Amendments to MGST Act, 2017 [L. A. BILL No. LXXI OF 2018. Dt. 22-11-2018]

Amendments to MGST Act, 2017 [L. A. BILL No. LXXI OF 2018. Dt. 22-11-2018]
L.A. BILL No. LXXI OF 2018 Dated:- 22-11-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
In pursuance of clause (3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India, the following translation in English of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2018 (L. A. Bill No. LXXI of 2018), introduced in the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly on the 22nd November 2018, is hereby published under the authority of the Governor.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra,
RAJENDRA G. BHAGWAT,
Secretary (Legislation) to Government,
Law and Judiciary Department.

L. A. BILL No. LXXI OF 2018.
A BILL
further to amend the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
WHEREAS both Houses of the State Legislature were not in session ;
AND WHEREAS the Governor of Maharashtra was satisfied that circumstances existed which rendered it necessary for him to take immedia

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erence to the coming into force of that provision.
Amendment of section 2 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
2. In section 2 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017.) (hereinafter referred to as the “principal Act”),
(a) in clause (4), for the words “the Appellate Authority and the Appellate Tribunal” the words, brackets and figures, “the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Tribunal and the Authority referred to in sub-section (2) of section 171” shall be substituted ;
(b) in clause (16), for the words “Central Board of Excise and Customs” the words “Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs” shall be substituted ;
(c) in clause (17), for sub-clause (h), the following sub-clause shall be substituted, namely :-
“(h) activities of a race club including by way of totalisator or a license to book maker or activities of a licensed book maker in such club; and”;
(d) clause (18) shall be deleted ;
(e) in clause (35), for the word, brackets and letter “clause (c)”

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be inserted and shall always be deemed to have been inserted, namely :
“(1A) Where certain activities or transactions constitute a supply in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1), they shall be treated either as supply of goods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II.”;
(c) in sub-section (3), for the words, brackets and figures “sub-sections (1) and (2)” the words, brackets, figures and letter “sub-sections (1), (1A) and (2)” shall be substituted.
Amendment of section 9 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
4. In section 9 of the principal Act, for sub-section (4), the following subsection shall be substituted, namely:
“(4) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, specify a class of registered persons who shall, in respect of supply of specified categories of goods or services or both received from an unregistered supplier, pay the tax on reverse charge basis as the recipient of such

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

en per cent. of turnover in the State in the preceding financial year or five lakh rupees, whichever is higher.”;
(b) in sub-section (2), for clause (a), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:
“(a) save as provided in sub-section (1), he is not engaged in the supply of services;”.
Amendment of section 12 of Mah. X
6. In section 12 of the principal Act, in sub-section (2), in clause (a), the words, brackets and figure “sub-section (1) of” shall be deleted.
Amendment of section 13 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
7. In section 13 of the principal Act, in sub-section (2), the words, brackets and figure “sub-section (2) of “, at both the places where they occur, shall be deleted.
Amendment of section 16 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
8. In section 16 of the principal Act, in sub-section (2),
(a) in clause (b), for the Explanation, the following Explanation shall be substituted, namely:-
“Explanation.-For the purposes of this clause, it shall be deemed that the registered person has re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ule.”;
(b) in sub-section (5), for clauses (a) and (b), the following clauses shall be substituted, namely:-
“(a) motor vehicles for transportation of persons having approved seating capacity of not more than thirteen persons (including the driver), except when they are used for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such motor vehicles; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving such motor vehicles;
(aa) vessels and aircraft except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vessels or aircraft; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on navigating such vessels; or
(D) imparting training on flying such aircraft;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
(ab) services of general insurance, servicing, repair and maintenance in so far as they relate to motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa):
Provi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

istered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply ;
(ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre; and
(iii) travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as leave or home travel concession :
Provided that, the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available, where it is obligatory for an employer to provide the same to its employees under any law for the time being in force.”.
Amendment of section 20 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
10. In section 20 of the principal Act, in the Explanation, in clause (c), for the words and figures “under entry 84” the words, figures and letter “under entries 84 and 92A” shall be substituted.
Amendment of section 22 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
11. In section 22 of the principal Act, –
(a) in sub-section (1), after the proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
“Provided further that,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =


“Provided further that, a person having a unit, as defined in the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, (28 of 2005.) in a Special Economic Zone or being a Special Economic Zone developer shall have to apply for a separate registration, as distinct from his place of business located outside the Special Economic Zone in the same State.”;
(b) in sub-section (2), for the proviso, the following proviso shall be substituted, namely:
“Provided that, a person having multiple places of business in the State may be granted a separate registration for each such place of business, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.”.
Amendment of section 29 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
14. In section 29 of the principal Act,
(a) in the marginal note, after the word “Cancellation” the words “or suspension” shall be inserted ;
(b) in sub-section (1), after clause (c), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
“Provided that, during pendency of the proceedings relating to cancellation of reg

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

more debit notes for supplies made in a financial year” shall be substituted.
Amendment of section 35 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
16. In section 35 of the principal Act, in sub-section (5), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely :-
“Provided that, nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply to any department of the Central Government or a State Government or a local authority, whose books of account are subject to audit by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India or an auditor appointed for auditing the accounts of local authorities under any law for the time being in force.”.
Amendment of section 39 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
17. In section 39 of the principal Act,
(a) in sub-section (1),-
(i) for the words “in such form and manner as may be prescribed” the words “in such form, manner and within such time as may be prescribed” shall be substituted ;
(ii) the words “on or before the twentieth day of the month succeeding such calendar month or part thereof” shall be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the proviso, for the words “the end of the financial year” the words “the end of the financial year to which such details pertain” shall be substituted.
Insertion of section 43A in Mah. XLIII of 2017.
18. After section 43 of the principal Act, the following section shall be inserted, namely :-
Procedure for furnishing return and availing input tax credit.
“43A. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2) of section 16, section 37 or section 38, every registered person shall in the returns furnished under sub-section (1) of section 39 verify, validate, modify or delete the details of supplies furnished by the suppliers.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 41, section 42 or section 43, the procedure for availing of input tax credit by the recipient and verification thereof shall be such as may be prescribed.
(3) The procedure for furnishing the details of outward supplies by the supplier on the common portal, for the purposes of availing input tax cred

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es of sub-section (6), the recovery shall be made in such manner as may be prescribed and such procedure may provide for nonrecovery of an amount of tax or input tax credit wrongly availed not exceeding one thousand rupees.
(8) The procedure, safeguards and threshold of the tax amount in relation to outward supplies, the details of which can be furnished under sub-section (3) by a registered person,-
(i) within six months of taking registration;
(ii) who has defaulted in payment of tax and where such default has continued for more than two months from the due date of payment of such defaulted amount, shall be such as may be prescribed.”.
Amendment of section 48 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
19. In section 48 of the principal Act, in sub-section (2), after the word and figures “section 45” the words “and to perform such other functions” shall be inserted.
Amendment of section 49 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
20. In section 49 of the principal Act,
(a) in sub-section (2), for the word and fi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

contained in section 49, the input tax credit on account of State tax shall be utilised towards payment of integrated tax or State tax, as the case may be, only after the input tax credit available on account of integrated tax has first been utilised fully towards such payment.
Order of utilization of input tax credit.
49B. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Chapter and subject to the provisions of clause (e) and clause (f) of sub-section (5) of section 49, the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, prescribe the order and manner of utilisation of the input tax credit on account of integrated tax, central tax, State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, towards payment of any such tax.”.
Amendment of section 52 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
22. In section 52 of the principal Act, in sub-section (9), for the word and figures “section 37” the words and figures “section 37 or section 39” shall be substituted.
Amendment of section 54 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion (4) or, as the case may be, sub-section (5) of section 25. “.
Amendment of section 107 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
25. In section 107 of the principal Act, in sub-section (6), in clause (b), after the words “arising from the said order,” the words “subject to a maximum of twenty-five crore rupees,” shall be inserted.
Amendment of section 112 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
26. In section 112 of the principal Act, in sub-section (8), in clause (b), after the words “arising from the said order,” the words “subject to a maximum of fifty crore rupees,” shall be inserted.
Amendment of section 129 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
27. In section 129 of the principal Act, in sub-section (6) and in the proviso, for the words “seven days”, the words “fourteen days” shall be substituted.
Amendment of section 143 of Mah. XLIII of 2017.
28. In section 143 of the principal Act, in sub-section (1), in clause (b), after the proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely :-
“Provided further that, the p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

before clearance for home consumption;
(b) supply of goods by the consignee to any other person, by endorsement of documents of title to the goods, after the goods have been dispatched from the port of origin located outside India but before clearance for home consumption.”;
(ii) the existing Explanation shall be renumbered as Explanation 1 and after Explanation 1 as so renumbered, the following Explanation shall be inserted, namely:-
“Explanation 2.-For the purposes of paragraph 8, the expression “warehoused goods” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in the Customs Act, 1962. (52 of 1962.)”.
Repeal of Mah. Ord. XXII of 2018 and saving.
32. (1) The Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018, (Mah. Ord.XXII of2018.) is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken (including any notification or order issued) under the corresponding provisions of the principal Act, as amended by the said Ordinance, shall be deem

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

difficulties, it was proposed to amend the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, suitably.
3. The then proposed Amendments, inter alia, provided for the following, namely:-
(i) to amend section 7 of the Act, so as to clarify the scope of supply ;
(ii) to amend section 9 of the Act, for empowering the State Government to notify the classes of registered persons for paying the tax on reverse charge basis, in respect of receipt of supplies of certain specified categories of goods or services or both, from the unregistered suppliers ;
(iii) to amend section 10 of the Act, so as to enhance the limit of composition levy from one crore rupees to one crore and fifty lakh rupees ;
(iv) to amend section 17 of the Act, so as to specify the scope of input tax credit ;
(v) to amend section 22 of the Act, in view of the enhancement in the exemption limit for registration in the special category States from ten lakh rupees to twenty lakh rupees ;
(vi) to amend section 25 of the Act, s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ircumstances existed which rendered it necessary for him to take immediate action further to amend the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), for the purposes aforesaid, the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018 (Mah. Ord. XXII of 2018), was promulgated by the Governor of Maharashtra on the 13th October 2018.
5. The Bill is intended to replace the said Ordinance by an Act of the State Legislature.
SUDHIR MUNGANTIWAR,
Minister for Finance.
Mumbai,
dated the 19th November 2018.
MEMORANDUM REGARDING DELEGATED LEGISLATION
The Bill involves the following proposals for delegation of legislative power, namely :-
Clause 1(3).-Under this clause, power is taken to the State Government, to bring into force the provisions of the Act by notification in the Official Gazette, and appoint different dates for different sections.
Clause 13.-Under this clause, power is taken to the State Government to prescribe, by rules, the procedure for a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Timexo Fasteners India Private Ltd. And Another Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others

M/s Timexo Fasteners India Private Ltd. And Another Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others
GST
2018 (11) TMI 1504 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 3 (All.) , [2019] 63 G S.T.R. 314 (All)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 22-11-2018
Writ Tax No. – 1471 of 2018
GST
Pankaj Mithal And Ashok Kumar JJ.
For the Petitioner : Rajan Tripathi
For the Respondent : C.S.C.
ORDER
The petitioner no. 1 is a registered dealer of Kanpur in U.P. It purchased fencing wire 5.11.2018 from the Sharp Engineers, Delhi. The delivery of the fencing wire so purchased by it was to be delivered at Kanpur.
Accordingly, the invoice/builty was generated on 5.11.2018 wherein GST @ 18% was charged and paid. The goods were dispatched from Delhi through transport on 5.11.2018 along with e-way bill which was valid upto 12 p.m. of 10.11.2018.
It is alleged that the Truck Vehicle No. UP 78/ CN 5278 carrying the said consignment had left Delhi on 5.11.2018 and had reached Kanpur along with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

itioners aggrieved by the aforesaid order have preferred this petition contending that the very basis of the seizure of the goods is non existing as at the time of interception of the goods e-way bill accompanying the goods was very much valid and that only on account of delay in the issue of the memo of seizure, the time mentioned in the e-way bill expired. The seizure memo incorrectly mentions the time of interception of the goods.
In view of the above, to test and ascertain as to when actually the goods were intercepted, Sri C.B. Tripathi, Special counsel appearing for the respondents was given time on 20.8.2018 to seek instructions as to the time when the vehicle in question had entered Kanpur and was actually intercepted notwithstanding the issuance of the seizure memo on 11.11.2018.
Sri C.B. Tripathi has obtained instructions in the matter from the Assistant Commissioner (Commercial Tax) Incharge MS-XI, Kanpur. The instructions disclose that the e-way bill accompanying the good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ncharge MS-IX, Kanpur do not match with the documents which has been produced by none other than the Assistant Commissioner which clearly states that the vehicle was intercepted at 8:23 am on 11.11.2018 at Jarib Chowki Kanpur. The instructions states that the interception/checking was done at 12.30 in the night of 10.11.2018.
The averments regarding the entry of vehicle in Kanpur and the intercepting of goods as made in the writ petition have not been countered by the official of the department through the above instructions. It only states that the vehicle was checked at 12:30 in the night of 10.11.2018 at Jarib Chowki, Kanpur without uttering a single word as to when the vehicle is said to have been entered Kanpur Nagar despite fact that the specific direction was issued to the respondent to seek instructions about it.
In view of the above scenario, it can not be said that the allegation of the petitioners that the vehicle had entered Kanpur much before expiry of time mentioned in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Corrigendum in Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification No. 99/GST-2, dated 06.11.2018.

Corrigendum in Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification No. 99/GST-2, dated 06.11.2018.
101/GST-2 Dated:- 22-11-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Corrigendum
The 22nd November, 2018
No.101/GST-2.- In the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, notification No. 99/GST-2, dated the 6th November, 2018, in page 3527, in line 13, for “furnish an application to the effect”, r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Raj Kamal Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union Of India And 3 Others

M/s Raj Kamal Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union Of India And 3 Others
GST
2018 (11) TMI 1412 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 6 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 22-11-2018
Writ Tax No. – 1435 of 2018
GST
Pankaj Mithal And Ashok Kumar JJ.
For the Petitioner : Nishant Mishra,Vipin Kumar Kushwaha
For the Respondent : A.S.G.I.,Aditya Bhushan Singhal,C.S.C.
ORDER
The GST has been made applicable on premium paid on lease of property by virtue of Section 7 read with Schedule II of the Good and Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short of the Act). The two notifications no. 12 of 2017 and 32 of 2017 issued in exercise of powers under Section 11 (1) of the Act exempt service tax on one time upfront amount leviab

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2 of 2017 is exempt.
Even though the aforesaid Advance Ruling is final and conclusive, respondent no. 3 has issued notice dated 24.8.2018 for payment of GST on the premimum for leasing out of the plot allotted to the petitioner for the purposes of hospital, nursing home, diagnostic centeres etc.
Sri Aditya Bhushan Singhal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 Sri C.B. Tripathi, Special counsel appearing for respondent 3 as well as learned counsel for Union of India and the learned Standing counsel for the State of U.P., all are directed to file counter affidavit within a month. Two weeks thereafter are allowed to the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit.
List for admission/final disposal on the expiry of the above period.
Un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. TMT GRANITES (PVT) LTD. Versus THE COMMISSIONER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, TRIVANDRUM, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENT), PALAKKAD AND THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESE

M/s. TMT GRANITES (PVT) LTD. Versus THE COMMISSIONER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, TRIVANDRUM, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENT), PALAKKAD AND THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (TAXES DEPARTMENT), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (11) TMI 1360 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2019 (26) G. S. T. L. 327 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 22-11-2018
WP (C). No. 31159 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADV. SRI. PHILIP J. VETTICKATTU
For The Respondent : ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
JUDGMENT
Introduction:
Mining and quarrying, as we know, are related, yet distinct activities. One concerns the major minerals, and the other minor minerals. One involves the prospecting or extracting, the other mere excavation. Their semantic nuances apart, can we treat “quarrying” as an act of “mining”? We will answer.
Facts:
2. TMT Granites (Pvt.) Ltd

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

also the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015.
5. Sri Vettickattu has taken pains to explain that the fuel consumed for the machinery and the motor vehicles must alike be treated as the goods enjoying the tax benefit under Section 8 of the CST Act. To support his contentions he has relied on Indian Copper Corporation Ltd., v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes AIR 1965 SC 891, J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co., Ltd., v. Sales Tax Officer AIR 1965 SC 1310, Bihar Mines Ltd., v. Union of India AIR 1967 SC 887, All Kerala River Protection Council v. State of Kerala 2015 (2) KLT 78, D.K. Trivedi and Sons v. State of Gujarat AIR 1986 SC 1323.
6. Dr.Thushara James, the learned Government Pleader, on the other hand, has strenuously contended that the mining and quarrying are entirely different activities. According to her, the Government grants mining permit, whereas the Department of Geology grants quarrying permit. She has also submitted that mining concerns itself with major

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

judgments concerned themselves either with the permits granted, mostly, for mining. So those judgments, she asserts, could be distinguished. In the end, she urges the Court to dismiss the writ petition.
9. Heard Sri Philip J. Vettickattu, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Dr. Thushara James, the learned Government Pleader. Discussion:
10. The petitioner-Company, a registered dealer under the KVAT Act and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, has been engaged in quarrying and crushing of granite metals. It uses several items of machinery and motor vehicles for its quarrying operations. It claims that the machinery and the motor vehicles are “integrally connected” with its business. For its machinery and vehicles, the Company uses HSD Oil as fuel. As the Company needs huge quantities of oil, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation has allowed it to have its own filling station.
11. So the Company Wanted to take advantage of Section 8 of the CST Act. For that purpose, the Company wanted

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he goods referred to in sub-sec. (1), ”
(a)[* * * * * *]
(b) are goods of the class or classes specified in the certificate of registration of the registered dealer purchasing the goods as being intended for re-sale by him or subject to any rules made by the Central Government in this behalf, for use by him in the manufacture of processing of goods for sale or in the telecommunications network, or in mining or in the generation or distribution of electricity or any other form of power;
. . .
(italics supplied)
13. From the above provision, we can gather that a dealer gets a tax concession. To get that concession, it must fulfill certain conditions: (a) the dealer must be dealing in inter-State trade or commerce, (b) it must be selling to registered dealers goods as described in sub-section (3), and (c) it must be paying tax under the CST Act. These conditions fulfilled, the dealer can pay tax at “three per cent of its turnover or at the rate applicable to the sale or purcha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

underground excavation formed in the roof, or fault, for obtaining material for pack walls.
16. The same lexicon defines “mining” as the science, technique, and business of mineral discovery and exploitation. Strictly, “the word connotes underground work directed to severance and treatment of ore or associated rock. Practically, it includes opencast work, quarrying, alluvial dredging, and combined operations, including surface and underground attack and ore treatment.”
17. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary defines “quarry” as an open-air excavation from which stone for building, etc., is or has been obtained by cutting, blasting, etc. Any place from which stone may be extracted. The same dictionary defines “mine” as an excavation or a system of excavations in the earth for the extraction of metal, metallic ore, coal, salt, etc. Lexically, true, both “quarrying” and “mining” are distinct activities with different objectives. But the question is, does this distinction survive legis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

57, deals with the “Declaration as to the expediency of Union control”: in the public interest the Union should control and regulate the mines and develop the minerals to the extent provided in the Act. Then, Section 3(aa) inclusively defines “minerals”: all minerals except mineral oils qualify under the definition.
21. Section 3 (c) defines “mining lease”. It is a lease granted “for the purpose of undertaking mining operations, and includes a sub-lease granted for such purpose.” And, under Section 3(d), “mining operations” means any operations undertaken for winning any mineral. Indeed, under Section 15 of that Act, the State Government has the power to regulate the minor minerals. It may regulate the grant of “quarry leases, mining leases, or other mineral concessions” in respect of minor minerals and for purposes connected therewith.
22. Rule 2 (xvi) of the Kerala Minor Minerals Concession Rules 2015 defines “quarrying lease” to mean a mining lease for minor minerals granted under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

legislative history and also the federal distribution of powers on the subject: mining. Referring to the States' powers, it observes that under Section 15(1) of the 1957 Act various State Governments have made rules in respect of minor minerals. Although these rules vary from State to State, there are certain broad features present in all of them. The majority of States provide for two types of mineral concessions: a lease on tenure basis and a permit to extract a specified quantity of a minor mineral. In all the States, the rules provide for the grant of a lease for a particular term, varying from one year to twenty years. These leases are variously described in different State rules as “mining lease”, “quarrying lease” and “quarry lease”, and are similar to the mining leases granted under the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960.
26. Then, D.K. Trivedi has paid particular attention to the Gujarat Minor Mineral Rules, in the statutory backdrop of Section 15(2). The term “minerals”, as we h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) of Section 3, “mining lease”, among other things, means “a lease granted for the purpose of undertaking mining operations”. Under Clause (d) of Section 3, the expression “mining operations” means “any operations undertaken for the purpose of winning any mineral”. “Quarry”, we have already seen, is to excavate stone for building, etc. by cutting, blasting, or the like. Relying on the lexical meaning of quarrying, D.K. Trivedi has emphatically held that “quarrying minerals is, therefore, a mining operation inasmuch as it consists of an operation undertaken for the purpose of winning particular classes of minerals.”
28. Then, D.K. Trivedi refers to Clause (vi) of Rule 2 of the Gujarat Rules. That Rule defines “quarry lease” as “a kind of mining lease in respect of a minor mineral granted under these rules.” In this context, we will, here, examine Rule 2 (xvi) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015. It is, in fact, in para materia with the Gujarat Rule: “Quarrying Lease” mea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he petitioner Company is a dealer under Section 8 of the CST Act. That assertion admits of no contradiction. But the Company claims benefits under Section 8 of the CST Act. The question is whether the fuel it uses for its machinery and vehicles qualifies for that benefit, as we now accept that the Company is in mining activity.
31. The goods referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (3) of Section 8, which a registered dealer may purchase, shall be goods intended for use by him as raw materials, processing materials, machinery, plant, equipment, tools, stores, spare parts, accessories, fuel, or lubricants, in the manufacture or processing of in the telecommunications network or in mining, or in the generation or distribution of electricity or any other form of power.
32. In Indian Copper Corporation Limited, the petitioner applied to the tax authorities for registration as a dealer under the Central Sales Tax Act, setting out a list of goods for specification in the certificate of reg

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ning operations and in the manufacturing process – the two processes being interdependent – it would be impossible to exclude vehicles which are used for removing from the place where the mining operations are concluded to the factory where the manufacturing process starts. It appears that the process of mining ore and manufacture with the aid of ore copper goods is an integrated process and there would be no ground for exclusion from the vehicles those which are used for removing goods to the factory after the mining operations are concluded. Nor is there any ground for excluding locomotives and motor-vehicles used in carrying finished products from the factory. The expression “goods intended for use in the manufacturing or processing of goods for sale” may ordinarily include such vehicles as are intended to be used for removal of processed goods from the factory to the place of storage.
34. In J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills, the Supreme Court has followed Indian Copper Corp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

without that process or activity manufacture may, even if theoretically possible, be commercially inexpedient, goods intended for use in the process or activity as specified in Rule 13 will qualify for special treatment. This is not to say that every category of goods “in connection with” manufacture of or “in relation to” manufacture, or which facilitates the conduct of the business of manufacture will be included within Rule 13. Attention in this connection may be invited to a judgment of this Court in which it was held that vehicles used by a Company (which mined ore and turned out copper in carrying on activities as a miner and as manufacturer) fell within Rule 13, even if the vehicles were used merely for removing ore from the mine to the factory, and finished goods from the factory to the place of storage. Spare parts and accessories required for the effective operation of those vehicles were also held to fall within Rule 13.”
35. Veering back to the facts, I may observe that t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Maa Mundeshwari Traders Versus Union of India And 3 Others

M/s Maa Mundeshwari Traders Versus Union of India And 3 Others
GST
2018 (11) TMI 1346 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – TMI
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 22-11-2018
Writ Tax No. – 1476 of 2018
GST
Pankaj Mithal And Ashok Kumar JJ.
For the Petitioner : Aloke Kumar
For the Respondent : C.S.C., A.S.G.I.
ORDER
The petitioner is purchasing dealer of Bihar. The goods purchased by him under transportation has been seized along with vehicle on 12.11.2018. The goods have been directe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Catering Services Under B2B and B2C Models Classified Under Clause (i) of Notification No. 11/2017, As Amended.

Catering Services Under B2B and B2C Models Classified Under Clause (i) of Notification No. 11/2017, As Amended.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of services – catering services provided by the Ap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Profiteering Allegations Dismissed: Price Reductions on 'Bathing Bar' and 'Instant Drink Powder' Exceed ITC Benefits.

Profiteering Allegations Dismissed: Price Reductions on 'Bathing Bar' and 'Instant Drink Powder' Exceed ITC Benefits.
Case-Laws
GST
Profiteering – 'Bathing Bar' and 'Instant Drink Powder 50 G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Detailed analysis of the ambit and scope of clause (d) of sub-section (5) of section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [CGST Act]

Detailed analysis of the ambit and scope of clause (d) of sub-section (5) of section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [CGST Act]
By: – RameshKumar Patodia
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 21-11-2018

Goods and Services Tax, commonly known as “GST”, is a multi-stage consumption-based value added tax levied on the supply of goods and services and most acclaimed tax reforms of the century which was brought into effect from the 1st day of July '2017 upon enactment of various State and Central GST legislation for which the roadmap was laid by the Constitution (101st) Amendment Act, 2016.
The GST replaced the existing multiple cascading taxes levied both by the Centre and the State and all powerful GST Council was assigned the task of Implementation of the law. The Council prescribed five tax slabs for collection of tax viz. 0%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% including various rules and regulations.
The rationale behind introduction of GST is laid down in the Raj

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nd the GST council with the avowed objective of effective implementation has had multiple meetings and in each of these meetings various issues arising upon the implementation has been addressed though multiple issues still remain.
While no doubt it would take years for the GST law to become perfect in view of the diverse nature of the Country with several prominent sectors, Real Estate Sector is one of the sectors of the country which is gripping with multiple issues of falling sales, rising cost of inputs, labour issues, income-tax issues etc. One prominent issue which is hotly debated across the country as far as real estate sector is concerned, is the Issue of allowability of input credit towards inputs and input Services used in the construction of a Shopping complex, Mall and/or office complex. The general consensus amongst the various stakeholders seems to be that such input credit is not allowable in view of the express provisions as contained in Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rimarily, it is to be noted that Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 (hereafter referred to as Act) deals with the 'Eligibility and Conditions for taking Input Tax Credit' wherein sub section (1) states that “every registered person shall, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed and in the manner as specified in section 49, be entitled to take credit of input tax charged on supply of goods or services or both to him which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business and the said amount shall be credited to the electronic credit ledger of such person”.
On reading of the above stated provision, it is clear that subject to certain conditions, every registered person is eligible to take credit of input taxes charged on the supply of goods or services or both to him provided the goods or services –
i) are used; or
ii) Intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business
Provisions of Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act
Howe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ot eligible for being taken as credit.
Meaning of the phrase “on his own account”
Now a question arises is – what is the meaning of the phrase “on his own account”. The CGST Act nowhere defines the said phrase and therefore ordinary meaning of the said expression has to be taken. The plain and simple meaning of the said term would be “for his own purposes”. The phrase “on his own account” cannot be taken to refer to a situation where any taxable person who is engaged in any business or profession and uses the goods or services or both on his own account. This is because immediately after the phrase “on his own account”, the words “including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business” is written. Apparently if the meaning of the phrase “on his own account” is deemed to be wide enough to cover every situation of business or commerce including the situation where a real estate company is intending to utilise the Immovable property for the purpo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

when utilised by any person 'on his own account' unless the input tax credit is used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business. Therefore, what is not allowed by section 16(1) cannot be said to have been restricted via Section 17(5).
Rationale behind introduction of the provisions as contained in Section 17 of the CGST Act
Now it is to be seen as to what is the rationale behind introduction of the provisions as contained in Section 17 of the CGST Act which starts with the heading ” Apportionment of credit and blocked credit. The first four sub-sections of section 17 viz. sub-section (1) to (4) deals with the situation where the credit is apportioned between eligible and ineligible credit depending upon the utilisation of the goods and services for the purpose of any business and the other purposes and it is Section 17(5) which deals with the cases relating to the blocked credit where the input tax credit is blocked in certain situations as contained in the said

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Act
The general rule of interpretation is that there should not be additional inclusion of words while interpreting the provisions of a statute. The provisions must be construed strictly on the basis of plain language used by the legislature.
It is also well-settled principle of law that at first one has to apply "literal interpretation" and only in cases of absurd results, one has to apply "purposive interpretation”. It is well settled law that while interpreting a statute the basic principle of literal rule of interpretation has to be followed (See B. Premanand and Ors. v. Mohan Koikal and Ors. reported in 2011 (3) TMI 1590 – SUPREME COURT .
The relevant portion of the said decision is as follows:
"9. It may be mentioned in this connection that the first and foremost principle of interpretation of a statute in every system of interpretation is the literal rule of interpretation. The other rules of interpretation e.g. the mischief rule, purposive interpretatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ty “which is intended for re-sale” or seeks to block input credit in respect of an immovable property “which is intended for the purposes of leasing out”. The said interpretation will be patently against the decisions of the Apex Court cited hereinabove and will result in an absurd situation where a company which is engaged in the construction as well as rendition of Real Estate services will be denied the input tax credit in all cases since primarily a real estate company is expected to be engaged in the selling of the properties or renting of the properties and the property in such a situation may be constructed by it on its own account as it is not expected that a real estate company will know in advance the purpose for which the construction is being done i.e., for the purpose of sale or for the purpose of renting out and till such time, the decision is made whether the company will sell or rent out, the construction will always be on own account and therefore if the interpretation

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under construction property and the constructed property. Though the GST Council did not deal specifically with the issue at hand but what is to be seen is that there are disputes in the manner of taxation of real estate sector while implementing the GST Law.
In the light of the discussion hereinabove, it can be safely concluded that the phrase “own account” by any stretch of imagination cannot be interpreted to mean that it covers a situation where the property is intended to be leased out. It is not permissible to assume or intend when the intention of the law makers is very clear. Even if the purposive interpretation is applied, from a simple reading of the provisions as contained in Section 17 , it is apparent that in a situation where a movable asset after purchase is rented out then there are express provisions in Section 17 to allow the Input tax credit on purchase of the movable asset against the output taxable supply of the renting of the movable asset and thus it cannot be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hat the literal construction of a situate must be adhered to unless the context renders it plain that such a construction cannot be put on the words in question- this is what is stated in Webster's third new International Dictionary:
“Land, buildings, machinery, apparatus and fixtures employed in carrying on trade or other industrial business”
The said decision of the Apex Court was considered by Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT Lucknow-II Vs Kanodia Warehousing Corporation reported in 1979 (11) TMI 97 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT and the Hon'ble Court observed as follows:-
In order to find out if a building or a structure or part thereof constitutes “plant” the functional test must be applied. It must be seen whether the subject matter involved, that is, the building or structure or part thereof, constitutes an apparatus or a tool of the tax payer or whether it is merely a space where the tax payer carried on his business. If the building or structure or part thereof is so

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t and machinery” and “plant or machinery” cannot be taken to mean the same thing and the definition of the phrase “plant and machinery” as given in the explanation in our opinion can be applied in Chapter V and VI only where the phrase “plant and machinery” has been used and not where “plant or machinery” has been used. In this regard, it may be noted that the word “or” is normally disjunctive and “and” is normally conjunctive but at times they are read as vice versa to give effect to the manifest intention of the legislature as disclosed from the context. One does sometimes reads “or” as “and” in a statute but one does not do it unless you are obliged because “or” generally does not mean “and” and “and” does not generally mean “or”. Where provision is clear and unambiguous, the word “or” cannot be read as “and” by applying the principles of reading down (See Principles of Statutory Interpretation 13th edition 2012 Page No 485-486).
In the instant case, while section 17(5)(c) of the A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e) dated 28-06-2017 prescribes the rate of Central Tax in respect of different kinds of supply of services wherein the rate in respect of supply of renting of immovable property service has been prescribed under heading No. 9972 (Real Estate Services) as 18% (CGST and SGST).
Also, the said notification contains a table wherein in Column No. 5 restrictions in respect of utilisation of input tax credit have been prescribed in respect of certain kinds of supply of service but no such restrictions have been prescribed therein in respect of renting of immovable property service taxed under the heading Real Estate Services.
In this regard it is pertinent to note that while prescribing different bands of tax rate in respect of GST, five bands of tax rate has been prescribed viz. 0%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28%. These bands of tax rate has been prescribed on the basis of principle that 0%, 5% and 12% is in respect of essential and needy area and also where there are certain restrictions on the allo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lation to construction of immovable property against the output services of Renting in the erstwhile service tax legislation were specifically brought in indirectly by amending the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, only after catena of judgements held that the input tax paid on inputs used and construction services utilised for the construction of property used for the provision of renting services shall be allowed as cenvat credit on the pretext that renting service could not have been rendered without construction of property.
However, unlike the amended provision under the service-tax as stated herein above, there is no such express provision under the GST law.
GST law itself was introduced in order to allow seamless input credit of tax paid on input and input services used for the provision of output taxable supply and if the interpretation as being sought to be done is allowed to be done; it will be patently against the legislation itself without there being reasonable justification fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

no need to insert the phrase at all and it was sufficient to restrict the provision to “own account”. Therefore the interpretation that the taxable supply by way of renting of the property is covered within the meaning of “own account” is ruled out, unless it is read in conjunction with the phrase including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business.
Now the question arises whether when one is using the goods or services or both for the purpose of construction of an immovable property, can it be said that such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business. It is not so. The goods and services when used for the construction of an immovable property directly, they cannot simply by such usage be said to have been used in the course or furtherance of business. If the intention of the law makers was to restrict the credit in case the immovable property was used in the course or furtherance of business, then the law ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ne of the reasons given by putting this sector in the normal tax bracket of 18% by saying that the sector is now eligible for the input credit in respect of the supply of materials like cement, steel etc.
The business of a Real Estate player can be that of construction for sale, renting, leasing, time share and others. All these businesses are inextricably linked and it is difficult to carve out one from another and the analysis of the provisions has to be therefore done in the light of this.
The plain and simple interpretation of the said phrase can be to say that the said phrase seeks to disallow the input tax credit when the goods or services or both are used in the course of any business i.e., where the immovable property is used as a space for the purpose of running the business.
Recently, one writ petition has been filed in Karnataka High Court on this issue and is awaiting the judgement.
Conclusion:
Across the globe, in similar situations VAT on construction cost is eligibl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC ON FACTORY BUILDING GOODS AND LABOUR CHARGES

ITC ON FACTORY BUILDING GOODS AND LABOUR CHARGES
Query (Issue) Started By: – SAFETAB LIFESCIENCE Dated:- 21-11-2018 Last Reply Date:- 21-11-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
Please advise us whether we can take ITC on the following different cases
1. Investment on Factory Building on purchase of Building construction materials and booked in Fixed Assets
2. Investment on Admin Building on purchase of Building construction materials and booked in Fixed Assets A/c.
3. Investment on Factory Building on payment of Labour charges and booked in Fixed Assets A/c.
4. Investment on Admin Building on payment of Labour charges and booked in Fixed Assets A/c.
5. Expenses on Factory Building repairs o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

By YAGAY andSUN:
The Reply:
ITC on Civil Structure is not allowed. For details, please refer Section 17(5) of the CGST Act.
Reply By Ramaswamy S:
The Reply:
ITC not eligible as per Section 17(5) of CGST Act. Further there is a recent Advance Ruling by Telangana on the matter.
Regards
S.Ramaswamy
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
I endorse the views of both experts Shri Yagay and Ramasamy.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Reproducing extract of exclusion clause.
Sec 17(5)(c) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service;
(d) goods or services or both received by a ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Warranty Charges received from supplier outside India

Warranty Charges received from supplier outside India
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kaustubh Karandikar Dated:- 21-11-2018 Last Reply Date:- 6-1-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
XYZ(India) importing goods from PQR (Japan) which is a parent company. During warranty period, if any defect is found in these goods, PQR is paying the warranty charges to XYZ. Is XYZ liable to pay GST on it? If yes under which provisions?
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CHELLAPERUMAL VAIKUNDASEKAR PROPRIETOR, AYYA VAIKUNDA TRADERS Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. III, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

CHELLAPERUMAL VAIKUNDASEKAR PROPRIETOR, AYYA VAIKUNDA TRADERS Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. III, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI
GST
2019 (1) TMI 140 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2019] 63 G S.T.R. 204 (Ker)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-11-2018
WP (C). No. 31227 of 2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADVS. SRI. K. M. FIROZ, AH

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction.
(iii) To declare that re-processed plastic mats (RP Mats or RP Plastic Mats for short) comes under HSN code No.4601 of Customs Tarriff Act, 1975.
(iv) To declare that Sections 129 and 130 of Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and related provisions the Rules made relating to that are unreasonable, arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution of India.
(v) To declare that Rule 138 of Kerala Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 are ultra vires Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s and Service Tax Act, 2017 after the lapse of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Ordinance, 2017.
(ix) To issue a direction to the respondents not to implement or not to insist on Rule 140 of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and Form GST INS-04 prescribed there under and to keep in abeyance of the same by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order.”
3. The learned Division Bench of this Court in Renji Lal Damodaran Vs. State Tax Officer Judgment dated 6.8.18 in W.A.No.1640/2018 has dealt with an identical issue.
4. Applying the ratio of that judgment, I direct the respondent authorities to release the petitioner's goods and vehicle on his “f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

DINDA ANTES Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES KERALA STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONERKERALA STATE GST DEPARTMENT, TRICHUR, THE STATE TAX OFFICER, TRICHUR, THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK PVT. LTD AND

DINDA ANTES Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES KERALA STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONERKERALA STATE GST DEPARTMENT, TRICHUR, THE STATE TAX OFFICER, TRICHUR, THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK PVT. LTD AND GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL, NEW DELHI
GST
2018 (12) TMI 137 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2019] 61 G S.T.R. 398 (Ker)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-11-2018
WP(C). No. 36026 of 2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADVS. SRI. SOJAN JAMES AND SHRI. SIVANKUTTY S.
For The Respondents : ADV. SRI. P. R. SREEJITH, SC, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK AND THUSHARA JAMES, GP
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, has now

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ar outlines the procedure the Nodal Officers is to follow. It reads:
5. Nodal officers and identification of issues
5.1 GSTN, Central and State government would appoint nodal officers in requisite number to address the problem a taxpayer faces due to glitches, if any, in the Common Portal. This would be publicized adequately.
5.2 Taxpayers shall make an application to the field officers or the nodal officers where there was a demonstrable glitch on the Common Portal in relation to an identified issue, due to which the due process as envisaged in law could not be completed on the Common Portal.
5.3 Such an application shall enclose evidences as may be needed for an identified issue to establish bona fide attempt on the part of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Officer for the issue resolution.
5. So, in this case also, the petitioner may apply to the additional sixth respondent Nodal Officer. The petitioner applying, the Nodal Officer will look into the issue and facilitate the petitioner's uploading FORM GST TRAN-1, without reference to the time-frame. Ordered so.
6. I may also observe that if the petitioner applies within two weeks after receiving this judgment, the Nodal Officer will consider it and take steps within a week thereafter. If the uploading of FORM GST TRAN-1 is not possible for reasons not attributable to the petitioner, the authority will also enable it to take credit of the input tax available at the time of its migration.
With these directions, I dispose of the Writ Petitio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

T.M. ABOOBUKKAR AND KHALEEL RAHIMAN Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. VII, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SE

T.M. ABOOBUKKAR AND KHALEEL RAHIMAN Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. VII, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI
GST
2018 (12) TMI 136 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-11-2018
WP(C). No. 28414 of 2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioners : ADVS. SRI. K. M. FIROZ AND SMT. M. SHAJNA
For The Respondents : ADVS GOVERNMENT PLEADER DR. THUSHARA JAMES ASSISTANT SOLICITO

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the goods detained by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction.
(iii) To declare that Sections 129 and 130 of Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and related provisions the Rules made relating to that are unreasonable, arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution of India.
(iv) To declare that Rule 138 of Kerala Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 are ultra vires Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and unconstitutional.
(v) To declare that Section 126(6) of the KSGST Act as well as CGST Act insofar as it ove

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sue a direction to the respondents not to implement or not to insist on Rule 140 of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and Form GST INS-04 prescribed there under and to keep in abeyance of the same by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order.”
3. The learned Division Bench of this Court in Renji Lal Damodaran Vs. State Tax Officer1 has dealt with an identical issue.
4. Applying the ratio of that judgment, I direct the respondent authorities to release the petitioners' goods and vehicle on their “furnishing Bank Guarantee for tax and penalty found due and a bond for the value of goods in the form as prescribed under Rule 140(1) of the CGST Rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Commissioner of Central GST Mumbai – West Versus Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd.,

The Commissioner of Central GST Mumbai – West Versus Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd.,
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 1395 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – TMI
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-11-2018
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2018
Service Tax
AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
Mr. Sham Walve, for the Appellant.
Mr. Bharat Raichandani with Ms. Pragya i/b. UBR Lergal, for the Respondent.
P.C:
This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Appeal Act, 1944 (the Act), challenges the order dated 16th November, 2016 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2. The Revenue urges the only the following question of law for our consideration:
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Nashik Versus Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.,

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Nashik Versus Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.,
Central Excise
2018 (11) TMI 1287 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – TMI
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-11-2018
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 28 OF 2018
Central Excise
AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. J. B. Mishra, for the Appellant.
Ms. Padmavati Patil with Mr. Anil Wani i/b. ANS Law Associates, for the Respondent
P.C:
This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act), challenges the order dated 18th May, 2017 passed by the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2. Revenue urges the following questions of law, for our consideration:
“(a) Whether in the facts and in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

assifiable under Chapter 8702.00 while it the Revenue's contention that its is appropriately classifiable under head 8703.00 of the Tariff Act.
4. The questions as proposed by the Revenue arises out of an order of the Tribunal which essentially deal with an issue of appropriate classification. Therefore, an Appeal under Section 35G of the Act from an order on classification, is not maintainable before this Court.
5. In fact, Apex Court in Navin Chemicals Mfg. & Trading Co. Ltd., v/s. Collector of Customs 2002 TIOL 460 has held that a dispute as to classification of goods directly relates to the rate of duty for purposes of assessment. Further, this Court in APM Terminals (I) Pvt. Ltd., v/s. Commissioner of Central Excise 2018 TIOL 189

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

“Business Support Service” with Back Office and Accounting is not Zero Rated u/s 16 IGST Act 2017.

“Business Support Service” with Back Office and Accounting is not Zero Rated u/s 16 IGST Act 2017.
Case-Laws
GST
Supply of Services – supply of “Business Support Service' comprising of 'Back

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Credit Note u/s 34

Credit Note u/s 34
Query (Issue) Started By: – sunil jain Dated:- 20-11-2018 Last Reply Date:- 2-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
As per section 34(2) of CGST Act, any registered person who issues Credit Note(CN), shall declare the details of such CN in the return for the month during which CN has been issued but not later than September following the end of the FY in which supply was made.
Say if supply of good was made in March 2018, and goods are returned back in October, does it mean CN can not be issued in Oct or so?
Pl clarify.
Thanks,
CA. R.K. Aggarwal
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
As per the provisions of law it is yes. But some clarifications have to be issued in this regard

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

then vat was not allowed to be reversed. In some state it was one year. Since GST is consolidaicon of erstwhile law then I doubt that GST Council will allow to take benefit on the sales return after September month of subsequent financial year.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
There is legal force in the views Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji. What I want to say voice should be raised before GST Council on the ground that there must be no restriction of time factor for sales return. Supplied goods should be allowed to return directly or indirectly at any time.
Reply By CASusheel Gupta:
The Reply:
You can ask your customer to send the goods on Tax Invoice instead of on delivery challan and issue of credit note.
Discussion Forum – Knowledge

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on Rental Income

GST on Rental Income
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ethirajan Parthasarathy Dated:- 20-11-2018 Last Reply Date:- 28-11-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 7 Replies
GST
Due to litigation between landlord of commercial property & tenant, the rents were not received. Civil suit for eviction is likely to be filed.
Is landlord liable to pay GST under the above circumstances.
One view could be that the landlord has to pay GST atleast to the extent of rental deposit already received. Is this view correct. What will be the situation after fully setting off the rental deposit.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
This is an extract of FAQ dated 31.3.17
Q4. What are the necessary elements that constitute supply under CGST/SGST Ac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rate what will be the position after rental deposit is fully adjusted & tenant has neither vacated nor paying rent
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
There is not an iota of doubt about leviability of GST on rental deposit. It is an advance. Dr.Govindarajan Sir has rightly opined.
Reply By YAGAY andSUN:
The Reply:
It will be treated as payments made in advance (i.e.deposits) and adjust accordingly. Hence liable for charging of GST.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
When the deposit was received it was not taxable as it was not for the service rendered or to be rendered. But when it is adjusted against the rent to be receivable but not received then it looses its identity as a deposit and it takes the name of rent. Hence, when th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

E-way bill for goods send for at exhibition not for sale

E-way bill for goods send for at exhibition not for sale
Query (Issue) Started By: – Pramod Jadhav Dated:- 20-11-2018 Last Reply Date:- 21-11-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
I am holding Gst Registeration in maharashtra state as composition taxable person, i have to send goods for at exhibition held in another state i.e. Calcutta so how can i send goods through transport is E-way bill compulsary or i can send through delivery challan. and if i can send through de

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Examination for Confirmation of Enrollment of GST Practitioners Postponed to 17.12.2018

Examination for Confirmation of Enrollment of GST Practitioners Postponed to 17.12.2018
GST
Dated:- 20-11-2018

Reference is invited to Press Release dated 1.11.2018 regarding exam for GS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Orders Revenue Authorities to Correct Mistaken SGST Remittance to IGST, Easing Fund Transfer Process.

High Court Orders Revenue Authorities to Correct Mistaken SGST Remittance to IGST, Easing Fund Transfer Process.
Case-Laws
GST
Remittance of amount under the head 'SGST', instead of 'IGST' –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s PYRAMID INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

M/s PYRAMID INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
GST
2019 (3) TMI 149 – DELHI HIGH COURT – TMI
DELHI HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 20-11-2018
w. p. (C) no. 10999 of 2018 C. M. Appl. Nos. 42815, 42816 And 48246 of 2018
GST
MR  SANJIV KHANNA AND MR ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, JJ.
For The Petitioner : Mr.Abhishek A. Rastogi and Ms.Rashmi Deshpande, Advocates
For The Applicant : Mr.Atul Kumar and Mr.Harshit Sanwal, Advocates
For The Respondents : Mr.Vinod Diwakar, CGSC Mr.Amit Bansal, Sr. Standing Counsel And Ms.Gargi Sethi, Advocate for respondent
ORDER
C.M. APPL. No. 42816/2018 (Exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application disposed of.
W.P.(C) No. 10999/2018
Counsel for th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, 2018. Rs. 7.16 crores was paid in cash in August, 2017 and Rs. 5.39 crores was paid through input tax credit. No tax has been paid thereafter. It is stated that the last instalment was accounted for making adjustment against input tax credit. In other words, total amount paid in cash or input tax credit was Rs. 12.56 crores.
3. Counsel for respondents state that the total amount collected from VAT/buyers under the GST regime is Rs. 18.37 crores.
4. Our attention has also been drawn to the letter dated 05.10.2018 written by the petitioner wherein it is recorded that the petitioner had offered to pay an amount of Rs. 5,11,60,450/- to resolve the issue amicably with the customers.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this fi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ANDHRA ORGANICS LIMITED Versus CCT, VISAKHAPATNAM GST

ANDHRA ORGANICS LIMITED Versus CCT, VISAKHAPATNAM GST
Central Excise
2019 (2) TMI 434 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 20-11-2018
APPLICATIONs No. E/ROM/30722-30723/2018 In APPEAL Nos. E/30445-30446/2018 – M/30580 – 30581/2018
Central Excise
Mr. P. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri M. Rajendran, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri C. Mallikarjuna Reddy, Superintendent /AR for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: Mr. P.V. Subba Rao
1. These applications for rectification of mistake were filed by the applicant against the Final Order No. A/30750-30751/2018, dated 24.07.2018 on the following grounds:
a) At the time of hearing of the appeals, the Counsel submitted that the Order-in-Appeal for t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d on merits. I have not found any evidence to support either argument. Be that as it may, the earlier order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is not a binding precedent on the CESTAT and therefore an independent decision can be taken in this regard”.
On the second question of binding precedence of the CESTAT's decision as claimed by the applicant, the final order specifically relied on the ratio of the judgments of Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Manikgarh Cement [2010(20) STR 456 (Bom.)] and the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki Limited [2009(240) ELT 641 (SC)], while deciding the matter.
3. I, therefore, find that there is no error apparent on record calling for rectification of mistake.
4. The applic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. MUTHOOS ENTERPRISES Versus COMMISSIONER OF GST & CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI

M/s. MUTHOOS ENTERPRISES Versus COMMISSIONER OF GST & CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI
Central Excise
2019 (2) TMI 254 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 20-11-2018
E/42093/2018 – FINAL ORDER NO. 42920/2018
Central Excise
Smt. Sulekha Beevi C.S, Judicial Member
For the Appellant: Shri S. Jayanth, Cons.
For the Respondent: Shri L. Nandakumar, AC (AR)
ORDER
The brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Bitumen Emulsion and were availing the facility of SSI exemption as per Notification No.8/2003-CE., dated 01.03.2003 till 2010-11. They got registered with Central Excise department from 18.01.2012. On verification of invoices issued by the appellants for the financial year 2011-12, it was noticed that their aggregate value of clearances had reached Rs. 150 lakhs on 12.09.2011 and that they are not eligible for SSI exemption for the financial year 2011-12. They had cleared excisable goods valued at Rs. 68,09,255/- without payin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

matter. He submitted that the main raw material used for the manufacture is Bitumen procured from the oil industries namely, IOCL, BPCL and HPCL. The appellants were availing SSI exemption till 2010-11 as their clearances was below Rs. 150 lakhs. However, it was omitted to notice by oversight that the clearances had exceeded Rs. 150 lakhs on 31.10.2011. It was detected by the appellants themselves and have issued a letter to the department dated 18.01.2013 explaining their clearances have exceeded the prescribed limit and, therefore, they have got registered for payment of Central Excise duty. In such letter, the appellants had given the details of clearances as well as the credit eligible on inputs. The details of 50 invoices as to the eligibility of input for adjustment to the duty liability for the disputed period of 2011-12 was clearly stated in the detailed letter. In the letter dated 18.01.2013, issued to the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner, the appellants had given tabula

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ome out of the SSI exemption. The appellants believed that the audit party was satisfied that there is no duty liability for the period 2011-12.
3. To the surprise of the appellants', a show-cause notice dated 22.08.2016 was issued invoking extended period, alleging suppression of facts and demand of duty of Rs. 9,81,894/-. The appellants contested the demand and submitted the invoices on which credit was available. They had submitted 36 invoices on which the credit of Rs. 3,73,607/- was worked out by the adjudicating authority. Due to the Wardha Cyclone in 2016, the appellants had lost some of the invoices and could not produce the entire invoices. Though, the appellants had pleaded that the invoices were produced before the audit party and that audit had not raised any objection, it was not considered by the original authority. At the time of hearing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), the appellants had put forward these contentions and also contested the disallowance

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

de letter dated 18.01.2013 giving all details with regard to duty liability for the clearances made in 2011-12. The appellants themselves have furnished such details. The demand then made after more than two years alleging suppression of facts cannot sustain. Further, that the audit party had visited the premises and verified all documents in 2013 and had not raised any objection. He, therefore, pleaded that the extended period invoked is incorrect and not sustainable.
5. The learned Authorised Representative Shri L. Nandakumar supported the findings in the impugned order. Admittedly, the appellants exceeded the SSI limit during the period 2011-12. They have taken registration only on 18.01.2012 and have started paying the duty only from such date. The appellants were able to produce the entire invoices to support their claim of Cenvat credit. The authorities below have given assessments of credit of all the invoices produced by the appellants. Therefore, the demand is legal and prope

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

18.01.2012. Since then, they have been discharging the excise duty after availing Cenvat Credit. The department had sent an audit party as per letter of the audit party, dated 10.06.2013, the appellants have furnished all the details with regard to the original sales and purchase invoices for the year 2011-12. The appellants have produced all the documents before the audit party. It is seen that the audit party had pointed out only the ineligibility of credit on Steel Roofing to an amount of Rs. 23,084/-. The appellants had rectified the objection by paying up the wrongly availed credit along with interest. The audit party also after verification of amounts had not raised any objection with regard to the adjustment of Cenvat Credit towards the duty liability for the period 2011-12. This leads to the strong inference that audit party did not find any short-payment of duty. Interestingly, the show-cause notice is issued after more than two years invoking the extended period alleging sup

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =