2018 (11) TMI 836 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI – Rectification of mistake – It is the case of Revenue that the appeal numbers mentioned in the final order should be “ST/257/2007 and ST/258/2007” instead of ST/447 & 448/2007 – Held that:- There is no error in mentioning the appeal numbers in the final order dated 21.06.2017 of the Tribunal.
–
Yet, another error brought to the notice of the Bench is that in the Final Order No. A/30852-30853/2017, dated 21.06.2017 of the Tribunal, it did not mention the Order-in-Original No. 12/2007(ST), dated 24.08.2007 passed by CCE, Trichy. We do find that this is a typographical error and accordingly, the above said Order-in-Original is to be included on the first page of the Final Order dated 21.06.2007
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
appeal adjudicating authority was Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy). Against such an order, assessee preferred a appeal before the Bench of the Tribunal in Chennai. Subsequently, they made a miscellaneous application for transferring of these appeals to Bangalore Bench. The said miscellaneous application was disposed of by Miscellaneous Order No. 41916/2014, dated 10.11.2014 and Asst. Registrar, CESTAT, Chennai, was directed to place the appeals before Hon'ble President for passing necessary order. CESTAT, New Delhi by a letter dated 02.12.2014 communicated that these two appeals of Kei Rsos Maritime Limited (Appeal Nos. ST/257, 258/2007) stands transferred to Bangalore Bench. When these appeals were received at Bangalore Bench, t
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =