E.V. RADHA KRISHNA KURUP Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE), MINISTRY OF FINANCE, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, NEW DELHI, GST COUNCIL, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, NEW DELHI AND THE COMMISSIONER, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KARAMANA, KERALA
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1829 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. 8 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 14-6-2018
W. P. (C. ) No. 17348 of 2018
GST
MR. P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JJ.
For The Petitioner : ADV.SRI.MOHAN GEORGE
For The Respondent : ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA, SRI.P.R.SREEJITH,SC,GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK AND SRI. V. K. SHAMSUDEEN
JUDGMENT
Petitioner was a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Adde
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
rcumstances of this case as also the orders passed in similar matters, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition permitting the petitioner to prefer an application before the additional sixth respondent, the Nodal Officer appointed to resolve issues in the nature of one raised by the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say that if the petitioner prefers an application within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, same shall be considered and appropriate decision shall be taken by the additional sixth respondent within a week thereafter. Needless also to say that if it is found that the petitioner could not upload FORM GST TRAN-1 for reasons not attributable to him, appropriate action shall be tak
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =