2019 (1) TMI 679 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI – Detention of goods – Part-B of the E-Way bill was not updated – Held that:- The petitioner shall pay one time tax liability of ₹ 1,61,032.78 under the CGST Act and ₹ 1,61,032.78 under the SGST Act before the second respondent within a period of four days from today – On receipt of such payment, the detained goods shall be released forthwith. – W.P.No.52 of 2019 And W.M.P.No.54 of 2019 Dated:- 4-1-2019 – Mr. Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu For the Petitioner : Mr.R.Kumar for Mr.N.Murali For the Respondents : Mrs.Dhana Madhri Government Advocate (Tax) ORDER Mrs.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Advocate (Tax) takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, this main writ pet
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ed by the petitioner before this Court as against the impugned detention order, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that without prejudice to the contention of the petitioner, they will pay one time tax under the CGST Act and SGST Act for the purpose of releasing the goods and agitate the matter before appropriate authority by way of filing revision. 5. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents is not having any objection, if the petitioner is willing to pay one time tax liability. 6. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances and without expressing any view on the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner as well as the respondents in the impugned detention proceedings, this writ petition
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =