M/s. EAP Infrastructures Private Limited Represented by its Director Versus The Principal Chief Commissioner Good and Services Tax Act (Previously Central Excise and Customs), ChennaiThe State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary, Chennai, The Union of India Represented by its Secretary, New Delhi And The Chairman GSTIN, New Delhi –
GST
2018 (10) TMI 253 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 4-9-2018
W. P. No. 22941 of 2018
GST
MR K. RAVICHANDRABAABU, J.
For The Petitioner : Mr. C. Sivasubramanian
For The Respondents : Mr. V. Sundareswaran Senior Panel Counsel, Mr. M. Hariharan, Additional Government Pleader (T)
ORDER
Mr. V. Sundareswaran, learned Senior Panel Counsel takes notice for the
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
d similar grievance expressed by the similarly situated persons and disposed of those writ petitions on 21. 08. 2018 in W. P. Nos. 21321 to 21323 of 2018, by issuing certain directions.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that similar directions may be issued in the petitioner's case as well.
6. Mr. V. Sundareswaran, the learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents 1, 3 & 4 though submitted that similar directions may be issued in this case as well, he requested this Court to make it clear that the petitioner is entitled to the benefits by way of directions issued by this Court, only when they have made genuine attempt in uploading the FORM GST TRANS 1.
7. Needless to say that it is for the petitioner to
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =