M/s Chavan Autowheels Pvt. Ltd., M/s Chavan Motor Div. (I), Pvt. Ltd. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/s Chavan Autowheels Pvt. Ltd., M/s Chavan Motor Div. (I), Pvt. Ltd. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
GST
2019 (2) TMI 427 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – TMI
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 8-2-2019
WRIT PETITION NO. 713 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 716 OF 2019
GST
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
Mr. Chandrakant B. Thakar for the Petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly a/w Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for respondent Nos.3 to 6.
Ms. S.D. Vyas, 'B' Panel Counsel for State- Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 7.  
P.C. :
1 After this matter was heard for some time, firstly our attention was invited by Mr. Jetly appearing for respondent Nos.3 to 6 at page 41 of the memo of writ petition No.713 of 2019 and at page 47 of the memo of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.2018 issued by CBIC.
Accordingly, you may file your IT related grievance through field officer or nodal officer of your jurisdiction, for consideration of your grievance by IT-Grievance Redressal Committee.
Hence your letter dated 19.10.2018 is returned herewith, in original.
(Arjun Kumar Meena)
Deputy Commissioner to GST Council
Encl : As above.
3. Then, Mr. Jetly says that this is possibly not a grievance against the Central machinery, but the State GST Officials.
4. In that regard, we find that respondent No.2 to these petitions is the Commissioner of State Tax.
5. On an oral query, Ms. Shruti Vyas appearing for respondent Nos.1,2 and 7 took instructions from the official present in the Court and says that respondent Nos.1, 2 an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply