Shyam Mani Umesh Nigam Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Mumbai South

2018 (9) TMI 1065 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI – Penalty under Section 78A of the Finance Act, 1994 on employees of the company – case of appellant is that since Section 78A ibid was brought into the statute book on 10th May 2013, penalty cannot be imposed on the employees of the company by invoking the non-existent provisions of Section 78A at the material time.

Held that:- During the disputed period, Section 78A ibid was not incorporated in the statute and the same was inserted by Finance Act, 2013 with effect from 10th May 2013 – the provisions of Section 78A ibid cannot be invoked for imposition of penalty on the employees for the offence committed by the company – Appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – ST/86363 & 86364/2018

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by the Finance Act, 2013, with effect from 10th May 2013. Accordingly, the appellants submit that since Section 78A ibid was brought into the statute book on 10th May 2013, penalty cannot be imposed on the employees of the company by invoking the non-existent provisions of Section 78A at the material time. 4. I find force in the submissions of the appellants that during the disputed period, Section 78A ibid was not incorporated in the statute and the same was inserted by Finance Act, 2013 with effect from 10th May 2013. Thus, I am of the view that the provisions of Section 78A ibid cannot be invoked for imposition of penalty on the employees for the offence committed by the company. I find that in identical set of facts, this Tribunal in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply