M/s. MANJUNATHAA ROCK DRILLS AND T. MURUGESH, PROPRIETOR, ASIAN AGENCIES Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KALPATTA, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS

M/s. MANJUNATHAA ROCK DRILLS AND T. MURUGESH, PROPRIETOR, ASIAN AGENCIES Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KALPATTA, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, STATE OF KERALA, TAXES (B) DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT AND GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1736 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 125 (Ker)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 24-5-2018
WP(C). No. 15256 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. Tomson T. Emmanuel
For The Respondent : Sri. V.K. Shamsudeen And Sri. Sreelal N.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ection 129 of the Act in respect of the goods detained. The petitioners, therefore, seek appropriate directions in this regard in the writ petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned Government Pleader.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as also the provisions contained in Section 129 of the Act, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the second respondent to complete the adjudication in respect of the goods detained in terms of Ext.P5(a) order within two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Ordered accordingly. This shall be done having regard to Exts.P6 and P6(a) objections preferred by the petitioners and after affording the petit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply