HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX KERALA GST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (INT) PALAKKAD, KERALA GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, PALAKKAD AND ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. 1, KERALA GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD
GST
2019 (1) TMI 1152 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 16-1-2019
RP. No. 10 of 2019 IN WP(C). 41535/2018 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 41535/2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The PETITIONER : ADVS. SRI.RAJESH NAIR AND SRI.JOSEPH PRABAKAR
For The RESPONDENTS : GP DR. THUSHARA JAMES
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a dealer with registration in the State of Tamil Nadu, ha
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
er with its registration in Tamil Nadu. When it wanted to comply with the statutory demand and get the goods released, the respondent authorities insisted that the petitioner should have a temporary registration, remit the amounts using that registration, and then get the goods released. The petitioner is disinclined to follow that procedure. It wants to remit the amounts using its own Tamil Nadu registration and have the goods released. For this alternative, the Government Pleader cites practical difficulties as an answer.
3. Then, the Government pleader took instructions from the authorities, and informed the Court that the petitioner's representative can approach the authorities with a request to remit the amounts. They will gener
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =