Vijay Kuamr Nagpal Versus Union Of India
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1099 – MADHYA PRADESH, HIGH COURT – TMI
MADHYA PRADESH, HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 12-7-2018
W. P. No. 15420/2018(PIL)
GST
P.K. JAISWAL AND S.K. AWASTHI JJ.
Shri A.M. Mathur, learned Senor Counsel with Shri Vaibhav Asawa, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Romesh Dave, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State, on advance notice.
Heard on the question of admission as well as on the question of grant of interim relief.
Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the GST regime has been introduced in the country on 1/07/2017 with the motive of creation of “One nation, One market, One tax”.
In pursuance to the aforesaid, in the year 2
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
removed as GST regime has been introduced and, therefore, they cannot restrict or obstruct any of the vehicle from asking them to pay tax on the check posts except the GST.
Issue notice to the respondents No.3 and 5, on payment of PF within 3 working days, returnable within four weeks. In addition, Dasti notice, as per rules.
Shri Romesh Dave, learned Govt. Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 2 and, therefore, no further notice is required and he prays for and is granted four weeks time to file reply. In the meanwhile, they shall take appropriate steps in pursuant to the notification issued on 24/06/2017 and 1/07/2017, by which all the check posts have been abolished, directing the officers for removal of the che
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =