SARE REALTY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, DOTCOM HOME FASHIONS PVT LTD., TARA CHAND SALUJA & SONS, VEE GEE AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD., ANKUR OIL & REFRIGERATION, M/s TARA CHAND SALUJA & COMPANY, M/s ALLIANCE GRAPHIC EQUIPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, M/s BATRA ART PRESS, BENLON INDIA LTD., FRV POWER INDIA PVT. LTD., AMAN MOTORS Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
GST
2018 (9) TMI 373 – DELHI HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 177 (Del.)
DELHI HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 1-8-2018
W. P. (C) 1300/2018, W. P. (C) 1701/2018 & CM No. 7010/2018, W. P. (C) 2192/2018 & CM No. 9058/2018, W. P. (C) 2332/2018, W. P. (C) 2333/2018 & CM No. 9801/2018, W. P. (C) 2475/2018 & CM No. 10262/2018, W. P. (C) 2740/2018 & CM No. 11123/2018, W. P. (C) 2885/2018
GST
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
Standing Counsel, Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for Revenue, Mr. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Mr. Umang Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for Revenue., Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for Revenue. , Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for Revenue, Mr. Kriti Sinha, Advocate for Mr. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate for CBEC., Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for Revenue., Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for Revenue., Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Govt. Pleader for UOI., Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Amit Bansal, Mr. Akhil Kulshrestha, Advocates , Mr. Ashim Sood,
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
. It is submitted that the case of the present petitioners is also being considered as per the grievance redressal mechanism. Lastly, it is submitted that wherever any claim or representation is rejected, a speaking order giving the reasons would be passed and communicated to the concerned petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that they have already made a representation to the respondent authorities under the grievance mechanism and would pursue the said remedy. However, in case they are aggrieved by the final determination, they should be given liberty to challenge the order. The petitioners also reserve their right to challenge the constitutional vires if required and necessary. Recording the aforesaid, the writ petitions
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =