Yachio India Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Customs & Central Excise, Alwar

2018 (7) TMI 909 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI – Valuation – inclusion of VAT subsidy amount in the form of Vat-37 B in arriving at assessable value – Held that:- The issue is covered by the decision in the case of GREENLAM INDUSTRIES LTD [2018 (4) TMI 1552 – CESTAT NEW DELHI], where Identical issue decided in the case of SHREE CEMENT LTD. SHREE JAIPUR CEMENT LTD. VERSUS CCE, ALWAR [2018 (1) TMI 915 – CESTAT NEW DELHI], where it was held that There is no justification for inclusion in the assessable value, the VAT amounts paid by the assessee using VAT 37B Challans – appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal No. E/51232/2018-EX (DB) – A/52294/2018-EX[DB] – Dated:- 20-6-2018 – Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) And Mr. Bijay Kumar, Member (Technical) Sh. B.L Yadav, Adv for the appellant Sh. M.R. Sharma, DR for the respondent ORDER Per: Bijay kumar The present appeal is filed against the above mention Order-in-Appeal. The issue involve in this case pertains to inclusion of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

record. As out lined above, the appellants are covered by the Investment Promotion Schemes of the Rajasthan Government. In terms of the various schemes of the Rajasthan Government, the appellants are required to discharge their VAT liability by making payment of the same. Out of such VAT credited to the Government, a certain portion is disbursed back to them in the form of subsidies. Such disbursement happens in the form of VAT 37 B, challan which can be utilized in subsequent periods to discharge VAT liability. The crux of the dispute in the present case is whether such subsidy amounts are required to be included in the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the appellants, in terms of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. As per the concept of transaction value outlined in Section 4, with effect from 01/07/2000, any sales tax/VAT actually paid can be deducted from the transaction value for payment of excise duty. Revenue has taken the view that payment of VAT using 37B Challans

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

them in the form of subsidy in Challan 37 B. Such Challans are as good as cash but can be used only for payment of VAT in the subsequent period. In terms of the scheme of the Government of Rajasthan payment of VAT using such Challan are considered legal payments of tax. In view of the above, Revenue is not correct in taking the view that VAT liability discharged by utilizing such subsidy challans cannot be taken as VAT actually paid. 10. It is pertinent to reproduce the observations of the Tribunal in the Welspun Corporation Ltd. case 5.1 The Respondent company opted for Remission of Tax Scheme and was thus eligible for the Capital subsidy in the form of remission of Sales Tax subject to the conditions to be fulfilled…. The subsidy in the form of remission of sales tax was in fact a percentage of capital investment… Separate assessment orders were thus issued by the assessing officer of the sales tax department from time to time towards the incentive scheme amount. The Co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply