HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX KERALA GST TAX TOWER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, ASST. COMMISSIONER (INT) PALAKKAD, KERALA GST DEPARTMENT PALAKKAD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, PALAKKAD AND ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. 1 KERALA GST DEPARTMENT PALAKKAD
GST
2019 (2) TMI 329 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2019 (22) G. S. T. L. 323 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-2-2019
WA. No. 210 of 2019
GST
MR K. VINOD CHANDRAN AND MR ASHOK MENON, JJ.
For The Appellant : ADVS. SRI. RAJESH NAIR AND SRI. JOSEPH PRABAKAR
For The Respondents : SR GP SRI V. K. SHAMSUDHEEN
JUDGMENT
Vinod Chandran, J
Sri.Joseph Prabhakar, who appears for the appellant, would submit that the
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
isions of Section 130. We are afraid that the time for raising such a contention has not arisen, since as of now the Department has not proceeded under Section 130. We gave Sri.Joseph Prabhakar the choice to withdraw the Writ Petition and challenge the Section 130 proceedings, when it is taken up or to furnish Bank Guarantee. The learned Counsel would then submit that; let there be an interim order granting release of the goods on furnishing of Bank Guarantee and the larger issue could be considered in the Writ Appeal or the Writ Petition itself. However, we are afraid, such course would not be commendable especially when a Bank Guarantee is given, eventually on final orders being passed either the Bank Guarantee would be released or enforc
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =