Para 2 (H) – Draft-Bills-Reports – Business Processes for GST on Refund Process – Report on – Business Processes for GST on Refund Process – [August 2015] – Para 2 (H) – 2(H) REFUND OF CARRY FORWARD INPUT TAX CREDIT: i) As stated earlier, ITC is allowed to remove cascading and under modern VAT laws, tax is charged on value addition only and tax is not charged on tax. It is for this reason that the ultimate consumer is liable to bear the tax burden. ii) It is noted that the ITC may accumulate on account of the following reasons : a) Inverted Duty Structure i.e. GST on output supplies is less than the GST on the input supplies; b) Stock accumulation; c) Capital goods; and d) Partial Reverse charge mechanism for certain services. iii) As rega
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
edit has been matched from the purchase and sales statements filed along with monthly returns. The refund would be granted on submission of application. It may be mentioned, however, that presently the Centre does not grant refund in such cases. vi) Two options i.e. blocking the utilization of input tax credit claimed as refund at the time of submission of application for refund itself or debiting the input tax credit account/cash ledger subject to the amount available in either account at the time of issuance of sanction order of refund were discussed. It is recommended that the first option should be adopted. Suitable linkage between the refund application and blocking of the carry forward input tax credit in the return/cash ledger should
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =