M/s Krishna Enterprises Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others

2018 (9) TMI 367 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 42 (All) – Seizure of goods – seizure order does not disclose the specific provision of law which has been violated in transporting the goods – Held that:- Learned Standing Counsel may seek instructions in the matter and file counter affidavit within a month. The petitioner may file rejoinder affidavit, if any, within two weeks thereafter – In the meantime the goods seized along with vehicle shall be released forthwith on furnishing security other than cash or bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of tax and penalty imposed. – WRIT TAX No. 904 of 2018 Dated:- 5-6-2018 – Mr. Pankaj Mithal and Mr. Jayant Banerji, JJ. Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Pandey Counsel for Respondent :-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply