M/s Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., Bharti Airtel Limited, M/s Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ras Polytex Pvt. Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. L

M/s Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., Bharti Airtel Limited, M/s Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ras Polytex Pvt. Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail Ltd., M/s. Navyug Airconditioning And M/s. Proactive Plast Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of U.P. And 02 Others And State Of U.P. And 3 Others
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1261 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 193 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 18-9-2018
Writ Tax No. – 587 of 2018, 454 of 2018, 455 of 2018, 462 of 2018, 458 of 2018, 559 of 2018, 560 of 2018, 478 of 2018, 464 of 2018, 551 of 2018, 87 of 2018
GST
Sudhir Agarwal And Ifaqat Ali Khan, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Praveen Kumar, Atul Gupta,Utkarsh Malviya, Nishant Mishra, Bipin Kumar Pandey,Aditya Pandey, Ritvik Upadhya,Vinod Kumar Upadhya, Nishant Mishra,Vipin Kumar Kushwaha, Praveen Kumar, Nishant Mishra,Tanmay Sadh
F

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 21st March 2018 passed by Assistant Commissioner, State Commercial Tax, Mobile Squad, Unit-I, Shamli in purported exercise of powers under Section 129 (1) of UPGST Act, 2017 on the allegation that in respect of goods transported by Vehicle No. DL-1LW-5527, aforesaid authority has reason to believe that for evasion of State Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred to as “SGST”) goods have been transported by said vehicle. Estimated value of goods constituting machines and parts, mentioned in the order is Rs. 9,85,000/-. Petitioner M/s. Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited has transported six loading/unloading machines from its manufacturing unit situated at Thane, (State of Maharashtra) through two tax invoices dated 16.03.2018, to its Ghaziabad office, for the purpose of being used at Warehouse of M/s. Alstom Manufacturing India Pvt. Limited, Saharanpur as inter unit stock. Aforesaid goods were transporte

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssistant Commissioner, requiring petitioner to show cause up to 28.03.2018 as to why tax and penalty of Rs. 1,87,300/- may not be imposed upon the petitioner. The aforesaid order of seizure has been challenged on the ground that mistake was unintentional, Assistant Commissioner has no jurisdiction to pass order of seizure as there is no requirement of carrying any other E-Way Bill under U.P.G.S.T Act, 2017 and Rules framed thereunder.
(II) Writ Tax No. 454 of 2018
3. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. LG Electronics India Limited assailing interception memo dated 15.03.2018, seizure order dated 16.03.2018 and show cause notice dated 16.03.2018 issued by Assistant Commissioner, State Commercial Tax Division Mobile Squad III, Sonbhadra. This writ petition has also challenged Notification dated 21.07.2017 issued by State of U.P. making carrying on E-Way Bill-01 for import of goods worth Rs. 50,000/- from out side the State in State of U.P. mandatory, and also letters dated 06.02.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HR3SV0769 against G.R. No. 3001-3002 dated 14.03.2018 issued by Transporter to petitioner. Tax invoices issued in respect to aforesaid goods were numbered as STNAKW2018647, STNAKW2018648 and STNAKW2018649 dated 13.03.2018. All the requisite details of transportation of said goods were mentioned in receipts issued by Transporter. Requisite documents were with driver of vehicle. The vehicle was intercepted by Mobile Squad Team of Uttar Pradesh Commercial Tax Division, (hereinafter referred to as “UPCTD”) and detained at Raparganj, District Sonbhadra by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad III. Interception memo dated 15.03.2018 at 10:30 A.M was issued and handed over to driver of vehicle. Memo of interception was issued on the ground that driver of vehicle was not carrying E-Way Bill 01, though in possession of original tax invoices issued by Consignor and LR receipts issued by Transporter. Thereafter physical verification was made by Assistant Commissioner who submitted report dated 16.0

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

It is duly registered under U.P.G.S.T Act 2017 having GSTIN No. 09AAACB2894GIZP.
Petitioner transferred stock by two consignments of eight boxes each, of telecom goods from its New Delhi office to Varanasi. It generated two separate E-Way Bill-01 giving details of both the transactions including details of goods and vehicle number. These two E-Way Bills numbered as 1803W177918800367522 and 1803W177918800369265 dated 12.03.2018. The goods were transported through GIR Movers Pvt. Limited by vehicle no. UP32F/N6684. Petitioner also issued invoices-Cum-Challan no. DLG25723 and DLG25727 dated 12.03.2018 for two transactions after charging Integrated Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred to as “I.G.S.T Act”) at the rate of 18%.
When goods were in transit from Delhi to Varanasi, the vehicle in which they were being transported i.e. UP32F/N6684, broke down.
Hence goods were transferred to another vehicle no. DL1GC/3360 at Hathras. Aforesaid vehicle DL1GC/3360 while crossing Commercia

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

thereunder.
The mechanism of E-Way Bill under Central Goods and Service Tax Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Rules 2017”) have not been implemented by Central Government. Hence, E-Way Bill alongwith goods were not carried by Transporter and that cannot be a ground for seizure or imposition of penalty. Hence, there is no violation of any provisions of IGST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017 or the Rules framed thereunder. Therefore, provisions of section 129 (1) of UPGST Act cannot be invoked against petitioner. UPGST Act 2017 cannot transgress upon field occupied by IGST Act 2017 and Notification issued under Rule 129 is beyond the power conferred by UPGST Act 2017.
(IV) Writ Tax No. 46 2 of 2018
5. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India by M/s. Guala Closures (India) Pvt., Ltd., having its Registered Office D-1, Sesa Ghor, Patto, P.O. Box No. 101, Panjim, Goa, challenging order of seizure dated 05.03.2018 and show cause notice of same date. Pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ound that State E-Way Bill- 01, was not being carried by transporter. Thereafter a seizure order was issued on 05.03.2018 alleging that without E-Way Bill- 01 goods were being transported in State of U.P. from outside U.P. A show cause notice under section 129 (3) of U.P.G.S.T. 2017 was also issued on 05.03.2018. It is also challenged on the ground that respondents have no authority to intercept goods, detain, and pass order of seizure as there was no requirement of carrying E-Way Bill- 01 and provisions of provincial Statute cannot override provisions of Central Statute.
(V) Writ Tax No. 458 of 2018
6. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. RAS Polytex Pvt. Ltd having its manufacturing unit E-II, Ramnagar, Industrial Area, Chandauli (State of U.P.). It has assailed seizure order dated 09.03.2018 passed by Deputy Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner, Unit Chandauli and notice dated 09.03.2018 passed under section 129 (3) of U.P.G.S.T. Act 2017. It has also sought a writ of certiora

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Way Bill-01.
Seizure order was passed under section 129 (1) on 09.03.2018 and it is also mentioned that U.P. E-Way Bill was not accompanied and Central E-Way Bill dated 07.03.2018 was generated on trial basis, therefore, it was not legally acceptable. Respondent 4 also issued notice under section 129 (3) proposing imposition of tax of Rs. 1,07,460/- and penalty of same amount i.e. Rs. 1,07,460/-.
(VI) Writ Tax No. 559 of 2018 & Writ Tax No. 560 of 2018
7. Both these writ petitions have been filed by same petitioner M/s. Rimjhim Ispat Limited, having its manufacturing unit at Industrial Area, Sumerput, District Hamirpur (U.P.) and registered office at 123/360, Fazalganj, Kanpur. In Writ Petition No. 559 of 2018 seizure order dated 11.03.2018 and show cause notice issued under section 129 (3) dated 17.03.2018 have been challenged, which have been passed by Assistant Commissioner GST/State Tax, Mobile Squad, 7th Unit Kanpur. Here petitioner sold Stainless Steel Bright Bars to M/s. M.R.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ies Limited Unit-II, B-3, Site II, Loni Road Industrial, Mohan Nagar District Ghaziabad were being transported through Transporter M/s. Buland Road Transport Company by Truck no. UP78BT2199. Petitioner has generated tax invoice no. 08440 dated 28.02.2018 for goods worth Rs. 21,31,051/- which includes IGST. E-Way Bill-02 dated 28.02.2018 was also generated by petitioner giving all details. Same were intercepted and detained by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad, Kannauj on the ground that E-Way Bills had already expired. Consequently seizure order was passed on 07.03.2018 and a show cause notice under section 129 (3) were issued on the same date, proposing tax of Rs. 3,27,420/- and penalty of same amount.
(VII) Writ Tax No. 478 of 2018
9. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. Ltd., having its Unit at Industrial Area, Ghaziabad challenging, seizure order dated 19.03.2018 and show cause notice of the same date issued by Assistant Commissioner, State/Commercial

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

posing to impose tax of Rs. 1,23,764/- and equivalent amount of penalty.
(VIII) Writ Tax No. 464 of 2018
10. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., Rave Multiplex Complex, V.I.P. Road, Kanpur.
Petitioner placed an order for supply of certain goods (advertising material) to M/s. J.K. Advertising, J-10, Jahangeerpuri, New Delhi in respect of said goods. 7 invoices were prepared on 11/12.03.2018 and goods were transported through Transporter M/s. Maa Chamunda Devi Transport Service, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi, through truck no. HR55AA-0252. Transporter issued four separate GRs on 12.03.2018 and also downloaded a consolidated E-Way Bill for the aforesaid transaction from the website of Central Government on 12.03.2018.
While in transit, goods were intercepted by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad Unit, Etah, in the morning on 13.03.2018 and same were detained on the ground that E-Way Bill-01 of U.P. Government was not available alongwith goods. Aft

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for delivery at Ghaziabad. The goods were intercepted by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad, Unit-V, Noida on 24.03.2018 and detained on the ground that goods did not accompany E-Way Bill-01 prescribed under UPGST Rules 2017. A seizure order was passed on 25.03.2018 and notice under section 129 (3) was also issued on the same date proposing levy of tax of Rs. 1,54,699/- and penalty of the same amount.
(X) Writ Tax No. 87 of 2018
12. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Proactive Plast Pvt. Ltd., Plots No. 274, 275, 280, 281, Ecotech-1 Extension, Kasna, Greater Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar. He has filed this writ petition challenging seizure order dated 20.01.2018 and notice issued on same date under section 129 (1) and (3) of UPGST Act 2017.
Petitioner company is engaged in manufacture of packing material and registered under UPGST Act 2017, having GST TIN No. 09AADCP5536C1ZJ. Petitioner placed purchase order of raw material i.e. 2,500 Kg of NUCREAL AE Resin and 7,500 Kg

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under section 129 (1) and notice under section 129 (3) was also issued on the same date proposing tax of Rs. 31,17,500/- and penalty of same amount.
13. In order to give a consolidated bird eye view of details of invoices, seizure orders, show-cause notices and the amount of tax/penalty proposed, a chart is being given as under:
S. N.
Writ Petition No.
Name of petitioner
Date of invoice
Date of interception/seizure order
Date of show cause notice
Amount of tax/penalty proposed
Date of Final order
1.
587/2018
M/s Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing co. Ltd. Hapur.
16.3.18
21.3.18
21.3.18
374600/-

2.
454/2018
LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd.
13.3.18
15.3.18/16.3.18
16.3.18
2326944/-

3.
455/2018
Bharti Airtel Limited
12.3.18
14.3.18
14.3.18
2552310/-

4.
462/2018
Mrs. Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd.
23.2.18
5.3.18
5.3.
18 269378/-

5.
458/2018
M/s RAS Polytex Pvt. Ltd.
7.3.18
9.3.18
9.3.18
209520/-

6.
559/2018
Rimjhim Ispat Ltd.
8.3.18
11

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion.
(ii) Provisions of U.P.G.S.T Act 2017 will have to sub-serve to the provision of I.G.S.T Act 2017 when goods are transported in an Inter-State transaction, which is governed by I.G.S.T Act 2017.
(iii) Fault in any case is unintentional and therefore, there could have been no seizure or imposition of penalty in the exercise of powers under Section 129.
(iv) Tax having already been paid and shown in tax invoices, there is no occasion to levy tax again on aforesaid goods and it is wholly without jurisdiction and illegal.
(v) Demand of penalty is illegal since applicable tax had already been paid prior to transportation of goods in the matters where the allegation is that e-way-bill has expired.
(vi) The fact is that vehicle transporting the goods broke down hence, goods were transferred to another vehicle or after repair transportation resumed therefore delay was neither intentional nor deliberate and hence penalty is not attracted.
(vii) Notification no. 1014 dated 21.07.2017

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ll-02 shall remain valid and this prescription by Commissioner is ultra-vires and beyond the power conferred upon him as it is not contemplated either under the Act or the Rules or even Notification dated 21 July, 2017 issued by State Government.
Prescription of time period of validity of e-way-bill-02 could have been done only by the State Government and not the Commissioner and this power exercised by Commissioner vide circular dated 09th August, 2017 is wholly ultra-vires.
(ix) Rule 138 confers no power upon State Government to subdelegate power to Commissioner.
(x) Commissioner in its circular dated 09th August 2017 has prescribed time period of validity for e-way-bill-01 for Inter- State movement and also for e-way-bill-02 for Intra-State movement. However, for the same distance, time period for eway- bill-02 is only 48 hours while for e-way-bill-01 it is ten days. This distinction/different period of time is clearly discriminatory and arbitrary having no rationale and nexus wi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ions on Intra-State transactions and seizure orders and notices issued are wholly without jurisdiction.
15. Per-Contra learned Standing Counsel argued that a valid Notification was issued under Section 129 and petitioners having flouted the provisions thereof, in order to give opportunity, show cause notices have been issued after passing seizure orders and the same warrant no interference.
16. We have heard Sri V.K. Upadhyay, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Praveen Kumar, Sri Nishant Mishra, Sri Ritvik Upadhyay, Sri Tanmay Sadh and Sri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for Petitioners and Sri Manish Goyal, Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents. We have also perused record of all writ petitions and relevant statutes in depth.
17. Concept of Goods and Services Tax (hereinafter referred to as “G.S.T.”) has been brought by Parliament through One Hundred and First Constitution Amendment vide “Constitution (One Hundred and First

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods and services tax,-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in Articles 246 and 254, Parliament, and, subject to clause (2), the Legislature of every State, have power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax imposed by the Union or by such State.
(2) Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax where the supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of Inter-state trade or commerce.
Explanation.- The provisions of this article, shall, in respect of goods and services tax referred to in clause (5) of Article- 279-A take effect from the date recommended by the Goods and Services Tax Council.”
“269-A. Levy and collection of goods and services tax in course of inter-State trade or commerce.-(1) Goods and services tax on supplies in the course of Inter-State trade or commerce shall be levied and collected by the Government of India and such tax shall be apportioned between the Union and the States in the manner as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

services, or both takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.”
18. There are corresponding amendments in Articles 248, 249, 250, 268, 269, 270, 271, 286, 366, 368 and in Sixth and Seventh Schedules of the Constitution. Article 268-A has been omitted by the aforesaid Amendment. Provision of Constitution of Goods and Services Tax Council has been made by insertion of article 279-A.
19. Definitions of “Goods and Service Tax” and “Services” had been provided by insertion of clauses 12-A and 26-A in Article 366 and the aforesaid two clauses read as under:
“(12-A) “goods and services tax” means any tax on supply of goods, or services or both except taxes on the supply of the alcoholic liquor for human consumption;',
(26-A) “Services” means anything other than goods;”
20. Section 1 (2) of One Hundred and First Amendment Act 2016 provides that the aforesaid amendment of Constitution shall come into force on such date as Central Government may, by Notification in the Of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

person; to provide for conduct of audit of registered persons in order to verify compliance with the provisions of Act; to provide for recovery of arrears of tax using various modes including detaining and sale of goods, movable and immovable property of defaulting taxable person; to provide for powers of inspection search, seizure and arrest to the officers; to establish G.S.T Appellate Tribunal by Central Government; to make provision for penalties for contravention of the credit; to provide for an anti-profiteering clause in order to ensure that business passes on the benefit of reduced tax incidence on goods and services or both to the consumers and to provide for elaborate for transitional provisions.
23. IGST Act 2017 to some extent has replaced Central Sales Tax Act 1956. Article 269 of Constitution empowered Parliament to make laws on the taxes to be levied on the sale or purchase taking place in the course of Inter-State Trade or Commerce. Consequently Central Sales Tax 1956

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ervices on reverse charge basis; empower Central Government to grant exemptions; determination of nature of supply as to whether it is an Inter-State or an Intra-State supply; to provide elaborate provisions for determining place of supply in relation to goods or services or both; payment of tax by a supplier of online information and data-base access or retrieval services; refund of tax paid on supply of goods to tourist leaving India; apportionment of tax and settlement of funds and for transfer of input tax credit between Central Government, State Government and Union Territory; application of certain provisions of C.G.S.T Act 2017; and transitional transactions in relation to import of services made on or after appointed day.
24. Sections 1, 2, 3, 14, 20 and 22 of IGST Act 2017 were enforced w.e.f 22.06.2017. Sections 4 to 13, 16 to 19, 21, and 23 to 25 were enforced w.e.f 01.07.2017. For the purpose of execution of provisions of CGST Act 2017, Sections 3 to 5 make provisions for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ral Tax or Assistant Directors of Central Tax, and
(i) any other class of officers as it may deem fit: PROVIDED that the officers appointed under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) shall be deemed to be the officers appointed under the provisions of this Act.
4. Appointment of officers.- (1) The Board may, in addition to the officers as may be notified by the Government under Section 3, appoint such persons as it may think fit to be the officers under this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), the Board may, by order, authorise any officer referred to in clauses (a) to (h) of Section 3 to appoint officers of central tax below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of central tax for the administration of this Act.
5. Powers of officers.- (1) Subject to such conditions and limitations as the Board may impose, an officer of central tax may exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on him under this Act.
(2) An officer of central

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ubject to the conditions specified in the Notification issued under sub-section (1),
(a) where any proper officer issues an order under this Act, he shall also issue an order under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, as authorised by the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, as the case may be, under intimation to the jurisdictional officer of State tax or Union territory tax;
(b) where a proper officer under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, no proceedings shall be initiated by the proper officer under this Act on the same subject matter.
(3) Any proceedings for rectification, appeal and revision, wherever applicable, of any order passed by an officer appointed under this Act shall not lie before an officer appointed under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

therein, in relation to Integrated Tax in the same manner as CGST Act 2017 applies in relation to Section 20 of IGST Act 2017 which reads as under:-
“20. Application of provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act.- Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act relating to,-
(i) scope of supply;
(ii) composite supply and mixed supply;
(iii) time and value of supply;
(iv) input tax credit;
(v) registration;
(vi) tax invoice, credit and debit notes;
(vii) accounts and records;
(viii) returns, other than late fee;
(ix) payment of tax;
(x) tax deduction at source;
(xi) collection of tax at source;
(xii) assessment;
(xiii) refunds;
(xiv) audit;
(xv) inspection, search, seizure and arrest;
(xvi) demands and recovery;
(xvii) liability to pay in certain cases;
(xviii) advance ruling;
(xix) appeals and revision;
(xx) presumption as to documents;
(xxi) offences and penaltie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion to States) Act, if charged separately by the supplier:
PROVIDED ALSO that in cases where the penalty is leviable under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, the penalty leviable under this Act shall be the sum total of the said penalties.”
28. As we have already said section 3 of IGST Act 2017 was made effective from by 22.06.2017 and section 4 was made effective from 01.07.2017. Section 164 of CGST Act 2017 confers Rule framing power upon Central Government and pursuant thereto CGST Rules 2017 were made and enforced w.e.f 22nd June 2017. Similarly section 22 of IGST Act 2017 confers power upon Central Government to makes Rules and pursuant thereto Integrated Goods and Service Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “IGST Rules 2017”) were framed and came into force w.e.f 22.06.2017. It is a small set of Rules containing only two Rules. Rule 1 relates to short title and commencement Rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct 2017
UPGST Act 2017
129. Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit.-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, all such goods and conveyance used as a means of transport for carrying the said goods and documents relating to such goods and conveyance shall be liable to detention or seizure and after detention or seizure, shall be released,-
(a) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to one hundred per cent. of the tax payable on such goods and, in case of exempted goods, on payment of an amount equal to two per cent of the value of goods or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the goods comes forward for payment of such tax and penalty;
(b) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to the fifty per cent of the value of the goods reduc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under subsection (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard.
(5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub-section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded.
(6)Where the person transporting any goods or the owner of the goods fails to pay the amount of tax and penalty as provided in sub-section (1) within seven days of such detention or seizure, further proceedings shall be initiated in accordance with the provisions of Section 130:
PROVIDED that where the detained or seized goods are perishable or hazardous in nature or are likely to depreciate in value with passage of time, the said period of seven days may be reduced by the proper officer.
129. Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit.-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of thi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on furnishing a security equivalent to the amount payable under clause (a) or clause (b) in such form and manner as may be prescribed:
Provided that no such goods or conveyance shall be detained or seized without serving an order of detention or seizure on the person transporting the goods.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 67 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply for detention and seizure of goods and conveyances.
(3) The proper officer detaining or seizing goods or conveyances shall issue a notice specifying the tax and penalty payable and thereafter, pass an order for payment of tax and penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c).
(4) No tax, interest or penalty shall be determined under subsection (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard.
(5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub- section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded.
(6) Where the person transporting any

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ay be specified to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed.
(2) The details of documents required to be carried under subsection (1) shall be validated in such manner as may be prescribed.
(3) Where any conveyance referred to in sub-section (1) is intercepted by the proper officer at any place, he may require the person in charge of the said conveyance to produce the documents prescribed under the said sub-section and devices for verification, and the said person shall be liable to produce the documents and devices and also allow the inspection of goods.
68. Inspection of goods in movement.-
(1) The Government may require the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding such amount as may be specified to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed.
(2) The details of documents required to be carried under subsection (1) shall be validated in such manner as may be prescribed.
(3) Where an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uch time as an E-way-Bill system is developed and approved by the Council, the Government may, by Notification, specify the documents that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods shall carry while the goods are in movement or in transit storage.
33. U.P. Government in purported exercise of powers under Rule 138 of UPGST Rules 2017, issued a Notification no. KA.NI-1014/XI- 9(52)/17-UPGST-Rules-2017-Order-(31)-2017-Lucknow dated 21st July 2017 specifying documents required be carried by a person in charge of conveyance carrying any consignment of goods while in movement or in transit, storage in U.P. and it reads as under:-
“Uttar Pradesh Shashan
Sansthagat Vitta, Kar Evam Nibandhan Anubhag -2
Notification
No.-K.A.NI.-1014/XI-9(52)/17-U.P.GST Rules-2017-
Order-(31)-2017
Lucknow : 21 July 2017
In exercise of the powers under Rule 138 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 framed under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 201

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the goods during the transportation or transit storage of the goods:
a) Mentha Oil, Menthol and D.M.O.,
b) Supari,
c) Iron and Steel,
d) All types of edible oils and Vanaspathi ghee.
(3) In case of transportation of taxable goods by ecommerce operators or their authorized transporters, courier agents or agents for delivery to a person within Uttar Pradesh, the enclosed form e-way bill-03 shall be carried with such goods during the transportation of goods or transit storage within State.
(4) In case of transportation of taxable goods valuing Rs. 5,000 or more from a place outside Uttar Pradesh to a place outside the State, the form TDF-01 shall be carried with such goods during the transportation of goods or their transit storage within the State and on the exit of goods from the State, the information shall be provided in Form TDF-02.
(5) The forms mentioned in clauses (1), (2), (3) and (4) above shall be downloaded by the procedure prescribed by the Commissioner State Tax/

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7 was issued amending procedure for downloading relevant forms and it was also declared that Government Notification dated 21.07.2017 shall be effective from 16.08.2017.
35. Further in exercise of powers under Section 164 of UPGST Act 2017, U.P. Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'UPGST (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017') were published vide Notification no. KA.NI-2-1359/XI-9(42)/17- UPGST-Rules-2017-Order-(45)-2017-Lucknow dated 20th September 2017 and Rule 138 was substituted by following Sub Rule 1 to 14:-
“138. Information to be furnished prior to commencement of movement of goods and generation of e-way bill.-
(1) Every registered person who causes movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees-
(i) in relation to a supply; or
(ii) for reason other than supply; or
(iii) due to inward supply from an unregistered person.
shall, before commencement of such movement, furnish information relating to the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rate and carry the e-way bill even if the value of the consignment is less than fifty thousand rupees:
Provided further that where the movement is caused by an unregistered person either in his own conveyance or a hired one or through a transporter, he or the transporter may, at their option, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the common portal in the manner specified in this rule
Provided also that where the goods are transported for a distance of less than ten kilometers within the State or Union territory from the place of business of the consignor to the place of business of the transporter for further transportation, the supplier or the transporter may not furnish the details of conveyance in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
Explanation I. For the purposes of this sub-rule, where the goods are supplied by an unregistered supplier to a recipient who is registered, the movement shall be said to be caused by such recipient if the recipient is known at the time of commencement

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (1), where multiple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance, the transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 may be generated by him on the said common portal prior to the movement of goods.
(7) Where the consignor or the consignee has not generated FORM GST EWB-01 in accordance with the provisions of subrule
(1) and the value of goods carried in the conveyance is more than fifty thousand rupees, the transporter shall generate FORM GSTEWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case may be, and may also generate a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 on the common portal prior to the movement of goods.
(8) The information furnished in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 shall be made available to the registered supplier on the common portal who ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

able
Sr. no.
Distance
Validity period
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Upto 100 km
One day
2.
For every 100 km or part thereof thereafter
One additional day
 
Provided that the Commissioner may, by Notification, extend the validity period of e-way bill for certain categories of goods as may be specified therein: Provided further that where, under circumstances of an exceptional nature, the goods cannot be transported within the validity period of e-way bill, the transporter may generate another e-way bill after updating the details in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01
Explanation.-For the purposes of this rule, the “relevant date” shall mean the date on which the e-way bill has been generated and the period of validity shall be counted from the time at which the e-way bill has been generated and each day shall be counted as twenty-four hours.
(11) The details of e-way bill generated under sub-rule (1) shall be made available to the recipient, if registered, on the common portal, who

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d within such areas in the State and for values exceeding such amount as the Commissioner of State Tax in consultation with the Chief Commissioner of Central Tax may notify.
Explanation- The facility of generation and cancellation of eway bill may also be made available through SMS.”
36. Rules 1 (2) of UPGST (4th Amendment) Rules 2017 provides that amendment in the Rules notified on 20th September 2017 shall come into force on such date as State Government may by Notification in official gazette appoint, By the aforesaid Amendment it also inserted Rules 138-A, Rule 138-B, Rule 138-C and Rule 138-D.
37. In furtherance of Rule 1 (2) of UPGST (4th Amendment) Rules 2017 read with section 164 of UPGST Act 2017 and 21 of U.P. General Clauses Act, Governor by Notification No. KA.NI-2-138/XI-9(42)/17- U.P. Act-1-2017-Order-(101)-2018 dated 30.01.2018 appointed 1st February 2018 enforcing the amendment made in the provisions at serial no. 10 and 11 of notification no. KA.NI-2-1359/XI-9(42)/1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-U.P. GST Rules-2017-Order-(45)-2017 dated 20-10-2017, shall come into force.”
38. Perhaps this mistake was noticed by Government subsequently and, therefore, it issued another Notification no. KA.NI-177/XI-9- (42)/17-UP Act-1-2017-Order-(109)-2018-Lucknow- dated 6th February 2018, whereby Notification no. KA.NI-2-138/XI-9(42)/17-UP-Act-1- 2017-Order-(101)-2018-Lucknow dated 30th January 2018 was rescinded. Notification dated 6th February 2018 reads as under:
“Notification
KA.NI.177/XI-9(42)/17-U.P. ACT-1-2017-ORDER (109)-2018,
DATED 6-2-2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services tax Act, 2017 (U.P. Act no 1 of 2017) read with section 21 of the Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 (U.P. Act no. 1 of 1904), the Governor hereby rescinds, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such rescission, the Notification no. KA.NI.-2-138/XI- 9(42)/17-U.P.Act-l-2017-Order-(101)-2018 dated 30-1-2018.”
39. Before 06.02.2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e common portal along with such other information as may be required at the common portal and a unique number will be generated on the said portal:
Provided that where goods are sent by a principal located in one State to a job worker located in any other State, the e-way bill shall be generated by tie principal irrespective of the value of the consignment:
Provided further that where handicraft goods are transported from one State in another by a person who has been exempted from the requirement of obtaining registration under clauses (i) and (ii) of section 24, the e-way bill shall be generated by the said person irrespective of the value of the consignment,
Explanation 1.-For the purposes of this rule, the expression “handicraft goods” has the meaning as assigned to it in Notification No. KA.NI.-2-1414/XI-9(15)/17-U.P. Act-1-2017- Order-(48)-2017 dated 27-09-2017 as amended from time to time.
Explanation 2.-For the purposes of this rule, the consignment value of goods shall be t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d date of the Railway Receipt or the Air Consignment Note or Bill of lading, as the case may be.
(3) Where the e-way bill is not generated under sub-rule (2) and the goods are handed over to a transporter for transportation by road, the registered person shall furnish the information relating to the transporter on the common portal and the e-way bill shall be generated by the transporter on the said portal on the basis of the information furnished by the registered person in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01:
Provided that the registered person or, the transporter, as the case may be may, at his option, generate and carry the e-way bill even if the value of the consignment is less than fifty thousand rupees:
Provided further that where the movement is caused by an unregistered person either in his own conveyance or a hired one or through a transporter, he or the transporter may, at their option, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the common portal in the manner specified in this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a unique e-way bill number (EBN) shall be made available to the supplier, the recipient and the transporter on the common portal. (5) Where the goods are transferred from one conveyance to another, the consigner or the recipient, who has provided information in Part- A of the FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter shall, before such transfer and further movement of goods, update the details of conveyance in the e-way bill on the common portal in FORM GST EWB-01:
Provided that where the goods are transported for a distance of less than ten kilometers within the State or Union Territory from the place of business of the transporter finally to the place of business of the consignee, the details of conveyance may not be updated in the e-way bill.
(5A) The consignor or the recipient, who has furnished the information in Part-A of FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter, may assign the e-way bill number to another registered or enrolled transporter for updating the information in Part-B of FORM G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

upees, the transporter shall generate FORM GST EWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case maybe, and may also generate a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 on the common portal prior to the movement of goods:
Provided that where the goods to be transported are supplied through an e-commerce operator, the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 may be furnished by such ecommerce operator.
(8) The information furnished in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 shall be made available to the registered supplier on the common portal who may utilize the same for furnishing details in FORM GSTR-1:
Provided that when the information has been furnished by an unregistered supplier or an unregistered recipient in FORM GST EWB-01, he shall be informed electronically, if the mobile number or the e-mail is available.
(9) Where an e-way bill has been generated under this rule, but goods are either not transported or are not transported as per the details furnis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ecified therein:
Provided further that where, under circumstances of an exceptional nature, the goods cannot be transported within the validity period of the e-way bill, the transporter may generate another e-way bill after updating the details in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
Explanation.-For the purposes of this rule, the “relevant date” shall mean the date on which the e-way bill has been generated and the period of validity shall be counted from the time at which the e-way bill has been generated and each day shall be counted as twenty-four hours.
(11) The details of e-way bill generated under sub-rule (1) shall be made available to the –
(a) supplier, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the recipient or the transporter; or
(b) recipient, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the supplier or the transporter,
on the common portal, and the supplier or the recipient, as the case

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ustoms;
(d) in respect of movement of such goods and within such areas in the State as the Commissioner of state tax, in consultation with the Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of central tax, may notify;
(e) where the goods, other than de-oiled cake, being transported are specified in the Schedule appended to Notification No.KA.NI-2-837/XI-9(47)/17-UP Act-1-2017- Order-(07)-2017 dated 30.6.2017 as amended from time to time;
(f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel; and
(g) where the goods being transported are treated as no supply under Schedule III of the Act.
Explanation- The facility of generation and cancellation of eway bill may also be made available through SMS.”
41. To complete the chain of the events, we may mention that UPGST (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules 2018 (hereinafter referred to as “(Fourteenth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST EWB-01, electronically, on the common portal along with such other information as may be required on the common portal and a unique number will be generated on the said portal:
Provided further that where the goods to be transported are supplied through an e-commerce operator or a courier agency, on an authorization received from the consignor, the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 may be furnished by such e-commerce operator or courier agency and a unique number will be generated on the said portal:
Provided also that where goods are sent by a principal located in one State or Union territory to a job worker located in any other State or Union territory, the e-way bill shall be generated either by the principal or the job worker, if registered, irrespective of the value of the consignment:
Provided also that where handicraft goods are transported from one State or Union territory to another State or Union territory by a person who has been exempted from the requirement o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tered person as a consignor or the recipient of supply as the consignee, whether in his own conveyance or a hired one or a public conveyance, by road, the said person shall generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 electronically on the common portal after furnishing information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
(2A) Where the goods are transported by railways or by air or vessel, the e-way bill shall be generated by the registered person, being the supplier or the recipient, who shall, either before or after the commencement of movement, furnish, on the common portal, the information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01:
Provided that where the goods are transported by railways, the railways shall not deliver the goods unless the eway bill required under these rules is produced at the time of delivery,
(3) Where the e-way bill is not generated under sub-rule (2) and the goods are handed over to a transporter for transportation by road, the registered person shall furnish the information relat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nsporter may not furnish the details of conveyance in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
Explanation 1- For the purposes of this sub-rule, where the goods are supplied by an unregistered supplier to a recipient who is registered, the movement shall be said to be caused by such recipient if the recipient is known at the time of commencement of the movement of goods.
Explanation 2.-The e-way bill shall not be valid for movement of goods by road unless the information in Part-B of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished except in the case of movements covered under the third proviso to sub-rule (3) and the proviso to sub-rule (5).
(4) Upon generation of the e-way bill on the common portal, a unique e-way bill number (EBN) shall be made available to the supplier, the recipient and the transporter on the common portal.
(5) Where the goods are transferred from one conveyance to another, the consignor or the recipient, who has provided information in Part A of the FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

assign the e-way bill number to another transporter.
(6) After e-way bill has been generated in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (1), where multiple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance, the transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 may be generated by him on the said common portal prior to the movement of goods.
(7) Where the consignor or the consignee has not generated the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 and the aggregate of the consignment value of goods carried in the conveyance is more than fifty thousand rupees, the transporter, except in case of transportation of goods by railways, air and vessel, shall, in respect of inter-State supply, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case may be, and may also generate a consolidated e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f the e-way bill:
Provided that an e-way bill cannot be cancelled if it has been verified in transit in accordance with the provisions of rule 138B:
Provided further that the unique number generated under sub-rule (1) shall be valid for a period of fifteen days for updation of Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
(10) An e-way bill or a consolidated e-way bill generated under this rule shall be valid for the period as mentioned in column (3) of the Table below from the relevant date, for the distance, within the country, the goods have to be transported, as mentioned in column (2) of the said Table:-
Sr. No.
Distance
Validity period
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Upto 100 km.
One day in cases other than Over Dimensional Cargo
2.
For every 100 km. or part thereof thereafter
One additional day other than Over Dimensional Cargo
3.
Upto 20 km.
One day in case of Over Dimensional Cargo
4.
For every 20 km. or part thereof thereafter
One additional day in case of Over Dimensional Cargo:

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

unit and which exceeds the dimensional limits prescribed in rule 93 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, made under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988).
(11) The details of the e-way bill generated under this rule shall be made available to the-
(a) supplier, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the recipient or the transporter; or
(b) recipient, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the supplier or the transporter,
on the common portal, and the supplier or the recipient, as the case may be, shall communicate his acceptance or rejection of the consignment covered by the e-way bill.
(12) Where the person to whom the information specified in subrule
(11) has been made available does not communicate his acceptance or rejection within seventy two hours of the details being made available to him on the common portal, or the time of delivery of goods whichever is earlier,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods, other than de-oiled cake, being transported, are specified in the Schedule appended to Notification No. KA.NI.-2-837/XI-9{47)/17-U.P.Act-l- 2017-Order-(07)-2017 dated 30-06-2017 as amended from time to time;
(f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel;
(g) where the supply of goods being transported is treated as no supply under Schedule III of the Act;
(h) where the goods are being transported-
(i) under customs bond from an inland container depot or a container freight station to a customs port, airport, air cargo complex and land customs station, or from one customs station or customs port to another customs station or customs port, or
(ii) under customs supervision or under customs seal;
(i) where the goods being transported are transit cargo from or to Nepal or Bhutan;
(j) where the goods being transported are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

updation and assignment of e-way bill shall be made available through SMS to the supplier, recipient and the transporter, as the case may be.”
42. Rule 1 (2) of 14th Amendment Rules, 2018 provides that the provisions in said Notification shall come into force on such date as State Government may by Notification in the gazette, appoint. In furtherance thereof, State Government has issued Notification no. KA.NI-2-498/XI-9(42)/17-UP-Act-1-2017-Order-(121)-2018-Lucknow dated 27.03.2018 appointing 01.04.2018 for giving effect to Rule 3 [other than sub-rule(7)] and rules 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 on (Fourteenth Amendments) Rules 2018. The said Notification reads as under:-
“Notification
KA.NI.-2-498/XI-9(42)/17-U.P. ACT-1-2017-ORDER-(121)-
2018, Lucknow Dated March 27, 2018
In exercise of the powers under sub-rule (2) of rule 1 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules, 2018 published with Notification No. KA.NI.-2-487/XI- 9(42)/17-U.P. GST Rules-2017, Order-(120)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hat till such time e-way bill system is developed and approved by GSTC, the Government may, by Notification, specify the documents that a person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods shall carry while the goods are in movement or in transit storage. This rule 138 in U.P. GST Rules, 2017 came into force on 29.06.2017. In furtherance of Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017, first Notification was issued by Governor on 21.07.2017 but this Notification also declares that Notification itself shall be effective from such date as Commissioner, State Tax/Commercial Tax may mention in the circular prescribing procedure of downloading the forms mentioned in the said Notification. Thus in furtherance of Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017, which came into force on 29.06.2017, first Notification though issued on 21.07.2017 but it was not made effective from that date and, on the contrary, it was to be declared by Commissioner State Tax/Commercial Tax. In furtherance of State Governm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

16.08.2017.
45. Then comes amendment by substitution of Rule 138 by Notification dated 20.09.2017. However, it was not made effective and operative since for the said purpose, Rule-1(2) of U.P. GST (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017 requires another Notification by State Government, appointing date of enforcement of substituted Rule 138.
This substituted Rule 138 as notified on 20.9.2017 was sought to be enforced with effect from 01.02.2018 by Notification dated 30.01.2018 but a glaring error was committed and instead of giving effect to Notification dated “20.09.2017”, it mentioned the date as “20.10.2017”.
Thus Notification dated 20.09.2017 did not come into effect and Rule 138 as sought to be substituted by Notification dated 20.09.2017 remained unenforced and inoperative. On 31.01.2018 UPGST (Thirteenth Amendment) Rules 2018, were published which came into force w.e.f. 23.1.2018, except otherwise provided in the Notification dated 31.01.2018. Substituted Rule 138 made by Notificatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.2.2018), were different than what was alleged to be non-possessed or obtained by Petitioners or Transporters, carrying goods in dispute by making reference to Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 and Commissioner's Circular dated 09.08.2017. Even the authorities concerned, it is evident, were not clear as to what are the correct Forms in these cases.
47. Further, it is not the case of respondents that the Forms consistent with Rule 138 made effective from 01.02.2018 were made available on the portal.
48. We also find that under Rule 138 (10) period of validity of e-way bill was clearly different than what was mentioned in Commissioner's Circulars dated 09.08.2017. Thus, Rule 138 as was brought in by Notification dated 31.01.2018 w.e.f. 01.02.2018 was operative during the period of transactions with which we are concerned in the present set of writ petitions, except writ petition no. 87 of 2018 which is governed by Rule 138, as initially enacted read with Government

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and, hence, adhered to compliance of provisions which stood already substituted by new provisions and earlier ones had become otiose. Insistence upon petitioners, at the time of issue of seizure memos and show cause notices to have downloaded E-way-bill 01 and/or 02 and its non compliance by referring to Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 read with Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 and also Rule 138 as substituted vide Government Notification dated 20.09.2017, though it was never imposed and made operative, was/is clearly erroneous and illegal.
Notification dated 31.01.2018 whereby Rule 138 was completely changed by substitution and made effective from 01.02.2018, it appears, escaped attention of authorities concerned, though it is this provision which had to be complied by petitioners. Unfortunately, authorities concerned have completely failed to observe the same. It appears that for the field authorities there was a gross chaos on account of q

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

matter of fact, never became operative. The first amendment by substitution of Rule 138 is by way of U.P. GST (Thirteenth Amendment) Rules 2018 vide Notification dated 31.01.2018 which came into force on 01.02.2018 and it continued upto 31.03.2018. Thereafter, it stands substituted by another Rule 138 vide U.P. GST (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules 2018, Notification dated 26.03.2018, made effective from 01.04.2018. Probably, the above pace of change derailed respondent authorities also in their understanding as to which provision has to be followed and implemented and what has to be observed/applied/obeyed by Petitioners and their Transporters. That is how impugned orders have been passed under a clear misconception of non-downloading of e-way bill 01 or 02, as the case may be, though under Rule 138, which had come into force on 01.02.2018, the Form(s) required to be downloaded by Dealers or Transporters are different.
53. In these peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, in our vie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te, provisions could not have been made by State Government of U.P. GST Act, 2017, hence Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017 read with Notification dated 21.07.2017 and Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 are ultra vires.
55. We have already discussed relevant provisions of various Statutes and it is evident that the provisions are pari materia. Officers of State are also competent for search, seizure and imposition of penalty in respect of violation of Central Enactments. Moreover, provisions relating to search and seizure are not for the purpose of imposition of a new liability but to regulate fiscal statutory provisions in order to avoid evasion of tax. Nothing has been placed on record to show that similar requirement of relevant documents was not provided by Central Government also in respect of inter-state transactions. There is also a principle that mere mention of a wrong provision will not make an order bad, if otherwise, power exists in the Statute. In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply