Supply of Goods Vs. Supply of Services in GST: Test of Constitutional Validity

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – Bimal jain – Dated:- 8-9-2016 Last Replied Date:- 9-9-2016 – Dear Professional Colleague, Supply of Goods Vs. Supply of Services in GST: Test of Constitutional Validity Owing to the federal structure of India, where there are two taxing authorities – the Central Government and the State Government(s), the Country has witnessed overlapping of powers of the State Government(s) and the Central Government. Even though the current indirect tax system treats goods and services differently, in certain cases where goods and services with other types of supplies are being packaged as composite bundles & offered for sale to consumers under a variety of supply-chain arrangements, there is double taxation. This is evident in the following exemplary cases: Excise Vs. Service Tax: Drawings and designs, Commissioning and installations, Software etc. Service Tax Vs. VAT: AC Restaurant services, Works contract, Construction Services Right to use of movable good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iness assets with or without consideration Sale of business assets by any other person to recover debt Goods forming part of business assets on ceasing to be a taxable person Supply of goods by an unincorporated association to its members Matters to be treated as supply of services: Transfer of right to use goods Lease, tenancy, easement, licence to occupy land Lease or letting out of building Job work on others' goods Personal use/making available for non-commercial use of business assets Renting of immovable property Construction of a complex, building, civil structure or a part thereof, including a complex or building intended for sale to a buyer, wholly or partly, except where the entire consideration has been received after issuance of completion certificate, where required, by the competent authority or before its first occupation, whichever is earlier Temporary transfer or permitting the use or enjoyment of any intellectual property right Development, design, programming, cu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

T Law which has been for ages, marred the current tax regime. But, threadbare analyses of the same would reveal that the settlement of goods vs. services may not fade away so easily in GST when the Schedule II is tested on the scale of constitutional validity. Few of such important points are summarised as under: Is it constitutionally valid to treat intangibles as services? The Model GST Law has made it explicit that intangibles would be treated as supply of services (as per definition of services under Section 2(88) of the Model CGST/SGST Act, 2016), while the same has been excluded from the definition of goods given under Section 2(48) of the Model CGST/SGST Act, 2016. However, the definition of goods given under Article 366(12) of the Constitution of India is defined in inclusive manner to provide that goods includes all materials, commodities, and articles , and even there are settled judgments of the Hon ble Supreme Court to provide that this inclusive definition of goods incorpo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s service , when the Constitution does not allow so. In case, tax is levied on the basis of definition provided in Model GST Law, it would tantamount to defiance of sanctity of the Constitution, which is ultra-virus. Packaged software – whether goods or services? Even if the bifurcation of goods and services created in Model GST Law by virtue of Schedule II is accepted (leaving aside the contraction with the Constitutional provisions), still there are certain matters where litigation may continue such as likely issue of dispute in case of packaged software (i.e. software provided in physical forms like CD/DVD, etc.), where a contrary view might be possible contending that by supplying software on CDs (being tangible property), the intention is to supply the software essentially (being intangible property) and not the CDs etc. Deemed sale of goods concept in the Constitution Vs. Schedule II As per Article 366(29A) of the Constitution, certain items such supply of food or any other artic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ber thereof for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration; (f) a tax on the supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or any drink (whether or not intoxicating), where such supply or service, is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, and such transfer, delivery or supply of any goods shall be deemed to be a sale of those goods by the person making the transfer, delivery or supply and a purchase of those goods by the person to whom such transfer, delivery or supply is made. While the 122nd Constitutional Amendment Bill, 2014 has chosen to continue with Article 366(29A) of the Constitution (as against 115th Constitutional Amendment Bill, 2011 wherein it was proposed to be deleted), on the contrary, as per the Model GST Law, the same i.e. AC Restaurant Services and Works Contract has been deemed to be as supply of services in terms of Schedule II to the Mo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =