Judicial Review Finds Demand Order Defective, Mandates Procedural Correction and Fair Hearing for Petitioner Under Section 75(6)

Judicial Review Finds Demand Order Defective, Mandates Procedural Correction and Fair Hearing for Petitioner Under Section 75(6)Case-LawsGSTHC determined that the undated demand order was procedurally defective under Section 75(6), lacking substantive rea

Judicial Review Finds Demand Order Defective, Mandates Procedural Correction and Fair Hearing for Petitioner Under Section 75(6)
Case-Laws
GST
HC determined that the undated demand order was procedurally defective under Section 75(6), lacking substantive reasoning beyond referencing a show cause notice. The court remanded the matter to the respondent, directing them to provide the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the original show cause notice within four weeks. Following the pet

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =