Tax demand discrepancies led to unlawful property attachment despite pre-deposit made, prompting court relief.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing the release of attachment over immovable properties due to discrepancies between GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A. Despite making the requisite 10% pre-

Tax demand discrepancies led to unlawful property attachment despite pre-deposit made, prompting court relief.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing the release of attachment over immovable properties due to discrepancies between GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A. Despite making the requisite 10% pre-deposit of the disputed tax demand, the attachment was effected contrary to statutory provisions. The court held that once the pre-deposit is m

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =