GST Registration Cancelled Under Section 29(2)(e) After Business Failed to Prove Actual Premises Occupancy

GST Registration Cancelled Under Section 29(2)(e) After Business Failed to Prove Actual Premises OccupancyCase-LawsGSTHC upheld cancellation of petitioner’s registration under Section 29(2)(e) due to fraudulent misrepresentation of business premises. Desp

GST Registration Cancelled Under Section 29(2)(e) After Business Failed to Prove Actual Premises Occupancy
Case-Laws
GST
HC upheld cancellation of petitioner's registration under Section 29(2)(e) due to fraudulent misrepresentation of business premises. Despite presenting electricity bills and leave/license agreement, petitioner failed to substantiate actual occupancy through proof of license fee payments or utility charges. Petitioner's inaction in responding to show cause notice, non-appearance before appellate authority, and failure to challenge Bureau of Investigation's spot visit findings proved detrimental. Court found proper officer's inference plausible based on available evidence. The registration cancellation order was deemed neither perverse nor unsupported by evidence, leading to dismissal of writ petition challenging the cancellation order.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =