2018 (9) TMI 369 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 45 (All) – Seizure of goods alongwith Vehicle – till date no order passed inspite of appeal – Held that:- Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents is not in a position to inform why the appeal could not be decided and where the seized goods are kept by the authorities till they are ordered to be released by the competent authority or court. The respondents cannot be keep on detaining or seizing the goods and to keep them on the road itself which may ultimately create numerous other problems – the Appellate Authority that is respondent no. 4 is directed to decide the appeal of the petitioners in accordance with law – petition disposed off. – WRIT TAX No. – 907 of 2018 Da
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ection of the High Court preferred an appeal on 2.5.2018 before the respondent no. 4- Additional Commissioner, Grade-II but till date no final order has been passed as a result the seized goods and the vehicle of the petitioners is lying on the road. The petitioners have preferred this petition for a direction for the release of the aforesaid goods and for the decision of the above appeal forthwith. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents is not in a position to inform why the appeal could not be decided and where the seized goods are kept by the authorities till they are ordered to be released by the competent authority or court. The respondents cannot be keep on detaining or seizing the goods and to keep them on the road it
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =