2019 (3) TMI 540 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI – Input tax credit – procurement of Gold coins which are to be distributed to the customers at the end of scheme period for achieving the stipulated lifting or payment criteria – various other schemes involved periodically – gift or not – Held that:- The provisions of ITC are governed by Sections 16 and 17 of the CGST Act, 2017. In order to avail ITC, two basic provisions need to be complied with, i.e. Section 16 and Section 17. As per Section 16, a taxpayer is entitled to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services to him which are used in the course or furtherance of his business, i.e this section disallows ITC against input goods/services used for non-business purposes. Section 17 (5) of the CGST Act deals with Blocked credits and begins with a non obstante clause, which means even if Section 16 (1) allows ITC, Section 17(5) shall block in respect of certain cases.
–
The word ‘gift’ has n
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
t has assigned a value to the gold coins to be given gifts and the value is ₹ 3,200/- per gm. They have not explained as to how they have arrived at the value because value of gold changes everyday. Secondly the Scheme announced by them states that “customers who lifted the products as per the scheme and made payments as per the scheme are invited for the meeting.
–
ITC on “gifts” will not be available when no GST is being paid on their disposal. Just because the applicant submits that they have satisfied Section 16 (1) of the CGST Act 2017 does not mean that they are entitled to credit since Section 17(5) starts with “Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of Section 16” The implication is that in the subject case even if it seems, as per the applicant, that Section 16 (1) is applicable in their case and allows them credit, Section 17(5) shall block such credits. – GST-ARA- 72/2018-19/B-165 Dated:- 20-12-2018 – SHRI B. TIMOTHY, AND SHRI B. V. BORHADE, MEMBER
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST Act / MGST Act would be mentioned as being under the GST Act . FACTS AND CONTENTION – AS PER THE APPLICANT The submissions, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus- STATEMENT OF THE RELEVANT FACTS HAVING A BEARING ON THE QUESTION(S) ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS SOUGHT 1. This Application is being filed by M/s. Biostadt India Limited ( the Applicant /the Company ). The Applicant, having Good and Service Tax (GST) Registration No. 27AACCB1830G123 is inter alia engaged in the business of developing, manufacturing and distributing crop protection chemicals and hybrid seeds
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
has constantly helped the company in achieving their long-term vision and mission. 6. It is a well proven fact that the channel of distribution plays a pivotal role in achieving the marketing objectives of the company. In order to achieve sales and marketing objectives, the applicant has launched various target based – sales incentive schemes for their distributors and retailers (customers). These schemes help the customers to be motivated to achieve a specified target and in turn helps the company to achieve their targets. 7. The applicant has PAN-India presence and has operations spread out in more than 15 states. The Applicant was erstwhile registered under Central Excise law, Service tax legislation and respective State Value Added Tax laws and now is registered under Good and Service Tax (GST). 8. This Application is being filed by M/s. Biostadt India Limited which inter-alia has launched a new sales promotion scheme namely the Kharif Gold Scheme 2018 for their customers. The said
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
d. Stock returns are not allowed under the said scheme. e. No other discounts are eligible under the said scheme. f. Both the legs of the scheme are independent of each other. Customer satisfying any one leg will be entitled to reward of that leg only. g. A meeting will be called at the end of the scheme period and customers who have satisfied either of the lifting or collection criteria shall be entitled to attend such meeting. h. During the meeting the customer shall be rewarded with the 8gms or 10 gms gold coin depending upon the criteria fulfilled by him. 10. The above mentioned scheme is in force. The applicant will be procuring gold coins from jewelers which are to be distributed at the end of the scheme. As per notification 1/2018 – CGST (Rate) dtd. 28.06.2017, gold is leviable to GST at the rate of 3 percent. 11. The applicant intends to maximize their sales and minimize their outstanding collection through the operation of Kharif Gold Scheme 2018 . Statement of relevant facts
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
led to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business. 2.2. Section 16(1) is an empowering section which creates a vested right upon the registered person to claim credit of input tax on goods or services or both procured by him provided they are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business. 2.3. Following are the important limbs to the qualifying section 16(1): • Registered Person: Section 2(94) of the CGST Act states that registered person means a person registered under Section 25 of the CGST Act. As stated earlier, the applicant is registered under the GST law. Input Tax: Input tax as defined under section 2(62) of the CGST Act includes CGST, respective SGST and UTGST, IGST and so on. Section 2(63) of the CGST Act defines Input tax credit as the credit of input tax. Inputs is defined under Section 2(59) of the CGST Act to mean any goods other
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
herance of business. The applicant has launched Kharif Gold scheme with an intention to maximize the sales and collections of the company. The scheme so implemented grants an advantage to the applicant over other competitors in the market. These schemes ensure brand loyalty and market loyalty which are the important aspects of any business. Hence it would be reasonable to conclude that the scheme launched by the applicant is in course or further of applicant s business . 2.4. Section 16(2) of the CGST Act provides for conditions which need to be satisfied for claiming ITC on supply of goods or services or both. These conditions are with respect to possession of tax invoice, receipt of goods, payment of tax and filing of returns. The applicant contends that he has satisfied the conditions as laid down in Section 16(2) and is eligible to claim ITC on purchase of gold coins. 2.5. In accordance with the above paras, applicant strongly feels that he is eligible to claim ITC on procurement o
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
………….. (f) ………………………….. (g) ………………………….. (h) goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples; and 2.8 On a plain reading of aforesaid provisions, one may reasonably conclude that ITC needs to be reversed in respect of gold coins which are disposed of by way of gifts or free samples. However it is imperative to understand the ambit of term gifts . 2.9. The term gift is not defined under CGST Act. Hence reference needs to be made to other statutes or jurisprudence available on the same. The Gift-Tax Act (18 of 1858) had defined the word gift to mean transfer by one person to another of any existing movable or immovable property voluntarily and without consideration in money or money s worth. The Honorable Supreme Court cited the definition of gift from Corpus Juris Secundum, Volume 38 in the case of Sonia Bhatia v. State of UP [1981 SCR (3) 239,1981 SCC (2) 585) = 1981 (3) TMI 250 – SUPREME COURT as
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
hese sales linked scheme are purely for advancement of company s business. It is a known principle that nothing comes free in business . Each and every act done for business comes with a consideration. Applying same analogy, gold coins are not given away freely to the customers. The applicant has a contractual arrangement with the customer wherein if he purchases certain amount of company s product or makes payment in a prescribed manner then he shall be entitled to a gold coin of specific weight. Gold coin will not be available to the customer unless he satisfies the criteria laid under the scheme. Giving away gold coins to customer cannot be termed as voluntary act of the applicant. 2.12. The applicant strongly contends that the gold coins distributed to customers at the end of scheme period cannot be qualified as gift . Since they cannot be qualified as gift, disallowance under Section 17(5) will not be attracted. Hence, the applicant should be entitled to claim ITC of gold coins pu
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
vited for meeting. Prices of the products vary for different SKUS No Stock Returns under the scheme. In case of any discrepancy company reserves the right to modify/cancel the scheme without prior notice THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT (CGST), 2017 Relevant provisions under CGST Act, 2017: 1. Inputs [Section 2(59)1: Input means any goods other than capital goods used or intended to be used by a supplier in the course or furtherance of business. 2. Input Tax [Section 2(62)1: Input tax in relation to a registered person, means the central tax, State tax, integrated tax or Union territory tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both made to him and includes (a) the integrated goods and services tax charged on import of goods; (b) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9; (c) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 5 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act; (d) the tax payable under the provisions
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
such person. 6. Conditions for taking input tax credit (Section 16(2): (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, no registered person shall be entitled to the credit of any input tax in respect of any supply of goods or services or both to him unless, (a) he is in possession of a tax invoice or debit note issued by a supplier registered under this Act, or such other tax paying documents as may be prescribed; (b) he has received the goods or services or both. Explanation. For the purposes of this clause, it shall be deemed that the registered person has received the goods where the goods are delivered by the supplier to a recipient or any other person on the direction of such registered person, whether acting as an agent or otherwise, before or during movement of goods, either by way of transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise; (c) subject to the provisions of section 41, the tax charged in respect of such supply has been actually paid to the Government, either
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply; (ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre; (iii) rent-a-cab, life insurance and health insurance except where- (A) the Government notifies the services which are obligatory for an employer to provide to its employees under any law for the time being in force; or (B) such inward supply of goods or services or both of a particular category is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as part of a taxable composite or mixed supply; and (iv) travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as leave or home travel concession; (C) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service; (d) goods or services or both received by a taxable person for cons
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
tural support that are used for making outward supply of goods or services or both and includes such foundation and structural supports but excludes – i. laud, building or any other civil structures; ii. telecommunication towers; and iii. pipelines laid outside the factory premises. THE GIFT TAX ACT, 1958 Relevant provisions under the Gift Tax Act, 1958: 1. Gift (Section 2(xii): Gift means the transfer by one person to another of any existing movable or immovable property made voluntarily and without consideration in money or money s worth, and includes the transfer or conversion of any property referred to in section 4, deemed to be a gift under that section; [Explanation.-A transfer of any building or part thereof referred to in clause (iii), clause (iiia) or clause (iiib) of section 27 of the Income tax Act, by the person who is deemed under the said clause to be the owner thereof made voluntarily and without consideration in money or money s worth, shall be deemed to be a gift made
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
t given away as gift: A Section 17(5) of the CGST Act provides for blocked credits. As per section 17(5)(h) registered person is not entitled to claim ITC of tax paid Re g n goods given away as gift or free sample. Erstwhile Gift Tax Act defined gift to mean transfer by one person to another of any existing movable or immovable property voluntarily and without consideration in money or money s worth. Honorable Supreme Court cited the definition of gift in the case of Sonia Bhatia v. State of UP [1981 SCR (3) 239, 1981 SCC (2) 585] = 1981 (3) TMI 250 – SUPREME COURT as a voluntary transfer of property by one to another, without any consideration or compensation therefor. A gift is a gratuity and an act of generosity and does not require a consideration, but there can be none; if there is a consideration for the transaction, it is not a gift. It is a settled principle that Gift cannot arise out of a contractual obligation and nothing comes free in business . The Australian High Cou
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
e. > Value of Gold coins is not to be included in the value of goods: Section 15(1) of CGST Act provides that value of supply of goods shall be the transaction value i.e. price actually paid or payable for said supply of goods where the supplier and recipient of supply are not related and price is the sole consideration for the supply. Related persons is defined in explanation to section 15 of CGST AGNES Our customers do not fall under any of the said criteria of related person Price of all the products are pre-defined and customers are obliged to pay that price for purchase of products. Price is the sole consideration received from the customers for sales made by us. Section 15(1) criteria is satisfied in our case and hence value of supply of goods should include only the price that is payable by the customer. Value of gold coins cannot be clubbed with value of supply made by us. Moreover, cost of gold coin to be distributed at the end of scheme is factored in sales price ch
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ruling on allowability of Input Tax Credit and not the valuation. We hereby fervently pray your good office to take cognizance of the above referred submissions and submissions dated 29.08.2018 & 10.09.2018 and accord much awaited justice to law abiding tax payer. 03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus- It is submitted that, Issue on which advance ruling is required: Reference Application No:72 Dated 23.08.2018 I. Comments on Annexure-1 of Submission 1. Annexure I contains Statement of Relevant Facts Having a Bearing on the Questions on which the Advance Ruling is sought. This office offers no comments. II. Comments on Annexure-II of Submission 1. Annexure II contains Issues for Determination . This office offers no comments. III. Comments on Annexure-Ill of Submission Para 2.1: No comments, Para 2.2: No comments. Para 2.3 & Para 2.4 : 1. This office contends that the Gold coins to be distributed to customers of
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
has not been dealt with in any manner under the GST law. Hence, there is no definite yardstick to find out whether some activity is being carried out in the course or furtherance of a business or not. Each case would need to be examined, based on its facts, on the touchstone of the definition of inputs . 5. In the course or furtherance is not defined, but is broad enough to cover any supplies made in connection with the business. It is important to note that only supplies received by a taxable person that are used/ consumed in the course or furtherance of business are eligible for claiming input tax credit. This impacts the eligibility to claim input tax: credit. Hence, it becomes important for an entity to justify that a particular act is done in the course and furtherance of its business goals and intentions. 6. We can determine whether a activity is undertaken in the course or furtherance of business on the basis of few principles: a. Was the activity undertaken in line with the ba
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
stribution of gold coins is not in line with the basic business model. b. The gold coins are not essential for continuity in supply. c. The distribution of gold coins are not concerned with the making of taxable supply for consideration unless we look as this distribution as a hidden discount . 9. The conditions, laid down in Section 16(2) of the Act have been satisfied but not the basic requirement as per Section 16(1) of the Act. Hence, the contention of the Applicant is not acceptable. Para 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 and 2.12: 1. Clause (b) of Section 17(5) of CGST Act 2017 stipulates that the input tax credit with respect to the goods disposed of by way of gift shall not be allowed. Or in other words, it is stipulated that no ITC on any goods can be availed, if they are given as gifts, whether or not in course of furtherance business. 2. ITC on goods given away or disposed as gifts should not be available when no tax is being paid on their disposal. The logic of satisfying
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ditions fulfilled ITC is not eligible and once eligible if not hit by 17(5), only then ITC can be availed. 3. The basic intention behind Section 17(5)(h) seems to be that it tries to restrict people from giving benefits or exchange consideration in kind (in lieu of cash) in the garb of gifts to avoid valuation and thus avoid levy of tax, In the instant case, the Gold Coins are gifts/ free supplies in course of business. If consideration for these goods is not charged directly; they shall qualify as gifts and ITC shall not be eligible. 4. If these gold coins are not treated as gifts, another argument can be considered then as discount / hidden discount and the said discount satisfies the conditions under Section 15(3), i.e. the discount (whether in full or in part) arises and is recorded as a contractual obligation under specific invoice(s), TC shall be available on such goods. It may be worthwhile to show such goods under the respective invoice/credit note after establishing on record,
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
applicable. 7. The applicant quoted Apex Court s judgment in the case of Sonia Bhatia Vs. State of UP [ 1981 (SCR (3) 239, 1981 .SCC (2) 598] = 1981 (3) TMI 250 – SUPREME COURT and contended that it is applicable to their case. The facts of the case were totally different and also the said judgment was delivered under a different legislation and therefore, the same cannot be made applicable to the facts of this case which is being adjudicated under GST ACT. In the case of KONE ELEVATOR INDIA PVT LTD VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU as reported in (2014(304) ELT 161. (SC) = 2014 (5) TMI 265 – SUPREME COURT it has been held that, it should be strict and literal, what is applicable in one taxing statute may not be applied to another taxing statute (Per: F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla.] (Para-84). Hence, the case law. cited by the applicant in this respect is not acceptable. 8. In case the Advance Ruling Authority accepts the contention of the applicant and allows the availment of ITC on gold coins, then
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
agar, manager appeared made oral and written submissions. The Jurisdictional Officer Sh. Vivek Anand Assistant Commissioner, Division-VIII, CGST & C. Ex., Mumbai Central GST Commissionerate appeared made written submissions. 05. OBSERVATIONS We have gone through the facts of the case. The issue put before us is in respect of a future transaction which would be on the lines thus – The applicant is engaged in the business of developing, manufacturing and distributing crop protection chemicals and hybrid seeds and in order to achieve sales and marketing objectives, they have launched various target based – sales incentive schemes for their distributors and retailers (customers) to achieve a specified target and in turn helps the company to achieve their targets. The subject application is in respect of a sales promotion scheme known as Kharif Gold Scheme 2018 , which has been floated by them for their customers and is of two types. In the first case, their Customers who purchased cert
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
the purpose of Section 16(1) read with Section 2(62) of the CGST Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). It has been submitted that the gold coins are not inputs because the said Distribution of gold coins is not in line with the basic business model, the gold coins are not essential for continuity in supply and the distribution of gold coins are not concerned with the making of taxable supply for consideration unless the distribution is looked as a hidden discount. We find that the applicant has floated the subject scheme for the period June, 2018 to August, 2018 only, by way of which gold coins of different denominations would be given to those customers who lifted a certain quantity of products or made a certain amount of payment. Thus it is seen that it is only those specific customers who fulfill the conditions would be able to avail the benefit of the subject scheme. The applicant has submitted that the said Gold coins are inputs for them and GST levied on such purchase q
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ect of goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples. We will therefore first discuss whether the gold coins in the subject case can be treated as a gift or not. The word gift has not been defined in the CGST Act and the Gift-Tax Act (18 of 1858) had defined the word gift to mean transfer by one person to another of any existing movable or immovable property voluntarily and without consideration in money or money s worth. It is seen from the definition that the transfer i.e the gift given in such a case has to be voluntary. The applicant has submitted that they have a contractual arrangement with the customer wherein if he purchases certain amount of company s product or makes payment in a prescribed manner then he shall be entitled to a gold coin of specific weight. A contractual arrangement implies especially in view of the magnitude and area of the applicant s business that, it should also be agreed by the customer in writing to such scheme
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
. Hence in the present context the word gift has an enlarged scope according to us and has its own colour. In all such cases, as in the present case, the statement that goods, in this case gold coins, will be given to customers who satisfy certain conditions is nothing but assurance of giving away gifts on those conditions being achieved by the customers. Under the GST laws the intention for non-granting/denial of setoff is envisaged in situations where there is no tax on output supply. In cases where the goods are procured with levy of input tax and are supplied without tax being paid on such output supplies, the scheme of the GST Act provides no input tax credit, except export. Schedule I to the CGST Act, 2017 deals with activities to be treated as supply even if made without consideration. As per Entry Number 2 to Schedule I (2), Supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between distinct persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or furtherance
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
avily on the customers in making purchase of particular quantities and above or in making payments of certain values and above. This act on behalf of the applicant if it is not excluded from the scope of being a supply, then the provisions of the Valuation Rules come into play. Thus in such cases it can safely be assumed that the purchase value and output supply value of the gift shall be the same and therefore the ITC would be the same as the output GST payable. In other words if the giverof the gift does not pay output tax on the same then the compensation to the department would be the foregoing of the ITC on such gifts. In the instant case it is seen that the applicant has assigned a value to the gold coins to be given gifts and the value is ₹ 3,200/- per gm. They have not explained as to how they have arrived at the value because value of gold changes everyday. Secondly the Scheme announced by them states that customers who lifted the products as per the scheme and made paym
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
p ITC on gifts will not be available when no GST is being paid on their disposal. Just because the applicant submits that they have satisfied Section 16 (1) of the CGST Act 2017 does not mean that they are entitled to credit since Section 17(5) starts with Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of Section 16 ……… The implication is that in the subject case even if it seems, as per the applicant, that Section 16 (1) is applicable in their case and allows them credit, Section 17(5) shall block such credits. In view of all above deliberations, the questions can be answered thus – 05. In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows : ORDER (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) NO.GST-ARA- 72/2018-19/B-165 Mumbai, dt. 20.12.2018 For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are answered thus – Question :- The question or issue befor
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =