T.M. ABOOBUKKAR AND KHALEEL RAHIMAN Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. VII, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SE

T.M. ABOOBUKKAR AND KHALEEL RAHIMAN Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. VII, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI – 2018 (12) TMI 136 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI – Detention of goods with vehicle – misclassification in tax rate – Held that:- The respondent authorities are directed to release the petitioners' goods and vehicle on their “furnishing Bank Guarantee for tax and penalty found due and a bond for the value of goods in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1st respondent and to set aside the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ direction or order. (ii) To direct the 1st respondent to release the goods and vehicle covered by Exhibit P4 and P4(a) issued by the 1st respondent unconditionally after retaining a sample of the goods detained by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction. (iii) To declare that Sections 129 and 130 of Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and related provisions the Rules made relating to that are unreasonable, arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution of India. (iv) To declare that Rule 138 of Kerala Good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ule 140 of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 issued under Kerala Goods and Service Tax Ordinance, 2017, is not enforceable after the enactment of Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 after the lapse of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Ordinance, 2017. (viii) To issue a direction to the respondents not to implement or not to insist on Rule 140 of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and Form GST INS-04 prescribed there under and to keep in abeyance of the same by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order. 3. The learned Division Bench of this Court in Renji Lal Damodaran Vs. State Tax Officer1 has dealt with an identical issue. 4. Applying t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply