2018 (7) TMI 1423 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – KARNATAKA – [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 110 (AAR) – Export of services – Whether the auxiliary services provided by H&M Hennes & Mauritz India Private Limited to Plus Trading Far East Limited, Hong Kong in terms of Auxiliary Services Agreement dated 19th January 2015 (effective from 01 February 2015) qualify as Export of Services under Section 2(6) of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act’ 2017 and hence be treated as zero rated supplies in terms of Section 16 of the IGST Act?
–
Held that:- The Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling vide their letter dated 27.06.2018 – The application filed by the Applicant for advance ruling is dismissed as
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
with rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01. They also enclosed copy of challan for ₹ 10,000/- (CGST- ₹ 5,000/- & SGST – ₹ 5,000/-) bearing CIN number UTIB18012900065097 dated 11-01-2018. 2. The Applicant is a wholly owned subsidiary of M/s H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB ( H & M Sweden ) which is a Swedish company which is into fashion clothing industry engaged in supply of fashion wears all around the globe. The Applicant is engaged in provision of auxiliary support services to the overseas entity i.e. Plus Trading Far East Ltd., Hong Kong ( Plus HK )which is also one of the subsidiary of H& M Swedan. Which are primarily involve support services in supplier training, H R & A
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
epresent the applicant / appear, act and plead for them in connection with the proceedings, before the authorities in respect of the instant application for Advance Ruling under CGST / SGST Act 2017. 5. The authorized representatives Sri. Mihir Mehta, Advocate and Sri. Vaibhav Jain, Manager, Tax & Regulatory Services, Ernst & Young LLP, attended the personal hearing proceedings, held on 21.02.2018, 07.03.2018 & 09.05.2018 and presented their submissions. The Applicant, vide their letter dated 27.06.2018, informed that they intend to withdraw the Advance Ruling Application and requested to permit them to withdraw the application. FINDINGS & DISCUSSION: 6. We have considered the submissions made by the Applicant in their appli
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =