Central lacked jurisdiction under Secs 6(1) and 6(2)(b); Sec 74 proceedings void after State action; Sec 70 summons not rival

Central lacked jurisdiction under Secs 6(1) and 6(2)(b); Sec 74 proceedings void after State action; Sec 70 summons not rivalCase-LawsGSTHC allowed the petition and quashed the show-cause notice dated 13.08.2021 issued by the Central Proper Officer and se

Central lacked jurisdiction under Secs 6(1) and 6(2)(b); Sec 74 proceedings void after State action; Sec 70 summons not rival
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petition and quashed the show-cause notice dated 13.08.2021 issued by the Central Proper Officer and set aside the Order-in-Original dated 30.01.2025. The court held that, by virtue of Section 6(1) and the bar in Section 6(2)(b) of the GST Act, the Central Proper Officer lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Section 74 after the State Proper Officer had earlier commenced intelligence-based enforcement; summons under Section 70 did not amount to initiation of rival “proceedings.” Consequently, the Central-originated proceedings are non est ab initio and the resultant order cannot be sustained. Petition allowed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =