New Steel Trading Pvt. Ltd., Dinesh Mehta Versus Commissioner of CGST, Thane Rural
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 769 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 24-4-2018
Appeal Nos. E/87995, 87998/2017 – Order No. A/86152-86153/2018
Central Excise
Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial)
Shri Sunil Agarwal, Advocate, for appellant
Shri S.J. Sahu, Assistant Commissioner (AR), and Shri Deepak Chavan, Superintendent (AR), for respondent
ORDER
The facts of the case are that the appellant is using their moulds for manufacture of their final product. After use for the substantial period, the moulds get damaged and defective, which are not capable of being used further. Therefore, the said defective/damaged moulds ar
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
in the case of Wyeth Laboratories Ltd. vs. CCE, Bombay – 2000 (120) ELT 218 (Tri.-LB). He also relied upon the following judgments:-
(i) La Prenca Industries Pvt. Ltd. – 2017 (346) ELT 412 (Tri.-Mum.);
(ii) La Prenca Industries Pvt. Ltd. – 2017 (349) ELT A27 (Bom.);
(iii) Shakti Wire Products – 2009 (241) ELT 223 (Tri.- Mum.);
(iv) Surya Colour Products Pvt. Ltd. – 2012 (280) ELT 455 (Tri.-Bang.).
3. Shri S.J. Sahu, learned Assistant Commissioner and Shri Deepak Chavan, learned Superintendent (ARs), appearing on behalf of Revenue, reiterate the finding of the impugned order.
4. I have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides.
5. I find that the Revenue has sought to demand excise duty on the damaged/defecti
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =