2018 (12) TMI 1084 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI – Appearance for the examination for “GST Practitioner” – declaration of result – Held that:- Initially, the petitioner apprehended that he would not get a chance to write the examination, because his application was processed beyond the cut off date. Now as a matter of policy, the first respondent has condoned the lapse and is allowing all other persons to write the examination. The petitioner has, however, already gone through that process and his results have been kept in the sealed cover.
–
It serves the interest of justice if the authorities declare the petitioner's result, in stead of giving him another opportunity of writing the examination – petition allowed by way of remand. – WP (
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
t off date. So he pleaded that unless he was permitted to take examination on 31.10.2018, he would suffer irreparable loss and hardship-affecting his career. 3. This Court, through an interim order dated 9th October 2018, permitted the petitioner to write the examination. He did write. And his result was put in the sealed cover. 4. Later, to rescue other applicants who registered themselves beyond the cut off date, the first respondent decided to conduct another examination on 17th December 2018. In other words, even if the petitioner had not filed this writ petition and had not got the interim direction to write the exam, he would have had the second opportunity: examination on 17th December 2018. 5. I reckon this second opportunity obviat
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =