Constitute the Odisha State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for Goods and Services Tax.

GST – States – 18768-FIN-CT1-TAX-0072/2017-S.R.O. No. 201/2018 – Dated:- 8-6-2018 – FINANCE DEPARTMENT NOTIFICATION The 8th June, 2018 S.R.O.No.201/2018- In pursuance of Section 99 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Odisha Act 7 of 2017), the State Government do hereby constitute the Odisha State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for Goods and Services Tax, consisting of the Chief Commissioner of central tax as designated by the Board and the Commissioner of State tax, for hea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In order to clarify the Special drive “GST refunds fortnight” from 31st May to 14th June, 2018-reg.

In order to clarify the Special drive GST refunds fortnight from 31st May to 14th June, 2018-reg. – GST – States – No. 01/GST/2018-19 – Dated:- 8-6-2018 – GOVTERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI DEPARTMENT OF TRADEAND TAXES (HUMAN RESOURCE BRANCH) VYAPAR BHAWAN, I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002. ORDER No. F.3(174)/Policy-GST/2018/262-74 Dated: 08-06-2018 Trade Notice No. 01/GST/2018-19 Subject: Special drive "GST refunds fortnight" from 31st May to 14th June, 2018-reg. All the exporters/dealers & Trade Associations are informed that DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & TAXES Govt. of NCT of Delhi is observing a special drive-GST refunds fortnight from 31st May to 14th June, 2018 to intensify the efforts to liquidate all pending r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ately with Central and State for refund of CGST and SGST respectively. • It is not enough to file FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal. Your refund Claim will not be processed until you submit a printout of the form to the jurisdictional tax office. 3. All the officers concerned in the DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & TAXES will deal with cases of GST related refund claims and process them on utmost priority basis. The taxpayers are advised to contact respective ward officers in connection with the refund claims or for any help in this regard. 4. In case any difficulty is faced with regard to the sanction of the refund claims, Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari. Additional Commissioner, 5th Floor, Vyapar Bhawan, IP Estate, New Delhi- 110002 may be cont

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Gati-Kintetsu Express Private Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Kharagpur Range & Others

2018 (6) TMI 558 – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 18 (Cal.) , [2018] 2 GSTL 132 (Cal) – Appealable Order or not? – seizure of vehicle passed by the authorities exercising jurisdiction under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Section 107 of the Act – Held that:- Section 107 of the Act allows any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under the Act of 2017 or the State Goods and Services Tax Act to file an appeal before the appellate authority as may be prescribed. It appears that, the State has prescribed the appellate authority who is the senior Joint Commissioner (Appeals) as the appellate authority – Section 121 is an exception to Section 107 of the Act. While Section 107 of the Act makes every decision or order passed under the Act of 2017 to be appealable, Section 121 makes an exception thereto and states that, few which are recognized in Sub-section (a) to (d) would not be appealable.

The petitioner has a statutory altern

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of such Section. Therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable. In support of such contention he relies upon a judgment and order dated February 1, 2018 passed Writ Tax No.111 of 2018 (M/s. R.K. Overseas – Versus- Union of India & Ors.) by the Allahabad High court. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents submits that, the writ petitioner proceeds on the basis of that the appellant authority has not been constituted. He submits on instructions that, appellate authority has since been constituted. He refers to Section 121 of the Act of 2017 and submits that, the exception is in relation to books of accounts, registers and other documents that may be seized and retained by the authorities. An order of seizure or retention of books of account, register and other documents may not be appealable. In such circumstances, he submits that, the writ petitioner should be required to prefer the statutory appeal. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that, the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

llip;………………………………………….. Section 107 of the Act of 2017 allows any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under the Act of 2017 or the State Goods and Services Tax Act to file an appeal before the appellate authority as may be prescribed. It appears that, the State has prescribed the appellate authority who is the senior Joint Commissioner (Appeals) as the appellate authority. Section 121 of the Act of 2017 craves out an exception to the appellate orders and decisions. It is as follows :- 121. Non-appealable decisions and orders. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any provisions of this Act, no appeal shall lie against any decision taken or order passed by an officer of State tax if such decision taken or order passed relates to any one or more of the following matters, namely :- (a) an order of the Commissioner or other authority empowered to direct transfe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the seizure relates to an immovable property or any other object, apart from books of account, register and other documents would become appealable. That in my view, is not what Sub-section (b) of Section 121 specifies. Consequently, I am unable to concur with the view expressed in M/s. R K Overseas (Supra). The petitioner has a statutory alternative remedy available. It would be appropriate to permit the petitioner to prefer an appeal from the impugned order before the designated appellate authority, either electronically or otherwise, in terms of Rule 109 of the West Bengal Goods and Serves Tax Act, 2017. In the event, such appeal is filed within a period of ten days from date, the appellate authority will treat the same to be within the time period stipulated for the purpose of preferring an appeal and, will proceed to hear such appeal and dispose of the same, in accordance with law. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents submits that, an order of impositi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD. Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM, STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE GOOD & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE OF K

M/s. BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD. Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM, STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE GOOD & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE OF KERALA TAXES DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT AND GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI – 2018 (6) TMI 557 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI – Release of detained goods – Section 129 of the CGST Act as also the Kerala SGST Act – Held that:- An identical matter has been disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court in THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND THE INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR VERSUS MADHU. M.B. [2017 (9) TMI 1044 – KERALA HIGH COURT], directing expeditious completion o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the matter and permitting release of the goods detained pending adjudication, in terms of Rule 140(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. In the light of the decision of the Division Bench in W.A.No.1802 of 2017, the writ petition is disposed of directing the competent authority to complete the adjudication provided for under Section 129 of the statutes referred to above, within a week from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is also directed that if the petitioner complies with Rule 140(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the goods detained shall be released to them forthwith. – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements – Orders – Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmana

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarifications of certain issues under GST– regarding

Goods and Services Tax – 47/21/2018 – Dated:- 8-6-2018 – Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST F. No. CBEC- 20/16/03/2017-GST Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs GST Policy Wing New Delhi, Dated the 08th June, 2018 To, The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All)/ The Principal Directors General/ Directors General (All) Madam/Sir, Subject: Clarifications of certain issues under GST- regarding Representations have been received seeking clarification on certain issues under the GST laws. The same have been examined and the clarifications on the same are as below: Sl. No. Issue Clarification 1 Whether moulds and dies owned by Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) that are sent free of cost (FOC) to a component manufacturer is leviable to tax and whether OEMs are required to reverse input tax credit in this case? 1.1 Moulds and dies owned by the original equip

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent manufacturer was for supply of components made by using the moulds/dies belonging to the component manufacturer, but the same have been supplied by the OEM to the component manufacturer on FOC basis, the amortised cost of such moulds/dies shall be added to the value of the components. In such cases, the OEM will be required to reverse the credit availed on such moulds/ dies, as the same will not be considered to be provided by OEM to the component manufacturer in the course or furtherance of the former s business. 2 How is servicing of cars involving both supply of goods (spare parts) and services (labour), where the value of goods and services are shown separately, to be treated under GST? 2.1 The taxability of supply would have to be determined on a case to case basis looking at the facts and circumstances of each case. 2.2 Where a supply involves supply of both goods and services and the value of such goods and services supplied are shown separately, the goods and services would

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

purpose of auction of tea, coffee, rubber etc., or the principal and the auctioneer for the purpose of supply of tea through a private treaty, are required to maintain the books of accounts relating to each and every place of business in that place itself in terms of the first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 35 of the CGST Act. However, in case difficulties are faced in maintaining the books of accounts, it is clarified that they may maintain the books of accounts relating to the additional place(s) of business at their principal place of business instead of such additional place(s). (c) The principal and the auctioneer for the purpose of auction of tea, coffee, rubber etc., or the principal and the auctioneer for the purpose of supply of tea through a private treaty, shall intimate their jurisdictional officer in writing about the maintenance of books of accounts relating to the additional place(s) of business at their principal place of business. 3.2 It is further clarified tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gst rate and credit eligibility

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Ramakrishnan Seshadri – Dated:- 7-6-2018 Last Replied Date:- 9-6-2018 – Dear Sir,We kindly request the experts to answer my query.Our Directors went to hyderabad and stayed in hotel for business purpose. The hotel has charged 18% igst in their bill by mentioning our GSTIN. in tamilnadu.Whether credit is eligible or not and it is correct or not.Another question is our directors stayed in telengana and do work in andhra pradesh. The telengana hotel has charged 9% cgst and 9% sgst in their invoice. whether it is correct .Pleae confirm the experts our queryThanks & Regards,S.Ramakrishnan – Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan – The Reply = Sir, As per Section 12 (3) of IGST Act, 2017 The place of supply o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not available to you located in Tamilnadu since such credit can be utilised within the state in which the service provider has gst registration. – Reply By Ramaswamy S – The Reply = Endorse the views.RegardsS.Ramaswamy – Reply By YAGAY and SUN – The Reply = In case you have branch over there then you may get ITC if you get such bills at your branch offices. – Reply By Praveen Nair – The Reply = Dear Experts As per the Section 12(3), all billing by Hotel (within the taxable territory) is subject to CGST & SGST. What are the cases where hotel can charge IGST? In view of the above query, from the Hyderabad hotel point of view, will they be asked to pay the GST again (CGST & SGST), since wrongly paid as IGST? Since the customer is unawa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR-1. B2B invoice addition

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Nikhil Oltikar – Dated:- 7-6-2018 Last Replied Date:- 8-6-2018 – Can the Total invoice value of the B2B invoice in GSTR-1 be lesser than the taxable value of the invoice? – Reply By YAGAY and SUN – The Reply = In our view it cannot be. – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = I concur with the views of M/s.YAGAY and SUN, Sirs. Total invoice value includes the element of tax also. Moreover, invoice value includes the value of exempt/nil/zero rated also. Hence

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RCM on registered GTA

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – kaushal jaishwal – Dated:- 7-6-2018 Last Replied Date:- 8-6-2018 – Dear sir/mamwe are a pvt ltd. co. , if a registered GTA providing GTA service and no GST have been charged in bill but it is already registered in GST.please advise whether the company is still liable under RCM to pay GST on registered GTA' bill if they are not charging GST on thier bill. – Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan – The Reply = Sir, As per Sl. No. 1 of Notification No. 13/2017=Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 as amended Supply of Services by a goods transport agency (GTA) who has not paid central tax at the rate of 6% in respect of transportation of goods by road to- (a) any factory registered under or governed by the Fa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

LIQUOR LICENSE LEASING AS IMMOVABLE PROPERTY?

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal – Dated:- 7-6-2018 – Liquor manufacture in India is very complicated with very few cases where brand owner, distiller and bottler are the same entity. Since license for distilleries are highly regulated by the State, brand owners get the liquor manufactured / bottled through on license lease basis which could be either by leasing of the distillery or factory (immovable property) itself or leasing of liquor license. Such liquor licensing is regulated by state excise laws and liquor manufacturing rules as made applicable to the State. When we talk of renting or leasing services, we find that renting of immovable property is a taxable event and such renting or leasing of factory, plant e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cense of potable liquor and rectified spirits, revenue department wanted that factory leasing and license leasing should not be delinked and sought to tax both as renting of immovable property service, the tribunal (Cestat, Mumbai) ruled in favour of the assessee and against the department. The appellants were engaged in the business of manufacturing and bottling of alcoholic beverages. The appellants held Potable Liquor License (PLL) and Rectified Sprit License (RSII). The appellants entered into an agreement under which the appellants leased their licenses. The appellants thereafter entered into an agreement for bottling at their plant and recovered bottling charges for the same. Revenue's argument was that there cannot be a license w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

icensed and no charges in the license premises could be made by the licensor without the permission. It was further held that though license is granted in respect of manufactory but the same is granted to the person. The license given to a person in respect of a manufactory can be transferred to another manufactory on another site in the name of same person. License can be granted even before the manufactory comes into existence. From the Rules it was apparent that license by itself is not a immovable property and therefore leasing of license could not be treated as renting of immovable property service. It thus concluded that license by itself is not immovable property and therefore, leasing of license can not be treated as renting of immo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on export of Goods – Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and Clarification in other cases

Customs – PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 24/2018 – Dated:- 7-6-2018 – OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS CUSTOM HOUSE: PORT AREA: VISAKHAPATNAM – 530 035 F. No. P3/06/2017-Stats (AM) Date: 07.06.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 24/2018 Sub : Reg. Attention of all exporters, customs brokers, members of general trade, and all other stakeholders is invited to refer this office s Public Notice Nos. 09/2018 dated 26.02.2018 and 15/2018 dated 25.03.2018 wherein an alternative mechanism with officer interface to resolve invoice mismatches was provided for the shipping bills filed till 28.02.2018. [Board s Circular No. 05/2018-Customs dated 23.02.2018 and Circular No. 08/2018-Cus. Dated 23.03.2018 refers.] 2. Although the cases having SB005 error have now

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

atch between GSTIN entity mentioned in the Shipping bill and the one filing GSTR-1/GSTR-3B. Board has examined the issue and it has been decided to provide a correction facility in cases where although GSTIN of both the entities are different but PAN is same. This happens mostly in cases where an entity filing Shipping bill is a registered office and the entity which has paid the IGST is manufacturing unit/other office or vice versa. However, in all such cases, entity claiming refund (one which has filed the Shipping bill) will give an undertaking to the effect that its other office (one which has paid IGST) shall not claim any refund or any benefit of the amount of IGST so paid. The undertaking shall be signed by authorized persons of both

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on export of Goods-Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and clarification in other cases

Customs – PUBLIC NOTICE No. 88/2018 – Dated:- 7-6-2018 – OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT) NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI – 400 001. F. No. S/26-Misc-05/2018 IGST Date: 07.06.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE No. 88/2018 Subject: reg. Attention of the Exporter, Customs Broker and Traders is invited to board s Circular no. 15/2018-Customs issued vide F. No. 450/119/2017-Cus IV dated 6th June 2018. 2. CBIC has issued Circular No s 05/2018-Customs dated 23.02.2018 and 08/2018-Customs dated 23.03.2018 wherein an alternative mechanism with officer interface to resolve invoice mismatches was provided for the shipping bills filed till 28.02.2018. Although the cases having SB005 error have now ebbed due to continuous outreach done by the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR-3B. Board has examined the issue and it has been decided to provide a correction facility in cases where although GSTIN of both the entities are different but PAN is same. This happens mostly in cases where an entity filing Shipping bill is a registered office and the entity which has paid the IGST is manufacturing unit/other office or vice versa. However, in all such cases, entity claiming refund (one which has filed the Shipping bill) will give an undertaking to the effect that its other office (one which has paid IGST) shall not claim any refund or any benefit of the amount of IGST so paid. The undertaking shall be signed by authorized persons of both the entities. This undertaking has to be submitted to the Customs Officer at the p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Neeraj Jain Versus Union of India

2018 (11) TMI 707 – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 131 (Cal) – Enlargement on Bail – Section 132(1)(a),(b) and (c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Held that:- The authority of the opposite party will take endeavour to record or to interrogate the accused/petitioner in custody in the correction home as per the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate by recording his statement. So, this application is kept pending as deferred in the next week. – CRM 3328 of 2018 Dated:- 7-6-2018 – Shivakant Prasad, J. Mr. Debasish Roy, Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar, Mr. Danish Haque, Mr. Arindam Dey, Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Ms. Aroshi Rathore, Ms. Kriti Mehorotra, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.K.Maity, for the opposite party

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Accent Pharma Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Pondicherry

2018 (8) TMI 1498 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – CENVAT credit – input service – business development services – Held that:- The period involved is prior to 01.04.2011 when the definition of input service included the words ‘activities relating to business’ – denial of credit unjustified.

Penalty u/r 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 – Held that:- Since the major credit of business development service has been set aside, the penalty is also unwarranted and requires to be set aside.

Appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal No. E/42331/2017 – Final Order No. 41743/2018 – Dated:- 7-6-2018 – Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) Ms. Yogalakshmi, Advocate for the Appellant Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Res

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e, 2010 to August, 2010 and, therefore, the said services are covered within the definition of input service as it stood during the relevant period. She relied upon the decision in the case of FLOWSERVE SANMAR LTD. Vs. CCE Chennai, 2017 (5) G.S.T.L. 375 (Tribunal – Chennai). 3. The learned AR, Shri R. Subramaniyan, supported the findings in the impugned order. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The learned Counsel has submitted that though various services have been denied credit, as per the impugned order, they are confining their contest only on the credit only in respect of business development services. The period involved is prior to 01.04.2011 when the definition of input service included the words activities relating to business . The decision

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Indian Additives Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai North

2018 (8) TMI 1497 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – Liability of Interest and penalty – On being pointed out about the mistake, the credit, having been reversed before utilization – Held that:- The appellant has reversed a substantial portion of the irregularly availed credit to the tune of ₹ 1,70,290/- along with interest before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice. A small differential amount of ₹ 6,296/- was also reversed by them after passing of the order in original – It is also brought out that the appellants had sufficient credit balance and the wrongly availed credit was reversed before utilization.

Interest and penalty set aside without disturbing the confirmation of demand or interest already paid – appeal allowed in pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

st and penalties imposed. Aggrieved, the appellants are now before the Tribunal. 2. On behalf of the appellant, the learned Counsel, Shri V. S. Manoj, submitted that the appellant had reversed the credit of ₹ 1,70,290/- along with interest much before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice. There was a balance of ₹ 6,296/- which was reversed after the issuance of the order in original. Thus, the appellant has reversed the entire credit along with interest. On being pointed out about the mistake, the credit, having been reversed before utilization, he argued that there is no interest liability or penalties. He relied upon the decision in the case of Strategic Engineering Pvt. Ltd., (2014) 310 ELT 509 Madras, as well as the decisio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gic Engineering Pvt. Ltd. (supra) would be applicable. I, therefore, find that the penalty imposed is unwarranted and requires to be set aside, which I hereby do. The learned Counsel submitted that they are not liable to pay the interest on the differential amount of ₹ 6,296/- as per the decision of the Strategic Engineering Pvt. Ltd. (supra). 6. The impugned order is modified to the extent of setting aside the penalty and the demand of interest or the amount of ₹ 6296/- only without disturbing the confirmation of demand or interest already paid. Appeal allowed in above terms, with consequential reliefs, if any. (Dictated and pronounced in open Court) – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements – Orders – Tax Management India – taxma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Southern Agro Implements Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai North

2018 (8) TMI 1496 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – CENVAT Credit – input services – cleaning/housekeeping services – Held that:- The appellant has availed the impugned services for the purpose of cleaning the equipment/machinery used in the manufacturing activity. Further, housekeeping services were availed to keep the factory premises as well as the office attached to the factory in a clean and hygienic manner. These services are indispensable for the manufacturing activity and are integrally connected also – the denial of credit is unjustified – appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal No. E/42636/2017 – Final Order No. 41745/2018 – Dated:- 7-6-2018 – Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) Shri G. Mani, Advocate for the Appell

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

behalf of the appellant, the learned Counsel, Shri G. Mani submitted that the cleaning services were availed by the appellant for cleaning the equipment/machinery in the factory and the housekeeping services were availed for keeping the factory premises as well as the office premises in a clean and hygienic manner. That the second clause in the definition of input services would well cover the said services and that these services are related to the manufacturing activity. He relied upon the decision of Tribunal in the case of Sai life Sciences Ltd. Vs. CCE, Cus. & S.T., Hyderabad-IV, 2017 (51) S.T.R. 55 (Tri. – Hyd.) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. CCE Visakhapatnam-I, 2017 (47) S.T.R. 33 (Tri.- Hyd.). 3. The learned AR, S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST- REFUND- Constitution of Refund facilitation Cell in GST Facilitation Centers at District and State Head Quarters

GST – States – 26-CT-2697/2018 C1 – Dated:- 7-6-2018 – PROCEEDINGS OF THE Prl SECRETARY & COMMISSIONER, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (Present: Dr. Rajan N Khobragade IAS) Sub:- GST- REFUND- Constitution of Refund facilitation Cell in GST Facilitation Centers at District and State Head Quarters- reg:- Goods and Service Tax is launched on 1st July 2017. The law envisaged prompt refund mechanism. GSTN is developing online processing of refund application mechanism. Till complete online system is operational, manual system is operationalized. GST being a major tax reform in indirect taxation system in the Country, handholding support from officers to stakeholders for the change in the transformation to the GST is very important

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Tax Inspector to function in the Cell. (Ensure adequate number of officers in major districts where refund cases are more) III. It shall be embedded in the district GST Facilitation Centres (Tax Corners). 2. As a corollary, a State Refund Facilitation Cell shall be formed at the State head quarters to assist the District Refund Cell and for clarification on any matter which are required from the Commissionerate. 3. Sri. Mansur M I Asst. Commissioner (Internal Audit) and Sri.B.S. Haridas, Asst. Commissioner, O/o CST are nominated in the State Refund Cell. 4. The functions of the District Refund Facilitation Cell and State Refund Facilitation Cell shall be as follows: I. To act as a focal point in addressing refund related queries from tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reena Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Versus Kerala Water Authoirty

2018 (7) TMI 1824 – KERLA HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 16 (Ker.) – Quantum of GST – specified works already undertaken by the petitioner – the concerned officer is awaiting directions from the Head Office – Circular No.GST/002/17, dated 10.08.2018 – Held that:- I cannot immediately accede to the stand taken by the respondents because, as is clear from Ext.P5 circular, the Head Office, which is to mean the Managing Director, has already taken a decision to compensate the contractors to the extent of the GST paid by them on account of the fact that, at the time when the contract was entered into, the GST regime had not been implemented – I, therefore, fail to understand why the Deputy Chief Engineer should take a stand in the counter affidavit that he is still awaiting directions from the Head Office, when the circular makes it clear that all such payments are to be made to the contractors – petition disposed off. – WP(C).No. 13630 of 2018 Dated:- 7-6-2018 – DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nly issue, as per the petitioner, between them and the Water Authority is as to the manner in which the amount of tax under the GST regime is to be reckoned and adjusted as per the contract. 3. The petitioner says that, as is clear from Ext.P1, work orders, it was issued before the GST regime was brought into effect in the State of Kerala. They say that GST was implemented in the State of Kerala only with effect from 01.07.2017. The petitioner submits that the time when the notice inviting tender was published and tender process was undertaken, GST had not been implemented and hence, that the petitioner was allowed to enter into a contract, under which, they were obliged to pay Value Added Tax at the rate of 4.04%, Income Tax at the rate of 2.266% and Labour Workers' Welfare Fund of 1%. According to them, when the work was being executed by them, the GST regime was implemented, as per which, the contractors were obligated to pay tax at the rate of 18% instead of 4.04% VAT. The peti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al representations before the Water Authority, copies of which have been placed on record as Exts.P6 to P8 in W.P.(C) No.13676 of 2018 and as Exts.P6 to P9 in W.P.(C) No.13630 of 2018. They have filed these writ petitions praying that the Water Authority be directed to honour their bill and to pay them the GST already deposited by them. 6. I have heard Sri.Santhosh Mathew, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in both cases and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 7. Sri.Santhosh Mathew opens his submission in line with the facts narrated above and according to him, the only reason, as is discernible from the counter affidavit filed by the respondents in these cases, for not complying with the stipulations in Ext.P5 circular, is that the concerned officer is awaiting directions from the Head Office. He points out that there is no other reason stated in the counter affidavit and according to him, this stand of the respondents, that they are awaiting per

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dents because, as is clear from Ext.P5 circular, the Head Office, which is to mean the Managing Director, has already taken a decision to compensate the contractors to the extent of the GST paid by them on account of the fact that, at the time when the contract was entered into, the GST regime had not been implemented. I, therefore, fail to understand why the Deputy Chief Engineer should take a stand in the counter affidavit that he is still awaiting directions from the Head Office, when the circular makes it clear that all such payments are to be made to the contractors. 10. In any event of the matter, so long as the respondents do not have a case that the petitioner has not paid the GST amount or that he has not completed the works in question satisfactorily, it would not be reasonable on their part to keep these claims pending ad infinitum. I am certainly of the view that a decision on this regard has to be taken by the competent Authority imperatively and without any further delay.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Capita India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West

2018 (6) TMI 667 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI – Refund of service tax paid – export of services – rejection on the ground that services do not qualify as input service or same falls under exclusion category and also on the ground of non submission of documents – Held that:- All the services are essential services used for providing output service therefore refund in respect of cenvat credit on aforesaid services cannot be denied on the ground of nexus – refund allowed.

Non submission of documents – Held that:- The appellant have submitted invoices and challan through which service tax payment was made and the same were attached as exhibit J1 and J2. From this documents, it is clear that these documents are sufficient for processing refund claim therefore rejection of refund claim on the ground of non submission of documents is also not sustainable.

Rejection in respect of some services which constituted as sale of goods – Held that:- The payment made towards sale of diesel is not

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ss solutions P Ltd vs. C.S.T [2011 (9) TMI 450 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] it was held that merely because premises is not registered credit cannot be denied hence refund is admissible.

As regard the claim of the interest, since the said issue is not arising out of order, the same may be decided by the adjudicating authority in accordance with law at the time of sanction of refund claim.

Appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal Nos. ST/85468,85531,85746,85747,85749/2018 – Order No. A/86708-86712/2018 – Dated:- 7-6-2018 – Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member ( Judicial ) Shri Prasad Paranjape, Advocate, for appellant Shri Dilip Shinde, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for respondent ORDER These appeals are directed against Orders in appeal passed by the Commissioner(Appeals) whereby Ld. Commissioner(Appeals) upheld the rejection of refund claim amounting to ₹ 43,45,951/- for the period from April, 2013 to September, 2015. The said refund claim was filed by the appellant un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eceived from Emerson Network Power, it has been held that the naure of service cannot be identified from the invoice number 15MUMBO 4000 dated 17-04-2014 and accordingly, refund on the same has been rejected(Rs. 84,907). (iii) It has been held that the apartment/ premises in respect of which consulting services have been aid to Urban Link Consulting Pvt Ltd is not incorporated ST/85468,85531,85746,85747,85749/2 3 018 in the ST 2 certificate of the appellant. Accordingly, the appellant is not entitled to refund of credit on the same(Rs. 1,100). (iv) The learned Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the contention of the appellant that while computation of refund under Rule 5 of the CCR read with Notification No. 27/2012, refund should be computed by applying the export ratio on total cenvat credit availed for the period instead of unutilised cenvat credit remaining at the end of the period(Rs. 33,887) (v) It is inter alia held on scrutiny of the invoices it is clear that customs house age

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

allegation of sale of goods and not service, he submits that Ld. Commissioner has erred in holding that input service received as sale of goods. In case of vendor Magarpatta township develop & Const. Co Ltd transaction is of sale of diesel, he submits that vendor is providing power back up service to the appellant by means of diesel Generator set in the premises of the appellant. These services are for uninterrupted power supply. The charges of the same was cost of such operating expenses including the cost of diesel reimbursed by the appellant therefore even though the cost of diesel is reimbursed services provided is operating diesel set for uninterrupted supply of power, it cannot be said that appellant made payment against sale of the goods. 4. As regard the charge of sale of text article, he submits that service have been availed for preparation of various study material used for purpose of training, needs for the employee, appellant has not purchased any goods. In this regard

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed in various judgments that even if premises is not registered but so long as it was used for providing output service, credit is admissible and consequently refund is also admissible. He placed reliance on the following judgments: (a) Commissioner of C. Ex. &ST NoidaVs Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd [2017(52) S.T.R. 497 (Tri. All)] ST/85468,85531,85746,85747,85749/2 6 018 affirmed in Commissioner Vs. Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd [2017(52) S.T.R. J 253(All)] (b) Deepak Fertilizer & Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd Vs CCE[2013(32) S.TR. 532(Bom)] (c) M portal India Wireless Solutions P. Ltd Vs. C.S.T. [2012(27)S.T.R. 134(Kar)] 7. As regard the dispute on the formula provided under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 he submits that Ld. Commissioner has failed to correctly apply the formula for computation of refund for the period April, 2013 to September, 2013 inasmuch as he contended that unutilised Cenvat credit remaining at the end of the period should be taken as total Cenvat credit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

entitled to interest on delay in sanctioning of refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 8. On the other hand, Shri. Dilip Shinde, Ld. AssttCommissioner(A.R) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. 9. I find that major amount of refund was rejected on the ground that services do not qualify as input service or same falls under exclusion category. In this regard, I would like to go through nature of service and use thereof which are reproduced below as submitted by appellant; (i) Works Contract Services- Disputed amount ₹ 25,24,004 These services are procured in relation to the modernisation, renovation and repairs of the premises/office equipment of the appellant. Accordingly, these services are used in relation to the output services provided by the Company. The said services are not covered under the exclusion clause of the definition of "input service" as provided under Rule 2(l) of the Credit Rules. The det

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

quires these services for modernisation/ renovation of various electrical/ office equipment used in the business premises which support the process of output services exported. Further, these services have been procured with respect to the installation/ re-erection of office units of the Appellant and other office equipment used at the business premises from where the output services are provided. These units/ equipment are used on a day-to-day basis in provision of output services. Accordingly, these services are essential to keep the assets in good condition without which the output services cannot be rendered. Therefore, maintenance and repair, installation and re-erectioning services are essential in provision of output services by the Appellant. The specimen copies of the invoices are attached at page no. 30-31 of the compilation. (iv) Management maintenance and re • air services – The Appellant requires these services for regular various maintenance of electrical equipment/

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and processing, reply to various letters) which are have a direct nexus with the business of the Appellant. The amount charged as out of pocket expenses and Misc. Expenses or administration expenses on which the credit is sought to be denied have been incurred during the provision of services provided by the vendor. Further, as per Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, all the expenditure or costs incurred by the service provider in the course of providing taxable service shall be treated as consideration for the taxable service and included in the value for the purpose of charging service tax. Given the same, it is pertinent to note that the said expenses are part of the provision of the main service provide by the vendor and tax is charged on the same as per the above rule. Accordingly, these services are used only in relation to the output services provided by the Appellant and hence the credit cannot be denied on the same. (vi) Outdoor catering services –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he employees of the company during their overseas visit to provide the output services exported. The said overseas visit are to the customers/ branches/ subsidiaries of the Appellant purely in relation to official work. Accordingly, these services are used in relation to the output services provided by the Appellant. (viii) Sponsorship Services – The said service is availed by the Appellant towards participation of specific employees in certain business conventions/ conferences to represent the Appellant. As per the prescribed procedure, the Appellant has discharged the service tax on the same under reverse charge basis and availed credit of the same. Accordingly, the said services are towards the business of the Appellant and the credit cannot be denied on the same. architect Services – These services have been availed in relation to sketching, specification and drawing plans of different modernisation and renovation works done at the business premises of the Appellant. Accordingly, t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e cafeteria. As submitted above, maintenance of canteen is a must for the Appellant and hence the said services received can be said to be directly in relation the Appellant's business. (xi)Public relations management services The said services have been availed by the Appellant in relation to various strategic counselling for the industry, media and perception research etc. The Appellant requires the said services for the purpose of analysing the market position and financial public relation. Accordingly, the said services are essential requirement of the Appellant to maintain its market value and used for the provision of services rendered. (xii) Customs House Agent Services – disputed amount ₹ 22,857 The said services have been availed in relation to procurement of imported equipment which are used for provision of output services exported. The said equipment are primarily the I. T. equipment which is used in the provision of the output services by the Appellant. According

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

being availed by the company in relation to preparation of lease deed of the rented premises of the company. The said services are essential to manage certain legal matters in an organized and systematic manner which are necessary for smooth running of the business of the Appellant. As prescribed, the Appellant has discharged the service tax on such legal consultancy service as a recipient of service under reverse charge mechanism and hence is entitled to avail t same he credit of the (xvi) Banking and Other Financial Services- disputed amount ₹ 8 738 The Appellant has availed these services in relation to purchase of foreign currency to be used by its employees during their official overseas visits for providing the output services. Accordingly, these services are used in relation to the provision of output services of the Appellant and hence have a direct nexus to the services exported by the Appellant. The specimen invoice copies are attached at page no. 37 to 46 of the compi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or the smooth functioning of the business of the Appellant. Accordingly, the said services have a direct nexus with the output services exported by the Appellant. (xviii) Video Tape Production Agency Services- The said services have been availed by the company in relation to video recording of certain events during the business meetings, seminars etc. of the company. Accordingly, these services are used in relation to the output services provided by the Appellant. (xix) Technical Inspection and Certification Services These services have been procured for inspection and testing of earthing wiring of the business premises. The said services are essential to maintain the proper working condition of various equipments used by the employees. Accordingly, these services are essentially required and used in relation to the output services provided by the Appellant. (xx) Photography services- The said services have been rendered by the vendor during the business events organised by the company

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y the Appellant. (xxiii) Event Management services- These services have been availed from the vendor in relation to poster designing & printing of the same. The said posters are displayed in various events for the purpose of business promotion and advertisement of the appellant s business. Promotion of business is an important requirement of the appellant. Accordingly, the said services are essential and used in relation to the out put services provided by the appellant. 10. From the nature of the services and use thereof as reproduced above, I find that all the services are essential services used for providing output service therefore refund in respect of cenvat credit on aforesaid services cannot be denied on the ground of nexus. 11. As regard the charge of exclusion of the service from the definition of input service under Rule 2(l), I find that except works contract service all other services are falling under inclusion category. As regard the works contract service, it is in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fore even though the reimbursement toward supply of diesel, it is related to supply of service to operate DG set. Vendor also paid service tax on such charges. In case of transaction alleged to have made as sale of text article, I find that this payment is towards preparation of various study material used for purpose of training needs of the employee which are required to provide out put service of the appellant. Therefore credit in respect of services or preparation of study material is admissible. 14. As regard erection, commission and installation, Ld. Commissioner denied the refund on the ground that service cannot be identified form the invoices, I find that appellant had explained to the ld. Commissioner(Appeals) that these services were availed in relation to installation/re-erection of the office unit of the appellant and other office equipment used at the business premises. Description mentioned in the invoice i.e. labour charges per spot service is related to labour work don

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendments to Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 – Extension to Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) and compensation Cess exemption under EOU scheme till 01.10.2018 — regd.

DGFT – 10/2015-2020 – Dated:- 7-6-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOTIFICATION No. 10/2015-2020 NEW DELHI, DATED THE 7th June, 2018 Subject: Amendments to Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 Extension to Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) and compensation Cess exemption under EOU scheme till 01.10.2018 – regd. S.O(E) – In exercise of powers conferred by Section 5 of FT(D&R) Act, 1992, read with Paragraph 1.02 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20, as amended from time to time, the Central Government hereby makes following amendments in Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20: 1 . Existing Para 6.08(b) reads as under: For services, including software units, sale in DTA in any mode, including on line

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Applicable GST rate on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLCs), Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and other similar scrips.

Goods and Services Tax – Applicable GST rate on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLCs), Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and other similar scrips. – TMI Updates – Highlights

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on export of Goods-Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and Clarification in other cases

Customs – Refund of IGST on export of Goods-Extension of date in SB005 alternate mechanism cases and Clarification in other cases – TMI Updates – Highlights

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exposition on E-way Bill Rules (Question-Answer format)

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – Amrit Mohanty – Dated:- 6-6-2018 Last Replied Date:- 9-6-2018 – With the advent of the E-Way Bill Rules and provisions under the GST laws, the following article has been prepared to provide a substantive understanding of the law surrounding E-way Bills. Firstly we would discuss in a point-wise manner the law surrounding e-way bills and its requirements. The following may please be noted: E-way Bill is not fundamentally a GST document. Applicability of GST law is in no way based upon the practice of E-way bills and neither is the charge of GST in any manner linked to e-way bill rules and provisions. Therefore beginning from the very precipice down to the intricate details, we must refrain from drawing any inferences from the general laws and principles of GST while interpreting the provisions of E-way Bills or while carrying out the practice of e-way bills no matter how so logically intuitive they may seem. E-way Bill is a document that can be said

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the documents and devices and also allow the inspection of the goods. Under section 68 of the CGST Act, 2017 the E-way Rules have been notified under Chapter-XVI of the CGST Rules, 2017. Under the said rules, there are two broad based directions: Rule 138 : Furnish the specified Information in the online portal about the movement of goods and generate an e-way bill. Rule 138A : Person in charge of the conveyance shall carry the above generated e-way bill/ e-way bill number in electronic form/ e-way bill number mapped to a RFID embedded unto the conveyance. First we shall go into the specifics of the first direction i.e furnishing of specified information in the online portal about the movement of goods and generate an e-way bill. The specifics are furnished below in a question answer format (along with the exceptions) for easy understanding of the reader. Also for better understanding we would suggest the reader to proceed into reading the questions in the order of numerical progressi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

der reverse charge respectively. Who is required to furnish the information about the movement of the goods? Every registered person who causes the movement of goods -in relation to supply -for reasons other than supply -due to inward supply from unregistered person. Therefore the supplier or the recipient of goods, who so ever is registered and causes the movement of goods shall furnish the information. Further if neither of them do so, the transporter may also (also see Q.9 and Q.10) on authorization received from the registered person furnish the information. Furthermore e-commerce operator (amazon, flipkart etc) may also furnish information if goods are supplied through it. Where and in what form does this aforesaid information need to be furnished? The information is needed to be furnished in Part A of Form GST EWB-01 electronically on the common portal. What are the information required in Part A of Form GST EWB-01? The following: A.1 GSTIN of Supplier A.2 Place of Dispatch A.3 G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

through a transporter? Yes, Where the goods are transported by the registered person as a consignor or the recipient of supply as the consignee, whether in his own conveyance or a hired one or a public conveyance, by road, the said person shall be required to generate the e-way bill by the standard usual process. With reference to Q.8, what shall be the case where the goods are handed over to the transporter for transportation by road? The registered person shall furnish the information relating to the transporter on the common portal. Moreover as mentioned in Q.3 the transporter (on authorization received from the registered person) may also furnish the information on the common portal in Part A of form GST EWB-01 and continue with the process of generation of e-way bill. 10. With reference to Q.3 and Q.8 and Q.9, what shall be the case where the movement of goods is caused by an unregistered person? In a case where movement of goods is caused by an unregistered person either in his o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hed in Part-A of form GST EWB-01 and the unique number is generated? With reference to Q. 6, After the information is furnished in Part-A of form GST EWB-01 and the unique number is generated, the registered supplier or recipient or the transporter, as the case may be, shall furnish the details of Vehicle (i.e Vehicle number for road) using the unique number in Part-B of form GST EWB-01 after which an E-way bill shall be generated in the portal itself and only after generation of the E-way bill with the furnishing of info in Part-B of form GST EWB-01, will it be valid for movement of goods by road. Further upon generation of e-way bill on the common portal, a unique e-way bill number (EBN) shall be made available to the supplier, the recipient and the transporter on the common portal. Is there any exemption from furnishing of details of vehicle i.e. the Part-B of Form GST EWB-01 ? Yes, under the following two circumstances: In case where the goods are transported for a distance of upto

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y bill shall be generated by the registered person, being the supplier or the recipient, who shall, either before or after the commencement of movement, furnish, on the common portal, the information in Part-B of Form GST EWB-01. Further where the goods are transported by railways, the railways shall not deliver the goods unless the e-way bill required under these rules is produced at the time of delivery. What procedure is required to be followed wherein multiple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance? In such cases, multiple e-way bills are required to be generated for each such consignment. The transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated e-way bill in Form GST EWB-02 may be generated by him on the said portal prior to the movement of goods. What shall be procedure to be followed in case the neither the consignor nor the consignee generate the E-wa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ill or a consolidate E-way bill? The E-way bill s validity period is determined based on the distance it is required to travel. The following table shows the distance upto which the conveyance needs to travel within the respective time from the relevant date so as to keep the E-way bill validated and on failure of which the e-way bill shall be invalidated and a fresh e-way bill will then have to be generated: Sl. No. Validity Period Upto 100 km One day in cases other than over dimensional cargo For every 100 km. Or part thereof thereafter One additional day in cases other than over dimensional cargo Upto 20km One day in case of over dimensional cargo For every 20 km. Or part thereof thereafter One additional day in cases of over dimensional cargo Relevant date means the date on which the e-way bill has been generated and the period of validity shall be counted from the time at which the e-way bill has been generated and each day shall be counted as the period expiring at midnight of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iner depot or a container freight station for clearance by Customs; (d) in respect of movement of goods within such areas as are notified under clause (d) of sub-rule (14) of rule 138 of the State or Union territory Goods and Services Tax Rules in that particular State or Union territory; (e) where the goods, other than de-oiled cake, being transported, are specified in the Schedule appended to notification No. 2/2017- Central tax (Rate) (f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel; (g) where the supply of goods being transported is treated as no supply under Schedule III of the Act; (h) where the goods are being transported- (i) under customs bond from an inland container depot or a container freight station to a customs port, airport, air cargo complex and land customs station, or from one customs station or customs port to another cus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

scription of goods Liquefied petroleum gas for supply to household and non domestic exempted category (NDEC) customers Kerosene oil sold under PDS Postal baggage transported by Department of Posts Natural or cultured pearls and precious or semi-precious stones; precious metals and metals clad with precious metal (Chapter 71) Jewellery, goldsmiths and silversmiths wares and other articles (Chapter 71) Currency Used personal and household effects Coral, unworked (0508) and worked coral (9601) The above 20 Question were relating to the first direction as mentioned in page 2 last para. Moving to second broad direction the following questions have been answered: What is the liability of the person in charge of a conveyance? The person in charge of conveyance shall carry- The invoice or the bill of supply or delivery challan as the case may be; and A copy of the e-way bill in physical form or the e-way bill number in electronic form or mapped to a Radio frequency Identification Device embedd

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lls. Given the standard practice prevalent in varied industries which are not homogenous, the processes and procedures of each organisation need to be optimized around the above provisions so as to result in most efficient compliance of E-way bill provisions. Further we must acknowledge the fact thatcertain ambiguities and apprehensions still persists which may be due to varied interpretations and insufficienciesof the statute which may lead the reader into resorting to best possible assumptions in the given scenario and the material provided above may not be free from the same. All ambiguities and doubts would eventually be removed after regular and practical usage of the E-way bill provisions and after comprehending in substance the beneficial features as well as the limitations of the IT infrastructure in place supporting the E-way Bill. For any further clarifications and valuable suggestions on the material provided above please do communicate. Article written by:- Amrit Aaron Moha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: R. VIDYASAGAR RAO CONSTRUCTIONS

2019 (1) TMI 1367 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, HYDERABAD TELANGANA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 482 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of services – “Works Contract” or “Composite Supply” – rate of tax – combination of services of excavation of sand including loading with machinery at reach, formation of Ramps and maintenance of Roads, transportation charges for the tractors/ tippers of sand from reach to stockyard and loading cost of sand from stockyard to lorries – difference of opinion.

Held that:- Since there is no uniform opinion arrived by the Members representing Central Tax and State Tax and they have expressed two different views on classification of services and applicable rate of tax on the services rendered by the applicant, the application filed by M/s. R. Vidyasagar Rao Constructions, Plot No. 98 & 99, Lumbini layout, near Euro School, Gachibowli, Hyderabad-36 (GSTIN No. 36AAGFR6627L12Q), is being referred to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for the State o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the rate of tax applicable on the consideration received there for. 2. The applicant submitted the application in Form GST ARA-01 and Statement containing the applicant's interpretation of law & relevant facts and requested for advance ruling on classification of services rendered by them and rate of tax applicable. They have submitted a copy of Challan evidencing payment of application fee of ₹ 10,000/-. 3. A personal hearing was held in this case and the assessee have appeared for personal hearing on 3-4-2018 along with their Advocate Dr. T. Ramesh Babu and explained their case as under : (a) The applicant is a contractor to Telangana State Mineral Development Corporation Limited (TSMDC). TSMDC has entrusted the following work to the applicant: excavation of sand including loading with machinery at reach transportation of above sand from the reach to stockyard loading the so stocked sand to the lorries for further transportation by the contractee formation of ramps, ro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n of the ramps and roads, the 'works contract' takes place. After formation of ramps and roads, the so formed immovable property would become the permanent property of the contractee. (d) The ramps and roads so formed, while certain of them would be submerged in water when the irrigation project comes into existence, certain of them would remain as they are for use by the public. (e) Therefore, the activity of the applicant would fit into the ambit of 'works contract' as defined under sub-section (119) of Section 2 of the GST Acts. Such works contract falls under paragraph No. 6(a) of Schedule-II to the GST Acts. (f) In respect of the rate of tax applicable, the applicant is of the view that they are required to pay CGST 2.5% + SGST 2.5% = 5% as given in the CBEC Notification No. 31/2017, dated 13-10-2017 issued in G.O. Ms No. 253, Revenue (CT-II) department dated 23-11-2017. (g) The applicant is also under strong belief that the activities they are rendering to the con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as L1 Bidder by quoting ₹ 74.36 per CBM of sand for excavation of 15,60,000 CBM of sand from Block III, Damerakunta-III, over an extent of 52 Ha., at submergence areas of Annaram Barrage, Kaleshwaram Project and transport the same quantity of sand to nearby stockyard (within 1 Km from the submergence area) and again loading of sand into Lorries at stockyard. TSMDC had issued the letter of intent to the contractor on 27-1-2017 for execution of the agreement for excavation of the sand as mentioned above. (a) On perusal of the scope of the work specified in the said agreement, it is found that the contractor shall excavate sand and transport the same to the stockyard and again load the same into the lorries at stockyard. The equipment/vehicles and manpower required for the said activities is the responsibility of the contractor. The services to be rendered by the contractor as part of the agreement consists of the following components. (i) excavation of sand; (ii) transportation of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sand Mining Rules, 2015, for execution of the work. (e) It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to lay/ form required road from stockyard to nearby connectivity road for plying of lorries/vehicles, any incidental expenditure incurred and involved thereon for laying & maintenance of roads shall be borne by the contractor. 2. Thus it is very clear from the agreement entered between the contractor and the contractee, the main work to be rendered by the contractor involves excavation of sand at submergence areas of Annaram Barrage and transport the same quantity of sand to nearby stockyard and again loading of sand into lorries at stockyard. Laying of roads from stockyard to nearby connectivity roads for plying of lorries is incidental to transport of sand excavated from the submergence areas of Annaram Barrage to nearby stockyard. Hence the claim made by the applicant that the activity rendered by them falls under works contract is not tenable. 3. The service supplied by the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

' and hence excavation of sand is the principal supply in the composite supply of the services rendered by the applicant. In view of the above discussion, the contention of the applicant that the impugned contract needs to be treated as 'Works contract' is not acceptable and hence the question of application of tax rate of 5% (2.5% + 2.5%) as per Notification No. 46/2017-CGST (Rate), dated 14-11-2017 and Notification No. 31/2017 of TGST Act in G.O.Ms. No. 23-11-2017 does not arise. 4. The alternate argument put forth by the applicant during the time of personal hearing is that even if the contract is treated as Composite supply other than 'Works Contract', the predominant and the object of the contract is 'transportation of goods' in a vessel i.e. container on which GST rate 5% (2.5% + 2.5%) is applicable and hence the applicant pleaded for the ruling of the same. 5. The Sl. No. 9 of the Notification No. 11/2017-Centra1 Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 is extract

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alled. 2.5 Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)] (iv) Transport of goods in containers by rail by any person other than Indian Railways. 6 – (v) Goods transport services other than (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above. 9 – 6. The Tariff Heading 9965 (Goods transport services) specified against Sl. No. 9 covers five categories of services of goods transport. The claim of the applicant is that their composite supply falls under 'Transport of goods in a vessel.' Specified at (ii) under column (3) against Sl. No. 9. The said category of transport covers goods transport in a vessel. The 'vessel' referred to in the above said notification means ship/ large boat used for transport of goods by sea/inland waters. Hence the case on hand do not fall under '(ii) Transport of goods in a vessel.' as claimed by the applicant. The word 'vessel' has been defined u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

olumn (3) against Tariff Heading 9965 (Goods transport services) in the Notification No. 11/2017. 8. Thus in view of the above discussion, and the service rendered by the applicant being a composite supply with three components of services viz., (i) excavation of sand at submergence areas of Annaram Barrage, (ii) transportation of such excavated sand to stockyard nd (iii) loading of the sand into lorries at the stockyard; and the principle supply being excavation of sand as mentioned in the scope of work of the agreement between the applicant and TSMDC, theservices rendered by the applicant are classifiable as Excavating and Earthmoving Services under Heading 995433 of GST tariff and rate of tax applicable is 9% CGST + 9% SGST. II. Opinion expressed by the member representing State Tax: Facts: (a) The applicant is a contractor to Telangana State Mineral Development Corporation Limited (TSMDC). TSMDC has entrusted the following work to the applicant: Tender Document Reference: TSMDC/SAN

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ding cost of sand from Stockyard to lorries: 30% Agreement Dated 18-3-2017: Contractee: TSMD Corporation – Contractor: R. Vidya Sagar Rao – Partnership firm) Contractee accepted the tender submitted by the Contractor, who emerged as L1 Bidder by quoting ₹ 74.36 per CBM of sand for excavation of 15,60,000 CBM of sand from over an extent of 52 Ha. At submerged areas of Annaram Barrage, Kaleswaram Project and transport the same quantity of sand nearby Stockyard and again loading of sand into the lorries at Stockyard…….Page 2 & 3. Laying roads: It is the sole responsibility of the Contractor to lay/ form required road from stockyard to nearby connectivity road for plying of lorries/vehicles, any incidental expenditure incurred and involved for laying & maintenance of roads shall be borne by the Contractor…… Page 8. Letter of intent dated 27-1-2017: At its page 1 the acceptance of price for CBM consisting the above contract fixed at ₹ 74.36 and accepted and commu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of Section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, involving predominantly earth work (that is, constituting more than 75 percent. of the value of the works contract) provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union territory, local authority, a Governmental Authority or a Government Entity. 2.5 Provided that where the services are supplied to a Government Entity, they should have been procured by the said entity in relation to a work entrusted to it by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory or local authority, as the case may be 2. Secondly, he states the supply being composite supply it is Goods Transportation supply on vessel as per notification No. 11/2017, dated 28-6-2017 as per G.O.Ms No. 110, Revenue (CT-II) Department, dated 29-6-2017, which is as under : Sl. No. Chapter, Section or Heading Description of Service Rate (percent.) Condition (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 9 Heading 9965 (Goods transport services) (i) Transport of goods by rail [other

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

an Indian Railways. 6 – (v) Goods transport services other than (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above. 9 Analysis of the facts & Conclusions: 1. Before proceeding further, it needs to kept in view that in ₹ 74/- the same ratios as mentioned above are there for the independent components of supplies since there is no change in the denoted supplies in the tender and the agreement, the change is in overall price only. Basis for the agreement is the tender and such fact is not to be ignored. 2. For brevity in the foregoing paragraphs, TSMDC is referred to as 'receiver' and the applicant is as 'provider'. 3. In order to address the above questions, it is necessary to examine whether or not the work entrusted to the provider by the receiver is just for a supply simplicitor or does it involved with more than one 'supply' viz.: in combination of supply of goods and supply of services or 'supply of different services joined together' in the event of which the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of excavation as such and the same is to be ascertained out of ₹ 30/- referred for loading charges for machinery at reach i.e. source where from the sand acquired. Such fact makes it clear that out such ₹ 30/- only a portion whatsoever is to be apportioned excavating sand from the source and the rest such would remains to be for loading the sand so culled out to the machinery available for transportation. 6. Therefore the first part being the excavation and loading work in this contract. This activity to be started with laying ramps and roads to enable the containers in which the excavated sand is to be loaded reach the resource of sand. As the provider only to do this job with his cost which means it is to be born out of ₹ 74…agreed upon between him and the recipient. 7. Therefore, formation of these ramps and roads in which supply of goods and services involved which amount to composite supply of works contract as defined under Section 2(119) of the Act. Such WCT

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ontractual terms it is very clear that this service is to be done by the provider only. Then only the so loaded lorries would ply on the so formed roads which needs to be maintained by the provider only Hence the last actions of the provider ends with maintenance of roads formed by him only which too require men and material/ service and labour which again amounts to Works contract. These roads also facilitate the transportation of sand. 12. Important to notice laying ramps and roads and maintenance thereof is not for the provider himself but it is a part of the whole activity. 13. Thus formation of ramps, internal roads, formation of external roads and their maintenance are works contract only but they are facilitating supplies to the main supply of transportation of sand from one place to other. Hence, transportation of goods needs aid of laying ramps and roads rather than the excavation needing laying of ramps and roads. 14. In view of the above analysis, the request of the applican

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In a composite supply the taxability under the scheme of the Act is on the basis of principle supply 18. Sub-section (30) of Section 2 of the TGST Act, 'Composite supply' is defined as: composite supply means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply"; Example in for composite supply under the Act is as under : Illustration: Where goods are packed and transported with insurance, the supply of goods, packing materials, transport and insurance is a composite supply and supply of goods is a principal supply. 19. A plain reading of the above definition makes it clear that 'Composite supply' is one which consists more than one supply naturally bundled to each other and the example given above is one for the same amongst the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of services and it is possible in these types of contracts. 22. The intention behind the contract is to shift the goods viz. sand from one place to other distinguishable from 'excavation' simplicitor. 23. The value of transportation being 32.5% and the value 7.5% i.e. of formation of internal ramps and roads and external roads and their maintenance which are interlinked and for transportation of sand put together comes to 45%. 24. Here, it is pertinent to go through the Section 8 of TGST Act, 2017: Section 8. The tax liability on a composite or a mixed supply shall be determined in the following manner, namely: – (a) a composite supply comprising two or more supplies, one of which is a principal supply, shall be treated as a supply of such principal supply; and (b) a mixed supply comprising two or more supplies shall be treated as a supply of that particular supply which attracts the highest rate of tax. 25. A careful reading of the above Section and keeping in view of the abov

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)] (iii) Services of goods transport agency (GTA) in relation to transportation of goods (including used household goods for personal use). Explanation. – goods transport agency means any person who provides service in relation to transport of goods by road and issues consignment note, by whatever name called. 2.5 Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)] (iv) Transport of goods in containers by rail by any person other than Indian Railways. 6 – (v) Goods transport services other than (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above. 9 28. The applicant is not engaged in transpiration of goods or passengers by rail, not engaged as a Goods Transport Agency also. 29. The left over tariffs are Transportation of goods by Vessel i.e. 2.5% CGST and 2.5% SGST, or 18% under residuary entry. 30. The applicant stated in the application for ruling and als

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r carry the disentitlement of input tax credit and the latter carries no such disentitlement. 35. In view of the above discussion, and the service rendered by the applicant supply with the components of services viz, (i) Laying internal ramps and roads, (ii) excavation of sand at submergence areas of Annaram Barrage, (iii) transportation of such excavated sand to stockyard and (iv) loading of the sand into lorries at the stockyard; and laying and maintenance of external roads within the price of ₹ 74/- per CBM is a composite supply and the principal supply being transportation of sand 'scope of work' of the agreement between the applicant and TSMDC, the services rendered by the applicant are classifiable as Goods Transporting by Vessel and GST tariff and rate of tax applicable is 2.5% CGST + 2.5% SGST subject to condition that the applicant not entitled to ITC to the extent mentioned in the proviso in column 5 of (v) entry as mentioned above as per G.O.Ms No. 110, Revenue

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Customs – Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems – certain guidelines

Customs – PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs – Dated:- 6-6-2018 – OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTNIVE) 55-17-3, C-14, 2nd Floor, Road No.2 Industrial Estate, Autonagar, Vijayawada – 520007 Phone: 0866-2551261 Fax: 0866-2551156 C. No. VIII/09/01/2017-Cus.Tech (PF-I) Date: 06.06.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs Subject : Regarding. ***** Attention of all the Importers, Exporters, Customs Brokers, Steamer Agents, Custodians/Customs Cargo Service Providers, Trade Associations/Chamber of Commerce, Members of the RAC/PGC and the Public is invited to the Circular No. 12/2018-Customs dated 29.05.2018 issued from F. No.450/119/2017 by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs communicating procedure / guidelines for sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from GSTN to DG Systems. The said procedure / guidelines are as below: A number of representations have been received from the exporters / trade associations seeking resolution

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

STR-3B. The exporters have also in certain cases short paid IGST vis-a-vis their liability declared in GSTR1. As a result of these mismatches in the amount of IGST paid on export goods between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, the transmission of records from GSTN to Customs EDI system has not happened and consequently IGST refunds could not be processed. The problem is compounded by the fact that the facility to adjust GSTR-3B in subsequent months is not available in all cases. 3. In view of the above following procedure is being prescribed to overcome the problem of refund blockage. This would be an interim solution subject to undertakings/ submission of CA certificates by the exporters as given below and post refund audit scrutiny. The proposed procedure is as under: A. Cases where there is no short payment: (i) The Customs policy wing would prepare a list of exporters whose cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies, for the period July' 2017 to Marc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TINs who have not submitted the CA certificate to the Board by the 15th November 2018. (v) Non submission of CA certificate shall affect the future IGST refunds of the exporter. (v) The list of exporters whose refunds have been processed as above shall be sent to DG (Audit)/ DG (GST) by the Board. B. Cases where there is short payment: (i) In cases where there is a short payment of IGST i.e. cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies together, for the period of July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is less than the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GSTR-1 for the same period, the Customs policy wing would send the list of such exporters to the GSTN and all the Chief Commissioner of Customs. (ii) e-mails shall be sent by GSTN to each exporter referred in para (i) above so as to inform the exporter that their records are held up due to short payment of IGST. The e-mail shall also advise the exporters to observe the procedure un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed Account that the shortfall amount has been liquidated. (v) The exporter would give an undertaking they would return the refund amount in case it is found to be not due to them at a later date. (vi) The Customs zones shall compile the list of exporters (GSTIN only), who have come forward to claim refund after making requisite payment of IGST towards short paid amount and complied with other prescribed requirements. (vii)The compiled list may be forwarded to Customs policy wing, DG (Audit) and DG (GST). Customs policy wing shall forward the said list of GSTINs to GSTN. On receipt of the list of exporters from Customs policy wing, GSTN shall transmit the records of those exporters to Customs EDI system. (viii) The exporters whose refunds are processed / sanctioned as above would be required to submit another certificate from Chartered Accountant before 31st October, 2018 to the same Customs office at the port of export to the effect that there is no discrepancy between the IGST amount

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ST officers (both Centre / State) informing that these exporters have taken benefit of the procedure prescribed in this circular. The jurisdictional GST formations shall also verify the payment particulars at their end. 6 This Circular deals only with the cases where the records have not been transmitted by GSTN to Customs EDI system. Once the records are transmitted by GSTN to Customs System based upon the above mentioned procedure, the usual procedure adopted in case of sanction of IGST refunds would have to be followed. In cases where the errors like SB005, SB002, SB006 etc are encountered with the records so transmitted, the provisions of Circulars issued by Board earlier shall apply to them. 7. The officers of Kakinada & Krishnapatnam Custom Houses and ICD, Marripalem, Guntur District may, therefore, take necessary steps to bring these changes to the knowledge of exporters. 8. Difficulties, if any, may be brought to the notice of the undersigned. 9. Action to be taken in terms

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Customs – Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems – certain guidelines

Customs – PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs – Dated:- 6-6-2018 – OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTNIVE) 55-17-3, C-14, 2nd Floor, Road No.2, Industrial Estate, Autonagar, Vijayawada – 520007 Phone: 0866-2551261 Fax: 0866-2551156 C. No. VIII/09/01/2017-Cus.Tech.(PF-I) Date: 06.06.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs Subject : Regarding. ***** Attention of all the Importers, Exporters, Customs Brokers, Steamer Agents, Custodians/Customs Cargo Service Providers, Trade Associations/Chamber of Commerce, Members of the RAC/PGC and the Public is invited to the Circular No. 12/2018-Customs dated 29.05.2018 issued from F. No.450/119/2017 by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs communicating procedure / guidelines for sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from GSTN to DG Systems. The said procedure / guidelines are as below: A number of representations have been received from the exporters / trade associations seeking resolutio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR-3B. The exporters have also in certain cases short paid IGST vis-a-vis their liability declared in GSTRI. As a result of these mismatches in the amount of IGST paid on export goods between GSTR-I and GSTR-3B, the transmission of records from GSTN to Customs EDI system has not happened and consequently IGST refunds could not be processed. The problem is compounded by the fact that the facility to adjust GSTR-3B in subsequent months is not available in all cases. 3. In view of the above following procedure is being prescribed to overcome the problem of refund blockage. This would be an interim solution subject to undertakings/ submission of CA certificates by the exporters as given below and post refund audit scrutiny. The proposed procedure is as under: A. Cases where there is no short payment: (i) The Customs policy wing would prepare a list of exporters whose cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies, for the period July' 2017 to Mar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

STINs who have not submitted the CA certificate to the Board by the 15th November 2018. (v) Non submission of CA certificate shall affect the future IGST refunds of the exporter. (vi) The list of exporters whose refunds have been processed as above shall be sent to DG (Audit)/ DG (GST) by the Board. B. Cases where there is short payment: (i) In cases where there is a short payment of IGST i.e. cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies together, for the period of July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is less than the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GSTR-I for the same period, the Customs policy wing would send the list of such exporters to the GSTN and all the Chief Commissioner of Customs. (ii) e-mails shall be sent by GSTN to each exporter referred in para (i) above so as to inform the exporter that their records are held up due to short payment of IGST. The e-mail shall also advise the exporters to observe the procedure

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ered Account that the shortfall amount has been liquidated. (v) The exporter would give an undertaking they would return the refund amount in case it is found to be not due to them at a later date. (vi) The Customs zones shall compile the list of exporters (GSTIN only), who have come forward to claim refund after making requisite payment of IGST towards short paid amount and complied with other prescribed requirements. (vii) The compiled list may be forwarded to Customs policy wing, DG (Audit) and DG (GST). Customs policy wing shall forward the said list of GSTINs to GSTN. On receipt of the list of exporters from Customs policy wing, GSTN shall transmit the records of those exporters to Customs EDI system. (viii) The exporters whose refunds are processed / sanctioned as above would be required to submit another certificate from Chartered Accountant before 31st October, 2018 to the same Customs office at the port of export to the effect that there is no discrepancy between the IGST amou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l GST officers (both Centre / State) informing that these exporters have taken benefit of the procedure prescribed in this circular. The jurisdictional GST formations shall also verify the payment particulars at their end. 6 This Circular deals only with the cases where the records have not been transmitted by GSTN to Customs EDI system. Once the records are transmitted by GSTN to Customs System based upon the above mentioned procedure, the usual procedure adopted in case of sanction of IGST refunds would have to be followed. In cases where the errors like SB005, SB002, SB006 etc are encountered with the records so transmitted, the provisions of Circulars issued by Board earlier shall apply to them. 7. The officers of Kakinada & Krishnapatnam Custom Houses and ICD, Marripalem, Guntur District may, therefore, take necessary steps to bring these changes to the knowledge of exporters. 8. Difficulties, if any, may be brought to the notice of the undersigned. 9. Action to be taken in te

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =