2018 (8) TMI 1097 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – TMI – Monetary amount involved in the appeal – Held that:- The appellant did not dispute the fact that the amount involved in the present appeal is ₹ 10,00,000/ As the amount involved is less than the limit prescribed in the Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (Judicial Cell) dated 11.07.2018, the present appeal be dismissed as not maintainable.
–
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable. – CEA No.40 of 2018 (O&M) Dated:- 9-8-2018 – MR. RAJESH BINDAL AND MR. AMIT RAWAL, JJ. For The Appellant : Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate ORDER RAJESH BINDAL J. The appellant in the present appeal has challenged the order dated 24.04.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
that to prove the case of clandestine removal, evidence with mathematical precision is not mandatory and has thus committed a grave error in setting aside a well reasoned order in original? (E) Whether the impugned order dated 24.04.2017, Annexure A-3, passed by the Ld. Tribunal is against the settled position of law. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant did not dispute the fact that the amount involved in the present appeal is ₹ 10,00,000/-. As the amount involved is less than the limit prescribed in the Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (Judicial Cell) dated 11.07.2018, the present appeal be dismissed as not maintainable. Ordered accordingly. Consequently, the applications for cond
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =