Introduction of “Pending” Option for Credit Notes and declaration of Reversal amount in IMS

Introduction of “Pending” Option for Credit Notes and declaration of Reversal amount in IMS GSTDated:- 18-10-2025A new facility in the Invoice Management System (IMS) has been recently introduced on the GST portal wherein the taxpayers are allowed to keep

Introduction of “Pending” Option for Credit Notes and declaration of Reversal amount in IMS
GST
Dated:- 18-10-2025

A new facility in the Invoice Management System (IMS) has been recently introduced on the GST portal wherein the taxpayers are allowed to keep credit notes as “Pending” for one tax period. Further, the IMS functionality have also been enhanced providing a flexibility to the taxpayers to modify their ITC reversal on acceptance of such credit notes thereby resolving many business disputes.
 FAQ on New Changes in Invoice Management System (IMS) from October 2025 Tax Period
 1
For which documents, pending option has been provided now which was not allowed earlier?
Pending option has also been provided for the following documents.
a. Credit notes, or upward amendment of Credit note,
b. Downward amendment of CN where original CN was rejected,
c. Downward amendment of Invoice / DN only where original Invoice already accepted and 3B has been

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1. CN dated 15 Sept 2025, reported in GSTR-1 of Sept 2025 filed on 11 Oct 2025 → Appears in IMS but without Pending Option/new facility.
2. CN dated 15 Oct 2025, reported in GSTR-1 of Oct 2025 on 15th Oct 2025 filed on 11 Nov 2025 → Appears in IMS with Pending Option/new facility at the time of record added in the GSTR 1
3. CN dated 15 Mar 2025, reported in GSTR-1 of Oct 2025 filed on 11 Nov 2025 → Appears in IMS with Pending Option/new facility, since GSTR-2B period is Oct 2025.
4. CN dated 20 Sept 2025, reported in GSTR-1A of Sept 2025 filed on 14 Oct 2025 → Appears in IMS with Pending Option/new facility at the time of adding the record, as its GSTR-2B period is Oct 2025.
4
Till what date can Credit Notes and other specified records be kept pending?
1. For monthly taxpayer(recipient) – 1 tax periods (month)
2. For Quarterly taxpayer(recipient) – 1 tax period (One quarter)
These records are allowed to keep pending as per formula below –
Due date of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

i.e. one Quarter
* Next tax period following the GSTR 2B period is Oct-Dec 2025 + 1 Quarter = Jan-March 2026
Therefore, last date to keep the record as pending i.e. due date of GSTR 3B for Jan-March 2026= 22nd/24th April 2026
5
What will happen after the expiry of allowed period for keeping the record as pending
Pending action will be disabled after specified period. Hence, recipient has to accept or reject that record after the expiry of specified time period. If no action is taken then system will consider such record as deemed accepted.
6
Will the taxpayer get any option to declare the amount of ITC which need to be reversed?
 
Currently the system reverses the entire ITC amount in GSTR-2B of a taxpayer on acceptance of Credit note and similar records even if the taxpayer has not availed the ITC of the corresponding invoice or has reversed certain amount (partial reversal) in GSTR-3B as there are no option to declare the value of ITC need to be reversed on accept

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s Yes, then the recipient will get an option to declare the amount of ITC which need to be reversed for the selected record. This declaration of value is OPTIONAL for taxpayers and the value should be provided by the taxpayer in cases of partial reversal is required.
In case where recipient require to reverse full ITC then recipient taxpayer will proceed by selecting the option YES and without declaring any value. In this case, recipient's ITC will be reduced based on the full values of such record.
Based on the above, ITC will be calculated in GSTR-2B of recipient taxpayer and will be populated in GSTR-3B.
7
Can I save the remark at the time of taking Reject/ Pending action.
Yes, at the time of taking Reject and Pending action on any of the record, taxpayer will get the option to save the remark. In case of Partial and no reversal remarks will be mandatory.
Thanking You,
Team GSTN
=============
Document 1
GIN GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK (A Government Enterprise)
Record

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Traders in Jharkhand see brisk sales on Dhanteras festival, amid GST cuts

Traders in Jharkhand see brisk sales on Dhanteras festival, amid GST cutsGSTDated:- 18-10-2025PTIRanchi, Oct 18 (PTI) Markets in Jharkhand are poised for brisk sales on the occasion of the Dhanteras festival on Saturday, amid the recent cuts in GST rates,

Traders in Jharkhand see brisk sales on Dhanteras festival, amid GST cuts
GST
Dated:- 18-10-2025
PTI
Ranchi, Oct 18 (PTI) Markets in Jharkhand are poised for brisk sales on the occasion of the Dhanteras festival on Saturday, amid the recent cuts in GST rates, traders said.
Sellers of automobiles, electronics and home appliances are betting big on the positive sentiment of consumers during the festival season, while jewellers are sceptical about sales due to skyrocketing gold prices, they said.
Federation of Jharkhand Chamber of Commerce and Industries (FJCCI) president Aditya Malhotra told PTI, “The recent cuts in Goods and Services Tax (GST) have given a boost to the market on Dhanteras this year, particularly in sectors of a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e flocking to the markets on Dhanteras, which will give a boost to small businesses.
The federation has urged the trading community to pass on the benefits of GST rate cuts to the consumers and introduce offers to attract customers, Malhotra said.
The GST Council, comprising the Centre and states, had reduced tax rates on about 375 goods and services from September 22.
The council approved simplifying GST from the four slabs to a two-rate structure – 5 and 18 per cent.
According to automobile dealers, there is pre-booking for around 5,000 two-wheelers and 2,000 four-wheelers only in Ranchi.
“The demand for SUVs is high. Besides, there is a huge surge in demand for electric vehicles, mainly the two-wheeler,” a trader said.
Malhotra sai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petitioner denied bail under s.132(1) CGST Act for alleged Rs.19.76 crore ineligible ITC; remanded due to probe risks

Petitioner denied bail under s.132(1) CGST Act for alleged Rs.19.76 crore ineligible ITC; remanded due to probe risksCase-LawsGSTThe HC dismissed the petition for bail and remanded the petitioner in custody. The court held there existed reasonable grounds

Petitioner denied bail under s.132(1) CGST Act for alleged Rs.19.76 crore ineligible ITC; remanded due to probe risks
Case-Laws
GST
The HC dismissed the petition for bail and remanded the petitioner in custody. The court held there existed reasonable grounds to believe the petitioner committed offences under s.132(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, for wrongfully availing and passing on ineligible ITC totalling Rs. 19.76 crores, exceeding the statutory threshold. A clerical error in the arrest a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Mandamus denied to force petrol and diesel into GST; setting effective date is GST Council policy under Article 279A

Mandamus denied to force petrol and diesel into GST; setting effective date is GST Council policy under Article 279ACase-LawsGSTThe HC dismissed writ petitions seeking mandamus to compel inclusion of petrol and diesel within the GST regime, holding that f

Mandamus denied to force petrol and diesel into GST; setting effective date is GST Council policy under Article 279A
Case-Laws
GST
The HC dismissed writ petitions seeking mandamus to compel inclusion of petrol and diesel within the GST regime, holding that fixation of an effective date is a policy decision vested in the GST Council and not a justiciable right of citizens. The court ruled it lacked jurisdiction to direct the Council to set a date, as no statutory or constitutional right

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Writ dismissed for procedural compliance; adjournment refused, no natural justice breach; appeal permitted with Section 107(1)/107(4) pre-deposit

Writ dismissed for procedural compliance; adjournment refused, no natural justice breach; appeal permitted with Section 107(1)/107(4) pre-depositCase-LawsGSTThe HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that the adjudicating officer complied with procedural

Writ dismissed for procedural compliance; adjournment refused, no natural justice breach; appeal permitted with Section 107(1)/107(4) pre-deposit
Case-Laws
GST
The HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that the adjudicating officer complied with procedural requirements under the TGST Act: three notices for personal hearing were issued and voluminous documents for FY 2021-22 were served, yet the petitioner neither availed the hearings nor filed replies; a belated adjournment request on

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Delhi govt's GST refund gift to traders ahead of Diwali; Rs 738 crore disbursed

Delhi govt’s GST refund gift to traders ahead of Diwali; Rs 738 crore disbursedGSTDated:- 17-10-2025PTINew Delhi, Oct 17 (PTI) Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Friday said that her government has so far disbursed Rs 738 crore in goods and services tax (GST)

Delhi govt's GST refund gift to traders ahead of Diwali; Rs 738 crore disbursed
GST
Dated:- 17-10-2025
PTI
New Delhi, Oct 17 (PTI) Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Friday said that her government has so far disbursed Rs 738 crore in goods and services tax (GST) refund to the city traders ahead of Diwali.
The government earlier announced a GST refund of Rs 1,600 crore to city traders, pending since 2019.
The process remains ongoing, with modern technology enabling faster and more eff

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rs 7-crore GST fraud unearthed in UP's Bhadohi; trader booked, firm's registration cancelled

Rs 7-crore GST fraud unearthed in UP’s Bhadohi; trader booked, firm’s registration cancelledGSTDated:- 17-10-2025PTIBhadohi (UP), Oct 17 (PTI) Authorities here have uncovered a major case of Goods and Services Tax (GST) fraud, allegedly causing a revenue

Rs 7-crore GST fraud unearthed in UP's Bhadohi; trader booked, firm's registration cancelled
GST
Dated:- 17-10-2025
PTI
Bhadohi (UP), Oct 17 (PTI) Authorities here have uncovered a major case of Goods and Services Tax (GST) fraud, allegedly causing a revenue loss to the tune of Rs 7 crore to the exchequer, officials said on Friday.
A local trading firm, M/s Pawan Traders, allegedly declared fake sales worth over Rs 55 crore to traders in Bihar and Punjab without supplying any goods or arranging their transportation, they said.
Following an investigation, officials said the registration of the firm has been cancelled.
Deputy Commissioner (State Tax) Manoj Agrawal filed a complaint against the firm's owner, Pawan Kumar Mishra.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

FAQs on GSTR -9/9C for FY 2024-25

FAQs on GSTR -9/9C for FY 2024-25 GSTDated:- 17-10-2025GSTR-9/9C is now available to taxpayers for filing. A list of Frequently Asked Question along with the response has been compiled and is intended to assist the Taxpayer in better understanding of vari

FAQs on GSTR -9/9C for FY 2024-25
GST
Dated:- 17-10-2025

GSTR-9/9C is now available to taxpayers for filing. A list of Frequently Asked Question along with the response has been compiled and is intended to assist the Taxpayer in better understanding of various Tables of GSTR-9/9C and their key aspects – such as reporting of various values in Tables.
S. No.
Query
GSTN Reply
1
When my GSTR 9/9C for FY 2024-25 will be enabled?
Once all the due returns in Form GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B for the FY 2024-25 is filed, GSTR 9/9C for FY 2024-25 will be enabled in the system automatically.
2
If any GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B is pending for the FY 2024-25 then will my GSTR 9 is enabled?
No GSTR 9 will not be enabled where any GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B is pending for the FY 2024-25. All the relevant cells of Table 4,5,6,8 and 9 of GSTR 9 will be auto populated based on the statement / return filed by you i.e. GSTR 1/1A/IFF or GSTR 2B or GSTR 3B.
3
What is table 8A of GSTR 9 and how i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

opulation of value in Table 4/5 of GSTR 9?
Yes, from FY 2024-25 the supplies added / amended through GSTR 1A will also be considered along with GSTR 1 and IFF for the purpose of auto population in Table 4, 5 of GSTR 9.
6
What is table 6A1 and which amount is required to be reported?
Table 6A1 of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25 capture the ITC of preceding FY (2023-24) claimed by the recipient in the current FY (2024-25) till the specified time period and it is also included in Table 6A of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25.
However, any ITC pertaining to FY 2023-24 or any other preceding financial years, which has been reclaimed during current FY (2024-25) on account of rule 37 / 37A will not be reported in Table 6A1 of GSTR 9.
Therefore, the amount calculated in Table 6A2 (6A minus 6A1) is the ITC pertaining to current FY (2024-25) which need to be bifurcated between 6B to 6H. As the ITC of preceding FY (2023-24) has been excluded through Table 6A1 therefore it will not create the difference

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25 as under –
1. Original claim in Table 6B of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25
2. Reversal of same in Table 7A of GSTR 9 for FY 202425
3. Reclaim in Table 6H of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25
Example 2 – Mr A has claimed Rs 100 (IGST) in the month of April 2024 and reversed the same in April 2024 due to nonreceipt of goods as per Circular No. 170/02/2022-GST 6th July 2022. The same has been reclaimed in May 2024 as goods has been received on 4th May 2024. The reporting will be in the GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25 as under –
1. Original claim in Table 6B of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25
2. Reversal of same in Table 7H of GSTR 9 for FY 202425
3. Reclaim in Table 6H of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25
8
How the value of ITC will be reported if ITC pertaining to FY 202324 has been claimed, reversed in FY 202324 and reclaimed in the FY 2024-25?
ITC pertaining to preceding FY (2023-24) which has been claimed / reclaimed in this FY (2024-25) for any reason other than rule 37/37A, should be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC will be reported if ITC pertaining to FY 202425 has been claimed, reversed in FY 202425 and reclaimed in the FY 2025-26?
Table 6A of GSTR 9, is auto populated from Table 4A (1 to 5) of GSTR 3B for entire FY from April 2024 to March 2025. As ITC was claimed and reversed in the FY 2024-25 itself then it will be reported in table 6B and reversal in Table 7 of GSTR 9. In such cases these two events should be reported as below –
* claim should be reported in Table 6B,
* reversal should be reported in Table 7 (Table 7A to 7H, as the case may be).
For the reclaim the procedure will be based on whether reclaim is on account of rule 37/37A or reason otherwise, as below –
* If the ITC which was reclaim in FY 2025-26 is because of other than rule 37/37A à Such reclaim will be reported in Table 13 of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25 and table 6A1 of GSTR 9 of FY 2025-26 (in GSTR 9 of next Year). This will not be reported in Table 6H of GSTR 9 of 2025-26 (in GSTR 9 of next Year).

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

5-26 (in GSTR 9 of next Year).
Example 2 – If any ITC of current FY 2024-25 was claimed and reversed in the FY 2024-25 but reclaimed (due to rule 37/37A) in the next FY 2025-26 then such ITC will be reported in GSTR 9 as under –
1. Original claim shall be reported in Table 6B of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25
2. Reversal of same shall be reported in Table 7A (rule 37) or 7A1 (rule 37A) of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25
3. Reclaim shall not to be reported in table 8C and 13 of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25
4. Reclaim shall be reported in table 6H of GSTR 9 for FY 2025-26 (in GSTR 9 of next Year).
10
Whether there are any changes in the reporting for table 6M as label has been changed from FY 2024-25
No. Label change to Table 6M has aligned it with the instruction of the notified form. As per the Instruction to the notified form the ITC claimed through ITC 01, 02 and 02A should be reported in Table 6M of GSTR 9.
11
What is table 8A excel and where it is available?
To facilitate the ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ecord is ineligible for ITC due to PoS Rule, and it will appear in Table 8A excel (B2B as ITC eligibility Yes and B2BA as ITC eligibility No) but not appear in Table 8A online
4. Outward supplies amended from FY 2024-25 to FY 2025-26 then it will appear in Table 8A excel (B2B sections of excel sheet) but not appear in Table 8A online
5. Outward supplies amended from FY 2025-26 to FY 2024-25 then it will appear in Table 8A excel (B2BA sections of excel sheet) and will appear in Table 8A online
It may be noted that 8A online is correctly populated whereas there are some additional records may present in Table 8A excel on account of above-mentioned points.
13
When any amendment made by my supplier in his GSTR 1/1A/IFF, will the changes be auto populated in my Table 8A (Excel and Online) of GSTR 9?
Yes, any amendment in GSTR 1/1A/IFF the auto population in table 8A will be as per amended record if such amended supplies pertain to FY 2024-25.
 Example 1 – Invoice dat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

th Rs 120(IGST). However, the Table 8A excel will have this record in B2B sections of excel sheet as Rs 100 (IGST) and B2BA sections of excel sheet as Rs 120 (IGST).
Example 3 – Mr A is registered in Maharashtra has issued invoice with IGST to Mr B (registered in Delhi) in the GSTR 1 for January 2025. As this was eligible record for FY 2024-25 hence it will appear in the table 8A (Excel and Online) of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25. Now supplier has amended the place of supply as Maharashtra in the GSTR 1 of Feb 2025 and therefore the CGST and SGST is levied on the record. After amending the place of supply, the amended record becomes ineligible ITC record. As the document belongs to FY 2024-25 so it will appear in Table 8A excel (B2B sections of excel sheet as ITC eligibility Yes and B2BA sections of excel sheet as ITC eligibility No). However, this record will not appear in table 8A Online of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25 as amended record on which ITC is eligible will be considered for the purpos

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nt FY which is availed in next FY within the specified time period. This table shall not include any ITC which was claimed (reported in table 4A of GSTR 3B) and reversed (Reported in 4B of GSTR 3B) in the current FY and reclaimed in next FY till the specified time period.
Hence the Table 8C only contain the missed ITC of current FY (2024-25) which is claimed in GSTR 3B of next FY till the specified time period.
16
Whether table 8C will have the ITC which is claimed and reversed in a FY (2024-25) and reclaimed in next FY (2025-26)
No. In case where the ITC has been claimed and reversed in a FY (2024-25) and reclaimed in 2025-26. Such reclaim ITC should not be reported in the Table 8C of GSTR 9 of FY 202425.
Example – Mr A has claimed the ITC in the month of March 2025 (Table 4A5 of GSTR 3B) and reversed the same in March 2025 (Table 4B2 of GSTR 3B) because the goods has not been reached to its factory. Now in the month of April 2025 the ITC has been reclaimed ((Table 4A5 of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing FY 2024-25 and reported in GSTR 1 furnished between April'25 to October 2025 and hence recipient is availing the corresponding ITC first time in table 4A5 of GSTR 3B of next FY (2025-26) till the specified time period.
Example 1 – Mr A has purchased the goods in the month of January 2025 however he has missed to claim the ITC in the January 2025. Now in the month of May 2025 the ITC has been claimed (Table 4A5 of GSTR 3B). This ITC is pertaining to the FY 2024-25, and which has been claimed first time in next year till the specified time period so it will be reported in the Table 8C and Table 13 of GSTR 9.
Example 2 – Mr A has purchased the goods in the month of January 2025 however supplier has not reported this invoice in GSTR 1 for January 2025. This invoice was added in the GSTR 1 of April 2025 by the supplier which is filed on 11th May 2025. Recipient has claimed the ITC in the GSTR 3B for April 2025 (In table 4A5 of GSTR 3B). This ITC is auto populated in Table 8A of GS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not be reported in the Table 6E of GSTR 9. IGST Paid on import of goods be reported in Table 8G and Amount of ITC Claimed in next FY to be reported in Table 8H1 and therefore the difference in the Table 8I will be NIL.
Also, this ITC will be reported in the Table 13 of GSTR 9 of 24-25.
20
Which value is auto populated in tax payable in Table 9 of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25 as negative liability tables has been inserted in the GSTR 3B?
The Tax payable column is captured from GSTR 3B from net liability. If liability reported in the Table 6.1 of GSTR 3B is positive (Gross minus negative liability) then such positive net tax liability be auto populated in the Table 9 under tax payable. However, if net amount in table 6.1 is appearing in negative then no amount will be auto populated under Tax payable column of Table 9.
Further tax payable column of Table 9 of GSTR 9 is kept editable and therefore taxpayer may change the value, if required.
21
Whether label change to Table 12 an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

R 9 for FY 202425?
From financial year 2024-25, concessional rate of tax of 65% checkbox is removed from the table 17 and 18 of GSTR-9 online as this concessional rate of tax is not applicable currently. Also, in the offline tool such column has been made disabled.
24
How the late fees are calculated in GSTR 9C for FY 2024-25
As clarified vide Circular No. 246/03/2025-GST dated 30th January 2025, the late fee is levied under Section 47(2) of the CGST Act for any delay in furnishing the complete annual return under Section 44. This includes both FORM GSTR-9 and FORM GSTR-9C (if applicable). Accordingly, a new Table – 17 titled “Late Fee Payable and Paid” has been inserted below Part V of GSTR-9C to capture such late fee payable under Section 47(2).
The late fee shall be leviable for the period starting from the due date of furnishing the annual return till the date of filing of GSTR 9 for annual return.
The late fee for GSTR 9C will be calculated from date of filing of G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he ITC which is claimed and reversed due to reason of rule 37 / 37A and subsequently reclaimed in any financial year then such reclaimed ITC will be considered the ITC of that year only (in which it has been reclaimed).
Therefore, it will always report in Table 6H of GSTR 9 to be filed for the FY in which such reclaim has been reported.
Example –
Particular
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Claim – Reversal and reclaim all three are in same FY 24-25) Assume Amount of ITC is Rs 120
Claim and Reversal in FY 24-25; Reclaim in FY 25-26 (Reason other than Rule 37/37A for e.g. Circular No. 170/02/2022-GST 6th July 2022)
Claim and Reversal in FY 24-25; 
Reclaim in FY 25-26 (due to Rule 37/37A for which no time limit to reclaim the ITC 
Originally Claimed 
FY 2024-25
March'25 (FY 2024-25)
April'24 (FY 2024-25)
Reversed –
FY 2024-25
March'25 (FY 2024-25)
October'24 (FY 2024-25)
Reclaimed
FY 2024-25
April'25 (FY

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

120
 
 
 
120
Table 6I Sub total (B to H above)
240
120
0
120
120
Table 6J Difference (I – A2 above)
0
0
0
0
0
Table 7A / 7A1 7A – As per Rule 37 / 7A1 – As per Rule  37A
120
(Report in applicable rows from 7A to 7H
as per the reason of reversal)
 
 
120
 
Table 7H Other reversal 
120
 
 
 
Table 8A ITC as per GSTR2B (table 3 thereof)
120
120
 
120
 
Table 8B ITC as per 6(B) above
120
120
 
120
 
Table 8C [ITC on inward supplies (other than imports and inward supplies liable to reverse charge but includes services received from SEZs) received during the financial year but availed in the next financial year up to specified period
0
0
 
Note 1
 
 
 
Table 8D Difference [A(B+C)]
0
0
 
 
 
Table 12 ITC of the financial year reversed in the next financial year
0
0
&nbs

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)Case-LawsGSTThe HC affirmed the Single Judge’s order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the

Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petition dismissed as not maintainable; held collateral delay attempt, mala fide; petitioner ordered to pay Rs.2,00,000 costs

Petition dismissed as not maintainable; held collateral delay attempt, mala fide; petitioner ordered to pay Rs.2,00,000 costsCase-LawsGSTThe HC dismissed the petition as not maintainable and awarded costs of Rs.2,00,000 payable by the petitioner to the re

Petition dismissed as not maintainable; held collateral delay attempt, mala fide; petitioner ordered to pay Rs.2,00,000 costs
Case-Laws
GST
The HC dismissed the petition as not maintainable and awarded costs of Rs.2,00,000 payable by the petitioner to the respondent within four weeks. The court held the claim for release/provision of originals seized during searches was impermissible because identical relief had already been granted by the Apex Court and there is no allegation of non-co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IGST cannot be separately levied on service element of composite supply when goods component already taxed – show cause quashed

IGST cannot be separately levied on service element of composite supply when goods component already taxed – show cause quashedCase-LawsGSTHC allowed the writ petition and quashed the show cause notice issued by the revenue officer, holding that levy of I

IGST cannot be separately levied on service element of composite supply when goods component already taxed – show cause quashed
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the writ petition and quashed the show cause notice issued by the revenue officer, holding that levy of IGST on a service component is impermissible where IGST has already been concomitantly imposed on the goods component of a composite supply. The HC, following the SC precedent, concluded that a tax treated by legislation as part of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Writ under Article 226 dismissed for excess ITC where suppliers' GSTR-1s not proven and procedural delay found

Writ under Article 226 dismissed for excess ITC where suppliers’ GSTR-1s not proven and procedural delay foundCase-LawsGSTThe HC dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 for excess availment of Input Tax Credit where the petitioner failed to establis

Writ under Article 226 dismissed for excess ITC where suppliers' GSTR-1s not proven and procedural delay found
Case-Laws
GST
The HC dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 for excess availment of Input Tax Credit where the petitioner failed to establish that suppliers filed requisite GSTR-1 for March 2019 and where no procedural infirmity in the impugned demand order was demonstrated. The Court found undue delay in institution and numbering of the petition, noting it was presented

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Quashing consolidated show-cause notices that clubbed multiple years, holding demands must respect Sections 73 and 74 CGST Act.

Quashing consolidated show-cause notices that clubbed multiple years, holding demands must respect Sections 73 and 74 CGST Act.Case-LawsGSTThe HC quashed consolidated show-cause notices issued by Respondent No.2 that clubbed multiple financial years for d

Quashing consolidated show-cause notices that clubbed multiple years, holding demands must respect Sections 73 and 74 CGST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
The HC quashed consolidated show-cause notices issued by Respondent No.2 that clubbed multiple financial years for demand of GST and reversal of alleged ineligible ITC, holding such consolidation to be without jurisdiction and a judicial overreach. The court reaffirmed the statutory limitation scheme under the CGST Act, 2017 – tax periods are tied

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Transactions are composite supply under section 2(30) CGST; principal supply photographic printing services determine tax under section 8

Transactions are composite supply under section 2(30) CGST; principal supply photographic printing services determine tax under section 8Case-LawsGSTThe HC held that the transactions constitute a composite supply under section 2(30) of the CGST Act, with

Transactions are composite supply under section 2(30) CGST; principal supply photographic printing services determine tax under section 8
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that the transactions constitute a composite supply under section 2(30) of the CGST Act, with the predominant element being a supply of services (photographic printing/processing) rather than transfer of goods; title to the digital images remains with the customers and the paper/ink are ancillary. Consequently, tax liability

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Advance ruling application dismissed as inadmissible for non-disclosure and pending investigation on output tax and input credit

Advance ruling application dismissed as inadmissible for non-disclosure and pending investigation on output tax and input creditCase-LawsGSTThe AAR dismissed the applicant’s advance ruling application as inadmissible and rejected it on grounds that an inv

Advance ruling application dismissed as inadmissible for non-disclosure and pending investigation on output tax and input credit
Case-Laws
GST
The AAR dismissed the applicant's advance ruling application as inadmissible and rejected it on grounds that an investigation and antecedent show-cause proceedings by the revenue investigation unit were pending on the same questions, and the applicant failed to disclose issuance of the SCN, amounting to suppression of material facts. Under the st

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

PM Modi lauds Andhra govt, IT Minister Nara Lokesh for GST savings campaign

PM Modi lauds Andhra govt, IT Minister Nara Lokesh for GST savings campaignGSTDated:- 16-10-2025PTIKurnool (Andhra Pradesh), Oct 16 (PTI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday lauded the Andhra Pradesh government and IT Minister Nara Lokesh for the suc

PM Modi lauds Andhra govt, IT Minister Nara Lokesh for GST savings campaign
GST
Dated:- 16-10-2025
PTI
Kurnool (Andhra Pradesh), Oct 16 (PTI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday lauded the Andhra Pradesh government and IT Minister Nara Lokesh for the successful 'Super GST Super Savings' campaign.
The GST Council recently approved a complete overhaul of the goods and services tax regime, slashing tax on several common use items, from hair oil to corn flakes and personal health

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =