2018 (11) TMI 33 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI – Classification of services – loading, transport and unloading of coal from mining – whether classified under Goods Transport Agency Services or under the head Cargo Handling Services? – reverse charge mechanism – Held that:- In terms of 65A (2)(b), that the classification in the case of combined service is to be decided by analyzing the fact as to which service gives essential character to the service being performed – As can be seen from the contract that the essential character of the service for which contract has been entered by the service provider is that the service received are for transportation of coal for mining area to the railway siding and the activity of loading/ unloading mechanically or otherwise is only incidental to the activity of transportation of the cargo in these cases – the service provided by the appellants have rightly been classified in the Goods Transportation Agency service.
–
Tis issue has already been exam
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
w Cause Notice dated 27.09.2010 for the period April 2009 to March 2010 and Show Cause Notice dated 04.10.2011 for the period April, 2010 to March 2011 were issued on the ground that the appellants were doing loading, transport and unloading of coal from mining under the category of Cargo Handling Services . Appeal No. Period involved Amount involved in OIA 1 2 3 Service Tax Appeal No.52638 of 2015 Jan, 2009 to March, 2009 Rs.10,37,093/- Service Tax Appeal No.52639 of 2015 April, 2010 to March, 2011 Rs.7,06,995/- 2. The basic issue before us for adjudication is that whether the department is correct in holding that the service provided by the above mentioned appellants falls under the category of cargo handling services as defined under section 65 (105) (zr) read with section 105 (23) of the Finance Act, 1994 or whether the service tax is correctly been paid by recipient of the service under Goods Transportation Agency service on reverse charge basis. In this regard, it will be appropr
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
sed on ruling price of diesel as on 1.03.2010 i.e. ₹ 39.87 per litre. Escalation if applicable will be paid as per clause No. 37 of Special Terms and Conditions of Tender document for price variation clause. 3. It can be seen from the above mentioned terms of the contract that rates which have been provided to the appellant is based on the distance for which transportation of the coal is to be undertaken by the service provider i.e. the appellant in these cases. The relevant prices as mentioned above is also subject to escalation of the transportation rates as per changes in the fuel price for the relevant period. This basically signifies that the rates are pre-dominantly for transportation of cargo rather than for handing of cargo. However, before proceeding further the relevant section 65 A of Finance Act, 1994 need to be looked into in detail for classification of the service rendered by the appellant. The provisions of section 65A provides as follows:- SECTION 65A. Classifica
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
be seen from a plain reading of 65A (2)(b) that the classification in the case of combined service is to be decided by analyzing the fact as to which service gives essential character to the service being performed. As can be seen from the above contract that the essential character of the service for which contract has been entered by the service provider is that the service received are for transportation of coal for mining area to the railway siding and the activity of loading/ unloading mechanically or otherwise is in our view, is only incidental to the activity of transportation of the cargo in these cases. 5. In view of the above, we hold that the service provided by the appellants have rightly been classified in the Goods Transportation Agency service. 6. We also feel that this issue has already been examined by the Hon ble Supreme Court in their decision in the case of CCE & ST Raipur Vs Singh Transporters [(2017 (4) GSTL 3 (SC)] wherein the Hon ble Supreme Court has held t
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =