Neeraj Jain Versus Union of India

2018 (11) TMI 707 – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 131 (Cal) – Enlargement on Bail – Section 132(1)(a),(b) and (c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Held that:- The authority of the opposite party will take endeavour to record or to interrogate the accused/petitioner in custody in the correction home as per the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate by recording his statement. So, this application is kept pending as deferred in the next week. – CRM 3328 of 2018 Dated:- 7-6-2018 – Shivakant Prasad, J. Mr. Debasish Roy, Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar, Mr. Danish Haque, Mr. Arindam Dey, Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Ms. Aroshi Rathore, Ms. Kriti Mehorotra, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.K.Maity, for the opposite party

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply