Impact under GST on Job work transactions

Goods and Service Tax – GST – By: – ashish chaudhary – Dated:- 5-9-2015 Last Replied Date:- 7-9-2015 – Goods and Service Tax (GST) upcoming in India is likely to result in widening the tax base substantially by covering large number of potential taxpayers who are hitherto not covered in the tax net either due to their activity not being in the nature of taxable or due to some exemption being claimed. It is talked that the present assessee base on Central side itself is expected to rise to approximately 60 lacs assessees from existing base of apprx. 15 lacs. One of major contributor in this rise would be job workers who may not be required to get registered under present taxation system. The paper writer has analysed impact on job workers in the proposed GST regime viz a viz current taxation system. The manufacturing industries now-a-days stick to their core competencies and get most jobs done on outsourced basis. The sending of raw materials/semi-finished materials for some process as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e job worker/ so as to complete a part or whole of the process resulting in the manufacture or finishing of an article or any operation which is essential for the aforesaid process. If one were to go by the definition of the term job work , it is evident the raw materials have to be supplied by another person. In Prestige Engineering India Ltd v CCE Meerut, – 1994 (9) TMI 66, the Supreme Court held that when the job worker contributed his own material to the goods supplied by the customer and engaged in manufacturing, the activity was not one of job work. However, minor additions by the job worker would not take away the fact that the activity was one of job work. B. Job Work and Manufacture (under Central Excise) Since excise duty is on manufacture , duty liability arises only when the goods are manufactured during job work. The test as to whether the process amounts to manufacture or not would be determined as per section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944 which defines manufacture as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e required to charge duty of excise. The goods must be used in manufacturing process by principal manufacturer which should result in a dutiable product being manufactured on which duty of excise is being charged. The activity undertaken by job worker would not be liable to service tax also as any process amounting to manufacture or production of goods is covered by Negative list. Process does not amount to manufacture:Where the processing undertaken by the job worker does not amount to manufacture, the said job worker could be liable to service tax.But before determining the same, one need to examine the exemption provided in Notification No. 25/2012 ST 20.06.2012 (called as Mega Exemption Notification). As per the said Notification, job work in relation of any goods on which appropriate duty is payable by the principal manufacturer, is exempted. Appropriate duty means duty payable on manufacture or production under a Central Act or a State Act, but shall not include Nil rate of duty

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h provides for valuation as follows: Goods directly sold from job worker premise:Where the goods are sold by the raw material supplier/principal manufacturer from the factory of job worker – the value would have to be the transaction value of the goods so sold by the raw material supplier/principal. This will apply only when the raw material supplier and the buyer of the goods are not related and price is the sole consideration for the sale and the goods are sold for delivery at the time of removal from the job worker's factory. Illustration: Let the value of raw materials supplied by principal be ₹ 1,00,000 and the job workers conversion cost be ₹ 15,000 and his profit margin be ₹ 5,000. If the principal sells the goods processed by the job worker at ₹ 1,50,000. Then assessable value would be ₹ 1,50,000 (that is the price charged by the principal for sale of the processed goods). Goods not sold from job worker premise: In a case where the goods are no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s works contract, value would be arrived at as per options provided under Rule 2A of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006. 2. Provisions under CST/VATAct A. Interstate job work:The goods may be sent outside state for job work.In the absence of any sale, there would be no liability on principal manufacturer to charge CST. The material may be sent along with a declaration that the goods have been sent on job work. The work undertaken by job worker may or may not involve use of material. Where no material is used, there is no liability to charge CST as there is no transfer of property involved.When the job worker uses materials there would be a transfer of property in goods involved and the transaction would be taxable. The taxability would depend upon the following: Material Billed separately: This would be a divisible contract in which job worker would charge the applicable CST on the materials transferred by him. He would also bill pure labour charges. In such cases the wor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ood clearly to be service by the Court s by applying dominant motive test and consequently there is no liability to charge CST. B. Job work within state: Where principal manufacturer and job worker are located within same state, there would be no liability on principal manufacturer to charge VAT in the absence of sales. The liability charge VAT would be same as discussed above in case of interstate job works. 3. Applicability of GST on job work Having discussed the impact under Central Excise, Service Tax and CST/VAT, now we shall discuss the taxability under proposed GST regime. The taxable events under present laws are manufacture (Central Excise), provision of service (Service Tax) and sale (CST/VAT) respectively for applicability of different kind of taxes. Under proposed GST regime, all these concepts would lose relevance and the taxable event would only be supply of goods and supply of services . The goods supplied by principal supplier to job worker would be supply of goods char

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rd. Similarly, job worker may charge duty based on intrinsic value of goods in the form in which it is supplied by him after processing. This can be done based on the price at which supplied by principal supplier + his job work charges (including material and labour). Nature of taxes and credit: In case of job work within state, both principal supplier and job worker would be required to charge CGST and SGST. In case of inter-state movement, IGST would be charged. The tax charged by one party would be eligible as credit to another which may be adjusted against discharging their output liability. Treatment of additional 1 % tax: In case of interstate supply of goods, additional 1% tax would also be levied for initial 2 years. However, it is proposed not to levy this tax where supply of goods is other than on account of sales. Hence, principal supplier would not be required to charge this additional tax on supply of goods to job worker. Similarly, the job worker needs not to charge this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bmission of forms: Under present law, the principal supplier and job worker is required to transfer the material on the basis of Annexure -II challan, delivery challan, forms under CST/VAT Act etc. All these requirements are expected to be done away under proposed GST regime. Though there could be some documentary evidence/format which may be prescribed to capture the transactions other than of supply. Booking of revenue in books of account: The distinction between supply and sale will continue in the post GST regime also. All supply may not be considered sales. As the transaction would not be on account of sale, it shall not be recorded as revenue in the books of principal supplier as well as job worker as revenue can be booked only when there is transfer of property in goods which is guided by Accounting Standards issued by ICAI. If all supplies are treated as revenue in the books of account, the revenue would be inflated in the books of both principal supplier as well as job worker

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =