
4. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal filed by the Department by setting aside the Order-in-Original dated 13/03/2014 and remanded the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority for fresh decision. The Assessee has preferred this appeal.
5. The Ld. Advocate appearing on behalf of the Appellant Company submits that after Post-Audit verification of the refund of Rs. 1,82,901/- , the D

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

wed the refund but directed the appellant to pay back the cash refund along with interest. If this is to be done without crediting equivalent amount in electronic credit ledger then, it would lead to holding back money by the Government which is not due to the exchequer.
6. The Ld. DR reiterates the order of the Lower Appellate Authority.
7. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records.
8. I find that in the facts and circumstances of the present case, since refund has been made in cash and not by crediting in the Cenvat Credit account of the appellant, the appellant is not getting additional credit for which it has to pay more in cash and less through CENVAT Credit Account. Thus, in effect, it does not make any difference so far, pay

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ICES advisory 22/2018 (IGST Refund) – Officer Interface for SBs with other errors

ICES advisory 22/2018 (IGST Refund) – Officer Interface for SBs with other errors
38 / 2018 Dated:- 28-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CHENNAI VIII (GENERAL)
CUSTOM HOUSE, NO.60 RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI – 600 001.
Telephone: 25254444 – FAX:25224622
www.chennaicustoms.gov.in
F.No.S.Misc.09/2018 Sys Unit
Dated: 28/05/2018
PUBLIC NOTICE 38 / 2018
Sub: regarding
Kind attention of Exporters/ Customs Brokers is invited to Para 2(ii) of Board's Circular 08/2018 dated 23.03.2018 regarding Refund of IGST paid on Exports – Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and clarification in other cases.
2. In consonance with Para 2(ii) of the Board's Circular 08/2018 dated 21.03.2018,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ionally, IGST Refund in respect of SBs with error code SB003, where the exporter has either declared a different GSTIN in the SB or has only declared PAN, and the corresponding returns have been filed through another GSTIN with the same PAN, can also be sanctioned through the Officer Interface. In such cases, an undertaking may be obtained from the GST registered unit which has filed the returns that they have no objection to the refund being granted to the exporter who has filed the Shipping Bill and that they will not claim any IGST Refund for exports under that SB separately. Once satisfied, the officer may sanction the applicable IGST Refund through the Officer Interface.
5. If any difficulty is faced in this regard, it may be brought

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Nipro India Corporation Private Limited

In Re: Nipro India Corporation Private Limited
GST
2018 (10) TMI 745 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 289 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 28-5-2018
GST-ARA-33/2018-19/B-41
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Nipro India Corporation Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question :
“Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the input tax credit of tax paid on costs proposed to be incurred in relation to activities mentioned in Annexure 4 can be treated as 'admissible under the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

effect from 1st July 2017, is located at Plot No. E-1, MIDC, Kesurdi, Khandala, Taluka-Khandala, Dist. Satara-412 801.
1.2 The Applicant is engaged in the manufacturing of medical equipments such as dialyzers, blood tubing sets, arterial fistulas, syringes and needles.
1.3 The Applicant runs a manufacturing facility at Shirwal, Maharashtra. Goods manufactured by the Applicant are sold within India and also exported outside India.
1.4 The Applicant proposes to undertake an extension of its manufacturing facility ('Extension Project') located at MIDC, Kesurdi, Khandala, Taluka-Khandala, Dist. – Satara. The Applicant has awarded a contract to a vendor for the execution of this Extension Project.
1.5 The list of activities and nature of costs proposed to be undertaken/ incurred under the Extension Project are provided in Annexure 4.
1.6. Based on the activities, the costs proposed to be incurred under the Extension Project can be broadly bifurcated into the following categories:
i. C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on of admissibility of input tax credit in respect of the aforementioned activities
The Applicant prefers to present the application before this Hon'ble Authority on the following, among other grounds, each of which is taken in the alternative and without prejudice to the others.
1. Applicant's interpretation of law or facts:
1.1 According to Section 16 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017, every registered person is entitled to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both to him which are used or intended to be used by him in the course or furtherance of his business.
1.2 Accordingly to Section 16 (2) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with the second proviso to the section, among others, the following conditions need to be satisfied for the purpose of availing input tax credit:
i. The recipient is in possession of a tax invoice or debit note issued by a registered supplier;
ii. The recipient has received the goods or services or both;
iii. The tax charged in res

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ccount including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business.
Explanation. For the purposes of clauses (c) and (d), the expression “construction” includes re-construction, renovation, additions or alterations or repairs, to the extent of capitalisation, to the said immovable property;
Explanation.-For the purposes of this Chapter and Chapter VI, the expression “plant and machinery” means apparatus, equipment, and machinery fixed to earth by foundation or structural support that are used for making outward supply of goods or services or both and includes such foundation and structural supports but excludes-
(i) land budding or any other civil structures;
(ii) telecommunication towers; and
(iii) pipelines laid outside the factory premises.
“(emphasis supplied)
1.4 The above provision suggests that no input tax credit would be available in respect of:
i. works contract services received for construction of an immovable propert

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

chanical Works' and 'Electrical Works' is provided in Annexure 4.
1.6 The term 'plant and machinery' has been defined under Explanation II to Section 17 (5) of the CGST Act, 2017 to mean any apparatus, equipment and machinery fixed to earth by foundation or structural support and used for making outward supplies. However, 'plant and machinery excludes land, building, or any other civil structures, telecommunication towers and pipelines laid outside the factory premises. Therefore, it is evident that input tax credit of 'plant and machinery', unless specifically excluded, is available when used for making outward supplies
1.7 The Applicant submits that none of the costs mentioned in Annexure 4 fall within the scope of exclusions specified under Explanation Il to Section 17 (5) of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore the question that merits consideration is whether these 'plant and machinery can be said to have been used for making outward supplies.
1.8 The usage of plant and machinery for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

edical purposes.
1.10. Similarly, the plumbing work is essential/ indispensable in the manufacturing facility because the products manufactured by the Applicant require purified RO water to adhere to minimum quality requirements, failing which the products manufactured will not be suitable for their required medical purposes. The manufacturing process results into discharge of hazardous waste which is required to be disposed in an environment friendly manner, failing which the Applicant would be in violation of statutory environmental regulations.
1.11. The issue of determining whether goods can be said to be used in the manufacture of goods or not has been dealt with by the Supreme Court in the case of J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills co. Ltd. vs. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur [1997 (91) E.L.T. 34 (S.C.)) =1964 (10) TMI 2 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [Enclosed as Annexure 5). In this case, the issue was regarding the eligibility of goods to be included in the registration certificate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uld, in our judgment, fall within the expression “in the manufacture of goods.”
9. In our judgment if a process or activity is so integrally related to the ultimate manufacture of goods so that without that process or activity manufacture may, even if theoretically possible, by commercially inexpedient goods intended for use in the process or activity as specified in Rule 13 will qualify for special treatment.
12. …. in a factory manufacturing cotton and other textiles, certain electrical equipment in the present stage of development would be commercially necessary. For instance, without electric lighting it would be very difficult to carry on the business. Again electrical humidifiers, exhaust fans and similar electrical equipment would in the modern conditions of technological development normally be regarded as equipment necessary to effectually carry on the manufacturing process. We are not prepared to agree with the High Court that in order that “electrical equipment” should f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fall under the definition of plant and machinery. Since the same are used for making outward supplies, the input tax credit in relation to costs incurred for such activities should be available.
Conclusion:
Basis the above submissions, in the current case, the Applicant believes that input tax credit in relation to costs incurred for 'Mechanical Works' and 'Electrical Works' should be admissible as such costs pertain to construction of plant and machinery.
Further to above submissions, we most respectfully pray that:
* Allow us to reiterate all the submissions without prejudice to one another;
* Grant a personal hearing to put forth our contentions and explain our submissions before passing any order in this regard;
* Allow us to amend, alter and add to the present application;
* Allow us to produce additional documents and other material during the time of Personal Hearing; and
* Pass such orders and directions as may be deemed proper and necessary.
03. CONTENTION – AS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed at Sr. No. 3 & 4 of Annexure -4 (Mechanical & Electrical Works) to the application is available to the applicant, in absence of any such restriction. The applicant has already agreed that no ITC is available in relation to civil works. As such it appears that there is no infirmity in the interpretation of the applicant.
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for Preliminary hearing on dt. 28.032018 with respect to admission or rejection of present application when Ms. Aabha S Lekhak, Sh. Kanval Ashar and Mr. Shivraj Mhaske, Advocates along with Sh. Manoj Pawar, Senior Executive appeared and made oral submissions requesting for admission of application as per their contentions made in ARA. (They were orally requested to make submissions with respect to specific contracts in execution of work in the project and were also requested to clarify in detail their eligibility of cenvat credit in respect of all sub-heading under mechanical and electrical works as given in their ARA individually

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

number ('GSTIN') AADCN1920C1ZZ with effect from 1st July 2017. The Applicant is engaged in the manufacturing of medical equipment such as dialyzers, blood tubing sets, arterial fistulas, syringes and needles.
2. The Applicant runs a manufacturing facility at Shirwal, Maharashtra. Goods manufactured by the Applicant are sold within India and also exported outside India. The Applicant proposes to undertake an extension of its manufacturing facility ('Extension Project') located at MIDC, Kesurdi, Khandala, Taluka- Khandala, Dist. – Satara. The Applicant has awarded a contract to a vendor for the execution of this Extension Project. The list of activities and nature of costs proposed to be undertaken/ incurred under the Extension Project are provided in Annexure 4 by the Applicant.
3. Further factual position as stated by the applicant in his application is as under
He submitted that based on the activities, the costs proposed to be incurred under the Extension Project can be broadly b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed break up of activities proposed to be undertaken in the nature of 'Mechanical Works' and 'Electrical Works' is provided in Annexure 4.
In view of the above submissions and contentions of the applicant we first of all refer to the provisions under the GST Act with respect to availment of input tax credit which would be applicable to the facts of the present ease as stated and submitted by the applicant.
We find that only two sections of the GST Act being, Section 16- in respect of eligibility and conditions for taking input tax credit and Section 17 which provides for apportionment of credit and blocked credits would require reference in respect of the questions raised in the present application.
In view of Section 16 and Section 17 of the GST Act being extremely important and relevant for decision in the present case, both these Sections are reproduced as under:-
Section 16. (1) Every registered person shall, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed and i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fore or during movement of goods, either by way of transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise;
(c) subject to the provisions of section 41, the tax charged in respect of such supply has been actually paid to the Government, either in cash or through utilization of input tax credit admissible in respect of the said supply; and
(d) he has furnished the return under section 39:
Provided that where the goods against an invoice are received in lots or instalments, the registered person shall be entitled to take credit upon receipt of the last lot or instalment:
Provided further that where a recipient fails to pay to the supplier of goods or services or both, other than the supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis, the amount towards the value of supply along with tax payable thereon within a period of one hundred and eighty days from the date of issue of invoice by the supplier, an amount equal to the input tax credit availed by the recipient shall be added to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

services or both are used by the registered person partly for the purpose of any business and partly for other purposes, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the purposes of his business.
(2) Where the goods or services or both are used by the registered person partly for effecting taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies under this Act or under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act and partly for effecting exempt supplies under the said Acts, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the said taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies.
(3) The value of exempt supply under sub-section (2) shall be such as may be prescribed, and shall include supplies on which the recipient is liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, transactions in securities, sale of land and, subject to clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule II, sale of building.
(4) A banking company or a financi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
(b) the following supply of goods or services or both-
(i) food and beverages, outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery except where an inward supply of goods or services or both of a particular category is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply;
(ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre;
(iii) rent-a-cab, life insurance and health insurance except where
(A) the Government notifies the services which are obligatory for an employer to provide to its employees under any law for the time being in force; or
(B) such inward supply of goods or services or bo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

both on which tax has been paid under section 10;
(f) goods or services or both received by a non-resident taxable person except on goods imported by him;
(g) goods or services or both used for personal consumption;
(h) goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples; and
(i) any tax paid in accordance with the provisions of sections 74, 129 and 130.
(6) The Government may prescribe the manner in which the credit referred to in sub-sections (1) and (2) may be attributed.
Explanation.For the purposes of this Chapter and Chapter VI, the expression “plant and machinery” means apparatus, equipment, and machinery fixed to earth by foundation or structural support that are used for making outward supply of goods or services or both and includes such foundation and structural supports but excludes-
(i) land, building or any other civil structures;
(ii) telecommunication towers; and
(iii) pipelines laid outside the factory premises.
Thus f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s prescribed.
We find that apart from conditions as laid down under Section 16 of the GST Act, Section 17 provides for restrictions and factual position and situations where ITC would not be available. The same are very clear from plain reading of Section 17 as referred and detailed above.
Thus in view of the above factual position we find that at the time of the hearing we had requested the applicant that taking into consideration the specific contracts in execution of the project, they were required to clarify in detail their eligibility of input tax credit in respect of all sub heading under mechanical and electrical works as given in their ARA individually.
We find that the applicant as per request above at the time of the Final Hearing had submitted details with respect to nature. function, use, utility and its relation to plant or machinery or to their business which would be relevant to ascertain their eligibility for ITC claims in their application. The details as submitted

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s is structural support for mechanical and electrical works used for making outward supplies.
Explanation to sub section V and VI of Section 17 of the CGST Act.
Not admissible as the civil work is not in relation to plant and machinery and is not covered in the explanation.
4
Mechanical work
Plumbing
Internal and domestic water distribution supply system
Yes
Internal and domestic water distribution supply system is used to provide drinking water and water for sanitation to the employee working on the production
Relevant extracts of the factories act 1948.
Not admissible as the goods are used construction of immovable for property which are not used for making outward supply of goods or services but are installed in order to comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 18 & 19 of the Factories Act, 1948 and Rule 49 of Maharashtra Factory Rules 1963 and therefore not eligible as per Section 17(5) of the GST Act.
5
 
 
External sewage system
Yes
The external

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s.
Explanation to sub section V and VI of Section 17 of the CGST Act.
Admissible
9
 
 
Dismantling Work
No
___
___
Not Admissible
10
 
Fire Protection Work
Internal Fire Hydrant
System
Yes
Equipments or apparatus used for fire protection on the production floor.
Relevant extracts of the Factories Act, 1948 and Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963.
Not admissible as it does not fall under the definition of P&M as given in Explanation in Section 17 of the GST Act
11
 
 
Sprinkler Works
 
 
 
Not admissible as it does not fall under the definition of P&M as given in Explanation in Section 17 of the GST Act
12
 
 
Extinguishers
 
 
 
Not admissible as it does not fall under the definition of P&M as given in Explanation in Section 17 of the GST Act
13
 
 
Fire Documentation
 
 
 
Not admissible as it does not fall under the definition of P&M as given in Explanati

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

floor.
Explanation to sub section V and VI of Section 17 of the CGST Act.
Admissible
21
 
 
Steam Supply System
 
Steam is used in the production process to maintain the specific required temperature. In order to manufacture Hollow Fibres, constant supply of steam is required to maintain the specific temperature.
Explanation to sub section V and VI of Section 17 of the CGST Act.
Admissible
22
 
 
Process Chilled Water Supply System
 
The processed chilled water supply system is essential for supplying chilled water for production or product cooling process. In order to manufacture Hollow Fibres, constant supply of processed chilled water is required to maintain the specific temperature.
Explanation to sub section V and VI of Section 17 of the CGST Act.
Admissible
23
 
 
Purified Water Supply System
 
The purified water supply system is essential for supplying purified water to be used in the production process.
Expl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CGST Act.
Admissible
27
 
 
HSD-Oil Supply System
 
The HSD-Oil supply system is used to supply fuel for the boiler for steam generation. Steam is used in the production process to maintain the specific required temperature. In order to manufacture Hollow Fibres, constant supply of steam is required to maintain the specific temperature.
Explanation to sub section V and VI of Section 17 of the CGST Act.
Admissible
28
Electrical Works
Sub-Station Work
 
Yes
The sub-station is used for electricity supply for production / utilities for production.
Explanation to sub section V and VI of Section 17 of the CGST Act.
Admissible except for civil construction work if any.
29
 
DG Set Power Supply System
 
 
The DG set power supply system is used for electricity back up for production / utilities for production
Explanation to sub section V and VI of Section 17 of the CGST Act.
Admissible except for civil construction work if any.
30
&n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

are an essential facility.
Relevant extracts of the Maharashtra Factories Rules. 1963.
Admissible except for civil construction work if any.
34
 
Telephone System
 
 
Intercom and external communication systems is a basic necessity to facilitate communication within and outside the factory premises.
Relevant extracts of the Maharashtra Factories Rules. 1963.
Admissible except for civil construction work if any.
35
 
LAN System
 
 
LAN connectivity of computers on production floor with main server used for configuring commands for operation of machines.
Explanation to sub section V and VI of Section 17 of the CGST Act.
Admissible except for civil construction work if any.
36
 
Fire Alarm System
 
 
Fire alarm system for production floor.
Relevant extracts of the Maharashtra Factories Rules. 1963.
Admissible except for civil construction work if any.
37
 
Public Address System
 
 
Public address s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: TEMPLE PACKAGING PVT. LTD.

IN RE: TEMPLE PACKAGING PVT. LTD.
GST
2018 (9) TMI 690 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, DAMAN, DIU AND DADAR AND NAGAR HAVELI – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 350 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, DAMAN, DIU AND DADAR AND NAGAR HAVELI – AAR
Dated:- 28-5-2018
Order No. 02/AR/SK-CP/ Daman/2017-18
GST
SHRI SATISH KUMAR AND CHARMIE KAMAL PAREKH MEMBER
M/s Temple Packaging Pvt Ltd, Survey No 171/3 &7, Behind Olive Healthcare, Hatiyawad, village- Dabhel, Nani Daman – 396210. Having GSTIN Number 251800000005AR4, is engaged in the printing of leaflets (further divided as insert/outsert) .They have made an application on 19.03.2018 under advance Ruling for printed leaflet supplied by the Applicant to ascertain the correct classification as to whether the same falls under the category of supply of goods falling under CHS No. 4901 or supply of service under SAC No.9989 and for that they have paid the required fee amounting to Rs. 5,000/- for Central GST and Rs. 5,000/- f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

raw materials namely paper/ink with the contents supplied by the purchaser of leaflet to whom leaflets were sold by the Applicant on principal to principal basis. The issue to be decided as to whether same had to be considered as supply of goods falling under Chapter Sub-heading No.4901 attracting GST @5% as per Sr.No.201 of Schedule-1 of Noti.No.1/2017-CT (Rate) 28.6.2017 or as a supply of service falling under SAC No.9989 attracting GST @12% as per Sr.No.27 (1) of Noti.No.11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.6.2017, as amended (GST rate 18% up to 12.10.2017 and thereafter 12%)
3.1 They submitted that since 2005 they were clearing printed leaflets on outright sale basis and clearing the same under CSH No.4901 as exempted being not chargeable to duty. Accordingly w.e.f. 1.7.2017, the Applicant continued supplying the same under the category of goods falling under Chapter sub-heading No. 4901. However, w.e.f. 29.8.2017 the Applicant after intimating the Assistant Commissioner of CGST & CE vide

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Merits Classification under the category of supply of goods falling under CSH No. 4901 only on following grounds.
3.3.1 They submitted that Goods is defined under Section 2(52) of the CGST Act, 2017 as per which goods means every kind of moveable property other than money and security. Service was defined as per Section 2(102) of the CGST Act, 2017 as per which service means anything other than goods. The leaflet sold is nothing but one kind of moveable property and falls under the category of goods only.
3.3.2 They submitted that as per Para No.2 and 3 of CBEC Circular 11/11/2017-GST dated 20.10.2017 the printing contracts falls under the category of composite supply and the classification had to be decided on the basis of supply which constitutes the principal supply. Principal supply was defined at Section 2(90) as per which supply of goods or services which constitutes the pre-dominant element of composite supply and to which any other supply forming part of that composite suppl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

falling under heading 9989 of the scheme of classification of services.
3.4 They submitted that as per the above clarification the printed matter will fall under SAC No.9989 when the content was supplied by the publisher or a person who owns users right to the intangible inputs. The SAC No.998911 covers publishing on a fee or a contract basis and SAC No. 998912 covers printing and reproduction service of recorded media on a fee or a contract basis. There was no coverage of printed leaflet in SAC No.9989. Accordingly Sr.No.27 (1) of Noti.No.11/2017-CT (Rate) only covers publishing matter like news paper/books/generals/periodicals made on the basis of content supplied by publisher and Sr.No.27(2) inter-alia covers printing and re-production services of recorded media.
3.5 They submitted that accordingly printed leaflet manufactured with their own raw materials and as per content supplied by customer (other than publisher or person who owns the users right to the intangible input) does

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and practical note book printed on the basis of the contents supplied by the clients falling under Chapt.48 & 49 depending upon the applicability of the chapter notes.
2
2001 (129) E.L.T. 486 (Tri. – Mum.)  = 2000 (12) TMI 404 – CEGAT, MUMBAI Books – Basic engineering technical documents and drawings consisting of about 300 pages of printed paper containing either written material or drawings bound in metal clip binding with covers on either side are books classifiable under Heading 49.01 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 entitled to exemption under Notification No. 25/95-Cus. (para 4]
3
2001 (134) E.L.T. 156 (Tri. – Kolkata) = 2000 (11) TMI 681 – CEGAT, KOLKATA Advertising material – Folded leaflet titled “143 ways to export your sound” -Classifiable under sub-heading 4911.10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 corresponding to ITC (HS) Exim Code No. 491110.02 which required a specific license for importation, [para 3]
4
2001 (136) E.L.T. 1420 (Tri. – Mumbai) = 2001 (7) TMI 615 – CEGAT,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d sold, cannot be commercially known as marketable – Revenue not discharged burden of test of marketability of the product – Impugned order set aside – Section 3 of Central Excise Act, 1944. [para 5]
6
2017 (6) G.S.T.L. 198 (Tri. – All.) = 2017 (11) TMI 812 – CESTAT ALLAHABAD Carbon leaflets/Money receipts – Classification of – Product being a printed sheet running in length and used by specific customer for specified purpose classifiable under Chapter 49 of Central Excise Tariff as product of printing industry and not under Chapter 48 ibid, [paras 4, 5, 6]
7
2017 (349) E.L.T. 499 (Tri. – All.) = 2017 (8) TMI 991 – CESTAT ALLAHABAD Paper – Interleaved Carbon Papers/Money Receipts running in length meant for specific customer for specific purpose, classifiable under Chapter 49 of Central Excise Tariff as a product of printing industry, [paras 3,4, 5,6]
8
2018 (8) G.S.T.L. 444 (Tri. – All.) = 2018 (2) TMI 65 – CESTAT ALLAHABAD Interleaved Carbon Papers/Money Receipts running in len

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aining particular type of contents – Envelope classifiable under specific Heading 4817 of Central Excise Tariff – Leaflets and printed materials when cleared, classifiable under other printed matter under Heading 4911 of Central Excise Tariff as products of printing industry, [para 5]
10
Noti.No. 2005 (186) E.L.T. 532 (S.C.) = 2005 (8) TMI 657 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Books – Printed books – Designs, drawings and plans in the form of FEEP (Front End Engineering Package) imported under know-how and basic Engineering Agreement whether classifiable under Heading 49.01/49.06 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with Notification Nos. 107/93-Cus. and 38/94-Cus. or classifiable under sub-heading 4911.99 ibid – CEGAT disposed off appeals merely on the basis of Larger Bench decision in case of Parasrampuria Synthetics Ltd. v. Commissioner [(Tribunal)] = 2000 (5) TMI 66 – CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI and not considered rival contentions on merits nor recorded findings thereon – Two Judges Benc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1.99 ibid as per HSN explanatory notes, [para 54]
Classification of goods – Priority to be given to main entry and not residual entry – Drawings, designs and plans – Specific or basic entry is Heading 49.01 and residual entry is Heading 49.11 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. [para 57]
11
2001 (133) E.L.T. 9 (S.C.) = 2001 (8) TMI 122 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Printed Matter – Printed drawings, designs and plans imported in 97 volumes under the Foreign Transfer of Technology Agreement for setting up a plant to manufacture Polyester, Polyester Filament Yarn and Polyester Staple Fibre -Contains documents in loose sheets merely put up in a folder – Not covered by the term 'printed book' under SI. No. 10 of Notification No. 25/95-Cus. but are covered by SI. No. 15 as plans, drawings and designs – Appeals allowed -Headings 49.06 and 49.11 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. – In terms of the agreement between the parties, these documents cannot but be attributed to be technical know-how in the shape o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lane – Law Lexicon attributes it to be a design or a sketch and is a draft or form of representation and its synonyms are sketch and design – Notification No. 25/95-Cus. [para 6]
Words and Phrases – 'Drawing' in common acceptance means and includes 'art of representing by line, delineation without colour or with single colour' -Corpus Juris Secundum defines it as a representation on a plane surface, by means of lines and shades – Notification No. 25/95-Cus. [para 7]
Words and Phrases – 'Design' in popular parlance is used as a synonym with plan or 'figure' and includes a sketch – Design has within its ambit many facets including a criminal design which connotes on civil desire – Notification No. 25/95-Cus. [para 8]
Words and Phrases – 'Book' in common acceptance is a literary composition from which one may extend to advance his or her knowledge and learning – SI. No. 10 of Notification No. 25/95-Cus. [para 17]
Words and Phrases – Word 'Manual' means and implies a small book for han

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.C. 338 = 1985 (11) TMI 1 – SUPREME COURT relied -Interpretation of Tribunal in Tractors and Farms Equipment Ltd.. 1993 (681 E.L.T. 234 (T) = 1993 (7) TMI 182 – CEGAT, NEW DELHI not a correct statement of law – The materials that were imported were contained in 97 volumes. Each volume was a collection of sheet paper containing printed matters. They were fairly securely fastened together at one end. They were protected by two covers also. It certainly looked like a book as well. Each volume if seen by a common man, he will treat it as a book, because each looks like a book. Even though the contents may not be of use to people at large as an ordinary book available in the market, it still continues to be a book. We hold that the understanding of the word 'book' made by the High Court of Gujarat and Supreme Court must govern the issue before us. Accordingly, it is held that the materials imported by the appellants were books and books only. Clause 3 (a) of the Rules states that when goods

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

they should get their full meaning untrammelled by the word which precedes or succeeds, [para 10]
Precedent Judgment under one statute – Printed Books – The plea that decision of the High Court and Supreme Court regarding “book” rendered under Income Tax Act cannot be of any assistance in dealing with the issue under Customs Act not acceptable particularly when the word “book” has not been defined in the Customs Act. 1962 – [1999 (112) E.L.T. 353 S.C.] = 1999 (8) TMI 920 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA relied. – A book, as understood by a common man, cannot change its character depending on the different statutes under which they are dealt with. This is more so when it is seen that the word 'book' has not been defined under Customs Act, 1962.
 
They submitted that as per the ratio of the above circulars/ judgments, the concept of principal supply for the purpose of Section 2(90) of the CGST Act, 2017 had to be decided and thereby the principal supply was supply of goods only and had n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

custom duty as importation of goods and not as importation of service. This also support applicants contention made in the application.
3.9 They submitted that based on the above the products merit classification under the category of supply of goods only.
3.10 They submitted that that applicant have been granted zero rated EPCG license whereby the applicant is supplying printed leaflets to SEZ units and EOU and fulfilling their export obligation by way of supply of goods under deemed export scheme. As per the EPCG license the applicant need to fulfill the export obligation by delivering the goods falling under 4901. SEZ and custom portal do not support service code dropped down for making GRN and lodging the Bill of Entry (BOE). Under no circumstances the impugned goods falls under the category of supply of service but the government was also needed to clarify as to how export obligation be fulfilled in the event of classification held under the category of services.
3.11. They fin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he content to be printed. Further, as per the Customs Tariff Act, applicable to GST, the items in question are classified as goods in the Customs Tariff Act.
The supply in question will therefore, not fall under the SAC 9988 or SAC 998912 and will only be considered as supply of goods. This is also applicable as per the CBEC Circular dtd 24.10.2017. He also made further written submission and provided the copies of various case laws in their defense. He finally requested that the product in question may be considered as supply of goods only & not as service.
5. Discussion and Findings
In the present case we, the members of Advance Ruling, have to decide as to whether the goods/service (under question) has to be considered as supply of goods falling under Chapter Sub-heading No.4901 or as a supply of service falling under SAC No.9989.
5.1 To decide the issue, it is in the interest of justice to discuss the nature of product in question and its use. As per the evidence available befo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the said supply is a mixed supply as per Section 2(74) of the CGST Act, 2017 and in the mixed supply dominance is the message printed on the pamphlet. We further note that the applicant have referred a Circular issued by the All India Federation of Master Printers to its member dtd 08.08.2017 interpreting the correct classification of the product which are as under-
” When the printing units are using content given by the customers, according to the department, they are prima facie engaged in producing customized printed materials and would be treated under “Supply of service' ….
5.3 We note from the said Pamplets/leaflets referred in the above para that the said pamplets have been printed to give the understanding of specific medicine. In normal parlance it is mandatory in the part of manufacturer of P.P.Medicaments to give the details of the product alog with actual product. This details is supplied in order to make aware the consumer about the contents, uses and side effects e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ests have been received to clarify whether supply of books, pamphlets, brochures, envelopes, annual reports, leaflets, cartons, boxes etc., printed with design, logo, name, address or other contents supplied by the recipient of such supplies, would constitute supply of goods falling under Chapter 48 or 49 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51of 1975) or supply of services falling under heading 9989 of the scheme of classification of services annexed to notification No. 11/2017-CT(R).
2. In the above context, it is clarified that supply of books, pamphlets, brochures, envelopes, annual reports, leaflets, cartons, boxes etc. printed with logo, design, name, address or other contents supplied by the recipient of such printed goods, are composite supplies and the question, whether such supplies constitute supply of goods or services would be determined on the basis of what constitutes the principal supply.
3. Principal supply has been defined in Section 2(90) of the C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he printer, predominant supply is that of goods and the supply of printing of the content [supplied by the recipient of supply] is ancillary to the principal supply of goods and therefore such supplies would constitute supply of goods falling under respective headings of under Chapter 48 or 49 of the Customs Tariff.
4. Difficulty if any, in the implementation of the circular should be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version would follow.
Yours Faithfully,
Rachna
Technical Officer (TRU)
Email: rachna.irs@gov.in
5.4.1 We note that the Para 4 of the said Circular specifically clarifies that in the case of printing of books, pamphlets, brochures, annual reports, and the like, where only content is supplied by the publisher or the person who owns the usage rights to the intangible inputs while the physical inputs including paper used for printing belong to the printer, supply of printing [of the content supplied by the recipient of supply] is the principal supply and theref

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Dhiren Chemical Industries 2002 (139) E.L.T. 3 (S.C). = 2001 (12) TMI 3 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Relevant extract of the judgment is reproduced below:
“9. We need to made it clear that, regardless of the interpretation that we have placed on the said phrase, if there are circulars which have been issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs which place a different interpretation upon the said phrase, that interpretation will be binding upon the Revenue.”
5.5.2 Further in the case of Madras Steel Re-Rollers Association 2012(278) ELT 584 (SC), = 2012 (8) TMI 788 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as under:
“7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and relying on the aforesaid decision of this Court, we hold that the Assessing Authorities as well as the Appellate and the Revisional Authorities are creatures of the Act and they perform the functions of the Quasi-judicial Authorities and the orde

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

A decision Vs Binding nature of board circulars. the Circular No. 1006/13/2015-CX dated 21.09.2015 is issued in the context of decision of Apex Court in the case of Ratan Melting & Wire Industries, the decision although rules out that circulars contrary to the statutory provisions of law are not binding even on the departmental officers from the date of judgment but at the same time this decision also pronounces that even the revenue department has right to appeal against the clarifications issued by a board circular. This leads that the board circulars are binding on the revenue authorities till the provisions of the circular are not proved contrary to law by High Court or Supreme Court.
5.6 The applicant relied upon the Circular No. 1052/1/2017-CX, dtd 23.02.2017 to support their claim, However, on going through the contents of the said Circular it is noted that the referred Circular belong to pre GST era, hence, not applicable in the GST cases. Similarly, it is further noted that t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sandeep Textiles Versus The Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST)

Sandeep Textiles Versus The Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST)
GST
2018 (9) TMI 682 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – TMI
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 28-5-2018
S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7326/2018
GST
Ms. Nirmaljit Kaur J.
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ruchir Baheti, authorised representative of Sandeep Textiles, present in person
JUDGMENT/ORDER
Mr. Ruchir Baheti, Chartered Accountant is present in the Court and states that he is authorized to appea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

EXPLANATION REGARDING 2ND PROVISO OF SEC. 54(3) OF UPSGST ACT 2017.

EXPLANATION REGARDING 2ND PROVISO OF SEC. 54(3) OF UPSGST ACT 2017.
Circular No. 1819013/238 Dated:- 28-5-2018 Uttar Pradesh SGST
GST – States
=============
Document 1
पत्राà¤â€šà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Æâ€™: à¤Å“à¥â‚¬.एस.टà¥â‚¬./2018-19/ 1819013 /
समस्त à¤Å“à¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â² एडà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â² à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â°,
समस्त à¤Å“्वाà¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â° (à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â²Ã Â¤â€¢),
समस्त à¤Å“्वाà¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â° (à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€°Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤ÂªÃ Â¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Å¸ सर्à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â²),
समस्त à¤Å“्वाà¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â° (टà¥Ë†à¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¸Ã Â¥â‚¬. à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â­Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤â€” )
लà¤â€“नऊà¤Æâ€™: दिनाà¤â€šà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Æâ€™ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥Ë†à¤², 2018
28-5-2018
विषय:- à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â° प्रदà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¶ माल à¤â€Ã Â¤Â° सà¥â€¡Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤Â¾ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â° à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â®, 2017 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬ धारा – 54 (3) à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ तà¥Æâ€™Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¯ परन्तुà¤â€¢ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ हिन्दà¥â‚¬ एवà¤â€š à¤â€¦Ã Â¤â€šà¤â€”्रà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Å“à¥â‚¬
सà¤â€šà¤¸à¥à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â£ मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š भिन्नता à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ सम्बन्ध मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š स्पष्टà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â£ |
à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â° प्रदà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¶ à

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

 Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¯ परन्तुà¤â€¢
निम्नवत् हà¥Ë†–
“परन्तु यह भà¥â‚¬ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿ à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â° प्रत्यय à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥â‚¬ प्रतिदाय à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å“्ञात नहà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤Å“ायà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€”ा, यदि मालà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š या
सà¥â€¡Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤â€œà¤â€š या दà¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾ पà¥â€šà¤°à¥à¤¤à¤¿à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â° à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¦Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¯ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â° à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ सम्बन्ध मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š शुल्à¤â€¢ वापसà¥â‚¬ लà¥â€¡Ã Â

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¹à¥Ë† । हà¥Ë†à¤£à¥à¤¡à¥â‚¬Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â«Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ एसà¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â¸Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¶Ã Â¤Â¨ à¤â€ Ã Â¤â€”रा द्वारा मुà¤â€“्यालय à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ सà¤â€šà¤Å“्ञान मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š यह तथ्य लाया à¤â€”या
हà¥Ë† à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿ à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¸ भिन्नता à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â£ Duty drawback प्राप्त à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥â€¡ वालà¥â€¡ निर्यातà¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ एस. à¤Å“à¥â‚¬. एस. टà¥â‚¬. à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¡Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Å¸
à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾ रिफण्ड नहà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤â€š हà¥â€¹ पा रहा Ã

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te tax
shall be available even if the supplier of goods or services or both has availed of
drawback in respect of central tax.”
à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¦Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¯ à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¦ एवà¤â€š सà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¾ शुल्à¤â€¢ बà¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¡ द्वारा à¤Å“ारà¥â‚¬ परिपत्र दिनाà¤â€šà¤â€¢ 15.03.2018 मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¦Ã Â¤â€šà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¤ स्पष्टà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â£ सà¥â€¡ यह
स्वतà¤Æâ€™ स्पष्ट हà¥Ë† à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿ Duty drawback à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾ सम्बन्ध à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¦Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¯ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â° सà¥â€¡ हà¥Ë† तथा à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥â‚¬ à¤â€ Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¥â€šà¤°à¥à¤¤à¤¿à¤â€

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

à¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¾ शुल्à¤â€¢ बà¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¡ द्वारा à¤Å“ारà¥â‚¬ परिपत्र सà¤â€š0- 37 /11 / 2018 à¤Å“à¥â‚¬.एस.टà¥â‚¬. दिनाà¤â€šà¤â€¢ 15.03.2018 मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¦Ã Â¤â€šà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¤
तथ्यà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ प्रसारित à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥â€¡ हुए रिफण्ड प्रà¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ सम्बन्ध मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š तद्नुरà¥â€šà¤ª à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â²Ã Â¤Â¨ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤Å“ानà¥â€¡ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ निर्दà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¶ दियà¥â€¡ à¤â€”यà¥â€¡ हà¥Ë†à¤â€šà¥¤
à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendment in the Notifications of the Government of Nagaland, Finance Department (Revenue Branch), F.No.FIN/REV-3/GST/1/08(Pt-1) “G”, dated the 30th June, 2017 and No. FIN/REV-3/GST/1/08(Pt-1)/44 dated: 26th October, 2017.

Amendment in the Notifications of the Government of Nagaland, Finance Department (Revenue Branch), F.No.FIN/REV-3/GST/1/08(Pt-1) “G”, dated the 30th June, 2017 and No. FIN/REV-3/GST/1/08(Pt-1)/44 dated: 26th October, 2017.
F.NO.FIN/REV-3/GST/1/08 (Pt-1)/161 Dated:- 28-5-2018 Nagaland SGST
GST – States
Nagaland SGST
Nagaland SGST
GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
(REVENUE BRANCH)
F.NO.FIN/REV-3/GST/1/08 (Pt-1)/161
NOTIFICATION
Dated: 28th May, 2018
In exercise of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notified E-way bill applicable from june 1, 2018 for Intra-state movement of goods in state of goa Goods goods and service tax rules, 2017

Notified E-way bill applicable from june 1, 2018 for Intra-state movement of goods in state of goa Goods goods and service tax rules, 2017
CCT/26-2/2018-19/36 Dated:- 28-5-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Goa SGST
Goa SGST
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Finance
Revenue & Control Division
NOTIFICATION NO.CCT/26-2/2018-19/36
DATED 28-5-2018
Vide Notification No. CCT/26-2/2017-18/31/6132 dated 29th March, 2018, the "Intra-State" movement of goods was exempted from the provisions of the E-Way Bill up to 31-05-2018.
The Goods and Service Tax Council, has, in its 27th meeting held on 04-05-2018, decided to implement the provisions of the E-Way Bill for "Intra-State" movement of goods w.e.f. 1-6-2018.
In partia

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al and Scrap thereof.
3. All types of Wall and Flooring Tiles.
4. Processed Tobacco and Products thereof.
5. Cigarette, Gutkha and Pan Masala.
6. All types of Plywood, Block Board, Decorative and Laminated Sheets.
7. Coal including Coke in all its forms.
8. Timber and Timber products.
9. Cement and all types of Cement products.
10. Marble and Granite.
11. Kota Stones.
12. Naphtha.
13. FMCG.
14. Namkins & Sweetmeats.
15. I.T. products.
16. Electronic Goods.
17. Pipes & Fittings of all kinds.
18. Plumbing & Sanitary items.
19. Cashew Nuts.
20. Electrical Goods.
21. Readymade Garments.
22. Furniture of all kinds.
In cases of goods which are exempted from carrying E-Way Bill, then the person-in-charge of the conveyance is r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notified Authority To Conduct Examination Of Gst Practitioners.

Notified Authority To Conduct Examination Of Gst Practitioners.
24/2018-STATE TAX Dated:- 28-5-2018 Chhattisgarh SGST
GST – States
Chhattisgarh SGST
Chhattisgarh SGST
Government of Chhattisgarh
Commercial Tax Department
Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur
NOTIFICATION NO.24/2018-STATE TAX
[NO.F-10-25/2018/CT/V (39)]
DATED 28-5-2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 48 of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (7 of 2017) read with sub-rule (3)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notified Authority For Conducting Examination Of Gst Practitioners.

Notified Authority For Conducting Examination Of Gst Practitioners.
8098-8102/CT.[Pol-41/1/2017 Dated:- 28-5-2018 Orissa SGST
GST – States
Orissa SGST
Orissa SGST
ODISHA GOVERNMENT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION NOS.8098-8102/CT.[Pol-41/1/2017
The 28th May, 2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 48 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Odisha Act 7 of 2017) read with sub-rule (3) of rule 83 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the 'Comm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =