2019 (3) TMI 704 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – WEST BENGAL – TMI – Levy of IGST – process of appointing CDI Virtual Films Inc.(CDIVF) as a Line Producer in Brazil – Reverse charge mechanism – rate of tax depending upon the classification of the service of a Line Producer – place of supply of services – Held that:- A Line Producer’s job is not limited to arranging hotel accommodation, catering for the filming crew, local transportation and procuring location permits on behalf of the principal. Although he may facilitate the provisioning of a few services where the Applicant reimburses him on an actual cost basis, the Line Producer, being a key member of the production team, supplies the main service on his own account. It involves arranging all logistics for actual shooting, estimating and budgeting the cost of shooting and other residual activities relating to shooting on location. He assists and collaborates with the filming crew of the Applicant in deciding on various issues rela
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
so that CDIVF acts as pure agent for certain services in addition to the main supply of motion picture production service, the related transactions will be import of services from the actual suppliers, and the amount paid on actual cost basis for procuring those services will be subjected to IGST at the applicable IGST rate on such services. – Case No. 44 of 2018 Order No. 45/WBAAR/2018-19 Dated:- 26-2-2019 – Mr Sydney D Silva, Joint Commissioner, CGST & CX (Member) and Mr Parthasarathi Dey, Senior Joint Commissioner, SGST (Member) Applicant s representative heard : Rahul Dhanuka, Advocate Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called the GST Act ), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ns raised are admissible for an advance ruling under section 97(2)(a), (b) & (e) of the GST Act, read with section 20(xviii) of the IGST Act, 2017. 1.3 The Applicant declares that the issues raised in the application are not pending nor decided in any proceedings under any provisions of the GST Act. The officer concerned from the revenue has raised no objection to the admissibility of the Application. 1.4 The Application is, therefore, admitted. 2. Submissions of the Applicant 2.1 The Applicant submits, along with the Application, a written submission, including a description of the activity of a Line Producer and the proposed draft for the contract with CDIVF (hereinafter the Contract). The Contract is for the production services . According to clause 5 of the Contract, CDIVF will facilitate the provisioning of the production services. The Applicant will reimburse CDIVF the cost of procuring these services, based on the bills raised by the service providers, bearing the name of th
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
licant knows in advance the amount that the foreign supplier shall charge in as much as the budgeted amount is shared by CDIVF in advance. In case of any deviation from the budgeted amount, CDIVF shall pay the foreign supplier after taking concurrence from the Applicant. Moreover, the invoices raised by the foreign suppliers mention the name of the motion picture. 2.4 Without prejudice to the aforesaid, the Applicant further argues that the service of CDIVF can also be classified as event management service, as described under section 13(5) of the IGST Act, 2017. The shooting of the film in foreign locations, resulting in the emergence of a CD containing the filmed materials, is an event that CDIVF is going to organize and manage. 2.5 At the same time, the Applicant argues that CDIVF will act as pure agent, as defined under rule 33. The Contract specifically provides that the Applicant will reimburse CDIVF at the actual cost of procuring these services, based on the bills the service p
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
d 28/06/2017. 2.8 Moreover, the Applicant argues that the place of supply being the location of the supplier, the recipient receives the service in Brazil and location of the recipient is, therefore, not within the taxable territory, and no tax is payable on RCM in terms of Sl No. 1 of Notification No. 10/2017 – IGST (Rate) dated 28/06/2017. 3. Submissions of the Revenue 3.1 Concerned officer from the Revenue submits that at the time of signing the Contract the so-called principal suppliers of the services or the services are not clearly identified. The Question of facilitating as an intermediary between the principal suppliers and the recipient, therefore, does not arise. CDIVF is, not, therefore, acting as an intermediary. 4. Observation & Findings of the Authority 4.1. The answer to the question about the liability to pay IGST on the reverse charge on the payments to be made to CDIVF depends upon the location of the recipient of the service. The Applicant, a resident of India, w
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
estion of classification of the Line Producer s service is, therefore, to be answered first before determining whether the Applicant is liable to pay IGST on the payments to be made to CDIVF in terms of Sl No. 1 of Notification No. 10/2017 – IGST (Rate) dated 28/06/2017, provided the transaction constitutes an inter-State supply within the meaning of section 7(4) of the IGST Act, 2017. 4.3 SAC 999900 refers to services provided by embassies and representations from other countries, services provided by international organizations such as the United Nations and its specialized agencies or regional bodies, etc., the Organization of American States, the European Union, the African Union, the League of Arab States, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the World Customs Organization, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and other international bodies or extraterritorial units (refer to Explanatory Notes on Classification of Services; cbic.gov.in). Service
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
er needs to be discussed in this context. Event management services (SAC 998596), as described in section 13(5) of the IGST Act, refers to admission to, or organization of a cultural, artistic, sporting, educational or entertainment event, or a celebration, conference, fair, exhibition or similar events, and services ancillary to such admission or organization . Clearly, any event whatsoever does not fit the bill. It has to be an event of a nature specified above. The emergence of a CD containing footage for a motion picture is not a cultural, artistic, or entertainment or a similar event. It is merely a stage in the process of producing the feature film. Screening of the completed motion picture or, for that matter, of the footage contained in the CD, however, can fit the description of events included in section 13(5) of the IGST Act. CDIVF is not being contracted for organizing such a screening event for the Applicant. CDVIF is not, therefore, supplying services for organizing event
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ice providers mentioned in the petition are Line Producers. Neither has the Tribunal examined whether these commercial services are intermediary in nature. This judgment does not, therefore, throw much light on the question of classifying the service of a Line Producer and, therefore, not applicable in the present case. 4.7 It is evident from the above discussion that the Contract, the Applicant s argument based on the Contract, or the judgment in the case of Yash Raj Film (supra) does not throw sufficient light on the role CDIVF plays as a Line Producer in the production of the film in offshore locations. He is alternately described as an intermediary service provider or an event manager. It is, therefore, pertinent to examine the role of the Line Producer, as understood in common parlance in the film industry. 4.8 A Line Producer is a key member of the production team for a motion picture. Typically, a Line Producer manages the budget of a motion picture. Alternatively, or in additio
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
hoot that shows how long it will take to shoot each scene. From this schedule, the Line Producer can accurately estimate the cost of each day's shooting and produce a provisional budget estimating the total amount of funding required. 4.9 During pre-production, Line Producers, working closely with the director, production manager, first assistant director, art director and other heads of department, prepare the production schedule and budget and set the shoot date. Line Producers oversee all other preproduction activities, including hiring the production team, setting up the production office, location scouting, ensuring compliance with regulations and codes of practice, sourcing equipment and suppliers, selecting the crew, engaging supporting artists and contributors, and monitoring the progress of the art department and other production departments. Line Producers are ultimately responsible for overseeing all activities, and for ensuring that the production is completed on time a
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ring during the shooting. His service is, therefore, an integral part of the activity for the production of the feature film. 4.11 The Applicant himself submits that CDIVF is going to organize and manage the shooting in Brazil that will result in the emergence of a CD containing the audio-visual content, and retains as security all production rights and talent buy-outs for such production in Brazil till receiving the final payment from the recipient. Clearly, CDVIF cannot retain production rights and talent buy-outs, even as security, unless it is engaged in the production and realization of a motion picture, explicitly or implicitly protected by copyright, without a contract for outright sale. It is, therefore, provisioning motion picture production service classifiable under SAC 999612. It is, therefore, not an intermediary service. 4.12 The service being supplied is not, therefore, classifiable as the one specified in subsections (3) to (13) of section 13 of the IGST Act, 2017. The
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
or services or both; (b) neither intends to hold nor holds any title to the goods or services or both so procured or supplied as a pure agent of the recipient of supply; (c) does not use for his own interest such goods or services so procured; and (d) receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services in addition to the amount received for supply he provides on his own account. The Contract does not specify CDIVF as the Applicant s pure agent. It merely refers to bills for some of the services procured will bear the name of the feature film and will be paid on an actual cost basis. The crucial test is whether these services are a charge on the Applicant or CDIVF. If CDIVF is liable to pay the suppliers of these services no matter what the Applicant does, it will be treated as a charge on CDIVF. As CDIVF holds the production rights, even though as security, all procurements of goods and services will be a charge on him unless specifically excluded. That the bill
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
terms of Sl No. 1 of Notification No. 10/2017 – IGST (Rate) dated 28/06/2017at 18% rate specified under Sl No. 34(vi) of Notification No. 08/2017 – IT (Rate) dated 28/06/2017, as amended from time to time. No deduction is available in terms of the contract with the Line Producer appended to the Application from the value of the supply of motion picture production service even if payment is made on an actual cost basis. However, if the Applicant modifies the contract so that the Line Producer acts as pure agent for certain services in addition to the main supply of motion picture production service, the related transactions will be import of services from the actual suppliers, and the amount paid on actual cost basis for procuring those services will be subjected to IGST at the applicable IGST rate on such services. This Ruling is valid subject to the provisions under Section 103 until and unless declared void under Section 104(1) of the GST Act. – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements –
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =