AN ANALYSIS OF ADVANCE RULING IN THE CASE OF M/S COLUMBIA ASIA HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED
By: – Prasanna Kumar
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 28-9-2018
AN ANALYSIS OF ADVANCE RULING IN THE CASE OF
M/S COLUMBIA ASIA HOSPITALS PVT LTD
ADVANCE RULING NO. KAR.ADRG 15/2018
With due respect to the authorities for advance ruling in Karnataka, I have made an attempt to analyze the Advance Ruling given in the case of M/S COLUMBIA ASIS HOSPITALS PVT LTD.[ 2018 (8) TMI 876 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA ] This attempt is not to disrespect the authorities. This attempt is purely an academic one. The readers are required not to take this analysis as an opinion on legality.
Columbia Hospitals Pvt Limited
As per the contents of the Advance Ruling, M/S Columbia Hospitals Pvt Ltd is a private limited company and is an International Healthcare group operating a chain of modern hospitals across Asia. The Company is currently operating across six different states hav
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
pplies. An example of how the company is distributing the common expenses is also quoted by the company in its application.
Issues for Advance Ruling
As per Para 3 of the Advance Ruling, The question on which advance ruling is sought is as follows;
” whether the activities performed by the employees at the corporate office in the course of or in relation to employment such as accounting, other administrative and IT system maintenance for the units located in other states as well i.e distinct persons as per Section 25(4) of the Central Goods and Services Act 2017(CGST ACT) shall be treated as supply as per Entry 2 of Schedule I of the CGST Act or it shall not be treated as supply of services as per Entry 1 of Schedule III of the CGST Act”
Also, as per Para 7 of the Advance Ruling, the Company has also asked,
“whether the allocation of expenses to registered units located in other states, by IMO tantamount to supply of service between related or distinct persons as per Entry 2 of S
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
business of the Company is to provide secondary and tertiary healthcare services in India.
In Para 8.1 under “Findings & Discussion” to ascertain the applicability of Entry No.2 of Schedule I to the activities of the accounts and management done by the IMO (India Management Office) for the individual units located both within the state and also outside the state, the authorities have relied upon Entry 2 of Schedule I, which deals with the activities that are to be treated as supplies even if made without consideration, which reads as under;
“2. Supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between related persons or between distinct persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or furtherance of business”
The contention of the authorities is that the transactions between employer and employee are taxable even though there is no consideration flowing between them since covered by Explanation to Section 15 of the CGST Act.
The reference to clause (c)
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ot there is volume, frequency, continuity or regularity of such transaction;
(d) supply or acquisition of goods including capital goods and services in connection with commencement or closure of business;
(e) provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members;
(f) admission, for a consideration, of persons to any premises;
(g) services supplied by a person as the holder of an office which has been accepted by him in the course or furtherance of trade, profession or vocation;
(h) services provided by a race club by way of totalisator or a license to book maker in such club; and
(i) any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities;
Discussion Paper by Expert Committee
But unfortunately, the phrase “in the course or furtherance of business has not been defined under Se
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
titutes a business or not is determined by considering the whole of the activities carried on by him. If these activities are predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies to customers for a consideration, it has to be held that the taxable person is in the “business” of making taxable supplies, and that the taxable supplies which he makes are supplies made in the course of carrying on that business, especially if those supplies are made commercially by those who seek to profit from them. In the UK, there is generally a 6 – point test to determine whether an activity is in the course of business, which has emerged through various judicial decisions. The Paper explained that the same 6-point tests could serve as a set of tools to compare an activity with features of activities that were clearly in the nature of business. The 6-point tests are as follows;
* Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?
* Is the activity an occupation or function which is acti
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
the course of or in furtherance of its business since its business is to provide secondary and tertiary healthcare services only.
* Entry 2 of Schedule I states, “Supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between related persons or between distinct persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or furtherance of business”. As long as the supply is not in the course of or in furtherance of business, it is not liable to GST though it is between distinct persons.
* Only transactions which are in the nature of business and have been carried on in the course of or furtherance of business, whether with or without consideration, are subject to GST and not otherwise. Of course subject to other provisions of the GST law.
* For sharing of expenses amongst branches, divisions, of a single entity, there is no need to apply GST since they don't tantamount to supply in the course of or furtherance of business in view of the explanation given herein above on s
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =