The applicant had suppressed material facts from the Authority for Advance Ruling by mis-declaring that…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The applicant had suppressed material facts from the Authority for Advance Ruling by mis-declaring that the issue was not pending in any other proceedings, when in fact, proceedings on the same issue had already commenced b

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The applicant had suppressed material facts from the Authority for Advance Ruling by mis-declaring that the issue was not pending in any other proceedings, when in fact, proceedings on the same issue had already commenced by the DGGI. Upon being informed of this by the Appellant, the Authority for Advance Ruling declared the Ruling void ab initio u/s 104 of the Act. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Appellant before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling against the void Ruling became infructuous and was dismissed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =