Sidhi Vinayak Agencies And Another Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others

2018 (11) TMI 710 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – TMI – Seizure of goods – goods have been seized on account of the fact that a proper E-way bill was not accompanying the goods – In view of the circular dated 16th August 2017, no proceeding for seizure ought to have been undertaken – Revenue submits that the above circular would not be applicable in view of the amendment in Rule 138 of the Rules with effect from 1.4.2018.

The matter requires consideration. Sri Tripathi may file counter affidavit within three weeks. – Writ Tax No. – 1449 of 2018 Dated:- 14-11-2018 – Pankaj Mithal And Ashok Kumar JJ. For the Petitioner : Shubham Agrawal For the Respondent : C.S.C. ORDER Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply