Under section 1(3) to bring Section 51 of the HGST Act (provisions related to TDS) into force with effect from 01.10.2018 under HGST Act, 2017

Under section 1(3) to bring Section 51 of the HGST Act (provisions related to TDS) into force with effect from 01.10.2018 under HGST Act, 2017
86/GST-2 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Notification
The 18th September, 2018
No.86/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017) and in supersession of the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification no. 84/ST-2, dated the 22nd September, 2017 except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Governor of Haryana hereby appoints the 1st day of October,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Governor of Haryana appoints the 1st day of October, 2018, as the date on which the provisions of section 52 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall come into force

Governor of Haryana appoints the 1st day of October, 2018, as the date on which the provisions of section 52 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall come into force
87/GST-2 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Notification
The 18th September, 2018
No.87/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., Bharti Airtel Limited, M/s Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ras Polytex Pvt. Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. L

M/s Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., Bharti Airtel Limited, M/s Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ras Polytex Pvt. Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail Ltd., M/s. Navyug Airconditioning And M/s. Proactive Plast Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of U.P. And 02 Others And State Of U.P. And 3 Others
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1261 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 193 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 18-9-2018
Writ Tax No. – 587 of 2018, 454 of 2018, 455 of 2018, 462 of 2018, 458 of 2018, 559 of 2018, 560 of 2018, 478 of 2018, 464 of 2018, 551 of 2018, 87 of 2018
GST
Sudhir Agarwal And Ifaqat Ali Khan, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Praveen Kumar, Atul Gupta,Utkarsh Malviya, Nishant Mishra, Bipin Kumar Pandey,Aditya Pandey, Ritvik Upadhya,Vinod Kumar Upadhya, Nishant Mishra,Vipin Kumar Kushwaha, Praveen Kumar, Nishant Mishra,Tanmay Sadh
F

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 21st March 2018 passed by Assistant Commissioner, State Commercial Tax, Mobile Squad, Unit-I, Shamli in purported exercise of powers under Section 129 (1) of UPGST Act, 2017 on the allegation that in respect of goods transported by Vehicle No. DL-1LW-5527, aforesaid authority has reason to believe that for evasion of State Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred to as “SGST”) goods have been transported by said vehicle. Estimated value of goods constituting machines and parts, mentioned in the order is Rs. 9,85,000/-. Petitioner M/s. Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited has transported six loading/unloading machines from its manufacturing unit situated at Thane, (State of Maharashtra) through two tax invoices dated 16.03.2018, to its Ghaziabad office, for the purpose of being used at Warehouse of M/s. Alstom Manufacturing India Pvt. Limited, Saharanpur as inter unit stock. Aforesaid goods were transporte

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssistant Commissioner, requiring petitioner to show cause up to 28.03.2018 as to why tax and penalty of Rs. 1,87,300/- may not be imposed upon the petitioner. The aforesaid order of seizure has been challenged on the ground that mistake was unintentional, Assistant Commissioner has no jurisdiction to pass order of seizure as there is no requirement of carrying any other E-Way Bill under U.P.G.S.T Act, 2017 and Rules framed thereunder.
(II) Writ Tax No. 454 of 2018
3. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. LG Electronics India Limited assailing interception memo dated 15.03.2018, seizure order dated 16.03.2018 and show cause notice dated 16.03.2018 issued by Assistant Commissioner, State Commercial Tax Division Mobile Squad III, Sonbhadra. This writ petition has also challenged Notification dated 21.07.2017 issued by State of U.P. making carrying on E-Way Bill-01 for import of goods worth Rs. 50,000/- from out side the State in State of U.P. mandatory, and also letters dated 06.02.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HR3SV0769 against G.R. No. 3001-3002 dated 14.03.2018 issued by Transporter to petitioner. Tax invoices issued in respect to aforesaid goods were numbered as STNAKW2018647, STNAKW2018648 and STNAKW2018649 dated 13.03.2018. All the requisite details of transportation of said goods were mentioned in receipts issued by Transporter. Requisite documents were with driver of vehicle. The vehicle was intercepted by Mobile Squad Team of Uttar Pradesh Commercial Tax Division, (hereinafter referred to as “UPCTD”) and detained at Raparganj, District Sonbhadra by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad III. Interception memo dated 15.03.2018 at 10:30 A.M was issued and handed over to driver of vehicle. Memo of interception was issued on the ground that driver of vehicle was not carrying E-Way Bill 01, though in possession of original tax invoices issued by Consignor and LR receipts issued by Transporter. Thereafter physical verification was made by Assistant Commissioner who submitted report dated 16.0

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

It is duly registered under U.P.G.S.T Act 2017 having GSTIN No. 09AAACB2894GIZP.
Petitioner transferred stock by two consignments of eight boxes each, of telecom goods from its New Delhi office to Varanasi. It generated two separate E-Way Bill-01 giving details of both the transactions including details of goods and vehicle number. These two E-Way Bills numbered as 1803W177918800367522 and 1803W177918800369265 dated 12.03.2018. The goods were transported through GIR Movers Pvt. Limited by vehicle no. UP32F/N6684. Petitioner also issued invoices-Cum-Challan no. DLG25723 and DLG25727 dated 12.03.2018 for two transactions after charging Integrated Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred to as “I.G.S.T Act”) at the rate of 18%.
When goods were in transit from Delhi to Varanasi, the vehicle in which they were being transported i.e. UP32F/N6684, broke down.
Hence goods were transferred to another vehicle no. DL1GC/3360 at Hathras. Aforesaid vehicle DL1GC/3360 while crossing Commercia

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

thereunder.
The mechanism of E-Way Bill under Central Goods and Service Tax Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Rules 2017”) have not been implemented by Central Government. Hence, E-Way Bill alongwith goods were not carried by Transporter and that cannot be a ground for seizure or imposition of penalty. Hence, there is no violation of any provisions of IGST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017 or the Rules framed thereunder. Therefore, provisions of section 129 (1) of UPGST Act cannot be invoked against petitioner. UPGST Act 2017 cannot transgress upon field occupied by IGST Act 2017 and Notification issued under Rule 129 is beyond the power conferred by UPGST Act 2017.
(IV) Writ Tax No. 46 2 of 2018
5. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India by M/s. Guala Closures (India) Pvt., Ltd., having its Registered Office D-1, Sesa Ghor, Patto, P.O. Box No. 101, Panjim, Goa, challenging order of seizure dated 05.03.2018 and show cause notice of same date. Pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ound that State E-Way Bill- 01, was not being carried by transporter. Thereafter a seizure order was issued on 05.03.2018 alleging that without E-Way Bill- 01 goods were being transported in State of U.P. from outside U.P. A show cause notice under section 129 (3) of U.P.G.S.T. 2017 was also issued on 05.03.2018. It is also challenged on the ground that respondents have no authority to intercept goods, detain, and pass order of seizure as there was no requirement of carrying E-Way Bill- 01 and provisions of provincial Statute cannot override provisions of Central Statute.
(V) Writ Tax No. 458 of 2018
6. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. RAS Polytex Pvt. Ltd having its manufacturing unit E-II, Ramnagar, Industrial Area, Chandauli (State of U.P.). It has assailed seizure order dated 09.03.2018 passed by Deputy Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner, Unit Chandauli and notice dated 09.03.2018 passed under section 129 (3) of U.P.G.S.T. Act 2017. It has also sought a writ of certiora

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Way Bill-01.
Seizure order was passed under section 129 (1) on 09.03.2018 and it is also mentioned that U.P. E-Way Bill was not accompanied and Central E-Way Bill dated 07.03.2018 was generated on trial basis, therefore, it was not legally acceptable. Respondent 4 also issued notice under section 129 (3) proposing imposition of tax of Rs. 1,07,460/- and penalty of same amount i.e. Rs. 1,07,460/-.
(VI) Writ Tax No. 559 of 2018 & Writ Tax No. 560 of 2018
7. Both these writ petitions have been filed by same petitioner M/s. Rimjhim Ispat Limited, having its manufacturing unit at Industrial Area, Sumerput, District Hamirpur (U.P.) and registered office at 123/360, Fazalganj, Kanpur. In Writ Petition No. 559 of 2018 seizure order dated 11.03.2018 and show cause notice issued under section 129 (3) dated 17.03.2018 have been challenged, which have been passed by Assistant Commissioner GST/State Tax, Mobile Squad, 7th Unit Kanpur. Here petitioner sold Stainless Steel Bright Bars to M/s. M.R.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ies Limited Unit-II, B-3, Site II, Loni Road Industrial, Mohan Nagar District Ghaziabad were being transported through Transporter M/s. Buland Road Transport Company by Truck no. UP78BT2199. Petitioner has generated tax invoice no. 08440 dated 28.02.2018 for goods worth Rs. 21,31,051/- which includes IGST. E-Way Bill-02 dated 28.02.2018 was also generated by petitioner giving all details. Same were intercepted and detained by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad, Kannauj on the ground that E-Way Bills had already expired. Consequently seizure order was passed on 07.03.2018 and a show cause notice under section 129 (3) were issued on the same date, proposing tax of Rs. 3,27,420/- and penalty of same amount.
(VII) Writ Tax No. 478 of 2018
9. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. Ltd., having its Unit at Industrial Area, Ghaziabad challenging, seizure order dated 19.03.2018 and show cause notice of the same date issued by Assistant Commissioner, State/Commercial

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

posing to impose tax of Rs. 1,23,764/- and equivalent amount of penalty.
(VIII) Writ Tax No. 464 of 2018
10. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., Rave Multiplex Complex, V.I.P. Road, Kanpur.
Petitioner placed an order for supply of certain goods (advertising material) to M/s. J.K. Advertising, J-10, Jahangeerpuri, New Delhi in respect of said goods. 7 invoices were prepared on 11/12.03.2018 and goods were transported through Transporter M/s. Maa Chamunda Devi Transport Service, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi, through truck no. HR55AA-0252. Transporter issued four separate GRs on 12.03.2018 and also downloaded a consolidated E-Way Bill for the aforesaid transaction from the website of Central Government on 12.03.2018.
While in transit, goods were intercepted by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad Unit, Etah, in the morning on 13.03.2018 and same were detained on the ground that E-Way Bill-01 of U.P. Government was not available alongwith goods. Aft

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for delivery at Ghaziabad. The goods were intercepted by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad, Unit-V, Noida on 24.03.2018 and detained on the ground that goods did not accompany E-Way Bill-01 prescribed under UPGST Rules 2017. A seizure order was passed on 25.03.2018 and notice under section 129 (3) was also issued on the same date proposing levy of tax of Rs. 1,54,699/- and penalty of the same amount.
(X) Writ Tax No. 87 of 2018
12. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Proactive Plast Pvt. Ltd., Plots No. 274, 275, 280, 281, Ecotech-1 Extension, Kasna, Greater Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar. He has filed this writ petition challenging seizure order dated 20.01.2018 and notice issued on same date under section 129 (1) and (3) of UPGST Act 2017.
Petitioner company is engaged in manufacture of packing material and registered under UPGST Act 2017, having GST TIN No. 09AADCP5536C1ZJ. Petitioner placed purchase order of raw material i.e. 2,500 Kg of NUCREAL AE Resin and 7,500 Kg

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under section 129 (1) and notice under section 129 (3) was also issued on the same date proposing tax of Rs. 31,17,500/- and penalty of same amount.
13. In order to give a consolidated bird eye view of details of invoices, seizure orders, show-cause notices and the amount of tax/penalty proposed, a chart is being given as under:
S. N.
Writ Petition No.
Name of petitioner
Date of invoice
Date of interception/seizure order
Date of show cause notice
Amount of tax/penalty proposed
Date of Final order
1.
587/2018
M/s Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing co. Ltd. Hapur.
16.3.18
21.3.18
21.3.18
374600/-

2.
454/2018
LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd.
13.3.18
15.3.18/16.3.18
16.3.18
2326944/-

3.
455/2018
Bharti Airtel Limited
12.3.18
14.3.18
14.3.18
2552310/-

4.
462/2018
Mrs. Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd.
23.2.18
5.3.18
5.3.
18 269378/-

5.
458/2018
M/s RAS Polytex Pvt. Ltd.
7.3.18
9.3.18
9.3.18
209520/-

6.
559/2018
Rimjhim Ispat Ltd.
8.3.18
11

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion.
(ii) Provisions of U.P.G.S.T Act 2017 will have to sub-serve to the provision of I.G.S.T Act 2017 when goods are transported in an Inter-State transaction, which is governed by I.G.S.T Act 2017.
(iii) Fault in any case is unintentional and therefore, there could have been no seizure or imposition of penalty in the exercise of powers under Section 129.
(iv) Tax having already been paid and shown in tax invoices, there is no occasion to levy tax again on aforesaid goods and it is wholly without jurisdiction and illegal.
(v) Demand of penalty is illegal since applicable tax had already been paid prior to transportation of goods in the matters where the allegation is that e-way-bill has expired.
(vi) The fact is that vehicle transporting the goods broke down hence, goods were transferred to another vehicle or after repair transportation resumed therefore delay was neither intentional nor deliberate and hence penalty is not attracted.
(vii) Notification no. 1014 dated 21.07.2017

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ll-02 shall remain valid and this prescription by Commissioner is ultra-vires and beyond the power conferred upon him as it is not contemplated either under the Act or the Rules or even Notification dated 21 July, 2017 issued by State Government.
Prescription of time period of validity of e-way-bill-02 could have been done only by the State Government and not the Commissioner and this power exercised by Commissioner vide circular dated 09th August, 2017 is wholly ultra-vires.
(ix) Rule 138 confers no power upon State Government to subdelegate power to Commissioner.
(x) Commissioner in its circular dated 09th August 2017 has prescribed time period of validity for e-way-bill-01 for Inter- State movement and also for e-way-bill-02 for Intra-State movement. However, for the same distance, time period for eway- bill-02 is only 48 hours while for e-way-bill-01 it is ten days. This distinction/different period of time is clearly discriminatory and arbitrary having no rationale and nexus wi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ions on Intra-State transactions and seizure orders and notices issued are wholly without jurisdiction.
15. Per-Contra learned Standing Counsel argued that a valid Notification was issued under Section 129 and petitioners having flouted the provisions thereof, in order to give opportunity, show cause notices have been issued after passing seizure orders and the same warrant no interference.
16. We have heard Sri V.K. Upadhyay, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Praveen Kumar, Sri Nishant Mishra, Sri Ritvik Upadhyay, Sri Tanmay Sadh and Sri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for Petitioners and Sri Manish Goyal, Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents. We have also perused record of all writ petitions and relevant statutes in depth.
17. Concept of Goods and Services Tax (hereinafter referred to as “G.S.T.”) has been brought by Parliament through One Hundred and First Constitution Amendment vide “Constitution (One Hundred and First

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods and services tax,-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in Articles 246 and 254, Parliament, and, subject to clause (2), the Legislature of every State, have power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax imposed by the Union or by such State.
(2) Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax where the supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of Inter-state trade or commerce.
Explanation.- The provisions of this article, shall, in respect of goods and services tax referred to in clause (5) of Article- 279-A take effect from the date recommended by the Goods and Services Tax Council.”
“269-A. Levy and collection of goods and services tax in course of inter-State trade or commerce.-(1) Goods and services tax on supplies in the course of Inter-State trade or commerce shall be levied and collected by the Government of India and such tax shall be apportioned between the Union and the States in the manner as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

services, or both takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.”
18. There are corresponding amendments in Articles 248, 249, 250, 268, 269, 270, 271, 286, 366, 368 and in Sixth and Seventh Schedules of the Constitution. Article 268-A has been omitted by the aforesaid Amendment. Provision of Constitution of Goods and Services Tax Council has been made by insertion of article 279-A.
19. Definitions of “Goods and Service Tax” and “Services” had been provided by insertion of clauses 12-A and 26-A in Article 366 and the aforesaid two clauses read as under:
“(12-A) “goods and services tax” means any tax on supply of goods, or services or both except taxes on the supply of the alcoholic liquor for human consumption;',
(26-A) “Services” means anything other than goods;”
20. Section 1 (2) of One Hundred and First Amendment Act 2016 provides that the aforesaid amendment of Constitution shall come into force on such date as Central Government may, by Notification in the Of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

person; to provide for conduct of audit of registered persons in order to verify compliance with the provisions of Act; to provide for recovery of arrears of tax using various modes including detaining and sale of goods, movable and immovable property of defaulting taxable person; to provide for powers of inspection search, seizure and arrest to the officers; to establish G.S.T Appellate Tribunal by Central Government; to make provision for penalties for contravention of the credit; to provide for an anti-profiteering clause in order to ensure that business passes on the benefit of reduced tax incidence on goods and services or both to the consumers and to provide for elaborate for transitional provisions.
23. IGST Act 2017 to some extent has replaced Central Sales Tax Act 1956. Article 269 of Constitution empowered Parliament to make laws on the taxes to be levied on the sale or purchase taking place in the course of Inter-State Trade or Commerce. Consequently Central Sales Tax 1956

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ervices on reverse charge basis; empower Central Government to grant exemptions; determination of nature of supply as to whether it is an Inter-State or an Intra-State supply; to provide elaborate provisions for determining place of supply in relation to goods or services or both; payment of tax by a supplier of online information and data-base access or retrieval services; refund of tax paid on supply of goods to tourist leaving India; apportionment of tax and settlement of funds and for transfer of input tax credit between Central Government, State Government and Union Territory; application of certain provisions of C.G.S.T Act 2017; and transitional transactions in relation to import of services made on or after appointed day.
24. Sections 1, 2, 3, 14, 20 and 22 of IGST Act 2017 were enforced w.e.f 22.06.2017. Sections 4 to 13, 16 to 19, 21, and 23 to 25 were enforced w.e.f 01.07.2017. For the purpose of execution of provisions of CGST Act 2017, Sections 3 to 5 make provisions for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ral Tax or Assistant Directors of Central Tax, and
(i) any other class of officers as it may deem fit: PROVIDED that the officers appointed under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) shall be deemed to be the officers appointed under the provisions of this Act.
4. Appointment of officers.- (1) The Board may, in addition to the officers as may be notified by the Government under Section 3, appoint such persons as it may think fit to be the officers under this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), the Board may, by order, authorise any officer referred to in clauses (a) to (h) of Section 3 to appoint officers of central tax below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of central tax for the administration of this Act.
5. Powers of officers.- (1) Subject to such conditions and limitations as the Board may impose, an officer of central tax may exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on him under this Act.
(2) An officer of central

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ubject to the conditions specified in the Notification issued under sub-section (1),
(a) where any proper officer issues an order under this Act, he shall also issue an order under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, as authorised by the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, as the case may be, under intimation to the jurisdictional officer of State tax or Union territory tax;
(b) where a proper officer under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, no proceedings shall be initiated by the proper officer under this Act on the same subject matter.
(3) Any proceedings for rectification, appeal and revision, wherever applicable, of any order passed by an officer appointed under this Act shall not lie before an officer appointed under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

therein, in relation to Integrated Tax in the same manner as CGST Act 2017 applies in relation to Section 20 of IGST Act 2017 which reads as under:-
“20. Application of provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act.- Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act relating to,-
(i) scope of supply;
(ii) composite supply and mixed supply;
(iii) time and value of supply;
(iv) input tax credit;
(v) registration;
(vi) tax invoice, credit and debit notes;
(vii) accounts and records;
(viii) returns, other than late fee;
(ix) payment of tax;
(x) tax deduction at source;
(xi) collection of tax at source;
(xii) assessment;
(xiii) refunds;
(xiv) audit;
(xv) inspection, search, seizure and arrest;
(xvi) demands and recovery;
(xvii) liability to pay in certain cases;
(xviii) advance ruling;
(xix) appeals and revision;
(xx) presumption as to documents;
(xxi) offences and penaltie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion to States) Act, if charged separately by the supplier:
PROVIDED ALSO that in cases where the penalty is leviable under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, the penalty leviable under this Act shall be the sum total of the said penalties.”
28. As we have already said section 3 of IGST Act 2017 was made effective from by 22.06.2017 and section 4 was made effective from 01.07.2017. Section 164 of CGST Act 2017 confers Rule framing power upon Central Government and pursuant thereto CGST Rules 2017 were made and enforced w.e.f 22nd June 2017. Similarly section 22 of IGST Act 2017 confers power upon Central Government to makes Rules and pursuant thereto Integrated Goods and Service Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “IGST Rules 2017”) were framed and came into force w.e.f 22.06.2017. It is a small set of Rules containing only two Rules. Rule 1 relates to short title and commencement Rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct 2017
UPGST Act 2017
129. Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit.-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, all such goods and conveyance used as a means of transport for carrying the said goods and documents relating to such goods and conveyance shall be liable to detention or seizure and after detention or seizure, shall be released,-
(a) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to one hundred per cent. of the tax payable on such goods and, in case of exempted goods, on payment of an amount equal to two per cent of the value of goods or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the goods comes forward for payment of such tax and penalty;
(b) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to the fifty per cent of the value of the goods reduc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under subsection (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard.
(5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub-section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded.
(6)Where the person transporting any goods or the owner of the goods fails to pay the amount of tax and penalty as provided in sub-section (1) within seven days of such detention or seizure, further proceedings shall be initiated in accordance with the provisions of Section 130:
PROVIDED that where the detained or seized goods are perishable or hazardous in nature or are likely to depreciate in value with passage of time, the said period of seven days may be reduced by the proper officer.
129. Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit.-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of thi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on furnishing a security equivalent to the amount payable under clause (a) or clause (b) in such form and manner as may be prescribed:
Provided that no such goods or conveyance shall be detained or seized without serving an order of detention or seizure on the person transporting the goods.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 67 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply for detention and seizure of goods and conveyances.
(3) The proper officer detaining or seizing goods or conveyances shall issue a notice specifying the tax and penalty payable and thereafter, pass an order for payment of tax and penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c).
(4) No tax, interest or penalty shall be determined under subsection (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard.
(5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub- section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded.
(6) Where the person transporting any

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ay be specified to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed.
(2) The details of documents required to be carried under subsection (1) shall be validated in such manner as may be prescribed.
(3) Where any conveyance referred to in sub-section (1) is intercepted by the proper officer at any place, he may require the person in charge of the said conveyance to produce the documents prescribed under the said sub-section and devices for verification, and the said person shall be liable to produce the documents and devices and also allow the inspection of goods.
68. Inspection of goods in movement.-
(1) The Government may require the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding such amount as may be specified to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed.
(2) The details of documents required to be carried under subsection (1) shall be validated in such manner as may be prescribed.
(3) Where an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uch time as an E-way-Bill system is developed and approved by the Council, the Government may, by Notification, specify the documents that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods shall carry while the goods are in movement or in transit storage.
33. U.P. Government in purported exercise of powers under Rule 138 of UPGST Rules 2017, issued a Notification no. KA.NI-1014/XI- 9(52)/17-UPGST-Rules-2017-Order-(31)-2017-Lucknow dated 21st July 2017 specifying documents required be carried by a person in charge of conveyance carrying any consignment of goods while in movement or in transit, storage in U.P. and it reads as under:-
“Uttar Pradesh Shashan
Sansthagat Vitta, Kar Evam Nibandhan Anubhag -2
Notification
No.-K.A.NI.-1014/XI-9(52)/17-U.P.GST Rules-2017-
Order-(31)-2017
Lucknow : 21 July 2017
In exercise of the powers under Rule 138 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 framed under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 201

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the goods during the transportation or transit storage of the goods:
a) Mentha Oil, Menthol and D.M.O.,
b) Supari,
c) Iron and Steel,
d) All types of edible oils and Vanaspathi ghee.
(3) In case of transportation of taxable goods by ecommerce operators or their authorized transporters, courier agents or agents for delivery to a person within Uttar Pradesh, the enclosed form e-way bill-03 shall be carried with such goods during the transportation of goods or transit storage within State.
(4) In case of transportation of taxable goods valuing Rs. 5,000 or more from a place outside Uttar Pradesh to a place outside the State, the form TDF-01 shall be carried with such goods during the transportation of goods or their transit storage within the State and on the exit of goods from the State, the information shall be provided in Form TDF-02.
(5) The forms mentioned in clauses (1), (2), (3) and (4) above shall be downloaded by the procedure prescribed by the Commissioner State Tax/

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7 was issued amending procedure for downloading relevant forms and it was also declared that Government Notification dated 21.07.2017 shall be effective from 16.08.2017.
35. Further in exercise of powers under Section 164 of UPGST Act 2017, U.P. Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'UPGST (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017') were published vide Notification no. KA.NI-2-1359/XI-9(42)/17- UPGST-Rules-2017-Order-(45)-2017-Lucknow dated 20th September 2017 and Rule 138 was substituted by following Sub Rule 1 to 14:-
“138. Information to be furnished prior to commencement of movement of goods and generation of e-way bill.-
(1) Every registered person who causes movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees-
(i) in relation to a supply; or
(ii) for reason other than supply; or
(iii) due to inward supply from an unregistered person.
shall, before commencement of such movement, furnish information relating to the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rate and carry the e-way bill even if the value of the consignment is less than fifty thousand rupees:
Provided further that where the movement is caused by an unregistered person either in his own conveyance or a hired one or through a transporter, he or the transporter may, at their option, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the common portal in the manner specified in this rule
Provided also that where the goods are transported for a distance of less than ten kilometers within the State or Union territory from the place of business of the consignor to the place of business of the transporter for further transportation, the supplier or the transporter may not furnish the details of conveyance in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
Explanation I. For the purposes of this sub-rule, where the goods are supplied by an unregistered supplier to a recipient who is registered, the movement shall be said to be caused by such recipient if the recipient is known at the time of commencement

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (1), where multiple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance, the transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 may be generated by him on the said common portal prior to the movement of goods.
(7) Where the consignor or the consignee has not generated FORM GST EWB-01 in accordance with the provisions of subrule
(1) and the value of goods carried in the conveyance is more than fifty thousand rupees, the transporter shall generate FORM GSTEWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case may be, and may also generate a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 on the common portal prior to the movement of goods.
(8) The information furnished in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 shall be made available to the registered supplier on the common portal who ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

able
Sr. no.
Distance
Validity period
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Upto 100 km
One day
2.
For every 100 km or part thereof thereafter
One additional day
 
Provided that the Commissioner may, by Notification, extend the validity period of e-way bill for certain categories of goods as may be specified therein: Provided further that where, under circumstances of an exceptional nature, the goods cannot be transported within the validity period of e-way bill, the transporter may generate another e-way bill after updating the details in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01
Explanation.-For the purposes of this rule, the “relevant date” shall mean the date on which the e-way bill has been generated and the period of validity shall be counted from the time at which the e-way bill has been generated and each day shall be counted as twenty-four hours.
(11) The details of e-way bill generated under sub-rule (1) shall be made available to the recipient, if registered, on the common portal, who

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d within such areas in the State and for values exceeding such amount as the Commissioner of State Tax in consultation with the Chief Commissioner of Central Tax may notify.
Explanation- The facility of generation and cancellation of eway bill may also be made available through SMS.”
36. Rules 1 (2) of UPGST (4th Amendment) Rules 2017 provides that amendment in the Rules notified on 20th September 2017 shall come into force on such date as State Government may by Notification in official gazette appoint, By the aforesaid Amendment it also inserted Rules 138-A, Rule 138-B, Rule 138-C and Rule 138-D.
37. In furtherance of Rule 1 (2) of UPGST (4th Amendment) Rules 2017 read with section 164 of UPGST Act 2017 and 21 of U.P. General Clauses Act, Governor by Notification No. KA.NI-2-138/XI-9(42)/17- U.P. Act-1-2017-Order-(101)-2018 dated 30.01.2018 appointed 1st February 2018 enforcing the amendment made in the provisions at serial no. 10 and 11 of notification no. KA.NI-2-1359/XI-9(42)/1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-U.P. GST Rules-2017-Order-(45)-2017 dated 20-10-2017, shall come into force.”
38. Perhaps this mistake was noticed by Government subsequently and, therefore, it issued another Notification no. KA.NI-177/XI-9- (42)/17-UP Act-1-2017-Order-(109)-2018-Lucknow- dated 6th February 2018, whereby Notification no. KA.NI-2-138/XI-9(42)/17-UP-Act-1- 2017-Order-(101)-2018-Lucknow dated 30th January 2018 was rescinded. Notification dated 6th February 2018 reads as under:
“Notification
KA.NI.177/XI-9(42)/17-U.P. ACT-1-2017-ORDER (109)-2018,
DATED 6-2-2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services tax Act, 2017 (U.P. Act no 1 of 2017) read with section 21 of the Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 (U.P. Act no. 1 of 1904), the Governor hereby rescinds, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such rescission, the Notification no. KA.NI.-2-138/XI- 9(42)/17-U.P.Act-l-2017-Order-(101)-2018 dated 30-1-2018.”
39. Before 06.02.2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e common portal along with such other information as may be required at the common portal and a unique number will be generated on the said portal:
Provided that where goods are sent by a principal located in one State to a job worker located in any other State, the e-way bill shall be generated by tie principal irrespective of the value of the consignment:
Provided further that where handicraft goods are transported from one State in another by a person who has been exempted from the requirement of obtaining registration under clauses (i) and (ii) of section 24, the e-way bill shall be generated by the said person irrespective of the value of the consignment,
Explanation 1.-For the purposes of this rule, the expression “handicraft goods” has the meaning as assigned to it in Notification No. KA.NI.-2-1414/XI-9(15)/17-U.P. Act-1-2017- Order-(48)-2017 dated 27-09-2017 as amended from time to time.
Explanation 2.-For the purposes of this rule, the consignment value of goods shall be t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d date of the Railway Receipt or the Air Consignment Note or Bill of lading, as the case may be.
(3) Where the e-way bill is not generated under sub-rule (2) and the goods are handed over to a transporter for transportation by road, the registered person shall furnish the information relating to the transporter on the common portal and the e-way bill shall be generated by the transporter on the said portal on the basis of the information furnished by the registered person in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01:
Provided that the registered person or, the transporter, as the case may be may, at his option, generate and carry the e-way bill even if the value of the consignment is less than fifty thousand rupees:
Provided further that where the movement is caused by an unregistered person either in his own conveyance or a hired one or through a transporter, he or the transporter may, at their option, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the common portal in the manner specified in this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a unique e-way bill number (EBN) shall be made available to the supplier, the recipient and the transporter on the common portal. (5) Where the goods are transferred from one conveyance to another, the consigner or the recipient, who has provided information in Part- A of the FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter shall, before such transfer and further movement of goods, update the details of conveyance in the e-way bill on the common portal in FORM GST EWB-01:
Provided that where the goods are transported for a distance of less than ten kilometers within the State or Union Territory from the place of business of the transporter finally to the place of business of the consignee, the details of conveyance may not be updated in the e-way bill.
(5A) The consignor or the recipient, who has furnished the information in Part-A of FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter, may assign the e-way bill number to another registered or enrolled transporter for updating the information in Part-B of FORM G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

upees, the transporter shall generate FORM GST EWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case maybe, and may also generate a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 on the common portal prior to the movement of goods:
Provided that where the goods to be transported are supplied through an e-commerce operator, the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 may be furnished by such ecommerce operator.
(8) The information furnished in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 shall be made available to the registered supplier on the common portal who may utilize the same for furnishing details in FORM GSTR-1:
Provided that when the information has been furnished by an unregistered supplier or an unregistered recipient in FORM GST EWB-01, he shall be informed electronically, if the mobile number or the e-mail is available.
(9) Where an e-way bill has been generated under this rule, but goods are either not transported or are not transported as per the details furnis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ecified therein:
Provided further that where, under circumstances of an exceptional nature, the goods cannot be transported within the validity period of the e-way bill, the transporter may generate another e-way bill after updating the details in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
Explanation.-For the purposes of this rule, the “relevant date” shall mean the date on which the e-way bill has been generated and the period of validity shall be counted from the time at which the e-way bill has been generated and each day shall be counted as twenty-four hours.
(11) The details of e-way bill generated under sub-rule (1) shall be made available to the –
(a) supplier, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the recipient or the transporter; or
(b) recipient, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the supplier or the transporter,
on the common portal, and the supplier or the recipient, as the case

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ustoms;
(d) in respect of movement of such goods and within such areas in the State as the Commissioner of state tax, in consultation with the Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of central tax, may notify;
(e) where the goods, other than de-oiled cake, being transported are specified in the Schedule appended to Notification No.KA.NI-2-837/XI-9(47)/17-UP Act-1-2017- Order-(07)-2017 dated 30.6.2017 as amended from time to time;
(f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel; and
(g) where the goods being transported are treated as no supply under Schedule III of the Act.
Explanation- The facility of generation and cancellation of eway bill may also be made available through SMS.”
41. To complete the chain of the events, we may mention that UPGST (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules 2018 (hereinafter referred to as “(Fourteenth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST EWB-01, electronically, on the common portal along with such other information as may be required on the common portal and a unique number will be generated on the said portal:
Provided further that where the goods to be transported are supplied through an e-commerce operator or a courier agency, on an authorization received from the consignor, the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 may be furnished by such e-commerce operator or courier agency and a unique number will be generated on the said portal:
Provided also that where goods are sent by a principal located in one State or Union territory to a job worker located in any other State or Union territory, the e-way bill shall be generated either by the principal or the job worker, if registered, irrespective of the value of the consignment:
Provided also that where handicraft goods are transported from one State or Union territory to another State or Union territory by a person who has been exempted from the requirement o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tered person as a consignor or the recipient of supply as the consignee, whether in his own conveyance or a hired one or a public conveyance, by road, the said person shall generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 electronically on the common portal after furnishing information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
(2A) Where the goods are transported by railways or by air or vessel, the e-way bill shall be generated by the registered person, being the supplier or the recipient, who shall, either before or after the commencement of movement, furnish, on the common portal, the information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01:
Provided that where the goods are transported by railways, the railways shall not deliver the goods unless the eway bill required under these rules is produced at the time of delivery,
(3) Where the e-way bill is not generated under sub-rule (2) and the goods are handed over to a transporter for transportation by road, the registered person shall furnish the information relat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nsporter may not furnish the details of conveyance in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
Explanation 1- For the purposes of this sub-rule, where the goods are supplied by an unregistered supplier to a recipient who is registered, the movement shall be said to be caused by such recipient if the recipient is known at the time of commencement of the movement of goods.
Explanation 2.-The e-way bill shall not be valid for movement of goods by road unless the information in Part-B of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished except in the case of movements covered under the third proviso to sub-rule (3) and the proviso to sub-rule (5).
(4) Upon generation of the e-way bill on the common portal, a unique e-way bill number (EBN) shall be made available to the supplier, the recipient and the transporter on the common portal.
(5) Where the goods are transferred from one conveyance to another, the consignor or the recipient, who has provided information in Part A of the FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

assign the e-way bill number to another transporter.
(6) After e-way bill has been generated in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (1), where multiple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance, the transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 may be generated by him on the said common portal prior to the movement of goods.
(7) Where the consignor or the consignee has not generated the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 and the aggregate of the consignment value of goods carried in the conveyance is more than fifty thousand rupees, the transporter, except in case of transportation of goods by railways, air and vessel, shall, in respect of inter-State supply, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case may be, and may also generate a consolidated e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f the e-way bill:
Provided that an e-way bill cannot be cancelled if it has been verified in transit in accordance with the provisions of rule 138B:
Provided further that the unique number generated under sub-rule (1) shall be valid for a period of fifteen days for updation of Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
(10) An e-way bill or a consolidated e-way bill generated under this rule shall be valid for the period as mentioned in column (3) of the Table below from the relevant date, for the distance, within the country, the goods have to be transported, as mentioned in column (2) of the said Table:-
Sr. No.
Distance
Validity period
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Upto 100 km.
One day in cases other than Over Dimensional Cargo
2.
For every 100 km. or part thereof thereafter
One additional day other than Over Dimensional Cargo
3.
Upto 20 km.
One day in case of Over Dimensional Cargo
4.
For every 20 km. or part thereof thereafter
One additional day in case of Over Dimensional Cargo:

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

unit and which exceeds the dimensional limits prescribed in rule 93 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, made under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988).
(11) The details of the e-way bill generated under this rule shall be made available to the-
(a) supplier, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the recipient or the transporter; or
(b) recipient, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the supplier or the transporter,
on the common portal, and the supplier or the recipient, as the case may be, shall communicate his acceptance or rejection of the consignment covered by the e-way bill.
(12) Where the person to whom the information specified in subrule
(11) has been made available does not communicate his acceptance or rejection within seventy two hours of the details being made available to him on the common portal, or the time of delivery of goods whichever is earlier,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods, other than de-oiled cake, being transported, are specified in the Schedule appended to Notification No. KA.NI.-2-837/XI-9{47)/17-U.P.Act-l- 2017-Order-(07)-2017 dated 30-06-2017 as amended from time to time;
(f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel;
(g) where the supply of goods being transported is treated as no supply under Schedule III of the Act;
(h) where the goods are being transported-
(i) under customs bond from an inland container depot or a container freight station to a customs port, airport, air cargo complex and land customs station, or from one customs station or customs port to another customs station or customs port, or
(ii) under customs supervision or under customs seal;
(i) where the goods being transported are transit cargo from or to Nepal or Bhutan;
(j) where the goods being transported are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

updation and assignment of e-way bill shall be made available through SMS to the supplier, recipient and the transporter, as the case may be.”
42. Rule 1 (2) of 14th Amendment Rules, 2018 provides that the provisions in said Notification shall come into force on such date as State Government may by Notification in the gazette, appoint. In furtherance thereof, State Government has issued Notification no. KA.NI-2-498/XI-9(42)/17-UP-Act-1-2017-Order-(121)-2018-Lucknow dated 27.03.2018 appointing 01.04.2018 for giving effect to Rule 3 [other than sub-rule(7)] and rules 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 on (Fourteenth Amendments) Rules 2018. The said Notification reads as under:-
“Notification
KA.NI.-2-498/XI-9(42)/17-U.P. ACT-1-2017-ORDER-(121)-
2018, Lucknow Dated March 27, 2018
In exercise of the powers under sub-rule (2) of rule 1 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules, 2018 published with Notification No. KA.NI.-2-487/XI- 9(42)/17-U.P. GST Rules-2017, Order-(120)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hat till such time e-way bill system is developed and approved by GSTC, the Government may, by Notification, specify the documents that a person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods shall carry while the goods are in movement or in transit storage. This rule 138 in U.P. GST Rules, 2017 came into force on 29.06.2017. In furtherance of Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017, first Notification was issued by Governor on 21.07.2017 but this Notification also declares that Notification itself shall be effective from such date as Commissioner, State Tax/Commercial Tax may mention in the circular prescribing procedure of downloading the forms mentioned in the said Notification. Thus in furtherance of Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017, which came into force on 29.06.2017, first Notification though issued on 21.07.2017 but it was not made effective from that date and, on the contrary, it was to be declared by Commissioner State Tax/Commercial Tax. In furtherance of State Governm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

16.08.2017.
45. Then comes amendment by substitution of Rule 138 by Notification dated 20.09.2017. However, it was not made effective and operative since for the said purpose, Rule-1(2) of U.P. GST (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017 requires another Notification by State Government, appointing date of enforcement of substituted Rule 138.
This substituted Rule 138 as notified on 20.9.2017 was sought to be enforced with effect from 01.02.2018 by Notification dated 30.01.2018 but a glaring error was committed and instead of giving effect to Notification dated “20.09.2017”, it mentioned the date as “20.10.2017”.
Thus Notification dated 20.09.2017 did not come into effect and Rule 138 as sought to be substituted by Notification dated 20.09.2017 remained unenforced and inoperative. On 31.01.2018 UPGST (Thirteenth Amendment) Rules 2018, were published which came into force w.e.f. 23.1.2018, except otherwise provided in the Notification dated 31.01.2018. Substituted Rule 138 made by Notificatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.2.2018), were different than what was alleged to be non-possessed or obtained by Petitioners or Transporters, carrying goods in dispute by making reference to Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 and Commissioner's Circular dated 09.08.2017. Even the authorities concerned, it is evident, were not clear as to what are the correct Forms in these cases.
47. Further, it is not the case of respondents that the Forms consistent with Rule 138 made effective from 01.02.2018 were made available on the portal.
48. We also find that under Rule 138 (10) period of validity of e-way bill was clearly different than what was mentioned in Commissioner's Circulars dated 09.08.2017. Thus, Rule 138 as was brought in by Notification dated 31.01.2018 w.e.f. 01.02.2018 was operative during the period of transactions with which we are concerned in the present set of writ petitions, except writ petition no. 87 of 2018 which is governed by Rule 138, as initially enacted read with Government

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and, hence, adhered to compliance of provisions which stood already substituted by new provisions and earlier ones had become otiose. Insistence upon petitioners, at the time of issue of seizure memos and show cause notices to have downloaded E-way-bill 01 and/or 02 and its non compliance by referring to Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 read with Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 and also Rule 138 as substituted vide Government Notification dated 20.09.2017, though it was never imposed and made operative, was/is clearly erroneous and illegal.
Notification dated 31.01.2018 whereby Rule 138 was completely changed by substitution and made effective from 01.02.2018, it appears, escaped attention of authorities concerned, though it is this provision which had to be complied by petitioners. Unfortunately, authorities concerned have completely failed to observe the same. It appears that for the field authorities there was a gross chaos on account of q

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

matter of fact, never became operative. The first amendment by substitution of Rule 138 is by way of U.P. GST (Thirteenth Amendment) Rules 2018 vide Notification dated 31.01.2018 which came into force on 01.02.2018 and it continued upto 31.03.2018. Thereafter, it stands substituted by another Rule 138 vide U.P. GST (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules 2018, Notification dated 26.03.2018, made effective from 01.04.2018. Probably, the above pace of change derailed respondent authorities also in their understanding as to which provision has to be followed and implemented and what has to be observed/applied/obeyed by Petitioners and their Transporters. That is how impugned orders have been passed under a clear misconception of non-downloading of e-way bill 01 or 02, as the case may be, though under Rule 138, which had come into force on 01.02.2018, the Form(s) required to be downloaded by Dealers or Transporters are different.
53. In these peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, in our vie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te, provisions could not have been made by State Government of U.P. GST Act, 2017, hence Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017 read with Notification dated 21.07.2017 and Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 are ultra vires.
55. We have already discussed relevant provisions of various Statutes and it is evident that the provisions are pari materia. Officers of State are also competent for search, seizure and imposition of penalty in respect of violation of Central Enactments. Moreover, provisions relating to search and seizure are not for the purpose of imposition of a new liability but to regulate fiscal statutory provisions in order to avoid evasion of tax. Nothing has been placed on record to show that similar requirement of relevant documents was not provided by Central Government also in respect of inter-state transactions. There is also a principle that mere mention of a wrong provision will not make an order bad, if otherwise, power exists in the Statute. In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Real Value Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Ceebros Property Development, Prime Developers Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai

Real Value Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Ceebros Property Development, Prime Developers Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1149 – CESTAT CHENNAI – [2018 – TlOL – 2867 – CESTAT]
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 18-9-2018
ST/723/2010, ST/350/2010, ST/528/2010 – 42436-42438/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
For the Appellant : Shri G. Natarajan, Advocate, Shri Raghavan Ramabhadran for Appellant And Shri Ramachandra Rao, Consultant
For the Respondent : Shri A. Cletus, Addl. Commissioner (AR)
ORDER
PER BENCH
The issue involved in all these appeals being similar, they were heard together and are disposed by this common order.
2. The appellant M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd. are involved in activity of constructing commercial projects PRGT and residential projects. The appellants were issued show cause notices alleging short-payment of service tax under Commerc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Name of the Project
Allegation
Tax liability
Commercial PRGT
Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to buyers
Rs.34,38,337/-
Residential The Lords Sananda Brindavan Sujeet Surya Skanda
Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to buyers
Rs.1,07,33,392/-
Commercial PRGT Amarasri
Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to land owners
48,98,579/-
Residential Sai Brindavan
Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to land owners
Rs.15,49,944/-
 
Total
Rs.2,06,20,252/-
2.1 Another Show Cause Notice No. 570/2009 dated 20.10.2009 was also issued in respect of amount received towards construction of residential apartments and commercial complexes for the period from 1.4.2008 to 31.3.2008. It appeared to department from the nature of the services provided, that appellants are liable to pay service tax under construction of complex services or under commercial construction service in terms of section 65(105)(zzzh) and section 6

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re sold by appellant to ultimate buyers under separate agreements. Show cause notice dated 10.8.2009 was issued for the period January 2005 to August 2008 proposing to demand service tax under the category of Construction of Complex Service (CICS). After adjudication, the original authority confirmed an amount of Rs. 1,16,42,448/- holding that for the period prior to 1.6.2007, the appellant has to pay service tax under CICS and not under Works Contract Service (WCS) as the project was launched prior to 1.6.2007 and consideration was also received prior to 1.6.2007. For the period after 1.6.2007, the adjudicating authority held that Commercial or Industrial Construction Services / Construction of Residential Complex Services (RCS) were taxable even after 1.6.2007 and that appellant would have to pay under either RCS or WCS.
2.4 M/s. Ceebros Property Development is the appellant in ST/350/2010. The demand is for the period from 1.7.2007 to 28.2.2008. It was put forward by the ld. consul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of introduction of service tax on various construction services and also made various contentions, submissions in respect of the matter under appeal. The submissions and contentions of the ld. counsel can be broadly summarized as under:-
3.1 Service Tax was introduced on the following taxable services from the dates mentioned against each:
S.No
Name of the service
Section of the Finance Act, 1994
Introduced with effect from
1
Commercial or industrial construction service (CICS)
65 (105) (zzq)
01.07.2003
2
Construction of Complex Service (CCS)
65 (105) (zzzh)
16.06.2005
3
Works Contract Service (WCS)
65 (105) (zzzza)
01.06.2007
3.2 Section 65A of the Act deals with the principles of classification of services. As each of the taxable services are made taxable from different dates and the scope of abatement from value, exemption entitlements, valuation, rate of tax are based on appropriate classification of service, correct classification of service is very important.
3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Section 94 (2) of the Act. An alternative in the form of Works Contract (Composition scheme for payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007 has also been introduced to pay service tax at a lesser rate on the gross amount (including the value of transfer of property in goods).
3.5 The issue as to whether a composite contract involving provision of service as well as transfer of property in goods could be covered under CICS and CCS from the date of introduction of service tax levy on such services was, being litigated upon which was finally settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Vs. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. 2015 (39) STR 913 SC. The Apex Court has observed that in as much as section 67 of the Act, dealing with valuation of taxable services, refers to the gross amount charged for service, the services of CICS and CCS would cover only pure service activities, as any contrary view would imply that the Union Government can levy service tax on the gross amount, including the value o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er a different category of taxable service as the assesse was not at all put on notice on the new category of taxable service.
These decisions were based on various decisions of higher appellate forums, where it has been held that the show cause notice is the foundation of allegations and the adjudication should be limited to the allegations. Further, as per Section 65 A of the Act, classification of service shall be based on the specific entries and the more specific description has to be preferred. In this connection, he invited attention to CBEC's Circular 128/10/2010 Dt. 24.08.2010.
3.8 If show cause notices are issued demanding service tax under CICS / CCS, on composite contracts, involving transfer of property in goods, for the period post 01.06.2007, the said demands of service tax cannot be sustained, as these services would cover only pure service activities, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Larsen & Toubro (supra). At the stage of adjudication or appeal proce

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CS for the period post 01.06.2007 have been set aside.
a) URC Constructions Vs CCE – 2017 (50) STR 147 Tri-Chennai
b) Mantri Developers VS CCE – 2014 (36) STR 944 Tri-Bang.
c) Skyway Infra Projects VS CST – 2018-TIOL-360-CESTAT-MUM
d) Srishti Constructions VS CCE – 2018-TIOL-337-CESTAT-CHD
e) CST VS Swadeshi Construction Company – 2018-TIOL-1096-CESTAT-DEL
f) Logos Construction Pvt. Ltd. VS CST 2018 (6) TMI 1361 – CESTAT CHENNAI
3.11 In the subject appeal, all the demands confirmed are in respect of composite contracts (commercial buildings, residential buildings, service provided to buyers and service provided to landowners). If the plea that such demands under CICS and CCS for the period both prior to and post 01.06.2007 is not sustainable is upheld, there is no need to advance any further arguments specific to the projects in question.
4. The above arguments advanced by the ld. counsel Shri Natarajan was adopted by ld. counsel Shri Raghavan Ramabhadran and ld. consulta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mponent of composite contracts such as Works Contract only with effect from 1.6.2007. The definition of Commercial Constructions Service (CICS / CCS) have not undergone any change after introduction of service tax on works contracts. While pure construction services (not composite involving supply of goods) which are not in the nature of works contract would be liable to service tax, prior to 1.6.2007, those in the nature of works contract (composite involving supply of goods) would be subject to levy only with effect from 1.6.2007. Let us proceed to examine the same.
7.1 Commercial or industrial construction was made exigible to service tax by insertion of Section 65(25b) of the Finance Act with effect from 1.7.2003.
The definition when introduced read as under:-
The said definition was amended with effect from 1.7.2010 vide Notification No. 24/2010-ST dated 22.6.2010 as under:-
'25(b) commercial or industrial construction'] means –
(a) construction of a new building or a civil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing the period of dispute as under:-
'construction of complex' means –
(a) construction of a new residential complex or a part thereof; or
(b) completion and finishing services in relation to residential complex such as glazing, plastering, painting, floor and wall tiling, wall covering and wall papering, wood and metal joinery and carpentry, fencing and railing, construction of swimming pools, acoustic applications or fittings and other similar services; or
(c) repair, alteration, renovation or restoration of, or similar services in relation to, residential complex;'
7.3 “Residential Complex” was defined in section 65(91a) ibid during the disputed period as under:-
'residential complex' means any complex comprising of –
(i) a building or buildings, having more than twelve residential units;
(ii) a common area; and
(iii) any one or more of facilities or services such as park, lift, parking space, community hall, common water supply or effluent treatment system,
locat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion to the execution of a works contract, excluding works contract in respect of roads, airports, railways, transport terminals, bridges, tunnels and dams.
Explanation. – For the purposes of this sub-clause, 'works contract' means a contract wherein, –
(i) transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of such contract is leviable to tax as sale of goods, and
(ii) such contract is for the purposes of carrying out, –
(a) erection, commissioning or installation of plant, machinery, equipment or structures, whether prefabricated or otherwise, installation of electrical and electronic devices, plumbing, drain laying or other installations for transport of fluids, heating, ventilation or air-conditioning including related pipe work, duct work and sheet metal work, thermal insulation, sound insulation, fire proofing or water proofing, lift and escalator, fire escape staircases or elevators; or
(b) construction of a new building or a civil structure or a part thereof, or of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion 65(105)(zzh) ibid; 'construction services' under section 65(105)(zzq); construction of complex services under section 65(105)(zzzh) would refer only to service contracts simpliciter and not to composite works contracts; that these five taxable services only would qualify without any other element. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also observed that with introduction of works contract service as a separate taxable service, statutory mechanism to exclude the value of transfer of property of goods has been prescribed. The Apex Court held that since the Finance Act had not laid down any charge or machinery to levy and assess service tax on indivisible works contract prior to 1.6.2007, the levy on such composite works contract prior to that date has no constitutional validity.
7.6 The Larsen & Toubro (supra) judgment has been followed by this Tribunal in many numbers of cases to set aside the demand of service tax on services like commercial or industrial construction service, co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ex Court judgment in Larsen & Toubro, such composite works contract then will not be liable to service tax levy prior to 1.6.2007. On the same ratio, such composite contracts even for the period after 1.6.2007 disputed in these appeals will still have to be held as composite works contract only and not pure service simpliciter contracts that could be classified under commercial or industrial construction service, or construction of complex service. To put in another way, to merit being classified as CICS or CCS, the service provider concerned will be rendering only service simpliciter without any other element in them namely without any material or goods supply involved.
That is definitely not the case in the facts of these appeals. The activities of the appellants will therefore continue to be in the nature of composite works contract services and hence even after 1.6.2007 for the periods disputed in these appeals they cannot be brought within the fold of commercial or industrial con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ch service tax will be levied at only 2 per cent of the total value of the words contract'.
7.10 The issue was analyzed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Larsen & Toubro case (supra) and held that there can be no levy of service tax on composite contracts (involving both service and supply of goods) prior to 1.6.2007. This read together with the budget speech as above would lead to the strong conclusion that composite contracts were brought within the ambit of levy of service tax only with effect from 1.6.2007 by introduction of Section 65(105)(zzzza) i.e. Works Contract Services. As pointed out by the ld. counsels for appellants, there is no change in the definition of CICS/CCS/RCS after 1.6.2007. Therefore only those contracts which were service simpliciter (not involving supply of goods) would be subject to levy of service tax under CICS / CCS / RCS prior to 1.6.2007 and after. Our view is supported by the fact that the method / scheme for discharging service tax on the service port

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

service' was made effective, classification of aforesaid services would undergo a change in case of long term contracts even though part of the service was classified under the respective taxable service prior to 1-6-2007. This is because 'works contract' describes the nature of the activity more specifically and, therefore, as per the provisions of Section 65A of the Finance Act, 1994, it would be the appropriate classification for the part of the service provided after that date.'
7.12 Thus, for example, while construction of a new residential complex as a service simpliciter would find a place under section 65(105)(30b) of the Act, the same activity as a composite works contract will require to be brought under section 65(105)(zzzza) Explanation (c). For both these categories for the definition of residential complex, the definition given in section 65(105)(91a) will have to be adopted as discussed above will have to be taken into account.
7.13 We find sustenance in a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;ble Apex Court in M/s L&T Limited. Even in the appeal, the Revenue submitted that the respondent were engaged in construction services liable to tax under tax entry Section 65(105) (xxq). The grievance of the Revenue is with reference to commercial nature of the construction undertaken by the respondent and not on the correct classification of taxable activity.'
b. In the case of Skyway Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai – 2018-TIOL-360-CESTAT-MUM, in respect of identical issue for the period from 2005 to 2012, the Tribunal in para 7 has held as under:-
'7. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both the sides, we find that the issue falls for consideration is whether the services rendered by the appellant in respect of 52 contracts entered with various Govt. authorities need to be taxed under MMRC/CICS/ECIS or otherwise. It is on record and undisputed that the adjudicating authority has specifically held that all the 52 contracts which h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y the adjudicating authority is liable to be set aside and we do so.'
c. In the case of URC Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem – 2017 (50) STR 147, the Tribunal in paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 has held as under:-
'9. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in re Larsen & Toubro & Ors. has decided thus
'24. A close look at the Finance Act, 1994 would show that the five taxable services referred to in the charging Section 65(105) would refer only to service contracts simpliciter and not to composite works contracts. This is clear from the very language of Section 65(105) which defines 'taxable service' as 'any service provided'. All the services referred to in the said sub-clauses are service contracts simpliciter without any other element in them, such as for example, a service contract which is a commissioning and installation, or erection, commissioning and installation contract.
Further, under Section 67, as has been pointed out above, the value of a taxable ser

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

neither of the two show cause notices adduce to leviability of tax for rendering 'works contract service' On the contrary, the submission of the appellant that they had been providing 'works contract service' had been rejected by the adjudicating authority. Therefore, even as the services rendered by them are taxable for the period from 1st June, 2007 to 30th September, 2008 the narrow confines of the show cause notices do not permit confirmation of demand of tax on any service other than 'commercial or industrial construction service'. It is already established in the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the entry under Section 65(105)(zzd) is liable to be invoked only for construction simpliciter. Therefore, there is no scope for vivisection to isolate the service component of the contract.'
d. In the case of Logos Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise as reported in 2018 (6) TMI 1361, the Tribunal has held as under:-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nder works contract for this period. The only argument brought forth by the Ld. Counsel is that they have discharged an amount of around Rs. 82 lakhs under this category after the visit of the departmental officers and therefore an amount of Rs. 36,88,611/- demanded in the impugned order should be considered as having been discharged. We find merit in his argument and hence the demand of Rs. 26,88,611/- under works contract service for the period 01.04.2008 to 30.09.2008 is required to be considered as having been paid, albeit subsequent to the visit of the officers. However, the interest liability if any that arise on this amount if not paid already will have to be discharged by the appellants. So ordered.'
8. In the light of the discussions, findings and conclusions above and in particular, relying on the ratios of the case laws cited supra, we hold as under:-
a. The services provided by the appellant in respect of the projects executed by them for the period prior to 1.6.2007 bei

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ods in dispute, proposing service tax liability on the impugned services involving composite works contract, under 'Commercial or Industrial Construction Service' or 'Construction of Complex' Service, cannot therefore sustain. In respect of any contract which is a composite contract, service tax cannot be demanded under CICS / CCS for the periods also after 1.6.2007 for the periods in dispute in these appeals. For this very reason, the proceedings in all these appeals cannot sustain.
9. The next issue that arises for consideration is with regard to the demand raised for the reason that appellants did not intimate the department about their intention to opt for payment of service tax under composition scheme under Works Contract Service. The Tribunal vide Final Order No. 50871/2018 dated 6.3.2018 in the case of Vaishno Associates Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise had occasion to consider this issue and held for sole reason of not filing the intimation opting to pay ser

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re. Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.,

In Re. Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.,
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1107 – NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY – TMI
NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY – NAPA
Dated:- 18-9-2018
7/2018
GST
SH. B. N. SHARMA, CHAIRMAN, SH. J. C. CHAUHAN, TECHNICAL MEMBER, MS. R. BHAGYADEVI, TECHNICAL MEMBER
Present:-
S/Shri S. K. Jain, Shri Bharat Bhushan and 12 others on behalf of Applicant No. 1.
S/Sh. Akshat Aggarwal Assistant Commissioner and Sh. Bhupender Goyal Assistant Director (Costs) for the Applicant No. 2.
Shri Dinesh Sharma Managing Director and Shri J. P. Gaur Chief Finance Officer on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1. The brief facts of the this case are that Under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and
Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, 36 applications were filed before the Haryana State Screening Committee alleging that the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) had not been passed on to the Applicants in respect of the construction service supplied by the Respondent. The Applicants ar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

urav Kumar Aggarwal*
lavi22oct@gmail.com
23
Ravi Verma
ravics136@gmail.com
24
Sanjeev Chadha*
sanjeev_chadha35@yahoo.co.in
25
Sangam Shukla
er.sangam@gmail.com
26
Udayan Kishore Mishra*
udayankishoremishra@gmail.com
27
Manoj Jangraa
mj.jangraa@gmail.com
28
Ravi Yadav
dear.raviyadav@gmail.com
29
Zeeshan Ali Quazi*
er.zeeshan99@gmail.com
30
Sunil Kumar Jha*
lakshya.skjha@yahoo.com
31
Vikash Gupta*
vikash.gupta7878@gmail.com
32
Anoop Kumar
anoop_0406@yahoo.com
33
Rajesh Kumar*
rajeshkumar.cs06@gmail.com
34
Vikash Garg*
sperry.it@gmail.com
35
Jofin Mathew
jofinmathew@gmail.com
36
Bharat Bhushan Badesra*
bbbadesra@gmail.com
*Applicants who have filed more than one application:-
2. The above Applicants had booked flats with the Respondent under the Haryana Affordable Housing Policy 2013 (here-in-after referred to as the Policy), notified by the State of Haryana vide Notification No. PF-27/48921 dated 19.08.2013. They had alleged that before coming

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ccordingly they had filed several applications with the Haryana Screening Committee for appropriate redressal of their grievance. These applications were examined by the Screening Committee in its meeting held on 30.10.2017 and it was decided to forward these applications to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering for further necessary action. The Standing Committee in its meeting held on 07.11.2017 after confirming that prima facie there was evidence of non-compliance of the provisions of Section 171, had forwarded these applications to the Director General of safeguards (DGSG) now redesignated as Director General of Antiprofiteering(DGAP) for detailed investigation. 102 additional applications against the Respondent were also received by the Standing Committee which were also forwarded to the DGAP for investigation. The following are the names of the additional Applicants who had filed applications with the Standing Committee:-
S.No.
S/Sh.
E-mail ID
1
Rohit Yadav
rohit.yada

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ail.com
24
Praveen Kumar Sharma
praveensha77@gmail.com
25
Abhishek Yadav
abhishekyadav.nnl@gmail.com
26
Ashish Gupta
mnit.ashish2006@gmail.com
27
Rahul Rajoriya
rahul.rajoriya08@gmail.com
28
Gagan Batra
gaganbatra85@gmail.com
29
Manisha Jain
jain5175@gmail.com
30
Parvesh Chopra
parveshchopraa@gmail.com
31
Rakesh Yadav
rakeshdagar83@gmail.com
32
Sunil Saini
sainisunil92@yahoo.com
33
Raj Kumar*
rajkumar032002@yahoo.com
34
Ankur Chawla
aim.ankur@yahoo.co.in
35
Shailendra kumar
skumar_025@yahoo.co.in
36
Shalini Bisht
shaliniissarbisht@gmail.com
37
Santosh Kumar Agarwal
santoshkumar.engg@gmail.com
38
Suresh Kumar
kumarsuresh151979@gmail.com
39
Ashish srivastava
ashishdra@gmail.com
40
Pradip sarin
pradipsarin@yahoo.com
41
Rahul Yadav
rahulrao1206@gmail.com
42
Richa Jha/Priyanka Jha
richaignou95@gmail.com
43
Prem Prakash
prm185@gmail.com
44
Diwakar Singh
diwakar_chahar@yahoo.com
45
Samreen Raza
samreenraza2000@yahoo.com
46
Ra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

om
67
Pankaj Kumar
pankaj@nsk.com
68
Sandeep Sharma
sandeep.121.sharma@gmail.com
69
Kiran Mishra 
kiranmishra.2007@gmail.com
70
Saurabh Jain
saurabhs20@yahoo.com
71
Nitesh Rohilla*
nitesh.rohilla001@gmail.com
72
Rajdeep Yadav
yadav_raj7@rediffmail.com
73
Sachin Batheja
sachin.batheja@yahoo.com
74
Souvik Ghosh
souvik.ghosh@hotmail.co.in
75
Rajendra Singh Chahar/
Anuraj Singh
anuraj2110@gmail.com
76
Rajesh Kumar Jain
rajeshkjain.99@gmail.com
77
Vikas Gupta*
vikas.gupta7878@gmail.com
78
Rahul Kapoor*
rkapoor_87@rediffmail.com
79
Anil Dwivedi*
anilcs250@gmail.com
80
Amit Kumar Thakur
amitthakurlic@yahoo.in
81
Deepak Gupta
deepacgupta@gmail.com
82
Bansi Lal Mahlawat
a_Bansi.Mahlawat@airtel.com
83
Dharam Narayan Tiwari/
Shashi Vir Singh
shashivir@yahoo.com
84
Alok Kumar Singh*
alokmechboy@gmail.com
85
Mridul Verma
mridul_varma@yahoo.co.in
86
Prateek Sharma*
prateek.psharma@gmail.com
87
Paramjeet Singh
param194@gmail.com
8

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the DGAP mentions 109 Applicants out of the 138 Applicants out of which in as much as 26 have filed duplicate applications and 2 have submitted triplicate applications.
4. The DGAP in his report has stated that a notice was issued to the Respondent under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017 to submit his reply regarding the allegations that the benefit of ITC had not been passed on to the above Applicants on the purchase of the flats and also to suo moto declare the amount of profiteering. Since the Respondent failed to submit all the documents within the prescribed time extension was sought by the DGAP for completing the investigation. The Standing Committee vide it's minutes of the meeting dated 28.02.2018 had granted extension of 3 months in terms of Rule 129 (6) of the CGST Rules 2017. The DGAP has also reported that after issue of a number of summons the Respondent vide his letters dated 11.01.2018 & 19.02.18 had submitted various documents such as:-
1. Independent Auditor's Repor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent had also submitted the following data as has been depicted in the Table below to show that the ITC on Excise Duty, Countervailing Duty (CVD) and capital goods which was not available earlier was now available:-
S. No.
Nature of pre-GST Tax
Total Amount (In Rs.)
1
Excise Duty/CVD included in cost, now available as ITC
46,91,507/-
2
Credit on Capital Goods capitalized not available earlier but now available
2,05,50,719/-
3
Central Sales Tax (CST) 
For material 12,04,661/- for capital goods 24,47,563/-  Total Rs. 36,52,224/-
4
Total ITC (1+2+3)
2,88,94,450/-
5
ITC part of Cost
46,91,507/-  + 12,04,661/-=58,96,168/-
6
Cost of Sale (before interest)
50,44,57,118/-
7
Interest
44,83,288/-
8
Cost of Sale after interest (6+7)
50,89,40,406/-
9
Net Sales Realization 
1,21,79,69,823/-
10
Profit (9-8)
70,90,29,416/-
11
Percentage of ITC to Sales Realization (4 as % of 9)
2.37%
6. The report also submits that the Respondent had claimed tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lizing the ITC was being paid in cash, therefore, the ITC being allowed was not an additional benefit and the GST liability was not entirely covered by the ITC available to the Respondent. The Respondent had also claimed that he was required to pay GST on the sub-contracted work which was an additional cost to him whereas Service Tax was exempted in the past. He had further claimed that there had been tremendous increase in the prices of inputs including Steel due to which no profiteering could be alleged against him.
7. The DGAP's report also states that two of the Applicants viz. S/Sh. Sukhbir Singh and Ashutosh Fotedar vide their joint letter dated 07.05.2018 had submitted that the Respondent could charge maximum allotment rate of Rs. 4,000/- per sq. ft. carpet area which was inclusive of all costs as was prescribed under the Policy. The DGAP has also informed that one of the Applicants viz. Shri Bharat Bhushan Badesara vide his e-mail dated 12.03.2018 had submitted a copy of the '

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the two projects viz. (1) Urban Homes, Sector 70A, Gurugram and (2) Urban Homes, Sector-86, Gurugram which are being executed by the Respondent under the above Policy. He has further informed that after perusal of the application filed by the Respondent before the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and as per para 5 (i) of the Policy, it was clear that the maximum sale price per sq. feet carpet area had been fixed at Rs. 4,000/- and no minimum rate had been prescribed and hence, the Respondent could not claim that there was restriction on reducing the price. The DGAP has also submitted that the Respondent's claim that Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 relating to benefit of ITC was not attracted, as there was no reduction in the GST rate was also not acceptable because the conditions of passing on the benefit of reduced tax rate and benefit of ITC were two independent conditions and Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 was attracted if both or either of these two condition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-, the DGAP has estimated the VAT liability of the Respondent as 9% of the net taxable value (abated value) and 5.098% of the gross amount of Rs. 2,92,49,55,429/- received from the Applicants.
11. The DGAP has also reported that on examination of the GSTR-3B Returns filed by the Respondent it was revealed that the ratio between the taxable turnover and the ITC availed by him in the post-GST era w.e.f. July 2017 to February 2018 was 7.20%.
12. The DGAP has also mentioned that the Central Government had imposed 18% GST with effective rate of 12% in view of 1/3rd abatement on value on the Construction Service vide Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and the GST rate on the above Service in respect of the Affordable Housing Schemes was reduced to 8% vide Notification No. 1/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018. The DGAP has also analyzed the issue of profiteering for the pre-GST period from April 2016 to June 2017 when VAT was payable @ 5.25% and the post-GST

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

12%(GST)
8%(GST)
 
13. Based on above data the DGAP has concluded that the ITC available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period from April 2016 to June 2017 was 1.10% of the taxable turnover and during the post-GST period from July 2017 to February 2018, the ITC available to the Respondent was 7.20% of the taxable turnover and thus there was additional benefit of ITC to the tune of 6.10% (7.20%-1.10%) in the post-GST era, covering the period from July 2017 to February 2018 to the Respondent. The DGAP has also stated that for the period w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018 while the additional ITC available was 6.10% of the taxable turnover, the tax rate had increased by 6.75 % (12%-5.25%), leaving no benefit of ITC to be passed on to the Applicants. On the other hand, during the period between 25.01.2018 to February, 2018, the additional ITC of 6.10% of the taxable turnover was more than the increase in the tax rate by 2.75% (8%5.25%), requiring the Respondent to pass on the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s meeting held on 5.07.2018 had decided to hear the Applicants and the Respondent on 23.07.2018. Accordingly notices were issued to all the interested parties. On behalf of the Applicants Sh. Rajesh Kumar Jain, Bharat Bhushan and 6 other Applicants appeared and the DGAP was represented by Sh. Akshat Aggarwal Assistant Commissioner and Sh. Bhupender Goyal, Assistant Director (Costs). On the request of the parties another hearing was held on 01.08.2018 wherein S/Sh. Bharat Bhushan and R. K. Jain along with 12 other Applicants had appeared.
During both the hearings the Respondent was represented by Sh. Dinesh Sharma, Managing Director along with Sh. J. P. Gaur, Chief Finance Officer, who submitted their written submissions, on 1st August, 2018.
15. In his written submissions, the Respondent has claimed that the amounts of Rs. 50,44,57,118/- and Rs. 50,89,40,406/- mentioned in the report of the DGAP were the costs incurred on construction and not the costs of sales during the period and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and hence the initial payments on application, allotment and few periodical installments were meant for funding the above mentioned costs which on an average amounted to 40-45% of the total revenue from the Applicants. The Respondent has also claimed that the percentage of expenditure on construction was far more than the percentage of collections made from the Applicants. He has also argued that besides construction cost there were other expenses as had been mentioned above which needed to be considered before arriving at the profit margin.
16. The Respondent has further submitted that though the benefit of ITC was made available, the basic cost of the raw material had increased abnormally which had resulted in setting off of the benefit of ITC. the Respondent has also claimed that in the post-GST period basic cost of Steel was higher than the cost of Steel during the pre-GST period which had resulted in extra expenditure of Rs. 4,34,80,082/- while the ITC amounted to only Rs. 3,97,1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amount spent on construction during this period was only 25% of the total cost and hence he would receive 37.50% of total payment due during the post-GST period when he would have to spend 75% of the total cost on construction. The Respondent has also claimed that the initial consideration paid by the Applicants was towards the cost incurred/ to be incurred by him against the cost of land, licenses, approvals, administrative and financial expenses which amounted to 40-45% of the total revenue from the Applicants. He has also submitted that while calculating the ITC against the taxable value during the pre-GST period, the taxable value should be accordingly adjusted by giving effect to the above issues during the pre-GST and post-GST period and percentage of ITC should be accordingly recalculated.
19. Finally the Respondent has prayed that the following points needed to be considered by the Authority before concluding that profiteering has been done by him.
a). The taxable value shou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

They also claimed that the Respondent had recovered VAT @ 5.25% from the Applicants but had paid the Government @ 5.09%. They also requested for imposition of penalty and for early disposal of the case so that the benefit if any was provided to them before the last installment was paid to the Respondent.
22. They also claimed that the increase or decrease in cost on account of the factors other than tax rate and ITC was not to be considered for the purpose of profiteering. They further claimed that the maximum rate of Rs. 4,000/- per sq. ft. carpet area was fixed and any escalation in the cost had already been taken into account at the time of fixing of the above rate. They also submitted that any increase or decrease in the raw material prices was a market phenomenon which was not related to the GST and therefore, the cost escalation factor was not required to be considered by the Authority.
23. The Applicants have also argued that the extra liability claimed by the Respondent on a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er, 2017 to February, 2018. This ITC was approximately Rs. 8.70 Crores and was utilized to the extent of Rs. 5.40 Crores for payment of GST by him. They also pleaded that the Respondent was fully aware that the ITC should have been passed on to the buyers after re-calibrating the price, which had not been done deliberately by him which attracted penal provisions under the anti-profiteering law.
25. The Applicants have also attached copies of the e-mail dated 14.07.2018 and reminders dated 21.07.2018 & 26.07.2018 sent by their Association to the Respondent requesting him to extend the benefit of ITC which the Respondent had failed to respond to.
26. Finally the applicants have alleged that during the period between 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018 the benefit which had accrued to the Respondent was 6.1% as per the calculations given below:-
Re-calibrated rate – Rs. 4,207 (Rs.3,756 + 12% GST)
Already billed and collected rate – Rs. 4,480 (including 12% GST) Effective rate to be returned to t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing the hearing held on 23rd July, 2018, the DGAP in his reply dated 1st August, 2018 has submitted that for the period before 01.07.2017 the output rate of VAT on the Respondent was 5.25% with an ITC of 1.1% and during the period between 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018, the output rate of GST was 12% but an additional ITC of 6.1% (7.2%-1.1%) was available to the Respondent, which should have been passed on to the Applicants and 12% GST should have been charged on such reduced amount and therefore, the effective output rate of tax for the Respondent would be 12% of 93.9 (100-6.1) =11.27%. He has also submitted that similarly, for the period after 25.01.2018, the output rate of GST was 8% but additional ITC of 6.1% (7.2%-1.1%) was available to the Respondent which should have been passed on to the Applicants and 8% GST should have been charged on such reduced amount and hence the effective output rate of GST for the Respondent would be 8% of 93.9 (100-6.1) =7.51%. The DGAP has admitted that th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of = 6.1% (4480-4207/4480 x 100). He has further stated that during the period between 25.01.2018 to 31.03.2018, the installment including GST should be Rs. 3756 + 8% GST= Rs. 4056/- per sq. ft., however, the Applicants had been charged Rs. 4000 + 8% GST i.e. Rs. 4320/- which came to profiteering of = 6.1% (4320-4056/4320 x 100) and hence 6.1% of the amount paid by the Applicants during the entire period from 01.07.2017 to 28.02.2018 was the profiteered amount.
29. We have carefully examined the DGAP's Report, the written and oral submissions of both the Applicants and the Respondent placed on record. The issues to be decided by the Authority are as under:-
(a.) Whether there was any violation of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 in this case?
(b.) If yes then what was the quantum of profiteering?
30. Perusal of Section 171 of the CGST Act shows that it provides as under:-
171. (1) Any reduction in rate of tax on any supply of goods or services or the benefit of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

been extended to all the goods and services which were utilized by any builder which was not available in the pre-GST era. This fact has not been denied by the Respondent. Since Section 171 not only deals with passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax but also deals with passing on the benefit of ITC therefore the contention made by the Respondent is legally not correct to the extent that there had been increase in the rate of tax from 5.25% to 12% and then 8% and no benefit could be passed on by him to the Applicants as the Respondent had become entitled to claim ITC the benefit of which was required to be passed on by him to the Applicants as per the provisions of Section 171. The Respondent has also admitted that he had become eligible to claim ITC after coming in to force of the GST and hence he was liable to pass on the benefit to the Applicants.
31. It is also revealed from the submissions made by the Respondent that he was building flats and selling them to the App

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

maximum sale price for each flat would be Rs. 4000/- per sq. ft. carpet area. Therefore, the claim of the Respondent that the price was fixed at Rs. 4000/- by the Haryana Government is incorrect as he had himself made offer of selling the flats at the above rate. It is also clear from the perusal of the above para that the above price was the maximum price and there was no restriction on the Respondent to charge less price. The Respondent had chosen to collect the maximum rate fixed by the Policy and therefore his plea that the rate reduction was not possible was not correct. Moreover the rate offered by the Respondent did not include taxes and it is a fact that the Applicants had paid 5.25% VAT in the pre-GST era and GST @ 12% and 8% for the period between 01.7.2017 onwards. The Buyer's Agreement vide paras 4.1, 5.3 and 5.5 clearly indicates that the Applicants were liable to pay all the taxes as applicable. Para 5.3 of the agreement states that, “the sale consideration does not incl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ability was 9% of the net taxable value and his liability was 5.098% of the unabated gross value of Rs. 2,92,49,55,429/-. During the year 2017-18 for the first quarter the taxable turnover was Rs. 7,69,35,214/- while the output tax liability was Rs. 39,21,893/-. Thus the total taxable turnover of these two periods was Rs. 30,01,89,06,44/- while the output tax liability was Rs. 15,30,26,066/- and the ratio of ITC to the taxable turnover was 1.10%. Similarly the taxable value for the period from July 2017 to February 2018 was Rs. 1,20,78,06,878/- while the tax liability was Rs. 12,56,42,894/- and the ITC ratio to taxable turnover was 7.20%. These facts have also not been disputed by the Respondent but what was disputed was that the above ratio should be calculated taking into account the cost of construction rather than the taxable turnover. This argument does not hold good because the Policy makes it mandatory on him that he could not charge more than Rs. 4000/- per sq. ft., the price w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent has not placed any concrete facts or reasons on record to dispute the same.
33. The Respondent has pleaded that since the cost of Steel one of the major raw materials had increased this increase should have been accounted for before alleging profiteering. This argument of the Respondent is not tenable since he had himself offered the maximum price of Rs. 4000/- and there was no provision of revision of this price on the basis of escalation in the price of the raw material in the Policy. The Applicants have also rightly objected to this pleading stating that the price fluctuations were considered at the time of fixing of the rate of Rs. 4000/- per sq. ft. From the details given by the Respondent no conclusion can be arrived at without considering the cost of all the inputs and their cost since for most of the building material there had been rate rationalization and all the raw material was available without CST across the country. Since he has claimed that 75% construction had bee

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pondent, which had not been taken into consideration while fixing the cost of the flats. Therefore the contention of the Respondent that the cost factor should be taken into account is not valid and justifiable as there is no escalation clause in the Agreement and the Respondent has also availed benefit of interest on the amount paid by the Applicants.
34. One of the arguments advanced by the Respondent is that in the pre-GST regime there was no tax liability on the sub-contractors and in the post-GST era the tax levied on the sub-contractors was to be borne by the Respondent. This argument is also not tenable because the entire amount is eligible for ITC to the Respondent which has been admitted by him in his written submissions. Moreover the sub-contractors are also eligible for ITC which was not available to them earlier and on account of rationalization of tax rates many of the inputs were now available at the reduced rates.
35. From the above narration of facts it is absolutely

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lculations and submitted that the actual benefit that the Respondent has to pass on to all of them was to the extent of 6.1% for both the periods when the tax was levied @ 12% as well as when the tax was levied at @ 8%. In his subsequent report called for by the Authority from the DGAP, he has submitted the revised calculations which are reproduced below. The total amount of profiteering as calculated by the DGAP is also mentioned in the subsequent table:-
Particulars
 
Amount (in Rs.)
 Basic Sale Price Collected for both the projects (Rs.) 
 
 
Jul-17
A

Aug-17
B
72,49,48,683
Sep.17
C
1,59,171
Oct,17
D

Nov.17
E
2,58,475
Dec.17
F
2,54,237
Jan.18
G

 Total Basic Sale Price Collected for both the projects during July, 2017 to January, 2018 (Rs.) 
H= Total of A to G
72,56,20,566
GST @ 12% Collected 
I=H*12%
8,70,74,468
 Actual Amount Collected 
J=H+I
81,26,95,034
 Benefit of 6.10% of Basic Sale

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e followed by the DGAP i.e. 6.1% of profiteering and accordingly the amount of profiteering has been calculated for each type of flat to arrive at the profiteering amount for each and every buyer depending upon the type of flat he has purchased. In view of the above the Authority determines the amount of profiteering as Rs. 8,22,80,998/- for all the 2476 flats.
38. The DGAP has calculated the profiteering @ 6.1% on the base price of Rs. 4000/- per sq. ft. and accordingly calculated tax amount on the reduced payment. The calculations made by the DGAP are placed below which are correct and the Authority is in full agreement with the same:-
Head
Row
Profiteering Calculation
 
X
Calculation
GST @12%
GST @8%
Rate (Per Sq. Ft.)
A
 
4000
4000
Profiteering @6.1%
B
 
244
244
New Rate (Per Sq. Ft.)
C
A-B
3756
3756
GST @X%
D
X% of C
450.72
300.48
Total Amount to Be Charged
E
C+D
4206.72
4056.48
Amount Already Charged
F
A + X% of A
4480
4320
P

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ting the last installment along with the interest @ 18% per annum to be calculated from the date of the receipt of the excess amount from each buyer, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of this order.
41. It is evident from the above that the Respondent has denied benefit of ITC to the buyers of the flats being constructed by him under the above Policy in contravention of the provisions of Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has thus realized more price from them than he was entitled to collect and has also compelled them to pay more GST than that they were required to pay by issuing incorrect tax invoices and hence he has committed an offence under section 122 (1) (i) of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, he is liable for imposition of penalty. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice be issued to him directing him to explain why the penalty prescribed under Section 122 of the above Act read with rule 133 (3) (d) of the CGST Rules, 2017 should not be imposed on him.
42.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corre

Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corresponding State Circular No. 06/2018-GST (State) dated 19.04.2018 – reg.
11/2018 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Tripura SGST
GST – States
NO.F.1-11(8)-TAX/2015/8454-59
GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
PANDIT NEHRU COMPLEX, GURKHABASTI
AGARTALA, TRIPURA WEST, PIN-799006.
Dated, Agartala, the 18th September, 2018.
Circular No.11/2018 – GST (State)
To
The Additional Commissioner of State Tax /
Superintendent of State Tax (All)/
Inspectors of State Tax (All)
Subject: Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

49/23/2018-GST
F. No. CBEC/20/16/03/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
****
New Delhi, Dated the 21st June, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners /Commissioners of Central Tax (All) / The Principal Directors General / Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 -reg.
Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 was issued to clarify the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances.
2. In order to clarify certain issues regarding the specified procedure in this regard and in order to ensure unifor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mation relating to evasion of tax is made available subsequently. Since the requisite FORMS are not available on the common portal currently, any action initiated by the State tax officers is not being intimated to the central tax officers and vice-versa, doubts have been raised as to the procedure to be followed in such situations.
3.1 In this regard, it is clarified that the hard copies of the notices/orders issued in the specified FORMS by a tax authority may be shown as proof of initiation of action by a tax authority by the transporter/registered person to another tax authority as and when required.
3.2 Further, it is clarified that only such goods and/or conveyances should be detained/confiscated in respect of which there is a violation of the provisions of the GST Acts or the rules made thereunder.
Illustration: Where a conveyance carrying twenty-five consignments is intercepted and the person-in-charge of such conveyance produces valid e-way bills and/or other relevant docum

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corres

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corresponding State Circular No. 06/2018-GST (State) dated 19.04.2018 and Central Circular No. 49/23/2018-GST dated 21.06.2018 corresponding State Circular No. 11/2018-GST (State) dated 17.09.2018 – regarding.
12/2018 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Tripura SGST
GST – States
NO.F.1-11(8)-TAX/2015/8460-66
GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
PANDIT NEHRU COMPLEX, GURKHABASTI
AGARTALA, TRIPURA WEST, PIN-799006.
Dated, Agartala, the 18th September, 2018.
Circular No.12/2018 – GST (State)
To
The Additional Commissioner of State Tax /
Superintendent of State Tax (All)/
Inspectors of State Tax (All)
Subject: Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ces Tax Act, 2017 (Tripura Act No. 9 of 2017) for the purpose of uniformity in the implementation of the Act it is instructed to follow the clarifications issued vide Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST dated 14th September, 2018 by the Department of Revenue, GST Policy Wing.
Enclo.: Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST.
(Nagesh Kumar B, IAS)
Chief Commissioner of State Tax
Government of Tripura
Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST
CBEC/20/16/03/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
New Delhi, Dated the 14th September, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners / Commissioners of Central Tax (All) / The Principal Directors General / Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s the said issue hereunder.
3. Section 68 of the CGST Act read with rule 138A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CGST Rules') requires that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding ₹ 50,000/- should carry a copy of documents viz., invoice/bill of supply/delivery challan/bill of entry and a valid e-way bill in physical or electronic form for verification. In case such person does not carry the mentioned documents, there is no doubt that a contravention of the provisions of the law takes place and the provisions of section 129 and section 130 of the CGST Act are invocable. Further, it may be noted that the non-furnishing of information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 amounts to the e-way bill becoming not a valid document for the movement of goods by road as per Explanation (2) to rule 138(3) of the CGST Rules, except in the case where the goods are transported for a distance of upto fift

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ay not be initiated, inter alia, in the following situations:
a) Spelling mistakes in the name of the consignor or the consignee but the GSTIN, wherever applicable, is correct;
b) Error in the pin-code but the address of the consignor and the consignee mentioned is correct, subject to the condition that the error in the PIN code should not have the effect of increasing the validity period of the e-way bill;
c) Error in the address of the consignee to the extent that the locality and other details of the consignee are correct;
d) Error in one or two digits of the document number mentioned in the e-way bill;
e) Error in 4 or 6 digit level of HSN where the first 2 digits of HSN are correct and the rate of tax mentioned is correct;
f) Error in one or two digits/characters of the vehicle number.
6. In case of the above situations, penalty to the tune of ₹ 500/- each under section 125 of the CGST Act and the respective State GST Act should be imposed (Rs.1000/- under the IGST Ac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases
F.1-11(100)-TAX/GST/2017/8475-80 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Tripura SGST
GST – States
NO.F.1-11(100)-TAX/GST/2017/8475-80
GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
P.N. COMPLEX, GURKHABASTI, AGARTALA
Dated, Agartala, the 18th September, 2018.
ORDER
Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Guidelines for TDS Deduction and Deposit by DDOs under GST: Ensuring Compliance and Reducing Disputes.

Guidelines for TDS Deduction and Deposit by DDOs under GST: Ensuring Compliance and Reducing Disputes.
Circulars
GST
Guidelines for Deductions and Deposits of TDS by the DDO under GST
TMI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GOODS & SERVICES TAX (GST) – RECENT UPDATES

GOODS & SERVICES TAX (GST) – RECENT UPDATES
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 17-9-2018

New Enactments
The following GST related laws have been enacted on 30th August, 2018 which seek to amend the GST laws from a date to be notified :
* Central Goods and Service Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 – which amends CGST Act, 2017. The Act provides for certain provisions for smooth transition of existing taxpayers to new goods and services tax regime. However, the new tax regime had faced certain difficulties. One of the major inconveniences caused to the taxpayers, especially small and medium enterprises, was the process of filing return and payment of tax under the Goods and Services Tax laws. In this regard, the new return filing system envisages quarterly filing of return and tax payment for small taxpayers along with minimum paperwork.
* Integrated Goods and Service Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 – which amends IGST Act, 2018 which amends IGST Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dment Act, 2018 – which amends GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017. Section 10 of the Act provides for distribution of the amount remaining unutilised in Compensation Fund at the end of transition period between Centre and the States. As the said section doesn't provide for distribution of amount remaining unutilised in Compensation Fund at any point of time in any financial year, it has been amended.
The Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Amendment Act, 2018 provides for :
* to insert a new sub-section (3A) in section 10 of the Act so as to provide that any amount remaining unutilised in the Compensation Fund may, on the recommendations of the Council, be distributed between Centre and the States at any point of time in a financial year; and
* to provide that in case of shortfall in the amount collected in the Fund against the requirement of compensation to be released under section 7 for any two months' period, fifty percent of the same, but not exceeding

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

:
* Details of outward supplies declared during the financial year
* Details of Input Tax Credit (ITC) as declared in returns filed during the financial year
* Details of tax paid as declared in returns filed during the financial year
* Particulars of the transactions for the previous financial year declared in returns of April to September of current financial year or upto date of filing of annual return of previous financial year, whichever is earlier
* Particulars of Demands and Refunds
* Information on supplies received from composition taxpayers, deemed supply under section 143 and goods sent on approval basis
* HSN Wise Summary of outward supplies
* HSN Wise Summary of inward supplies
* Late fee payable and paid
The last date to file annual return is 31st December, 2018
Obligations for the month of September, 2018
Return/Form
Period
Due Date
GSTR 1
August, 2018
11.09.2018
GSTR-3B
August 2018
20.09.2018
GSTR 5A
August, 2018
20.09.2018
GSTR 5
Augus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d June, 2017 to July, 2018.
Declaration to claim ITC in Form GST ITC-01 can be filed till 04/10/2018
[Notification No. 42/2018- Central Tax, Dated 04-09-2018]
The time limit for making a declaration in FORM GST ITC-01 for the registered persons who have filed the application in form GST CMP-04 between March 2, 2018 and March 31, 2018 has been extended to October 4, 2018.
Filing of GST returns in Kerala extended
[Notification No. 36 to 38 /2018-CT dated 24.08.2018]
Due date for filing of GST returns GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 for July, 2018 and August, 2018 has been extended to 5th October, 2018 and 10th October, 2018 respectively and due date for filing GSTR-1 for quarter July – September 2018 has been extended upto 15th November, 2018 for taxpayers registered in Kerala, Mahe (Pondicherry) and Kodagu (Karnataka) owing to recent floods.
Refund of accumulated credit of ITC on fabrics
[Circular No. 56/30/2018-GST dated 24.08.2018]
The cotton, silk and natural fibre fabrics do not suf

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n FORM GSTR-2A as an evidence of the supply by the corresponding supplier in relation to which the input tax credit has been availed by the claimant.
* It is emphasized that the Proper Officer shall not insist on the submission of an invoice (either original or duplicate) the details of which are present in FORM GSTR-2A of the relevant period submitted by the claimant.
Recovery of arrears of wrongly availed CENVAT credit under the existing law and inadmissible transitional credit
[Circular No. 58/32/2018-GST, dated 04.09.2018]
* In Circular No. 42/16/2018-GST dated 13th April, 2018, it was clarified that the recovery of arrears arising under the existing law shall be made as central tax liability to be paid through the utilization of the amount available in the electronic credit ledger or electronic cash ledger of the registered person, and the same shall be recorded in Part II of the Electronic Liability Register.
* Since the functionality for the same is not working on the po

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Concept and Applicability of TDS and TCS provisions w.e.f. October 1, 2018

Concept and Applicability of TDS and TCS provisions w.e.f. October 1, 2018
By: – Bimal jain
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 17-9-2018

After getting deferred till September 30, 2018, the Central Government vide Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018 and Notification No. 51/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018, has appointed the 1st day of October 2018, as the date on which the provisions of Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 (i.e. Tax deduction at source) and Section 52 (i.e. Tax collection at source) shall come into force.
For easy digests, we are summarizing hereunder the gist of provisions pertaining to TDS and TCS in GST:
Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 66 of the CGST Rules, 2017
Particulars
Applicable Section/ Sub-section/ Notification
Provisions
Who is required to deduct TDS (deductor)?
Section 51(1) r.w. Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018
Fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e of TDS
Section 51(1)
TDS is to be deducted at the rate of 1% [i.e. 2% for CGST+SGST/UTGST or IGST] from the payment made or credited to the deductee
Value of supply
Explanation to Section 51(1)
For the purpose of TDS specified above, the value of supply shall be taken as the amount excluding CGST, CGST/UTGST, IGST and cess indicated in the invoice
Compulsory registration for TDS deductor
Section 24(vi)
TDS deductors, whether or not separately registered, are required to compulsorily register in GST irrespective of threshold limits.
Form for TDS deductor registration
Rule 12(1)
Form GST REG-07 – Registration started from September 18, 2017(The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council, at its 21st meeting in Hyderabad)
TDS applicants who do not have a PAN, can register on basis of TAN
Payment of TDS by deductor
Section 51(2)
The amount of TDS shall be paid to the Government by the deductor within 10 days after the end of the month in which such deduction is made.
TDS Certif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

per day from the day after the expiry of five days period until the failure is rectified, subject to a maximum amount of INR 5,000/-
[i.e. INR 2,000/- per day subject to maximum of INR 10,000/- for CGST + SGST/UTGST]
Recovery & Refund
Determination of amount in default
Section 51(7)
In accordance with Section 73 (determination of tax in non-fraud cases) or Section 74 (determination of tax in fraud cases) of the CGST Act, 2017
Refund of excess deduction
Section 51(8)
Refund to deductee arising on account of excess or erroneous deduction shall be dealt in accordance with Section 54.
No refund shall be granted if the amount deducted has been credited to electronic cash ledger of deductee.
Collection of tax at Source (TCS) under Section 52 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 67 of the CGST Rules, 2017
Particulars
Applicable Section/ Sub-section/ Notification
Provisions
Who is required to collect TCS?
Section 52(1)
Every electronic commerce operator (“operator”), not bein

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hall be done by the operator by paying the supplier, the price of the product/ services, less the amount of TDS.
Rate of TCS
Section 52(1)
TCS is to be deducted at the rate not exceeding 1% of the net value of taxable supplies of the goods/services supplied through the portal of the operator
Meaning of 'electronic commerce operator'
Section 2(45)
“Electronic commerce operator” means any person who owns, operates or manages digital or electronic facility or platform for electronic commerce
Meaning of 'electronic commerce'
Section 2(44)
“Electronic commerce” means the supply of goods or services or both, including digital products over digital or electronic network
Meaning of 'Net value of taxable supplies'
Explanation to Section 52(1)
“Net value of taxable supplies” shall mean the aggregate value of taxable supplies of goods or services or both, other than services notified under sub-section (5) of section 9, made during any month by all registered persons through the operat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the operator within 10 days after the end of the month in which such collection is made.
TCS statement
Section 52(4), 52(5) & 52(6) r.w. Rule 67(1) & 80(2)
The operator is required to furnish a monthly statement in Form GSTR-8 by the 10th of the following month.
The operator is also required to file an Annual statement in Form GSTR-9B by the 31st of December following the end of every financial year.
The operator can rectify errors in the statements filed, if any, latest by the return to be filed for the month of September, following the end of every financial year or the actual date of furnishing relevant annual statement, whichever is earlier.
ITC to supplier
Section 52(7)
The tax collected by the operator shall be credited to the cash ledger of the supplier who has supplied the goods/services through the operator. The supplier can claim credit of the tax collected and reflected in the return by the Operator in his [supplier's] electronic cash ledger.
Matching of details of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nal action under Section 122, it shall also be liable for penalty up to ₹ 25,000/-
Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavours. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Bimal Jain
FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons)
Email: bimaljain@hotmail.com
Reply By Balasubramanian Natarajan as =
Presented in a clear and lucid fashion.
Thanks a lot in presenting in a tabular form
Dated: 18-9-2018
Reply By Prasanna Kumar as =
Nice presentation. Thank you Bimal Jain.
Dated: 20-9-2018
Reply By BRIJMOHAN GOYAL as =
Dear Sir,
Require your opinion on following :
1) Is a separate Notification required for IGST law. Does the CGST notification mutatis mutandis applies (as per Sec. 20 of IGST law)
2) Whether paid or credited is actual payment/credited in bank account or credited can be inferred to be used for credited in Books of Accounts.
3)One transaction: I ask my regional office at Maharashtra to appoi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Affordable Housing Projects enjoy a 12% GST rate, with 8% after land deduction, and can claim ITC under GST Act.

Affordable Housing Projects enjoy a 12% GST rate, with 8% after land deduction, and can claim ITC under GST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
Rate of GST – ITC – The rate of tax to be levied is 12% (8% GST after deducting value of land) in case of Affordable Housing Project. If the project qualifies as an Affordable Housing Project, then registration under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana is not required to avail this benefit – The applicant will be eligible for ITC subject to fulfilment of conditions as pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases
Order No. 4/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 Central GST (CGST)
GST
CGST
CGST
F. No. 349/58/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
***
New Delhi, the 17th September, 2018
Order No. 4/2018-GST
Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the declarat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Asian Paints Ltd.

In Re: M/s. Asian Paints Ltd.
GST
2019 (1) TMI 1021 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 338 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 17-9-2018
GST-ARA-44/2018-19/B-117
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Asian Paints Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following ISSUE.
Whether following two categories of products will be classifiable under Entry 24 of Schedule IV of Notification No. 1/2017,-Central Taxes (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 liable to CGST at 14% or Entry 97 of Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017- Centr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

icant is a manufacturer and dealer in paints and other chemical based products and adhesives.
1.2. Applicant is, inter alia, in the business of the buying and selling Tile Adhesives and Tile Grouting material.
1.3. The Applicant has been classifying the below mentioned two products under 24 of Schedule IV of Notification No. 1/2017- Central Taxes (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and paying CGST thereon. The description of the products is explained below and the invoices for the products is annexed herewith in Table – 1
Table – 1
Sr. No.
Product Description
Classification adopted by NM
Invoice dated
Annexure
 
Tile Adhesive
i. Tile Adhesive for Normal Application
ii. Glass Tile Adhesive
iii. Tile – on – Tile Application
v. Tile Adhesive for Stone & Heavy Tile Application
Entry 24 of Schedule IV
 
3
 
Tile Grout
i. Cement based Tile Grout
ii. Expoxy based Tile Grout
Entry 24 of Schedule IV
 
 
1.4. The brief description of each of the above

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rced adhesives for fixing glass mosaic tiles in interiors as well as exteriors. The product is sold as free flowing powder. This product is mixed with water to form a slurry and is then applied on the surface (where tiles have to be fixed) using trowel. The said surface is then combed with notch trowel and tiles are fixed. It is used an adhesive for bonding of tiles to surface.
1.5.3. Tile-on-Tile application:
The product Tile-on-Tile Adhesive is single component Grey cement based polymer modified adhesives for fixing tiles over tiles on floors and walls in interiors as well as exteriors. The product contains special adhesives that provide excellent bonding & grabbing properties. The product is sold as free flowing powder. This product is mixed with water to form a slurry and is then applied on the surface (where tiles have to be fixed using trowel. The said surface is then combed with notch trowel and tiles are fixed. This product is used under the tiles to join the tiles together

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r modified tile grout for filling tile joints upto 5mm width. It is a specially formulated premium, fast selling, low shrinkage grout that prevents ingress of water through the joint. The compound consist of Cement, sand & Colorant.
1.6.2. The Epoxy based Tile Grout:
This product is a two-component epoxy resin based tin table grout specifically designed for use in application for ceramic tiles, vitrified tiles and stone joint where hygienic and sterile condition is expected. The compound consists Of Epoxy resin, Hardener & Colorant
1.7. The Applicant states that the above products are not manufactured by the applicant. The applicant buys the product from separate vendors and sells it under its brand name.
1.8. The Applicant states that under the erstwhile regime, the manufacturers of the Applicant were classifying the above products under Chapter Heading 3214. At this point it is relevant to note that the rate of excise duty for the Chapter Heading 3214 and the 3824 were same. F

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

esive
iii. Tile-on – Tile Application
iv. Tile Adhesive for Stone & Heavy Application
Cement, sand & polymer
2.
Tile Grout
i. Cement based Tile Grout
ii. Epoxy based Tile Grout
i. For, cement based; Cement, sand & Colorant.
ii. For, epoxy based; Epoxy resin, Hardener & Colorant.
2.2. The Applicant submits that there are two competing entries relevant for present classification of above two categories of products.
2.3. Entry 97 of Schedule III to Notification No. 1/2017-Central Taxes (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is extracted below for ready reference:
Schedule III 9%
S.No.
Chapter [Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff item
Description of Goods
1
2
3
97
3824
Prepared binders for foundry moulds or cores; chemical products and preparations of the chemical or allied industries (including those consisting of mixtures of natural products), not elsewhere specified or included
2.4. The other competing entry is Entry 24 of the Schedule IV to Notification No. 1/2017 – Central Taxes (R

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

non-refractory surfacing preparations for facades, indoor walls, floors, ceilings or the like. Thus, once it is not included in the Entry 24 of Schedule IV, it will be covered under Entry 97 of Schedule III liable to CGST at 9%.
3. The Applicant submits that even by the Chapter Notes to Customs Tariff Act and the HSN Explanatory Notes, the above two categories products are classifiable under Chapter Heading 3824:
3.1. The Applicant submits that in case of any ambiguity in classification of goods under the Notification No. 1/2017, resort shall be made to the General Explanatory Notes to the Customs Tariff Act and the HSN Explanatory Notes.
3.2. The Explanation to the above Rate Notification No. 1/2017 – Central Taxes (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is extracted below for ready reference:
Explanation.- For the purposes of this Schedule,
(i) The phrase “unit container” means a package, whether large or small (for example, tin, can, box, jar, bottle, bag, or carton, drum, barrel, or caniste

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of this notification.
3.3. In view of the Explanation (iv), the Chapter Heading under consideration shall be interpreted on the basis of rules of interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Before resorting to the Chapter Notes and Sub Heading Notes Of the Customs Tariff Act, the relevant Tariff Items Of the Customs Tariff Act are extracted below for ready reference:
(A): Relevant Extract of Chapter Heading 32 14:
Tariff Item
 
Description of goods
Unit
Rate of duty
 
 
 
 
Standard
Preferential areas
3214
 
GLAZIERS' PUTTY, GRAFTING PUTTY, RESIN CEMENTS, CAULKING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER MASTICS; PAINTERS' FILLINGS; NON-REFRACTORY SURFACING PREPARTIONS FOR FACADES, INDOOR WALLS, FLOORS, CEILINGS OR THE LIKE
 
 
 
32141000

Glaziers' putty, grafting putty, resin cements, caulking compounds and other mastics; painters' filling

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te for the above relevant Sub-Heading.
3.5. Thus, resort shall be made the Explanatory Notes of Harmonized System of Nomenclature published by the World Customs Organization, Brussels (HSN Explanatory Notes) to interpret the above relevant Sub-headings.
3.6. As per the plain reading of the HSN Explanatory Note on Chapter Heading 3214, the aforesaid two categories products does not fall under the Chapter Heading 3214. The relevant portion of the HSN Explanatory Notes is extracted below for ready reference:
32.14 – GLAZIERS' PUT, GRAITING puny, RESIN CEMENTS, CAULKING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER MASTICS; PAINTERS' FILLINGS; NONREFRACTORY SURFACING PREPARATIONS FOR FACADES, INDOOR WALLS, FLOORS, CEILINGS OR THE LIKE.
(B) NON-REFRACTORY SURFACING PREPARATIONS.
Non-refractory surfacing preparations are used on facades, indoor walls, floors and ceilings, swimming pool walls and floors, etc., to make them waterproof and improve their appearance. Generally they remain visible as the final surfa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

loors and ceilings, swimming pool walls and floors, etc. water proof and improve their appearance. Further the said non-refractory preparations contained in Chapter Heading 3214 generally remain visible as final surfacing.
3.8. In the present case, all the above two categories of products are non-refractory preparations. However, they are not used for water-proofing or improving the appearance of the wall of tiles. The said two categories products are used for bonding of the tiles either horizontally or vertically and to grout the gaps between tiles. Further in no case, the above two categories of products emerge as final visible surface. In fact, the Tile Adhesives are never used on the surface.
3.9. The Applicant relies on the decision of Hon'ble CESTAT in the case of Sika India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur – 2018-TIOL-243 CESTAT-DEL = 2017 (12) TMI 892 – CESTAT NEW DELHI wherein while deciding the classification of finished products such as cement grout, re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1975 nor the HSN Explanatory Notes defines the word “mortar”. Thus, the words not defined in the act will have to be construed based on the settled legal principles.
3.14. The Supreme Court in the case of Indo International Industries Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax, UP – (1981) 47 STC 359 (SC) =1981 (3) TMI 77 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held that in interpreting items in statutes like the Excise Acts or Sales Tax Acts, whose primary object is to raise revenue and for which purpose they classify diverse products, articles and substances resort should be had not to “the scientific and technical” meaning of the terms or expression used but to their popular meaning that is to say, the meaning attached to them by those dealing in them. Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramavatar Bhuadaiprasad Etc. Vs. Assistant Sales Tax Officer, Akola – (1961) 12 STC 286 (SC) = 1961 (3) TMI 55 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held that if a word is used in a taxing statute, it has to be understood as in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he Apex Court while holding against the revenue and in the favour of the assesse to hold that ice cream would cover the soft serve ice cream. The Apex Court held that in the absence of a Statutory definition in precise terms; words, entries and items in taxing statutes must be construed in terms of their commercial or trade understanding, or according to their popular meaning. In other words, they must be constructed in the sense that the people conversant with the subject-matter of the statute, would attribute to it.
3.17. The Applicant submits in the present case, the product is mainly used by the civil contractors and plumbers who use the above products of the Applicant company for fixing the tiles. The said contractors and plumbers use the tile adhesives as mortars for bonding the tiles with floor or the wall.
3.18. The Applicant submits that in the absence of definition of the term “mortar” under the Act, resort can also be made to the dictionary meaning of the term mortar. As h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

used for bonding acid proof brick, tils, etc. for masonry construction and for lining chemical reaction equipment
3.20. Thus, on a plain reading of the dictionary meaning of mortar, it is clear that the non-refractory tile adhesives and tile grout products sold by the applicant is used as mortar by the actual users for fixing and bonding the tiles on the walls and floorings. It is not used as a surface finishing material. Hence, the said products will be covered under the above Chapter Heading 3824 only.
Additional submissions on 08.08.2018
Brief facts:
1.1. The Applicant is a manufacturer and dealer in paints and other chemical based products and adhesives. Applicant is, inter alia, in the business of the buying and selling Tile Adhesives and Grouting material.
1.2. The Applicant has been classifying the below mentioned six products under 24 of Schedule IV of Notification No. 1/2017- Central Taxes (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and paying CGST thereon. The description of the products

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

0%
60% to 62%
Sand
47% to 48%
Not Applicable
Additives
0% to 3%
0% to 25
Pigment
Not Applicable
0% to 0.5%
Extenders
Not Applicable
32% to 34%
Total
100%
100%
1.5. Thus, it can be seen that both the above two categories of products are mainly consisting of cement. The Tile Adhesives is consisting of at least 97% of cement and sand. Cement acts as principal binder in the product “Tile Adhesive” for fixing the tiles.
1.6. Now, the brief description of the each of the Six products in detail is given below:
1.7. Tile Adhesive for Normal Application:
1.7.1. The product Tile Adhesive for Normal Application is single component cement based polymer modified adhesive for fixing tiles on floors and walls in interior as well as exteriors. The product is sold as free flowing powder. This product is mixed with water to form a Slurry and is then applied on the surface (where tiles have to be fixed) using trowel. The said surface is then combed with notch trowel and tiles are fix

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for fixing tiles over tiles on floors and walls in interiors as well as exteriors. The product contains special adhesives that provide excellent bonding & grabbing properties. The product is sold as free flowing powder. This product is mixed with water to form a slurry and is then applied on the surface (where tiles have to be fixed) using trowel. The said Surface is then combed with notch trowel and tiles are fixed. This product is used under the tiles to join the tiles together in order to provide strength to the walls, floors, etc. where the tiles are applied. It is used an adhesive for bonding of tiles.
1.10. Tile Adhesive for Stone & Heavy Tile Application:
1.10.1. The product Tile Adhesive for Stone & Heavy Tile Application is Single component white cement based polymer modified tile adhesive specially designed for heavy stone tile applications like granite, marble on internal as well as external vertical surfaces. The product is sold as free flowing powder. This product is mix

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the product manufactured from separate vendors and sells it under its brand name.
1.14. The Applicant submits that in today's date, the market is classifying the above products under two different Chapter Headings of Customs Tariff Act, namely; Chapter Heading 3214 and Chapter Heading 3824.
1.15. The Applicant states that under the erstwhile regime, the manufacturers of the Applicant were classifying the above products under Chapter Heading 3214. At this point it is relevant to note that the rate of excise duty for the Chapter Heading 3214 and the 3824 were same. Further, since the Applicant was merely a trader, the classification issue did not arise at the hands of the Applicant under the erstwhile Excise regime.
1.16. The Applicant submits that the aforesaid products have also been imported in the past under both the competing entries. Since the rate of the tax under both the entries was same under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the applicant did not face the issue of corre

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

esaid six products will be classifiable under Entry 97 of Schedule Ill liable to CGST at 9%:
2.1. The Applicant submits that above six products sold by the Applicant is non refractory chemical based preparation. The said product contains predominantly cement, sand / grit and additives mixed in powder form. The said powder is converted into slurry by adding water before application.
2.2. The above six products do not have any refractory properties and hence will fall under the non-refractory category.
2.3. The Applicant submits that there are two competing entries relevant for present classification of above six products,
2.4. Entry 97 of Schedule III to Notification No. 1/2017 – Central Taxes (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is extracted below for ready reference:
Schedule III 9%
S.No.
Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading Tariff item
Description of Goods
1
2
3
97.
3284
Prepared binders for foundry moulds or cores, chemical products and preparations of the chemical or allied industries (inc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the Schedule IV. The aforesaid six products cannot be considered as Glaziers' putty, grafting putty, resin cements, caulking compounds and other mastics; painters' fillings; non refractory surfacing preparations for facades, indoor walls, floors, ceilings or the like. It is clear that the Entry 24 covers only surfacing preparations.
2.8. The term surfacing preparations has not been defined under the said Notification or the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Once the said term is no defined under the governing laws, the said words has to be interpreted based on the settled legal principles. It is settled law that any word which is not defined under the Act will have to be first interpret by applying the common parlance theory i.e. the word has to be interpreted in the way which a common understands.
2.9. It is submitted that under the common parlance theory, surfacing preparation means something which is used on the surface as the last finishing material. The said preparations are used to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

an then set the tile or uproot the tile without damaging the tile. Thus, a tile adhesive basically is a mortar with an added capability of prolonging the period of drying and binding.
2.12. The Applicant submits that, from the above description it is clear that the Tile Adhesive is nothing but a mortar and cannot be considered as surfacing preparation. Thus, the tile adhesive cannot be classified under Chapter Heading 3214 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and consequently for the GST purpose also the said products cannot be classified under Entry 24 to Schedule IV.
2.13. Thus, once it is not included in the Entry 24 of Schedule IV, it will be covered under Entry 97 of Schedule III liable to CGST at 9% which is more specific entry than any Other entry.
2.14. Entry 97 include goods of Chapter Heading 3824 which are prepared binders, chemical products and preparations of the chemical or allied industries including those consisting of mixtures of natural products.
2.15. In the present c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

whether large or small (for example, tin, can, box, jar, bottle, bag, or carton, drum, barrel, or canister) designed to hold a pre- determined quantity or number, which is indicated on such package.
(ii) The phrase “registered brand name” means brand name or trade name, that is to say, a name or a mark, such as symbol, monogram, label, signature or invented word or writing which is used in relation to such specified goods for the purpose of indicating, or so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade between such specified goods and some person using such name or mark with or without any indication of the identity of that person, and which is registered under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
(iii) “Tariff item”, “sub-heading” “heading” and “Chapter” shall mean respectively a tariff item, heading, sub-heading and Chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).
(iv) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the said Custom

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

00

Glaziers' putty, grafting putty, resin cements, caulking compounds and other mastics; painters' fillings
kg.
10%
 
321490

Other :
 
 
 
32149010

Non-refractory surfacing preparations
kg.
10%
 
32149020

Resin cement
kg.
10%
 
32149090

Other
kg.
10%
 
(B): Relevant Extract from Chapter Heading 3824
Tariff Item
 
Description of goods
Unit
Rate of duty
 
 
 
 
Standard
Preferential areas
1
 
2
3
4
5
3824
 
PREPARED BINDERS FOR FOUNDRY MOULDS OR CORES; CHEMICAL PRODUCTS AND PREPARATIONS OF THE CHEMICAL OR ALLIED INDUSTRIES (INCLUDING THOSE CONSISTING OF MIXTURES OF NATURAL PRODUCTS), NOT ELSEWHERE SPECIFIED OR INCLUDED
 
 
 
3824 50

Non-refractory mortars and concretes:
 
 
 
3824 54 10

Concretes ready to use known as “Ready- mix Concrete (RMC)”
Kg.
10%
 
3824 50 90

Other
Kg
10%
 
 
3.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, etc., to make them waterproof and improve their appearance. Generally they remain visible as the final surfacing. This group includes:
1. Powdered preparations consisting of equal parts of plaster and sand with plasticisers.
2. Preparations in powder form based on quartz and Cement with small, quantities of added plasticisers, used for instance, after adding water, for setting wall or floor tiles.
3. Pasty preparations made by coating minerals fillers (ground marble, quartz, or a mixture of quartz and silicate, for instance) with a binder (plastics or resins), with added pigments and, where appropriate, water or solvent.
4. Liquid preparations consisting, for instance, of synthetic rubber or acrylic polymers, asbestos fibres mixed with a pigment, and water. These are applied on facades with paint brush or spray gun and form a much thicker layer than paint.
4.1. The Applicant submits that on a plain reading of the above HSN Explanatory Notes, it can be seen that the said

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oducts such as cement grout, repair mortar, repair concrete, tile adhesives, waterproofing compounding sealants for tiles, walls etc. Hon'ble CESTAT held that the above products are not of a type used for Surfacing preparations for walls, ceilings etc. It is held that the said products cannot be classified under Chapter Heading 3214.
4.5. Thus, the Applicant submits that, the above six products will not fall under Non-Refractory Surfacing Preparations contained in Chapter Heading 3214.
4.6. The Applicant submits that the above six products will fall under Chapter Heading 3824 under the Sub Heading 3824 50 relating to Non-refractory mortars and concretes.
4.6. The Applicant submits that the Chapter Notes and HSN Explanatory Notes does not provide any specific note to interpret the said Sub-Heading 3824 50.
4.7. The said Sub-heading 3824 50 contains within its ambit Non-refractory mortar and concrete. At this point is it is pertinent to note that the neither the Customs Tariff Act, 1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ommon parlance.
4.9. Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh Vs. Jaswant Singh Charan Singh – (1967) 19 STC 469 (SC) = 1967 (2) TMI 65 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA while considering the question of whether the word “coal” covers charcoal, held that the meaning of the word 'coal' in the statute as understood in its commercial or popular sense would include “charcoal”. The Apex Court upheld the decision of High Court wherein the High Court had observed that while construing entries in a statute like the Sales Tax Acts, the Court should prefer the popular meaning of the terms used in such entries and not their dictionary meanings and that so construed charcoal would be included in the word 'coal'
4.10. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Connaught Plaza Restaurant (P) Ltd. – (2012) 13 SCC 639 (SC) = 2012 (12) TMI 149 – SUPREME COURT was concerned with the question of whether the soft serve ice cream woul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ionary meaning of the term mortar. As held by the Supreme Court in Ponds India Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax, Lucknow – (2008) 15 VST 256 (SC) = 2008 (5) TMI 46 – SUPREME COURT the dictionary meaning is one of the valuable aid for legal interpretation.
4.13. Thus, the term “mortar” defined in various dictionaries is extracted below for ready reference:
Oxford Dictionary:
“A mixture of lime with cement, sand and water, used in building to bond bricks or stones.”
Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary at Pg 863:
“A type of adhesive or bonding agent that may be either inorganic or organic, soft and workable when fresh but sets to a hard, infusible solid on standing, either by hydraulic action or by chemical cross-linking. The chief ingredients of inorganic mortars are cement, lime, silica, sulfur and sodium or potassium silicate. Organic mortars are based on various synthetic resins (epoxy, phenolic, polyester and furan). All types are resistant to acids. Some (potassium silica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t submits that the products sold by the Applicant is mixture consisting of different goods such as cement, sand and additives.
5.3. Thus, the said products will be classifiable as per Rule 3 read with Rule 2(b) of the General Interpretation Rules to First Schedule. Rule 3 of the said Rules is extracted below for ready reference:
3. When by application of rule 2(b) or for any other reason, goods are, prima facie, classifiable under two or more headings, classification shall be effected as follows:
(a) The heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to headings providing a more general description. However, when two or more headings each refer to part only of the materials or substances contained in mixed or composite goods or to part only of the items in a set put up for retail sale, those headings are to be regarded as equally specific in relation to those goods, even if one of them gives a more complete or precise description of the goods.
(b) Mixtures

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iable under Chapter Heading 3824 being the last heading occurring in numerical order among those which merits equal consideration.
6. In view of the above, it is respectfully prayed that the question raised in the present advance ruling application be answered in favour of the Applicant holding that the above six products are classifiable under Entry 97 of Schedule III liable to GST at 18%.
03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
The applicant M/S Asian Paints Ltd. holder of GSTN: 27AAACA3622K12V (27760300133V/C) is a dealer manufacturing as well as trading in paint, polymers and other chemicals. Applicant has filed an application in form GST ARA-01 for advance ruling in respect of classification of goods sold by it and rate of tax applicable.
The issues involved in advance ruling are as under:
1) Correct classification of manufacturing goods i.e. “tile adhesive” and “tile grout” as per HSN code Central Excise Tar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

scription is “concretes ready to use known as readymix concrete (RMC)”. He stated that the goods manufactured by applicant is nothing but “mortars” as per tariff heading 382450 & product should fall 38245090 whose description is “other” for proving the claim Of the dealer he has given documents such as invoices, and application.
After scrutiny of documents submitted along with application, tariff heading 3824 & 3214 & description therein, primafacie it appears that applicant is manufacturer of “tile adhesive & tile grout”. Basic properties & composition of above mentioned product is as under:
1) Tile adhesive: – As per applicant tile adhesive is mixture of cements & sand and polymer i.e. methyl cellulose. This mixture is called as “polymers concrete” and the useful and for binding the surface of tile with wall. The tile adhesive act as a binder and make available maximum surface area for binding it provides adhesive strength & tensile strength to the particles.
2) Tile grout: – It i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

D BINDERS FOR FOUNDRY MOULDS OR CORES; CHEMICAL PRODUCTS AND PREPARATIONS OF THE CHEMICAL OR ALLIED INDUSTRIES (INCLUDING THOSE CONSISTING OF MIXTURES OF NATURAL PRODUCTS), NOT ELSEWHERE SPECIFIED OR INCLUDED
 
 
38241000

Prepared binders for foundry moulds or cores
kg.
10%
38243000

Non-agglomerated metal carbides mixed together or with metallic binders
kg.
10%
382440

Prepared additives for cements, mortars or concretes:
 
 
38244010

Damp proof or water proof compounds
kg.
10%
38244090

Other
kg.
10%
382450

Non-refractory mortars and concretes:
 
 
Applicant stated that tile adhesive is nothing but mixture of cement sand and polymer, which is used after adding water to make it in plaster form. So as per sub heading 38245010 it is a nothing but non refractory mortar and just like ready mix concrete and therefor products should fall under HSN Code 3824 and rare of tax should be 18%.
After scrutiny of the docu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

acing preparations are used on facades, indoor walls, floors and ceilings, swimming pool walls and floors, etc., to make them waterproof and improve their appearance. Generally they remain visible as the final surfacing. This group includes:
1) Powdered preparations consisting of equal parts of plaster and sand with plasticizers.
2) Preparations in powder form based on quartz and cement with small quantities of added plasticizers, used for instance, after adding water, for setting wall or floor tiles.
3) Pasty preparations made by coating mineral fillers (ground marble, quartz, or a mixture of quartz and silicate, for instance with a binder (plastics or resins), with added pigments and, where appropriate, water or solvent.
A plasticizer is either a non-surface active compound or an active substance added to a suspension, usually a mix, to increase the separation of particles and to prevent subsiding or clumping. It helps to improve a material's plasticity or fluidity. Plasticizers

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uilding material for residential, industrial and commercial purposes. The cement used in this concrete is rich in alumina content (aluminous cement).This is a lime-based concrete.
* Asphalt concrete – this type is used primarily for road construction. The role of cement in this case is played by bitumen, which tightly holds and binds the concrete composites in the presence of coal tar at high temperatures.
* Polymer concrete – This type is used where the cementing material is a polymer.
High temperature have the effect of weakening the bond and endangering the construction. The construction material can be cement-based or gypsum-based. Notable examples of dry mixture mortars which utilize methyl cellulose include tile adhesives, EIFS, insulting plasters, hand-troweled and machine-sprayed plaster, stucco, self-leveling flooring, extruded cement panels, skim coats, joint & crack fillers, and tile grouts. Typical usage is about 0.2% – 0.5% Of total dry powder weight for dry mixtures.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, which are squarely applicable to the products covered by heading 3214 where in rate of tax is 28 In facts the decision given below cited by the applicant supports the view express by this office.
1) Indo International Industries Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax, UP – (1981) 47 STC 359 (SC) = 1981 (3) TMI 77 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
2) Ramavatar Bhuadaiprasad Etc. Vs. Assistant Sales Tax Officer, Akola – (1961) 12 STC 286 (SC) = 1961 (3) TMI 55 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
3) Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh Vs. Jaswant Singh Charan Singh – (1967) 19 STC 469 (SC) = 1967 (2) TMI 65 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
4) Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Connaught Plaza Restaurant (P) Ltd. – (2012) 13 SCC 639 (SC) = 2012 (12) TMI 149 – SUPREME COURT
5) Supreme Court in Ponds India Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax, Lucknow – (2008) 15 VST 256 (SC) = 2008 (5) TMI 46 – SUPREME COURT
The applicant had relied upon the decisions of Hon'ble court including apex court on the principles of common

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er Unit-III, Mumbai appeared and made written submissions.
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 08.08.2018 when Sh. Rahul Thakkar, Advocate along with Sh. Hiral Raja, G. M. Taxation & Sh. Ajay Patel, Sr. Manager Taxation & Sh. Yogender Pandey appeared & made oral & written submissions. The Jurisdictional Officer was not present.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We have gone through the facts of the case, documents on record and submissions made by both, the applicant and the department.
The issue before us is a classification issue. The applicant has requested on a ruling as to whether “Tile Adhesive” (which includes Tile Adhesive for Normal Application, Glass Tile Adhesive, Tile-on-Tile Application, Tile Adhesive for Stone Heavy Tile Application) and “Tile Grout” (which includes Cement Based Tile Grout and Epoxy based Tile Grout) will be classifiable under Entry 24 of Schedule IV of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Taxes (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (Chapter Heading 3214) liabl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rer to arrive at a proper classification in respect of the goods manufactured. Just because multiple classifications attract the same rate of tax, it is not proper for a manufacturer to choose any classification that is deemed fit. The classification has to be based on the basis of a proper description of the goods.
We find that the applicant in their submissions have mentioned that the concerned products are non-refractory chemical-based preparation. Now it is seen that non-refractory preparations are covered under Chapter 3214. The applicant has submitted that in view of Explanation (iv) to the above Rate Notification No. 1/2017-C. T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 the Chapter Heading under consideration shall be interpreted on the basis of rules of interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. They have also stated that under the Customs Tariff Act, the Chapter Notes for the aforesaid Two Chapters 32 and 38 does not contain any specific Note for the above relevant

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uantities of added plasticizers, used for instance, after adding water, for setting wall or floor tiles.
(3) Pasty preparations made by coating minerals fillers (ground marble, quartz, or a mixture of quartz and silicate, for instance) with a binder (plastics or resins), With added pigments and, where appropriate, water or solvent.
(4) Liquid preparations consisting, for instance, of synthetic rubber or acrylic polymers, asbestos fibres mixed with a pigment, and water. These are applied on facades with paint brush or spray gun and form a much thicker layer than paint.
It is seen from (2) above that this group of Non refractory surfacing preparations which fall under Chapter 32.14 includes “preparations in powder form based on quartz and cement with small quantities of added plasticizers, used for instance, after adding water, for setting wall or floor tiles.”. The polymers used in the above mentioned products acts as plasticizers. As mentioned in their application the product Ti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Sri Gayathri Cashews Versus The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise,

M/s. Sri Gayathri Cashews Versus The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise,
GST
2019 (1) TMI 610 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 408 (Mad.)
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 17-9-2018
W. P. No. 23242 of 2018 And WMP No. 27125 of 2018
GST
Mr. Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu
For petitioner : Mr.P.Rajkumar
For Respondents : Mrs.R.Hemalatha Senior Standing Counsel
ORDER
The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the respondent dated 19.07.2018, rejecting the petitioner's refund claim.
2.The petitioner assessee sought refund of integrated tax to the tune of Rs. 75,67,642/- based on certain reasons and grounds raised in the application for refund, one submitted through online on 14.06.2018 and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

thout providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, the present impugned order was passed reiterating the very same reason stated in the said deficiency memo.
3.Mr.P.Rajkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when the petitioner has explained in detail as to how the deficiencies pointed out in the Memo dated 04.07.2018 are not factually correct, the respondent is not justified in reiterating the very same reasons in the impugned order, without looking into the contentions raised by the petitioner in the reply dated 13.07.2018. Apart from saying so, the learned counsel further contended that the respondent ought to have given personal hearing to the petitioner, as he has not chosen to accept the reasons st

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the refund claim, as it is for the respondent to consider and decide. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, it is evident that the respondent has chosen to pass the impugned order not only by ignoring the reply submitted by the petitioner dated 13.07.2018, filed in response to the deficiency memo dated 04.07.2018 and also in violation of the principles of natural justice, as admittedly the petitioner was not afforded with the personal hearing, even though such request was specifically made by the petitioner through their reply dated 13.07.2018.
7. Perusal of the impugned order would sho

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Gayathri Cashews Versus Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Cuddalore

Gayathri Cashews Versus Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Cuddalore
GST
2018 (12) TMI 1405 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. ST. L. 408 (Mad.)
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 17-9-2018
W. P. No. 23242 of 2018 and W. M. P. No. 27125 of 2018
GST
Mr K. Ravichandrabaabu, J.
For The Appellant : P. Rajkumar
For The Respondents : R. Hemalatha, Senior Standing Counsel
ORDER
K. Ravichandrabaabu, J.
1. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the respondent dated July 19, 2018, rejecting the petitioner's refund claim.
2. The petitioner assessee sought refund of integrated tax to the tune of Rs. 75,67,642 based on certain reasons and grounds raised in the application for refund, one submitted thr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by the respondent on July 17, 2018 and also without providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, the present impugned order was passed reiterating the very same reason stated in the said deficiency memo.
3. Mr. P. Rajkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when the petitioner has explained in detail as to how the deficiencies pointed out in the memo dated July 4, 2018 are not factually correct, the respondent is not justified in reiterating the very same reasons in the impugned order, without looking into the contentions raised by the petitioner in the reply dated July 13, 2018. Apart from saying so, the learned counsel further contended that the respondent ought to have given personal hearing to the pet

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as set out in their application for refund. This court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the refund claim, as it is for the respondent to consider and decide. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, it is evident that the respondent has chosen to pass the impugned order not only by ignoring the reply submitted by the petitioner dated July 13, 2018, filed in response to the deficiency memo dated July 4, 2018 and also in violation of the principles of natural justice, as admittedly the petitioner was not afforded with the personal hearing, even though such request was specifically made by the petitioner through their repl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Rathi Tiles Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE & CGST,

M/s Rathi Tiles Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE & CGST,
Central Excise
2018 (9) TMI 1778 – CESTAT, Delhi – TMI
CESTAT, Delhi – AT
Dated:- 17-9-2018
Appeal No. E/52061/2018-SM (Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 101(AG)/CE/JDR/2018 dated 24. 2. 2018) – Final Order No. 52994/2018
Central Excise
Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, J.
Ms. Asmita Nayak, Advocate – for the appellant
Shri P. Juneja, DR – for the respondent
Archana Wadhwa,
After hearing both the sides, I find that the appellant was engaged in import of marble slabs. During the year February 2015, the appellant was availing the small scale exemption benefit and after crossing the same, they started availing the Cenvat credit. In terms of the relevant provisions, they availed the cr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that there is no dispute about the appellant's entitlement to avail the credit of the inputs lying in stock as on the date of their crossing the exemption limit, in terms of Rule 3(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. There is also no dispute about the quantum of inputs lying in stock, either as such or as contained in final product lying in stock. The only objection of the Revenue is in terms of Rule 4(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules which permits availment of credit within a period of six months from the date of issuance of the document.
6. If the said objection of the Revenue is upheld, an assessee crossing the exemption limit on a particular date, would not be able to avail the credit, thus making the provisions of Rule 3(2), as infruct

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erpretation of both the rules leads to the above conclusion. By referring to one provision of law, the other provision cannot be made otiose, as per the settled principle of interpretation. It is not the appellant's fault that they crossed the exemption limit after the period of six months from the date of receipt of the inputs. It is also well settled principle of interpretation that a particular provision of law should not be interpreted in a manner so as to render the other provision as inapplicable or ineffective. Substantive right provided under the law cannot be denied by referring to other provision, if such substantive right is otherwise available to an assessee.
7. In such a scenario, by adopting the principles of harmonious cons

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Hyundai Motor India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai Outer Commissionerate

M/s. Hyundai Motor India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai Outer Commissionerate
Service Tax
2018 (12) TMI 866 – CESTAT CHENNAI – 2019 (28) G. S. T. L. 288 (Tri. – Chennai)
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 17-9-2018
Appeal No. ST/576/2011 – Final Order No. 42461/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri S. Muthuvenkataraman, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, ADC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The appellants are engaged in manufacture of cars and parts thereof and are registered with the Central Excise Department. They also had an independent spares parts division with separate central excise registration. In addition to manufacture of spare parts, this division used to procure parts from vendors also. The items manufactured and procured were sold by the spare parts division to their dealers. The appellants sold the spare parts business div

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e” and under “fixed assets” in the annual report of Mobis India Ltd. Based on the valuation indicated in the accounts of Mobis India Ltd., department was of the view that the amount of Rs. 425.25 crores received as consideration for the transfer of the business included transfer of goodwill also. Thus goodwill was all along part of the consideration for sale of spare parts division of appellant to Mobis India Ltd. Goodwill is intangible property and classified as intellectual property and the transfer of the same would fall within section 65(105)(zzr) of the Finance Act, 1994. Further, the same has been clarified by the Board vide Circular No.80/10/2004-ST dated 17.9.2004. Even though the value of goodwill were shown as Rs. 80.29 crores by Mobis India Ltd. in their balance sheet, the notional value of goodwill was fixed at 8.5% of the total sale consideration (Rs.425 crores) on the basis of the agreement dated 30.4.2007 and this worked out to be Rs. 33.31 crores. Thus, according to dep

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Property Right” defined in Section 65(55a) of the Finance Act, 1994 and argued that to attract levy of service tax under Section 66(55b) intellectual property right should be recognized under the intellectual property law in force in India. The transfer of such intellectual property right such as trademark, designs, patents etc. would attract the levy of service tax. He submitted that goodwill does not fall under the definition of Section 65(55a). Goodwill is an asset of fluid nature dependent on a variety of extraneous factors. In contrast to this intellectual property right, lies from well defined and is recognized by law. In Ramnik Vallabhdas Madhavani Vs. Taraben Pravinlal Madhvani reported in (2004) 1 SCC 497, it was observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that 'the term goodwill signifies the value of the business in the hands of a successor, so far as increased by the continuity of the undertaking being preserved in the shape of the right to use the old name and otherwise. It is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

llectual property law in force in India. He drew our attention to the decision of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. – 2011-TIOL-33-HC-DEL-IT and submitted that the adjudicating authority has erroneously relied upon the decision to hold that the transfer of goodwill amounts to transfer of intellectual property right. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the said case was analyzing the issue with regard to depreciation of goodwill. Thus, the goodwill in the nature of intangible asset was not the question in the said case and whether such intangible asset is entitled for depreciation was the issue that is answered by the Hon'ble High Court. Hence the said case law is not at all applicable to the facts of the present case. He relied upon the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Associated Electronics and Electrical Industries (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd. – [2016] 6 ITR-OL 471 (Kar.) to argue that in the said case the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka was dealing

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

when the intellectual property right is recognized under the law in India, would the transfer of such right be subjected to levy of service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal in the said decision has also considered the application of the Board Circular dated 17.9.2004. He therefore argued that the levy of service tax alleging transfer of goodwill cannot sustain and requires to be set aside.
2.2 The second argument put forward by the ld. counsel was that the appellant has already paid service tax in respect of consideration received as per the separate trademark licensing agreement executed on 30.4.2007 as per which Mobis India Ltd. has to pay 8.5% of their annual domestic sales to the appellant as fee for trademark license. The dispute in the present case is not with regard to the amount received by the appellant as per this agreement dated 30.4.2007. The department alleges that as per the agreement dated 26.4.2007 which is a Business Transfer Agreement, the appellant hav

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rademark licensing agreement, Mobis India Ltd. has to pay fee for use of trademark @ 8.5% of their annual domestic sales. In the present case, the value of the goodwill cannot be arrived at this rate shown in the trademark licensing agreement for the reason that there is no domestic sales of goodwill. The goodwill if any has been entirely transferred along with the ongoing business to Mobis India Ltd. That therefore the valuation itself is fully based on assumptions and requires to be set aside.
3. The ld. AR Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy supported the findings in the impugned order. He submitted that a separate agreement was entered by the appellant with Mobis India Ltd. for transfer of trademark licence. The value of goodwill was not shown separately in the Business Transfer Agreement. However, Mobis India Ltd. reflected the value of the goodwill received by them to be Rs. 80.29 crores in their balance sheet. This clearly indicates that there has been transfer of goodwill by the appella

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

if any, of goodwill would fall within the definition of „transfer of intellectual property right service‟ as defined under section 65(55b) of Finance Act,1994. For better appreciation, the said provision is reproduced as below:-
'Intellectual Property Service' is defined in Section 65(55b) of the Finance Act, as under:-
'Intellectual property service' means
(a) transferring temporarily or
(b) permitting the use or enjoyment of any intellectual property right.
'Intellectual property right' is defined under section 65(55a) of the Finance Act, 1994 as “any right to intangible property namely, trademarks, designs patents or any other similar intangible property, under any law for the time being in force, but does not include copyright”.
5.1 From the definition of intellectual property right laid in Section 65(55a), it is clear only IPR which comes under any law in force would come within the ambit of the definition. Though goodwill may be in the nature of intangible

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1994. The Hon'ble Court as an obiter dicta had observed that goodwill being an intangible asset is like all other assets patents, copyright, trademark etc. Section 65(55b) lays down that only the transfer of intellectual property which is recognized under the Indian law would be subject to levy of service tax. The Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Associated Electronics and Electrical Industries (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd. (supra), has observed that 'trademark and goodwill are two distinct separate concepts. That goodwill of business has no existence except in connection with the continuing business'.
5.2 The Tribunal in the case of Alstom T&D (supra) had occasion to analyze a similar issue wherein a trademark which was registered / recognized outside India was subject to levy of service tax under IPR service. The Tribunal relied upon various decisions and held that the transfer of such trademark which has not been recognized or registered within India will not fall within the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

use Mobis India Ltd. indicated the value of goodwill to be 80.29% in their balance sheet, the department alleges that there is transfer of goodwill and such transfer amounts to transfer of IPR. Interestingly, the valuation of the transfer of IPR service is not arrived on the basis of this value reflected in the accounts of Mobis India Ltd. But the department has based the valuation on the fees stipulated for use of trademark which is to be paid on the basis of the annual domestic sales of Mobis India Ltd. We fail to understand how the department can base this agreement to arrive at the value of goodwill when the fee for use of trademark agreed between parties to be 8.5% of annual domestic sale made by Mobis India Ltd. There is no domestic sale of good will annually. Thus, we find that such a valuation derived by the department for the goodwill is also without any logic or basis.
6. We thus hold that the demand cannot sustain. The impugned order is set aide and the appeal is allowed wi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Karnataka Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Karnataka Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(04-S/2017) No. FD 47 CSL 2017 Dated:- 17-9-2018 Karnataka SGST
GST – States
Karnataka SGST
Karnataka SGST
FINANCE SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION(4-S/2017)
No. FD 47 CSL 2017, Bengaluru, dated: 17/09/2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 164 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Karnataka Act 27 of 2017), on the recommendation of Goods and Services Tax Council, the Government of Karnataka hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely: –
1. Title and commencement.- (1) These rules may be called the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) Save as otherwise provided in these rules, they shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. Amendment of rule 22.- In the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), in rul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mendment of rule 55.- In the said rules, in rule 55, in sub-rule (5), after the words "completely knocked down condition", the words "or in batches or lots" shall be inserted.
5. Amendment of rule 89.- In the said rules, in rule 89, in sub-rule (4), for clause (E), the following clause shall be substituted, namely :-
'(E) "Adjusted Total Turnover" means the sum total of the value of-
(a) the turnover in a State or a Union territory, as defined under clause (112) of section 2, excluding the turnover of services ; and
(b) the turnover of zero-rated supply of services determined in terms of clause (D) above and non zero-rated supply of services, excluding-
(i) the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies; and
(ii) the turnover of supplies in respect of which refund is claimed under sub-rule (4A) or sub-rule (4B) or both, if any, during the relevant period'.
6. Amendment of rule 96.- In the said rules, with effect from the 23rd

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he benefit under notification No. 78/2017-Customs, dated the 13th October, 2017 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R 1272 (E), dated the 13th October, 2017 or notification No. 79/2017-Customs, dated the 13th October, 2017 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Subsection (i), vide number G.S.R 1299 (E), dated the 13th October, 2017".
7. Amendment of rule 117.- In rule 117 of the said rules,-
(i) after sub-rule (1), the following shall be inserted, namely:-
“(1A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), the Commissioner may, on the recommendations of the Council, extend the date for submitting the declaration electronically in FORM GST TRAN-I by a further period not beyond 31st March 2019, in respect of registered persons who could not submit the said declaration by the due date on account of technical difficulties on the common portal and in respect of whom the Council

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aid rules, the following FORM shall be substituted, namely :-
"FORM GST REG-20
[See rule 22(4)]
Reference No. –
Date –
To
Name
Address
GSTIN/UIN
Show Cause Notice No.
Date-
Order for dropping the proceedings for cancellation of registration
This has reference to your reply filed vide ARN – dated in response to the show cause notice referred to above. Upon consideration of your reply and/or submissions made during hearing, the proceedings initiated for cancellation of registration stands vacated for the following reasons :
<>
or
The above referred show cause notice was issued for contravention of the provisions of clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 29 of the Central Goods Services Tax Act, 2017. As you have filed all the pending returns which were due on the date of issue of the aforesaid notice, and have made full payment of tax along with applicable interest and late fee, the proceedings initiated for cancellation of registration are her

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ack from job worker to whom such goods were sent for job work; and losses and wastes :
GSTIN/State of job worker if unregistered
Challan No. issued by job worker under which goods have been received back
Date of challan issued by job worker under which goods have been received back
Description of goods
UQC
Quantity
Original challan No. under which goods have been sent for job work
Original challan date under which goods have been sent for job work
Nature of job work done by job worker
Losses & wastes
UQC
Quantity
1
2*
3*
4
5
6
7*
8*
9
10
11
(B) Details of inputs / capital goods received back from job worker other than the job worker to whom such goods were originally sent for job work ; and losses and wastes :
STIN/State of job worker if unregistered
Challan No. issued by job worker under which goods have been received back
Date of challan issued by job worker under which goods have been received back
Description of goods
UQC
Quantity
Original challan No.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s where fresh challan are required to be issued by the job worker. Otherwise, columns (2) & (3) in Table (A) and Table (B) are optional.
3. Columns (7) & (8) in Table (A), Table (B) and Table (C) may not be filled where one-to-one correspondence between goods sent for job work and goods received back after job work is not possible.
6. Verification :
I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given hereinabove is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed therefrom.
Place :
Date :
Signature
Name of Authorised Signatory ..
Designation/Status…………………”;
12. Insertion of new Forms GSTR-9, GSTR-9A, and GSTR-9C.- after FORM GSTR-8, of said rules, the following new FORMS GSTR-9, GSTR-9A, and GSTR-9C shall be inserted, namely :-
"FORM GSTR-9
(See rule 80)
Annual Return
Pt. I
Basic Details
1
Financial Year
2
GSTIN
3A
Legal Name
3B
Trade Name (if any)
Pt. II
Deta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Supplies / tax reduced through Amendments (-)
M
Sub-total (I to L above)
N
Supplies and advances on which tax is to be paid (H + M) above
5
Details of Outward supplies on which tax is not payable as declared in returns filed during the financial year
A
Zero rated supply (Export) without payment of tax
B
Supply to SEZs without payment of tax
C
Supplies on which tax is to be paid by the recipient on reverse charge basis
D
Exempted
E
Nil Rated
F
Non-GST supply
G
Sub-total (A to F above)
H
Credit Notes issued in respect of transactions specified in A to F above (-)
I
Debit Notes issued in respect of transactions specified in A to F above (+)
J
Supplies declared through Amendments (+)
K
Supplies reduced through Amendments (-)
L
Sub-Total (H to K above)
M
Turnover on which tax is not to be paid (G + L above)
N
Total Turnover (including advances) (4N + 5M – 4G above)
Pt. III
Details of ITC as declared in returns filed during the financial year
Description

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC reclaimed (other than B above) under the provisions of the Act
I
Sub-total (B to H above)
J
Difference (I – A above)
K
Transition Credit through TRAN-I (including revisions if any)
L
Transition Credit through TRAN-II
M
Any other ITC availed but not specified above
N
Sub-total (K to M above)
O
Total ITC availed (I+ N above)
7
Details of ITC Reversed and Ineligible ITC as declared in returns filed during the financial year
A
As per Rule 37
B
As per Rule 39
C
As per Rule 42
D
As per Rule 43
E
As per section 17(5)
F
Reversal of TRAN-I credit
G
Reversal of TRAN-II credit
H
Other reversals (pl. specify)
I
Total ITC Reversed (A to H above)
J
Net ITC Available for Utilization (6O – 7I)
8
Other ITC related information
A
ITC as per GSTR-2A(Table 3 & 5 thereof)




B
ITC as per sum total of 6(B) and 6(H) above

C
ITC on inward supplies (other than imports and inward supplies liable to reverse charge but includes s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ious FY whichever is earlier
Description
Taxable Value
Central Tax
State Tax/UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
Supplies / tax declared through Amendments (+) (net of debit notes)
11
Supplies / tax reduced through Amendments (-) (net of credit notes)
12
Reversal of ITC availed during previous financial year
13
ITC availed for the previous financial year
14
Differential tax paid on account of declaration in 10 & 11 above
Description
Payable
Paid
1
2
3
Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State/UT Tax
Cess
Interest
Pt. VI
Other Information
15
Particulars of Demands and Refunds
Details
Central Tax
State Tax / UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
Interest
Penalty
Late Fee / Others
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A
Total Refund claimed
B
Total Refund sanctioned
C
Total Refund Rejected
D
Total Refund Pending
E
Total demand of taxes
F
Total taxes paid in respect of E above
G
Total demands pending out of E above
16
Information on supplies received from c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n output tax liability the benefit thereof has been/will be passed on to the recipient of supply.
Signature
Name of Authorised Signatory
Designation/Staus
Place :
Date :
Instruction :-
1. Terms used :
a. GSTIN : Goods and Services Tax Identification Number
b. UQC : Unit Quantity Code
c. HSN : Harmonized System of Nomenclature Code
2. The details for the period between July 2017 to March 2018 are to be provided in this return.
3. Part II consists of the details of all outward supplies & advances received during the financial year for which the annual return is filed. The details filled in Part II is a consolidation of all the supplies declared by the taxpayer in the returns filed during the financial year. The instructions to fill Part II are as follows :
Table No.
Instructions
4A
Aggregate value of supplies made to consumers and unregistered persons on which tax has been paid shall be declared here. These will include details of supplies made through E-Commerce operator

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Aggregate value of supplies in the nature of deemed exports on which tax has been paid shall be declared here. Table 6C of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
4F
Details of all unadjusted advances i.e. advance has been received and tax has been paid but invoice has not been issued in the current year shall be declared here. Table 11A of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
4G
Aggregate value of all inward supplies (including advances and net of credit and debit notes) on which tax is to be paid by the recipient (i.e.by the person filing the annual return) on reverse charge basis. This shall include supplies received from registered persons, unregistered persons on which tax is levied on reverse charge basis. This shall also include aggregate value of all import of services. Table 3.1(d) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
4I
Aggregate value of credit notes issued in respect of B to B supplies (4B), exports (4C), supplies

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pplies made to registered persons on which tax is payable by the recipient on reverse charge basis. Details of debit and credit notes are to be mentioned separately. Table 4B of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
5D, 5E and 5F
Aggregate value of exempted, Nil Rated and Non-GST supplies shall be declared here. Table 8 of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details. The value of "no supply" shall also be declared here.
5H
Aggregate value of credit notes issued in respect of supplies declared in 5A,5B,5C, 5D, 5E and 5F shall be declared here. Table 9B of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
5I
Aggregate value of debit notes issued in respect of supplies declared in 5A,5B,5C, 5D, 5E and 5F shall be declared here. Table 9B of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
5J & 5K
Details of amendments made to exports (except supplies to SEZs) and supplies to SEZs on which tax has not been paid shall be declared here. Tabl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

basis but includes supply of services received from SEZs shall be declared here. It may be noted that the total ITC availed is to be classified as ITC on inputs, capital goods and input services. Table 4(A)(5) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details. This shall not include ITC which was availed, reversed and then reclaimed in the ITC ledger. This is to be declared separately under 6(H) below.
6C
Aggregate value of input tax credit availed on all inward supplies received from unregistered persons (other than import of services) on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis shall be declared here. It may be noted that the total ITC availed is to be classified as ITC on inputs, capital goods and input services. Table 4(A)(3) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
6D
Aggregate value of input tax credit availed on all inward supplies received from registered persons on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis shall be declared here. It may be n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

etween the total amount of input tax credit availed through FORM GSTR-3B and input tax credit declared in row B to H shall be declared here. Ideally, this amount should be zero.
6K
Details of transition credit received in the electronic credit ledger on filing of FORM GST TRAN-I including revision of TRAN-I (whether upwards or downwards), if any shall be declared here.
6L
Details of transition credit received in the electronic credit ledger after filing of FORM GST TRAN-II shall be declared here.
6M
Details of ITC availed but not covered in any of heads specified under 6B to 6L above shall be declared here. Details of ITC availed through FORM ITC-01 and FORM ITC-02 in the financial year shall be declared here.
7A, 7B, 7C, 7D 7E, 7F 7G, and 7H
Details of input tax credit reversed due to ineligibility or reversals required under rule 37, 39,42 and 43 of the CGST Rules, 2017 shall be declared here. This column should also contain details of any input tax credit reversed under sect

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ch 2018 but credit on which was availed between April to September 2018 shall be declared here. Table 4(A)(5) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
8E & 8F
Aggregate value of the input tax credit which was available in FORM GSTR-2A(table 3 & 5 only) but not availed in any of the FORM GSTR-3B returns shall be declared here. The credit shall be classified as credit which was available and not availed or the credit was not availed as the same was ineligible. The sum total of both the rows should be equal to difference in 8D.
8G
Aggregate value of IGST paid at the time of imports (including imports from SEZs) during the financial year shall be declared here.
8H
The input tax credit as declared in Table 6E shall be auto-populated here.
8K
The total input tax credit which shall lapse for the current financial year shall be computed in this row.
5. Part IV is the actual tax paid during the financial year. Payment of tax under Table 6.1 of FORM GSTR-3B may be used

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

April to September of the current financial year or date of filing of Annual Return for previous financial year, whichever is earlier shall be declared here. Table 4(B) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
13
Details of ITC for goods or services received in the previous financial year but ITC for the same was availed in returns filed for the months of April to September of the current financial year or date of filing of Annual Return for the previous financial year whichever is earlier shall be declared here. Table 4(A) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
7. Part VI consists of details of other information. The instructions to fill Part VI are as follows:
Table No.
Instructions
15A 15B,15C & 15D
Aggregate value of refunds claimed, sanctioned, rejected and pending for processing shall be declared here. Refund claimed will be the aggregate value of all the refund claims filed in the financial year and will include refunds which have been

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on (4) of Section 143 of the CGST Act shall be declared here.
16C
Aggregate value of all deemed supplies for goods which were sent on approval basis but were not returned to the principal supplier within one eighty days of such supply shall be declared here.
17 & 18
Summary of supplies effected and received against a particular HSN code to be reported only in this table. It will be optional for taxpayers having annual turnover upto ₹ 1.50 Cr. It will be mandatory to report HSN code at two digits level for taxpayers having annual turnover in the preceding year above ₹ 1.50 Cr but upto ₹ 5.00 Cr and at four digits' level for taxpayers having annual turnover above ₹ 5.00 Cr. UQC details to be furnished only for supply of goods. Quantity is to be reported net of returns. Table 12 of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up details in Table 17.
19.
Late fee will be payable if annual return is filed after the due date.
FORM GSTR-9A
(See rule 80)
Annual Retu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ies liable to reverse charge received from unregistered persons
C
Import of services
D
Net Tax Payable on (A), (B) and (C) above
8
Details of other inward supplies as declared in returns filed during the financial year
A
Inward supplies from registered persons (other than 7A above)
B
Import of Goods
Pt.III
Details of tax paid as declared in returns filed during the financial year
9
Description
Total tax payable
Paid
1
2
3
Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State/UT Tax
Cess
Interest
Late fee
Penalty
Pt.IV
Particulars of the transactions for the previous FY declared in returns of April to September of current FY or upto date of filing of annual return of previous FY whichever is earlier
Description
Turnover
Central Tax
State Tax/UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
Supplies/tax (outward) declared through Amendments (+) (net of debit notes)
11
Inward supplies liable to reverse charge declared through Amendments (+) (net of debit notes)
12
Suppli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

+)
17
Late fee payable and paid
Description
Payable
Paid
1
2
3
A
Central Tax
B
State Tax
Verification :
I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given herein above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed there from and in case of any reduction in output tax liability the benefit thereof has been/will be passed on to the recipient of supply.
Signature
Name of Authorised Signatory
Designation/Status
Place :
Date :
Instructions :
1. The details for the period between July 2017 to March 2018 shall be provided in this return.
2. Part I consists of basic details of taxpayer. The instructions to fill Part I are as follows:
Table No.
Instructions
5.
Aggregate turnover for the previous financial year is the turnover of the financial year previous to the year for which the return is being filed. For example for the annual return for FY 2017-18, the aggregate turnover of FY 2016-17 shall be entered into t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

yable on reverse charge basis shall be declared here. Table 4C, Table 5 and Table 8A of FORM GSTR-4 may be used for filling up these details.
7C
Aggregate value of all services imported during the financial year shall be declared here. Table 4D and Table 5 of FORM GSTR-4 may be used for filling up these details.
8A
Aggregate value of all inward supplies received from registered persons on which tax is payable by the supplier shall be declared here. Table 4A and Table 5 of FORM GSTR-4 may be used for filling up these details.
8B
Aggregate value of all goods imported during the financial year shall be declared here.
4. Part IV consists of the details of amendments made for the supplies of the previous financial year in the returns of April to September of the current FY or date of filling of Annual Return for previous financial year (for example in the annual return for the FY 2017-18, the transactions declared in April to September 2018 for the FY 2017-18 shall be declared),which

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ctioned means the aggregate value of all refund sanction orders. Refund pending will be the aggregate amount in all refund application for which acknowledgement has been received and will exclude provisional refunds received. These will not include details of non-GST refund claims.
15E, 15F, and 15G
Aggregate value of demands of taxes for which an order confirming the demand has been issued by the adjudicating authority has been issued shall be declared here. Aggregate value of taxes paid out of the total value of confirmed demand in 15E above shall be declared here. Aggregate value of demands pending recovery out of 15E above shall be declared here.
16A
Aggregate value of all credit reversed when a person opts to pay tax under the composition scheme shall be declared here. The details furnished in FORM ITC-03 may be used for filling up these details.
16B
Aggregate value of all the credit availed when a registered person opts out of the composition scheme shall be declared here.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d after the end of the financial year but reflected in the annual return
(+)
F
Trade Discounts accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but are not permissible under GST
(+)
G
Turnover from April 2017 to June 2017
(-)
H
Unbilled revenue at the end of Financial Year
(-)
I
Unadjusted Advances at the beginning of the Financial Year
(-)
J
Credit notes accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but are not permissible under GST
(-)
K
Adjustments on account of supply of goods by SEZ units to DTA Units
(-)
L
Turnover for the period under composition scheme
(-)
M
Adjustments in turnover under section 15 and rules thereunder
(+/-)
N
Adjustments in turnover due to foreign exchange fluctuations
(+/-)
O
Adjustments in turnover due to reasons not listed above
(+/-)
P
Annual turnover after adjustments as above
< Auto >
Q
Turnover as declared in Annual Return (GSTR9)
R
Un-Reconciled turnover (Q – P)
AT1
6
Reasons for Un – Re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(RC)
C
12%
D
12% (RC)
E
18%
F
18% (RC)
G
28%
H
28% (RC)
I
3%
J
0.25%
K
0.10%
L
Interest
M
Late Fee
N
Penalty
O
Others
P
Total amount to be paid as per tables above




Q
Total amount paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR-9)
R
Un-reconciled payment of amount
PT 1
10
Reasons for un-reconciled payment of amount
A
B
Reason 1
<< Text >>
Reason 2
<< Text >>
C
Reason 3
<< Text >>
11
Additional amount payable but not paid (due to reasons specified under Tables 6,8 and 10 above)
To be paid through Cash
Description
Taxable Value
Central tax
State tax/UT tax
Integrated tax
Cess, if applicable
1
2
3
4
5
6
5%
12%
18%
28%
3%
0.25%
0.10%
Interest
Late Fee
Penalty
Others (please specify)
Pt. IV
Reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC)
12
Reconciliation of Net Input Tax Credit (ITC)
A
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement for the State/ UT (For multi-GSTIN units under sa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

K
L
M
Employees' Cost (Salaries, wages, Bonus etc.)
Conveyance charges
Bank Charges
Entertainment charges
Stationery Expenses (including postage etc.)
Repair and Maintenance
N
Other Miscellaneous expenses
O
P
Capital goods
Any other expense 1
Q
Any other expense 2
R
Total amount of eligible ITC availed
<>
S
ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR9)
T
Un-reconciled ITC
ITC 2
15
Reasons for un-reconciled difference in ITC
A
Reason 1
<< Text >>
B
C
Reason 2
<< Text >>
Reason 3
<< Text >>
16
Tax payable on un-reconciled difference in ITC (due to reasons specified in 13 and 15 above)
Description
Amount Payable
Central Tax
State/UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
Interest
Penalty
Pt.V
Auditor's recommendation on additional Liability due to non-reconciliation
To be paid through Cash
Description
Value
Central tax
State tax/UT tax
Integrated tax
Cess, if applicable
1
2
3
4
5
6
5%
12%
18%
28%
3%
0.25%
0.10%
Input Tax Cre

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ear 2017-18. The reconciliation statement is to be filed for every GSTIN separately.
3. The reference to current financial year in this statement is the financial year for which the reconciliation statement is being filed for.
4. Part II consists of reconciliation of the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement with the turnover as declared in the Annual Return furnished in FORM GSTR-9 for this GSTIN. The instructions to fill this part are as follows :-
Table No.
Instructions
5A
The turnover as per the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. There may be cases where multiple GSTINs (State-wise) registrations exist on the same PAN. This is common for persons / entities with presence over multiple States. Such persons / entities, will have to internally derive their GSTIN wise turnover and declare the same here. This shall include export turnover (if any). It may be noted that reference to audited Annual Financial Statement includes refe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

med supply which is already part of the turnover in the audited Annual Financial Statement is not required to be included here.
5E
Aggregate value of credit notes which were issued after 31st of March for any supply accounted in the current financial year but such credit notes were reflected in the annual return (GSTR-9)shall be declared here.
5F
Trade discounts which are accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but on which GST was liveable(being not permissible) shall be declared here.
5G
Turnover included in the audited Annual Financial Statement for April 2017 to June 2017 shall be declared here.
5H
Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting during the current financial year but GST was not payable on such revenue in the same financial year shall be declared here.
5I
Value of all advances for which GST has not been paid but the same has been recognized as revenue in the audited Annual Financial

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ported in the audited Annual Financial Statement due to difference in valuation of supplies shall be declared here.
5N
Any difference between the turnover reported in the Annual Return (GSTR9) and turnover reported in the audited Annual Financial Statement due to foreign exchange fluctuations shall be declared here.
5O
Any difference between the turnover reported in the Annual Return (GSTR9) and turnover reported in the audited Annual Financial Statement due to reasons not listed above shall be declared here.
5Q
Annual turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be declared here. This turnover may be derived from Sr. No. 5N, 10 and 11 of Annual Return (GSTR 9).
6
Reasons for non-reconciliation between the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement and turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be specified here.
7
The table provides for reconciliation of taxable turnover from the audited annual turnover after adjustments with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be declared here.
8
Reasons for non-reconciliation between adjusted annual taxable turnover as derived from Table 7E above and the taxable turnover declared in Table 7F shall be specified here.
5. Part III consists of reconciliation of the tax payable as per declaration in the reconciliation statement and the actual tax paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR9). The instructions to fill this part are as follows :-
Table No.
Instructions
9
The table provides for reconciliation of tax paid as per reconciliation statement and amount of tax paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR 9). Under the head labelled "RC", supplies where tax was paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient (i.e. the person for whom reconciliation statement has been prepared) shall be declared.
9P
The total amount to be paid as per liability declared in Table 9A to 9O is auto populated here.
9Q
The amount payable as declared in Table 9 of the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here. It shou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f persons / entities having presence over multiple States.
12B
Any ITC which was booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement of earlier financial year(s)but availed in the ITC ledger in the financial year for which the reconciliation statement is being filed for shall be declared here. This shall include transitional credit which was booked in earlier years but availed during Financial Year 2017-18.
12C
Any ITC which has been booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement of the current financial year but the same has not been credited to the ITC ledger for the said financial year shall be declared here.
12D
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of accounts as derived from values declared in Table 12A, 12B and 12C above will be auto-populated here.
12E
Net ITC available for utilization as declared in Table 7J of Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here.
13
Reasons for non-reconciliation of ITC as per audited Annual Financial Statement or bo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

various expenses declared in Table 14R and ITC declared in Table 14S shall be specified here.
16
Any amount which is payable due to reasons specified in Table 13 and 15 above shall be declared here.
7. Part V consists of the auditor's recommendation on the additional liability to be discharged by the taxpayer due to non-reconciliation of turnover or non-reconciliation of input tax credit. The auditor shall also recommend if there is any other amount to be paid for supplies not included in the Annual Return. Any refund which has been erroneously taken and shall be paid back to the Government shall also be declared in this table. Lastly, any other outstanding demands which is recommended to be settled by the auditor shall be declared in this Table.
8. Towards, the end of the reconciliation statement taxpayers shall be given an option to pay their taxes as recommended by the auditor.
PART – B- CERTIFICATION
I. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder:
1.
2.
3.
3. (a) *I/we report the following observations/ comments / discrepancies / inconsistencies; if any :
………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………….
3. (b) *I/we further report that, –
(A) *I/we have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit/ information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit were not provided/partially provided to us.
(B) In *my/our opinion, proper books of account *have/have not been kept by the registered person so far as appears from*my/ our examination of the books.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

llip;………………………………………
(b) ……………………………………………………………………………………
(c) ……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………….&hell

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ame and address of the assessee with GSTIN) was conducted by M/s. …………………………………………..………. (full name and address of auditor along with status), bearing membership number in pursuance of the provisions of the …………………………….Act, and *I/we annex hereto a copy of their audit report dated ……………………………. along with a copy of each of :-
(a) balance sheet as on ……………………………………
(b) the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account for the period beginning from ………..…to ending on ……………………………,
(c) the cash flow statement for the period beginning from ……..…to ending on ……&h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

subject to the following observations/qualifications, if any:
(a) …………………………….…………………………….………………………
(b) …………………………….…………………………….………………………
(c) …………………………….…………………………….………………………
………………………………………………………………………………….

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Amar Cables Versus Commissioner of GST and Central Excise Madurai

M/s. Amar Cables Versus Commissioner of GST and Central Excise Madurai
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 1084 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 17-9-2018
Appeal No. ST/271/2010 – Final Order No. 42442/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri Vadivalagai Nambi, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, ADC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
Based on instructions received from the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Division to verify the details of cable operators who are getting television signals transmitted by Sumangali Cable Vision (SCV), the premises were visited by the officers. After investigation

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er section 78 of the Act. Hence the appellant is before this Tribunal.
2. The ld. counsel Shri Vadivalagai Nambi appeared and argued the matter. He submitted that the demand has been raised without any basis. The appellant was providing cable operator service and the adjudicating authority after analyzing the evidence available had dropped the demand of Rs. 3,44,248/- and had confirmed an amount of Rs. 25,572/- only. The Commissioner in the revision order has relied upon documents seized from SCV to arrive at the total taxable value which is highly erroneous. He submitted that the records received from SCV showed that 550 connections were taken by the appellant and based upon such figures have arrived at the total tax of Rs. 3,44,248/-. Me

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

demand of service tax and the penalties imposed is correct and proper. He added that the appellant has suppressed facts with intent to evade payment of tax and therefore the imposition of penalties is legal and proper.
4. Heard both sides.
5. From the submissions made before us as well as the records, we are able to see that the demand of service tax has been confirmed by the Commissioner in the revision order merely basing upon the documents recovered from SCV. In the registers recovered, it was seen that the appellant had taken 550 connections and paid the amount calculated at Rs. 20/- per connection for a month as charges to KTV. Thus department has assumed that the appellants have provided 550 connections of KTV, a pay channel to var

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-I under rule 117(1A) of the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases.

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-I under rule 117(1A) of the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases.
CCW/GST/74/2015 Dated:- 17-9-2018 Andhra Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Commercial Taxes Department
Proceedings of the Chief Commissioner of State Tax, Andhra Pradesh
Present: Sri. J. Syamala Rao, I.A.S.
CCTs Ref.in CCW/GST/74/2015 Dt.17.09.2018
Order under SGST:
Subject: Extension of time li

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

REGARDING PENDING GSTIN CANCELLATIONS.

REGARDING PENDING GSTIN CANCELLATIONS.
Circular No. 1819043/593 Dated:- 17-9-2018 Uttar Pradesh SGST
GST – States
=============
Document 1पत्राà¤â€šà¤â€¢ /
1319043
17-9-18
593 / 18-19/ (à¤Å“à¥â‚¬.एस.टà¥â‚¬. à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â­Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤â€” ) / वाणिà¤Å“्य à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°
à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â²Ã Â¤Â¯:- à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â° (à¤Å“à¥â‚¬.एस.टà¥â‚¬.),
वाणिà¤Å“्य à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°, मुà¤â€“्यालय, लà¤â€“नऊ।
लà¤â€“नऊà¤Æâ€™: दिनाà¤â€šà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Æâ€™ 17,
सितम्बर, 2018
समस्त à¤Å“à¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â² एडà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â² à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â°, à¤â€”्रà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¡-1,
वाणिà¤Å“्य à

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â·Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š, à¤Å“िसà¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ माध्यम सà¥â€¡ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤â€”त à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤â€”या हà¥Ë† à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿
à¤Å“à¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤Å¸Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥Â¦ निरस्तà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â£ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ बड़à¥â‚¬ सà¤â€šà¤â€“्या मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š लम्बित प्रार्थना पत्रà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š पर प्रधानमà¤â€šà¤¤à¥à¤°à¥â‚¬ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â²Ã Â¤Â¯
द्वारा à¤â€¦Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¸Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â¾ व्यà¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬ à¤â€”à¤Ë† हà¥Ë†, à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¸ सम्बन्à¤Â

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¥ÂÃ Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¾ प्रà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â·Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¤ पत्र à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ समस्त सà¤â€šà¤²à¤â€”्नà¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡
साथ सà¤â€šà¤²à¤â€”्न à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°, à¤â€ Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¸ निर्दà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¶ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ साथ प्रà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â·Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¤ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾ à¤Å“ा रहा हà¥Ë† à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿ एà¤â€¢ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â­Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¨
चलाà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â° à¤Å“à¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤Å¸Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥Â¦ निरस्तà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â£ सà¥â€¡ सम्बन्धित लम्बित प्रार्थना पत्रà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾ 15 दिन à¤â€¢Ã 

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¤¿à¤§à¤¿),
वाणिà¤Å“्य à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°, मुà¤â€“्यालय, लà¤â€“नऊ ।
https://mail.gov.in/iwc_static/layout/shell.html?lang=en&3.0.1.2.0_15121607
ject: Re: Fwd: [Gstc-Nodal Officers] Representation from Prime Minister's Office
(PMO).-reg
To: “Commissioner, Commercial Tax, UP” ,
vkumarjcct@gmail.com, upctres@gmail.com, srajantripathi@gmail.com,
ctstathqlu-up@nic.in, upct_stat@rediffmail.com
Date: 31/08/18 05:58 PM
ctithqlu-up.vcf (75bytes)
From: “Joint Commissioner (I.T.) Commercial Tax,, Head Quarter UP”
Respected Sir,
Please see trailing email regarding “Pendency in GSTIN cancellation”. We are facing following reasons regarding pendency of
cancellation applications in UP
1. There are huge number of applications related to cancellation which are not available in any jurisdictional office or available in
deactivated jurisdiction offices which is primary reason of pendency in UP.
2. Also there is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Prime Minister's Office (PMO) regarding pendency
in GSTIN cancellation.
It is requested that necessary comments/reasons and action taken thereon may please be intimated to GST Council Secretariat by email at
gstc.secretariat@gov.in latest by 31.08.2018.
Sincerely
Rahul Raja
Under Secretary, GST Council
à¤Å“्वा० à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¥Â¦ ( à¤Å“à¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤Å¸Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦)
1604
05-09-18
Cakex
sto (cio)
05-9.18
https://mail.gov.in/iwc_static/layout/shell.html?lang=en&3.0.1.2.0_15121607
ESI
5-9-18
12
1/2
OM-28.08.2018 – States – GSTIN Cancellation.pdf (969kB)
Subject: [Gstc-Nodal Officers] Representation from Prime Minister's Office (PMO).-reg
To: gstc-nodalofficers@lsmgr.nic.in
Date: 08/28/18 05:31 PM
From: gstc.secretariat@gov.in
Sender: gstc-nodalofficers-bounces@lsmgr.nic.in
https://mail.gov.in/iwc_static/layout/shell.html?lang=en&3.0.1.2.0_1…
Dear Madam/Sir,
Kindly find attached Office Memorandum dated 28.08.2018 regarding representati

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n of GSTINs and had observed that this is forcing people to file nil returns and it is also
leading to corruption.
2. It is requested to expeditiously take necessary action to reduce the pendency in respective
States/UTs. State/UT wise pendency of GSTIN registration cancellation requests with the State/UT tax
authorities as on 27.08.2018 is enclosed for reference (Annexure 1).
3. In view of the above, it is requested furnish comments/reasons regarding the pendency of
GSTIN cancellations and action taken thereon to reduce the pendency by 31.08.2018.
4.
This issues with the approval of the Joint Secretary, GST Council.
селен
28.08.18
Rahul Raja
Under Secretary, GST Council
Enclosure: As above
To:
Commissioner, Commercial Taxes of all States and UTs
Copy to: for information
Commissioner, GST Policy Wing, CBIC
Date of Report – 27.08.2018
Pendency of GSTINS cancellation
Annexuge-1
Status of applications for Cancellation of RC
Disposed by
Pending with
Pending with
Filed with S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

S.A. Realty Versus Commissioner of GST, Mumbai Central

S.A. Realty Versus Commissioner of GST, Mumbai Central
Service Tax
2018 (10) TMI 1072 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 17-9-2018
APPEAL No. ST/87412/2018 – A/87308/2018
Service Tax
Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (Judicial)
Shri Jinit R. Shah, C.A., for appellant
Shri M.P. Damle, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for respondent
ORDER
This is an appeal filed against order-in-appeal No. MUM/DGPM/WRU/APP-54/17-18 dated 27.3.2018 passed by Principal Additional Director General, DGPM, Customs & Central Tax, WRU, Mumbai.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in providing the service of construction of residential complex service during the relevant period. The show cause cum demand notice was issued to the appellant on 21.10.2015 alleging non-payment of service tax during the period 1.7.2010 to 30.6.2012 amounting to Rs. 8,27,234/- and short payment of service tax of Rs. 1,33,477/- for the relevant period. On adjudication,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nditions laid down under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. On the demand of Rs. 1,33,477/-, he submits that the said amount has been confirmed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) taking into consideration the value of loans and other entries in general vouchers as the taxable value received in providing the taxable services during the relevant period. He has submitted that the value of loan and the value of other non-taxable services were wrongly computed in arriving at the gross taxable value. Therefore, the service tax of Rs. 1,33,477/- is unsustainable in law. He has submitted that though necessary evidences of acknowledgment of the loan, general vouchers etc. were placed before the authorities below, but the same were not considered.
4. Per contra, learned AR for the Revenue reiterated the findings of the learned Commissioner (Appeals).
5. I find that undisputedly, the appellant had though rendered taxable services under the category of construction of residential complex se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ection in their books of account etc., I find that both the authorities below have not addressed on the defence advanced by the appellant. Therefore, to ascertain the correctness of the claim of the appellant, the matter needs to be remanded to the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority would consider the plea of the appellant and the evidences that would be produced by them during the course of adjudicating proceedings and decide the issue accordingly.
6. In the result, the impugned order is modified to the extent of allowing the benefit of discharging 25% of the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, subject to fulfilment of the conditions and the correctness of the liability of service tax of Rs. 1,33,477/- be ascertained afresh based on the evidences and record by the adjudicating authority.
7. Appeal is allowed by way of remand the adjudicating authority in the light of the observation made as above.
(Pronounced in court)
Case laws, Decisions

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

NMDC Limited Versus CCT, Rangareddy GST

NMDC Limited Versus CCT, Rangareddy GST
Central Excise
2018 (10) TMI 529 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 17-9-2018
Appeal No. E/30543/2018 – A/31172/2018
Central Excise
Mr. P. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri Y. Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri P.S. Reddy, Asst. Commissioner /AR for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao
1. This appeal has been filed against Order-in-Appeal No. HYD-EXCUSRRC- APP-023-17-18 APP I, Dated 04.01.2018.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records.
3. The appellant herein is a Public Sector Undertaking engaged in the manufacture of sponge iron from iron ore. During the process of manufacture, iron ore fines gets generated which is a waste product but it has marketable value. During audit, the assessee was asked to reverse CENVAT credit under rule 6(3) of CCR 2004 to the extent they have gone into the value of iron ore fines on the ground that they were exempted. Appe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

missed and the Order-in-Original was upheld. Hence this appeal.
4. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that they had contested the demand both on merits as well as on limitation before the first appellate authority. They further contested that no penalty can be imposed on them alleging suppression of facts with an intent to evade payment of duty for the reason that they are the Public Sector Undertaking and have no intention of avoiding payment of duty or irregularly availing CENVAT credit. Before the first appellate authority, he also relied on the cases of CCE Raipur vs. Arti Sponge & Power Ltd. 2017(350)ELT 268 (Tri.-Del.)] to argue that iron ore fines which are produced during the process of manufacture of sponge iron ore are not a manufactured product at all and therefore Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 does not apply in this case. This was recorded in the order of the first appellate authority. Appellant further relied upon the case of Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

this issue.
6. I have considered the arguments of both sides. There is no dispute on the facts of the case that the demand is on reversal of CENVAT credit under rule 6(3) for the value of iron ore fines generated by the appellant during the process of manufacture of final products viz; Sponge iron. On the very same issue in the case of Maa Mangla Ispat Pvt. Ltd. [2017(49)STR 503 (Tri.-Del.)] and Aarti Sponge & Power Limited [2017(350)ELT 268 (Tri.-Del.)], the Principal Bench of CESTAT has decided that Rule 6(3) of CCR 2004 does not apply because iron ore fines are not manufactured let alone being exempted. I find that the first appellate authority has not considered this aspect at all.
7. In view of the above, I find that it is a fit case to be remanded back to the first appellate authority to examine the issue on merits and also on limitation in the light of the aforesaid decisions of the Tribunal.
8. Appeal is allowed by way of remand.
(Dictated and Pronounced in open Court)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =