Rane Brake lining Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Puducherry
Central Excise
2019 (1) TMI 169 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 28-12-2018
Appeal No. E/42315-42317/2018 – FINAL ORDER No. 43189-43191/2018
Central Excise
Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Ms. S. Sridevi, Advocate For the Appellant
Shri L. Nandakumar, AC (AR) For the Respondent
ORDER
All the three appeals since relating to the same appellant and involving identical dispute, they are taken up for common disposal.
2. The common facts of these cases are that appellants, engaged in manufacture inter alia of Brake Lining, Disc Pads etc. had taken input service credit on outward transportation, car hiring, car
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
onsidered
SCN NO.LTUC/353/2010-DC DT 09.12.2010
SCN NO.LTUC/364/2011-DC DT 23.11.2011
Period of demand
Feb 2009 to Nov 2009
Dec 2009 to Nov 2010
Dec 2010 to March 2011
Details of credit availed
GTA-Rs.2,20,216
Car hiring- Rs. 3416/-
Canteen/ODC-Rs.1,21,216
GTA-Rs.1,59,770
Car hiring- Rs. 18,841/-
Canteen/ODC-Rs.1,69,248/-
GTA-Rs.53,506
Car hiring- Rs. 3165/-
Canteen/ODC-Rs.73,005
Order in Original No.
10/2018 dt.28.02.2018
12/2018 dt.28/02.2018
13/2018 dt.28.02.2018
Details of Credit allowed
GTA -Rs.2,20,216/-
GTA -Rs.1,59,770/-
GTA -Rs.53,506/-
Details of Credit denied in respect of car hiring and outdoor catering
Rs.3416/- + Rs. 1,21,307/-
Rs.18,841/- + Rs. 1,69,248/-
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
4. She submits that prior to 1.4.2011 the said definition did not have any restrictions or bar for availing input credits in respect of canteen service , car hire. She further submits that that a number of Tribunal decisions have consistently upheld the eligibility of such input credits prior to 1.4.2011, for example, in Scope International Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE Chennai – 2018 (7) TMI 1007 – CESTAT Chennai.
5. On the other hand, Ld. A.R Shri L.Nandakumar supports the impugned order.
6. Heard both sides and have gone through the facts. The only dispute in these appeals are pertaining to car repair and canteen services. I find that the Ld. Advocate is correct in her assertion that there was no restriction or bar in the definition of 'input serv
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =